Next Article in Journal
The Critical Role of miRNAs in Regulation of Flowering Time and Flower Development
Previous Article in Journal
Genes, Pathways, and Mechanisms Involved in the Virulence of Mucorales
Previous Article in Special Issue
Beyond Biodiversity: Can Environmental DNA (eDNA) Cut It as a Population Genetics Tool?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Conservation Genetics and Genomics

1
Department of Biology, The University of British Columbia, 3247 University Way, FIP346, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
2
Conservation Genomics, Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024-5102, USA
3
Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2020, 11(3), 318; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11030318
Submission received: 4 March 2020 / Accepted: 9 March 2020 / Published: 17 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conservation Genetics and Genomics)
For more than thirty years, methods and theories from evolutionary biology, phylogenetics, population genetics and molecular biology have been used by conservation biologists to better understand threats to endangered species due to anthropogenic changes. Commonly described as Conservation Genetics, the scope of research has included investigating effects of habitat fragmentation and over-harvesting on small populations, barriers to natural gene flow, uncertainty about units of conservation due to unresolved taxonomies and cryptic species, illegal and commercial trade in wildlife, and molecular ecology of threatened populations and species [1].
Advances in genomic tools, along with demonstration of their applicability to non-invasive sampling approaches often necessary for at-risk species, have greatly expanded the purview and value of this field of study [2]. This special issue of Genes on “Conservation Genetics and Genomics” features 14 original research articles harnessing the data collection and analytical approaches of population genomics, phylogenomics, and metagenomics to address questions of conservation concern. Traditional approaches using neutral genetic markers now take advantage of vastly expanded data sets of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) discovered in a variety of ways, including using restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD Seq) and reference genome mining [3]. Whole-genome sequencing has enabled elucidation of genome architecture, and exploration of the influences of genome-wide patterns and locus-specific effects of relevance to species of conservation concern [4,5,6]. Likewise, coalescent-based approaches applied to nuclear and organellar genomic data allow for more detailed approximations of recent and more distant evolutionary histories for endangered taxa of interest [7,8]. In other cases, broader phylogenetic understanding of a group can directly inform different kinds of conservation practice and measures [4,9]. Expanded analyses of historical and ancient DNA now afford novel opportunities for better understanding relevant processes, including contemporary and past hybridization [10,11,12]. In addition, metagenomics and environmental (e)DNA allow for broader access to genetically sample ecosystems in new and rapid ways [13,14,15]. Importantly, genomic technologies have opened avenues of research into genetic rescue and restoration, contributing to the field of de-extinction [16]. As extinction and habitat destruction become increasingly acute, expanding the technical approaches for understanding the genetics of endangered species is one of many essential aspects of conservation biology. We hope this special issue affords scientists involved in active research in the area a valuable update on genomics-focused conservation efforts and stimulus for continued interest in this crisis discipline.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. DeSalle, R.; Amato, G. The expansion of conservation genetics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5, 702–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Russello, M.A.; Waterhouse, M.D.; Etter, P.D.; Johnson, E.A. From promise to practice: Pairing non-invasive sampling with genomics in conservation. PeerJ 2015, 3, e1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Galla, S.J.; Forsdick, N.J.; Brown, L.; Hoeppner, M.P.; Knapp, M.; Maloney, R.F.; Moraga, R.; Santure, A.W.; Steeves, T.E. Reference Genomes from Distantly Related Species Can Be Used for Discovery of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms to Inform Conservation Management. Genes 2019, 10, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kolchanova, S.; Kliver, S.; Komissarov, A.; Dobrinin, P.; Tamazian, G.; Grigorev, K.; Wolfsberger, W.W.; Majeske, A.J.; Velez-Valentin, J.; Valentin de la Rosa, R.; et al. Genomes of Three Closely Related Caribbean Amazons Provide Insight for Species History and Conservation. Genes 2019, 10, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Sutton, J.T.; Helmkampf, M.; Steiner, C.C.; Bellinger, M.R.; Korlach, J.; Hall, R.; Baybayan, P.; Muehling, J.; Gu, J.; Kingan, S.; et al. A High-Quality, Long-Read De Novo Genome Assembly to Aid Conservation of Hawaiiʻs Last Remaining Crow Species. Genes 2018, 9, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Yuan, Y.; Zhang, P.; Wang, K.; Liu, M.; Li, J.; Zheng, J.; Wang, D.; Xu, W.; Lin, M.; Dong, L.; et al. Genome Sequence of the Freshwater Yangtze Finless Porpoise. Genes 2018, 9, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Dussex, N.; Von Seth, J.; Robertson, B.C.; Dalén, L. Full Mitogenomes in the Critically Endangered Kākāpō Reveal Major Post-Glacial and Anthropogenic Effects on Neutral Genetic Diversity. Genes 2018, 9, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Cortes-Rodriguez, N.; Campana, M.G.; Berry, L.; Faegre, S.; Derrickson, S.R.; Ha, R.R.; Dikow, R.B.; Rutz, C.; Fleischer, R.C. Population Genomics and Structure of the Critically Endangered Mariana Crow (Corvus kubaryi). Genes 2019, 10, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Luo, D.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Zhao, L.; Ludwig, A.; Peng, Z. Highly Resolved Phylogenetic Relationships within Order Acipenseriformes According to Novel Nuclear Markers. Genes 2019, 10, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Heppenheimer, E.; Brzeski, K.E.; Wooten, R.; Waddell, W.; Rutledge, L.Y.; Chamberlain, M.J.; Stahler, D.R.; Hinton, J.W.; VonHoldt, B.M. Rediscovery of Red Wolf Ghost Alleles in a Canid Population Along the American Gulf Coast. Genes 2018, 9, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Heppenheimer, E.; Harrigan, R.J.; Rutledge, L.Y.; Koepfli, K.-P.; DeCandia, A.L.; Brzeski, K.E.; Benson, J.F.; Wheeldon, T.; Patterson, B.R.; Kays, R. Population Genomic Analysis of North American Eastern Wolves (Canis lycaon) Supports Their Conservation Priority Status. Genes 2018, 9, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Mischler, C.; Veale, A.; Van Stijn, T.; Brauning, R.; McEwan, J.C.; Maloney, R.; Robertson, B.C. Population Connectivity and Traces of Mitochondrial Introgression in New Zealand Black-Billed Gulls (Larus bulleri). Genes 2018, 9, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Pinho, C.J.; Santos, B.; Mata, V.A.; Seguro, M.; Romeiras, M.M.; Lopes, R.J.; Vasconcelos, R. What Is the Giant Wall Gecko Having for Dinner? Conservation Genetics for Guiding Reserve Management in Cabo Verde. Genes 2018, 9, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Dang, Z.; McLenachan, P.A.; Lockhart, P.J.; Waipara, N.; Er, O.; Reynolds, C.; Blanchon, D. Metagenome Profiling Identifies Potential Biocontrol Agents for Selaginella kraussiana in New Zealand. Genes 2019, 10, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Adams, C.I.M.; Knapp, M.; Gemmell, N.J.; Jeunen, G.-J.; Bunce, M.; Lamare, M.D.; Taylor, H.R. Beyond Biodiversity: Can Environmental DNA (eDNA) Cut It as a Population Genetics Tool? Genes 2019, 10, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Novak, B.J. De-Extinction. Genes 2018, 9, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Russello, M.; Amato, G.; DeSalle, R.; Knapp, M. Conservation Genetics and Genomics. Genes 2020, 11, 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11030318

AMA Style

Russello M, Amato G, DeSalle R, Knapp M. Conservation Genetics and Genomics. Genes. 2020; 11(3):318. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11030318

Chicago/Turabian Style

Russello, Michael, George Amato, Robert DeSalle, and Michael Knapp. 2020. "Conservation Genetics and Genomics" Genes 11, no. 3: 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11030318

APA Style

Russello, M., Amato, G., DeSalle, R., & Knapp, M. (2020). Conservation Genetics and Genomics. Genes, 11(3), 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11030318

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop