Next Article in Journal
vwa1 Knockout in Zebrafish Causes Abnormal Craniofacial Chondrogenesis by Regulating FGF Pathway
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetic Diversity of Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum L. ssp. durum, Desf) Germplasm as Revealed by Morphological and SSR Markers
Previous Article in Journal
Prenatal Environmental Stressors and DNA Methylation Levels in Placenta and Peripheral Tissues of Mothers and Neonates Evaluated by Applying Artificial Neural Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Grain Hardness in Common Wheat
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 14
Issue 4
10.3390/genes14040837
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Genetic Improvement of Wheat with Pre-Harvest Sprouting Resistance in China

by
Cheng Chang
*,
Haiping Zhang
,
Jie Lu
,
Hongqi Si
and
Chuanxi Ma
Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on Southern Yellow and Huai River Valley, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(4), 837; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14040837
Submission received: 23 February 2023 / Revised: 22 March 2023 / Accepted: 27 March 2023 / Published: 30 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics Studies on Wheat)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Wheat pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) refers to the germination of seeds directly on the spike due to rainy weather before harvest, which often results in yield reduction, quality deterioration, and seed value loss. In this study, we reviewed the research progress in the quantitative trait loci (QTL) detection and gene excavation related to PHS resistance in wheat. Simultaneously, the identification and creation of germplasm resources and the breeding of wheat with PHS resistance were expounded in this study. Furthermore, we also discussed the prospect of molecular breeding during genetic improvement of PHS-resistant wheat.

1. Introduction

Wheat is one of the major food crops worldwide, accounting for 20% of humans’ total calories and protein intake, and feeds nearly 40% of the global population. A stable increase in wheat yield per unit and total yield is essential to cope with the increasing demand of feeding the population and is important for ensuring wheat production safety [1,2]. Pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) in wheat is a climatic disaster, which refers to seeds directly sprouting on the spike because of rainfall before harvest. PHS often occurs in China, the United States of America, the European Union, Canada, Australia, Japan, and other countries, resulting in a minimum loss of 1 billion U.S. dollar globally every year [3,4]. Because of the hydrolysis of endosperm storage materials (such as starch and protein), the 1000-grain weight and bulk weight of germinated seeds decrease, resulting in yield reduction. Furthermore, when the activity of α-amylase in germinated grains increases, the end-use quality of wheat deteriorates because of starch and protein decreases [3,5,6,7]. At the same time, the seedling quality is negatively affected because of the decreased seed vigor [5,7]. Therefore, PHS is one of the climatic disasters affecting the safety of wheat production worldwide and has been studied by the major wheat-producing countries [7,8].
PHS in wheat is a complex trait that is affected by internal factors such as seed dormancy level, seed coat color, ear and glume characteristics, and seed development stage, as well as external factors such as weather [9,10,11]. It is generally believed that red-grained wheat has higher PHS resistance than white-grained wheat; however, the latter has better grinding qualities (such as high flour yield and favorable color); therefore, it is often favored by producers and consumers [7,12]. Because the resistance of modern white-grained varieties toward PHS is generally weak, they are more seriously affected by PHS than red-grained varieties [5]. Seed dormancy is the main genetic component for PHS resistance and determines the resistance level of wheat. Therefore, the genetic regulation mechanism of seed dormancy is often taken as the main content when studying the mechanism of PHS resistance in previous reports. Many studies have found that PHS resistance/seed dormancy is controlled by multiple genes, which are distributed across 21 chromosomes of wheat [13,14,15,16,17]. Therefore, the leading approaches and strategies to combat the risk of PHS involve breeding and applying the PHS-resistant wheat variety. Therefore, excavating and identifying the important genes/loci, transferring, and pyramiding or editing major genes will be the main area of research in molecular breeding for improving PHS resistance.

2. The Quantitative Trait Loci for PHS Resistance

PHS resistance in wheat is a complex trait controlled by multiple genes, where seed dormancy is the main genetic component [13,14,15,16,17]. Previous studies have mainly used two methods to excavate and identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for this trait. One method is linkage analysis based on biparental populations such as recombinant inbred line (RIL), double haploid (DH), backcross, backcross inbred line (BIL), near-isogenic line (NIL), and F2, whereas the other method is whole-genome association analysis based on a panel of varieties. Therefore, many QTLs for PHS resistance have been identified through different methods, which are widely distributed across 21 chromosomes [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. With the development and application of molecular marker identification techniques, such as SNP chip (90 k, 660 k, etc.), more and more gene loci of PHS resistance/seed dormancy have been identified, providing more effective markers for marker-assisted selection during genetic improvement of PHS resistance [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Owing to the limitations of the methods, many identified QTLs are material specific and not reproducible in different studies; therefore, they have certain limitations in marker-assisted selection during wheat breeding for PHS resistance. Based on both the previous studies and our own research, we found that the QTLs located on chromosomes 3 and 4 played a significant role in PHS resistance. This was especially the case for the QTLs on chromosomes 3A and 4A (Table 1), which showed good stability in multiple environments. These loci of PHS resistance are important for gene cloning and marker-assisted breeding.

3. The Regulation Genes for PHS Resistance

The exploration and identification of genes is the basis of studying the molecular regulation mechanism of PHS resistance in wheat. To date, only a few functional genes have been identified for PHS resistance. So far, seven genes have been isolated through homologous cloning and mapping cloning: TaVp-1 [38,39,40,41,42], TaDOG1L1 [43], TaMFT/TaPHS1 [8,44], TaSdr [45], TaMKK3 [46], TaQsd1/TaAlaAT [47], and Myb10-D [6] (Table 2). These genes mainly participate in the regulation of seed dormancy by affecting the ABA/GA synthesis/metabolism/signaling pathways, thereby affecting PHS resistance. This indicates that ABA/GA is a key factor involved in the regulation of seed dormancy/PHS resistance. The application of these genes is different in molecular breeding for PHS resistance. At present, TaVp-1, TaMFT/TaPHS1 and Myb10-D are widely used in wheat PHS resistance breeding. However, with the deepening of molecular genetics research on PHS resistance, more and more candidate genes have been excavated and verified, and these will provide more gene resources for wheat PHS resistance breeding.
In our study, along with the methods of homologous cloning and mapping cloning, some candidate genes involved in the regulation of PHS resistance in wheat were also excavated using bioinformatics and transcriptomic tools. These genes include TaGASR34 gene (Gibberellic Acid-Stimulated Regulator gene family), TaC3H4/18/37/51/72 genes (C3H zinc finger transcription factors gene family), TaGATA17/25/34/37/40/46/51/72/73 genes (GATA transcription factors gene family), TaVQ genes (valine–glutamine proteins), TaIQD/4/28/32/58/64/69/71 genes (IQ67 Domain gene family), TaCDPK21 (calcium signaling pathway gene) and TaCPK40 (calcium-dependent protein kinases gene) [50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. The roles and functions of these candidate genes in PHS resistance and their breeding value should be studied in the future.

4. Germplasm Resources of PHS-Resistant Wheat in China

Pre-harvest sprouting of wheat often occurs in the southwest winter wheat region (including Sichuan, Yunnan, Hunan, Hubei, and Guizhou, etc.), the middle and lower Yangtze River winter wheat region, and the north and northeast spring wheat regions in China. Due to long-term mechanisms of natural and artificial selection, there are many germplasm resources with PHS resistance in these areas. Some of the varieties with high PHS resistance in the southwest winter wheat region include Wanxianbaimaizi, Yongchuanbaimaizi, Suiningtuotuomai, Fulingxuxumai, Baikezao 2, Chuanmai 11, Mianyang 115, Chuanyu 2179, Guimai 2, and Mian 84-43. The PHS-resistant wheat germplasms in the middle and lower Yangtze River winter wheat region include Dahuangpi, Jiangsubaihuomai, Ningmai 8, Yangmai 10, Yangmai 158, Yangmai 20, and E ’en 5. In the north and northeast spring wheat region, Kefeng, Kehui, Kejin 1, Liaochun 2, Kehan 6, Daqingmang, Jinghong 8, Neimong 5, Longmai 26, and Longfumai 5 have high PHS resistance. PHS resistance is especially prominent among landraces and local wheat varieties [7].
Due to climate change, the Huang–Huai winter wheat area, which is the main wheat-producing area of China, is prone to frequent precipitation during the harvest period. PHS often occurs because semi-winter white-grained wheat varieties with weak PHS resistance are grown in this area, which significantly affects the production safety of the wheat. In this area, some varieties have acquired favorable PHS resistance, including Lanhuamai, Huixianhong, Baihuomai, Baiyupi, Neixiang 19, Neixiangbodijiang, Xiaoyan 5, Yumai 18, Bainong 64, and Bainong 3217 [7,57]; however, most of them are landraces, local varieties, or old varieties. Modern wheat varieties with high PHS resistance are relatively few in number. PHS-resistant germplasm resources in this region included mainly landraces or local varieties, which were eliminated because of their poor yield and agronomic traits. Because of the poor agronomic and yield characters of most local varieties or landraces, these wheat varieties are seldom utilized in production; instead, they are mostly used as parents in PHS resistance breeding. In the Huang–Huai wheat area, there are few white-grained varieties with favorable PHS resistance. Most are generally weak in PHS resistance. Because of the rainfall before harvest, the harm caused by PHS is more pronounced, making it one of the main negative factors affecting the safety of production in this wheat area. However, germplasm resources or modern varieties, such as Yumai 18, Bainong 64, Yumai7698, and Bainong 3217, are more suitable for the present requirement of PHS resistance breeding because of their favorable yield and agronomic traits. The Huang–Huai wheat area is one of the main wheat areas in China, and the few varieties with favorable PHS resistance cannot widely meet the needs of wheat safety production in this area. Therefore, the main way to solve the harm caused by PHS in this area is to strengthen the breeding of PHS resistance and cultivate more white-grain varieties with good PHS resistance.
In this study, a few advanced wheat lines with good PHS resistance were selected from crosses of the medium PHS resistance varieties Annong 0711(moderately resistant to PHS, GI: 21.6%) and Weilai 0818 (moderately resistant to PHS, GI: 27.2%) using phenotypic and molecular marker-assisted selections, according to the method in our previous study [58]. These lines are semi-winter white-grained wheat and will have good application prospects for PHS resistance breeding in the Huang–Huai wheat region (Table 3). These results also indicate that wheat PHS resistance can be significantly improved through cross breeding and marker-assisted selection, as well as providing a technical reference for wheat PHS resistance breeding.

5. Progress in Breeding PHS-Resistant Wheat in China

The winter wheat areas, including Chinese southwest, the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, as well as the spring wheat areas, including the northeast and the north, often experience rainy weather before wheat harvest, which facilitates PHS occurrence. In these wheat areas, red-grained spring wheat varieties are often developed and planted to resist PHS. Therefore, breeding wheat with high PHS resistance has always been one of the main goals in these regions. The breeding methods include traditional breeding, such as crossing and backcrossing between wheat parents (a method majorly used in China), and molecular breeding for PHS resistance (less used).

5.1. Traditional Breeding for PHS-Resistant Wheat

Under strict selection pressure (long-term natural and artificial selection), many wheat varieties with good PHS resistance have been identified and bred by the conventional hybridization method in PHS-prone areas. The resistance to PHS of these varieties is generally better than that of the varieties grown in the Huang–Huai and northern winter wheat regions. In the southwest winter wheat region, PHS-resistant varieties include Wanxianbaimaizi, Yongchuanbaimaizi, Fulingxuxumai, Chuanmai 11, Yonggang 2, Guimai 2, Mian 79-2, Chuanyu 26, Chuannong 16, Nanmai 991, and Mianmai 43 [7,59,60]. The varieties with high PHS resistance in the middle and lower Yangtze River winter wheat region include Dahuangpi, Jinda 2905, Ningmai 8, Ningmai 26, Yangmai 10, Yangmai 20, Yangmai 24, and Zhenmai 10 [7,61]. The varieties with high PHS resistance in the spring wheat areas of north and northeast China include Songhuajiang 1, Kefeng, Liaochun 1, Fengqiang 5, Neimai 17, Longfumai 5, Kechun 19, Longmai 39, and Longmai 72 [7,62,63,64], as shown in Table S1. Most of these varieties are red-grained spring varieties, including landraces, local varieties, and modern varieties developed more recently. However, most of the varieties with favorable PHS resistance are red-grained, while few white grained wheat varieties are cultivated and applied in these areas. The resistance mechanism is closely related to grain color: in other words, compared with the white-grained varieties, the red-grained varieties have more advantages in terms of PHS resistance, and this advantage has been maintained until now.
In the Huang–Huai and northern winter wheat areas, mainly white-grained semi-winter and winter wheat varieties are planted, and the PHS resistance of these varieties, especially of modern varieties, is generally poor. With climate change, the harm caused by PHS in these two wheat areas is becoming increasingly serious; therefore, many wheat breeders have gradually shifted their attention to improving PHS resistance. Some landraces and local wheat varieties with good PHS resistance are Sanyuehuang, Lanhuamai, Zaoyangmai, Bima 1, Hulutou, Beijing 15, and Baiyupi [7]. Generally, there were also some PHS-resistant modern varieties, including Yumai 18, Bainong 64, Shanxi 229, Lumai 21, Bainong 3217, Xiaoyan 6, Weilai 0818, Zhengmai 7698, Lumai 47, Annong0451, and Annong0805 [7,41,57]. The PHS resistance of these varieties reached a medium level, which was generally lower than that of the varieties in the southwest, middle, and lower reaches of the Yangtze River winter wheat region, as well as north and northeast spring wheat regions. However, the application of these varieties plays an important role in alleviating the harm caused by PHS in these wheat regions. As a result of climate change, the Huang–Huai winter wheat area is becoming increasingly prone to rainfall before harvest. Due to the lack of white-grained wheat varieties with high PHS resistance, the damage caused by PHS in this region is becoming more and more serious, and sometimes the loss is greater than that in traditionally PHS-prone wheat areas, such as the southwest winter wheat region (including Sichuan, Yunnan, Hunan, Hubei, and Guizhou, etc,), the middle and lower Yangtze River winter wheat region (including Jiangsu, Anhui, Hubei, etc.), and north and the northeast spring wheat regions (including Heilongjiang, Liaoning, Jilin, and Inner Mongolia) in China. It is necessary to breed and apply wheat varieties with strong resistance to PHS.

5.2. Molecular Marker-Assisted Selection Breeding for PHS-Resistant Varieties

Many previous studies have shown that the QTLs for PHS resistance were almost distributed across 21 chromosomes of wheat; seven regulatory genes were identified and several molecular markers were developed to use during PHS resistance breeding. However, most PHS-resistant varieties were bred by the conventional crossing of parents, and only a few varieties were developed by molecular breeding approaches. Additionally, a few genes/loci, mainly distributed on chromosomes 3A, 3B, and 4A, were effectively used in PHS resistance breeding (Table 1 and Table 2). Through the cross between Zhongmai 18 (PHS-resistant, GI: 20.1%) and Jining 13 (moderately PHS resistant, GI: 32.3%), Xiao et al. (2014) developed a white-grained semi-winter wheat variety with high PHS resistance, Zhongmai 911, using molecular marker-assisted selection of Barc 310 on 3AS [65]. The variety contained the favorable allele (Barc321-199 bp) for PHS resistance and had a lower GI (13.2%) compared with its parents (Table 4).
In our previous study [58], we pyramided the genes/loci on 3AS (Barc321a/TaMFT-3Aa), 3BL (TaVp-1Be), and 4AL (TaMKK3-Ab) from the parents Aizao 781 (moderately resistant to PHS, GI: 32.4%), Bainong 64 (moderately resistant to PHS, GI: 37.2%), and Yannong 19 (sensitive to PHS, GI: 71.6%). Through marker-assisted selection and phenotypic identification, the wheat variety Annong 0711 (moderately resistant to PHS, GI: 21.6%), which carried the favorable alleles on 3AS, 3BL, and 4AL [58], was developed with a higher PHS resistance than that of its parent varieties. These results indicated that these major genes/loci on chromosomes 3AS, 3BL, and 4AL can be used for breeding PHS-resistant varieties (Table 4).
From the perspective of the application of PHS-resistant gene/loci in wheat breeding, the gene resources that can be effectively applied are still limited to 3AS (Barc321/TaMFT-3A), 3BL (TaVp-1B) and 4AL (TaMKK3-A), while other reported genes/loci are rarely used. The reason may be that the functions of those genes need to be further verified, or they have little effect on PHS resistance and lack effectiveness. However, as more and more candidate genes/loci are excavated and identified, more and more genes will be used in wheat PHS resistance breeding [65].

5.3. Transgenic and Gene Editing Breeding for PHS-Resistant Varieties

So far, seven genes for PHS resistance have been identified, which can be used in transgenic and gene editing breeding. Huang et al. (2012) transferred the maize gene Vp-1, including promoter and coding regions, into the wheat variety Zhengmai 9023, and the seed GI value of T3–T5 of the transgenic generations decreased by 79%, 80%, and 82% compared with the wild type, respectively [66]. These results indicated that the maize gene Vp-1 can effectively improve the dormancy of grain and increase PHS resistance in wheat. Clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR), a gene editing technology, has made rapid developments in the past few years and has become an important tool for plant functional gene research and crop genetic improvement. The Qsd1 gene encodes alanine aminotransferase and is an important gene controlling dormancy in barley grains. In our study, TaQsd1 was obtained by homologous cloning in wheat, and its involvement in the regulation of seed dormancy was confirmed [47]. In a previous study, CRISPR-Cas9 technology was used to edit TaQsd1, and the genetically edited wheat had a significantly longer dormancy period and improved PHS resistance compared with the wild type [67]. In China, using CRISPR-Cas9 technology, Zhu et al. (2022) restored Tamyb10 in the white-grained variety Fielder to create PHS-resistant wheat. In their research, the transgenic plants with edited Tamyb10-B1a showed a higher elevated anthocyanin index of seed and PHS resistance than the wild type (Fielder), and the grain color changed from white in the wild type to red in the edited type [68]. Previous studies have shown that the application of gene-editing technology can effectively improve breeding progress of PHS resistance in wheat. Therefore, gene editing may be an efficient breeding technique for improving wheat PHS resistance. We also identified some genes and their dominant alleles for PHS resistance, including TaVp-1A (TaVp-1Ab, TaVp-1Ad), TaVp-1B (TaVp-1Bb, TaVp-1Bc, TaVp-1Bd, TaVp-1Be, and TaVp-1Bf), TaMFT-3A (TaMFT-3Aa), and TaQsd1 (TaQsd1-5Ba) [39,40,41,47,48]. Simultaneously, some candidate genes, such as TaGASR34, TaC3Hs, TaGATAs, TaVQs, TaIQDs and TaGA20ox1, were identified successively in our study, and can be considered as important gene resources for transgenic breeding or gene editing/breeding for improving wheat PHS resistance after further verifying their functions [50,51,52,53,54,55,56].

6. Conclusions and Perspectives

The main way to reduce the harmful effects of PHS is to breed new wheat varieties with favorable PHS resistance. Future studies should focus on detecting and identifying major genes/loci, creating and applying PHS-resistant germplasm resources, and improving breeding technology. Although many genes/loci associated with PHS resistance have been identified across 21 chromosomes, only a few have been applied in wheat breeding in China. The genes/loci on chromosomes 3A, 3B, and 4A are used more often than the others, which suggests that the other genes/loci may have low effects on PHS resistance in wheat. Therefore, it is particularly necessary to use forward and reverse genetics, bioinformatics, transcriptome analyses, and other approaches to detect major genes/loci for PHS resistance. Regarding germplasm resources, PHS-resistant, red-grained semi-spring varieties are relatively rich germplasm resources, which are mainly distributed in the winter wheat region of southwest, the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, and the spring wheat region of north and northeast of China. However, white-grained semi-winter wheat varieties are mainly planted in the Huang–Huai wheat region. The lack of favorable PHS-resistant germplasm resources harms the breeding of PHS-resistant varieties in this wheat region. Simultaneously, this lack of white-grained semi-winter varieties with high PHS resistance cannot fulfill the production requirements of the Huang–Huai wheat region. Therefore, identification of the genes/loci, as well as screening and production of germplasm resources, are crucial for genetically improving PHS-resistant wheat varieties.
To date, most breeding methods for PHS resistance involve traditional hybridization between the parents instead of molecular breeding. Previous studies have shown that molecular marker-assisted selection can effectively improve the efficiency and accuracy of breeding PHS-resistant wheat varieties such as Zhongmai 911 and Annong 0711. Other studies have also shown that transplanting genes and gene editing can significantly improve seed dormancy and PHS resistance. The identification of more genes for PHS resistance can broaden the scope of molecular breeding techniques (such as transgenic and gene editing techniques) in breeding wheat varieties. Therefore, it is particularly important to develop and identify excellent germplasm resources with high PHS resistance and to clone some functional genes with significant effects on PHS resistance during molecular breeding of wheat. Presently, transgenic and gene editing-based wheat varieties cannot be released and applied in the market in China. However, as effective molecular breeding techniques, the transgenic and gene editing approaches have received increasing attention for the breeding of PHS-resistant wheat varieties.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14040837/s1, Table S1: The information of Chinese wheat varieties in this study.

Author Contributions

C.C. and H.Z. were involved in the conceptualization and writing of the major part of the original draft; J.L. and H.S. were involved in manuscript review and editing; C.M. was involved in the conceptualization and provided the final editing and review of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the University Synergy Innovation Program of Anhui Province (GXXT-2021-058), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Joint Fund Projects, U20A2033), and Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2108085MC98), Scientific Research Project of higher education in Anhui Province (2022AH050885) and Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production (JCIC-MCP).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cao, S.H.; Xu, D.G.; Hanif, M.; Xia, X.C.; He, Z.H. Genetic architecture underpinning yield component traits in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 1811–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Brenchley, R.; Spannagl, M.; Pfeifer, M.; Barker, G.L.A.; D’amore, R.; Allen, A.M.; McKenzie, N.; Kramer, M.; Kerhornou, A.; Bolser, D.; et al. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature 2012, 491, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Brown, L.K.; Wiersma, A.T.; Olson, E.L. Preharvest sprouting and α-amylase activity in soft winter wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 79, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Black, J.D.; Bewley, P.H. The Encyclopedia of Seeds Science: Technology and Uses, 1st ed.; CAB International Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2006; pp. 528–530. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu, S.B.; Sehgal, S.K.; Li, J.R.; Lin, M.; Trick, H.N.; Yu, J.M.; Gill, B.S.; Bai, G.H. Cloning and characterization of a critical regulator for pre-harvest sprouting in wheat. Genetics 2013, 195, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Lang, J.; Fu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Cheng, M.; Deng, M.; Li, M.; Zhu, T.; Yang, J.; Guo, X.; Gui, L.; et al. Myb10-D confers PHS-3D resistance to pre-harvest sprouting by regulating NCED in ABA biosynthesis pathway of wheat. New Phytol. 2021, 230, 1940–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xiao, S.H.; Yan, C.S.; Zhang, H.P.; Sun, G.Z. Study on the Wheat Pre-Harvest Sprouting; China Agricultural Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lei, L.; Zhu, X.K.; Wang, S.W.; Zhu, M.R.; Carver, B.F.; Yan, L.L. TaMFT-A1 is associated with seed germination sensitive to temperature in winter wheat. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. King, R.W.; Richards, R.A. Water uptake in relation to pre-harvest sprouting damage in wheat: Ear characteristics. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1984, 35, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mares, D.J.; Mrva, K. Wheat grain pre-harvest sprouting and late maturity α-amylase. Planta 2014, 240, 1167–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rodriguez, M.V.; Barrero, J.M.; Corbineau, F.; Gubler, R.L.F. Dormancy in cereals (not too much, not so little): About the mechanisms behind this trait. Seed Sci. Res. 2015, 25, 99–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Olaerts, H.; Courtin, C.M. Impact of preharvest sprouting on endogenous hydrolases and technological quality of wheat and bread: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 698–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mori, M.; Uchino, N.; Chono, M.; Kato, K.; Miura, H. Mapping QTLs for grain dormancy on wheat chromosome 3A and group 4 chromosomes, and their combined effect. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 110, 1315–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ogbonnaya, F.C.; Imtiaz, M.; Ye, G.; Hearnden, P.R.; Hernandez, E.; Eastwood, R.F.; Van Ginkel, M.; Shorter, S.C.; Winchester, J.M. Genetic and QTL analysis of seed dormancy and preharvest sprouting resistance in the wheat germplasm CN10955. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2008, 116, 891–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, S.B.; Bai, G.H. Dissection and fine mapping of a major QTL for preharvest sprouting resistance in white wheat Rio Blanco. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 121, 1395–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kulwal, P.; Ishikawa, G.; Benscher, D.; Feng, Z.Y.; Yu, L.X.; Jadhav, A.; Mehetre, S.; Sorrells, M.E. Association mapping for pre-harvest sprouting resistance in white winter wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 125, 793–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhu, Y.L.; Wang, S.X.; Zhang, H.P.; Zhao, L.X.; Wu, Z.Y.; Jiang, H.; Cao, J.J.; Liu, K.; Qin, M.; Lu, J.; et al. Identification of major loci for seed dormancy at different post-ripening stages after harvest and validation of a novel locus on chromosome 2AL in common wheat. Mol. Breed. 2016, 36, 174–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, S.B.; Cai, S.B.; Graybosch, R.; Chen, C.X.; Bai, G.H. Quantitative trait loci for resistance to pre-harvest sprouting in US hard white winter wheat Rio Blanco. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2008, 117, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lin, M.; Zhang, D.; Liu, S.; Zhang, G.; Yu, J.; Fritz, A.K.; Bai, G. Genome-wide association analysis on pre-harvest sprouting resistance and grain color in US winter wheat. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Zhang, H.P.; Feng, J.M.; Chang, C.; Ma, C.X.; Zhang, X.Y.; Yan, C.S.; You, G.X.; Xiao, S.H. Investigation of main loci contributing to strong seed dormancy of Chinese wheat landrace. J. Agric. Biot. 2011, 19, 270–277. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhu, Y.L.; Wang, S.X.; Zhao, L.X.; Zhang, D.X.; Hu, J.B.; Cao, X.L.; Yang, Y.J.; Chang, C.; Ma, C.X.; Zhang, H.P. Exploring molecular markers of preharvest sprouting resistance gene using wheat intact spikes by Association Analysis. Acta Agron. Sin. 2014, 40, 1725–1732. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Albrecht, T.; Oberforster, M.; Kempf, H.; Ramgraber, L.; Schacht, J.; Kazman, E.; Zechner, E.; Neumayer, A.; Hartl, L.; Mohler, V. Genome-wide association mapping of preharvest sprouting resistance in a diversity panel of European winter wheats. J. Appl. Genet. 2015, 56, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shao, M.; Bai, G.; Rife, T.W.; Poland, J.; Lin, M.; Liu, S.; Chen, H.; Kumssa, T.; Fritz, A.; Trick, H.; et al. QTL mapping of pre-harvest sprouting resistance in a white wheat cultivar Danby. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 1683–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zuo, J.H.; Lin, C.; Cao, H.; Chen, F.Y.; Liu, Y.X.; Liu, J.D. Genome-wide association study and quantitative trait loci mapping of seed dormancy in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Planta 2019, 250, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Groos, C.; Gay, G.; Perretant, M.R.; Gervais, L.; Bernard, M.; Dedryver, F.; Charmet, G. Study of the relationship between pre-harvest sprouting and grain color by quantitative trait loci analysis in a white–red grain bread wheat cross. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 104, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Osa, M.; Kato, K.; Mori, M.; Shindo, C.; Torada, A.; Miura, H. Mapping QTLs for seed dormancy and the Vp1 homologue on chromosome 3A in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2003, 106, 1491–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kulwal, P.L.; Kumar, N.; Gaur, A.; Khurana, P.; Khurana, J.P.; Tyagi, A.K.; Balyan, H.S.; Gupta, P.K. Mapping of a major QTL for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance on chromosome 3A in bread wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 111, 1052–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mohan, A.; Kulwal, P.; Singh, R.; Kumar, V.; Mir, R.R.; Kumar, J.; Prasad, M.; Balyan, H.S.; Gupta, P.K. Genome-wide QTL analysis for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in bread wheat. Euphytica 2009, 168, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhou, Y.; Tang, H.; Cheng, M.P.; Dankwa, K.O.; Chen, Z.X.; Li, Z.Y.; Gao, S.; Liu, Y.X.; Jiang, Q.T.; Lan, X.J.; et al. Genome-wide association study for pre-harvest sprouting resistance in a large germplasm collection of Chinese wheat landraces. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zhu, Y.; Wang, S.; Wei, W.; Xie, H.; Liu, K.; Zhang, C.; Wu, Z.; Jiang, H.; Cao, J.; Zhao, L.; et al. Genome-wide association study of pre-harvest sprouting tolerance using a 90K SNP array in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 2947–2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kato, K.; Nakamura, W.; Tabiki, T.; Miura, H.; Sawada, S. Detection of loci controlling seed dormancy on group 4 chromosomes of wheat and comparative mapping with rice and barley genomes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2001, 102, 980–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, C.X.; Cai, S.B.; Bai, G.H. A major QTL controlling seed dormancy and pre-harvest sprouting resistance on chromosome 4A in a Chinese wheat landrace. Mol. Breed. 2008, 21, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Torada, A.; Ikeguchi, S.; Koike, M. Mapping and validation of PCR-based markers associated with a major QTL for seed dormancy in wheat. Euphytica 2005, 143, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mares, D.; Mrva, K.; Cheong, J.; Williams, K.; Watson, B.; Storlie, E.; Sutherland, M.; Zou, Y. A QTL located on chromosome 4A associated with dormancy in white- and red-grained wheats of diverse origin. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 111, 1357–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, X.Q.; Li, C.D.; Tay, A.; Lance, R.; Mares, D.; Judy Cheong, J.; Cakir, M.; Ma, J.H.; Appels, R. A new PCR-based marker on chromosome 4AL for resistance to pre-harvest sprouting in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol. Breed. 2008, 22, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rasul, G.; Humphreys, D.G.; Brûlé-Babel, A.; Mccartney, C.A.; Knox, R.E.; Depauw, R.M.; Somers, D.J. Mapping QTLs for pre-harvest sprouting traits in the spring wheat cross ‘RL4452/AC Domain’. Euphytica 2009, 168, 363–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, S.B.; Bai, G.H.; Cai, S.B.; Chen, C.X. Dissection of genetic components of preharvest sprouting resistance in white wheat. Mol. Breed. 2011, 27, 511–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, Y.; Zhao, X.L.; Xia, L.Q.; Chen, X.M.; Xia, X.C.; Yu, Z.; He, Z.H.; Rŏder, M. Development and validation of a Viviparous-1 STS marker for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in Chinese wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007, 115, 971–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chang, C.; Feng, J.M.; Si, H.Q.; Yin, B.; Zhang, H.P.; Ma, C.X. Validating a novel allele of viviparous-1 (Vp-1Bf) associated with high seed dormancy of Chinese wheat landrace, Wanxianbaimaizi. Mol. Breed. 2010, 25, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chang, C.; Zhang, H.P.; Feng, J.M.; Yin, B.; Si, H.Q.; Ma, C.X. Identifying alleles of Viviparous-1B associated with pre-harvest sprouting in micro-core collections of Chinese wheat germplasm. Mol. Breed. 2010, 25, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chang, C.; Zhang, H.P.; Zhao, Q.X.; Feng, J.M.; Si, H.Q.; Lu, J.; Ma, C.X. Rich allelic variations of Viviparous-1A and their associations with seed dormancy/pre-harvest sprouting of common wheat. Euphytica 2011, 179, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, Y.; Zhang, C.L.; Liu, S.X.; Sun, Y.Q.; Meng, J.Y.; Xia, L.Q. Characterization of the rich haplotypes of Viviparous-1A in Chinese wheats and development of a novel sequence-tagged site marker for pre-harvest sprouting resistance. Mol. Breed. 2014, 33, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ashikawa, I.; Abe, F.; Nakamura, S. Ectopic expression of wheat and barley DOG1-like genes promotes seed dormancy in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2010, 179, 536–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nakamura, S.; Abe, F.; Kawahigashi, H.; Nakazono, K.; Tagiri, A.; Matsumoto, T.; Utsugi, S.; Ogawa, T.; Handa, H.; Ishida, H.; et al. A wheat homolog of MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 acts in the regulation of germination. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 3215–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Zhang, Y.J.; Miao, X.L.; Xia, X.C.; He, Z.H. Cloning of seed dormancy genes (TaSdr) associated with tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting in common wheat and development of a functional marker. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127, 855–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Torada, A.; Koike, M.; Ogawa, T.; Takenouchi, Y.; Tadamura, K.; Wu, J.; Matsumoto, T.; Kawaura, K.; Ogihara, Y. A causal gene for seed dormancy on wheat chromosome 4A encodes a MAP kinase kinase. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 782–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wei, W.; Min, X.; Shan, S.; Jiang, H.; Cao, J.; Li, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Lu, J.; et al. Isolation and characterization of TaQsd1 genes for period of dormancy in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol. Breed. 2019, 39, 150–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jiang, H.; Zhao, L.X.; Chen, X.J.; Cao, J.J.; Wu, Z.-Y.; Liu, K.; Zhang, C.; Wei, W.-X.; Xie, H.-Y.; Li, L.; et al. A novel 33-bp insertion in the promoter of TaMFT-3A is associated with pre-harvest sprouting resistance in common wheat. Mol. Breed. 2018, 38, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Y.J.; Xia, X.C.; He, Z.H. The seed dormancy allele TaSdr-A1a associated with pre-harvest sprouting tolerance is mainly present in Chinese wheat landraces. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2017, 130, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cheng, X.; Wang, S.; Xu, D.; Liu, X.; Li, X.; Xiao, W.; Cao, J.; Jiang, H.; Min, X.; Wang, J.; et al. Identification and analysis of the GASR gene family in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and characterization of TaGASR34, a gene associated with seed dormancy and germination. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cheng, X.; Cao, J.; Gao, C.; Gao, W.; Yan, S.; Yao, H.; Xu, K.; Liu, X.; Xu, D.; Pan, X.; et al. Identification of the wheat C3H gene family and expression analysis of candidates associated with seed dormancy and germination. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 156, 524–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cheng, X.; Tian, B.; Gao, C.; Gao, W.; Yan, S.; Yao, H.; Wang, X.; Jiang, Y.; Hu, L.; Pan, X.; et al. Identification and expression analysis of candidate genes related to seed dormancy and germination in the wheat GATA family. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 169, 343–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cheng, X.; Gao, C.; Liu, X.; Xu, D.; Pan, X.; Gao, W.; Yan, S.; Yao, H.; Cao, J.; Min, X.; et al. Characterization of the wheat VQ protein family and expression of candidate genes associated with seed dormancy and germination. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Liu, M.L.; Wang, Z.F.; Wang, C.C.; Pan, X.; Gao, W.; Yan, S.N.; Cao, J.J.; Lu, J.; Chang, C.; Ma, C.X.; et al. Identification of the wheat (Triticum aestivum) IQD gene family and an expression analysis of candidate genes associated with seed dormancy and germination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jiang, H.; Gao, W.; Jiang, B.L.; Liu, X.; Jiang, Y.T.; Zhang, L.T.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, S.-N.; Cao, J.-J.; Lu, J.; et al. Identification and validation of coding and non-coding RNAs involved in high temperature-mediated seed dormancy in common wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1107277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Liu, M.; Wang, C.; Xu, Q.; Pan, Y.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, Z.; Lu, J.; Ma, C.; et al. Genome-wide identification of the CPK gene family in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and characterization of TaCPK40 associated with seed dormancy and germination. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 196, 608–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Huang, Y.W.; Dai, X.R.; Liu, H.W.; Yang, L.; Mai, C.Y.; Yu, L.Q.; Liu, C.H.; Li, H.J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, H.J. Progress on identification of resistant QTLs/Genes associated with wheat pre-harvest sprouting and application in molecular breeding. J. Triticeae Crops 2021, 41, 147–156. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhang, H.P.; Chang, C.; Si, H.Q.; Lu, J.; Ma, C.X. Developing of molecular marker for pre- harvest sprouting resistance and its application in wheat MAS breeding. Sci. Technol. Rev. 2016, 34, 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  59. Luo, J.T.; Zheng, J.M.; Pu, Z.J.; Li, S.Z. Pre-harvest sprouting resistance of Sichuan wheat varieties (Lines): An evaluation. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2019, 35, 1–6. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang, Q.; Liu, Z.H.; Wan, H.S.; Wei, H.T.; Long, H.; Li, T.; Deng, G.B.; Li, J.; Yang, W.Y. Identification and pyramiding of QTLs for traits associated with pre-harvest sprouting resistance in two wheat cultivars Chuanmai 42 and Chuannong 16. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2020, 53, 3421–3431. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhu, D.M.; Li, M.; Li, D.S.; Wu, S.L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, B.Q. Evaluation and determination method of pre-harvest sprouting resistance of new wheat cultivars in middle and lower reaches of Yangtze river. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci. 2018, 32, 795–801. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  62. Liu, N.T.; Shao, L.G.; Che, J.Y.; Li, C.H.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Gao, F.M.; Zhang, Q.C.; Zhou, D.Y.; Tian, C.; et al. A new spring wheat variety with high quality and pre-harvest sprouting resistance, Kechun 19. China Seed Ind. 2020, 4, 83–84. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  63. Yang, X.F.; Song, W.F.; Zhao, L.J.; Liu, D.J.; Song, Q.J. High quality wheat variety Longmai 39 with strong gluten and high pre-harvest sprouting resistance and cultivation techniques. China Seed Ind. 2020, 4, 74–75. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  64. Liu, D.J.; Song, W.F.; Yang, X.F.; Zhao, L.J.; Song, Q.J. A new wheat variety Longmai 72 with high pre-harvest sprouting resistance. China Seed Ind. 2021, 6, 114–115. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  65. Xiao, S.H.; Zhang, H.P.; You, G.X.; Zhang, X.Y.; Yan, C.S.; Chen, X. Integration of marker-assisted selection for resistance to pre-harvest sprouting with selection for grain-filling rate in breeding of white-kernelled wheat for the Chinese environment. Euphytica 2012, 188, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Huang, T.; Qu, B.; Li, H.P.; Zuo, D.Y.; Zhao, Z.X.; Liao, Y.C. A maize viviparous 1 gene increases seed dormancy and preharvest sprouting tolerance in transgenic wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 2012, 55, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Abe, F.; Haque, E.; Hisano, H.; Tanaka, T.; Kamiya, Y.; Mikami, M.; Kawaura, K.; Endo, M.; Onishi, K.; Hayashi, T.; et al. Genome-edited triple-recessive mutation alters seed dormancy in wheat. Cell Rep. 2019, 28, 1362–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Zhu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Fan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, P.; Xiong, J.; He, Y.; Cheng, S.; Ye, X.; Wang, F.; et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated restoration of Tamyb10 to create pre-harvest sprouting-resistant red wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 665–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. The quantitative trait loci for pre-harvest sprouting resistance on chromosomes 3A and 4A.
Table 1. The quantitative trait loci for pre-harvest sprouting resistance on chromosomes 3A and 4A.
ChromosomeMolecular MarkersPhysical Site/MbPVE%References
3ASBarc310/Bcd9077.111.6–44.8[13]
Barc12/Barc32111.7.7–15.510.1–41.0[18]
Barc12/Barc57/
Barc57/Barc321		10.3.2–15.5-[15]
Barc57/Barc2947.9–10.325.6–48.3[20]
Barc321/Barc5710.3.2–11.75.7–15[21]
Barc310/wPt-45457.16.5–6.9/
5.7–6.6		[22]
wsnp_Ra_c2339_4506620/Xbarc5710.2–10.38.5–8.7/
13.7–15.9		[19]
KASP-2227.321.6–41[23]
Tdurum_contig83209_316/Kukri_c1568_9424.25–5.4[24]
3ALfbb293-5.5–7.9/4.5–7.1[25]
Bcd1380/fbb370
fbb370/Bcd907		636.723.3–
38.2		[26]
Bcd141/Cdo345657.913[26]
Wmc153/Gwm155701.7–703.024.7–35.2[27]
Wmc153/Gwm155701.7–703.016[28]
Tamyb10-A1-66704.06.8–12.1/
7.5–11.1		[19]
AX-109376167/AX-111037462596.0–596.319.3–35.7[29]
IWB63289/IWB72045689.5–741.23.4–8.6[30]
AX-111578083704.511.5–25.1[29]
4ALCdo795/Psr115545.6–634.733–77.2[31]
Cdo795/Bcd808545.612.9–13.6[13]
Barc170/Gwm397607.913.1–23.3[32]
Gwm397,Barc170,Hbe03607.96.9–43.3[33]
Gwm397, Gwm269,Barc170607.925–38[34]
Gwm637/Gwm937-9.3–40.8/14.3–39.8[14]
ZXQ118,Barc170,Wg622,Gwm269607.9-[35]
Gwm494634.46.3–12[36]
Barc170-Gwm397607.92.5–17.8/7–17.5[37]
Gwm397607.96.7–10.0[22]
Ex_c66324_1151/wsnp_Ex_rep_c66324_64493429604.2–604.29.8–47.6[19]
AX-111634210718.919.5–36.4[29]
IWB23723617.013.9[30]
Note: - means no data. PVE: phenotypic variance explained.
Table
Table 2. The genes and their favorable alleles for pre-harvest sprouting PHS resistance in wheat.
Table 2. The genes and their favorable alleles for pre-harvest sprouting PHS resistance in wheat.
GenesChromosomesMarkersPhysical Site/MbFavorable AllelesReferences
TaVp-13ALVp-1A659.6TaVp-1Ab, TaVp-1Ad[41]
Vp1A3TaVp-1Agm[42]
3BLVp1-b2693.3TaVp-1Bb, TaVp-1Bc, TaVp-1Bd, TaVp-1Be and TaVp-1Bf[39,40]
Vp1B3TaVp-1Bb, TaVp-1Bc[38]
TaDOG1L1 DOG1L1534.5-[43]
TaMFT/TaPHS13ASMFT-A17.3TaMFT-A1b[8]
MFT-A2TaMFT-3Aa[48]
MFT-3A SNP-222(C)[44]
TaPHS1-SNP1/TaPHS1-SNP1SNP646/666 (G/A)[5]
TaSdr2ASdr2A158.5TaSdr-A1a[49]
2BSdr2B200.6TaSdr-B1a[45]
TaMKK34ALMKKAC710.2TaMKK3-A1b[46]
TaQsd15BQSD1387.7TaQsd1-5Ba[47]
TaMyb10-D3DPHS-3D570.8Myb10-D[6]
Note: - means no data. PVE: phenotypic variance explained.
Table
Table 3. The advanced lines of wheat with favorable pre-harvest sprouting resistance.
Table 3. The advanced lines of wheat with favorable pre-harvest sprouting resistance.
No.Names of LinesCross of Two ParentsGI Value/%PHS Resistance Level
1WA-2Weilai 0818/Annong 071115.1R
2WA-19Weilai 0818/Annong 071120.0R
3WA-23Weilai 0818/Annong 071110.2R
4WA-41Weilai 0818/Annong 071119.3R
5WA-115Weilai 0818/Annong 071120.0R
6Annong98Bainng207/Wannong0917429.4MR
Note: GI means germination index. R and MR mean resistance and moderate resistance, respectively.
Table
Table 4. The varieties developed by marker-assisted selection.
Table 4. The varieties developed by marker-assisted selection.
VarietiesParentsTypeGenes/Loci for PHS ResistanceFavorable AllelesGI Value/%
Zhongmai 911Zhongmai 18White-grained semi winter3AS (Barc310)Barc310-199bp20.1
Jining 13White-grained semi winter--32.2
Annong0711Aizao 781White-grained semi sbring3AS (Barc321)Barc321a32.4
Bainong 64White-grained semi winter3AS/3BL/4ALTaMFT-3Aa/TaVp-1Be/TaMKK3-Ab37.2
Yannong 19White-grained semi winter3AS/4ALTaMFT-3Aa/TaMKK3-Ab71.6
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, C.; Zhang, H.; Lu, J.; Si, H.; Ma, C. Genetic Improvement of Wheat with Pre-Harvest Sprouting Resistance in China. Genes 2023, 14, 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14040837

AMA Style

Chang C, Zhang H, Lu J, Si H, Ma C. Genetic Improvement of Wheat with Pre-Harvest Sprouting Resistance in China. Genes. 2023; 14(4):837. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14040837

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Cheng, Haiping Zhang, Jie Lu, Hongqi Si, and Chuanxi Ma. 2023. "Genetic Improvement of Wheat with Pre-Harvest Sprouting Resistance in China" Genes 14, no. 4: 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14040837

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop