Next Article in Journal
Autophagy Genes for Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration in a Finnish Case-Control Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Chromosome Mapping of 5S Ribosomal Genes in Indo-Pacific and Atlantic Muraenidae: Comparative Analysis by Dual Colour Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation
Previous Article in Journal
Finding MEMO—Emerging Evidence for MEMO1′s Function in Development and Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multiple Sex Chromosomes and Evolutionary Relationships in Amazonian Catfishes: The Outstanding Model of the Genus Harttia (Siluriformes: Loricariidae)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/genes11111317
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

B Chromosomes and Cytogenetic Characteristics of the Common Nase Chondrostoma nasus (Linnaeus, 1758)

by
Alicja Boroń
*,
Anna Grabowska
,
Aneta Spóz
and
Anna Przybył
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury, M. Oczapowskiego St. 5, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2020, 11(11), 1317; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111317
Submission received: 7 October 2020 / Revised: 30 October 2020 / Accepted: 2 November 2020 / Published: 6 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fish Cytogenetics: Present and Future)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Supernumerary B chromosomes (Bs) are very promising structures, among others, in that they are an additional genomic compartment for evolution. In this study, we tested the presence and frequency of B chromosomes and performed the first cytogenetic examination of the common nase (Chondrostoma nasus). We investigated the individuals from two populations in the Vistula River basin, in Poland, according to the chromosomal distribution of the C-bands and silver nucleolar organizer regions (Ag-NORs), using sequential staining with AgNO3 and chromomycin A3 (CMA3). Furthermore, we analyzed the chromosomal localization of two rDNA families (45S and 5S rDNA) using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with rDNA probes. Chondrostoma nasus individuals showed a standard (A) chromosome set consisting of 2n = 50: 12 metacentric, 32 submetacentric, and 6 acrocentric chromosomes (NF = 94). Fourteen out of the 20 analyzed individuals showed 1–2 mitotically unstable submetacentric B chromosomes of different sizes. Six of them, in 14.1% of the analyzed metaphase plates, had a single, medium-sized submetacentric B (Bsm) chromosome (2n = 51) with a heterochromatic block located in its pericentromeric region. The other seven individuals possessed a Bsm (2n = 51) in 19.4% of the analyzed metaphase plates, and a second Bsm chromosome (2n = 52), the smallest in the set, in 15.5% of metaphase plates, whereas one female was characterized by both Bsm chromosomes (2n = 52) in 14.3% of the analyzed metaphase plates. AgNORs, GC-rich DNA sites, and 28S rDNA hybridization sites were observed in the short arms of two submetacentric chromosome pairs of A set. The constitutive heterochromatin was visible as C bands in the centromeric regions of almost all Chondrostoma nasus chromosomes and in the pericentromeric region of several chromosome pairs. Two 5S rDNA hybridization sites in the pericentromeric position of the largest acrocentric chromosome pair were observed, whereas two other such sites in co-localization on a smaller pair of NOR chromosomes indicate a species-specific character. The results herein broaden our knowledge in the field of B chromosome distribution and molecular cytogenetics of Chondrostoma nasus: a freshwater species from the Leuciscidae family.

1. Introduction

B chromosomes (Bs), known as supernumerary or accessory chromosomes, are found in addition to standard A chromosomes, though they are not homologous to them. Because Bs are not essential parts of the genome, they vary in number among individuals, they are present in some, but not all, individuals, and are even present in certain cells of the same individual, but not in all [1,2]. Even if B chromosomes are not present in all individuals in the population, they may be present in most of the populations, such as is the case in the red-eye tetra, Moenkhausia sanctaefilomenae (Steindachner, 1907) [3]. Sometimes, their distribution seems to be sex dependent [4]. Supernumerary B chromosomes have been found in 2087 plants, 744 animals, and 14 fungi species [2,5,6]. Considering animals, the species possessing Bs are mainly insects (520 species), mammals (117 species), and ray-finned fish Actinopterygii (99 species) [5,7]. The presence of Bs may disturb the processes of mitosis and meiosis, and presumably because of this, only one or two such chromosomes are often recorded [1,6]. However, there are animal species with 5 or 10 Bs; the highest number being for the rodent Apodemus peninsulae (Muridae) with viz. 2n = 48 + 30B [2].
Among ray-finned fish, the occurrence of Bs is well documented in approximately 46 different taxa of neotropical fish from the order Characiformes, 28 species of Siluriformes, 19 different taxa of Perciformes, five Cypriniformes, and in a significantly lower number of other fish taxa [1,6]. The highest number of Bs (16) was observed in the cascarudo Callichthys callichthys (Linnaeus, 1758): a freshwater catfish from the family Callichthyidae distributed in South America [8]. Supernumerary chromosomes in fish vary greatly in size: from microchromosomes, such as in streaked prochilod Prochilotus lineatus (Valenciennes, 1837) [9], M. sanctaefilomenae [3], and Amazon molly Poecilia formosa (Girard, 1859) [10], through to medium-sized chromosomes, such as in Rhamdia species [11], to macrochromosomes detected among others in some populations of Astyanax scabripinnis (Jenyns, 1842) [12]. Macrochromosomes have been also found in two species from the family Leuciscidae [13]: the roach Rutilus rutilus (Linnaeus, 1758) [14,15] and bleak Alburnus alburnus (Linnaeus, 1758) [14,16,17]. In related cyprinid fish from the family Cyprinidae, such as the Prussian carp Carassius gibelio (Bloch, 1782) [18,19] and some hybrids of Carassius taxa [20], B microchromosomes have been detected. A. alburnus is distinguished by the fact that it possesses one of the largest B chromosomes ever found in vertebrates [17]. Furthermore, the B macrochromosomes of A. scabripinnis [12] and R. rutilus are similar in size to the A chromosomes [14].
B chromosomes can be derived intraspecifically from the A chromosome set of the host species, constituting a heterogonous mixture of genomic parasites as in Astatotilapia latifasciata (Regan, 1929) [21]. They can also be the result of evolutionary genome reduction as in Tetraodontidae [22] or from the sex chromosomes as in the characid fish Characidium gomesi [23]. Furthermore, they can result from interspecific hybridization, which provides foreign DNA from a closely related species [3,23] as in A. alburnus [14]. On the other hand, a portion of sex chromosomes in some cichlid species seems to be derived from B chromosomes [24].
The different staining techniques used in the initial period of B chromosome studies showed their heterochromatic nature [4,22]. The results of animals Bs investigated by chromosome mapping show that they are composed of different repetitive DNA sequences from the standard genome [21,23,25] and/or the B chromosome-specific DNA [14,17]. Moreover, recent findings from high-scale omics analyses indicated that studies of B chromosomes may contribute to the elucidation of many processes as they may affect the expression of genes located in A chromosomes [5]. Regardless of the techniques used, karyotyping is an essential step prior to genome sequencing to avoid problems in genome assembly and analytical biases created by the presence of high-copy-number sequences on the B chromosome [21].
The supernumerary chromosome has been described in the common nase Chondrostoma nasus (Linnaeus, 1758), which, like R. rutilus and A. alburnus, represents the leuciscid species from the subfamily Leuciscinae [13,26]. The common nase is widely distributed in Europe, but is invasive in some countries, and is locally threatened by damming, destruction of spawning sites, habitat loss, and pollution [27]. According to the limited data, Chondrostoma nasus is characterized by 2n = 50 chromosomes [28,29], similar as better cytogenetically known related species from the genus Chondrostoma, such as C. lusitanicum [30,31] and other Iberian chondrostomine taxa [32]. The exceptions are Chondrostoma nasus individuals from the Zeljeznica River in Bosnia and Herzegovina, possessing a karyotype of 2n = 51 chromosomes [26]. These data inspired the present study aiming to verify whether it was a random discovery, or whether the Chondrostoma nasus elsewhere in its range of distribution also have a single chromosome or perhaps more B chromosomes. We tested the presence and frequency of B chromosomes in the karyotype of Chondrostoma nasus from two populations in the Vistula River basin, in Poland. This study also presents the first cytogenetic characterization of Chondrostoma nasus, such as the chromosomal distribution of constitutive heterochromatin by C-banding, GC-rich DNA sites by CMA3 staining, nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) using the silver nitrate staining (AgNO3) and FISH mapping with 28S rDNA probe, and chromosomal localization of 5S rDNA. In this way, we provided new data about the structure of the A and B chromosome set of Chondrostoma nasus and enhanced the knowledge about the chromosomal and genomic diversity of the freshwater fish. The results add to the limited knowledge base of B chromosomes and their host species, of which Chondrostoma nasus is an example, with respect to global biodiversity.

2. Materials and Methods

Standard procedures for catching fish in aquaculture were employed during the study. Fish sampling and valid protocols for animal use in experiments were performed according to the European animal welfare recommendations and upon consent obtained from the Local Ethics Commission of the UWM in Olsztyn, Poland (No. 20/2013/N). Fish were injected intraperitoneally with the colchicine solution and kept in well-aerated aquaria for 1.5 h; they were then sacrificed using an overdose of anesthetics (MS-222 dose 0.15 g L−1). Kidneys were taken from the dead fish.
In total, 20 individuals of the common nase were studied: 15 juveniles, 2 females and 3 males. Among them, 17 individuals (12 juveniles, 2 females and 3 males) were captured using nets from the Wisłok River (49°51′57″ N, 21°47′08″ E), the Vistula River drainage area (Baltic Sea basin) by electrofishing, before being transported alive to the laboratory in the Department of Zoology. Furthermore, three juveniles were the result of induced reproduction between Chondrostoma nasus females and males collected from the Martwa Wisła (54°24′36″ N, 18°39′39″ E), the Vistula River drainage area (Baltic Sea basin). These rivers are separated from each other by c. 620 km and by several hundred kilometers through their connection with the Vistula River. As is typical for Chondrostoma nasus, the specimens examined had a straight mouth, a lower lip with a thick cornified sheath, a dorsal fin with 9.5 branched rays, an anal fin with 10–11.5 branched rays, and red pectoral, pelvic, anal and caudal fins [27,29].
Mitotic chromosome preparations were made from each individual as described by Boroń et al. [33]. First, live fish were injected with a dose of 1 mL of 0.05% colchicine solution per 100 g of body weight. Mitotic chromosomes were obtained from kidney cell suspensions using the air-drying method. The kidney cells were exposed to a hypotonic solution (0.075 M KCl) for 30 min and fixed in methanol:acetic acid (3:1). Chromosomes were stained with a solution of 4% Giemsa (pH = 6.8) and were counted in at least 25 metaphase plates from each fish. Chromosome morphology was determined according to Levan et al. [34], and thus, they were classified as metacentric (m), submetacentric (sm), subtelocentric (st), and acrocentric (a), and were arranged according to karyotype in a decreasing size order.
The silver nitrate (AgNO3) staining technique was used to detect the nucleolus organizer regions (NORs) which were functionally active in the preceding interphase. The NORs represent the chromosomal regions where the multiple copy clusters of major (18S, 5.8S, and 28S) ribosomal genes (rDNAs) are located. Chromomycin A3 (CMA3) staining detects chromosomal regions that contain GC-rich DNA [35]. Chromosome slides of two females, three juveniles and three males were sequentially stained with AgNO3 and CMA3, according to Sola et al. [35]. C-banding was carried out according to Sumner [36]. At least 15 metaphase plates from each individual were analyzed using MultiScan software (Computer Scanning Systems) with the Karyotype supplement.
The fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) procedure described by Boroń et al. was used [33]. The loach 28S rDNA probe was labeled by digoxigenin-11-dUTP (Roche) while the 5S rDNA probe was amplified by PCR, as described by Kirtiklis et al. [37], and labeled by nick translation with biotin-16-dUTP (20-deoxyuridine 5′-triphosphate, Roche). The procedure was performed with RNase-pretreated and formamide-denatured chromosome slides, followed by hybridization with 200 ng of rDNA probes per slide. Post-hybridization and washing in 70% low stringency conditions (37 °C, 20 min), chromosome slides were subjected to detection with anti-digoxigenin-rhodamine (Roche) and avidin-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC; Roche, Basel, Switzerland) for 28S and 5S rDNA probes, respectively. Slides were counterstained with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI; Vector). Hybridization signals in at least 15 metaphase plates for each individual were observed under a Nikon Eclipse 90i fluorescence microscope using the set of filters for DAPI, FITC, and rhodamine. Dual-color FISH images were taken using a high-resolution ProgRes MFcool camera (Jenoptik) and processed using Lucia software 2.0 (Laboratory Imaging). Voucher specimens were preserved, frozen, and deposited at the Department of Zoology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland.

3. Results

3.1. Karyotype and Banding Patterns

In total 796 Giemsa stained metaphase plates of 20 individuals were counted and analyzed. The majority (83.3%) contained 50 chromosomes, whereas a further 10.7% and 6.0% contained 51 and 52 chromosomes, respectively (Table 1). The individuals of the common nase (Chondrostoma nasus) showed a standard (A) chromosome set consisting of 2n = 50 chromosomes: 12 metacentric, 32 submetacentric, and 6 acrocentric (Figure 1A,B). The chromosome arm number (NF) was 94. The first metacentric pair (pair No. 1), the first submetacentric pair (pair No. 7), and acrocentric (pair No. 23) pairs were the biggest in the karyotype and similar in size. Acrocentric pairs (pair No. 23) were easily morphologically recognizable among the chromosomes (Figure 1A–F). Six individuals, five juveniles and one female, possessed a karyotype consisting of an A chromosome set (Table 1).
Contrarily, 14 individuals (70%) out of the 20 analyzed showed 1–2 mitotically unstable submetacentric B chromosomes of different sizes (Table 1; Figure 1C–F). Six of these (three juveniles from the Wisłok river and three from the Martwa Wisła River) had a single, medium-sized submetacentric B chromosome (Bsm) in 14.1% of the 248 analyzed metaphase plates (Table 1; Figure 1D). Bs were present in 7.4–19.4% of metaphases from each individual. In turn, four juveniles and all three males possessed a Bsm (2n = 51) and a second small B submetacentric chromosome (2n = 52) in 19.4% and 15.5% of the 258 analyzed metaphase plates, respectively (Table 1; Figure 1E,F). One and two Bs were present in 5.9–29.5% and 5.7–34.1% of metaphases from each individual, respectively. The small Bsm chromosome was the smallest in the chromosome set 2n = 52 of Chondrostoma nasus (Figure 1E,F). The remaining Chondrostoma nasus female was characterized by both Bsm chromosomes (2n = 52) in 14.3% of 56 metaphase plates (Table 1). None of the 20 karyologically analyzed Chondrostoma nasus individuals showed heteromorphic sex chromosomes.
The Ag-NORs were in the telomeric position on the short arms of two submetacentric chromosome pairs (No. 9 and 12; Figure 2A–D). However, only 10% of metaphases displayed four signals. Ag-NORs demonstrated intrapopulation variation; from 1 to 4 such positive NOR signals were detected, with pair No. 9 showing the principal NOR activity, and pair No. 12 sometimes showing one Ag-NOR-positive signal. No Ag-NORs were observed in the B chromosomes. In more than 70% of metaphases, four GC-rich DNA sites corresponding with AgNORs were detected by CMA3 (Figure 2E,F). Other metaphases displayed three (24%) or less CMA3-positive sites. Apart from the CMA3-positive signals in the NOR sites, at least four other such signals in the centromeric region of the largest (pair No. 23) and smallest acrocentric chromosome pairs were observed (Figure 2E).
The distribution of constitutive heterochromatin was visible as C bands in the centromeric regions of almost all Chondrostoma nasus chromosomes (Figure 3A–F) and in the pericentromeric region of some chromosome pairs (e.g., No. 1–4 and 11) and the larger Bsm chromosome, present in the karyotype of 2n = 51 (Figure 3D) and 2n = 52 chromosomes (Figure 3F).

3.2. FISH Mapping of 28S and 5S rDNA Loci

The 28S and 5S rDNA were analyzed in a subsample of specimens as reported in Table 2. In most of the metaphase plates (85%), the 28S rDNA hybridization signals were found in the short arms of four sm chromosomes, regardless of the number of chromosomes (50, 51, or 52) (Table 2; Figure 4). Therefore, consistent with Ag-NOR patterns, submetacentric chromosome pairs No. 9 and 12 carried a 28S rDNA cluster in the short arm. In most of metaphase plates, one of the 28S rDNA hybridization sites was commonly observed as an intense and broad signal, corresponding with Ag-NOR and CMA3 patterns, whereas the signals in the three other sites were less intense (Figure 4A,D,G).
The analysis using FISH with a 5S rDNA probe, revealed two to four loci (Table 2). All individuals showed four such loci (Figure 4B,E,H) in 92.8% of metaphase plates. They were located on the short arms of one submetacentric chromosome pair (pair No. 12, as shown in Figure 1C,F) and in a subcentromericsms position of one acrocentric chromosome pair (pair No. 23), which was the biggest pair of the acrocentric chromosomes (Figure 1). The obtained hybridization signals clearly differed in size and could be classified as larger for the two acrocentric chromosomes and smaller for the submetacentric chromosomes (Figure 4B,E,H). Two and three 5S rDNA hybridization sites were counted in 3.6% of metaphase plates (Table 2). Both classes of rDNA probes were often (in 86.7% of metaphase plates) co-localized on the short arms of one submetacentric chromosome pair (Figure 4C,F,I), which was identified as pair No. 12 in the Chondrostoma nasus karyotype.
Thus, Chondrostoma nasus is characterized by four 28S and 5S rDNA loci, and two in the synteny. Signal heteromorphism in the 28S rDNA sites, which was reflected in the heteromorphism of the active AgNORs, was detected on chromosome pair No. 9 (Figure 1F and Figure 4A,D,G). No sex-dependent variability in the cytogenetic features was found.

4. Discussion

The Chondrostoma nasus karyotype (2n = 50) presented in this study differs from that given by Barshiene [28] by the greater number of meta- and submetacentric chromosomes and the smaller number of acrocentric chromosomes. The species of the family Leuciscidae, of which Chondrostoma nasus is an example [13], are characterized by a stable diploid number (2n = 50) and conservative karyotype patterns in most of the analyzed species [32]. These chromosomes can be easily arranged into morphological categories in comparison with the representatives of the family Cyprinidae [38]. Species belonging to Chondrostoma s. l., from the genus Chondrostoma, Achondrostoma, Iberochondrostoma, Parachondrostoma, Protochondrostoma, and Pseudochondrostoma, possess a diploid chromosome number of 2n = 50, including 15 to 23 meta- and submetacentric chromosome pairs and 2 to 10 subtelo-acrocentric chromosome pairs [32]. Chondrostoma regium is an exception with a diploid number of 2n = 52 [39].
The demonstrated presence of B chromosomes in Chondrostoma nasus from the Vistula River basin confirms the previous data of individuals (2n = 51) from the Zeljeznica river in Bosnia-Herzegovina [26] and indicates that this species joined almost 100 other fish taxa characterized by Bs chromosomes. The category of the Bs may be different among species of one genus, e.g., in the genus Astyanax, a large metacentric chromosome was observed [40,41], whereas in several A. scabripinnis populations, large metacentric, submetacentric and a small metacentric chromosomes were found [42]. In turn, the Bs of A. alburnus show either a metacentric or submetacentric morphology [14,17]. Interestingly, the size of the larger Chondrostoma nasus B chromosome is similar to a medium-sized submetacentric chromosomes, whereas the second is clearly smaller than the A chromosomes. Regarding two other leuciscid species, the B chromosomes of R. rutilus are similar in size to the A set [14,17], whereas A. alburnus possesses extremely large supernumerary chromosomes that they are larger than the largest elements of the A set [14,17]. Thus, Chondrostoma nasus has joined the fish group possessing large B chromosomes.
In some species B chromosomes were found to be more frequent in females than in males or limited to males [4,43], whereas the Bs of Chondrostoma nasus were present in one female and males as well as in most juveniles. However, as the analyzed females differed in the presence of Bs, the research could be repeated on sexually mature individuals.
B chromosomes were found to be mostly heterochromatic [4,43] and, for example, A. alburnus characterized by one or two heterochromatic Bs, consisting of GC-rich DNA [14,17]. In turn, M. sanctaefilomenae is characterized by two B chromosome variants differing in their C-banding patterns, frequency, and abundance of 18S rDNA [3]. The common nase is different because chromosome B does not contain rDNA sequences but characterized by a large C-band in its pericentromeric region. The 28S rDNA hybridization sites in the karyotype of this species correspond with the Ag-NORs and CMA3-positive sites, and regardless of the chromosome number (2n = 50, 2n = 51, 2n = 52), they were located in two submetacentric chromosome pairs, but not in B chromosomes.
Although the number of active Ag-NORs in the karyotype of Chondrostoma nasus varied from one to four, FISH with a 28S rDNA probe detected all NOR clusters, both active and non-active. Two pairs of NOR-bearing chromosomes in the karyotype of the common nase represent a derived condition, i.e., an apomorphic state for Teleostei, whereas one pair of subtelocentric chromosomes with NOR sites on the short arms represent a plesiomorphic state. Karyotypes of Leuciscidae species are usually characterized by a single small submetacentric chromosome pair with NORs on the short arms [32,44]. However, some of Leuciscus species characterize by multiple NOR patterns [33,37] and the chondrostomine species possess two to four chromosome pairs bearing NORs [32,45]. The second pair of NOR-carrying chromosomes may be the translocation result of rDNA region from one ancestral NOR-bearing chromosome pair to another pair, as was suggested in the evolution of the C. lusitanicum karyotype [31]. This relative species, currently named Iberochondrostoma lusitanicum (Collares-Pereira, 1980), shares several cytogenetic features with Chondrostoma nasus, such as karyotype pattern, the number and location of Ag-NOR regions, and the size polymorphism of Ag-NOR and CMA3-positive sites on the submetacentric chromosome pair [32,46]. However, the compared species differ in the number of 28S rDNA hybridization sites that in the karyotype I. lusitanicum, there are usually three or four of such sites [30,31]. Similarly, the karyotypes of other species of Chondrostoma s. l. are mainly characterized by two, or from two to four, CMA3-positive sites, and by two AgNO3 as well as three or four 45S rDNA sites [32].
Concerning the number of 5S rDNA hybridization sites, the karyotype of Chondrostoma nasus is similar to certain related Chondrostoma s. l. species, but differently, they have four such sites terminally located on the subtelo-acrocentric chromosomes, and this pattern is suggested as the plesiomorphic state in Iberian chondrostominae species [32]. It is worth emphasizing that in all these species, the largest acrocentric chromosome pair (pair N. 23 in the karyotype of Chondrostoma nasus) contained 5S rDNA sites. Interestingly, to the best of our knowledge, 5S and 28S rDNA sites in a syntenic position on one chromosome pair is documented for the first time.
Although the 5S and 28S rDNAs were not found in the B chromosome of Chondrostoma nasus, their small size may have hindered detection by FISH; such is case with C. gomesi, which contains 5S rDNA copies but in arrays shorter than the minimum detectable size with this technique [23]. Moreover, in most cases, the DNA composition of B chromosomes is unknown, though in general, they are rich in several classes of repetitive DNA, including 5S and 45S ribosomal DNA, satellite DNA, histone genes, small nuclear DNA, mobile elements, and organellar sequences [1,23,25]. Presumably, the Bs of Chondrostoma nasus, such as in other animals and plants, gain their transmission advantage by exceeding the regular rate during cell division via the drive mechanism, which is not well understood [5,47]. Thus, B chromosomes are very promising structures that they can persist inside the cell and are an additional genomic compartment for evolution [23,47]. Therefore, further studies of Chondrostoma nasus individuals from other populations, the behavior of B chromosomes in diplotene cells, and the molecular structure and origin of their DNA sequences in relation to those of the A set are required.

5. Conclusions

The results obtained in this study significantly improve our knowledge in the field of B chromosome distribution and provide molecular cytogenetics of Chondrostoma nasus: a freshwater species from the Leuciscidae family. Most of the analyzed individuals of this species from two populations in the Vistula River drainage area, the Baltic Sea basin showed 1–2 mitotically unstable submetacentric B chromosomes. The detected in the A set, two pairs of NOR-carrying chromosomes and two pairs with 5S rDNA sites seem to be characteristic of Chondrostoma related species. In contrast, the 5S and 28S rDNA hybridization sites in a syntenic position on one chromosomes pair are a species-specific feature. The results herein are an example of the benefits of conducting chromosomal investigations, which act to stimulate further studies using more advanced molecular biology techniques.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B.; Data curation, A.S.; Formal analysis, A.S. and A.P.; Funding acquisition, A.B. and A.S.; Investigation, A.B., A.G., A.S. and A.P.; Methodology, A.B.; Project administration, A.B.; Software, A.P.; Supervision, A.B.; Validation, A.G. and A.S.; Visualization, A.G. and A.P.; Writing—original draft, A.B., A.G., A.S. and A.P.; Writing—review and editing, A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the project No. 12.610.006-110 of the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere thanks to Bartosz Jagusztyn, the University of Rzeszów, Poland and Roman Kujawa, UWM in Olsztyn, for material used for experiments, and to Katarzyna Porycka, for help in analysis and Marta Staniszewska for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Camacho, J.P.M. B Chromosomes. How widely distributed are B chromosomes? In The Evolution of the Genome; Gregory, T.R., Ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 223–286. [Google Scholar]
  2. D’Ambrosio, U.; Alonso-Lifante, M.P.; Barros, K.; Kovarik, A.; De Xacars, G.M.; Garcia, S. B-chrom: A database on B-chromosomes of plants, animals and fungi. New Phytol. 2017, 216, 635–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Utsunomia, R.; Silva, D.M.Z.D.A.; Ruiz-Ruano, F.J.; Araya-Jaime, C.; Pansonato-Alves, J.C.; Scacchetti, P.C.; Hashimoto, D.T.; Oliveira, C.; Trifonov, V.A.; Porto-Foresti, F.; et al. Uncovering the Ancestry of B Chromosomes in Moenkhausia sanctaefilomenae (Teleostei, Characidae). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Noleto, R.B.; Vicari, M.R.; Cestari, M.M.; Artoni, R.F. Variable B chromosomes frequencies between males and females of two species of pufferfishes (Tetraodontiformes). Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2012, 22, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahmad, S.F.; Martins, C. The Modern View of B Chromosomes under the Impact of High Scale Omics Analyses. Cells 2019, 8, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. B-Chrom database. Available online: http://www.bchrom.csic.es/ (accessed on 4 November 2020).
  7. Vujošević, M.; Rajičić, M.; Blagojević, J. B Chromosomes in Populations of Mammals Revisited. Genes 2018, 9, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Konerat, J.T.; Bueno, V.; Baumgartner, L.; Martins-Santos, I.C.; Margarido, V.P. B chromosome and NORs polymorphism in Callichthys callichthys (Linnaeus, 1758) (Siluriformes: Callichthyidae) from upper Paraná River, Brazil. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 2014, 12, 603–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Penitente, M.; Natal Daniel, S.; Elda Sobrinho Scudeler, P.; Foresti, F.; Porto-Foresti, F. B chromosome variants in Prochilodus lineatus (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae) analyzed by microdissection and chromosome painting techniques. Caryologia 2016, 69, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Nanda, I.; Schlupp, I.; Lamatsch, D.K.; Lampert, K.P.; Schmid, M.; Schartl, M. Stable inheritance of host species-derived microchromosomes in the gynogenetic fish Poecilia formosa. Genetics 2007, 177, 917–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Swarça, A.C.; Fenocchio, A.S.; Dias, A.L. An update Cytogenetic Review for Species of the Families Pseudopimelodidae, Pimelodidae and Heptapteridae (Pisces, Siluriformes). Suggestion of a Cytotaxonomical Classification. Caryologia 2007, 60, 338–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Castro, J.P.; Moura, M.O.; Moreira-Filho, O.; Shibatta, O.A.; Santos, M.H.; Nogaroto, V.; Vicari, M.R.; Almeida, M.C.; Artoni, R.F. Diversity of the Astyanax scabripinnis species complex (Teleostei: Characidae) in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil: Species limits and evolutionary inferences. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2015, 25, 231–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schönhuth, S.; Vukić, J.; Šanda, R.; Yang, L.; Mayden, R.L. Phylogenetic relationships and classification of the Holarctic family Leuciscidae (Cypriniformes: Cyprinoidei). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2018, 127, 781–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ziegler, C.G.; Lamatsch, D.K.; Steinlein, C.; Engel, W.; Schartl, M.; Schmid, M. The giant B chromosome of the cyprinid fish Alburnus alburnus harbours a retrotransposon-derived repetitive DNA sequence. Chromosome Res. 2003, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ráb, P.; Roth, P. Chromosome studies in European Leuciscine fishes (Pisces, Cyprinidae). Aneuploidy due to B-chromosome in Rutilus rutilus. Folia Zool. 2007, 38, 333–337. [Google Scholar]
  16. Vujosevic, M.; Zivkovic, S.; Rimsa, D.; Jurisic, S.; Cakic, P. The chromosomes of 9 fish species from Dunav basin in Yugoslavia. Ichthyologia 1983, 15, 29–40. [Google Scholar]
  17. Schmid, M.; Ziegler, C.G.; Steinlein, C.; Nanda, I.; Schartl, M. Cytogenetics of the bleak (Alburnus alburnus), with special emphasis on the B chromosomes. Chromosome Res. 2006, 14, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, X.Y.; Zhang, Q.Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.J.; Wang, D.; Gui, J.F. Extra microchromosomes play male determination role in polyploid gibel carp. Genetics 2016, 203, 1415–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Przybył, A.; Przybylski, M.; Spóz, A.; Juchno, D.; Szabelska, A.; Kowalewska, K.; Boroń, A. Sex, size and ploidy ratios of Carassius gibelio from Poland. Aquat. Invasions 2020, 15, 335–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kucinski, M.; Demska-Zakes, K.; Zarski, D.; Liszewski, T.; Fopp-Bayat, D.; Jankun, M.; Furgala-Selezniow, G. The morphological, histological and cytogenetic characteristics of goldfish Carassius auratus (L.) × common carp Cyprinus carpio (L.) hybrids. Caryologia 2015, 68, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Valente, G.T.; Conte, M.A.; Fantinatti, B.E.A.; Cabral-de-Mello, D.C.; Carvalho, R.F.; Vicari, M.R.; Kocher, T.D.; Martins, C. Origin and Evolution of B Chromosomes in the Cichlid Fish Astatotilapia latifasciata Based on Integrated Genomic Analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014, 31, 2061–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Martinez, P.A.; Araújo, W.C.; Molina, W.F. Derived cytogenetic traits, multiple NORs and B chromosomes in the compact karyotype of Canthigaster figueiredoi (Tetraodontiformes). Mar. Genom. 2010, 3, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Serrano-Freitas, É.A.; Silva, D.M.Z.A.; Ruiz-Ruano, F.J.; Utsunomia, R.; Araya-Jaime, C.; Oliveira, C.; Camacho, J.P.M.; Foresti, F. Satellite DNA content of B chromosomes in the characid fish Characidium gomesi supports their origin from sex chromosomes. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2020, 295, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yoshida, K.; Terai, Y.; Mizoiri, S.; Aibara, M.; Nishihara, H.; Watanabe, M.; Kuroiwa, A.; Hirai, H.; Hirai, Y.; Matsuda, Y.; et al. B Chromosomes Have a Functional Effect on Female Sex Determination in Lake Victoria Cichlid Fishes. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Silva, D.M.Z.A.; Pansonato-Alves, J.C.; Utsunomia, R.; Araya-Jaime, C.; Ruiz-Ruano, F.J.; Daniel, S.N.; Hashimoto, T.; Oliveira, C.; Camacho, J.P.M.; Porto-Foresti, F.; et al. Delimiting the Origin of a B Chromosome by FISH Mapping, Chromosome Painting and DNA Sequence Analysis in Astyanax paranae (Teleostei, Characiformes). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e94896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Arkhipchuk, V.V. Chromosome Database; Database of Dr. Victor Arkhipchuk; 1999; Available online: www.fishbase.org (accessed on 5 November 2020).
  27. Kottelat, M.; Freyhof, J. Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes; Publications Kottelat, Cornol and Freyhof: Berlin, Germany, 2007; p. 646. ISBN 978-2-8399-0298-4. [Google Scholar]
  28. Barshiene, J.V. Karyotype studies in the under mouth Chondrostoma nasus. Citologia 1977, 19, 390–392. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  29. Vetešník, L.; Halačka, K.; Papoušek, I.; Mendel, J.; Šımková, A. The first record of a natural hybrid of the roach Rutilus rutilus and nase Chondrostoma nasus in the Danube River Basin, Czech Republic: Morphological, karyological and molecular characteristics. J. Fish Biol. 2009, 74, 1669–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Rodrigues, E.; Collares-Pereira, M.J. NOR polymorphism in the Iberian species Chondrostoma lusitanicum (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Genetica 1996, 98, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Collares-Pereira, M.J.; Ráb, P. NOR polymorphism in the Iberian species Chondrostoma lusitanicum (Pisces: Cyprinidae) re-examination by FISH. Genetica 1999, 105, 301–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pereira, C.S.A.; Ráb, P.; Collares-Pereira, M.J. Chromosomes of European cyprinid fishes: Comparative cytogenetics and chromosomal characteristics of ribosomal DNAs in nine Iberian chondrostomine species (Leuciscinae). Genetica 2012, 140, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Boroń, A.; Porycka, K.; Ito, D.; Abe, S.; Kirtiklis, L. Comparative molecular cytogenetic analysis of three Leuciscus species (Pisces, Cyprinidae) using chromosome banding and FISH with rDNA. Genetica 2009, 135, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Levan, A.; Fredga, K.; Sandberg, A.A. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 1964, 52, 201–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sola, L.; Rossi, A.R.; Iaselli, V.; Rasch, E.M.; Monaco, P.J. Cytogenetics of bisexual/unisexual species of Poecilia. II. Analysis of heterochromatin and nucleolar organizer regions in Poecilia maxicana by C-banding and DAPI, quinacrine, chromomycin and silver staining. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1992, 60, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sumner, A.T. A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp. Cell Res. 1972, 75, 304–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kirtiklis, L.; Porycka, K.; Boron, A.; Coutanceau, J.-P.; Dettai, A. Use of the chromosomal co-location of the minor 5S and the major 28S rDNA as a cytogenetic marker within the genus Leuciscus (Pisces, Cyprinidae). Folia Biol. 2010, 58, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ráb, P.; Collares-Pereira, M.J. Chromosomes of European cyprinid fishes (Cyprinidae, Cypriniformes). Folia Zool. 1995, 44, 193–214. [Google Scholar]
  39. Esmaeili, H.R.; Zareian, H.; Gholamhosseini, A.; Ebrahimi, M.; Gholami, Z.; Teimori, A.; Ansari, T.H. Karyotype Analysis of the King Nase Fish, Chondrostoma regium (Heckel, 1843) (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) from Iran. Turk J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 2010, 10, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Maistro, E.L.; Foresti, F.; Oliveira, C.; Almeida-Toledo, L.F. Occurrence of macro B chromosomes in Astyanax scabripinnis paranae (Pisces, Characiformes, Characidae). Genetica 1992, 87, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Salvador, L.B.; Moreira-Filho, O. B chromosomes in Astyanax scabripinnis (Pisces, Characidae). Heredity 1992, 69, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Fernandes, C.A.; Martins-Santos, I.C. Sympatric occurrence of three cytotypes and four morphological types of B chromosomes of Astyanax scabripinnis (Pisces, Characiformes) in the River Ivai Basin, state of Parana, Brazil. Genetica 2005, 124, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Camacho, J.P.M.; Sharbel, T.F.; Bekeboom, L.W. B-chromosome evolution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 2000, 355, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ráb, P.; Karakousis, Y.; Rábová, M.; Economidis, P.S. Banded karyotype of cyprinid fish Leuciscus borysthenicus. Ichthyol. Res. 1996, 43, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pereira, C.; Neto, A.; Collares-Pereira, M.J. Cytogenetic survey of species of two distinct genera of Iberian nases (Cyprinidae, Leuciscinae) that hybridize extensively in nature. I. Evidence of a similar and conserved chromosome pattern with some few species-specific markers at macro-structural level. Genetica 2009, 137, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Monteiro, R.; Carvalho, C.; Collares-Pereira, M.J. Karyotype and genome size of Iberochondrostoma almacai (Teleostei, Cyprinidae) and comparison with the sister-species I. lusitanicum. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2009, 32, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Houben, A. B chromosomes—A matter of chromosome drive. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Genes 11 01317 g001 550
Figure 1. Metaphase plates and karyotypes of the common nase (Chondrostoma nasus) with 2n = 50 chromosomes (A,B); 2n = 51 chromosomes (C,D); and 2n = 52 chromosomes (E,F); chromosomes are classified as metacentric (m); submetacentric (sm); acrocentric (a); B chromosomes (Bsm) are shown in Boxes. (bar = 10 µm).
Figure 1. Metaphase plates and karyotypes of the common nase (Chondrostoma nasus) with 2n = 50 chromosomes (A,B); 2n = 51 chromosomes (C,D); and 2n = 52 chromosomes (E,F); chromosomes are classified as metacentric (m); submetacentric (sm); acrocentric (a); B chromosomes (Bsm) are shown in Boxes. (bar = 10 µm).
Genes 11 01317 g001
Genes 11 01317 g002 550
Figure 2. Metaphase plates of the common nase (Chondrostoma nasus) with 2n = 52 chromosomes (A,B) and 2n = 50 chromosomes (D,E) stained with Giemsa (A) and sequentially using AgNO3 (B); stained with AgNO3 (D) and sequentially with CMA3 (E); silver nucleolar organizer regions (Ag-NORs) (C) and CMA3-positive (F) sites on the chromosome pairs No. 9 and 12. Arrows indicate: Ag-NOR carrying chromosomes (A); Ag-NOR sites (B,C,D) and corresponded CMA3-positive sites (E). Stars indicate other CMA3 positive sites (E). (Bar = 10 µm). Arrows indicate: Ag-NOR carrying chromosomes (A); Ag-NOR sites (B,C,D) and corresponded CMA3-positive sites (E). Stars indicate other CMA3 positive sites (E).
Figure 2. Metaphase plates of the common nase (Chondrostoma nasus) with 2n = 52 chromosomes (A,B) and 2n = 50 chromosomes (D,E) stained with Giemsa (A) and sequentially using AgNO3 (B); stained with AgNO3 (D) and sequentially with CMA3 (E); silver nucleolar organizer regions (Ag-NORs) (C) and CMA3-positive (F) sites on the chromosome pairs No. 9 and 12. Arrows indicate: Ag-NOR carrying chromosomes (A); Ag-NOR sites (B,C,D) and corresponded CMA3-positive sites (E). Stars indicate other CMA3 positive sites (E). (Bar = 10 µm). Arrows indicate: Ag-NOR carrying chromosomes (A); Ag-NOR sites (B,C,D) and corresponded CMA3-positive sites (E). Stars indicate other CMA3 positive sites (E).
Genes 11 01317 g002
Genes 11 01317 g003 550
Figure 3. Metaphase plates and karyotypes of the common nase (Chondrostoma nasus) with 2n = 50 chromosomes (A,B); 2n = 51 chromosomes (C,D); and 2n = 52 chromosomes (E,F) with C-banding; submetacentric B chromosomes (Bsm) are shown in Boxes. (Bar = 10 µm).
Figure 3. Metaphase plates and karyotypes of the common nase (Chondrostoma nasus) with 2n = 50 chromosomes (A,B); 2n = 51 chromosomes (C,D); and 2n = 52 chromosomes (E,F) with C-banding; submetacentric B chromosomes (Bsm) are shown in Boxes. (Bar = 10 µm).
Genes 11 01317 g003
Genes 11 01317 g004 550
Figure 4. Metaphase plates of the common nase (Chondrostoma nasus) with 2n = 50 chromosomes (A–C); 2n = 51 chromosomes (D–F); and 2n = 52 chromosomes (G–I) after fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis with 28S rDNA as a probe (A,D,G); 5S rDNA (B,E,H); and both of these sequences (C,F,I). 28S rDNA (red signals) and 5S rDNA (green signals) hybridization sites are shown by white arrows, whereas co-localizations of both these sequences are indicated by yellow arrows. (Bar = 10 µm).
Figure 4. Metaphase plates of the common nase (Chondrostoma nasus) with 2n = 50 chromosomes (A–C); 2n = 51 chromosomes (D–F); and 2n = 52 chromosomes (G–I) after fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis with 28S rDNA as a probe (A,D,G); 5S rDNA (B,E,H); and both of these sequences (C,F,I). 28S rDNA (red signals) and 5S rDNA (green signals) hybridization sites are shown by white arrows, whereas co-localizations of both these sequences are indicated by yellow arrows. (Bar = 10 µm).
Genes 11 01317 g004
Table
Table 1. The frequency of B chromosomes in the karyotype of Chondrostoma nasus; Number of analyzed metaphase plates = n.
Table 1. The frequency of B chromosomes in the karyotype of Chondrostoma nasus; Number of analyzed metaphase plates = n.
Number of Fish and SexnNumber of Metaphase Plates
with the Indicated Number of B Chromosomes
0
(2n = 50)		1
(2n = 51)		2
(2n = 52)
Five juveniles193193--
Female4141--
Three juveniles17415222-
* Three juveniles746113-
Four juveniles1701083329
Three males88601711
Female5648-8
* Individuals from the Martwa Wisła River.
Table
Table 2. The frequency of 28S and 5S rDNA hybridization sites in the karyotype of Chondrostoma nasus. Number of analyzed metaphase plates = n.
Table 2. The frequency of 28S and 5S rDNA hybridization sites in the karyotype of Chondrostoma nasus. Number of analyzed metaphase plates = n.
Number of Fish and SexNumber of Metaphase Plates
with the Indicated Number of		Co-Localization
of 28S and 5S rDNA Sites
28S rDNA Sites 5S rDNA Sites
n234n23412
Three juveniles454-41452-43441
Two females304224393234822
Three males45533756-353441
1201351021405513016104
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boroń, A.; Grabowska, A.; Spóz, A.; Przybył, A. B Chromosomes and Cytogenetic Characteristics of the Common Nase Chondrostoma nasus (Linnaeus, 1758). Genes 2020, 11, 1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111317

AMA Style

Boroń A, Grabowska A, Spóz A, Przybył A. B Chromosomes and Cytogenetic Characteristics of the Common Nase Chondrostoma nasus (Linnaeus, 1758). Genes. 2020; 11(11):1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111317

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boroń, Alicja, Anna Grabowska, Aneta Spóz, and Anna Przybył. 2020. "B Chromosomes and Cytogenetic Characteristics of the Common Nase Chondrostoma nasus (Linnaeus, 1758)" Genes 11, no. 11: 1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111317

APA Style

Boroń, A., Grabowska, A., Spóz, A., & Przybył, A. (2020). B Chromosomes and Cytogenetic Characteristics of the Common Nase Chondrostoma nasus (Linnaeus, 1758). Genes, 11(11), 1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111317

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop