Next Article in Journal
Plateau Grass and Greenhouse Flower? Distinct Genetic Basis of Closely Related Toad Tadpoles Respectively Adapted to High Altitude and Karst Caves
Next Article in Special Issue
Altered Hippocampal Epigenetic Regulation Underlying Reduced Cognitive Development in Response to Early Life Environmental Insults
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Caprine KRTAP28-1 and Its Effect on Cashmere Fiber Diameter
Previous Article in Special Issue
Suppression of Notch Signaling Stimulates Progesterone Synthesis by Enhancing the Expression of NR5A2 and NR2F2 in Porcine Granulosa Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/genes11020122
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of ADPKD-Related Genes and Pathways in Cells Overexpressing PKD2

by
Zhe Zhang
1,
Yanna Dang
1,
Zizengceng Wang
2,
Huanan Wang
2,
Yuchun Pan
1 and
Jin He
1,*
1
Department of Animal Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2
Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2020, 11(2), 122; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11020122
Submission received: 4 December 2019 / Revised: 20 January 2020 / Accepted: 21 January 2020 / Published: 22 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Next Gen Porcine Genetics and Genomics: Implications for Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Consistent with the gene dosage effect hypothesis, renal cysts can arise in transgenic murine models overexpressing either PKD1 or PKD2, which are causal genes for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). To determine whether PKD gene overexpression is a universal mechanism driving cystogenesis or is merely restricted to rodents, other animal models are required. Previously, we failed to observe any renal cysts in a transgenic porcine model of PKD2 overexpression partially due to epigenetic silencing of the transgene. Thus, to explore the feasibility of porcine models and identify potential genes/pathways affected in ADPKD, LLC-PK1 cells with high PKD2 expression were generated. mRNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed, and MYC, IER3, and ADM were found to be upregulated genes common to the different PKD2 overexpression cell models. MYC is a well-characterized factor contributing to cystogenesis, and ADM is a biomarker for chronic kidney disease. Thus, these genes might be indicators of disease progression. Additionally, some ADPKD-associated pathways, e.g., the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, were enriched in the cells. Moreover, gene ontology (GO) analysis demonstrated that proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle regulation, which are hallmarks of ADPKD, were altered. Therefore, our experiment identified some biomarkers or indicators of ADPKD, indicating that high PKD2 expression would likely drive cystogenesis in future porcine models.
Keywords:
ADPKD; RNA-seq; PKD2

1. Introduction

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is one of the most common genetic causes of end-stage renal disease, affecting millions of people worldwide [1]. As a systemic disease, ADPKD is characterized by the formation of gradually enlarged fluid-filled cysts in both kidneys along with extrarenal manifestations such as hypertension, hepatic/pancreatic cysts, intracranial aneurysms, and cardiac valve malformation [2]. Much effort has been made to study the cellular and molecular basis of ADPKD; however, in addition to renal replacement therapy, only tolvaptan has recently been approved for slowing disease progression [3]. PKD1 and PKD2 are two causal genes for ADPKD and account for approximately 85% and 15% of cases, respectively [4,5]. The proteins encoded by these genes, polycystin-1 (PC1) and polycystin-2 (PC2), are large transmembrane proteins residing in primary cilia, the plasma membrane, cell junctions, and the endoplasmic reticulum, where they participate in numerous signaling pathways and mediate cell proliferation, Ca2+ homeostasis, apoptosis, extracellular matrix deposition, planar cell polarity, and fluid secretion across the epithelium [1,6].
Several genetic hypotheses, e.g., the two-hit [7,8], third hit/renal injury [9,10,11], and dosage effect (reduced or increased PKD1/2 expression) [12,13], have been proposed to explain the etiology of ADPKD. Of these hypotheses, the two-hit model is widely accepted to explain the focal nature of cystogenesis in the disease, in which somatic inactivation of the remaining normal allele of PKD1 or PKD2 gene with the inherited germline mutant allele drives cysts formation. However, exceptional cases were observed, in which persistent expression of polycystins could be noted in cyst lining epithelia of some ADPKD patients, making dosage effect of polycystin above/under certain threshold a plausible explanation of ADPKD [14,15]. In tests of these hypotheses, both PKD1 and PKD2 transgenic rodent models exhibited renal cysts and other organ abnormalities [16,17]. Thus, overexpression of either wild-type (WT) or mutant PKD genes could drive cystogenesis due to the overexpression dosage effect. However, to date, only murine models have been established, and other animal models are required to recapitulate the phenotype and validate the overexpression model to exclude the species-specific propensity of renal cystogenesis. As pigs, which are similar to human beings in physiology, anatomy, and metabolism, are ideal large animal models for human diseases, we attempted to construct a PKD2 overexpression porcine model [18]. Unfortunately, no renal cysts were found in these pigs, which exhibited the same phenomena observed in some murine models [19,20]. One possible explanation is that due to low copy numbers or epigenetic silencing, the exogenous transgene is expressed at a level insufficient to drive pathological changes [19,20]. Therefore, to achieve high transgene expression without disruption of endogenous genes, site-specific integration of exogenous gene into safe harbor, would be preferable in future pig studies [21].
In the current study, to explore the feasibility of constructing PKD2 overexpression porcine models and identifying potential disrupted genes/pathways, LLC-PK1 cells were transfected with four PKD2 constructs of different genotypes. Via mRNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and enrichment analysis, three commonly upregulated genes (MYC, ADM, and IER3), along with enrichment of MAPK pathways and several biological processes involved in proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle regulation, were identified in our cellular overexpression models, indicating that these cellular models likely recapitulate ADPKD. The results not only provide functional information, e.g., biomarkers and disrupted pathways, regarding the progression of ADPKD but also facilitate the future characterization of porcine models of ADPKD.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plasmids

The plasmid pCAG-hPKD2-3×FLAG containing the WT human PKD2 gene sequence was customized and purchased from Cyagen (Suzhou, China). Then, a primer pair (PKD2-up and PKD2-down) was used to amplify the entire PKD2-3×FLAG sequence using Phusion high-fidelity polymerase (Thermo Fisher, Shanghai, China). The amplified fragment was gel purified (Thermo Fisher, Shanghai, China) and ligated into the NotI-digested pCAG-floxP-neo-pH11 plasmid using the In-fusion method (Takara, Dalian, China) to construct the pCAG-WThPKD2-3×FLAG-floxP-neo-pH11 (WT) plasmid. Finally, the mutant PKD2 plasmids pCAG-muhPKD2 c.A1532T/p.D511V-3×FLAG-floxP-neo-pH11 (Tg1), pCAG-muhPKD2 c.T1967G/p.L656W-3×FLAG-floxP-neo-pH11 (Tg2), and pCAG-muhPKD2 c.C2224T/p.R742X-3×FLAG-floxP-neo-pH11 (Tg3) were constructed using a site-specific mutation kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). A diagram of the PKD2 overexpression plasmid is shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S1.

2.2. Cell Culture and Transfection

LLC-PK1 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in 6-well plates in M199 medium (HyClone, GE, Beijing, China) containing 3% fetal bovine serum (HyClone, GE, Beijing, China). When the cells reached 80% confluency, three micrograms of each PKD2-containing plasmid and empty plasmid (pCAG-floxP-neo-pH11, NC) were transfected in quadruplicate using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher, Shanghai, China) according to the guidelines. Forty-eight hours later, one of the quadruplicate samples was used for protein extraction, while the other three replicates were used for RNA isolation.

2.3. Western Blot Analysis

Protein extraction was performed using Western and IP Cell Lysis Buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Approximately 30 µg of protein extract was loaded for SDS-PAGE. Anti-FLAG (M2, Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai, China) was used for immunoblotting at a dilution of 1:1000. Ponceau staining was used as loading control according to the manufacturer’s guideline (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). For detecting the expression of Polycystin-2 and MYC levels in transgenic pigs, kidney proteins from five years old transgenic pigs were prepared using the Western and IP Cell Lysis Buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) according to previously published protocols [18,22]. Anti-PC2 (E20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) and anti-cMyc (9E10, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) were employed with dilutions of 1:1000.

2.4. RNA-Seq

Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were harvested, and total RNA was extracted using a MiniBEST Universal RNA extraction kit (Takara, Dalian, China). Then, RNA was subjected to library construction and sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform (San Diego, CA, USA), and quality control was performed according to the Novogene (Beijing, China) pipeline. Salmon software (version 0.14.1) [23], which can efficiently quantify the transcript abundance without aligning reads to a reference genome, was used to quantify transcript-level abundances with a target pig transcriptome as the reference genome (ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-98/fasta/sus_scrofa/cdna/). Identification of the differentially expressed gene (DEG) set (adjusted p-value ≤ 0.05 and |log2Fold Change| ≥ 0.26) was then performed with the DESeq2 (version 1.26.0) package [24]. In addition, a threshold counts per million (CPM) value was set to exclude hits with low expression levels (CPM < 2) [25,26]. The expression data were submitted to the Gene Expression Omnibus with the following accession number: GSE141355.

2.5. Enrichment Analysis

DEGs were submitted to the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) tool (https://david.ncifcrf.gov) to identify significantly enriched gene ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways [27]. GO terms or KEGG pathways with a p-value of ≤ 0.05 were identified as functionally enriched.

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

qRT-PCR was performed using SYBR Green (Takara, Dalian, China) according to a previously established protocol [18]. The primers used are listed in Supplementary Materials Table S1. In brief, one microgram of RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA (complementary DNA) using an M-MLV kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Then, reactions were performed in a 15 µL volume containing 7.5 µL of SYBR Green, 0.2 µM each primer, and 1 µL of cDNA. The 2−ΔΔCt method was employed to analyze qRT-PCR data [28].

2.7. Statistics

One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test was employed to compare the expression levels of human PKD2, pig PKD2, MYC, ADM, IER3, and PKD1. Data are presented as the means ± standard errors of the mean (SEMs). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate significance.

2.8. Ethical Statement

All the procedures were conducted according to the guidelines developed by the China Council on Animal Care and Protocol, and approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of Zhejiang University (no. 11834 issued on 26 February 2018). The experiments conducted on the transgenic pigs were also approved by the China Agricultural University (no. AW31059102-3 issued on 31 March 2019, and no. SKLAB-2012-04-03 issued on 3 April 2012), where these transgenic pigs were.

3. Results and Discussion

Currently, no clinically approved drug can halt or reverse ADPKD. Tolvaptan, which is the only available chemical to slow disease progression, targets and inhibits arginine vasopressin V2 receptor mediated cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signaling pathways in collecting duct epithelial cells [3]. Since cysts arise from all nephron segments and collecting ducts, cell lines of proximal tubular origin could provide additional useful information regarding ADPKD [29]. In our study, LLC-PK1 cells were used to express four different genotypes of the PKD2 gene. This cell line was selected because it was isolated from the renal proximal tubule epithelium of a male Hampshire pig and is thus an ideal model for both kidney research and pig biomedical studies [30].
WT PKD2 was used to establish the pure overexpression model of ADPKD, and the Tg1, Tg2, and Tg3 mutations were selected based on the information in the ADPKD mutation database (http://pkdb.mayo.edu) [31]. Tg1 and Tg3 are listed as definitely pathogenic; Tg1 is considered a dominant-negative mutant disrupting intracellular calcium release [32], while Tg3 lacks the C-terminal tail and cannot interact with PC1 [33]. Tg2 was identified in a patient with early-onset ADPKD who harbored a homozygous PKD2-L656W mutation due to uniparental disomy [34]. The results of the structural study suggested that the Tg2 mutant is likely pathogenic owing to the disruption of the channel pore structure [35]. The backbone of the transgenic vectors comprises LoxP flanked Neomycin resistant cassette, CAG promoter, and a pH11 (pig Hipp11) sequence (Supplementary Materials Figure S1). The pH11 locus is validated as a promising safe-harbor for overexpressing exogenous genes in pigs [21]. Thus, these plasmids have dual purposes: when using transient expression method, the CAG promoter can drive high expression of transgene; when co-transfection with CRISPR/Cas9 targeting pH11 locus of pig embryonic fibroblasts, the stable transgenic cells could be selected and transgenic pigs can be generated then using marker-free strategy. Both purposes could in principle, maintain relatively high and consistent expression of the transgene.
After transfection of LLC-PK1 cells with the five plasmids, Western blotting was performed to confirm the expression of these proteins except Tg3, which lacks the C-terminal region and the FLAG epitope (Figure 1a). qRT-PCR was then carried out to validate the expression of human PKD2. As shown in Figure 1, human PKD2 had a very high expression level compared to NC, while the endogenous pig PKD genes were not affected. As we assumed that overexpression of these PKD2 constructs affects several signaling pathways and biological processes, some commonly regulated genes and pathways might be identified as potential contributors to ADPKD. Thus, RNA-seq was carried out, and DEGs were identified by separately comparing the reads from the WT, Tg1, Tg2, and Tg3 models with those from the NC model (Figure 2). Ten upregulated DEGs were found in the WT model (Supplementary Materials Table S2). A total of 290 DEGs were found in the Tg1 model; 196 were downregulated, and 94 were upregulated (Supplementary Materials Table S3). In the Tg2 model, 1504 DEGs were observed, comprising 520 downregulated and 975 upregulated genes (Supplementary Materials Table S4). The Tg3 model exhibited 217 DEGs; 89 downregulated genes and 128 upregulated genes (Supplementary Materials Table S5). Among these DEGs, MYC, ADM, and IER3 upregulations were found to be common to all four genotypes (Figure 3a), and this finding was further validated using qRT-PCR (Figure 4). The proto-oncogene MYC has been well studied as a critical factor in the progression of cystogenesis, and increased MYC expression levels have been found in both human patient specimens and murine models of ADPKD [36,37]. In addition, in several transgenic murine models with overexpression of either WT or mutant PKD genes, cMyc exhibited significant overexpression [38,39,40,41]. Recently, a causal relation between MYC and ADPKD has been proposed: in the context of either PKD1 overexpression or downregulation, MYC knockout could ameliorate cystogenesis, suggesting that MYC is an essential factor for cystogenesis [42]. In our previous study, PKD2 transgenic pigs were established based on the overexpression dosage effect hypothesis. The initial tests showed robust expression of exogenous gene in young transgenic pigs, for which we mistakenly believed that renal cysts would form after several years [18]. However, no renal cysts or other morphological manifestations were found later in the pigs. At the molecular level, equal amount of PC2 or MYC levels were noticed in the aging pigs despite the genotypes (Supplementary Materials Figure S2), indicating possible transgene silencing. The construction of the transgenic pigs took advantage of random integration and the CMV promoter, which were reported to be susceptible to epigenetic silencing [43,44,45,46,47,48]. Thus, the findings from our cellular models and transgenic pig model indicate the importance of consistent expression of MYC in the context of PKD2 overexpression, which might lead to cystogenesis in vivo. To our knowledge, no study has focused on the correlation between ADPKD and the ADM/IER3 genes. However, MYC/ADM/IER3 frequently appear in the lists of upregulated DEGs identified via transcriptomic analyses in various ADPKD-related studies [25,26,49,50,51,52,53]. In addition, adrenomedullin, encoded by ADM, is a potent hypotensive peptide and has been associated with hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD) [54,55]. One study showed that IER3 was upregulated in a model of CKD [56]. Since ADPKD can be considered a CKD and hypertension is a hallmark of ADPKD, ADM and IER3 upregulation might be useful as indicators of disease progression.
Next, the DEGs identified in these cells were subjected to GO and KEGG enrichment analyses using the DAVID tool (Supplementary Materials Tables S6–S13). The overlapping GO Biological Process (GO_BP) terms shared by the four genotypes (Figure 3b) included cell proliferation, apoptosis, response to stress, response to the extracellular stimulus, response to wounding, cell migration, and cell cycle regulation, which are key features of ADPKD and were also be found in two transcriptomic meta-analyses of ADPKD tissues [50,57]. In the analysis of overexpressed pathogenic PKD2, additional terms such as reactive oxygen species, morphogenesis of epithelium, nitric oxygen biosynthesis, MAPK regulation, and cytokine-mediated pathways were also enriched. The 10 DEGs overexpressed in the WT model were predicted to be involved in the MAPK, JNK, and p38MAPK pathways (Supplementary Materials Table S6 and Figure 3b). Thus, MAPK-related pathways were possibly perturbed in our cellular models. MAPK has been extensively studied in cystogenesis; while activated, phosphorylated ERK can enter the nucleus and subsequently mediate the activation of genes involved in abnormal proliferation, ultimately resulting in cyst formation [58]. Other related pathways critical in ADPKD but not commonly shared among the four genotypes included cell adhesion, PI3K pathway, and epidermal growth factor in the Tg1 model; Wnt-associated planar cell polarity, cell adhesion, response to cAMP, Wnt-calcium modulating pathway, and canonical Wnt signaling in the Tg2 model; and response to cAMP in the Tg3 model. KEGG pathways were also studied; however, no enriched term was common to the cellular models. A detailed analysis of each genotype showed that the NOD-like receptor signaling pathway and TNF signaling pathway were shared by the Tg1, Tg2, and Tg3 models. Previous reports suggested that in a diabetic nephropathy model, the NOD2-like receptor signaling pathway promotes renal injury, which is regarded as the third hit in ADPKD [59]. In addition, direct treatment of PKD2+/- kidneys with TNF-α led to aggravated cyst formation [60]. Thus, both of these pathways might be crucial for cystogenesis. Other pathways were also significantly enriched, e.g., the p53 pathway in the WT model; the JAK-STAT, p53, and NF-kappa B pathways in the Tg2 model; and the HIF-1 pathway in the Tg1 model. Therefore, in our enrichment study in cellular models, many previously characterized signaling pathways involved in ADPKD were identified as potential contributors to cystogenesis.

4. Conclusions

In the current study, by employing a cellular PKD2 overexpression strategy, we identified several disrupted pathways/processes related to ADPKD. Additionally, MYC, ADM, and IER3 were identified as potential disease contributors or indicators. This information not only provides the first identification of the shared genes and pathways affected based on the overexpression hypothesis in ADPKD but also lays a foundation for future characterization of porcine models of PKD2 overexpression.

Abbreviations:

ADPKDAutosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
PKD1/PKD2Polycystic kidney disease gene 1/2
PC1/2Polycystin-1/2
DEGDifferentially expressed gene
GOGene ontology; KEGG
KyotoEncyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
WTWild type
TgTransgenic
RNA-seqmRNA sequencing
MAPKMitogen-activated protein kinase
cDNAComplementary deoxyribonucleic acid
cAMPCyclic adenosin monophosphate

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/11/2/122/s1, Figure S1. Representative schematic of the PKD2 overexpression vector. A. The PKD2 overexpression vector can be readily used as a targeted integration transgenic vector when cotransfected with a CRISPR/Cas9 vector targeting the pig H11 locus. Three point mutations (c.A1532T/p.D511V, c.T1967G/p.L656W, and c.C2224T/p.R742X) for Tg1-3, respectively, are shown in solid blue lines above hPKD2. B. Representative alignment results of WT, Tg1, Tg2, and Tg3 PKD2 sequences. Mismatched sites are highlighted in yellow. Figure S2. Western blot analysis of PC2 (left panel) and MYC (right panel) expression in aging transgenic pigs showing similar expression levels of the proteins. Tg-P, the cloned pig with positive integration of exogenous gene; Tg-N, the cloned pig with negative integration of pig PKD2. Red arrows indicate the location of corresponding bands of PC2 and MYC. Figure S3. MA plots comparing the four genotype models with the control model. The blue nodes represent DEGs, while the green nodes represent genes that had p-values of less than 0.05 but did not satisfy the FC cutoff criterion. The triangles represent values that exceed the axis ranges of the graph. The node size varies with the magnitude of the |FC| value, Table S1. Oligos used in the study, Tables S2–S5. DEGs between the four different genotype models and the control model, Tables S6–S9. GO terms significantly enriched in DEGs of the four different genotype models, Tables S10–S13. KEGG pathways significantly enriched in DEGs of the four different genotype models. Table S14. Expression profile (calculated by DESeq2 in TPM) of all genes across all different genotypes.

Author Contributions

J.H. conceived the study and designed the experiment. Z.Z., Y.D., and Z.W. performed the experiments. Z.Z. and J.H. analyzed the data. J.H. wrote the manuscript. Z.Z., Y.D., Z.W., H.W., Y.P., and J.H. edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research and the APC was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (no. LY20C170001) and the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (no. 2019FZA6015).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Torres, V.E.; Harris, P.C. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: The last 3 years. Kidney Int. 2009, 76, 149–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Gabow, P.A. Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease—More Than a Renal Disease. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1990, 16, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Torres, V.E.; Higashihara, E.; Devuyst, O.; Chapman, A.B.; Gansevoort, R.T.; Grantham, J.J.; Perrone, R.D.; Ouyang, J.; Blais, J.D.; Czerwiec, F.S. Effect of Tolvaptan in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease by CKD Stage: Results from the TEMPO 3:4 Trial. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016, 11, 803–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pignatelli, P.M.; Pound, S.E.; Carothers, A.D.; MacNicol, A.M.; Allan, P.L.; Watson, M.L.; Wright, A.F. Multipoint mapping of adult onset polycystic kidney disease (PKD1) on chromosome. J. Med. Genet. 1992, 29, 638–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Mochizuki, T.; Wu, G.; Hayashi, T.; Xenophontos, S.L.; Veldhuisen, B.; Saris, J.J.; Reynolds, D.M.; Cai, Y.; Gabow, P.A.; Pierides, A.; et al. PKD2, a Gene for Polycystic Kidney Disease That Encodes an Integral Membrane Protein. Science 1996, 272, 1339–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chapin, H.C.; Caplan, M.J. The cell biology of polycystic kidney disease. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 191, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Reeders, S.T. Multilocus polycystic disease. Nat. Genet. 1992, 1, 235–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pei, Y. A ‘two-hit’ model of cystogenesis in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease? Trends Mol. Med. 2001, 7, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bastos, A.P.; Piontek, K.; Silva, A.M.; Martini, D.; Menezes, L.F.; Fonseca, J.M.; Fonseca, I.I.; Germino, G.G.; Onuchic, L.F. Pkd1 haploinsufficiency increases renal damage and induces microcyst formation following ischemia/reperfusion. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 20, 2389–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Takakura, A.; Contrino, L.; Zhou, X.; Bonventre, J.V.; Sun, Y.; Humphreys, B.D.; Zhou, J. Renal injury is a third hit promoting rapid development of adult polycystic kidney disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, 2523–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bell, P.D.; Fitzgibbon, W.; Sas, K.; Stenbit, A.E.; Amria, M.; Houston, A.; Reichert, R.; Gilley, S.; Siegal, G.P.; Bissler, J.; et al. Loss of primary cilia upregulates renal hypertrophic signaling and promotes cystogenesis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2011, 22, 839–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Eccles, M.R.; Stayner, C.A. Polycystic kidney disease—Where gene dosage counts. F1000 Prime Rep. 2014, 6, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hopp, K.; Ward, C.J.; Hommerding, C.J.; Nasr, S.H.; Tuan, H.-F.; Gainullin, V.G.; Rossetti, S.; Torres, V.E.; Harris, P.C. Functional polycystin-1 dosage governs autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease severity. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 4257–4273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ong, A.C.M.; Ward, C.J.; Butler, R.J.; Biddolph, S.; Bowker, C.; Torra, R.; Pei, Y.; Harris, P.C. Coordinate Expression of the Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Proteins, Polycystin-2 And Polycystin-1, in Normal and Cystic Tissue. Am. J. Pathol. 1999, 154, 1721–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ward, C.J.; Turley, H.; Ong, A.C.M.; Comley, M.; Biddolph, S.; Chetty, R.; Ratcliffe, P.J.; Gattner, K.; Harris, P.C. Polycystin, the polycystic kidney disease 1 protein, is expressed by epithelial cells in fetal, adult, and polycystic kidney. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 1524–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Nagao, S.; Kugita, M.; Yoshihara, D.; Yamaguchi, T. Animal models for human polycystic kidney disease. Exp. Anim. 2012, 61, 477–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Wilson, P.D. Mouse Models of Polycystic Kidney Disease. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2008, 84, 311–350. [Google Scholar]
  18. He, J.; Ye, J.; Li, Q.; Feng, Y.; Bai, X.; Chen, X.; Wu, C.; Yu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, X.; et al. Construction of a transgenic pig model overexpressing polycystic kidney disease 2 (PKD2) gene. Transgenic Res. 2013, 22, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, A.; Tian, X.; Zhang, X.; Huang, S.; Ma, Y.; Wu, D.; Moeckel, G.; Somlo, S.; Wu, G. Human polycystin-2 transgene dose-dependently rescues ADPKD phenotypes in Pkd2 mutant mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2015, 185, 2843–2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Cai, Y.; Fedeles, S.V.; Dong, K.; Anyatonwu, G.; Onoe, T.; Mitobe, M.; Gao, J.-D.; Okuhara, D.; Tian, X.; Gallagher, A.-R.; et al. Altered trafficking and stability of polycystins underlie polycystic kidney disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 5129–5144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ruan, J.; Li, H.; Xu, K.; Wu, T.; Wei, J.; Zhou, R.; Liu, Z.; Mu, Y.; Yang, S.; Ouyang, H.; et al. Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated transgene knockin at the H11 locus in pigs. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Ye, J.; He, J.; Li, Q.; Feng, Y.; Bai, X.; Chen, X.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, X.; Yu, Z.; Li, N. Generation of c-Myc transgenic pigs for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Transgenic Res. 2013, 22, 1231–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Patro, R.; Duggal, G.; Love, M.I.; Irizarry, R.A.; Kingsford, C. Salmon: Fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression using dual-phase inference. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 417–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Love, I.M.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kunnen, S.J.; Malas, T.B.; Semeins, C.M.; Bakker, A.D.; Peters, D.J.M. Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of fluid shear stress altered gene expression in renal epithelial cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 233, 3615–3628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Kunnen, S.J.; Malas, T.B.; Formica, C.; Leonhard, W.N.; Hoen, P.A.T.; Peters, D.J. Comparative transcriptomics of shear stress treated Pkd1−/− cells and pre-cystic kidneys reveals pathways involved in early polycystic kidney disease. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 108, 1123–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Devuyst, O.; Beauwens, R. Ion transport and cystogenesis: The paradigm of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Adv. Nephrol. Necker Hosp. 1998, 28, 439. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hull, R.N.; Cherry, W.R.; Weaver, G.W. The origin and characteristics of a pig kidney cell strain, LLC-PK. In Vitro 1976, 12, 670–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Mutation Database: PKDB. Available online: http://pkdb.mayo.edu (accessed on 30 October 2019).
  32. Koulen, P.; Cai, Y.; Geng, L.; Maeda, Y.; Nishimura, S.; Witzgall, R.; Ehrlich, B.E.; Somlo, S. Polycystin-2 is an intracellular calcium release channel. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hanaoka, K.; Qian, F.; Boletta, A.; Bhunia, A.K.; Piontek, K.; Tsiokas, L.; Sukhatme, V.P.; Guggino, W.B.; Germino, G.G. Co-assembly of polycystin-1 and -2 produces unique cation-permeable currents. Nature 2000, 408, 990–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Losekoot, M.; Ruivenkamp, C.A.L.; Tholens, A.P.; Grimbergen, J.E.M.A.; Vijfhuizen, L.; Vermeer, S.; Dijkman, H.B.; Cornelissen, E.A.M.; Bongers, E.M.H.F.; Peters, D.J.M. Neonatal onset autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) in a patient homozygous for a PKD2 missense mutation due to uniparental disomy. J. Med. Genet. 2012, 49, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Grieben, M.; Pike, A.C.W.; Shintre, C.A.; Venturi, E.; El-Ajouz, S.; Tessitore, A.; Shrestha, L.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Mahajan, P.; Chalk, R.; et al. Structure of the polycystic kidney disease TRP channel Polycystin-2 (PC2). Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017, 24, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Trudel, M.; D’Agati, V.; Costantini, F. C-myc as an inducer of polycystic kidney disease in transgenic mice. Kidney Int. 1991, 39, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Lanoix, J.; D’Agati, V.; Szabolcs, M.; Trudel, M. Dysregulation of cellular proliferation and apoptosis mediates human autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Oncogene 1996, 13, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kurbegovic, A.; Côté, O.; Couillard, M.; Ward, C.J.; Harris, P.C.; Trudel, M. Pkd1 transgenic mice: Adult model of polycystic kidney disease with extrarenal and renal phenotypes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19, 1174–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kurbegovic, A.; Trudel, M. Progressive development of polycystic kidney disease in the mouse model expressing Pkd1 extracellular domain. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013, 22, 2361–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Burtey, S.; Riera, M.; Ribe, E.; Pennekamp, P.; Passage, E.; Rance, R.; Dworniczak, B.; Fontés, M. Overexpression of PKD2 in the mouse is associated with renal tubulopathy. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2008, 23, 1157–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Park, E.Y.; Sung, Y.H.; Yang, M.H.; Noh, J.Y.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, T.Y.; Yook, Y.J.; Yoo, K.H.; Roh, K.J.; Kim, I.; et al. Cyst formation in kidney via B-raf signaling in the PKD2 transgenic mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 7214–7222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Parrot, C.; Kurbegovic, A.; Yao, G.; Couillard, M.; Côté, O.; Trudel, M. C-Myc is a regulator of the PKD1 gene and PC1-induced pathogenesis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2019, 28, 751–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, D.; Wang, C.E.; Zhao, B.; Li, W.; Ouyang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Yang, H.; Fan, P.; O’Neill, A.; Gu, W.; et al. Expression of Huntington’s disease protein results in apoptotic neurons in the brains of cloned transgenic pigs. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19, 3983–3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Garrick, D.; Fiering, S.; Martin, D.I.K.; Whitelaw, E. Repeat-induced gene silencing in mammals. Nat. Genet. 1998, 18, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Giraldo, P.; Rival-Gervier, S.; Houdebine, L.-M.; Montoliu, L. The potential benefits of insulators on heterologous constructs in transgenic animals. Transgenic Res. 2003, 12, 751–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. McBurney, M.W.; Mai, T.; Yang, X.; Jardine, K. Evidence for Repeat-Induced Gene Silencing in Cultured Mammalian Cells: Inactivation of Tandem Repeats of Transfected Genes. Exp. Cell Res. 2002, 274, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Hsu, C.-C.; Li, H.-P.; Hung, Y.-H.; Leu, Y.-W.; Wu, W.-H.; Wang, F.-S.; Lee, K.-D.; Chang, P.-J.; Wu, C.-S.; Lu, Y.-J.; et al. Targeted methylation of CMV and E1A viral promoters. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 402, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Brooks, A.R.; Harkins, R.N.; Wang, P.; Qian, H.S.; Liu, P.; Rubanyi, G.M. Transcriptional silencing is associated with extensive methylation of the CMV promoter following adenoviral gene delivery to muscle. J. Gene Med. 2004, 6, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Koupepidou, P.; Felekkis, K.N.; Kränzlin, B.; Sticht, C.; Gretz, N.; Deltas, C. Cyst formation in the PKD2 (1-703) transgenic rat precedes deregulation of proliferation-related pathways. BMC Nephrol. 2010, 11, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Chatterjee, S.; Verma, S.P.; Pandey, P. Profiling conserved biological pathways in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disorder (ADPKD) to elucidate key transcriptomic alterations regulating cystogenesis: A cross-species meta-analysis approach. Gene 2017, 627, 434–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Husson, H.; Manavalan, P.; Akmaev, V.R.; Russo, R.J.; Cook, B.; Richards, B.; Barberio, D.; Liu, D.; Cao, X.; Landes, G.M.; et al. New insights into ADPKD molecular pathways using combination of SAGE and microarray technologies. Genomics 2004, 84, 497–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dweep, H.; Sticht, C.; Kharkar, A.; Pandey, P.; Gretz, N. Parallel Analysis of mRNA and microRNA Microarray Profiles to Explore Functional Regulatory Patterns in Polycystic Kidney Disease: Using PKD/Mhm Rat Model. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Woo, Y.M.; Kim, D.Y.; Koo, N.J.; Kim, Y.-M.; Lee, S.; Ko, J.Y.; Shin, Y.; Kim, B.H.; Mun, H.; Choi, S.; et al. Profiling of miRNAs and target genes related to cystogenesis in ADPKD mouse models. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Dieplinger, B.; Mueller, T.; Kollerits, B.; Struck, J.; Ritz, E.; Von Eckardstein, A.; Haltmayer, M.; Kronenberg, F. Pro-A-type natriuretic peptide and pro-adrenomedullin predict progression of chronic kidney disease: The MMKD Study. Kidney Int. 2009, 75, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Ishimitsu, T.; Nishikimi, T.; Saito, Y.; Kitamura, K.; Eto, T.; Kangawa, K.; Matsuo, H.; Omae, T.; Matsuoka, H. Plasma levels of adrenomedullin, a newly identified hypotensive peptide, in patients with hypertension and renal failure. J. Clin. Investig. 1994, 94, 2158–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Dai, B.; David, V.; Martin, A.; Huang, J.; Li, H.; Jiao, Y.; Gu, W.; Quarles, L.D. A Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Identifying FGF23 Regulated Genes in the Kidney of a Mouse CKD Model. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Liu, N.; Huo, Y.; Chen, S.; Xu, D.; Yang, B.; Xue, C.; Fu, L.; Bu, L.; Song, S.; Mei, C. Identification of Key Genes and Candidated Pathways in Human Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease by Bioinformatics Analysis. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2019, 44, 533–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, W.; Liu, H.T. MAPK signal pathways in the regulation of cell proliferation in mammalian cells. Cell Res. 2002, 12, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Du, P.; Fan, B.; Han, H.; Zhen, J.; Shang, J.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Shi, W.; Tang, W.; Bao, C.; et al. NOD2 promotes renal injury by exacerbating inflammation and podocyte insulin resistance in diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2013, 84, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Li, X.; Magenheimer, B.S.; Xia, S.; Johnson, T.; Wallace, D.P.; Calvet, J.P.; Li, R. A tumor necrosis factor-α-mediated pathway promoting autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 863–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Genes 11 00122 g001 550
Figure 1. Validation of PKD2 overexpression in LLC-PK1 cells. (A) Western blot analysis of protein extracts from LLC-PK1 cells transfected with different plasmids (NC: pCAG-floxP-neo-pH11, WT: pCAG-WThPKD2-3×FLAG-floxP-neo-pH11, Tg1: pCAG-muhPKD2 c.A1532T/p.D511V-3×FLAG-floxP-neo-pH11, Tg2: pCAG-muhPKD2 c.T1967G/p.L656W-3 × FLAG-floxP-neo-pH11, Tg3: pCAG-muhPKD2 c.C2224T/p.R742X-3×FLAG-floxP-neo-pH11), showing that human PKD2 was expressed in WT-, Tg1-, and Tg2-transfected cells. Ponceau staining was used in the lower panel as loading control. (B–D) qRT-PCR results confirmed that endogenous pig PKD1 (B) and PKD2 (c) were not affected by the overexpression of the human PKD2 gene (D). Data are presented as the means ± SEMs. (n = 3; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 1. Validation of PKD2 overexpression in LLC-PK1 cells. (A) Western blot analysis of protein extracts from LLC-PK1 cells transfected with different plasmids (NC: pCAG-floxP-neo-pH11, WT: pCAG-WThPKD2-3×FLAG-floxP-neo-pH11, Tg1: pCAG-muhPKD2 c.A1532T/p.D511V-3×FLAG-floxP-neo-pH11, Tg2: pCAG-muhPKD2 c.T1967G/p.L656W-3 × FLAG-floxP-neo-pH11, Tg3: pCAG-muhPKD2 c.C2224T/p.R742X-3×FLAG-floxP-neo-pH11), showing that human PKD2 was expressed in WT-, Tg1-, and Tg2-transfected cells. Ponceau staining was used in the lower panel as loading control. (B–D) qRT-PCR results confirmed that endogenous pig PKD1 (B) and PKD2 (c) were not affected by the overexpression of the human PKD2 gene (D). Data are presented as the means ± SEMs. (n = 3; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Genes 11 00122 g001
Genes 11 00122 g002 550
Figure 2. Volcano plots showing the adjusted P-values and the log2 fold change (FC) values of genes in the four genotype models (WT, Tg1-3) versus the control (NC) model. DEGs, indicated by the red dots, were identified as genes with an adjusted p-value of ≤ 0.05 and |log2 FC| > 0.26. MYC, IER3, and ADM are indicated by the arrows.
Figure 2. Volcano plots showing the adjusted P-values and the log2 fold change (FC) values of genes in the four genotype models (WT, Tg1-3) versus the control (NC) model. DEGs, indicated by the red dots, were identified as genes with an adjusted p-value of ≤ 0.05 and |log2 FC| > 0.26. MYC, IER3, and ADM are indicated by the arrows.
Genes 11 00122 g002
Genes 11 00122 g003 550
Figure 3. Identification of the shared affected differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and pathways. (A) The Venn diagram of DEGs shows that three genes (MYC, IER3, and ADM) were shared by all the genotypes. (B) Bubble plot of significant overlapping gene ontology (GO) (biological process) terms enriched in genes from the DEG sets of the four genotypes, significant overlapping KEGG pathways overrepresented in the Tg1-3 models, and KEGG pathways significantly enriched in the wild type (WT) model.
Figure 3. Identification of the shared affected differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and pathways. (A) The Venn diagram of DEGs shows that three genes (MYC, IER3, and ADM) were shared by all the genotypes. (B) Bubble plot of significant overlapping gene ontology (GO) (biological process) terms enriched in genes from the DEG sets of the four genotypes, significant overlapping KEGG pathways overrepresented in the Tg1-3 models, and KEGG pathways significantly enriched in the wild type (WT) model.
Genes 11 00122 g003
Genes 11 00122 g004 550
Figure 4. qRT-PCR validation of the shared upregulated DEGs. (n = 3; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 4. qRT-PCR validation of the shared upregulated DEGs. (n = 3; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Genes 11 00122 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Z.; Dang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H.; Pan, Y.; He, J. Identification of ADPKD-Related Genes and Pathways in Cells Overexpressing PKD2. Genes 2020, 11, 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11020122

AMA Style

Zhang Z, Dang Y, Wang Z, Wang H, Pan Y, He J. Identification of ADPKD-Related Genes and Pathways in Cells Overexpressing PKD2. Genes. 2020; 11(2):122. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11020122

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Zhe, Yanna Dang, Zizengceng Wang, Huanan Wang, Yuchun Pan, and Jin He. 2020. "Identification of ADPKD-Related Genes and Pathways in Cells Overexpressing PKD2" Genes 11, no. 2: 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11020122

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop