Next Article in Journal
Prediction of Tumor Development and Urine-Based Liquid Biopsy for Molecule-Targeted Therapy of Gliomas
Next Article in Special Issue
Vitrification with Dimethyl Sulfoxide Induces Transcriptomic Alteration of Gene and Transposable Element Expression in Immature Human Oocytes
Previous Article in Journal
Whole Genome Resequencing Helps Study Important Traits in Chickens
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 14
Issue 6
10.3390/genes14061200
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Landscape of Telomere Length and Telomerase in Human Embryos at Blastocyst Stage

by
Fang Wang
1,2,*,
David H. McCulloh
1,
Kasey Chan
2,
Ashley Wiltshire
1,
Caroline McCaffrey
1,
James A. Grifo
1 and
David L. Keefe
1,2
1
NYU Langone Fertility Center, New York, NY 10022, USA
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Grossman, School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(6), 1200; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061200
Submission received: 1 May 2023 / Revised: 19 May 2023 / Accepted: 26 May 2023 / Published: 30 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Genomics of Female Reproduction)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The telomere length of human blastocysts exceeds that of oocytes and telomerase activity increases after zygotic activation, peaking at the blastocyst stage. Yet, it is unknown whether aneuploid human embryos at the blastocyst stage exhibit a different profile of telomere length, telomerase gene expression, and telomerase activity compared to euploid embryos. In present study, 154 cryopreserved human blastocysts, donated by consenting patients, were thawed and assayed for telomere length, telomerase gene expression, and telomerase activity using real-time PCR (qPCR) and immunofluorescence (IF) staining. Aneuploid blastocysts showed longer telomeres, higher telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) mRNA expression, and lower telomerase activity compared to euploid blastocysts. The TERT protein was found in all tested embryos via IF staining with anti-hTERT antibody, regardless of ploidy status. Moreover, telomere length or telomerase gene expression did not differ in aneuploid blastocysts between chromosomal gain or loss. Our data demonstrate that telomerase is activated and telomeres are maintained in all human blastocyst stage embryos. The robust telomerase gene expression and telomere maintenance, even in aneuploid human blastocysts, may explain why extended in vitro culture alone is insufficient to cull out aneuploid embryos during in vitro fertilization.

1. Introduction

Telomeres, the unique DNA–protein complexes with variable numbers of telomeric DNA repeats (TTAGGG), protect chromosome ends from DNA degradation, the DNA damage response, and chromosome fusions [1]. Telomere length is primarily maintained by telomerase, a reverse transcriptase composed of a catalytic unit (telomerase reverse transcriptase, TERT) and an RNA template (telomerase RNA component, TERC) [2]. In addition, homology-directed telomere synthesis, called alternative lengthening of telomere (ALT), can maintain telomere length when telomerase activity is inefficient or absent [3]. Cancer cells escape senescence by maintaining telomere length via telomerase or ALT [4]. In contrast, telomeres in somatic cells, which lack telomerase or ALT, progressively shorten as cells divide [5].
Telomerase activity in mouse, bovine, and human oocytes is low or undetectable, and telomeres are remarkably short in this differentiated, aging-sensitive cell type [6]. In contrast, telomerase activity in spermatogonia is high, so telomeres in sperm are much longer than in oocytes or somatic cells [7]. After zygotic genome activation, telomerase activity gradually increases and peaks at blastocyst stage. Telomeres lengthen from zygote to blastocyst stages, as determined by both qPCR and Quantitiative Fluorescent in situ hybridization (Q-FISH) [8]. Telomerase repeated amplification protocol (TRAP) assay demonstrates very low telomerase activity in human oocytes and cleavage stage embryos, with the highest level of telomerase activity being at the blastocyst stage of development [9]. Telomere dynamics, telomerase gene expression, and activity in human blastocysts remain poorly studied.
In most cell types, the loss of telomeric DNA repeats or deficiencies in telomeric proteins lead to chromosome fusions and chromosome instability [10]. Consistent with this, gametes from telomerase null mice (mTR−/−) develop poorly after in vitro fertilization (IVF) and lead to aberrant embryos, with impaired preimplantation development [11]. Moreover, late-generation mTR−/− mice exhibit an abnormal reproductive phenotype, with severe germ cell depletion [12]. In women, telomere length has been linked to the developmental competency of early embryos. Women with advanced reproductive age have shorter leukocyte telomere length and higher rates of aneuploid embryo when undergoing IVF treatment [13,14]. Women with telomeropathies suffer decreased ovarian reserve [15] and increased risk of aneuploid embryos following IVF, with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) [16]. In contrast, telomere length in spermatozoa increases with paternal age, presumably due to the high telomerase activity in spermatogonia. Intriguingly, advanced paternal age also increases sperm telomere length heterogeneity, and may lower the quality of spermatozoa [17,18].
A recent study reported no difference in telomere length between euploid vs. aneuploid cleavage stage human embryos through single cell whole genome amplification (WTA) assay [19]. Telomere content measured by the qPCR of trophectoderm cells also did not differ between biopsied aneuploid and euploid blastocysts, though the polar bodies of oocytes which gave rise to aneuploid blastocysts contained decreased telomere content [20]. Mania et al. [21] found shorter telomeres in single blastomeres from aneuploid compared to euploid cleavage stage embryos. Together, these studies suggest telomere length resets from oocyte to blastocyst stage in human preimplantation embryo development, but the profiles of telomere length, telomerase gene expression, and activity in human aneuploid blastocysts remain poorly understood. In this study, we compared telomere length, telomerase gene expression, and activity between euploid and aneuploid human blastocysts.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Approval

Cryopreserved human blastocysts donated by patients with written informed research consent under NYU Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval (S16-00154) were de-identified after the extraction of key clinical parameters.

2.2. Materials

All reagents were purchased from MilliporeSigma if not otherwise stated. All DNA oligos were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies and dissolved in TE buffer (pH = 8) or nuclease-free water for stocking solution at 100 µM. Working solutions of oligos were diluted in nuclease-free water to obtain the required concentration.
Donated blastocysts were selected for the study according to results of their PGT-A analysis. The ploidy status of each blastocyst is listed in Table S1. Individual blastocysts were thawed with Vit Kit-Thaw kits (FUJIFILM Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA, USA, Cat# 90137-SO) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and then incubated in acidic Tyrode’s solution to remove zona pellucidae, followed by three washes in 0.1% PBS/PVP buffer. Denuded blastocysts were then processed for various assays.

2.3. Genomic DNA and mRNA Separation from Individual Human Blastocysts

To isolate genomic DNA and mRNA, the individual denuded blastocyst was micro-pipetted into a PCR tube with 0.5 µL of 0.1% PBS/PVP buffer under a microscope to confirm no loss of the blastocyst. Then, 2.5 µL of RLT plus lysis buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany, Cat# 1053393) was added into each PCR tube. Lysed blastocysts in PCR tubes were stored in a −80 °C freezer until further analysis. Genomic DNA and mRNA of each blastocyst were extracted simultaneously by following the G&T-seq protocol with modifications [22]. The oligos’ sequences and reagents used here can be found in the G&T-seq protocol. Briefly, 4 µL of Dynabeads per blastocyst was prepared for banding oligo-dT30VN, and then 50 µL of G&T-seq wash buffer was used to wash away DNA. Separated DNA was collected in a new PCR tube and stored in a −80 °C freezer. Isolated mRNA was transcribed to cDNA with 10 µL of reverse transcription (RT) master mix. Once the RT reaction was finished, the cDNA product was immediately amplified using the Kapa HiFi HotStart ReadyMix and IS PCR primer with a total volume of 15 µL per PCR reaction. Amplified cDNA was purified using AMPure X beads with 50 µL of water to elute, and then was stored in a −20 °C freezer for the gene expression assay.

2.4. Real-Time PCR for Relative Telomerase Gene Expression and Telomere Length Measurement

The purified cDNA of each blastocyst was diluted 50 times by adding nuclease-free water before the PCR setup. Each reaction contained 5 µL of diluted cDNA, 10 µL of SYBR green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA, Cat#1708882), 1 µL each of forward and reverse primer (4 μM), and 3 μL of nuclease-free water. Duplicate reactions were set up for each sample per targetand then run through the program “CFX_3stepAMP”, with the annealing temperature set as 60 °C on the Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The melting curve was run to confirm the specific amplification for each pair of primers. A housekeeping gene, GAPDH, was run as an internal control. The relative telomerase TERT gene expression was compared using the 2−ΔΔCt method.
Relative telomere length was measured by a qPCR method that Cawthon [23] developed in 2002, which was modified for the use of small amounts of DNA. A multi-copy gene, 5S rDNA [24], served as an internal reference instead of the single copy gene 36B4 to avoid single copy gene amplification drop-off. A total of 20 µL of PCR reaction per primer pair was mixed by combining 10 µL of SYBR green Supermix, 0.5 µL each of forward and reverse primer (10 μM), 7 µL of nuclease-free water, and 2 μL of separated DNA after the G&T-seq protocol. Triplicate reactions per blastocyst per primer pair were set in a 96-well plate and then run through the program “CFX_2stepAMP”, with the annealing/extension temperature set as 60 °C. The melting curve analysis showed the single peak of the amplicon for each pair of primers. One euploid blastocyst was treated as the normalizer in different PCR plates, and relative telomere length was calculated as the T/S ratio by 2−ΔΔCt.
The primers for telomere length measurement and telomerase gene expression are listed in Table 1.

2.5. Immunofluorescence Staining

Denuded blastocysts were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS for 10 min and then permeabilized in freshly made 0.5% Triton X-100 in 0.1% PVP/PBS for 15 min after rinsing 3 times in 0.1% PVP/PBS at room temperature. Fixed blastocysts were transferred into blocking buffer (2% goat serum, 1% BSA, 0.1% cold fish skin gelatin, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.05% Tween 20, 0.05% sodium azide in PBS) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Then, blastocysts were incubated in an anti-hTERT antibody (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, Cat# PA5116024) solution diluted with blocking buffer in a 1 to 200 ratio at 37 °C for 1 h. Two aneuploid blastocysts were incubated with blocking buffer without the anti-hTERT antibody to serve as a negative control. All blastocysts, including the negative control blastocysts, were washed 3 times in blocking buffer for a total of 30 min, and then incubated with Goat anti-Rabbit IgG 2nd antibody (ThermoFisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA, Cat#35552) diluted 1:400 in blocking buffer at 37 °C for 30 min. After the second antibody incubation, blastocysts were washed three times in blocking buffer for 15 min. Immunostained blastocysts were loaded on a pre-cleaned glass slide with 15 µL of VectorShield with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Newark, CA, USA, Cat# H-1200-10) and sealed with a coverslip and clear nail polish. Images were taken with a Zeiss microscope equipped with epifluorescence optics.

2.6. Telomerase Activity Quantification in Individual Human Blastocysts by TRAP-qPCR Assay

The telomerase activity of individual human blastocysts was quantitatively compared using a commercial qPCR assay kit (ScienCell Research Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA, Cat#8928) with minor modifications. Individual denuded blastocyst was placed in a PCR tube with 0.2 µL PBS/PVP after being washed three times in 0.1% PBS/PVP. Then, 1 µL of cell lysis buffer supplied with PMSF and β-mercaptoethanol, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, was added into the same PCR tube for 30 min at 4 °C. Lysed blastocysts in the PCR tubes were then flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in a −80 °C freezer. The telomerase reaction was set up in the same PCR tube containing blastocyst lysate by directly adding 4 µL of 5X telomerase reaction buffer and 15 µL of nuclease-free water. All PCR tubes containing the telomerase reaction mix were placed in a thermocycler to incubate at 37 °C for 3 h, followed by inactivation at 85 °C for 10 min. Real-time PCR reaction then was prepared with 2 µL of post telomerase reaction product, 2 µL TPS primer stock solution, 10 µL of 2X GoldNStart TaqGreen qPCR master mix, and 6 µL of nuclease-free water. The positive control and negative control supplied with the kit were prepared by following the instructions while preparing blastocysts. Each sample was set with a duplicate reaction in a 96-well PCR plate, and then run through the program in a Bio-Rad CFX96 thermocycler as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The relative telomerase activity of each blastocyst to the positive control was calculated by 2−ΔCq (ΔCq = Cq of blastocyst − Cq of positive control).

3. Results

3.1. Evaluation of Telomere Length

Telomere length was measured by real-time PCR in 120 human blastocysts from 30 subjects. One blastocyst was excluded from data analysis due to failure of amplification. The relative telomere length of each blastocyst and its ploidy status are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Blastocysts were categorized into five groups according to chromosome status: (1) euploid (n = 4), (2) segmental/mosaic involving one chromosome (n = 6), (3) aneuploid involving one chromosome, either loss or gain (n = 35), (4) aneuploid involving two chromosomes (n = 25), and (5) aneuploid involving three or more chromosomes (complex abnormal) (n = 49).
Telomere length did not significantly differ among the five groups (Kruskal–Wallis test, p = 0.258; Figure 1A). Mean telomere length in human blastocysts tended to increase with increasing chromosomal abnormalities, though linear regression did not show this trend to be statistically significant (R2 = 0.006, p = 0.36; Figure 1A). Telomere length in aneuploid blastocysts was markedly longer than that in euploid and segmental/mosaic embryos (2.238 ± 1.724 vs. 1.26 ± 0.349, p = 0.002 and 2.238 ± 1.724 vs. 1.752 ± 0.323, p = 0.029, respectively; Welch’s t test; Figure 1B). Telomeres in segmental/mosaic did not differ from those in euploid blastocysts (1.752 ± 0.323 vs. 1.26 ± 0.349; t test, p = 0.051; Figure 1B). In addition, aneuploid blastocysts presented greater heterogeneity in telomere length compared to euploid and mosaic/segmental blastocysts, as quantified by the F test to compare variances (F = 24.35, p = 0.02).
To exclude the impact of patient-specific clinical parameters, e.g., age and BMI, we compared telomere length in sibling euploid and aneuploid embryos from three subjects (#26, #29 and #30; Supplementary Table S1). The telomere length in sibling aneuploid embryos did not differ from sibling euploid embryos (1.56 ± 0.60 vs. 1.26 ± 0.35; t test, p = 0.392; Figure 1C).
Since aging is a major risk factor for aneuploidy, we sought to determine whether maternal age was associated with telomere length in aneuploid blastocysts. The scatter plots shown in Figure 1D indicate that telomere length in aneuploid blastocysts increased with advancing maternal age (R2 = 0.06, p = 0.01). Paternal age did not impact telomere length (R2 = 0.03, p = 0.09).

3.2. The Expression of the hTERT Gene

We isolated mRNA from the same blastocysts used to measure telomere length, and quantified the expression level of TERT mRNA, using the expression of GAPDH mRNA as a control. The levels of TERT mRNA in each blastocyst are shown in Supplementary Table S1. In concordance with telomere length comparison, the TERT mRNA level in aneuploid (median = 643.8; 95% CI [818.7, 1420]) was much higher than that in euploid blasts (median = 35; 95% CI [−512.7, 1050]) (Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.033; Figure 2A). TERT mRNA expression in segmental/mosaic did not differ from that in euploid or aneuploid blastocysts (Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.257 and p = 0.47, respectively; Figure 2A). Notably, significantly heterogeneous mRNA expression of TERT was observed in aneuploid compared to other blastocysts (Bartlett’s test, p < 0.01). Furthermore, we did not find a strong correlation between telomere length and TERT mRNA abundance (r = 0.103, p = 0.265; Figure 2B).
As TERT mRNA abundance does not always reflect the encoded TERT protein level, IF staining was performed on whole blastocysts to identify the location and expression of the TERT protein. Specific staining for the TERT protein was imaged in all tested blastocysts (Figure 3), whether euploid or aneuploid. Intriguingly, strong anti-hTERT staining foci appeared on condensed chromatin in dividing cells (Figure 3). These results suggest that telomerase genes are actively transcribed and translated in human embryos at the blastocyst stage, regardless of ploidy status.

3.3. Comparison of Telomere Length and Telomerase Gene Expression in Aneuploid Blastocysts with Whole Chromosome Gain and Loss

Next, we analyzed whether telomere length or telomerase gene expression differed in aneuploid embryos exhibiting chromosome gain vs. loss. Telomere length and telomerase gene expression did not differ between 42 blastocysts with chromosome gain (≥47) and 35 blastocysts with chromosome loss (≤45) (p > 0.05, t test; Figure 4A). Telomere length and telomerase gene expression did not differ between trisomic (Trisomy 22, 20, 16, 11, 8, and 2) and monosomic blastocysts (Monosomy 22, 20, 16, 11, 8, and 2) (p > 0.05, t test; Figure 4B). Interestingly, aneuploid blastocysts with fewer chromosomes tended to have longer telomeres than those with more chromosomes (p = 0.072 in chromosome gain and loss and p = 0.075 in trisomy and monosomy; t test) (Table 2 and Figure 4). The parental age did not differ between blastocysts with chromosome loss vs. gain (Table 2).

3.4. Quantification of Telomerase Activity

Telomerase activity is directly involved in telomeric DNA synthesis, so we measured telomerase activity using qPCR in twenty aneuploid blastocysts and compared them to a telomerase positive control. All tested embryos had much smaller Cq Value compared to the inactivated telomerase positive sample (Supplementary Table S2), consistent with active telomerase in all human embryos at the blastocyst stage. Telomerase activity in euploid and mosaic blastocysts was significantly higher than in telomerase positive controls (6.36 ± 0.84 vs. 1.01 ± 0.12, p = 0.001 and 5.78 ± 2.39 vs. 1.01 ± 0.12, p = 0.02, respectively, by t test; Figure 5). Aneuploid blastocysts did not show significantly higher telomerase activity than the telomerase positive control (2.65 ± 1.40 vs. 1.01 ± 0.12, p = 0.058, t test; Figure 5). Strikingly, aneuploid blastocysts have decreased telomerase activity compared to euploid and mosaic blastocysts (2.65 ± 1.40 vs. 6.36 ± 0.84, p = 0.001 and 2.65 ± 1.40 vs. 5.78 ± 2.39, p = 0.001, respectively, by t test; Figure 5), though telomerase activity did not differ between mosaic and euploid blastocysts (6.36 ± 0.84 vs. 5.78 ± 2.39, p = 0.78; t test; Figure 5). These results suggest that telomerase remains active at the blastocyst stage, but at decreased levels in aneuploid blastocysts.

4. Discussion

Here, we report longer telomere length in aneuploid compared to euploid human blastocysts, even in sibling blastocysts. Unlike other studies [20,21] measuring telomere length in single cells or few cells from trophectoderm (TE) biopsy, we measured telomere length in whole embryos, which provide sufficient cells to avoid whole genomic amplification (WGA). Presumably, our data provide a more accurate estimate of telomere length, and involve less technical artifact. Moreover, differences may exist in telomere lengths between inner cell mass (ICM) and TE, limiting the generalizability of telomere length measurement in TE biopsies. For example, in mouse, the ICM has longer telomeres than TE, while in cattle the opposite is true [25,26]. Whether telomere length differs between ICM and TE in human blastocysts is unknown, but such differences may help to explain how our findings, carried out on whole embryos, conflict with previous studies on TE cells or blastomeres.
Our data demonstrate that aneuploid blastocysts have longer telomeres but decreased telomerase activity compared to euploid or mosaic/segmental human blastocysts. The canonical function of telomerase is to maintain telomere ends by addition of the telomeric DNA repeat TTAGGG [27]. The lack of telomerase activity leads to progressive telomere erosion in dividing cells. In the present study, we analyzed the association of telomere length with telomerase gene expression in human blastocysts and found that longer telomeres in aneuploid blastocysts are accompanied by a higher level of telomerase TERT mRNA expression in aneuploid compared to euploid blastocysts, but lower telomerase activity. Studies demonstrate that telomerase gene expression does not always parallel telomerase activity [28,29]. The measurement of telomerase activity in individual blastocysts showed much lower telomerase activity in aneuploid compared with euploid blastocysts, which suggests that telomerase activity is down-regulated in aneuploid blastocysts. Intriguingly, aneuploid embryos maintain a robust telomere reserve despite diminished telomerase activity. We cannot rule out the possibility that robust telomere reserve may enable some aneuploid embryos to escape cellular senescence and death during preimplantation development. Previous studies [8,20,30] demonstrated that telomere length is reset between the cleavage and blastocyst stages of development. We previously demonstrated this robust (kilobase per cell cycle) telomere elongation during early mouse embryo development, at a stage when telomerase activity remains minimal [8], and this elongation is recombination-based alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT). Telomere lengthening occurred even in a telomerase null mouse, suggesting that telomere length in embryos is set during the cleavage stage and only maintained by telomerase. Recombination-based ALT resets the short telomeres found in oocytes and zygotes, but at the cost of increased genomic instability which accompanies sister chromatid exchange.
Our findings of increased telomerase gene expression and protein staining in the setting of decreased telomerase activity in aneuploid blastocysts raise the question of non-canonical functions for TERT during early development. A number of non-canonical functions of the telomerase catalytic component TERT have been reported in cultured cells, including the enhancement of cellular proliferation and survival, transcriptional regulation, protection from DNA damage, and regulation of mitochondrial function [5,31,32,33]. Intriguingly, condensed anti-hTERT staining foci localized to compressed chromatids in both euploid and aneuploid blastocysts, which suggests that TERT may be involved in mitotic cell division during human embryo development. This finding further supports telomerase-independent roles for TERT, as previously suggested [34]. Moreover, since telomere elongation is occurring in embryos with marked chromosome abnormalities, DNA damage, e.g., that resulting from aging, may promote TERT expression to enable these embryos to escape senescence [35,36]. Such phenomena and potential mechanisms merit further investigation.
The relative telomere length measured by qPCR is calculated by a ratio of the amount of telomere amplification product to that of a reference gene [37]. Therefore, extra chromosomes in aneuploid cells would be expected to increase not only the total amount of telomere but also the reference gene amplification product, so the ratio would remain unchanged. This may explain why our data show that average telomere length in embryos does not differ between embryos with a gain vs. loss of chromosome(s). It is well known that the expression of a substantial number of genes directly correlates with gene dose [38]; however, gene expression levels often do not reflect the actual gene copy number due to the dosage compensation and the global re-balancing of aneuploid genomes [39]. Here, we also found that elevated telomerase gene expression in aneuploid blastocysts was not affected by extra chromosome gain or loss. The TERT gene is located on chromosome 5, and our sample had only two embryos with a gain of chromosome 5 and none with a loss of chromosome 5 (Supplementary Table S1). Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that variation in the copy number of chromosome 5 could impact telomerase gene expression or telomere length.
These findings, for the first time, report that human blastocysts with single chromosome mosaicism or segmental abnormalities present indistinguishable telomere lengths, telomerase gene expression, and telomerase activity compared with euploid blastocysts. These findings indicate the similarity of developmental patterns between euploid and mosaic or segmental blastocysts, which could explain why mosaic and segmental embryo transfers result in healthy infants undergoing IVF treatment [40,41]. Hence, our work provides direct molecular evidence justifying the transfer of mosaic or segmental embryos in patients who have no other embryos.

5. Conclusions

Our study presents novel, quantitative data about telomere length, telomerase gene expression, and telomerase activity in human blastocysts. It demonstrates that there is a different landscape of telomere lengths and telomerase between euploid and aneuploid blastocysts, and it sheds light on the molecular mechanism underlying the survival of aneuploid blastocysts. Our findings are consistent with prior studies in mice showing that telomere length is reprogrammed by recombination at the early stages of embryonic development, and is maintained by telomerase during the later stages of preimplantation development, even in some aneuploid embryos. Robust TERT expression and telomere length maintenance in aneuploid human blastocysts may explain why extended in vitro culture alone is insufficient to cull out aneuploidy embryos during IVF.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14061200/s1, Table S1: Telomere length and telomerase gene expression in human blastocysts along with PGT-A diagnosis; Table S2: Relative Telomerase Activity in individual embryos with PGT-A diagnosis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.W., D.H.M. and D.L.K.; methodology, F.W., K.C. and A.W.; data analysis, F.W. and D.H.M.; resources, C.M., J.A.G. and D.L.K.; writing—original draft preparation, F.W. and K.C.; writing—review and editing, D.H.M., A.W., C.M., J.A.G. and D.L.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Roshan Trainee Research Fund provided by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of NYU Langone Health (protocol code S16-00154 and date of approval was from 12 April 2016 to present).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shay, J.W.; Wright, W.E. Telomeres and telomerase: Three decades of progress. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019, 20, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cong, Y.S.; Wright, W.E.; Shay, J.W. Human telomerase and its regulation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66, 407–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Min, J.; Wright, W.E.; Shay, J.W. Alternative lengthening of telomeres can be maintained by preferential elongation of lagging strands. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 2615–2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shay, J.W.; Reddel, R.R.; Wright, W.E. Cancer. Cancer and telomeres—An ALTernative to telomerase. Science 2012, 336, 1388–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Smith, L.L.; Coller, H.A.; Roberts, J.M. Telomerase modulates expression of growth-controlling genes and enhances cell proliferation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003, 5, 474–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ozturk, S.; Sozen, B.; Demir, N. Telomere length and telomerase activity during oocyte maturation and early embryo development in mammalian species. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 20, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tardat, M.; Dejardin, J. Telomere chromatin establishment and its maintenance during mammalian development. Chromosoma 2018, 127, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Liu, L.; Bailey, S.M.; Okuka, M.; Munoz, P.; Li, C.; Zhou, L.; Wu, C.; Czerwiec, E.; Sandler, L.; Seyfang, A.; et al. Telomere lengthening early in development. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 1436–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wright, D.L.; Jones, E.L.; Mayer, J.F.; Oehninger, S.; Gibbons, W.E.; Lanzendorf, S.E. Characterization of telomerase activity in the human oocyte and preimplantation embryo. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2001, 7, 947–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Murnane, J.P. Telomere dysfunction and chromosome instability. Mutat. Res. 2012, 730, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, L.; Blasco, M.; Trimarchi, J.; Keefe, D. An essential role for functional telomeres in mouse germ cells during fertilization and early development. Dev. Biol. 2002, 249, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, H.W.; Blasco, M.A.; Gottlieb, G.J.; Horner, J.W., 2nd; Greider, C.W.; DePinho, R.A. Essential role of mouse telomerase in highly proliferative organs. Nature 1998, 392, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hanson, B.M.; Tao, X.; Zhan, Y.; Kim, J.G.; Klimczak, A.M.; Herlihy, N.S.; Scott, R.T., Jr.; Seli, E. Shorter telomere length of white blood cells is associated with higher rates of aneuploidy among infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 2021, 115, 957–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rocca, M.S.; Foresta, C.; Ferlin, A. Telomere length: Lights and shadows on their role in human reproduction. Biol. Reprod. 2019, 100, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Savage, S.A. Beginning at the ends: Telomeres and human disease. F1000Res 2018, 7, F1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Robinson, L.G., Jr.; Pimentel, R.; Wang, F.; Kramer, Y.G.; Gonullu, D.C.; Agarwal, S.; Navarro, P.A.; McCulloh, D.; Keefe, D.L. Impaired reproductive function and fertility preservation in a woman with a dyskeratosis congenita. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2020, 37, 1221–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wiener-Megnazi, Z.; Auslender, R.; Dirnfeld, M. Advanced paternal age and reproductive outcome. Asian J. Androl. 2012, 14, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Antunes, D.M.F.; Kalmbach, K.H.; Wang, F.; Dracxler, R.C.; Seth-Smith, M.L.; Kramer, Y.; Buldo-Licciardi, J.; Kohlrausch, F.B.; Keefe, D.L. A single-cell assay for telomere DNA content shows increasing telomere length heterogeneity, as well as increasing mean telomere length in human spermatozoa with advancing age. J. Assist. Reprod. Gen. 2015, 32, 1685–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Turner, K.; Lynch, C.; Rouse, H.; Vasu, V.; Griffin, D.K. Direct Single-Cell Analysis of Human Polar Bodies and Cleavage-Stage Embryos Reveals No Evidence of the Telomere Theory of Reproductive Ageing in Relation to Aneuploidy Generation. Cells 2019, 8, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Treff, N.R.; Su, J.; Taylor, D.; Scott, R.T., Jr. Telomere DNA deficiency is associated with development of human embryonic aneuploidy. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mania, A.; Mantzouratou, A.; Delhanty, J.D.; Baio, G.; Serhal, P.; Sengupta, S.B. Telomere length in human blastocysts. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2014, 28, 624–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Macaulay, I.C.; Teng, M.J.; Haerty, W.; Kumar, P.; Ponting, C.P.; Voet, T. Separation and parallel sequencing of the genomes and transcriptomes of single cells using G&T-seq. Nat. Protoc. 2016, 11, 2081–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cawthon, R.M. Telomere measurement by quantitative PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Macia, A.; Widmann, T.J.; Heras, S.R.; Ayllon, V.; Sanchez, L.; Benkaddour-Boumzaouad, M.; Munoz-Lopez, M.; Rubio, A.; Amador-Cubero, S.; Blanco-Jimenez, E.; et al. Engineered LINE-1 retrotransposition in nondividing human neurons. Genome Res. 2017, 27, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Iqbal, K.; Kues, W.A.; Baulain, U.; Garrels, W.; Herrmann, D.; Niemann, H. Species-specific telomere length differences between blastocyst cell compartments and ectopic telomere extension in early bovine embryos by human telomerase reverse transcriptase. Biol. Reprod. 2011, 84, 723–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Varela, E.; Schneider, R.P.; Ortega, S.; Blasco, M.A. Different telomere-length dynamics at the inner cell mass versus established embryonic stem (ES) cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 15207–15212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yuan, X.; Larsson, C.; Xu, D. Mechanisms underlying the activation of TERT transcription and telomerase activity in human cancer: Old actors and new players. Oncogene 2019, 38, 6172–6183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Beck, S.; Jin, X.; Sohn, Y.W.; Kim, J.K.; Kim, S.H.; Yin, J.; Pian, X.; Kim, S.C.; Nam, D.H.; Choi, Y.J.; et al. Telomerase activity-independent function of TERT allows glioma cells to attain cancer stem cell characteristics by inducing EGFR expression. Mol. Cells 2011, 31, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Klapper, W.; Shin, T.; Mattson, M.P. Differential regulation of telomerase activity and TERT expression during brain development in mice. J. Neurosci. Res. 2001, 64, 252–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schaetzlein, S.; Lucas-Hahn, A.; Lemme, E.; Kues, W.A.; Dorsch, M.; Manns, M.P.; Niemann, H.; Rudolph, K.L. Telomere length is reset during early mammalian embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 8034–8038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Choi, J.K.; Southworth, L.K.; Sarin, K.Y.; Venteicher, A.S.; Ma, W.X.; Chang, W.; Cheung, P.; Jun, S.H.; Artandi, M.K.; Shah, N.; et al. TERT promotes epithelial proliferation through transcriptional control of a Myc- and Wnt-related developmental program. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4, e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nitta, E.; Yamashita, M.; Hosokawa, K.; Xian, M.J.; Takubo, K.; Arai, F.; Nakada, S.; Suda, T. Telomerase reverse transcriptase protects ATM-deficient hematopoietic stem cells from ROS-induced apoptosis through a telomere-independent mechanism. Blood 2011, 117, 4169–4180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ghosh, A.; Saginc, G.; Leow, S.C.; Khattar, E.; Shin, E.M.; Yan, T.D.; Wong, M.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Li, G.L.; Sung, W.K.; et al. Telomerase directly regulates NF-kappa B-dependent transcription. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14, 1270–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cao, Y.; Li, H.; Deb, S.; Liu, J.P. TERT regulates cell survival independent of telomerase enzymatic activity. Oncogene 2002, 21, 3130–3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Menezo, Y.; Dale, B.; Cohen, M. DNA damage and repair in human oocytes and embryos: A review. Zygote 2010, 18, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cimadomo, D.; Fabozzi, G.; Vaiarelli, A.; Ubaldi, N.; Ubaldi, F.M.; Rienzi, L. Impact of Maternal Age on Oocyte and Embryo Competence. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Montpetit, A.J.; Alhareeri, A.A.; Montpetit, M.; Starkweather, A.R.; Elmore, L.W.; Filler, K.; Mohanraj, L.; Burton, C.W.; Menzies, V.S.; Lyon, D.E.; et al. Telomere length: A review of methods for measurement. Nurs. Res. 2014, 63, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, Y.; Oliver, B. Dosage compensation goes global. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2007, 17, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kojima, S.; Cimini, D. Aneuploidy and gene expression: Is there dosage compensation? Epigenomics 2019, 11, 1827–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhang, L.; Wei, D.M.; Zhu, Y.T.; Gao, Y.; Yan, J.H.; Chen, Z.J. Rates of live birth after mosaic embryo transfer compared with euploid embryo transfer. J. Assist. Reprod. Gen. 2019, 36, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kahraman, S.; Cetinkaya, M.; Yuksel, B.; Yesil, M.; Cetinkaya, C.P. The birth of a baby with mosaicism resulting from a known mosaic embryo transfer: A case report. Hum. Reprod. 2020, 35, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 14 01200 g001 550
Figure 1. Relative telomere length in human blastocysts. (A) Comparison of average telomere lengths in human blastocysts grouped by the number of chromosomal errors. (B) Multiple comparison of average telomere length in aneuploidy, euploidy, and segmental/mosaic embryos. (C) Comparison of average telomere length between euploidy and sibling-aneuploidy from three subjects. Box bars depict from minimum to maximum with mean. (D) Association of telomere length in aneuploid blastocysts with parental age. The orange dots represent maternal age, and the blue dots represent paternal age.
Figure 1. Relative telomere length in human blastocysts. (A) Comparison of average telomere lengths in human blastocysts grouped by the number of chromosomal errors. (B) Multiple comparison of average telomere length in aneuploidy, euploidy, and segmental/mosaic embryos. (C) Comparison of average telomere length between euploidy and sibling-aneuploidy from three subjects. Box bars depict from minimum to maximum with mean. (D) Association of telomere length in aneuploid blastocysts with parental age. The orange dots represent maternal age, and the blue dots represent paternal age.
Genes 14 01200 g001
Genes 14 01200 g002 550
Figure 2. Telomerase TERT gene expression in human blastocysts by real-time PCR. (A) Comparison of TERT mRNA expression level. Box bars depict from minimum to maximum with median. (B) Association of telomere length with relative TERT gene expression by Spearman’s Rank Correlation analysis.
Figure 2. Telomerase TERT gene expression in human blastocysts by real-time PCR. (A) Comparison of TERT mRNA expression level. Box bars depict from minimum to maximum with median. (B) Association of telomere length with relative TERT gene expression by Spearman’s Rank Correlation analysis.
Genes 14 01200 g002
Genes 14 01200 g003 550
Figure 3. Immunofluorescent staining with anti-hTERT antibody in human blastocysts. NC represents negative control embryo stained only with secondary antibody. Red arrows point at the dividing cells with condensed anti-hTERT staining foci.
Figure 3. Immunofluorescent staining with anti-hTERT antibody in human blastocysts. NC represents negative control embryo stained only with secondary antibody. Red arrows point at the dividing cells with condensed anti-hTERT staining foci.
Genes 14 01200 g003
Genes 14 01200 g004 550
Figure 4. Whole chromosome gain did not increase telomere length and telomerase gene TERT expression in human aneuploid blastocysts. (A) Comparison of telomere length and TERT mRNA expression level in aneuploidy between whole chromosome gain (chromosome number ≥ 47, N = 42) and loss (chromosome number ≤ 45, N = 35). (B) Comparison of telomere length and TERT mRNA expression level in aneuploidy between trisomy (N = 9) and monosomy (N = 12).
Figure 4. Whole chromosome gain did not increase telomere length and telomerase gene TERT expression in human aneuploid blastocysts. (A) Comparison of telomere length and TERT mRNA expression level in aneuploidy between whole chromosome gain (chromosome number ≥ 47, N = 42) and loss (chromosome number ≤ 45, N = 35). (B) Comparison of telomere length and TERT mRNA expression level in aneuploidy between trisomy (N = 9) and monosomy (N = 12).
Genes 14 01200 g004
Genes 14 01200 g005 550
Figure 5. Comparison of relative telomere activity in human blastocysts. Pos represents telomerase positive control sample supplied by the assay kit. p value was calculated by t test on the GraphPad Prism 9 platform. The box bar represents from the minimum to maximum with mean value.
Figure 5. Comparison of relative telomere activity in human blastocysts. Pos represents telomerase positive control sample supplied by the assay kit. p value was calculated by t test on the GraphPad Prism 9 platform. The box bar represents from the minimum to maximum with mean value.
Genes 14 01200 g005
Table
Table 1. Sequences of primers for telomeres in the study.
Table 1. Sequences of primers for telomeres in the study.
PrimerSequence
GAPDH-FTTC ACC ACC ATG GAG AAG GC
GAPDH-RCCC TTT TGG CTC CAC CCT
TERT-FAAA TGC GGC CCC TGT TTC T
TERT-RCAG TGC GTC TTG AGG AGC A
Telomere-FCGG TTT GTT TGG GTT TGG GTT TGG GTT TGG GTT TGG GTT
Telomere-RGGC TTG CCT TAC CCT TAC CCT TAC CCT TAC CCT TAC CCT
5S rDNA-FCTC GTC TGA TCT CGG AAG CTA AG
5S rDNA-RGCG GTC TCC CAT CCA AGT AC
Table
Table 2. Comparison of telomere length and telomerase gene expression in aneuploid blastocysts between chromosomal gain and loss.
Table 2. Comparison of telomere length and telomerase gene expression in aneuploid blastocysts between chromosomal gain and loss.
Chromosome Gain ≥ 47 (N = 42)Chromosome Loss ≤ 45 (N = 35)pTrisomy (N = 9)Monosomy (N = 12)p
Maternal age (y)
(Median (Minimum, Maximum])		41 (23, 45)38 (23, 45)0.5341 (23, 44)38 (23, 43)0.37
Paternal age (y)
(Median (Minimum, Maximum))		39 (27, 60)39 (29, 60)0.8639 (29, 60)36 (29, 60)0.45
Telomere length (Mean ± Std.)1.87 ± 1.122.46 ± 1.580.0721.72 ± 0.841.88 ± 0.670.075
TERT mRNA
(Median (25%–75%Percentile))		783
(448–1309)		879
(271–2160)		0.12621
(504–1926)		971
(256–1997)		0.062
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, F.; McCulloh, D.H.; Chan, K.; Wiltshire, A.; McCaffrey, C.; Grifo, J.A.; Keefe, D.L. The Landscape of Telomere Length and Telomerase in Human Embryos at Blastocyst Stage. Genes 2023, 14, 1200. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061200

AMA Style

Wang F, McCulloh DH, Chan K, Wiltshire A, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA, Keefe DL. The Landscape of Telomere Length and Telomerase in Human Embryos at Blastocyst Stage. Genes. 2023; 14(6):1200. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061200

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Fang, David H. McCulloh, Kasey Chan, Ashley Wiltshire, Caroline McCaffrey, James A. Grifo, and David L. Keefe. 2023. "The Landscape of Telomere Length and Telomerase in Human Embryos at Blastocyst Stage" Genes 14, no. 6: 1200. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061200

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop