Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Transcriptomic with UPLC-Q-Exactive MS Reveals Differences in Gene Expression and Components of Iridoid Biosynthesis in Various Parts of Gentiana macrophylla
Previous Article in Journal
Proteomic and Transcriptomic Landscapes of Alström and Bardet–Biedl Syndromes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification of bHLH Transcription Factor in Medicago sativa in Response to Cold Stress

College of Forest, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2022, 13(12), 2371; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122371
Submission received: 14 October 2022 / Revised: 21 November 2022 / Accepted: 6 December 2022 / Published: 15 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Alfalfa represents one of the most important legume forages, and it is also applied as an organic fertilizer to improve soil quality. However, this perennial plant is native to warmer temperate regions, and its valuable cold-acclimation-related regulatory mechanisms are still less known. In higher plants, the bHLH transcription factors play pleiotropic regulatory roles in response to abiotic stresses. The recently released whole genome sequencing data of alfalfa allowed us to identify 469 MsbHLHs by multi-step homolog search. Herein, we primarily identified 65 MsbHLH genes that significantly upregulated under cold stress, and such bHLHs were classified into six clades according to their expression patterns. Interestingly, the phylogenetic analysis and conserved motif screening of the cold-induced MsbHLHs showed that the expression pattern is relatively varied in each bHLH subfamily, this result indicating that the 65 MsbHLHs may be involved in a complex cold-responsive regulatory network. Hence, we analyzed the TFBSs at promoter regions that unraveled a relatively conserved TFBS distribution with genes exhibiting similar expression patterns. Eventually, to verify the core components involved in long-term cold acclimation, we examined transcriptome data from a freezing-tolerant species (cv. Zhaodong) in the field and compared the expression of cold-sensitive/tolerant subspecies of alfalfa, giving 11 bHLH as candidates, which could be important for further cold-tolerance enhancement and molecular breeding through genetic engineering in alfalfa.

1. Introduction

Low temperature is one of the major abiotic stresses that seriously affects the growth and development of plants, eventually damaging crop production and quality in many plant species [1,2]. Within the last 3 decades, global warming has led to large regional extreme temperature variations. In Europe and Asia, late-spring frosts were estimated to increase to ~35% and ~26%, respectively [3]. “Cold day” occurrences, with temperatures below a certain threshold value, have clearly increased [4]. In this scenario, understanding how plants respond to cold stress is important for further cold-stress-tolerance improvement in crops. Indeed, plants have evolved complex and diverse systems to improve their cold-stress resilience. For harsh cold habitats, signal perception is initiated by a cold-induced transient increase in cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations managed by Ca2+-permeable channels and detected by numerous receptor proteins that can recognize and interrupt these changes [5,6]. Further, the primary cold-stress signal modifies second messengers or other signal molecules, such as cyclic nucleotides (cAMP and cGMP), amino acids (glutamate and methionine), and various reactive oxygen species, which triggers transcription factors (TFs) to activate the cold-acclimation regulatory networks at the transcriptome level [7,8]. For long-term cold acclimation, plants shift from growth to dormant phases or change morphological characteristics to synchronize with climate rhythms [5,6].
The basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor family has been widely reported in plants, fungi, and animals with pleiotropic regulatory functions [9,10]. In plants, bHLH proteins have been reported to be involved in responses to various abiotic stresses, including drought, cold, salinity, and iron deficiency reviewed by [11,12]. Under low-temperature stress, the AtICE1/AtbHLH116 protein participates with the DREB1/CBF signaling pathway with affect transcription initiation of CBF by promoter region binding; simultaneously, overexpression of AtbHLH116 enhances cold tolerance [13,14]. Similar functions of ICE1/bHLH116 homologs have been observed in other plant species, such as Dimocarpus longan Lour, Pyrus ussuriensisa, Brassica campestris, and Zoysia japonica [15,16,17,18]. However, interspecific differences were still obtained, such that PuICE1 requires the interaction with PuHHP1 to further the transcriptional expression elevation of PuDREBα, and even the homolog in rice, OrbHLH001, is independent of the CBF/DREB1 cold-response pathway [16,19]. In addition to ICE1/bHLH116, other bHLH proteins including VaICE2, PtrbHLH, FtbHLH2, MdbHLH3, and Pavb1/18/28/60/61/65/66 are shown to be involved in cold-stress response [20,21,22,23].
Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L.) is one of the most important legume forages, improving soil quality and providing nitrogen as a fertilizer from symbiotic nitrogen fixation. However, significant economic losses result from “late-spring freezing” and other unusual sudden temperature changes that require practical improvement for cold acclimation [24]. To date, a number of TF families have been characterized in alfalfa, such as bZIP, MADS, WRKY, and DREB families [25,26,27,28]. However, the bHLH family has not been characterized, which is critical for further research on the cold-acclimation mechanism. Thus, we report basic information of MsbHLH by homolog search and identified cold-responsive bHLHs with cold-stress transcriptome data. Phylogenetic and conserved motif analyses were further processed. In addition, we analyzed the enrichment of TFBSs at the promoter region. Eventually, we examined the transcriptome data of a freezing-tolerant species (cv. Zhaodong) and unraveled 18 certain core MsbHLH genes that may be involved in cold/freezing acclimation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Flow Diagram of Genome-Wide Identification of MsbHLHs in M. sativa

An overview of the study’s workflow is shown in Figure 1. The stepwise identification processes include homolog searching and 2-time RNA-seq analysis (cold response and freezing acclimation). Genetic characterization was performed on 65 cold-responsive MsbHLHs. Details are provided below.

2.2. Multi-Step Homolog Search of bHLH Genes in Alfalfa

For comprehensive identification and analysis of bHLH gene family in alfalfa, sequences of putative bHLH genes were obtained from National Center for Biotechnological Information (NCBI, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) GenBank and the Arabidopsis International Resource (TAIR, https://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on 1 January 2020) via BLAST search. The draft genome data and annotation information of alfalfa cultivar “XinJiangDaYe” were downloaded from the figshare data repository (https://figshare.com/projects/whole_genome_sequencing_and_assembly_of_Medicago_sativa/66380, accessed on 1 January 2020). MsbHLH genes were first searched with TBtools “BLAST GUI Wrapper” [29] to obtain candidate bHLH family members. Second, the HMM (Hidden Markov Model) profile PF00010 (bHLH domain) was retrieved from the Pfam database (https://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/, accessed on 1 January 2020) to identify the putative MsbHLH genes from previous BLAST filtered candidates. Basic parameters including molecular weight (MW) and isoelectric point (pI) were predicted using the ProtParam tool (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 1 January 2020) [30].

2.3. Identification of Cold-Responsive MsbHLHs with RNA-Seq Data

The raw RNA sequencing data were obtained from NCBI Sequencing Read Archive (SRA, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra, accessed on 1 January 2020) through the SRA toolkits “prefetch” (version 2.8.0). Project “SRP144299” was downloaded for cold-stress analysis [31], “SRP060503” was used for cold-acclimation study [32], and “SRP055547” was used for cross-validation of the cold-acclimation-related result [33]. Raw data (raw reads) in “fastq” format were first qualified with FastQC program [34] for Q20, Q30, GC-content, and sequence duplication level; the data were then processed in Hisat2 version 2.2.1 [35] for read alignment to the alfalfa genome “XinJiangDaYe” [29]. The reads were subjected to fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (FPKM) conversion to obtain the expression value of genes and transcripts. In-house R scripts were used to analyze gene expression and generate heatmaps. Heatmap was generated using ggplot2, reshape2, gplots, and dplyr packages in R version 4.1.2 [36]. Source code in R and RNA-seq data were provided in Supplemental Data.

2.4. Phylogenetic, Gene Structure, and MEME Conserved Motif Analysis

With the aim to analyze the sequence features of cold-responsive bHLH genes in alfalfa, 170 bHLH proteins, including 105 from A. thaliana and 65 pre-selected MsbHLHs from M. sativa, were loaded on MEGAX version 10.2.6 (https://www.megasoftware.net, accessed on 22 March 2016) using default “ClustalW” parameters for alignment. The phylogenetic tree was then constructed with default “Neighbor-joining” algorithm parameters. Phylogenetic trees were then visualized by iTol (https://itol.embl.de/, accessed on 1 October 2020) [37]. Conserved motifs of MsbHLHs proteins were predicted using the MEME suite (version 5.4.1, https://meme-suite.org/meme/index.html, accessed on 25 August 2021) [38] with default parameters besides the “motifs should find”, which was set to 10. The coding sequences (CDS) and the structure of all genes were graphically displayed with TBtools function “Gene Structure View”. Gene structure info from “GFF” file containing the predicted gene structure annotation was obtained from “figshare.com, accessed on 17 January 2012” described above.

2.5. Putative TFBSs Analysis in the Promoter Regions of MsbHLH Genes

Identification of transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) is important for understanding the function of TFs and their interactions with TF-TFBS pairs. TFBSs were analyzed to determine the transcription levels of their downstream genes. A total of 2 kb of upstream sequence from starting codon was analyzed for each bHLH gene by PlantPAN 3.0 webserver “multiple promoter analysis” tool (http://plantpan.itps.ncku.edu.tw/promoter_multiple.php, accessed on 17 January 2012) [39]. Source code in R and TFBS data from PlantPAN3.0 were provided in Supplemental Data.

3. Results

3.1. Genome-Wide Identification of MsbHLH Genes in M. sativa

To identify the MsbHLH genes in alfalfa, a local BLAST program was performed through TBtools with the cultivar “XinJiangDaYe” genome sequence [31], and a homolog search with 105 putative Arabidopsis bHLH genes together with conserved domain HMM screening using PF00010 (bHLH domain) identified a total of 469 bHLH candidates. These MsbHLH genes range from 92 to 1396 amino acids (average/median 333/309 aa). The predicted molecular weights (Mw) of the MsbHLH proteins ranged from 10.35 kDa to 159.5 kDa, and the isoelectric points (pI) ranged from 4.44 to 11.31 (Supplementary Table S1).

3.2. Identification of 65 Cold-Stress-Induced MsbHLHs with Transcriptomic Data

The bHLH family is one of the most extensively researched superfamilies that participates in pleiotropic regulatory roles in response to abiotic stresses, such as drought, cold, heat, and salinity stresses, and the size of this family is the second largest in plants [reviewed by 11–13]. Thus, with the aim to identify the cold-responsive components from a total of 465 MsbHLHs, a publicly available RNA-seq dataset obtained from NCBI related to time-series (0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h) cold-stress treatment (4 °C) of alfalfa variety Zhongmu No.1 was analyzed [31]. The expression level of these genes was presented in a heatmap (Figure 2). With the threshold of “FPKM > 0.1”, “log2 fold change > 1”, and “p-value < 0.05” to filter the cold-induced MsbHLH genes, 65 out of 469 MsbHLHs were identified and clustered into six clades (Figure 2), which consist of 12 (Clade 1), 18 (Clade 2), 11 (Clade 3), 9 (Clade 4), 12 (Clade 5), and 3 (Clade 6) genes, respectively. In general, genes in Clades 1, 2, 5, and 6 were induced by short-term (less than 24 h) cold stress while genes in Clades 3 and 4 were induced by a relatively longer (more than 1 day) cold stress (Figure 2).

3.3. Phylogenetic, Gene Structure, MEME Motifs of 65 Cold Responsive MsbHLHs

To explore the distribution and structural diversification of conserved motifs of MsbHLH proteins, we analyzed the conserved domains of MsbHLHs by the MEME (Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation) online tool (Figure 3). With only modifying the default setting of “motif numbers” from 3 to 10, we observed that none of the 65 MsbHLHs contain all 10 motifs while sharing the conserved bHLH domain (motif 2, yellow). The motif diversity was relatively conserved in each subfamily (Figure 3A). In addition to motif 2, motifs 4, 6, 8, 9, and 10 were less observed while motif 1 was almost characterized in all genes except “Ms.gene055887.t1” and “Ms.gene63249.t1”. Gene structure analysis showed that the number of exons in MsbHLH genes varied from 1 to 18 (Figure 3B). “Ms.gene035172.t1” contains the relatively highest number of 18 exons and has the largest intron regions. Furthermore, we integrated the phylogenetic and transcriptomic results to facilitate insight into the potential functional diversity of MsbHLH genes (Figure 4). In the current study, 65 MsbHLH genes were previously clustered into six clades according to their cold response gene expression level (Figure 2). However, clustered genes were relatively grouped separately with phylogenetic analysis according to their protein sequences; for example, genes in Clade 1 were mostly grouped at the lower part while those in Clade 2 were grouped at the upper part in this circle phylogenetic tree (Figure 4).

3.4. TFBS Analysis of Cold-Responsive MsbHLH Genes

With the aim to further unravel the potential regulatory mechanism of MsbHLH genes in the complex cold-related networks, the promoter region (−1 to −2000) of each MsbHLH was uploaded to the PlantPAN webserver [38]. In total, more than 600 TFBSs were characterized at the promoter region. To statistically investigate whether there were differences in TFBS composition, we initially established a baseline of TFBS, which is dissimilar to the TFBS studies in other studies that only calculate differentially enriched TFBS above a certain number [40,41,42]. In the current study, the TFBS composition of each gene was divided by baseline data and then followed with log2-fold change calculation, and the final statistical results were clustered by “heatmap.2” from “gplot” in R (Figure 5). Obviously, genes showing similar expression patterns were clustered together, such as Clades 2 and 5, Clades 1 and 6, and Clades 3 and 4 (Figure 5), respectively. This result indicates a relatively highly conserved TFBS that regulates gene expression in response to cold stress. To more intuitively explore the promoter regions, we analyzed the top significantly differentially enriched TFBS of each clade, which gives a total of 59 TFBSs belonging to 15 families (Supplementary Table S2), including TFBS binding to the TF family of AP2, TCP, bZIP, MADS box, MYB.

3.5. Transcriptome Analysis of 65 Cold-Responsive MsbHLHs Identified 18 Genes Related to Overwinter Cold Acclimation in M. sativa cv. Zhaodong

M. sativa cv. Zhaodong is a major forage legume cultivar that can survive in northern China, where temperatures may reach around −30 °C in winter. Song et al. (2016) provided a systemic analysis of adaptive mechanisms for frost tolerance using RNA-seq [32]. M. sativa cv. Zhaodong was cultivated in September and harvested in mid-winter after freezing adaptation during a two-month temperature decrease. In this adaptation process, the antioxidant defense system was believed to confer freezing tolerance in a rapid way, and numerous potential freezing-sensing and signal transduction components were revealed. Based on the transcriptome data, we identified 18 MsbHLHs that contribute to long-term (much longer than 1-day cold stress) cold adaptation and alfalfa survival throughout the winter (Figure 6). Interestingly, these upregulated genes are not mainly distributing in specific clades while almost grouped separately. This finding suggests that a complex regulatory network is consistent with the development of cold tolerance.

3.6. Expression Difference between M. sativa Subspecies during Plant Development

To cross−validate the previously identified cold-responsive MsbHLH genes, a de novo transcriptome data assembly from six different tissues of two alfalfa subspecies (M. sativa ssp. sativa from the Middle East and M. sativa ssp. falcata from colder Central Asia) was examined. In this study, we comprehensively examined the expression level of 18 MsbHLHs in specific tissues including root, leaf, flower, elongation stem internode, post-elongation stem internode, and nitrogen-fixing nodule (Figure 7). These results clearly indicate a distinct and ecosystem-dependent expression pattern of 11 MsbHLHs between falcata and sativa. Genes 96814, 74305, 69938, 54951, 31079, 09877, and 006766 have significantly lower expression levels in cold-tolerant falcata across all six tissues. Genes 60418, 46828, 49862, and 035172 have higher expression levels in more than half of tissues (Figure 7). Thus, we would like to suggest that the 11 MsbHLHs would be interesting molecular targets for further cold-stress improvement in alfalfa.

4. Discussion

The bHLH family, which has emerged as the second-largest (less than MYB family) TF family in plants, is essential for regulating plant growth in response to environmental stresses [43]. Although the bHLH family has been studied in many plants, relatively little information is available regarding alfalfa bHLH genes. In the current study, we identified 469 genes encoding bHLH transcription factors that had analogous structural characteristics to those in Arabidopsis and contain the bHLH domain in the recently released alfalfa genome [29]. Freezing temperatures are a major factor affecting alfalfa development and reducing production and survival, particularly in China’s high-altitude and northern locations [32]. Meanwhile, bHLH transcription factor plays varied significant regulatory role for plant growth and development as well as tolerance to abiotic stresses including drought, salt, and low temperature [44]. To focus the cold-responsive components, we primarily analyzed MsbHLH genes with cold stress RNA-seq data that give 65 cold-induced MsbHLHs (log2-fold change > 1, p-value < 0.05, and FPKM > 0.1) (Figure 2). In general, variation in gene family members’ expression profiles could be a reflection of the inherent variety of functions [45]. In addition, we found that 65 MsbHLHs were clustered into six clades based to their expression patterns (Figure 2), indicating that distinct clades may engage in the cold-stress response at different stages. Indeed, cold response includes perception, signal transduction, and the regulation of gene expression. Short-term cold stress resulted in rapid and transient increases in PLD/PA, proline, and reaction oxygen species (ROS) in leaves, but these small signal molecules were reduced after long-term cold stress. Interestingly, the opposite result of proline synthesis and ROS signals was observed in the roots [46]. Similar results have been observed in 47 cold-responsive OfbHLHs (osmanthus fragrans) that show various expression patterns with a range of 0.5 (short) to 120 (long) h cold stress [47]. To date, the mechanism of how these small molecules interact and/or coordinate to bHLH-related signal transduction pathways is little known [48]. Thus, more specific and in-depth experiments with the bHLH family still need to proceed.
Analysis of gene structures provides important information on phylogenetic relationships. In Figure 3, we observed that the number of exons and conserved motif diversification shows less variation in bHLH subfamilies while the number of exons in MsbHLHs ranged from 1 to 18, and similar results have also been obtained in conservative motif arrangements in which gene motifs are consistent within subfamilies but varied ranging from 1 to 7. This indicates loss or insertion during the evolution of M. sativa. In general, genes with the same functions were clustered into the same subfamily. However, the phylogenetic tree and RNA-seq data integration show that there are some relatively diverse expression differences of MsbHLH within subfamilies (Figure 4). This is similar to OfbHLHs, which have genes with high sequence similarity showing similar expression patterns in response to short/long terms of cold stress but contain several outliers, such as OfbHLH117/120 in subfamily IIIB, and only OfbHLH194 was downregulated at 0.5 h in this family [46]. We made the assumption that genes in each subfamily generally perform comparable biological functions while being activated or controlled by various upstream transcription factors, which causes the genes to engage in various stages of cold response. In this scenario, we further analyzed the transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) of the promoter region (−1 to −2000 bp) of 65 MsbHLH genes.
The TFBSs in the promoter regions regulate gene expression. In this study, we generated the TFBS frequency matrix based on the number of predicted TFBSs in the promoter region of 65 MsbHLH genes. In general, genes showing similar expression patterns were grouped, such as Clades 2 and 5, Clades 1 and 6, and Clades 3 and 4 (Figure 5). However, these TFBSs are differentially enriched between different groups (Supplementary Table S2). For instance, the AP2/ERF family was mostly enriched in Clade 1, 2, 5, and 6, in which genes were induced by short-term cold stress that may lead to a rapid response, and DREB genes belonging to the AP2/ERF family are importantly involved in short-term cold-stress response and further cold acclimation [reviewed by 8]. In addition, TFBSs belonging to other families, such as TCP, MYB, HSF, play an important role during plant growth and are involved in stress response. The composition differences among 65 MsbHLHs indicate that the regulation of genes that caused the following stepwise gene regulation is well-established. However, the underpinning mechanisms of how the cold-stress signal was transduced from primary ROS Ca2+ sensors to bHLH and even to downstream genes are still little known.
Over the past two decades, numerous proteins in the bHLH family have been identified as being intricate in the tolerance to low-temperature stress [reviewed by 11–13]; for example, ICE1, a typical MYC-type bHLH transcription factor, can regulate cold-responsive signal transduction [49,50]. Simultaneously, ICE1 positively regulates CBFs expression and freezing tolerance by directly binding to the CBF3 promoter region [14]. We previously characterized 65 MsbHLHs that may be involved in short-term cold stress sensing or signal transduction. However, as an important perennial forage, overwinter cold-tolerance formation is essential for alfalfa to avoid or decrease devastating freezing damage [51]. In northern China, M. sativa cv. Zhaodong is a native cold-tolerant species that can survive temperatures as low as −30 °C, and the overwinter rate is more than 90% [51]. Thus, a long-term transcriptome analysis of adaptive mechanisms for frost tolerance of cv. Zhaodong was investigated [32]. Here, we focused on the expression pattern of 65 previously identified cold-tolerance-related MsbHLHs (Figure 6). The result indicates that 18 MsbHLHs were induced in winter and these genes may participate both in short- (1 h to 48 h, 4 °C) and long-term (3 months, maximum to −30 °C freezing) low-temperature response. Moreover, the cross-validated RNA-seq result of cold-sensitive/tolerant M. sativa subspecies unraveled 11 out of 18 MsbHLHs, grouped with seven showing lower expression level in falcata (cold tolerance) and four in sativa (cold sensitive) [33]. In addition, these genes may provide promising molecular targets for the improvement of cold tolerance in alfalfa (Figure 6 and Figure 7).

5. Conclusions

In this study, we have genome-widely identified 469 putative MsbHLH genes using recently released whole-genome sequence datasets, characterized in detail by their genetic lineage and gene structures as well as coding proteins that consist of a conserved bHLH domain. In particular, 65 out of 469 differentially expressed MsbHLHs were characterized as potential cold-stress-responsive components, which may serve as crucial trans-activators participating in or controlling a signal transduction network(s) regulating growth adaption to cold stress. Moreover, 11 MsbHLHs were cross-validated as genes involved in long-term tolerance to freezing environments, and these MsbHLH were differentially expressed in cold-sensitive/tolerant M. sativa subspecies and also significantly accumulated after long-term freezing treatment. In future studies, it may be interesting and necessary to functionally appreciate such MsbHLH genes at molecular and physiological levels. Thus, we believe that our findings with adding many new members to the bHLH family in alfalfa should provide valuable information for further profoundly understanding bHLHs’ action in plant cold-stress behavior, assisting us in taking a proper approach toward aiming at improving crop cold tolerance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13122371/s1, Table S1: pI and MW of 465 MsbHLH genes. Table S2: Top 10 significantly differentially enriched TFBSs at the promoter region of cold-induced MsbHLH genes. Source code, RNA-seq data, TFBS data were provided in Supplementary Data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.; data collection; S.S., G.L. and L.J.; formal analysis, S.S. and G.L.; methodology, G.L. and L.J.; supervision, S.S.; visualization, S.S.; software, G.L.; writing—original draft, G.L. and L.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by “General items of Hunan Provincial Department of Education” grant number Project No.20C0623.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

RNA-seq data obtained in this study are available in NCBI, and others are presented in this study and its Supplementary Materials. The source code is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Lin Li for the help offered with the present paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhu, J. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell 2016, 167, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Boyer, J.S. Plant productivity and environment. Science 1982, 282, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zohner, C.M.; Mo, L.; Renner, S.S.; Svenning, J.C.; Vitasse, Y.; Benito, B.M.; Ordonez, A.; Baumgarten, F.; Bastin, J.; Sebald, V.; et al. Late-spring frost risk between 1959 and 2017 decreased in North America but increased in Europe and Asia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 12192–12200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Park, T.W.; Ho, C.H.; Jeong, S.J.; Choi, Y.S.; Park, S.K.; Song, C.K. Different characteristics of cold day and cold surge frequency over East Asia in a global warming situation. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2011, 116, D12118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Quint, M.; Delker, C.; Franklin, K.A.; Wigge, P.; Halliday, K.J.; Zanten, M.V. Molecular and genetic control of plant thermomorphogenesis. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 15190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Aslam, M.; Fakher, B.; Ashraf, M.A.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, B.; Qin, Y. Plant low-temperature stress: Signaling and response. Agronomy 2022, 12, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gong, Z.; Xiong, L.; Shi, H.; Yang, S.; Herrera-Estrella, L.R.; Xu, G.; Chao, D.Y.; Li, J.; Wang, P.Y.; Qin, F.; et al. Plant abiotic stress response and nutrient use efficiency. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020, 63, 635–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ding, Y.; Shi, Y.; Yang, S. Molecular regulation of plant responses to environmental temperatures. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 544–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Riechmann, L.; Muyldermans, S. Single domain antibodies: Comparison of camel VH and camelised human VH domains. J. Immunol. Methods 1999, 231, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Carretero-Paulet, L.; Galstyan, A.; Roig-Villanova, I.; Martinez-Garcia, J.F.; Bilbao-Castro, J.R.; Robertson, D.L. Genome-wide classification and evolutionary analysis of the bHLH family of transcription factors in Arabidopsis, poplar, rice, moss, and algae. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 1398–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guo, J.; Sun, B.; He, H.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, H.; Wang, B. Current understanding of bHLH transcription factors in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Qian, Y.; Zhang, T.; Yu, Y.; Gou, L.; Yang, J.; Xu, J.; Pi, E. Regulatory mechanisms of bHLH transcription factors in plant adaptive responses to various abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 677611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Man, L.L.; Xiang, D.J.; Wang, L.N.; Zhang, W.W.; Wang, X.D.; Qi, G.C. Stress-responsive gene RsICE1 from Raphanus sativus increases cold tolerance in rice. Protoplasma 2017, 254, 945–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chinnusamy, V.; Ohta, M.; Kanrar, S.; Lee, B.H.; Hong, X.; Agarwal, M. ICE1: A regulator of cold-induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 1043–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Yang, X.; Wang, R.; Hu, Q.; Li, S.; Mao, X.; Jing, H. DlICE1, a stress-responsive gene from Dimocarpus longan, enhances cold tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 142, 490–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, X.; Li, K.; Jin, C.; Zhang, S. ICE1 of Pyrus ussuriensis functions in cold tolerance by enhancing PuDREBa transcriptional levels through interacting with PuHHP1. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zhang, T.; Mo, J.; Zhou, K.; Chang, Y.; Liu, Z. Overexpression of Brassica campestris BcICE1 gene increases abiotic stress tolerance in tobacco. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 132, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zuo, Z.F.; Kang, H.G.; Park, M.Y.; Jeong, H.; Sun, H.J.; Song, P.S. Zoysia japonica MYC type transcription factor ZjICE1 regulates cold tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2019, 289, 110254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, F.; Guo, S.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, D.; Chong, K.; Xu, Y. Overexpression of a homopeptide repeat-containing bHLH protein gene (OrbHLH001) from Dongxiang Wild Rice confers freezing and salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2010, 29, 977–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, W.; Jiao, Y.; Li, R.; Zhang, N.; Xiao, D.; Ding, X.; Wang, Z. Chinese wild-growing Vitis amurensis ICE1 and ICE2 encode MYC-type bHLH transcription activators that regulate cold tolerance in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Geng, J.; Wei, T.; Wang, Y.; Huang, X.; Liu, J.H. Overexpression of PtrbHLH, a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor from Poncirus trifoliata, confers enhanced cold tolerance in pummelo (Citrus grandis) by modulation of H2O2 level via regulating a CAT gene. Tree Physiol. 2019, 39, 2045–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Feng, X.M.; Zhao, Q.; Zhao, L.L.; Qiao, Y.; Xie, X.B.; Li, H.F.; Yao, Y.X.; You, C.X.; Hao, Y.J. The cold-induced basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor gene MdCIbHLH1 encodes an ICE-like protein in apple. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Yao, P.; Sun, Z.; Li, C.; Zhao, X.; Li, M.; Deng, R.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Chen, H.; Wu, Q. Overexpression of Fagopyrum tataricum FtbHLH2 enhances tolerance to cold stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 125, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chamberlain, C.J.; Cook, B.I.; García De Cortázar-Atauri, I.; Wolkovich, E.M. Rethinking false spring risk. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2019, 25, 2209–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Liu, S.; Qin, B.; Fang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Du, C.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Genome-wide identification, phylogeny and expression analysis of the bZIP gene family in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2021, 35, 905–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dong, X.; Deng, H.; Ma, W.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, Z. Genome-wide identification of the MADS-box transcription factor family in autotetraploid cultivated alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and expression analysis under abiotic stress. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mao, P.; Jin, X.; Bao, Q.; Mei, X.; Zhou, Q.; Min, X.; Liu, Z. WRKY transcription factors in Medicago sativa L.: Genome-wide identification and expression analysis under abiotic stress. DNA Cell Biol. 2020, 39, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sheng, S.; Guo, X.; Wu, C.; Xiang, Y.; Duan, S.; Yang, W.; Li, W.; Cao, F.; Liu, L. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of DREB genes in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) in response to cold stress. Plant Signal. Behav. 2022, 17, e2081420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, H.; Zeng, Y.; Yang, Y.; Huang, L.; Tang, B.; Zhang, H.; Hao, F.; Liu, W.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; et al. Allele-aware chromosome-level genome assembly and efficient transgene-free genome editing for the autotetraploid cultivated alfalfa. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wilkins, M.R.; Gasteiger, E.; Bairoch, A.; Sanchez, J.C.; Williams, K.L.; Appel, R.D.; Hochstrasser, D.F. Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server. Methods Mol. Biol. 1999, 112, 531–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou, Q.; Luo, D.; Chai, X.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Nan, Z.; Yang, Q.; Liu, W.; Liu, Z. Multiple regulatory networks are activated during cold stress in Medicago sativa L. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Song, L.L.; Jiang, L.; Chen, Y.; Shu, Y.; Bai, Y.; Guo, C. Deep-sequencing transcriptome analysis of field-grown Medicago sativa L. crown buds acclimated to freezing stress. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2016, 16, 495–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rourke, J.; Fu, F.; Bucciarelli, B.; Yang, S.; Samac, D.; Lamb, J.; Monteros, M.; Graham, M.; Gronwald, J.; Krom, N.; et al. The Medicago sativa gene index 1.2: A web-accessible gene expression atlas for investigating expression differences between Medicago sativa subspecies. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 502. [Google Scholar]
  34. Andrews, S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High throughput Sequence Data. B. Bioinformatics. 2010. Available online: www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (accessed on 4 October 2010).
  35. Kim, D.; Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. HISAT: A fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2013; Volume 14, pp. 12–21. Available online: http://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 3 September 2013).
  37. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: An online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W242–W245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bailey, T.L.; Johnson, J.; Grant, C.E.; Noble, W.S. The MEME Suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W39–W49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Chow, C.; Lee, T.; Hung, Y.; Li, G.; Tseng, K.; Liu, Y.; Kuo, P.; Zheng, H.; Chang, W. PlantPAN3.0: A new and updated resource for reconstructing transcriptional regulatory networks from ChIP-seq experiments in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D1155–D1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kurbidaeva, A.; Ezhova, T.; Novokreshchenova, M. Arabidopsis thaliana ICE2 gene: Phylogeny, structural evolution and functional diversification from ICE1. Plant Sci. 2014, 229, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, Y.; Shan, X.; Jiang, Z.; Zhao, L.; Jin, F. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the GA2ox gene family in maize (Zea mays L.) under various abiotic stress conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 166, 621–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Han, Y.; Hou, Z.; He, Q.; Zhang, X.; Yan, K.; Han, R.; Liang, Z. Genome-Wide Characterization and Expression Analysis of bZIP Gene Family Under Abiotic Stress in Glycyrrhiza uralensis. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 754237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Feller, A.; Machemer, K.; Braun, E.L.; Grotewold, E. Evolutionary and comparative analysis of MYB and bHLH plant transcription factors. Plant J. 2011, 66, 94–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hao, Y. Basic Helix-Loop-Helix (bHLH) transcription factors regulate a wide range of functions in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhao, Y.; Zhou, M.; Xu, K.; Li, J. Integrated transcriptomics and metabolomics analyses provide insights into cold stress response in wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 12, 752474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Margutti, M.P.; Reyna, M.; Meringer, M.V.; Racagni, G.E.; Villasuso, A.L. Lipid signaling mediated by PLD/PA modulates proline and H2O2 levels in barley seedlings exposed to short- and long-term chilling stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 113, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Fan, Y.; Li, L.; Ding, W.; Li, H.; Shi, T.; Yang, X.; Wang, L.; Yue, Y. Genome-wide identification of Osmanthus fragrans bHLH transcription factors and their expression analysis in response to abiotic stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 172, 103990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zheng, S.; Su, M.; Wang, L.; Zhang, T.; Wang, J.; Xie, H.; Wu, X.; Haq, S.I.U.; Qiu, Q. Small signaling molecules in plant response to cold stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 266, 153534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kashyap, P.; Deswal, R. Two ICE isoforms showing differential transcriptional regulation by cold and hormones participate in Brassica juncea cold stress signaling. Gene 2019, 695, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hwarari, D.; Guan, Y.; Ahmad, B. ICE-CBF-COR Signaling Cascade and its regulation in plants responding to cold stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hui, Y.; Yao, J.; Liu, R.; Cui, G.; Hou, S. Comprehensive evaluation on forage yield, nutrition quality and winter surviving rate of different alfalfa varieties. Chin. J. Grassl. 2010, 32, 108–111. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Flow diagram of genome-wide identification of bHLHs in M. sativa. The dashed lines represent the identifying procedures that incrementally eliminate the potential genes involved in both cold acclimatization and cold response.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of genome-wide identification of bHLHs in M. sativa. The dashed lines represent the identifying procedures that incrementally eliminate the potential genes involved in both cold acclimatization and cold response.
Genes 13 02371 g001
Figure 2. Clustering−approach−based heatmap of MsbHLH genes. The heatmap represents the expression pattern of genes in response to cold stress. Relative expression levels were calculated as a Log2-fold change against CK (see Section Materials and Methods). The red color shows an upregulation of a given gene, and the green indicates a downregulation. Labeled number in each tile is the expression level “FPKM”.
Figure 2. Clustering−approach−based heatmap of MsbHLH genes. The heatmap represents the expression pattern of genes in response to cold stress. Relative expression levels were calculated as a Log2-fold change against CK (see Section Materials and Methods). The red color shows an upregulation of a given gene, and the green indicates a downregulation. Labeled number in each tile is the expression level “FPKM”.
Genes 13 02371 g002
Figure 3. Analysis of the conserved motifs (A) and gene structure (B) of 65 cold-stress-responsive MsbHLHs.
Figure 3. Analysis of the conserved motifs (A) and gene structure (B) of 65 cold-stress-responsive MsbHLHs.
Genes 13 02371 g003
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of bHLH proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana and Medicago sativa L. Evolutionary relationships were constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method (see Section Materials and Methods). The shaded color indicates the genes from different clades that are grouped by gene expression pattern under cold stress.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of bHLH proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana and Medicago sativa L. Evolutionary relationships were constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method (see Section Materials and Methods). The shaded color indicates the genes from different clades that are grouped by gene expression pattern under cold stress.
Genes 13 02371 g004
Figure 5. Promoter analysis of 65 cold-stress-responsive MsbHLH genes by PlantPAN. TFBSs of 65 cold-stress-responsive MsbHLHs of the −2000 bp 5′ upstream regions are statistically analyzed. The ratio of each TFBS was divided with the baseline ratio, and then the heatmap was generated by heatmap.2 from Gplots in R. Clades 1–6 are related to the gene expression patterns of MsbHLHs shown in Figure 2.
Figure 5. Promoter analysis of 65 cold-stress-responsive MsbHLH genes by PlantPAN. TFBSs of 65 cold-stress-responsive MsbHLHs of the −2000 bp 5′ upstream regions are statistically analyzed. The ratio of each TFBS was divided with the baseline ratio, and then the heatmap was generated by heatmap.2 from Gplots in R. Clades 1–6 are related to the gene expression patterns of MsbHLHs shown in Figure 2.
Genes 13 02371 g005
Figure 6. Clustering-approach-based heatmap of MsbHLH genes in freezing acclimation alfalfa. Red point represents the significantly upregulated MsbHLH genes. The red color shows an upregulation of a given gene, and the green indicates a downregulation. Labeled number in each tile is the expression level “FPKM”.
Figure 6. Clustering-approach-based heatmap of MsbHLH genes in freezing acclimation alfalfa. Red point represents the significantly upregulated MsbHLH genes. The red color shows an upregulation of a given gene, and the green indicates a downregulation. Labeled number in each tile is the expression level “FPKM”.
Genes 13 02371 g006
Figure 7. The expression level of MsbHLH genes in different tissues of sensitive (M. sativa spp. falcata) and tolerant (M. sativa spp. Sativa) cultivars. Relative expression levels were calculated as a Log2−fold change against CK (see Section Materials and Methods). The red color shows an upregulation of a given gene, and the green indicates a downregulation. Labeled number in each tile is the expression level “FPKM”.
Figure 7. The expression level of MsbHLH genes in different tissues of sensitive (M. sativa spp. falcata) and tolerant (M. sativa spp. Sativa) cultivars. Relative expression levels were calculated as a Log2−fold change against CK (see Section Materials and Methods). The red color shows an upregulation of a given gene, and the green indicates a downregulation. Labeled number in each tile is the expression level “FPKM”.
Genes 13 02371 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, G.; Jin, L.; Sheng, S. Genome-Wide Identification of bHLH Transcription Factor in Medicago sativa in Response to Cold Stress. Genes 2022, 13, 2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122371

AMA Style

Li G, Jin L, Sheng S. Genome-Wide Identification of bHLH Transcription Factor in Medicago sativa in Response to Cold Stress. Genes. 2022; 13(12):2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122371

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Guangjun, Lei Jin, and Song Sheng. 2022. "Genome-Wide Identification of bHLH Transcription Factor in Medicago sativa in Response to Cold Stress" Genes 13, no. 12: 2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122371

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop