Figure 1.
Tumor kinetics in our novel orthotopic chronic HS diet murine tumor model. (A) To maintain the tumor cells in a chronic HS tumor microenvironment, the tumor cells were sequentially passaged four times. In passage 1, the syngeneic breast cancer cells (Py230 or 4T1) were injected into mice breast pads (C57Bl/6J or BALB/cJ, respectively). For the HS diet cohort, the mice were kept on an HS diet 2 weeks prior to the injection of tumor cells. At the time of the diet switch, the HS diet cohort mice were pair-fed with the RS diet cohort mice. The tumors were allowed to grow for 28 days following injection, at which point, the mice were sacrificed and tumors were explanted. The harvested tumors were digested with collagenase and tumor cells were isolated. The tumor cells isolated from the RS diet cohort were rested and cultured in regular complete RPMI1640 media, while those isolated from the HS diet cohort were cultured in complete media supplemented with salt (Δ50 mM NaCl) for 5 days. The supernatant media containing floating non-tumor and dead cells were aspirated 24 h after isolation, at which time fresh medium (noted above) was added to incubate the cells at 37 °C for another 4 days. The adherent cells were then trypsinized and isolated for injection into passage 2 mice. This process was repeated until passage 4 mice. (B–I) Tumor volume changes following four murine passages in RS (■1% NaCl) and HS (■4% NaCl) dietary conditions. Tumor volume kinetics followed for 28 days in two murine breast tumor models: (B–E) C57Bl/6J mice injected with orthotopic Py230 breast tumor cells, and (F–I) BALB/cJ mice injected with orthotopic 4T1 breast tumor cells. Data presented as mean ± SEM; n = 8; statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA multiple comparisons and Dunnet’s post-test (*) p-value < 0.05.
Figure 1.
Tumor kinetics in our novel orthotopic chronic HS diet murine tumor model. (A) To maintain the tumor cells in a chronic HS tumor microenvironment, the tumor cells were sequentially passaged four times. In passage 1, the syngeneic breast cancer cells (Py230 or 4T1) were injected into mice breast pads (C57Bl/6J or BALB/cJ, respectively). For the HS diet cohort, the mice were kept on an HS diet 2 weeks prior to the injection of tumor cells. At the time of the diet switch, the HS diet cohort mice were pair-fed with the RS diet cohort mice. The tumors were allowed to grow for 28 days following injection, at which point, the mice were sacrificed and tumors were explanted. The harvested tumors were digested with collagenase and tumor cells were isolated. The tumor cells isolated from the RS diet cohort were rested and cultured in regular complete RPMI1640 media, while those isolated from the HS diet cohort were cultured in complete media supplemented with salt (Δ50 mM NaCl) for 5 days. The supernatant media containing floating non-tumor and dead cells were aspirated 24 h after isolation, at which time fresh medium (noted above) was added to incubate the cells at 37 °C for another 4 days. The adherent cells were then trypsinized and isolated for injection into passage 2 mice. This process was repeated until passage 4 mice. (B–I) Tumor volume changes following four murine passages in RS (■1% NaCl) and HS (■4% NaCl) dietary conditions. Tumor volume kinetics followed for 28 days in two murine breast tumor models: (B–E) C57Bl/6J mice injected with orthotopic Py230 breast tumor cells, and (F–I) BALB/cJ mice injected with orthotopic 4T1 breast tumor cells. Data presented as mean ± SEM; n = 8; statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA multiple comparisons and Dunnet’s post-test (*) p-value < 0.05.
Figure 2.
Enumeration of TISC frequency in various murine passages following dietary salt modification. The frequency of CD44+CD24−TISCs cells in the isolated tumor cells among RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohorts was enumerated by flow cytometry. (A,B) Representative flow cytometry plot of TISCs from passage 1 and passage 4 of Py230-C57Bl/6J HS diet cohort. (C,D) Changes in TISC frequency with each passage in Py230-C57Bl/6J (C) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (D) murine tumor models. (E–N) The mRNA expression of TISC markers Cadherin 1 (E,J), Snail2 (F,K), Aldh1A1 (G,L), Sox2 (H,M), and ITGA6 (I,N) in four passages of Py230-C57Bl/6J and 4T1-BALB/cJ tumor models (respectively). Data analyzed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons and presented as mean ± SEM; n = 8 (biological replicates) per cohort; (*) p-value < 0.05.
Figure 2.
Enumeration of TISC frequency in various murine passages following dietary salt modification. The frequency of CD44+CD24−TISCs cells in the isolated tumor cells among RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohorts was enumerated by flow cytometry. (A,B) Representative flow cytometry plot of TISCs from passage 1 and passage 4 of Py230-C57Bl/6J HS diet cohort. (C,D) Changes in TISC frequency with each passage in Py230-C57Bl/6J (C) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (D) murine tumor models. (E–N) The mRNA expression of TISC markers Cadherin 1 (E,J), Snail2 (F,K), Aldh1A1 (G,L), Sox2 (H,M), and ITGA6 (I,N) in four passages of Py230-C57Bl/6J and 4T1-BALB/cJ tumor models (respectively). Data analyzed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons and presented as mean ± SEM; n = 8 (biological replicates) per cohort; (*) p-value < 0.05.
Figure 3.
Anti-tumor efficiency of tumor-infiltrating CD8+T cells. (A,B) CD8+T cells were isolated by negative selection using magnetic immunobeads. The FSC/SSC plot shows that the isolation yielded >95% purity, which was further confirmed by staining with CD8-PE; isotype control shown in grey and CD8+T cells shown in red. (C,D) Cytotoxic efficiency of CD8+T cells on the passage-matched syngeneic cancer cells (E:T ratio 20:1) isolated from the explanted tumors from RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohorts was assessed by LDH release assay in Py230-C57Bl/6J (C) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (D) murine tumor models. (E) Representative flow cytometry-based analysis of cytotoxicity with labeling of PKH26 labeled cancer cells. The dead cell events were measured by 7-AAD/PKH26 double-positive events. (F,G) Cytotoxic efficiency of CD8+T cells on the passage-matched syngeneic cancer cells (E:T ratio 20:1) isolated from the explanted tumors from RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohorts as assessed by PKH26+7-AAD+ events in Py230-C57Bl/6J (F) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (G) murine tumor models. (H–S) The mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines: granzyme B (H,N) and IFNγ (I,O); exhaustion/inhibitory markers: LAG3 (J,P), CTLA4 (K,Q), PD1 (L,R), and TIM3 (M,S) in the tumor-infiltrating CD8+T cells from each of the four passages in RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohort of Py230-C57Bl/6J and 4T1-BALB/cJ tumor models (respectively). Data analyzed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons and presented as mean ± SEM; n = 8 (biological replicates) per cohort; (*) p-value < 0.05.
Figure 3.
Anti-tumor efficiency of tumor-infiltrating CD8+T cells. (A,B) CD8+T cells were isolated by negative selection using magnetic immunobeads. The FSC/SSC plot shows that the isolation yielded >95% purity, which was further confirmed by staining with CD8-PE; isotype control shown in grey and CD8+T cells shown in red. (C,D) Cytotoxic efficiency of CD8+T cells on the passage-matched syngeneic cancer cells (E:T ratio 20:1) isolated from the explanted tumors from RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohorts was assessed by LDH release assay in Py230-C57Bl/6J (C) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (D) murine tumor models. (E) Representative flow cytometry-based analysis of cytotoxicity with labeling of PKH26 labeled cancer cells. The dead cell events were measured by 7-AAD/PKH26 double-positive events. (F,G) Cytotoxic efficiency of CD8+T cells on the passage-matched syngeneic cancer cells (E:T ratio 20:1) isolated from the explanted tumors from RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohorts as assessed by PKH26+7-AAD+ events in Py230-C57Bl/6J (F) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (G) murine tumor models. (H–S) The mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines: granzyme B (H,N) and IFNγ (I,O); exhaustion/inhibitory markers: LAG3 (J,P), CTLA4 (K,Q), PD1 (L,R), and TIM3 (M,S) in the tumor-infiltrating CD8+T cells from each of the four passages in RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohort of Py230-C57Bl/6J and 4T1-BALB/cJ tumor models (respectively). Data analyzed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons and presented as mean ± SEM; n = 8 (biological replicates) per cohort; (*) p-value < 0.05.
Figure 4.
Anti-tumor efficiency of tumor-infiltrating CD4+T cells. (A,B) CD4+T cells were isolated by negative selection using magnetic immunobeads. The FSC/SSC plot shows that the isolation yielded >95% purity, which was further confirmed by staining with CD4-FTIC; isotype control shown in grey and CD4+T cells shown in green. (C,D) Cytotoxic efficiency of CD4+T cells on the passage-matched syngeneic cancer cells (E:T ratio 20:1) isolated from the explanted tumors from RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohorts as assessed by LDH release assay in Py230-C57Bl/6J (C) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (D) murine tumor models. (E) Representative flow cytometry-based analysis of cytotoxicity with labeling of PKH26 labeled cancer cells. The dead cell events were measured by 7-AAD/PKH26 double-positive events. (F,G) Cytotoxic efficiency of CD4+T cells on the passage-matched syngeneic cancer cells (E:T ratio 20:1) isolated from the explanted tumors from RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohorts as assessed by PKH26+7-AAD+ events in Py230-C57Bl/6J (F) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (G) murine tumor models. (H–S) The mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines: granzyme B (H,N) and IFNγ (I,O); exhaustion/inhibitory markers: LAG3 (J,P), CTLA4 (K,Q), PD1 (L,R), and TIM3 (M,S) in the tumor-infiltrating CD4+T cells from each of the four passages in RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohorts of Py230-C57Bl/6J and 4T1-BALB/cJ tumor models (respectively). Data analyzed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons and presented as mean ± SEM; n = 8 (biological replicates) per cohort; (*) p-value < 0.05.
Figure 4.
Anti-tumor efficiency of tumor-infiltrating CD4+T cells. (A,B) CD4+T cells were isolated by negative selection using magnetic immunobeads. The FSC/SSC plot shows that the isolation yielded >95% purity, which was further confirmed by staining with CD4-FTIC; isotype control shown in grey and CD4+T cells shown in green. (C,D) Cytotoxic efficiency of CD4+T cells on the passage-matched syngeneic cancer cells (E:T ratio 20:1) isolated from the explanted tumors from RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohorts as assessed by LDH release assay in Py230-C57Bl/6J (C) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (D) murine tumor models. (E) Representative flow cytometry-based analysis of cytotoxicity with labeling of PKH26 labeled cancer cells. The dead cell events were measured by 7-AAD/PKH26 double-positive events. (F,G) Cytotoxic efficiency of CD4+T cells on the passage-matched syngeneic cancer cells (E:T ratio 20:1) isolated from the explanted tumors from RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohorts as assessed by PKH26+7-AAD+ events in Py230-C57Bl/6J (F) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (G) murine tumor models. (H–S) The mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines: granzyme B (H,N) and IFNγ (I,O); exhaustion/inhibitory markers: LAG3 (J,P), CTLA4 (K,Q), PD1 (L,R), and TIM3 (M,S) in the tumor-infiltrating CD4+T cells from each of the four passages in RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohorts of Py230-C57Bl/6J and 4T1-BALB/cJ tumor models (respectively). Data analyzed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons and presented as mean ± SEM; n = 8 (biological replicates) per cohort; (*) p-value < 0.05.
Figure 5.
TGFβ signaling induced the expression of immune-inhibitory CD80 on TISCs. (A) Representative flow cytometry histogram of TGFβR2 expression in passages 1 (blue), 2 (pink), 3 (olive green), and 4 (purple) from the HS diet cohort of the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (B) Comparison of the relative expression of TGFβR2 in each of the four passages on CD4+CD24-TISCs isolated from RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohorts of the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (C) Representative flow cytometry histogram of pSMAD2/3 intracellular expression in each of the four passages from the HS diet cohort of the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (D) Comparison of the relative expression of pSMAD2/3 in each of the four passages on CD4+CD24-TISCs isolated from the RS and HS diet cohorts of the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (E) Representative flow cytometry histogram of CD80 surface expression in each of the four passages from the HS diet cohort of the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (F) Comparison of the relative expression of CD80 in each of the four passages on CD4+CD24-TISCs isolated from the RS and HS diet cohorts of the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (G) Representative flow cytometry plot to determine the TGFβR2/CD80 double-positive TISCs in passage 4 of the HS diet cohort from the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (H) Comparison of the relative expression of TGFβR2/CD80 double-positive TISCs in each of the four passages on CD4+CD24-TISCs isolated from the RS and HS diet cohorts of the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (I) Comparison of the relative expression of CD80 following TGFβ (80 ng/mL) stimulation for 5 days on CD4+CD24-TISCs isolated from each of the four passages of the RS and HS diet cohorts in the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (J–M) Comparison of the relative expression of TGFβR2 (J), pSMAd2/3 (K), CD80 (L), and TGFβR2/CD80 double-positive cells (M) in each of the four passages on CD4+CD24-TISCs isolated from the RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohorts of the 4T1-BALB/cJ tumor model. (N) Comparison of the relative expression of CD80 following TGFβ (80 ng/mL) treatment for 5 days on CD4+CD24-TISCs isolated from each of the four passages of the RS and HS diet cohorts of the 4T1-BALB/cJ tumor model. Data analyzed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons and presented as mean ± SEM; n = 8 (biological replicates) per cohort; (*) p-value < 0.05.
Figure 5.
TGFβ signaling induced the expression of immune-inhibitory CD80 on TISCs. (A) Representative flow cytometry histogram of TGFβR2 expression in passages 1 (blue), 2 (pink), 3 (olive green), and 4 (purple) from the HS diet cohort of the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (B) Comparison of the relative expression of TGFβR2 in each of the four passages on CD4+CD24-TISCs isolated from RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohorts of the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (C) Representative flow cytometry histogram of pSMAD2/3 intracellular expression in each of the four passages from the HS diet cohort of the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (D) Comparison of the relative expression of pSMAD2/3 in each of the four passages on CD4+CD24-TISCs isolated from the RS and HS diet cohorts of the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (E) Representative flow cytometry histogram of CD80 surface expression in each of the four passages from the HS diet cohort of the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (F) Comparison of the relative expression of CD80 in each of the four passages on CD4+CD24-TISCs isolated from the RS and HS diet cohorts of the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (G) Representative flow cytometry plot to determine the TGFβR2/CD80 double-positive TISCs in passage 4 of the HS diet cohort from the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (H) Comparison of the relative expression of TGFβR2/CD80 double-positive TISCs in each of the four passages on CD4+CD24-TISCs isolated from the RS and HS diet cohorts of the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (I) Comparison of the relative expression of CD80 following TGFβ (80 ng/mL) stimulation for 5 days on CD4+CD24-TISCs isolated from each of the four passages of the RS and HS diet cohorts in the Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (J–M) Comparison of the relative expression of TGFβR2 (J), pSMAd2/3 (K), CD80 (L), and TGFβR2/CD80 double-positive cells (M) in each of the four passages on CD4+CD24-TISCs isolated from the RS (grey) and HS (red) diet cohorts of the 4T1-BALB/cJ tumor model. (N) Comparison of the relative expression of CD80 following TGFβ (80 ng/mL) treatment for 5 days on CD4+CD24-TISCs isolated from each of the four passages of the RS and HS diet cohorts of the 4T1-BALB/cJ tumor model. Data analyzed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons and presented as mean ± SEM; n = 8 (biological replicates) per cohort; (*) p-value < 0.05.
Figure 6.
Combinatorial treatment of anti-TGFβ with anti-CTLA4 mAb resulted in enhanced anti-tumor impact. (A,F) Tumor volume changes in passage 4 of the chronic HS diet cohort kept on treatment with isotype mAb (red), anti-TGFβ mAb (olive green), anti-CTLA4 mAb (purple), and anti-CTLA4 mAb+anti-TGFβ mAb (blue) in the Py230-C57Bl/6J (A) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (F) tumor models. The tumor growth was analyzed with a mixed-effects model on the natural log scale to better meet normality assumptions. Data presented as mean ± SE of tumor volume over time; n = 8 per treatment group. The p-values for multiple comparisons were adjusted using the Holm–Bonferroni method; (*) p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01, and (***) p < 0.001. (B,G) Cytotoxicity of tumor-infiltrating CD8+T cells isolated on day-28 tumors from the four treatment cohorts (mentioned above) against the tumor cells (at E:T ratio 20:1) isolated from passage 4 of the HS diet cohort without treatment as assessed by LDH release assay in Py230-C57Bl/6J (B) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (G) tumor models. (C,H) Cytotoxicity of tumor-infiltrating CD4+T cells isolated on day 28 from the four treatment cohorts against the tumor cells (at E:T ratio 20:1) isolated from passage 4 of the HS diet cohort without treatment as assessed by LDH release assay in Py230-C57Bl/6J (C) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (H) tumor models. (D,I) The mRNA expression of granzyme B in CD8+T cells isolated on day 28 from the four treatment cohorts in passage 4 of the HS diet cohort of Py230-C57Bl/6J (D) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (I) tumor models. (E,J) The mRNA expression of granzyme B in CD4+T cells isolated on day 28 from the four treatment cohorts in passage 4 of the HS diet cohort of Py230-C57Bl/6J (E) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (J) tumor models. Data analyzed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons and presented as mean ± SEM; n = 8 (biological replicates) per cohort; (*) p-value < 0.05.
Figure 6.
Combinatorial treatment of anti-TGFβ with anti-CTLA4 mAb resulted in enhanced anti-tumor impact. (A,F) Tumor volume changes in passage 4 of the chronic HS diet cohort kept on treatment with isotype mAb (red), anti-TGFβ mAb (olive green), anti-CTLA4 mAb (purple), and anti-CTLA4 mAb+anti-TGFβ mAb (blue) in the Py230-C57Bl/6J (A) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (F) tumor models. The tumor growth was analyzed with a mixed-effects model on the natural log scale to better meet normality assumptions. Data presented as mean ± SE of tumor volume over time; n = 8 per treatment group. The p-values for multiple comparisons were adjusted using the Holm–Bonferroni method; (*) p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01, and (***) p < 0.001. (B,G) Cytotoxicity of tumor-infiltrating CD8+T cells isolated on day-28 tumors from the four treatment cohorts (mentioned above) against the tumor cells (at E:T ratio 20:1) isolated from passage 4 of the HS diet cohort without treatment as assessed by LDH release assay in Py230-C57Bl/6J (B) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (G) tumor models. (C,H) Cytotoxicity of tumor-infiltrating CD4+T cells isolated on day 28 from the four treatment cohorts against the tumor cells (at E:T ratio 20:1) isolated from passage 4 of the HS diet cohort without treatment as assessed by LDH release assay in Py230-C57Bl/6J (C) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (H) tumor models. (D,I) The mRNA expression of granzyme B in CD8+T cells isolated on day 28 from the four treatment cohorts in passage 4 of the HS diet cohort of Py230-C57Bl/6J (D) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (I) tumor models. (E,J) The mRNA expression of granzyme B in CD4+T cells isolated on day 28 from the four treatment cohorts in passage 4 of the HS diet cohort of Py230-C57Bl/6J (E) and 4T1-BALB/cJ (J) tumor models. Data analyzed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons and presented as mean ± SEM; n = 8 (biological replicates) per cohort; (*) p-value < 0.05.
Figure 7.
Chronic HS diet induced a metabolic phenotype switch in TISCs. The TISCs obtained from explanted tumors in each of the four passages in RS and HS dietary cohorts were cultured in base DMEM media without glucose and glutamine. pH-sensitive measurement of extracellular acidification rate (ECAR, A–C) was assessed by time-course changes in lactate production following addition of 100 mM glucose (gluc), mitochondrial inhibitor oligomycin (oligo, 2.5 μM), and glycolysis inhibitor 2-deoxy glucose (2DG, 500 mM). (A) Passage 1 TISCs from RS cohort (Py230-C57Bl/6J) demonstrated increased glycolytic activity following treatment with mitochondrial inhibitor (oligo) compared to HS diet counterparts, suggesting that TISCs from HS diet cohort were already at saturation capacity of glycolysis which could not be further enhanced by oligo treatment. (B) Passage 4 TISCs from RS cohort also demonstrated increased glycolytic activity following treatment with mitochondrial inhibitor (oligo) compared to HS diet counterparts, suggesting that TISCs from HS diet cohort were already at saturation capacity of glycolysis which could not be further enhanced by oligo treatment. (C) Comparisons in the glycolytic reserve capacity among TISCs from each of the four passages demonstrated that RS diet cohort had higher glycolytic reserve compared to HS diet cohort, suggesting that glycolysis is the major metabolic pathway in TISCs under HS dietary conditions. For measuring oxygen consumption rate (OCR, D–F) to determine the mitochondrial metabolism, the TISCs were cultured in base DMEM media with 100 mM glucose for basal OCR response, followed by time-course response changes with addition of mitochondrial inhibitors (oligo, 2.5 μM), proton gradient disruptor (carbonyl cyanide-4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone, FCCP, 500 nM) and rotenone/antimycin A (Rot/AntiA, 50/100 nM). (D) Passage 1 TISCs from RS cohort (Py230-C57Bl/6J) demonstrated increased basal OCR over HS cohort counterparts, suggesting that TISCs from RS cohort have oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) metabolic phenotype. Following treatment with metabolic inhibitors (oligo, FCCP, Rot/AntiA), TISCs from both cohorts demonstrated a similar change in OCR pattern. (E) Passage 4 TISCs from RS cohort (Py230-C57Bl/6J) demonstrated increased basal OCR over HS cohort counterpart, suggesting that TISCs from RS cohort have oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) metabolic phenotype. (F) Comparison of apparent respiratory reserve capacity among both cohorts demonstrated that TISCs from HS diet cohort in all four passages have higher OXPHOS reserve over their RS counterparts, suggesting that while OXPHOS is the major metabolic phenotype in RS cohort, glycolysis is the major metabolic phenotype in HS cohort. (G,H) ECAR studies following stimulation with TGFβ demonstrated that HS diet cohort maintained glycolytic phenotype. Although we noticed a slight decrease in glycolytic reserve capacity in HS+TGFβ cohort (H) versus HS alone (C), this difference did not reach statistical significance. Similarly, we observed slight decreases in glycolytic reserve between RS+TGFβ (H) vs. RS alone (C), which was also was not statistically significant. These data suggested that TGFβ further slightly enhanced the glycolytic metabolic phenotype (although statistically insignificant) in TISCs from both RS and HS cohorts. (I,J) OCR studies following stimulation with TGFβ demonstrated that RS diet cohort maintained OXPHOS phenotype. The respiratory reserve capacity of all 4 passages of HS+TGFβ (J) versus HS alone (F) showed statistically significant differences, suggesting that TGFβ further reduced the OXPHOS metabolism in chronic HS diet, leading to enhanced glycolytic metabolism, which is needed to produce additional macromolecules associated with cancerous cell differentiation and proliferation in Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (K–N) The glycolytic reserve changes (K) and respiratory reserve changes (L); alongside these changes, after TGFβ treatment (M,N), the 4T1-BALB/cJ model followed a similar pattern to the Py230-C57Bl/6J model mentioned above. Data analyzed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons and presented as mean ± SEM; n = 6 (biological replicates) per cohort; (*) p-value < 0.05.
Figure 7.
Chronic HS diet induced a metabolic phenotype switch in TISCs. The TISCs obtained from explanted tumors in each of the four passages in RS and HS dietary cohorts were cultured in base DMEM media without glucose and glutamine. pH-sensitive measurement of extracellular acidification rate (ECAR, A–C) was assessed by time-course changes in lactate production following addition of 100 mM glucose (gluc), mitochondrial inhibitor oligomycin (oligo, 2.5 μM), and glycolysis inhibitor 2-deoxy glucose (2DG, 500 mM). (A) Passage 1 TISCs from RS cohort (Py230-C57Bl/6J) demonstrated increased glycolytic activity following treatment with mitochondrial inhibitor (oligo) compared to HS diet counterparts, suggesting that TISCs from HS diet cohort were already at saturation capacity of glycolysis which could not be further enhanced by oligo treatment. (B) Passage 4 TISCs from RS cohort also demonstrated increased glycolytic activity following treatment with mitochondrial inhibitor (oligo) compared to HS diet counterparts, suggesting that TISCs from HS diet cohort were already at saturation capacity of glycolysis which could not be further enhanced by oligo treatment. (C) Comparisons in the glycolytic reserve capacity among TISCs from each of the four passages demonstrated that RS diet cohort had higher glycolytic reserve compared to HS diet cohort, suggesting that glycolysis is the major metabolic pathway in TISCs under HS dietary conditions. For measuring oxygen consumption rate (OCR, D–F) to determine the mitochondrial metabolism, the TISCs were cultured in base DMEM media with 100 mM glucose for basal OCR response, followed by time-course response changes with addition of mitochondrial inhibitors (oligo, 2.5 μM), proton gradient disruptor (carbonyl cyanide-4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone, FCCP, 500 nM) and rotenone/antimycin A (Rot/AntiA, 50/100 nM). (D) Passage 1 TISCs from RS cohort (Py230-C57Bl/6J) demonstrated increased basal OCR over HS cohort counterparts, suggesting that TISCs from RS cohort have oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) metabolic phenotype. Following treatment with metabolic inhibitors (oligo, FCCP, Rot/AntiA), TISCs from both cohorts demonstrated a similar change in OCR pattern. (E) Passage 4 TISCs from RS cohort (Py230-C57Bl/6J) demonstrated increased basal OCR over HS cohort counterpart, suggesting that TISCs from RS cohort have oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) metabolic phenotype. (F) Comparison of apparent respiratory reserve capacity among both cohorts demonstrated that TISCs from HS diet cohort in all four passages have higher OXPHOS reserve over their RS counterparts, suggesting that while OXPHOS is the major metabolic phenotype in RS cohort, glycolysis is the major metabolic phenotype in HS cohort. (G,H) ECAR studies following stimulation with TGFβ demonstrated that HS diet cohort maintained glycolytic phenotype. Although we noticed a slight decrease in glycolytic reserve capacity in HS+TGFβ cohort (H) versus HS alone (C), this difference did not reach statistical significance. Similarly, we observed slight decreases in glycolytic reserve between RS+TGFβ (H) vs. RS alone (C), which was also was not statistically significant. These data suggested that TGFβ further slightly enhanced the glycolytic metabolic phenotype (although statistically insignificant) in TISCs from both RS and HS cohorts. (I,J) OCR studies following stimulation with TGFβ demonstrated that RS diet cohort maintained OXPHOS phenotype. The respiratory reserve capacity of all 4 passages of HS+TGFβ (J) versus HS alone (F) showed statistically significant differences, suggesting that TGFβ further reduced the OXPHOS metabolism in chronic HS diet, leading to enhanced glycolytic metabolism, which is needed to produce additional macromolecules associated with cancerous cell differentiation and proliferation in Py230-C57Bl/6J tumor model. (K–N) The glycolytic reserve changes (K) and respiratory reserve changes (L); alongside these changes, after TGFβ treatment (M,N), the 4T1-BALB/cJ model followed a similar pattern to the Py230-C57Bl/6J model mentioned above. Data analyzed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons and presented as mean ± SEM; n = 6 (biological replicates) per cohort; (*) p-value < 0.05.
Figure 8.
Schematic representation of the mechanistic role of chronic HS diet in tumorigenesis. (A) Intratumor accumulation of high salt during the early phase of tumorigenesis. (B) High salt activates cytotoxic immune responses. (C) Early-phase immune-elimination response causing tumor regression. (D) During chronic high-salt conditions, there is an enhanced frequency of TISCs in the tumor. These TISCs, due to their immune privilege, can evade cytotoxic immune responses and differentiate into tumor cells. (E) The TISCs under the influence of TGFβ cytokines induce cell surface expression of CD80 molecule. The CD80 on TISCs selectively binds with CTLA4 on T-lymphocytes causing immune exhaustion and blunting of cytotoxic responses. (F) In this delayed phase of high-salt conditions, a cumulative impact of increased frequency of TISCs and immune exhaustion results in resurgence, causing tumorigenesis.
Figure 8.
Schematic representation of the mechanistic role of chronic HS diet in tumorigenesis. (A) Intratumor accumulation of high salt during the early phase of tumorigenesis. (B) High salt activates cytotoxic immune responses. (C) Early-phase immune-elimination response causing tumor regression. (D) During chronic high-salt conditions, there is an enhanced frequency of TISCs in the tumor. These TISCs, due to their immune privilege, can evade cytotoxic immune responses and differentiate into tumor cells. (E) The TISCs under the influence of TGFβ cytokines induce cell surface expression of CD80 molecule. The CD80 on TISCs selectively binds with CTLA4 on T-lymphocytes causing immune exhaustion and blunting of cytotoxic responses. (F) In this delayed phase of high-salt conditions, a cumulative impact of increased frequency of TISCs and immune exhaustion results in resurgence, causing tumorigenesis.