Next Article in Journal
Salmonella Promotes Its Own Survival in B Cells by Inhibiting Autophagy
Next Article in Special Issue
ToBRFV Infects the Reproductive Tissues of Tomato Plants but Is Not Transmitted to the Progenies by Pollination
Previous Article in Journal
Sphingosine-1-Phosphate (S1P) and S1P Signaling Pathway Modulators, from Current Insights to Future Perspectives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Topical Spray of dsRNA Induces Mortality and Inhibits Chilli Leaf Curl Virus Transmission by Bemisia tabaci Asia II 1
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differential Transcriptional Responses in Two Old World Bemisia tabaci Cryptic Species Post Acquisition of Old and New World Begomoviruses

1
Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
2
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, 3250 Rainwater Road, Tifton, GA 31793, USA
3
School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ 85721, USA
4
USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, FL 34945, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2022, 11(13), 2060; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11132060
Submission received: 2 May 2022 / Revised: 20 June 2022 / Accepted: 27 June 2022 / Published: 29 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Plant-Virus/Viroid-Vector Interactions)

Abstract

:
Begomoviruses are transmitted by several cryptic species of the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), in a persistent and circulative manner. Upon virus acquisition and circulative translocation within the whitefly, a multitude of molecular interactions occur. This study investigated the differentially expressed transcript profiles associated with the acquisition of the Old World monopartite begomovirus, tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV), and two New World bipartite begomoviruses, sida golden mosaic virus (SiGMV) and cucurbit leaf crumple virus (CuLCrV), in two invasive B. tabaci cryptic species, Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) and Mediterranean (MED). A total of 881 and 559 genes were differentially expressed in viruliferous MEAM1 and MED whiteflies, respectively, compared with their non-viruliferous counterparts, of which 146 genes were common between the two cryptic species. For both cryptic species, the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with TYLCV and SiGMV acquisition were higher compared with DEGs associated with CuLCrV acquisition. Pathway analysis indicated that the acquisition of begomoviruses induced differential changes in pathways associated with metabolism and organismal systems. Contrasting expression patterns of major genes associated with virus infection and immune systems were observed. These genes were generally overexpressed and underexpressed in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults, respectively. Further, no specific expression pattern was observed among genes associated with fitness (egg production, spermatogenesis, and aging) in viruliferous whiteflies. The weighted gene correlation network analysis of viruliferous B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults identified different hub genes potentially implicated in the vector competence and circulative tropism of viruses. Taken together, the results indicate that both vector cryptic species and the acquired virus species could differentially affect gene expression.

1. Introduction

Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), commonly known as the sweetpotato whitefly, is widely distributed in the subtropics/tropics, where it can be an agricultural pest [1,2,3]. Feeding by this pest induces physiological symptoms and results in the transmission of a devastating group of plant viruses belonging to the genus Begomovirus [4,5,6,7,8]. Bemisia tabaci comprises several cryptic species with distinct phylogeographical distributions [9,10,11,12,13]. These cryptic species and their haplotypes are morphologically indistinguishable from one another, and some have been found to possess distinct biological traits such as fecundity, endosymbiont complement, host range, the propensity to develop insecticide resistance, ecological adaptation, and, importantly, transmission specificity involving begomoviruses [1,14,15,16,17,18].
Begomoviruses are small non-enveloped viruses with single-stranded circular DNA genomes of about 2800 (monopartite) to 5200 (bipartite) nt each, and they possess a unique morphology consisting of twinned or paired icosahedral particles [5]. Monopartite viruses such as TYLCV consist of a single DNA component, and bipartite viruses such as SiGMV and CuLCrV include both DNA-A and DNA-B components [5,19,20,21]. For the successful transmission of begomoviruses, whiteflies must ingest viral particles with their stylets while feeding. Virions pass through the food canal and reach the esophagus and midgut, where they traverse into the hemolymph. Virions are then endocytosed into the primary salivary glands and are egested with the saliva into the plant phloem. This circulative translocation of begomoviruses in B. tabaci is dependent upon the viral coat protein interactions with probable receptors and other whitefly proteins [22]. Few receptors and begomovirus-interacting proteins such as the GroEL chaperone protein, heat shock proteins, midgut proteins, peptidyl-prolyl isomerase protein genes, and the peptidoglycan recognition protein gene have been identified [23,24,25,26,27]. However, there may be many others involved, and unravelling them is critical to understanding virus transmission by whiteflies.
Among the members of the B. tabaci species complex, the Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1), also known as the North Africa-Middle East mitotype or B biotype, and the Mediterranean (MED), also known as the North Africa-Mediterranean mitotype or Q biotype, are invasive and widely distributed [2,10,11,12]. Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 was first reported in the United States in the mid-1980s and has since become the predominant cryptic species on field crops after displacing the native New World 1 species, also known as the American Tropics (AMTROP) cryptic species or A biotype, whereas B. tabaci MED was first reported in 2004 and is primarily confined to greenhouse-grown ornamentals [1,15,28]. Recently, B. tabaci MED was reported on open-field crops in Florida and Georgia [29,30]. In the southeastern United States, B. tabaci MEAM1 occurs on field-grown vegetable crops such as tomato, eggplant, snap bean, and cucurbits and on cotton [30,31]. In these cropping systems, B. tabaci MEAM1 is known to transmit tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV), sida golden mosaic virus (SiGMV), and cucurbit leaf crumple virus (CuLCrV), which cause diseases [32,33]. In laboratory studies, B. tabaci MED tissues accumulated reduced amounts of the two New World begomoviruses compared to B. tabaci MEAM1 and did not transmit SiGMV and CuLCrV, albeit it was an efficient vector of TYLCV [34,35,36]. Molecular and cellular factors underlying the differential transmission of these and several other begomoviruses by the B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED have not been elucidated, and studies identifying their primary transmission determinants are critical.
Plant viruses can alter the phenotype and physiological traits of their hosts, which in turn modulates vector preference and fitness, at times favoring their spread [37,38]. Begomovirus infections were reported to influence vector preference and fitness in different ways depending on the host plant [39,40,41,42]. However, the mechanisms involved in such begomoviruses-induced macro-effects on their whitefly vectors are not well understood, and high throughput sequencing platforms have been utilized to understand virus-associated macro-effects on whiteflies [43].
Using various omics platforms, including transcriptomics, the virus-associated micro-effects of begomoviruses and criniviruses have been examined for B. tabaci (MEAM1 and MED) [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. However, what remains unclear is whether micro-effects are due to the direct effect of the virus on the vector or to the indirect effects resulting from the modulation of the physiological changes in the infected host plant following virus infection. To minimize the host-modulated indirect effects of plant viruses on their vectors through feeding on the plant sap of virus-infected hosts, it is crucial to transfer viruliferous whiteflies from a virus-infected host plant to a virus non-host plant for gut clearing prior to RNA extraction [44].
In this study, differential gene expression in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED was assessed by transcriptome analysis post acquisition of three begomoviruses, the Old World monopartite TYLCV, and the New World bipartite SiGMV and CuLCrV. Libraries were prepared for viruliferous and non-viruliferous whiteflies given a 72 h acquisition access period (AAP) on the respective begomovirus-infected or non-infected host plants, followed by a 72 h feeding access on cotton, a non-host of the three begomoviruses. The objectives of this study were to (i) assess the differences in gene expression between B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED upon the acquisition of Old and New World begomoviruses, and (ii) locate putative hub genes and co-expressed genes (modules) responsive to the acquisition of Old and New World begomoviruses using weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Generation of Plants and Insect Rearing

Cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. PHY 339 WRF (UGA extension services, Tifton, GA, USA), tomato, Solanum lycopersicum cv. Florida 47 (Seminis Vegetable Seeds, St. Louis, MO, USA), prickly sida, Sida spinosa (grown from field-collected seeds from UGA, Tifton, GA, USA), and squash, Cucurbita pepo cv. Goldstar (Syngenta®, Wilmington, DE, USA) seeds were planted in 10 cm diameter × 8 cm tall pots (Hummert International, Earth City, MO, USA) at two seeds of each host per pot using the PRO-MIX BX general purpose medium (PRO-MIX, Quakertown, PA, USA). Fertigation was carried out at weekly intervals using water-soluble fertilizer (Miracle-Gro®, Scotts Miracle-Gro products, Inc., Marysville, OH, USA). Pots were placed in whitefly-proof cages (Megaview Science Co., Taichung, Taiwan) [47.5(l) × 47.5(w) × 93(h) cm3] in the greenhouse and maintained at 25 °C, 60% RH, and a 16 h L:8 h D photoperiod. One week post germination, the seedlings were thinned to one per pot. Cotton plants were used to rear whiteflies, as they are not a host of TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV.
The B. tabaci MEAM1 colony (Genbank accession number: MN970031) was established from individuals collected in 2009 from cotton plants in Tifton, Georgia. This colony was reared on cotton plants in 10 cm diameter × 8 cm tall pots in whitefly-proof cages in the greenhouse under the conditions described above. The B. tabaci MED colony (GenBank accession number: MZ469725) was established on cotton plants in 2017 from individuals collected from poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima Wild. Ex Klotzsch) plants from a nursery located in North Georgia, USA and maintained by Prof. Ronald D. Oetting, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA. The B. tabaci MED colony was reared under the same conditions as those reported for the B. tabaci MEAM1 colony. The identities of both colonies were examined by PCR amplification and by partially sequencing the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene in the 3’ barcode region [55,56]. The B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED colonies were maintained in separate greenhouses to avoid population admixtures, and their identities were periodically screened (every alternate month) to ensure no contamination had occurred.
The virus isolates used in this study are described extensively in Gautam et al. [36]. Briefly, the TYLCV isolate was collected in 2009 from a commercial tomato farm located in Montezuma in Macon County in GA, USA. TYLCV has since been maintained in TYLCV-susceptible tomato cultivar (Florida 47) through B. tabaci MEAM1-mediated inoculation. The SiGMV isolate was collected in 2018 from prickly sida plants on field edges at the UGA Horticulture Hill Farm in Tifton (Tift County, GA, USA). SiGMV has since been maintained in prickly sida plants through B. tabaci MEAM1-mediated inoculation. The CuLCrV isolate used in this study was collected in 2016 from infected yellow summer squash plants from the UGA Horticulture Hill Farm in Tifton (Tift County, GA, USA). CuLCrV has since been maintained in yellow summer squash plants through B. tabaci MEAM1-mediated inoculation. Virus-infected plants were obtained by providing B. tabaci MEAM1 a 72 h acquisition access period (AAP) on TYLCV/SiGMV/CuLCrV-infected plants. Subsequently, viruliferous B. tabaci MEAM1 (~100/plant) were attached to the non-infected ~10 cm tall seedlings (tomato, squash, or prickly sida) using clip cages. Inoculated individual plants were placed in separate insect-proof cages under the conditions described above. A week post inoculation, all of the leaves were removed. The infection status of plants in insect-free newly-emerged leaves was evaluated at ~3 weeks post inoculation by endpoint PCR using species-specific primers [36,39].

2.2. Feeding Assay, DNA & RNA Isolation, and RNA Sequencing

Approximately 1000 B. tabaci MEAM1 or MED newly emerged (1–3 days old) whiteflies were collected from the above established colonies and then introduced to either non-infected or virus-infected tomato, prickly sida, and squash plants for an acquisition access period (AAP) of 72 h. After 72 h on either non-infected or virus-infected tomato, prickly sida, or squash plants, the whiteflies (MEAM1 and MED) were transferred to cotton plants for another 72 h to minimize the host effect from either non-infected or infected plants. After 72 h on cotton, ~100 live whiteflies in three to five biological replicates (per treatment) were collected and immediately stored at −20 °C for 20 min and thereafter used for RNA extraction on the same day. Another set of 20 individual whiteflies (MEAM1 or MED) per treatment were collected and used to confirm the presence/absence of the virus. The results indicated that 90–100%, 80–90%, or 70–90% of the B. tabaci MEAM1 and 95–100%, 65–85%, or 60–80% of the MED whiteflies were positive for TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV, respectively. As expected, individual B. tabaci MEAM1 or MED that were given a 72 h feeding access on non-infected tomato, prickly sida, or squash plants (and for 72 h on cotton plants) tested negative for TYLCV, SiGMV, and CuLCrV, respectively.
The total whitefly DNA was extracted from individuals using an InstaGene Matrix containing 6% Chelex resin (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), as previously described by Gautam et al. [30]. The extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C until it was used. PCR reactions containing 2X GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and primers specific to TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV (Table S1) were performed using a T-100 thermocycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The total RNA was extracted using the Ambion TRIzol Reagent (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and purified using the PureLinkTM RNA Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Approximately 50 μL of RNA was shipped to Novogene Corporation Inc. (Sacramento, CA, USA), where RNA sample quality control (QC), mRNA library preparation, and RNA sequencing were carried out.

2.3. RNA Sequencing, Transcriptome Assembly, and Analysis

RNA sample quality control (QC) was carried out using a Nanodrop for preliminary quantitation. Agarose gel electrophoresis was used to test RNA degradation and potential contamination, while the Agilent 2100 was used to assess RNA integrity (RIN) and quantitation. The samples that passed QC (RIN value > 6.8 and concentration of >20 ng/uL) were used for library construction. In brief, the library construction involved enriching mRNA using oligo(dT) beads and the removal of rRNA using the Ribo-Zero kit. Subsequently, the mRNA was fragmented and followed by first- and second-strand cDNA synthesis. Finally, cDNA libraries were generated through adaptor ligation and PCR enrichment. The library QC consisted of three steps: testing library concentration using Qubit 2.0, testing the insert size using the Agilent 2100, and quantifying the library concentration using qPCR. The libraries that passed QC were sequenced on a NovaSeq 6000 Sequencing System (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using the NovaSeq paired end 150 sequencing setting.
Trim Galore v0.6.5 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/ accessed on 1 December 2021) was used to remove adaptors and low-quality sequences with fewer than 20 nt from the high-quality RNA-Seq reads. The quality filtering parameter was set to the default threshold of 20 on a phred+33 scale, where the average quality score per read was 36 across all samples. Ribosomal RNA, the assembled B. tabaci mitochondrion genome, and three bacterial endosymbiont genomes of Candidatus Portiera aleyrodidarum, Hamiltonella, and Rickettsia were aligned to the cleaned reads using BLAT v3.5 [51,57,58,59]. The aligned reads were removed using Seqtk v1.3 (https://github.com/lh3/seqtk accessed on 3 December 2021). The remaining high-quality cleaned paired-end reads were aligned to the reference B. tabaci genome using STAR v2.7.2 [51,60]. Differentially expressed genes between viruliferous (TYLCV/SiGMV/CuLCrV) and non-viruliferous whiteflies were identified using edgeR v3.28.1 [61]. Multiplicity correction was performed by applying the Benjamini–Hochberg method on the p-values to control the false discovery rate (FDR) [62]. For each comparison, genes with an adjusted p-value < 0.05 and a fold change (ratio of viruliferous/non-viruliferous whiteflies) ≥ 1.4 were considered as significantly differentially expressed genes. Volcano plots were generated in R software v4.1.0, and differentially expressed genes were assigned to gene ontology (GO) classes and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways using Blast2GO (BioBam Bioinformatics, Valencia, Spain) and BlastKOALA (http://www.kegg.jp/blastkoala/ accessed on 15 December 2021), respectively [63,64,65]. Significantly expressed GO classes were summarized by removing redundant terms and visualized using REVIGO (http://revigo.irb.hr/ accessed on 10 June 2022) [66]. The annotations of B. tabaci genes were obtained from the published MEAM1 genome for a parallel comparison between B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED transcriptomes [51]. Venn diagrams were created using a webtool from Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Genomics, Ghent University (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/ 21 December 2021) and normalized on percentage basis.
The weighted gene co-expression network (WGCNA) software v1.70-3 was run using the R software v4.1.0 [65,67]. Prior to the construction of the co-expression networks, filtering was performed to select the top 95% quantile of DEGs from the 25 and 27 samples of B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED, respectively. The soft-thresholding power modules (1 to 40) was tested by the gradient independent method, and the scale-independent condition of the signed R2 was set to 0.90. Gene modules were constructed with a power of 28, with a minimum module size set to 20. The interaction relationships across the co-expression modules were used to construct a topological overlap matrix (TOM) by using correlation expression values. The TOM was represented with a dendrogram by setting the parameters mergeCutHeight = 0.15 and detectCutHeight = 0.995. The module color was randomly assigned, and the first principal component from each module was used to calculate the module eigengene. A module–trait relationship heatmap was generated using the labeledHeatmap package available in WGCNA software to show the topological overlap of the co-expression modules based on the module eigengenes. The labeledHeatmap parameters included matrix = moduleTraitCor and main = paste (“Module-trait relationships”). The network analysis of the top 30 genes from the B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED turquoise modules was visualized with Cytoscape v3.9.0 [68].

2.4. Validation of RNA Sequencing Data

To validate the differential expression analysis, 10 genes were randomly selected for each virus treatment (n = 56), and their expression levels were compared between viruliferous and non-viruliferous whiteflies (B. tabaci MEAM1 or MED) for the three viruses (TYLCV, SiGMV, and CuLCrV). For each sample, an aliquot (10 μL) of the RNA was used for validation by reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT- qPCR), and the remainder were used for RNA Sequencing. The primer sequences used for the selected genes are listed in Table S1. The total RNA for each sample (500 ng) was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the GoScriptTM Reverse Transcription System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative PCR reactions were assembled in 12.5 μL duplicate reactions for three biological replicates and carried out using 2X GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) in a Mastercycler® ep realplex thermal cycler (Eppendorf, Hauppauge, NY, USA). An initial denaturation step (2 min at 94 °C) was followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (20 s at 94 °C), primer annealing (15 s at 58–60 °C, depending on the primer set), and extension (15 s at 68 °C). Finally, the melting curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the specificity of the fluorescence signal. Relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method, and the expression level of each gene was normalized to the expression level of β-actin, a whitefly reference gene [69,70].

3. Results

3.1. Summary of RNA Sequencing

Three to five biological replicates were included per virus treatment, resulting in a total of 25 and 27 libraries constructed for B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults, respectively. Raw read pairs for the generated libraries ranged from ~19 to 33 million. After trimming and removing the reads that aligned with the ribosomal RNA, the mitochondrion genome, and the three bacterial endosymbiont genomes (Candidatus Portiera aleyrodidarum, Hamiltonella, and Rickettsia), ~17 to 31 million read pairs were retained in the libraries (Table 1). Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 and MED cleaned read pairs for the different libraries mapped onto the B. tabaci MEAM1 genome by ~90 to 95% and 88 to 91%, respectively (Table 1). The Pearson’s correlation coefficients for all of the biological replicates ranged from 0.9 to 1 (Table S2), suggesting that the data were highly reproducible.

3.2. Overview of Differentially Expressed Genes in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED Adults

Of the 15,668 genes in the genome of B. tabaci MEAM1 (http://www.whiteflygenomics.org/cgi-bin/bta/index.cgi accessed on 15 December 2021), a total of 881 and 559 genes were differentially expressed in viruliferous B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults, respectively, when compared with non-viruliferous whiteflies (Figure 1a–c). In B. tabaci MEAM1 adults, 462 genes (133 overexpressed, 329 underexpressed), 459 genes (164 overexpressed, 295 underexpressed), and 69 genes (53 overexpressed, 16 underexpressed) were differentially expressed following the acquisition of TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV, respectively (Figure 1d and Figure 2a–c). In B. tabaci MED adults, 403 genes (195 overexpressed, 208 underexpressed), 165 genes (111 overexpressed, 54 underexpressed), and 44 genes (10 overexpressed, 34 underexpressed) were differentially expressed following the acquisition of TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV, respectively (Figure 1d and Figure 2d–f).
The RNA sequencing-based differential gene expression results were validated via RT-qPCR on 10 randomly selected differentially expressed genes per whitefly species-virus treatment (n = 56), using the β-actin gene as an internal standard (Table S3). The results showed that the expression trends obtained from RNA sequencing and RT-qPCR were highly consistent (Table S3).

3.3. Common DEGs among B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED Adults

Of the 881 and 559 DEGs found in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults, respectively, 146 were found to be differentially expressed in common following the acquisition of the three viruses (Figure 1a). Seventy genes—almost half of the common DEGs between B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults—were unknown, whereas the other 76 genes were annotated (http://www.whiteflygenomics.org/cgi-bin/bta/index.cgi accessed on 15 December 2021). All of the common DEGs (146) between B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults were analyzed using functional analysis tools (Blast, InterProScan, Blast2GO Mapping, and Blast2GO Annotation) available in the OmicsBox version 1.4.11. Only 72 genes (69 annotated and 3 unknown) were assigned functional groups under three classification systems: biological process (44 genes), molecular function (60 genes), and cellular component (33 genes). Fourteen Gene Ontology (GO) terms were assigned under the biological process category, of which the cellular process and the establishment of localization were significant (Figure 3a). Eight GO terms were assigned under the molecular function category, of which catalytic activity, binding, heterocyclic compound binding, and transport activity were significant (Figure 3b). In the cellular component category, two GO terms were significant, and they were membrane and intrinsic component of membrane (Figure 3c).
Only 28.8% (42 of 146) of the total number of common DEGs between B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults were annotated using the KEGG analysis [63] and mapped to 74 biochemical pathways (Table S4a,b). The most represented category pathways were (i) metabolism, (ii) organismal systems, (iii) human diseases/pathogens, and (iv) cellular processes.

3.4. Unique DEGs in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED Adults

Of the 881 DEGs found in the B. tabaci MEAM1 adults, 735 were found to be uniquely and differentially expressed following the virus acquisition (Figure 1a). Using the functional analysis tools available in the OmicsBox version 1.4.11, 526 of the 735 genes were assigned functional groups under three classification systems: biological process (290 genes), molecular function (387 genes), and cellular component (296 genes). Twenty-two GO terms were assigned under the biological process category, of which 20 terms were significant (Figure 4a). Ten GO terms were assigned under the molecular function category, five (binding, protein binding, hydrolase activity, heterocyclic compound binding, and organic cyclic compound binding) of which were significant (Figure 4b). In the cellular component category, sixteen GO terms were identified, and 12 of those were significant (Figure 4c).
Of the 559 DEGs found in B. tabaci MED adults, 413 were found to be uniquely and differentially expressed following the virus acquisition (Figure 1a). Using functional analysis tools, 223 genes of the 413 genes were assigned functional groups under three classification systems: biological process (120 genes), molecular function (179 genes), and cellular component (107 genes). Sixteen GO terms were assigned under the biological process category, of which four (biogenesis, cellular process, cellular component organization, and localization) were significant (Figure 5a). Eight GO terms were assigned under the molecular function category, of which seven were significant (Figure 5b). In the cellular component category, eleven GO terms were identified, of which three (membrane, intrinsic component of membrane, and protein-containing complex) were significant (Figure 5c).
Only 44.8% (329 of 735) of the total number of DEGs in the B. tabaci MEAM1 adults were annotated using the KEGG analysis [63] and were mapped to 301 biochemical pathways (Table S4c,d). The most represented pathway categories were (i) metabolism, (ii) human diseases, and (iii) organismal systems. For the B. tabaci MED adults, 42.4% (175 of 413) of the total number of DEGs were annotated using the KEGG analysis [63] and were mapped to 162 biochemical pathways (Table S4e,f). Similar to the MEAM1 whiteflies, metabolism, human diseases/pathogens, and organismal systems were the most represented pathway categories.

3.5. Co-Expression Networks from B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED Adults

The co-expression of the genes from the B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults that acquired TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV were identified in relation to the expression data. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), which clusters genes into modules based on weighted gene–gene interactions, was used to study the co-expression. For B. tabaci MEAM1, eight modules were identified (Figure 6a), and a Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis showed the connections between the three virus species (Figure 6b). The B. tabaci MEAM1 interactions for the largest module, MEturqoiuse, were checked for the top interacting genes among the 30 identified genes (Figure 6c). The top four most highly connected genes were: Bta03319 (Tat-linked quality control protein TatD), Bta00139 (Riboflavin kinase), Bta15228 (Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 L3, putative), and Bta06777 (GRIP and coiled-coil domain-containing protein, putative). In the B. tabaci MED analysis, nine modules were identified (Figure 7a), and a Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis showed the connections between the three virus species (Figure 7b). The B. tabaci MED interactions for the largest module, MEturqoiuse, were checked for the top interacting genes among the 30 identified genes (Figure 7c). The top four most highly connected genes were: Bta03156 (Serine protease 7, isoform), Bta03155 (Serine protease), Bta03265 (Serine protease 7, isoform A), and Bta06572 (unknown protein).
For TYLCV, six modules were identified (Figure S1a), and a Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis showed the connections between B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED (Figure S1b). TYLCV interactions for the largest module, MEturqoiuse, were checked for the top interacting genes among the 30 identified genes (Figure S1c). The top three most highly connected genes were all unknown proteins (Bta14024, Bta04891, and Bta08994). For SiGMV, six modules were identified (Figure S2a), and a Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis showed the connections between the two whitefly cryptic species (Figure S2b). SiGMV interactions for the largest module, MEturqoiuse, were checked for the top interacting genes among the 30 identified genes (Figure S2c). The top four most highly connected genes were all unknown proteins (Bta10403, Bta01241, and Bta04118), except for Bta13010 (Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein). For CuLCrV, five modules were identified (Figure S3a), and a Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis showed the connections between B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED (Figure S3b). CuLCrV interactions for the largest module, MEturqoiuse, were checked for the top interacting genes among the 30 identified genes (Figure S3c). The top three most highly connected genes were: Bta02748 (AP-3 complex subunit mu-1), Bta06159 (Ribosomal protein L19), and Bta14433 (unknown protein).
Following the overview of the functional annotation and pathway analyses of the B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED genes, genes that could influence virus–vector interaction were examined.

3.6. DEGs among B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED Adults Associated with Virus–Vector Interactions

3.6.1. Virus Infection

Among the common DEGs between B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults, KEGG annotations revealed three generic biotic stress-induced genes (Table 2) under the “human disease” category. These genes, all underexpressed except in one instance (Table 2), were associated with the infection of two viruses: Human T-cell leukemia virus 1 (Bta03437—Zinc finger protein) and Measles (Bta02903—Heat shock protein 70 and Bta09867—70 kDa heat shock protein) (Table S4b).
In B. tabaci MEAM1 adults specifically, 27 genes were associated with different viruses including Human T-cell leukemia virus 1 (four genes), Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (6 genes), Hepatitis B virus (four genes), Hepatitis C virus (one gene), Coronavirus (one gene), Influenza A virus (two genes), Measles virus (three genes), Herpes simplex virus 1 (two genes), Human cytomegalovirus (eight genes), Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (three genes), Epstein–Barr virus (three genes), and Human papillomavirus (nine genes) (Table S4d). The majority of the genes (21/27) associated with virus infection were overexpressed, with the Ras-like/related (four genes) and heat shock protein (three genes) genes being the most predominant (Table 2).
Similarly, seven genes, four overexpressed and three underexpressed, were associated with the acquisition of three begomoviruses in B. tabaci MED (Table 2). The differentially expressed genes were associated with the infection of Human T-cell leukemia virus 1 (one gene), Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (three genes), Coronavirus (one gene), Measles virus (1 gene), Herpes simplex virus 1 (four genes), Human cytomegalovirus (two genes), and Epstein–Barr virus (two genes) (Table S4f).

3.6.2. Signal Transduction

Among the shared DEGs identified in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults, KEGG annotation identified four genes. All but one (Bta02903) were underexpressed (Table 3) and were associated with three signal transduction pathways, namely, AMPK (Bta07645), Apelin (Bta03437), and MAPK (Bta02903 and Bta09867) (Table S4b).
Fifty-one genes (35 overexpressed and 16 underexpressed) were annotated using the KEGG analysis (Table 3) and associated with 29 signal transduction pathways in MEAM1 whiteflies (Table S4d). The pathways and their associated genes are included below (Figure 8). Some of the prevalent genes in the MEAM1 whiteflies signaling pathways were Ras-like/related genes, protein kinase, acyl-CoS desaturase, heat shock, and guanine nucleotide-binding (Table 3).
In the B. tabaci MED adults, 11 genes (4 overexpressed and 7 underexpressed) were associated with 14 signaling pathways using KEGG annotation (Table 3) (Table S4f). These pathways and the associated genes are included below (Figure 9).

3.6.3. Signaling Molecules and Virus Interaction

Using KEGG annotation, five putative receptor genes (two overexpressed and three underexpressed) were identified in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults. They include: Bta03110, Bta01738—Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1, Bta15373—Neuropeptide FF receptor 2 under the neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction, Bta04818 under the cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction, and Bta07388—Syndecan under the cell adhesion molecules (Table S4d). The genes Bta03110 and Bta04818 were also associated with both signal transduction and/or virus infection (Table 2 and Table 3). Putative receptor genes were not identified in B. tabaci MED adults’ transcriptome data.

3.6.4. Immune Systems

Among the DEGs shared by both B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults, 10 genes (6 up- and underexpressed depending on whitefly/virus treatment and 4 underexpressed) under the organismal systems were associated with three immune system pathways by KEGG annotation (Table 4). Seven of the ten genes were cathepsin B, while the other three were protein spaetzle and heat shock proteins (Table 4). These genes belonged to the antigen processing and presentation (seven cathepsin B genes) pathway, NOD-like receptor signaling pathway (seven cathepsin B and two heat shock protein genes), and Toll and Imd signaling pathways (protein spaetzle gene) (Table S4b).
A total of 33 genes (21 overexpressed and 12 underexpressed) were annotated using the KEGG analysis (Table 4) and associated with 17 immune system pathways in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults (Table S4d). Cathepsin B (seven genes) and Ras-like/related (five genes) genes were the most predominant in this category (Table 4).
In the B. tabaci MED adults, 20 genes (6 overexpressed and 14 underexpressed) were associated with six immune systems by KEGG annotation (Table 4). Among the genes identified in the immune systems category, the majority were cathepsins (11 genes), and they belonged to the following pathways: hematopoietic cell lineage (1 genes), platelet activation (2 genes), NOD-like receptor signaling pathway (9 genes), antigen processing and presentation (15 genes), IL-17 signaling pathway (1 gene), and Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosis (1 gene) (Table S4f).

3.6.5. Cellular Processes (Apoptosis, Lysosome, and Phagosome)

Among the DEGs shared by B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults, eight cathepsin genes were associated with the apoptosis and lysosome pathways by KEGG annotation (Table S4b). All of those genes were also associated with immune systems, except for Bta20005—cathepsin F (Table 4). The Bta05445-protein transport protein Sec61 subunit β was the only gene associated with phagosome among the shared DEGs identified in B. tabaci MEAM1 (fold change: −0.93, treatment: SiGMV) and MED (fold change: 0.89, treatment: TYLCV) adults.
A total of 34 genes (17 overexpressed and 17 underexpressed) were annotated by KEGG analysis (Table 5) and associated with cellular processes in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults (Table S4d). Cathepsin F/F-like (nine genes) and cathepsin B (seven genes) genes were the most predominant in this category (Table 5), whereas, among the apoptosis, lysosome, and phagosome pathways, 22, 23, and 7 genes were identified, respectively.
In B. tabaci MED adults, 19 genes (6 overexpressed, 12 underexpressed, one in both directions) were associated with cellular processes by KEGG annotation (Table 5). Except for six genes, all were cathepsins (13 genes). The genes in the lysosome (17 genes) and apoptosis (13 genes) pathways were more represented than the genes associated with the phagosome category (four genes) (Table S4f).

3.7. DEGs among B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED Adults Associated with Fitness

3.7.1. Reproduction

Using GO annotation, three genes associated with reproduction were identified in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults. Bta01855—DNA polymerase ε subunit 3 (fold change: 1.73) and Bta06648—gametocyte-specific factor 1 (fold change: 1.16) were both overexpressed in B. tabaci MEAM1 that acquired TYLCV, while Bta01607—ERC protein 2 (fold change: −2.17) was underexpressed in B. tabaci MEAM1 that acquired TYLCV. Further, egg production-associated gene Bta07852—vitellogenin (fold change: −1.63) was underexpressed in B. tabaci MEAM1 that acquired TYLCV. In both B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults, another vitellogenin gene (Bta11903) was overexpressed (fold change: 1.61) in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults that acquired CuLCrV, while it was underexpressed (fold change: −1.32) in B. tabaci MED adults that acquired TYLCV.

3.7.2. Longevity

Based on the KEGG pathway annotation, three genes (two overexpressed/underexpressed and one underexpressed) were associated with two aging pathways among the DEGs shared between B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults. These pathways included longevity regulating pathway—worm (Bta14177—fatty acyl-CoA reductase 1) and longevity regulating pathway—multiple species (Bta02903 and Bta09867) (Table S4b). The Bta02903 and Bta09867 genes were associated with several pathways (Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4). Bta14177 was overexpressed (fold change: 1.59) in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults that acquired SiGMV, while it was underexpressed (fold change: −1.93) in B. tabaci MED adults that acquired TYLCV.
Fifteen genes (five overexpressed and ten underexpressed) were annotated using the KEGG analysis (Table 6) and associated with aging in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults (Table S4d). Acyl-CoA related (five genes) and heat shock protein (four genes) genes were the most predominant in this category (Table 6). Three, nine, and four genes were classified under longevity regulating pathway, longevity regulating pathway—worm, and longevity regulating pathway—multiple species, respectively.
In B. tabaci MED adults, five genes (two overexpressed and three underexpressed) were identified in the aging pathways based on KEGG annotation (Table 6). Four acyl-CoA-related genes and the heat shock protein gene were grouped under longevity regulating pathway—worm and longevity regulating pathway—multiple species, respectively (Table S4f).

4. Discussion

This study assessed the differences in gene expression in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED whiteflies in response to the acquisition of Old and New World begomoviruses. Both the Old and New World viruses examined in this study were transmitted by the B. tabaci MEAM1 cryptic species, and only the Old World virus (TYLCV) was transmitted by the B. tabaci MED cryptic species [36]. Gene expression differences were compared between the two cryptic species following the acquisition of TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV. Across all three virus treatments, more transcriptional changes were recorded with B. tabaci MEAM1 adults (881 genes) than with B. tabaci MED adults (559 genes), which represented only 5.6% and 3.6%, respectively, of the overall number of genes (15,668) reported for the B. tabaci MEAM1 genome (http://www.whiteflygenomics.org/cgi-bin/bta/index.cgi accessed on 15 December 2021). The high number of transcriptional responses occurring in B. tabaci MEAM1 whitefly as opposed to the B. tabaci MED whiteflies could be due to the reduced interactions of the two New World begomoviruses in B. tabaci MED adults.
The findings indicated that begomovirus species induced variable transcriptional changes in whiteflies upon acquisition. In agreement, previous studies have also reported variable transcriptional responses in whiteflies upon virus acquisition. For instance, 236 genes were differentially expressed in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults that acquired tomato yellow leaf curl China virus (TYLCCNV) compared with non-viruliferous whiteflies [71]. Two other studies using the same whitefly cryptic species and virus species reported different numbers of differentially expressed genes in B. tabaci MEAM1 that acquired TYLCCNV when compared with their non-viruliferous counterparts. There were 457 genes in the study of Luan et al. [50], whereas there were 1606 genes in the study of Luan et al. [44]. Similarly, in the TYLCV pathosystem, two independent studies reported a contrasting number of differentially expressed genes (79 genes versus 1347 genes) in viruliferous B. tabaci MEAM1 compared with non-viruliferous, while another study identified 78 differentially expressed genes in viruliferous B. tabaci MED, compared with the non-viruliferous treatment [47,48,49]. Further, contrasting transcriptional changes in the whitefly have been observed in semi-persistently transmitted criniviruses. For example, for the tomato chlorosis virus (ToCV) pathosystem, one study reported 221 differentially expressed genes in viruliferous B. tabaci MED adults compared with non-viruliferous adults, whereas another study reported 1155 differentially expressed genes in viruliferous B. tabaci MEAM1 adults compared with non-viruliferous adults [45,49]. In another crinivirus pathosystem, cucurbit yellow stunting disorder virus, 262 differentially expressed genes were reported in viruliferous B. tabaci MEAM1 compared with non-viruliferous counterparts [46]. The differences in the experimental design and analysis, such as: (i) AAP from 1–7 days, (ii) viruliferous whiteflies with no gut clearing to minimize potential indirect host plant effects, (iii) low throughput compared with high throughput sequencing platforms, (iv) the different number of libraries sequenced, and (v) bioinformatics analyses, could have partly contributed to the observed variations in the number of transcriptional changes observed in whiteflies in different studies.
This study investigated the transcriptional changes in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED induced by three plant viruses belonging to the same genus, Begomovirus, and differential gene expression patterns varied between them. More transcriptional changes were associated with TYLCV acquisition (MEAM1–462 genes and MED–413 genes), followed by SiGMV acquisition (MEAM1–459 genes and MED–165 genes), whereas CuLCrV acquisition (MEAM1–69 genes and MED–44 gene) induced the least number of transcriptional changes. Both TYLCV and SiGMV accumulated at significantly higher levels (copies per ng DNA) in both their host plants and vector’s tissues (midgut, hemolymph, and salivary glands), while CuLCrV accumulated at significantly lower amounts in its host plant and vector’s tissues [30,36]. Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 transmits SiGMV and CuLCrV, and their circulative tropism in whiteflies could have facilitated binding with different whitefly proteins and putative receptors, leading to increased transcriptional changes [22,72,73]. Bemisia tabaci MED did not transmit the two New World viruses and accumulated at reduced amounts in its tissues; hence, the reduced circulative tropism of New World viruses could have influenced the lower transcriptional responses compared to TYLCV. The differences in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED in terms of acquisition and the competency to inoculate different begomoviruses observed here and in previous studies [74,75] support previous hypotheses surrounding B. tabaci-begomovirus transmission specificity.
The acquisition of three begomoviruses by B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED resulted in transcriptional changes, of which 146 genes were differentially expressed in common between the two invasive B. tabaci species. KEGG analysis annotated only 42 of the 146 genes, and the most represented pathways were classified under metabolic pathways involving carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Virus (hepatitis C virus and HIV) infection and replication have been reported to increase carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in infected CD4+ T cells [76,77]. The majority of the genes associated with lipid metabolism in both B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED were underexpressed, and those associated with carbohydrate metabolism were underexpressed in B. tabaci MEAM1 and partly overexpressed in B. tabaci MED. The results herein are consistent with previous reports of the downregulation of genes associated with lipid metabolism in B. tabaci MEAM1 or MED post acquisition of ToCV, TYLCCNV, and TYLCV, or of TYLCV and ToCV from co-infected plants [44,49]. In contrast, some studies have reported the upregulation of genes associated with lipid metabolism in a circulative and propagative virus study system (tomato spotted wilt orthotospovirus-thrips) [78,79]. Evidence for reduced gene expression associated with carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in viruliferous B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED may offer another line of evidence to counter the hypothesis that begomoviruses replicate in their whitefly vector [80,81]. Nevertheless, the temporary replication of at least one begomovirus (TYLCV) in B. tabaci MEAM1 salivary glands has been reported in a recent study [82]. The replication affected TYLCV accumulation in the salivary glands minimally given the overall virus accumulation within whiteflies.
The weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) has been applied to analyze various biological processes for different organisms [83,84]. In this study, the gene co-expression network analysis of B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults that acquired TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV identified several candidate genes for studying the vector competence of two invasive whiteflies. WGCNA provided scale-free networks between genes within modules, and these modules aided in identifying genes that make B. tabaci MEAM1 a more competent vector of New World begomoviruses (SiGMV and CuLCrV) than its sister cryptic species B. tabaci MED. For instance, among the top four interacting genes identified in the largest module for B. tabaci MEAM1 was the gene Bta15228 (ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 L3, putative). The ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme was required for Notch signaling activation during Drosophila wing development. In addition, this gene was involved in the endocytic trafficking of the Notch protein [85]. This gene could also be involved in the endocytic trafficking of virus particles in B. tabaci MEAM1. In B. tabaci MED, three serine protease genes (Bta03155, Bta03156, and Bta03265) were identified in the largest module among the top four interacting genes. Serine proteases are proteolytic enzymes responsible for digestion, larval-pupal molting, signal transduction, and immune responses in insects [86,87,88,89]. The identification of serine protease genes among the top interacting genes in B. tabaci MED adults could be signatures of heightened innate immune responses such as melanization and the production of antimicrobial peptides triggered by the acquisition of begomoviruses. The ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme and serine protease genes identified in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults, respectively, could be important targets for future investigation.
Similarly, the gene co-expression network analysis for TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV acquired by B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults was examined with the purpose of identifying candidate genes involved in the acquisition of Old and New World begomoviruses. None of the top three interacting genes identified in the largest module for TYLCV, an Old World begomovirus, were functionally annotated. In contrast, a majority of the top three/four interacting genes identified in the largest module for New World begomoviruses—namely, SiGMV and CuLCrV—were functionally annotated. For instance, among the top four interacting genes identified in the largest module for SiGMV was the gene Bta13010—phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein (PEBP). The downregulation of PEBP genes in the Bombyx mori strain resistant to Bombyx mori nucleopolyhedrovirus (BmNPV) upon infection induced enhanced apoptosis, thereby repressing the ability of BmNPV to infect other cells [90]. In B. tabaci MED adults that transmitted TYLCV, the relative expression of PEBP4 was increased significantly and was shown to interact with the TYLCV coat protein, putatively influencing apoptosis and autophagy mechanisms in the whitefly [91]. The potential for the direct role of PEBP4 in B. tabaci MEAM1 capable of transmitting SiGMV remains to be investigated; however, based on the increased relative expression observed in this study and the prior inference, PEBP4 may be conferring a similar function across multiple begomovirus-vector systems. Among the three interacting genes identified in the largest module for CuLCrV was the gene Bta02748 (AP-3 complex subunit mu-1). Adaptin proteins (AP) are membrane-bound heterotetrameric complexes localized in cellular buds and vesicles, and their main role is intracellular trafficking in the trans-Golgi network [92]. The interaction of AP with the human respiratory syncytial virus matrix protein was essential for the latter’s trafficking in the host cells [93]. The regulation of the AP-3 complex subunit mu-1 in the whiteflies that acquired a New World begomovirus could play a role in virus tropism, although this requires functional validation.
KEGG analysis identified many genes implicated in human virus infection that were differentially regulated in viruliferous B. tabaci MEAM1 (21 overexpressed and 9 underexpressed genes) and MED (5 overexpressed and 5 underexpressed genes) adults compared with non-viruliferous counterparts. For example, in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults that acquired SiGMV, Bta14253—protein kinase C was overexpressed compared with non-viruliferous adults. This gene was implicated in the infection of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV), hepatitis B virus, coronavirus, influenza A virus, and human cytomegalovirus by KEGG analysis. Protein kinase C agonists are reported to induce latent HIV expression from viral reservoirs and protect primary CD4+ T cells from HIV infection through the down-modulation of HIV coreceptor expression [94]. Another class of genes, zinc finger proteins (Bta01535 and Bta03437) was underexpressed in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults that acquired TYLCV compared with their non-viruliferous counterparts. In addition, these genes (zinc finger proteins) were also modulated in both directions (up and down) in B. tabaci MED adults that acquired SiGMV compared with their non-viruliferous counterparts. Zinc finger proteins were also implicated in herpes simplex virus 1 infection (HSV-1). The upregulation of zinc finger proteins was reported to play a role in HSV-1 replication and binding to promoter proteins [95]. Five heat shock proteins (Bta00008, Bta02903, Bta03000, Bta06076, and Bta14532) were all, except in one instance, underexpressed in viruliferous whiteflies compared with non-viruliferous counterparts. The increased expression of heat shock proteins was reported after measles virus infection, resulting in increased cytopathic effects [96]. The role of the above-selected genes in both B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults following the acquisition of begomoviruses is unknown and warrants further investigation.
For the successful circulative translocation of begomoviruses in whiteflies, the viral coat protein must interact with putative receptors at the midgut, in the hemolymph, and at the primary salivary glands [22]. A few putative receptors such as the GroEL chaperone protein, heat shock proteins, midgut proteins, peptidyl-prolyl isomerase protein, and peptidoglycan recognition protein gene were identified in previous studies [23,24,25,26,27]. In addition to those, this study identified other possible putative receptors in the cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction and cell adhesion molecule pathways that may play a role in the circulative movement of begomoviruses in their vectors, and they include Bta04818—type I serine/threonine kinase receptor and Bta07388—syndecan. Serine/threonine kinase, an anchored protein-associated kinase in mammalian cells, was reported as an important cellular component in regulating the entry or clathrin-mediated endocytosis of rabies virus (RABV) [97]. Syndecan is a cell surface heparan sulphate proteoglycan (HSPGs), which plays several roles including virus (hepatitis E virus and herpes simplex virus) attachment and entry [98]. Hepatitis E virus, human papillomavirus, and HIV are some of the viruses reported to bind to cell surface HSPGs for their initial attachment to host cells [99,100,101]. The upregulation of the type I serine/threonine kinase receptor and syndecan genes in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults that acquired SiGMV could be associated with their binding to viral DNA, thereby enabling circulative translocation. Aminopeptidase N is another gene that was differentially expressed (underexpressed) in both B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults that acquired TYLCV. This gene, a plant virus receptor, was overexpressed in aphids and thrips that acquired pea enation mosaic virus and tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), respectively [78,102]. Whether the aminopeptidase N gene plays any role in begomovirus (TYLCV) reception in either B. tabaci MEAM1 or MED adults is unknown at this juncture.
Whiteflies have an innate immune system that has been documented against pathogens [103,104]. The RNA interference (RNAi) pathway is the major mechanism insects use against virus infection [43]. In addition, other innate antimicrobial pathways such as Imd, Toll, JAK-STAT, phagocytosis, apoptosis, and proteolysis were reported to play crucial roles in insects’ (Diptera and Lepidoptera) antiviral responses [105,106,107]. A majority of the genes associated with innate immune pathways in the viruliferous B. tabaci MEAM1 adults were overexpressed, as opposed to the viruliferous B. tabaci MED adults, where they were underexpressed (Table 4 and Table 5). For instance, several cathepsin B genes were identified in both B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults. These genes were associated with apoptosis and immune system pathways such as the NOD-like receptor signaling pathway and antigen processing and presentation pathway. Further, cathepsins are implicated to play a role in virus transmission [108,109]. All of the nine genes identified in B. tabaci MED were underexpressed, while four genes were overexpressed and three were underexpressed in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults (Table 4). Similar to our findings, several studies have identified the differential expression (both up- and downregulation) of genes such as cathepsins associated with innate immune pathways in whiteflies following begomovirus or crinivirus acquisition [44,45,46,47,49,51]. The contrasting differential expression of genes under the innate immune pathways such as cathepsins in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED identified in this study possibly highlights differences in the immune responses to virus acquisition or other vector-virus interactions between the two B. tabaci cryptic species. Ras-like GTP-binding proteins were other immune response genes identified only in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults that acquired TYLCV or SIGMV. Like B. tabaci MEAM1 adults that acquired TYLCV or SiGMV, ras-like GTP-binding proteins were overexpressed in thrips that were exposed to TSWV [78]. The upregulation of these genes in viruliferous B. tabaci MEAM1 adults could be another mechanism evolved by whiteflies to counter begomoviruses.
The exposure to begomoviruses, especially TYLCV and CuLCrV, affected the expression of several fitness-related genes in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED. This study identified the up- and downregulation of genes associated with egg production, spermatogenesis, and longevity in whiteflies that acquired begomoviruses. For example, Bta06648—gametocyte-specific factor 1 (GTSF1) gene was overexpressed in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults that acquired TYLCV. In Drosophila, this gene was essential for P-element-induced wimpy testis-interacting RNA-mediated transcriptional repression, the histone mediated repression of transposons, and their neighboring genes in the ovary [110]. Similarly, in mice, this gene was essential for spermatogenesis and transposon suppression in mouse testes [111]. The upregulation of the GTSF1 gene in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults that acquired TYLCV may increase the development of sperm cells in their male reproductive organs, thereby influencing reproduction. Two egg production associated genes—vitellogenin (Bta07852 and Bta11903) were underexpressed in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults that acquired TYLCV, whereas one vitellogenin gene (Bta11903) was overexpressed in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults that acquired CuLCrV. Further, most genes associated with aging pathways in viruliferous B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults were underexpressed. Positive, neutral, and negative effects of begomovirus infection on whitefly fecundity and longevity have been reported [42,112,113,114]. Evidence at the transcriptome level for the underexpression of the egg production gene in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults that acquired TYLCV, as indicated in this study, is consistent with the Pan et al. [114] study. That study reported that B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED that acquired TYLCV produced fewer eggs on cotton than their non-viruliferous counterparts [114]. In contrast, the overexpression of oviposition-related genes in B. tabaci MEAM1 that acquired CuLCrV may indicate higher fecundity, but this assumption was not supported by Gautam et al. [42]. There were no significant differences in the fecundity of B. tabaci MEAM1 females that acquired CuLCrV and their non-viruliferous counterparts [42]. Gautam et al. [36] demonstrated that the fitness effects of both B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED did not vary within each host species, and in this study, host effects were eliminated by gut clearing for 72 h. Consequently, this study predominantly provides evidence at the transcriptome level for some of the begomoviruses-induced (predominantly direct) macro-level fitness effects on their vectors—B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED.

5. Conclusions

The acquisition of begomoviruses by two invasive whiteflies induced variable transcriptional responses. Increased transcriptional changes were observed in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults compared to B. tabaci MED adults. Although the three plant viruses belong to the same genus, Begomovirus, the gene expression patterns varied between them. The gene co-expression network analysis for B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED that acquired begomoviruses revealed some candidate genes such as the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, which could be involved in the endocytic trafficking of virus particles. In addition, other possible putative receptors such as type I serine/threonine kinase receptor and syndecan were identified, and these could be involved in the circulative movement of begomoviruses in their vectors. Several genes implicated in the infection of human viruses were differentially regulated in viruliferous whiteflies. Furthermore, under the innate immune pathways, the contrasting differential expression of genes such as cathepsins occurred between B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults that acquired the begomoviruses. The differences in the immune responses of B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults upon virus acquisition possibly highlight their unique defense mechanisms against begomoviruses. Multiple genes were identified that may play a role in the New World begomovirus transmission. These could be important targets to investigate in the future. This study also provides evidence at the transcriptome level for some of the observed macro-level fitness effects of begomoviruses on their whitefly vectors.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells11132060/s1, Figure S1: TYLCV weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Figure S2: SiGMV weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Figure S3: CuLCrV weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Table S1: Endpoint PCR and qPCR primers used in this study. Table S2: Pearson’s correlation coefficients for multiple biological replicates. Table S3: RT-qPCR concordant validation for selected differentially expressed genes from RNA-Seq data. Table S4: KEGG annotations and pathway analysis for differential expressed genes in viruliferous versus non-viruliferous whiteflies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.D. and R.S.; methodology, H.M. and S.G.; software, H.M. and M.A.C.; validation, H.M. and S.G.; formal analysis, H.M. and R.S.; investigation, H.M. and S.G.; resources, R.S.; data curation, H.M. and M.A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, H.M.; writing—review and editing, H.M., S.G., M.A.C., B.D., J.K.B., S.A. and R.S.; visualization, H.M. and M.A.C.; supervision, B.D. and R.S.; project administration, R.S.; funding acquisition, R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the USDA-Specialty Crops Research Initiative (USDA NIFA SCRI grant 2018-51181-28420) and by the USDA Non-Assistance Cooperative Agreement #58-6080-9-006 to the University of Georgia.

Data Availability Statement

The raw read sequences were submitted to NCBI with the BioProject accession number PRJNA796977.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Gabrielle LaTora and Sarah Bragg for their technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brown, J.K.; Frohlich, D.R.; Rosell, R.C. The sweetpotato or silverleaf whiteflies: Biotypes of Bemisia tabaci or species complex? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1995, 40, 511–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. De Barro, P.J.; Liu, S.-S.; Boykin, L.M.; Dinsdale, A.B. Bemisia tabaci: A statement of species status. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2011, 56, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ghosh, S.; Ghanim, M. Factors Determining Transmission of Persistent Viruses by Bemisia tabaci and Emergence of New Virus–Vector Relationships. Viruses 2021, 13, 1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, G.; Yu, F.X.; Kim, Y.C.; Meng, Z.; Naipauer, J.; Looney, D.J.; Liu, X.; Gutkind, J.S.; Mesri, E.A.; Guan, K.L. Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus promotes tumorigenesis by modulating the Hippo pathway. Oncogene 2015, 34, 3536–3546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Zerbini, F.M.; Briddon, R.W.; Idris, A.; Martin, D.P.; Moriones, E.; Navas-Castillo, J.; Rivera-Bustamante, R.; Roumagnac, P.; Varsani, A. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Geminiviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2017, 98, 131–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Byrne, D.N.; Bellows, T.S.J. Whitefly biology. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1991, 36, 431–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sseruwagi, P.; Legg, J.P.; Maruthi, M.N.; Colvin, J.; Rey, M.E.C.; Brown, J.K. Genetic diversity of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) populations and presence of the B biotype and a non-B biotype that can induce silverleaf symptoms in squash, in Uganda. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2005, 147, 253–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brown, J.K. Phylogenetic biology of the Bemisia tabaci sibling species group. In Bemisia: Bionomics and Management of a Global Pest; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherland, 2010; pp. 31–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gill, R.J.; Brown, J.K. Systematics of Bemisia and Bemisia Relatives: Can Molecular Techniques Solve the Bemisia tabaci Complex Conundrum—A Taxonomist’s Viewpoint. In Bemisia: Bionomics and Management of a Global Pest; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherland, 2010; pp. 5–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. de Moya, R.S.; Brown, J.K.; Sweet, A.D.; Kimberly, K.K.; Paredes-Montero, J.R.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Johnson, K.P. Nuclear orthologs derived from whole genome sequencing indicate cryptic diversity in the Bemisia tabaci (Insecta: Aleyrodidae) complex of whiteflies. Diversity 2019, 11, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Dinsdale, A.; Cook, L.; Riginos, C.; Buckley, Y.M.; De Barro, P. Refined global analysis of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodoidea: Aleyrodidae) mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 to identify species level genetic boundaries. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2010, 103, 196–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, S.-S.; Colvin, J.; De Barro, P.J. Species concepts as applied to the whitefly Bemisia tabaci systematics: How many species are there? J. Integr. Agric. 2012, 11, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mugerwa, H.; Colvin, J.; Alicai, T.; Omongo, C.A.; Kabaalu, R.; Visendi, P.; Sseruwagi, P.; Seal, S.E. Genetic diversity of whitefly (Bemisia spp.) on crop and uncultivated plants in Uganda: Implications for the control of this devastating pest species complex in Africa. J. Pest Sci. 2021, 1, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jones, D.R. Plant viruses transmitted by whiteflies. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2003, 109, 195–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dennehy, T.J.; Degain, B.A.; Harpold, V.S.; Brown, J.K.; Morin, S.; Fabrick, J.A.; Byrne, F.J.; Nichols, R.L. New Challenges to Management of Whitefly Resistance to Insecticides in Arizona; University of Arizona Cooperative Extension: Tucson, AZ, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu, S.-S.; De Barro, P.J.; Xu, J.; Luan, J.-B.; Zang, L.-S.; Ruan, Y.-M.; Wan, F.-H. Asymmetric mating interactions drive widespread invasion and displacement in a whitefly. Science 2007, 318, 1769–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chi, Y.; Pan, L.-L.; Bouvaine, S.; Fan, Y.-Y.; Liu, Y.-Q.; Liu, S.-S.; Seal, S.; Wang, X.-W. Differential transmission of Sri Lankan cassava mosaic virus by three cryptic species of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci complex. Virology 2020, 540, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mugerwa, H.; Wang, H.; Sseruwagi, P.; Seal, S.; Colvin, J. Whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism and mating compatibility studies reveal the presence of distinct species in sub-Saharan Africa Bemisia tabaci whiteflies. Insect Sci. 2020, 28, 1553–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Adkins, S.; Polston, J.E.; Turechek, W.W. Cucurbit leaf crumple virus identified in common bean in Florida. Plant Dis. 2009, 93, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moriones, E.; Navas-Castillo, J. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus, an emerging virus complex causing epidemics worldwide. Virus Res. 2000, 71, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Durham, T.C.; Baker, C.; Jones, L.; Snyder, L.U. First report of Sida golden mosaic virus infecting snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Florida. Plant Dis. 2010, 94, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Czosnek, H.; Hariton-Shalev, A.; Sobol, I.; Gorovits, R.; Ghanim, M. The incredible journey of Begomoviruses in their whitefly vector. Viruses 2017, 9, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gotz, M.; Popovski, S.; Kollenberg, M.; Gorovits, R.; Brown, J.K.; Cicero, J.M.; Czosnek, H.; Winter, S.; Ghanim, M. Implication of Bemisia tabaci Heat Shock Protein 70 in Begomovirus-Whitefly Interactions. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 13241–13252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Wang, Z.Z.; Shi, M.; Huang, Y.C.; Wang, X.W.; Stanley, D.; Chen, X.X. A peptidoglycan recognition protein acts in whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) immunity and involves in Begomovirus acquisition. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Rana, V.S.; Popli, S.; Saurav, G.K.; Raina, H.S.; Chaubey, R.; Ramamurthy, V.V.; Rajagopal, R. A Bemisia tabaci midgut protein interacts with begomoviruses and plays a role in virus transmission. Cell. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 663–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Kanakala, S.; Ghanim, M. Implication of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci cyclophilin B protein in the transmission of tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Rana, V.S.; Singh, S.T.; Priya, N.G.; Kumar, J.; Rajagopal, R. Arsenophonus GroEL interacts with CLCuV and is localized in midgut and salivary gland of whitefly B. tabaci. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Costa, H.S.; Brown, J.; Sivasupramaniam, S.; Bird, J. Regional distribution, insecticide resistance and reciprocal crosses between the A-biotype and B-biotype of Bemisia tabaci. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 1993, 14, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mckenzie, C.L.; Osborne, L.S. Bemisia tabaci MED (Q biotype) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Florida is on the Move to Residential Landscapes and May Impact Open-Field Agriculture. Fla. Entomol. 2017, 100, 481–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gautam, S.; Crossley, M.S.; Dutta, B.; Coolong, T.; Simmons, A.M.; da Silva, A.; Snyder, W.E.; Srinivasan, R. Low genetic variability in Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 populations within farmscapes of Georgia, USA. Insects 2020, 11, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. McKenzie, C.L.; Sparks, A.N.; Roberts, P.; Oetting, R.D.; Osborne, L.S. Survey of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in agricultural ecosystems in Georgia1. J. Entomol. Sci. 2020, 55, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dutta, B.; Myer, B.; Coolong, T.; Srinivasan, R.; Sparks, A. Whitefly-Transmitted Plant Viruses in South Georgia. UGA Coop. Ext. Bull. 2018, 1507, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  33. Agarwal, G.; Kavalappara, S.R.; Gautam, S.; da Silva, A.; Simmons, A.; Srinivasan, R.; Dutta, B. Field screen and genotyping of Phaseolus vulgaris against two Begomoviruses in Georgia, USA. Insects 2021, 12, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, M.; Hu, J.; Xu, F.-C.; Liu, S.-S. Transmission of Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus by two invasive biotypes and a Chinese indigenous biotype of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2010, 56, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ning, W.; Shi, X.; Liu, B.; Pan, H.; Wei, W.; Zeng, Y.; Sun, X.; Xie, W.; Wang, S.; Wu, Q.; et al. Transmission of tomato yellow leaf curl virus by Bemisia tabaci as affected by whitefly sex and biotype. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gautam, S.; Mugerwa, H.; Buck, J.W.; Dutta, B.; Coolong, T.; Adkins, S.; Srinivasan, R. Differential Transmission of Old and New World Begomoviruses by Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) and Mediterranean (MED) Cryptic Species of Bemisia tabaci. Viruses 2022, 14, 1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sisterson, M.S. Effects of Insect-Vector Preference for Healthy or Infected Plants on Pathogen Spread: Insights from a Model. J. Econ. Entomol. 2008, 101, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mauck, K.; Bosque-Pérez, N.A.; Eigenbrode, S.D.; De Moraes, C.M.; Mescher, M.C. Transmission mechanisms shape pathogen effects on host-vector interactions: Evidence from plant viruses. Funct. Ecol. 2012, 26, 1162–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Legarrea, S.; Barman, A.; Marchant, W.; Diffie, S.; Srinivasan, R. Temporal effects of a begomovirus infection and host plant resistance on the preference and development of an insect vector, Bemisia tabaci, and implications for epidemics. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0142114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Li, M.; Liu, J.; Liu, S.-S. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus infection of tomato does not affect the performance of the Q and ZHJ2 biotypes of the viral vector Bemisia tabaci. Insect Sci. 2011, 18, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, J.; Li, M.; Li, J.; Huang, C.; Zhou, X.; Xu, F.; Liu, S. Viral infection of tobacco plants improves performance of Bemisia tabaci but more so for an invasive than for an indigenous biotype of the whitefly. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2010, 11, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Gautam, S.; Gadhave, K.R.; Buck, J.W.; Dutta, B.; Coolong, T.; Adkins, S.; Srinivasan, R. Virus-virus interactions in a plant host and in a hemipteran vector: Implications for vector fitness and virus epidemics. Virus Res. 2020, 286, 198069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Catto, M.A.; Mugerwa, H.; Myers, B.K.; Pandey, S.; Dutta, B.; Srinivasan, R. A review on transcriptional responses of interactions between insect vectors and plant viruses. Cells 2022, 11, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Luan, J.-B.; Li, J.-M.; Varela, N.; Wang, Y.-L.; Li, F.-F.; Bao, Y.-Y.; Zhang, C.-X.; Liu, S.-S.; Wang, X.-W. Global analysis of the transcriptional response of whitefly to tomato yellow leaf curl China virus reveals the relationship of coevolved adaptations. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 3330–3340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kaur, N.; Chen, W.; Zheng, Y.; Hasegawa, D.K.; Ling, K.S.; Fei, Z.; Wintermantel, W.M. Transcriptome analysis of the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 during feeding on tomato infected with the crinivirus, Tomato chlorosis virus, identifies a temporal shift in gene expression and differential regulation of novel orphan genes. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kaur, N.; Chen, W.; Fei, Z.; Wintermantel, W.M. Differences in gene expression in whitefly associated with CYSDV-infected and virus-free melon, and comparison with expression in whiteflies fed on ToCV- and TYLCV-infected tomato. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hasegawa, D.K.; Chen, W.; Zheng, Y.; Kaur, N.; Wintermantel, W.M.; Simmons, A.M.; Fei, Z.; Ling, K.S. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals networks of genes activated in the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci when fed on tomato plants infected with Tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Virology 2018, 513, 52–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Li, M.; Zhao, J.; Su, Y.-L. Transcriptome Analysis of Gene Expression Profiles of Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus-Infected Whiteflies over Different Viral Acquisition Access Periods. Insects 2020, 11, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ding, T.-B.; Li, J.; Chen, E.-H.; Niu, J.-Z.; Chu, D. Transcriptome Profiling of the Whitefly Bemisia tabaci MED in Response to Single Infection of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus, Tomato chlorosis virus, and Their Co-infection. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Luan, J.B.; Wang, Y.L.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.W.; Liu, S.S. Detoxification activity and energy cost is attenuated in whiteflies feeding on Tomato yellow leaf curl China virus-infected tobacco plants. Insect Mol. Biol. 2013, 22, 597–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, W.; Hasegawa, D.K.; Kaur, N.; Kliot, A.; Pinheiro, P.V.; Luan, J.; Stensmyr, M.C.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, W.; Sun, H.; et al. The draft genome of whitefly Bemisia tabaci MEAM1, a global crop pest, provides novel insights into virus transmission, host adaptation, and insecticide resistance. BMC Biol. 2016, 14, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Geng, L.; Qian, L.X.; Shao, R.X.; Liu, Y.Q.; Liu, S.S.; Wang, X.W. Transcriptome profiling of whitefly guts in response to Tomato yellow leaf curl virus infection. Virol. J. 2018, 15, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Wang, B.; Wang, L.; Chen, F.; Yang, X.; Ding, M.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, S.S.; Wang, X.W.; Zhou, X. MicroRNA profiling of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Aisa Minor i following the acquisition of Tomato yellow leaf curl China virus Plant viruses. Virol. J. 2016, 13, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Nekkanti, A.; Chakraborty, P.; Ghosh, A.; Iquebal, M.A.; Jaiswal, S.; Baranwal, V.K. Transcriptomic Changes of Bemisia tabaci Asia II 1 Induced by Chilli Leaf Curl Virus Trigger Infection and Circulation in Its Vector. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Frohlich, D.R.; Torres-Jerez, I.D.; Bedford, D.; Markham, G.P.; Brown, J.K. A phylogeographical analysis of the Bemisia tabaci species complex based on mitochondrial DNA markers. Mol. Ecol. 1999, 8, 1683–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Mugerwa, H.; Seal, S.; Wang, H.-L.; Patel, M.V.; Kabaalu, R.; Omongo, C.A.; Alicai, T.; Tairo, F.; Ndunguru, J.; Sseruwagi, P.; et al. African ancestry of New World, Bemisia tabaci-whitefly species. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Kent, W.J. BLAT-The BLAST-Like Alignment Tool. Genome Res. 2002, 12, 656–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glöckner, F.O. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Xie, W.; Chen, C.; Yang, Z.; Guo, L.; Yang, X.; Wang, D.; Chen, M.; Huang, J.; Wen, Y.; Zeng, Y.; et al. Genome sequencing of the sweetpotato whitefly Bemisia tabaci MED/Q. Gigascience 2017, 6, gix018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Dobin, A.; Gingeras, T.R. Mapping RNA-seq Reads with STAR. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2015, 51, 11.14.1–11.14.19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1995, 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kanehisa, M.; Sato, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Furumichi, M.; Tanabe, M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D457–D462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Götz, S.; García-Gómez, J.M.; Terol, J.; Williams, T.D.; Nagaraj, S.H.; Nueda, M.J.; Robles, M.; Talón, M.; Dopazo, J.; Conesa, A. High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, 3420–3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. R Core Team, R. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foubdation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2013; Volume 1, ISBN 3900051070. [Google Scholar]
  66. Supek, F.; Bošnjak, M.; Škunca, N.; Šmuc, T. REVIGO Summarizes and Visualizes Long Lists of Gene Ontology Terms. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Langfelder, P.; Horvath, S. WGCNA: An R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sinisterra, X.H.; McKenzie, C.L.; Hunter, W.B.; Powell, C.A.; Shatters, R.G. Differential transcriptional activity of plant-pathogenic begomoviruses in their whitefly vector (Bemisia tabaci, Gennadius: Hemiptera Aleyroadidae). J. Gen. Virol. 2005, 86, 1525–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, J.-M.; Ruan, Y.-M.; Li, F.-F.; Liu, S.-S.; Wang, X.-W. Gene expression profiling of the whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) Middle East—Asia Minor 1 feeding on healthy and Tomato yellow leaf curl China virus-infected tobacco. Insect Sci. 2011, 18, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bedford, I.D.; Briddon, R.W.; Brown, J.K.; Rosell, R.C.; Markham, P.G. Geminivirus transmission and biological characterisation of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) biotypes from different geographic regions. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1994, 125, 311–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hogenhout, S.A.; Ammar, E.; Whitfield, A.E.; Redinbaugh, M.G. Insect Vector Interactions with Persistently Transmitted Viruses. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2008, 46, 327–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Idris, A.M.; Smith, S.E.; Brown, J.K. Ingestion, Transmission, and Persistence of Chino del Tomate Virus (CdTV), a New World Begomovirus, by Old and New World Biotypes of the Whitefly Vector Bemisia tabaci. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2001, 139, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bello, V.H.; Watanabe, L.F.M.; Santos, B.R.; Marubayashi, J.M.; Yuki, V.A.; De Marchi, B.R.; Pavan, M.A.; Krause-Sakate, R. Evidence for increased efficiency of virus transmission by populations of Mediterranean species of Bemisia tabaci with high Hamiltonella prevalence. Phytoparasitica 2019, 47, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Maynard, N.D.; Gutschow, M.V.; Birch, E.W.; Covert, M.W. The virus as metabolic engineer. Biotechnol. J. 2010, 5, 686–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Mesquita, I.; Estaquier, J. Viral manipulation of the host metabolic network. Exp. Suppl. 2018, 109, 377–401. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  78. Shrestha, A.; Champagne, D.E.; Culbreath, A.K.; Rotenberg, D.; Whitfield, A.E.; Srinivasan, R. Transcriptome changes associated with Tomato spotted wilt virus infection in various life stages of its thrips vector, Frankliniella fusca (Hinds). J. Gen. Virol. 2017, 98, 2156–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, P.; Li, W.; Zhang, J.; Huang, F.; Yang, J.; Bei, Y.; Lu, Y. De novo transcriptome sequencing in Frankliniella occidentalis to identify genes involved in plant virus transmission and insecticide resistance. Genomics 2013, 101, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Becker, N.; Rimbaud, L.; Chiroleu, F.; Reynaud, B.; Thebaud, G.; Lett, J.M. Rapid accumulation and low degradation: Key parameters of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus persistence in its insect vector Bemisia tabaci. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sánchez-Campos, S.; Rodríguez-Negrete, E.A.; Cruzado, L.; Grande-Pérez, A.; Bejarano, E.R.; Navas-Castillo, J.; Moriones, E. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus: No evidence for replication in the insect vector Bemisia tabaci. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. He, Y.Z.; Wang, Y.M.; Yin, T.Y.; Fiallo-Olivé, E.; Liu, Y.Q.; Hanley-Bowdoin, L.; Wang, X.W. A plant DNA virus replicates in the salivary glands of its insect vector via recruitment of host DNA synthesis machinery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 16928–16937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Han, J.; Rotenberg, D. Integration of transcriptomics and network analysis reveals co-expressed genes in Frankliniella occidentalis larval guts that respond to tomato spotted wilt virus infection. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tian, J.; Zhan, H.; Dewer, Y.; Zhang, B.; Qu, C.; Luo, C.; Li, F.; Yang, S. Whitefly Network Analysis Reveals Gene Modules Involved in Host Plant Selection, Development and Evolution. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 656649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, F.; Chen, Y.; Shen, J.; Zhang, J. The Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme UbcD1 is Required for Notch Signaling Activation during Drosophila Wing Development. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lin, H.; Xia, X.; Yu, L.; Vasseur, L.; Gurr, G.M.; Yao, F.; Yang, G.; You, M. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of serine proteases and homologs in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Yang, W.J.; Chen, C.X.; Yan, Y.; Xu, K.K.; Li, C. Clip-Domain Serine Protease Gene (LsCLIP3) Is Essential for Larval–Pupal Molting and Immunity in Lasioderma serricorne. Front. Physiol. 2020, 10, 1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Wang, H.C.; Wang, Q.H.; Bhowmick, B.; Li, Y.X.; Han, Q. Functional characterization of two clip domain serine proteases in innate immune responses of Aedes aegypti. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Shakeel, M.; Xu, X.; De Mandal, S.; Jin, F. Role of serine protease inhibitors in insect-host-pathogen interactions. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2019, 102, e21556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Chen, L.; Shen, Y.; Yang, R.; Wu, X.; Hu, W.; Shen, G. Bombyx mori nucleopolyhedrovirus (BmNPV) Bm64 is required for BV production and per os infection. Virol. J. 2015, 12, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Wang, S.; Guo, H.; Zhu-Salzman, K.; Ge, F.; Sun, Y. PEBP balances apoptosis and autophagy in whitefly upon arbovirus infection. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Shin, J.; Nile, A.; Oh, J.W. Role of adaptin protein complexes in intracellular trafficking and their impact on diseases. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 8259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ward, C.; Maselko, M.; Lupfer, C.; Prescott, M.; Pastey, M.K. Interaction of the Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus matrix protein with cellular adaptor protein complex 3 plays a critical role in trafficking. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Jiang, G.; Dandekar, S. Targeting NF-κB signaling with protein Kinase C agonists as an emerging strategy for combating HIV latency. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 2015, 31, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kamakura, M.; Goshima, F.; Luo, C.; Kimura, H.; Nishiyama, Y. Herpes simplex virus induces the marked up-regulation of the zinc finger transcriptional factor INSM1, which modulates the expression and localization of the immediate early protein ICP0. Virol. J. 2011, 8, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Liu, C.; Erlichman, C.; Mcdonald, C.J.; Ingle, J.N.; Zollman, P.; Iankov, I.; Russell, S.J.; Galanis, E.; Author, G.T. Heat shock protein inhibitors increase the efficacy of measles virotherapy NIH Public Access Author Manuscript. Gene Ther. 2008, 15, 1024–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Shuai, L.; Ma, X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, R.; Chen, W.; Wang, X.; Ge, J.; Wen, Z.; et al. The serine/threonine kinase AP2-associated kinase 1 plays an important role in rabies virus entry. Viruses 2019, 12, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Teng, Y.H.F.; Aquino, R.S.; Park, P.W. Molecular functions of syndecan-1 in disease. Matrix Biol. 2012, 31, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Kalia, M.; Chandra, V.; Rahman, S.A.; Sehgal, D.; Jameel, S. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans are required for cellular binding of the Hepatitis E Virus ORF2 capsid protein and for viral Infection. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 12714–12724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Saphire, A.C.S.; Bobardt, M.D.; Zhang, Z.; David, G.; Gallay, P.A. Syndecans serve as attachment receptors for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 on macrophages. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 9187–9200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Shafti-keramat, S.; Handisurya, A.; Meneguzzi, G.; Slupetzky, K.; Kirnbauer, R.; Kriehuber, E. Different heparan sulfate proteoglycans serve as cellular receptors for human Papillomaviruses. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 13125–13135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Liu, S.; Sivakumar, S.; Sparks, W.O.; Miller, W.A.; Bonning, B.C. A peptide that binds the pea aphid gut impedes entry of Pea enation mosaic virus into the aphid hemocoel. Virology 2010, 401, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Lemaitre, B.; Hoffmann, J. The host defense of Drosophila melanogaster. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2007, 25, 697–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Kanost, M.R.; Jiang, H.; Yu, X.Q. Innate immune responses of a lepidopteran insect, Manduca sexta. Immunol. Rev. 2004, 198, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Strand, M.R. The insect cellular immune response. Insect Sci. 2008, 15, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Jiang, H.; Vilcinskas, A.; Kanost, M.R. Immunity in lepidopteran insects. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010, 708, 181–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Rosales, C. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Insect Immunity. In Insect Physiology and Ecology; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  108. Kubo, Y.; Hayashi, H.; Matsuyama, T.; Sato, H.; Yamamoto, N. Retrovirus entry by endocytosis and cathepsin proteases. Adv. Virol. 2012, 2012, 640894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Sim, S.; Ramirez, J.L.; Dimopoulos, G. Dengue virus infection of the aedes aegypti salivary gland and chemosensory apparatus induces genes that modulate infection and blood-feeding behavior. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Huntriss, J.; Lu, J.; Hemmings, K.; Bayne, R.; Anderson, R.; Rutherford, A.; Balen, A.; Elder, K.; Picton, H.M. Isolation and expression of the human gametocyte-specific factor 1 gene (GTSF1) in fetal ovary, oocytes, and preimplantation embryos. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2017, 34, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Yoshimura, T.; Toyoda, S.; Kuramochi-Miyagawa, S.; Miyazaki, T.; Miyazaki, S.; Tashiro, F.; Yamato, E.; Nakano, T.; Miyazaki, J. ichi Gtsf1/Cue110, a gene encoding a protein with two copies of a CHHC Zn-finger motif, is involved in spermatogenesis and retrotransposon suppression in murine testes. Dev. Biol. 2009, 335, 216–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Jiu, M.; Zhou, X.-P.; Tong, L.; Xu, J.; Yang, X.; Wan, F.-H.; Liu, S.-S. Vector-virus mutualism accelerates population increase of an invasive whitefly. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Sidhu, J.S.; Mann, R.S.; Butter, N.S. Deleterious effects of cotton leaf curl virus on longevity and fecundity of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius). J. Entomol. 2009, 6, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Pan, H.; Chu, D.; Liu, B.; Shi, X.; Guo, L.; Xie, W.; Carrière, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y. Differential effects of an exotic plant virus on its two closely related vectors. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) and Mediterranean (MED) adults provided with an acquisition access period of 72 h on TYLCV-infected versus non-infected tomato plants, SiGMV-infected versus non-infected prickly sida plants, or CuLCrV-infected versus non-infected squash plants: (a) Normalized Venn diagram showing unique and common DEGs in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults after the acquisition of TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV; (b) Normalized Venn diagram showing unique and common DEGs in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults after the acquisition of TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV; (c) Normalized Venn diagram showing unique and common DEGs in B. tabaci MED adults after the acquisition of TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV; (d) Number of DEGs in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED detected between viruliferous (TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV ) and non-viruliferous insects.
Figure 1. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) and Mediterranean (MED) adults provided with an acquisition access period of 72 h on TYLCV-infected versus non-infected tomato plants, SiGMV-infected versus non-infected prickly sida plants, or CuLCrV-infected versus non-infected squash plants: (a) Normalized Venn diagram showing unique and common DEGs in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults after the acquisition of TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV; (b) Normalized Venn diagram showing unique and common DEGs in B. tabaci MEAM1 adults after the acquisition of TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV; (c) Normalized Venn diagram showing unique and common DEGs in B. tabaci MED adults after the acquisition of TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV; (d) Number of DEGs in B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED detected between viruliferous (TYLCV, SiGMV, or CuLCrV ) and non-viruliferous insects.
Cells 11 02060 g001
Figure 2. Mean difference plots of differentially expressed genes in B. tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) and Mediterranean (MED) adults provided with an acquisition access period of 72 h on virus-infected versus non-infected plants. Plots of log-intensity ratios (differences) versus log-intensity averages (means). CPM indicates counts per million reads. (a) B. tabaci MEAM1 adults with versus without TYLCV; (b) B. tabaci MEAM1 adults with versus without SiGMV; (c) B. tabaci MEAM1 adults with versus without CuLCrV; (d) B. tabaci MED adults with versus without TYLCV; (e) B. tabaci MED adults with versus without SiGMV; and (f) B. tabaci MED adults with versus without CuLCrV. Black, red, and blue dots are indicative of genes not significantly expressed, significantly overexpressed, or significantly underexpressed, respectively.
Figure 2. Mean difference plots of differentially expressed genes in B. tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) and Mediterranean (MED) adults provided with an acquisition access period of 72 h on virus-infected versus non-infected plants. Plots of log-intensity ratios (differences) versus log-intensity averages (means). CPM indicates counts per million reads. (a) B. tabaci MEAM1 adults with versus without TYLCV; (b) B. tabaci MEAM1 adults with versus without SiGMV; (c) B. tabaci MEAM1 adults with versus without CuLCrV; (d) B. tabaci MED adults with versus without TYLCV; (e) B. tabaci MED adults with versus without SiGMV; and (f) B. tabaci MED adults with versus without CuLCrV. Black, red, and blue dots are indicative of genes not significantly expressed, significantly overexpressed, or significantly underexpressed, respectively.
Cells 11 02060 g002
Figure 3. Scatterplots showing (a) biological process, (b) molecular function, and (c) cellular component gene ontology terms common between Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 and Mediterranean following the acquisition of viruses. Cluster representatives in a two-dimensional space were derived by applying multidimensional scaling to a matrix of the gene ontology terms’ semantic similarities. Bubble color indicates the p-value, and size indicates the frequency of the GO term in the underlying GOA database.
Figure 3. Scatterplots showing (a) biological process, (b) molecular function, and (c) cellular component gene ontology terms common between Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 and Mediterranean following the acquisition of viruses. Cluster representatives in a two-dimensional space were derived by applying multidimensional scaling to a matrix of the gene ontology terms’ semantic similarities. Bubble color indicates the p-value, and size indicates the frequency of the GO term in the underlying GOA database.
Cells 11 02060 g003
Figure 4. Scatterplots showing (a) biological process, (b) molecular function, and (c) cellular component gene ontology terms for Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 following the acquisition of viruses. Cluster representatives in a two-dimensional space were derived by applying multidimensional scaling to a matrix of the gene ontology terms’ semantic similarities. Bubble color indicates the p-value, and size indicates the frequency of the GO term in the underlying GOA database.
Figure 4. Scatterplots showing (a) biological process, (b) molecular function, and (c) cellular component gene ontology terms for Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 following the acquisition of viruses. Cluster representatives in a two-dimensional space were derived by applying multidimensional scaling to a matrix of the gene ontology terms’ semantic similarities. Bubble color indicates the p-value, and size indicates the frequency of the GO term in the underlying GOA database.
Cells 11 02060 g004
Figure 5. Scatterplots showing (a) biological process, (b) molecular function, and (c) cellular component gene ontology terms for Bemisia tabaci Mediterranean following the acquisition of viruses. Cluster representatives in a two-dimensional space were derived by applying multidimensional scaling to a matrix of the gene ontology terms’ semantic similarities. Bubble color indicates the p-value, and size indicates the frequency of the GO term in the underlying GOA database.
Figure 5. Scatterplots showing (a) biological process, (b) molecular function, and (c) cellular component gene ontology terms for Bemisia tabaci Mediterranean following the acquisition of viruses. Cluster representatives in a two-dimensional space were derived by applying multidimensional scaling to a matrix of the gene ontology terms’ semantic similarities. Bubble color indicates the p-value, and size indicates the frequency of the GO term in the underlying GOA database.
Cells 11 02060 g005
Figure 6. Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) adults weighted gene co-expression network analysis. (a) Dendrogram clustering showing eight modules of co-expressed genes. A total of 784 genes are represented in this network, with 454 genes belonging to MEturquoise. (b) Heatmap showing the correlation of module eigengenes in relation to B. tabaci MEAM1 that acquired TYLCV (BT), SiGMV (BS), or CuLCrV (BC). (c) Top 30 genes from MEturquoise with connectivity lines (blue) associated with the top 5% of the connected genes.
Figure 6. Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) adults weighted gene co-expression network analysis. (a) Dendrogram clustering showing eight modules of co-expressed genes. A total of 784 genes are represented in this network, with 454 genes belonging to MEturquoise. (b) Heatmap showing the correlation of module eigengenes in relation to B. tabaci MEAM1 that acquired TYLCV (BT), SiGMV (BS), or CuLCrV (BC). (c) Top 30 genes from MEturquoise with connectivity lines (blue) associated with the top 5% of the connected genes.
Cells 11 02060 g006
Figure 7. Bemisia tabaci Mediterranean (MED) adults weighted gene co-expression network analysis. (a) Dendrogram clustering showing nine modules of co-expressed genes. A total of 784 genes are represented in this network, with 188 genes belonging to MEturquoise. (b) Heatmap showing the correlation of module eigengenes in relation to B. tabaci MED that acquired TYLCV (QT), SiGMV (QS), or CuLCrV (QC). (c) Top 30 genes from MEturquoise with connectivity lines (blue) associated with the top 5% of the connected genes.
Figure 7. Bemisia tabaci Mediterranean (MED) adults weighted gene co-expression network analysis. (a) Dendrogram clustering showing nine modules of co-expressed genes. A total of 784 genes are represented in this network, with 188 genes belonging to MEturquoise. (b) Heatmap showing the correlation of module eigengenes in relation to B. tabaci MED that acquired TYLCV (QT), SiGMV (QS), or CuLCrV (QC). (c) Top 30 genes from MEturquoise with connectivity lines (blue) associated with the top 5% of the connected genes.
Cells 11 02060 g007
Figure 8. KEGG pathways pertaining to signal transduction identified in viruliferous Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1. The number of differentially expressed genes involved in each pathway are displayed on the x-axis.
Figure 8. KEGG pathways pertaining to signal transduction identified in viruliferous Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1. The number of differentially expressed genes involved in each pathway are displayed on the x-axis.
Cells 11 02060 g008
Figure 9. KEGG pathways pertaining to signal transduction identified in viruliferous Bemisia tabaci Mediterranean. The number of differentially expressed genes involved in each pathway are displayed on the x-axis.
Figure 9. KEGG pathways pertaining to signal transduction identified in viruliferous Bemisia tabaci Mediterranean. The number of differentially expressed genes involved in each pathway are displayed on the x-axis.
Cells 11 02060 g009
Table 1. Summary of RNA sequencing datasets generated from Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults provided with a feeding access for 72 h on tomato yellow leaf curl virus-infected or non-infected tomato plants, sida golden mosaic virus-infected or non-infected prickly sida plants, and cucurbit leaf crumple virus-infected or non-infected squash plants.
Table 1. Summary of RNA sequencing datasets generated from Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 and MED adults provided with a feeding access for 72 h on tomato yellow leaf curl virus-infected or non-infected tomato plants, sida golden mosaic virus-infected or non-infected prickly sida plants, and cucurbit leaf crumple virus-infected or non-infected squash plants.
Whitefly (wf)Sample DescriptionNo. Raw Read PairsNo. Final Cleaned Read PairsMapped to B. tabaci MEAM1 Genome
No. Mapped% Mapped
MEAM1TYLCV viruliferous wf rep 127,270,10025,637,46724,019,25493.69
TYLCV viruliferous wf rep 233,377,64731,071,27729,119,19793.72
TYLCV viruliferous wf rep 324,223,84021,083,26819,512,99592.55
TYLCV viruliferous wf rep 422,603,10020,914,16619,565,24393.55
TYLCV viruliferous wf rep 527,080,14125,645,47123,601,48492.03
TYLCV non-viruliferous wf rep 123,986,05820,725,00719,011,84691.73
TYLCV non-viruliferous wf rep 222,543,74921,484,75120,078,44993.45
TYLCV non-viruliferous wf rep 326,130,54225,088,69023,641,10094.23
TYLCV non-viruliferous wf rep 419,634,83118,563,88516,658,49189.74
SiGMV viruliferous wf rep 124,481,17822,306,20220,999,22494.14
SiGMV viruliferous wf rep 225,457,65925,032,82523,802,14495.08
SiGMV viruliferous wf rep 329,098,95126,525,91724,902,26793.88
SiGMV non-viruliferous wf rep 124,332,53124,082,07422,848,88494.88
SiGMV non-viruliferous wf rep 225,933,03125,672,55324,281,33594.58
SiGMV non-viruliferous wf rep 322,759,94322,505,46721,186,25394.14
CuLCrV viruliferous wf rep 121,397,61019,723,90118,448,96793.54
CuLCrV viruliferous wf rep 222,301,93820,532,73419,168,73293.36
CuLCrV viruliferous wf rep 321,582,18519,996,86718,700,09193.52
CuLCrV viruliferous wf rep 421,650,34320,031,54518,739,72093.55
CuLCrV viruliferous wf rep 519,784,31118,353,65117,045,90992.87
CuLCrV non-viruliferous wf rep 123,300,25021,146,62319,768,75693.48
CuLCrV non-viruliferous wf rep 222,140,10120,294,41919,013,12993.69
CuLCrV non-viruliferous wf rep 322,523,40120,735,03419,428,62493.70
CuLCrV non-viruliferous wf rep 421,194,68819,576,27518,327,41193.62
CuLCrV non-viruliferous wf rep 522,698,99720,790,78319,433,50293.47
MEDTYLCV viruliferous wf rep 123,977,94721,535,88219,304,33689.64
TYLCV viruliferous wf rep 224,395,35721,999,67619,854,07490.25
TYLCV viruliferous wf rep 320,9762,1118,879,92117,061,78490.37
TYLCV viruliferous wf rep 426,209,32023,610,51321,313,23290.27
TYLCV non-viruliferous wf rep 120,685,80018,272,49116,550,56390.58
TYLCV non-viruliferous wf rep 222,763,95020,476,85118,633,95491.00
TYLCV non-viruliferous wf rep 323,892,86021,062,12819,086,84490.62
TYLCV non-viruliferous wf rep 422,570,01019,970,20118,086,76990.57
TYLCV non-viruliferous wf rep 520,134,31517,960,38616,234,63190.39
SiGMV viruliferous wf rep 122,732,64820,756,61918,734,81990.26
SiGMV viruliferous wf rep 219,747,88018,122,10316,407,87590.54
SiGMV viruliferous wf rep 322,988,95120,864,40818,730,92889.77
SiGMV viruliferous wf rep 422,521,27220,582,49918,583,82890.29
SiGMV viruliferous wf rep 529,236,81926,690,40424,037,68990.06
SiGMV non-viruliferous wf rep 126,310,23924,295,38521,962,42790.40
SiGMV non-viruliferous wf rep 223,960,07222,029,65619,493,19288.49
SiGMV non-viruliferous wf rep 324,484,54922,676,53620,522,49590.50
SiGMV non-viruliferous wf rep 422,282,78920,521,02318,454,69889.93
SiGMV non-viruliferous wf rep 529,952,15527,649,37025,014,40190.47
CuLCrV viruliferous wf rep 122,647,11619,812,02617,824,97989.97
CuLCrV viruliferous wf rep 222,271,95519,857,10517,933,94190.31
CuLCrV viruliferous wf rep 321,412,36717,573,54315,635,88788.97
CuLCrV viruliferous wf rep 421,739,52519,470,83317,583,08090.30
CuLCrV viruliferous wf rep 522,185,44418,994,18016,993,66589.47
CuLCrV non-viruliferous wf rep 121,346,94318,119,38216,207,54989.45
CuLCrV non-viruliferous wf rep 221,931,99618,517,71416,503,84289.12
CuLCrV non-viruliferous wf rep 328,625,27924,307,19121,703,55489.29
Note. After the 72 h feeding access period, the whiteflies were transferred to cotton plants for another 72 h for gut clearing.
Table 2. Differential expression of genes associated with virus infection in viruliferous Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) and Mediterranean (MED) adults compared with non-viruliferous adults.
Table 2. Differential expression of genes associated with virus infection in viruliferous Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) and Mediterranean (MED) adults compared with non-viruliferous adults.
Gene IDAnnotationFC in Whitefly & Virus Treatment
DEGs shared by MEAM1 and MED
Bta03437Zinc finger protein−2.69 for B-TYLCV, −1.38 for Q-SiGMV
Bta02903Heat shock protein 70−5.55 for B-CuLCrV, 1.83 for Q-CuLCrV
Bta0986770 kDa heat shock protein−4.54 for B-CuLCrV, −1.50 for Q- TYLCV, −2.63 for Q-SiGMV
DEGs specific to MEAM1
Bta00981Cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein 3-like protein 21.60 for SiGMV
Bta03000Heat shock protein 70−5.91 for CuLCrV
Bta03004Suppressor of hairless protein1.07 for TYLCV, 1.29 for SiGMV
Bta03628Zinc finger protein 569−1.30 for SiGMV
Bta04025Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit B subunit beta1.02 for SiGMV
Bta04026Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit B subunit beta−1.67 for TYLCV
Bta04167Ras-like GTP-binding protein RHO1.22 for SiGMV
Bta04484Guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit alpha-like protein1.53 for TYLCV
Bta04715Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 11.69 for TYLCV, 1.49 for SiGMV
Bta04818Type I serine/threonine kinase receptor1.47 for SiGMV
Bta06076Heat shock protein−1.39 for TYLCV
Bta06234Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(O) subunit alpha1.34 for SiGMV
Bta08159Transcription factor 7-like 1-A1.50 for SiGMV
Bta10215Ran-specific GTPase-activating protein1.29 for TYLCV
Bta10683AP-1 complex subunit sigma-21.56 for TYLCV, 1.59 for SiGMV
Bta11558Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 11.22 for TYLCV, 1.29 for SiGMV
Bta11785Zinc finger protein0.86 for CuLCrV
Bta12195Phosphoinositide phospholipase C1.15 for SiGMV
Bta13153Sensory neuron membrane protein 11.04 for SiGMV
Bta13437Actin−1.84 for TYLCV
Bta14253Protein kinase C1.54 for SiGMV
Bta1453270 kDa heat shock protein−2.20 for CuLCrV
Bta14568Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(S) subunit alpha1.12 for TYLCV
Bta14627Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog1.15 for SiGMV
Bta15240F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 1A1.19 for SiGMV
Bta15478Ras-like GTP-binding protein RHO1.45 for SiGMV
Bta15565Partitioning defective protein 61.37 for SiGMV
DEGs specific to MED
Bta0000870 kDa heat shock protein−2.02 for SiGMV
Bta00607SAM domain and HD domain-containing protein 10.71 for TYLCV
Bta01535Zinc finger protein 2081.28 for SIGMV
Bta01860Calreticulin0.72 for TYLCV
Bta02113Protein disulfide-isomerase0.76 for TYLCV
Bta06159Ribosomal protein L19−3.19 for TYLCV
Bta12772Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase−0.73 for TYLCV
Note. Genes with the same annotation name but different gene IDs are isoforms. B- and Q- represent the B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED.
Table 3. Differential expression of genes associated with signal transduction in viruliferous compared with non-viruliferous Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 and Mediterranean (MED) adults.
Table 3. Differential expression of genes associated with signal transduction in viruliferous compared with non-viruliferous Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 and Mediterranean (MED) adults.
Gene IDAnnotationFC in Whitefly & Virus Treatment
DEGs shared by MEAM1 and MED
Bta03437Zinc finger protein−2.69 for B-TYLCV, −1.38 for Q-SiGMV
Bta02903Heat shock protein 70−5.55 for B-CuLCrV, 1.83 for Q-CuLCrV
Bta07645Prickle, putative−1.71 for B- TYLCV, −1.26 for Q-TYLCV
Bta0986770 kDa heat shock protein−4.54 for B-CuLCrV, −1.50 for Q-TYLCV, −2.63 for Q-SiGMV
DEGs specific to MEAM1
Bta00915Homeobox protein 91.29 for SiGMV
Bta00981Cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein 3-like protein 21.60 for SiGMV
Bta03000Heat shock protein 70−5.91 for CuLCrV
Bta03004Suppressor of hairless protein1.07 for TYLCV, 1.29 for SiGMV
Bta031105-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2A−1.62 for TYLCV
Bta03159Ras-like protein 21.17 for SiGMV
Bta03261Homeobox protein prospero1.13 for SiGMV
Bta03841Casein kinase1.11 for SiGMV
Bta04025Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit B subunit beta1.02 for SiGMV
Bta04026Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit B subunit beta−1.67 for TYLCV
Bta04098Acyl-CoA Z9 desaturase−1.26 for SiGMV
Bta04167Ras-like GTP-binding protein RHO1.22 for SiGMV
Bta04210Protein kinase1.60 for SiGMV
Bta04351Transcriptional enhancer factor TEF-1−1.62 for TYLCV
Bta04481Calcium release-activated calcium channel protein 11.63 for SiGMV
Bta04484Guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit alpha-like protein1.53 for TYLCV
Bta04715Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 11.69 for TYLCV, 1.49 for SiGMV
Bta04818Type I serine/threonine kinase receptor1.47 for SiGMV
Bta05836Protein prickle−1.79 for TYLCV
Bta05989Inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 21.11 for SiGMV
Bta06076Heat shock protein−1.39 for TYLCV
Bta06089Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit delta1.51 for TYLCV
Bta06234Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(O) subunit alpha1.34 for SiGMV
Bta07544Alkaline phosphatase−1.86 for TYLCV
Bta07953Raw, isoform A1.24 for SiGMV
Bta07992Protein kinase C1.58 for SiGMV
Bta08159Transcription factor 7-like 1-A1.50 for SiGMV
Bta08259Inositol-trisphosphate 3-kinase B1.36 for SiGMV
Bta08332Arrestin 1c−1.89 for TYLCV
Bta08932Acyl-CoA desaturase 1−1.63 for TYLCV
Bta08933Acyl-CoA desaturase3.55 for SiGMV
Bta09047Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase [GTP]−1.25 for TYLCV, −1.21 for SiGMV
Bta09151Protein kinase−1.51 for TYLCV
Bta09834Sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit beta-2, putative1.01 for SiGMV
Bta10421E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase CBL, putative1.22 for SiGMV
Bta11558Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 11.22 for TYLCV, 1.29 for SiGMV
Bta12096Phosphatidate cytidylyltransferase1.08 for SiGMV
Bta12195Phosphoinositide phospholipase C1.15 for SiGMV
Bta13074Sodium/calcium exchanger 11.84 for SiGMV
Bta13437Actin−1.84 for TYLCV
Bta13534Ceramide synthase 61.28 for SiGMV
Bta14253Protein kinase C1.54 for SiGMV
Bta14395Alkaline phosphatase−1.53 for TYLCV, -0.98 for SiGMV
Bta14493E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase−2.14 for TYLCV
Bta1453270 kDa heat shock protein−2.20 for CuLCrV
Bta14568Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(S) subunit alpha1.12 for TYLCV
Bta14627Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog1.15 for SiGMV
Bta15240F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 1A1.19 for SiGMV
Bta15478Ras-like GTP-binding protein RHO1.45 for SiGMV
Bta15489Transporter1.08 for SiGMV
Bta15565Partitioning defective protein 61.37 for SiGMV
DEGs specific to MED
Bta0000870 kDa heat shock protein−2.02 for SiGMV
Bta01763Acyl-CoA Delta(11) desaturase0.95 for TYLCV
Bta02612Protein kinase C−0.82 for TYLCV
Bta04657Speckle-type POZ protein B−0.79 for TYLCV
Bta05672Acyl-CoA desaturase−1.62 for TYLCV
Bta09402Phospholipase A21.81 for TYLCV
Bta09287Chaperone protein HtpG0.73 for TYLCV
Bta12301Nucleoside diphosphate kinase0.83 for SiGMV
Bta12772Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase−0.73 for TYLCV
Bta14581Calcium-transporting ATPase−1.79 for CuLCrV
Bta14821Wnt inhibitory factor 1−1.24 for TYLCV
Note. Genes with the same annotation name but different gene IDs are isoforms. B- and Q- represent the B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED.
Table 4. Differential expression of genes associated with immune system categories in viruliferous compared with non-viruliferous Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) and Mediterranean (MED) adults.
Table 4. Differential expression of genes associated with immune system categories in viruliferous compared with non-viruliferous Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) and Mediterranean (MED) adults.
Gene IDAnnotationFC in Whitefly & Virus Treatment
DEGs shared by MEAM1 and MED
Bta02886Protein spaetzle1.13 for B-CuLCrV, −1.35 for Q-TYLCV
Bta02903Heat shock protein 70−5.55 for B-CuLCrV, 1.83 for Q-CuLCrV
Bta08035Cathepsin B−1.55 for B-TYLCV, −1.19 for Q-TYLCV
Bta09314Cathepsin B−2.17 for B-SiGMV, 0.89 for Q-TYLCV, 1.18 for Q-SiGMV
Bta09772Cathepsin B−1.11 for B-SiGMV, 1.02 for Q-TYLCV, −1.67 for Q-SiGMV
Bta0986770 kDa heat shock protein−4.54 for B-CuLCrV, −1.50 for Q-TYLCV, −2.63 for Q-SiGMV
Bta10364Cathepsin B1.46 for B-SiGMV, 3.67 for B-CuLCrV, −2.79 for Q-TYLCV
Bta10767Cathepsin B1.37 for B-CuLCrV, −1.35 for Q-TYLCV
Bta12604Cathepsin B−1.19 for B-SiGMV, −1.09 for Q-TYLCV
Bta14750Cathepsin B2.84 for B-CuLCrV −2.25 for Q-TYLCV
DEGs specific to MEAM1
Bta01559Aminopeptidase N, putative−1.70 for TYLCV
Bta03000Heat shock protein 70−5.91 for CuLCrV
Bta03004Suppressor of hairless protein1.07 for TYLCV, 1.29 for SiGMV
Bta03159Ras-like protein 21.17 for SiGMV
Bta04167Ras-like GTP-binding protein RHO1.22 for SiGMV
Bta04210Protein kinase1.60 for SiGMV
Bta04481Calcium release-activated calcium channel protein 11.63 for SiGMV
Bta04640Actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 21.38 for SiGMV
Bta04715Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 11.69 for TYLCV, 1.49 for SiGMV
Bta04792Aminopeptidase N-like protein1.40 for TYLCV
Bta04818Type I serine/threonine kinase receptor1.47 for SiGMV
Bta06076Heat shock protein−1.39 for TYLCV
Bta07992Protein kinase C1.58 for SiGMV
Bta08332Arrestin 1c−1.89 for TYLCV
Bta08697Cathepsin B−1.17 for TYLCV
Bta09313Cathepsin B−2.34 for SiGMV
Bta09601Unknown protein−1.51 for TYLCV
Bta10766Cathepsin B1.02 for CuLCrV
Bta11052Gelsolin−1.19 for TYLCV
Bta11333Peptidoglycan-recognition protein−1.74 for TYLCV
Bta11558Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 11.22 for TYLCV, 1.29 for SiGMV
Bta12195Phosphoinositide phospholipase C1.15 for SiGMV
Bta12605Cathepsin B1.31 for CuLCrV
Bta12986Cathepsin B−2.24 for TYLCV
Bta13437Actin−1.84 for TYLCV
Bta14253Protein kinase C1.54 for SiGMV
Bta1453270 kDa heat shock protein−2.20 for CuLCrV
Bta14568Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(S) subunit alpha1.12 for TYLCV
Bta14627Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog1.15 for SiGMV
Bta14721Cathepsin B0.85 for CuLCrV
Bta14751Cathepsin B, partial1.32 for CuLCrV
Bta15240F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 1A1.19 for SiGMV
Bta15478Ras-like GTP-binding protein RHO1.45 for SiGMV
DEGs specific to MED
Bta0000870 kDa heat shock protein−2.02 for SiGMV
Bta01860Calreticulin0.72 for TYLCV
Bta02113Protein disulfide-isomerase0.74 for TYLCV
Bta02546Aminopeptidase-like protein−0.72 for TYLCV
Bta02612Protein kinase C−0.82 for TYLCV
Bta03883Cathepsin B−1.42 for TYLCV
Bta03885Cathepsin B−1.36 for TYLCV
Bta04776Cathepsin B−1.26 for TYLCV
Bta06903Cathepsin L0.74 for TYLCV
Bta08022CG13675, isoform D−1.02 for SiGMV
Bta08951Cathepsin B−0.89 for TYLCV
Bta09287Chaperone protein HtpG0.73 for TYLCV
Bta09613Cathepsin L, partial2.92 for SiGMV
Bta10363Cathepsin B−0.93 for TYLCV
Bta11419Cathepsin B−1.34 for TYLCV
Bta11420Cathepsin B−1.45 for TYLCV
Bta11544Heat shock 70 kDa protein 50.71 for TYLCV
Bta12285Cathepsin B−2.20 for TYLCV, −1.66 for SiGMV
Bta12772Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase−0.73 for TYLCV
Bta14718Cathepsin B−0.79 for TYLCV
Note. Genes with the same annotation name but different gene IDs are isoforms. B- and Q- represent the B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED.
Table 5. Differential expression of genes associated with cellular processes (apoptosis, lysosome, and phagosome) in viruliferous compared with non-viruliferous Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) and Mediterranean (MED) adults.
Table 5. Differential expression of genes associated with cellular processes (apoptosis, lysosome, and phagosome) in viruliferous compared with non-viruliferous Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) and Mediterranean (MED) adults.
Gene IDAnnotationFC in Whitefly & Virus Treatment
DEGs specific to MEAM1
Bta01964Acid phosphatase-like protein1.62 for TYLCV
Bta02098Transport protein Sec61 subunit gamma2.28 for SiGMV
Bta02143Cathepsin F-like protease−1.77 for TYLCV, −1.09 for SiGMV
Bta03900Tubulin alpha-3 chain−1.72 for TYLCV, −1.17 for SiGMV
Bta04715Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 11.69 for TYLCV, 1.49 for SiGMV
Bta04774Arylsulfatase−1.44 for TYLCV
Bta04870Cathepsin F−1.89 for TYLCV
Bta05911Cathepsin F-like protease3.37 for CuLCrV
Bta05912Cathepsin F-like protease−2.06 for SiGMV
Bta06085Protein kinase−2.28 for TYLCV
Bta06086Protein kinase C−1.85 for TYLCV
Bta06403Vesicular glutamate transporter 1−1.44 for TYLCV
Bta06690Cathepsin F1.15 for CuLCrV
Bta06693Cathepsin F−1.05 for SiGMV
Bta06964DNAation factor subunit beta1.36 for SiGMV
Bta07988Syntaxin-181.35 for SiGMV
Bta07992Protein kinase C1.58 for SiGMV
Bta08697Cathepsin B−1.17 for TYLCV
Bta09313Cathepsin B−2.34 for SiGMV
Bta09676Cathepsin F0.94 for CuLCrV
Bta10683AP-1 complex subunit sigma-21.56 for TYLCV, 1.59 for SiGMV
Bta10766Cathepsin B1.02 for CuLCrV
Bta11284Tetraspanin−1.12 for TYLCV
Bta11558Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 11.22 for TYLCV, 1.29 for SiGMV
Bta11871Cathepsin F−1.15 for TYLCV
Bta12131Beta-hexosaminidase−1.61 for TYLCV
Bta12605Cathepsin B1.31 for CuLCrV
Bta12986Cathepsin B−2.24 for TYLCV
Bta13153Sensory neuron membrane protein 11.04 for SiGMV
Bta13437Actin−1.84 for TYLCV
Bta14721Cathepsin B0.85 for CuLCrV
Bta14751Cathepsin B, partial1.32 for CuLCrV
Bta14774Beta-hexosaminidase−2.13 for TYLCV
Bta20004Cathepsin F0.77 for CuLCrV
DEGs specific to MED
Bta01413Lipase1.19 for TYLCV
Bta01860Calreticulin0.72 for TYLCV
Bta03221Alpha-mannosidase−0.72 for TYLCV
Bta03883Cathepsin B−1.42 for TYLCV
Bta03885Cathepsin B−1.36 for TYLCV
Bta04776Cathepsin B−1.26 for TYLCV
Bta06903Cathepsin L0.74 for TYLCV
Bta07114Cathepsin F−0.87 for TYLCV
Bta07355N(4)-(Beta-N-acetylglucosaminyl)-L-asparaginase1.06 for CuLCrV
Bta08951Cathepsin B−0.89 for TYLCV
Bta09613Cathepsin L, partial2.92 for SiGMV
Bta10363Cathepsin B−0.93 for TYLCV
Bta10727Protein transport protein Sec61 subunit alpha isoform 20.92 for TYLCV
Bta10829Acid phosphatase-1−1.71 for TYLCV, 1.78 for SiGMV
Bta11205Cathepsin F-like protease−1.21 for CuLCrV
Bta11419Cathepsin B−1.34 for TYLCV
Bta11420Cathepsin B−1.45 for TYLCV
Bta12285Cathepsin B−2.20 for TYLCV, −1.66 for SiGMV
Bta14718Cathepsin B−0.79 for TYLCV
Note. Genes with the same annotation name but different gene IDs are isoforms. B- and Q- represent the B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED.
Table 6. Differential expression of genes associated with longevity in viruliferous compared with non-viruliferous Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) and Mediterranean (MED) adults.
Table 6. Differential expression of genes associated with longevity in viruliferous compared with non-viruliferous Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) and Mediterranean (MED) adults.
Gene IDAnnotationFC in Whitefly & Virus Treatment
DEGs specific to MEAM1
Bta00981Cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein 3-like protein 21.60 for SiGMV
Bta01299Forkhead box A−2.21 for TYLCV
Bta03000Heat shock protein 70−5.91 for CuLCrV
Bta03177Glutathione S-transferase−1.31 for SiGMV
Bta04098Acyl-CoA Z9 desaturase−1.26 for SiGMV
Bta06076Heat shock protein−1.39 for TYLCV
Bta06196Sestrin-like protein1.19 for TYLCV, 1.30 for SiGMV
Bta08630Fatty acyl-CoA reductase 11.30 for CuLCrV
Bta08932Acyl-CoA desaturase 1−1.63 for TYLCV
Bta08933Acyl-CoA desaturase3.55 for SiGMV
Bta09151Protein kinase−1.51 for TYLCV
Bta13853Heat shock factor-binding protein, putative2.42 for SiGMV
Bta14222Fatty acyl-CoA reductase 1−1.02 for TYLCV
Bta1453270 kDa heat shock protein−2.20 for CuLCrV
Bta15447Glutathione s-transferase d1−0.87 for SiGMV
DEGs specific to MED
Bta0000870 kDa heat shock protein−2.02 for SiGMV
Bta01763Acyl-CoA Delta (11) desaturase0.95 for TYLCV
Bta05672Acyl-CoA desaturase−1.62 for TYLCV
Bta11628Fatty acyl-CoA reductase 1−1.58 for CuLCrV
Bta13675Fatty acyl-CoA reductase 11.00 for TYLCV
Note. Genes with the same annotation name but different gene IDs are isoforms. B- and Q- represent the B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mugerwa, H.; Gautam, S.; Catto, M.A.; Dutta, B.; Brown, J.K.; Adkins, S.; Srinivasan, R. Differential Transcriptional Responses in Two Old World Bemisia tabaci Cryptic Species Post Acquisition of Old and New World Begomoviruses. Cells 2022, 11, 2060. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11132060

AMA Style

Mugerwa H, Gautam S, Catto MA, Dutta B, Brown JK, Adkins S, Srinivasan R. Differential Transcriptional Responses in Two Old World Bemisia tabaci Cryptic Species Post Acquisition of Old and New World Begomoviruses. Cells. 2022; 11(13):2060. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11132060

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mugerwa, Habibu, Saurabh Gautam, Michael A. Catto, Bhabesh Dutta, Judith K. Brown, Scott Adkins, and Rajagopalbabu Srinivasan. 2022. "Differential Transcriptional Responses in Two Old World Bemisia tabaci Cryptic Species Post Acquisition of Old and New World Begomoviruses" Cells 11, no. 13: 2060. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11132060

APA Style

Mugerwa, H., Gautam, S., Catto, M. A., Dutta, B., Brown, J. K., Adkins, S., & Srinivasan, R. (2022). Differential Transcriptional Responses in Two Old World Bemisia tabaci Cryptic Species Post Acquisition of Old and New World Begomoviruses. Cells, 11(13), 2060. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11132060

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop