Next Article in Journal
Regulatory Functions and Mechanisms of Circular RNAs in Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation and Liver Fibrosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Primary Human Liver Cancer Cells by Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Raman Spectroscopy
Previous Article in Journal
Profiling of G-Protein Coupled Receptors in Adipose Tissue and Differentiating Adipocytes Offers a Translational Resource for Obesity/Metabolic Research
Previous Article in Special Issue
Computational Portable Microscopes for Point-of-Care-Test and Tele-Diagnosis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Rapid Identification of Infectious Pathogens at the Single-Cell Level via Combining Hyperspectral Microscopic Images and Deep Learning

by Chenglong Tao 1,2,3, Jian Du 1,3, Junjie Wang 1,2,3, Bingliang Hu 1,3,* and Zhoufeng Zhang 1,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 20 November 2022 / Revised: 17 December 2022 / Accepted: 6 January 2023 / Published: 19 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Computational Imaging for Biophotonics and Biomedicine)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this manuscript, Tao et al developed an analytical workflow for identifying the bacterial species based on their hyperspectral images. They used deep learning frameworks to leverage the spectral and morphological information from the bacteria to achieve that. The paper is clearly written, and the results are sound. I would like to ask the authors to address the following issues regarding the practical use of this method in the clinical setting. 

1. A clinical sample usually contains multiple pathogen species of bacteria that live in an environment quite different from the lab culture conditions. How transformable are the training data in real-life samples? Have the authors tried to identify bacteria from such samples?

2. The spectral and morphological profiles should depend on the imaging condition, such as the focal plane, the thickness of the coverglass, and the spectral/intensity profile of the lamp, etc. The authors should discuss how these difference may affect the accuracy of their model. Especially, to obtain high accuracy, is it necessary to train the model every time for an imaging session? If so, the cost could be high.

Minor issues:

1. Abstract: What does "tremulous" mean here?

2. The introduction should include discussion of PCR-based genomic approaches.

3. Equation 3: MDb should be SCb?

4. Figure 3: "transmissance" should be "transmittance".

5. The authors should consider making their codes open source to facilitate the application of their method.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

See the attached MS Word file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The revised version of the manuscript reads much better. I must confess I am still not entirely convinced that classifying spectra of single bacteria is a smart long-term strategy for the development of diagnostic systems. However, my disagreement with the authors should not prevent them from publishing their results. It is indeed intriguing that single organisms exhibit distinguishable spectral profiles. Therefore, the authors' report may contribute to the creation of new techniques that take advantage of these spectral properties. Even if the result does not necessarily lead to improvement in diagnostics (as the authors envisioned), it may inspire other label-free biodetection work.

Back to TopTop