Next Article in Journal
Comparative Genome-Wide Analysis of MicroRNAs and Their Target Genes in Roots of Contrasting Indica Rice Cultivars under Reproductive-Stage Drought
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Cloning of Toll-like Receptor 2 and 4 (SpTLR2, 4) and Expression of TLR-Related Genes from Schizothorax prenanti after Poly (I:C) Stimulation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Viral Promoters for Transgene Expression and of the Effect of 5′-UTRs on Alternative Translational Start Sites in Chlamydomonas
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 14
Issue 7
10.3390/genes14071389
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cell Type-Specific Promoters of Volvox carteri for Molecular Cell Biology Studies

by
Benjamin von der Heyde
†,
Eva Laura von der Heyde
† and
Armin Hallmann
*
Department of Cellular and Developmental Biology of Plants, University of Bielefeld, Universitätsstr. 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2023, 14(7), 1389; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071389
Submission received: 12 June 2023 / Accepted: 26 June 2023 / Published: 1 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Engineering of Microalgae)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The multicellular green alga Volvox carteri has emerged as a valuable model organism for investigating various aspects of multicellularity and cellular differentiation, photoreception and phototaxis, cell division, biogenesis of the extracellular matrix and morphogenetic movements. While a range of molecular tools and bioinformatics resources have been made available for exploring these topics, the establishment of cell type-specific promoters in V. carteri has not been achieved so far. Therefore, here, we conducted a thorough screening of transcriptome data from RNA sequencing analyses of V. carteri in order to identify potential cell type-specific promoters. Eventually, we chose two putative strong and cell type-specific promoters, with one exhibiting specific expression in reproductive cells (gonidia), the PCY1 promoter, and the other in somatic cells, the PFP promoter. After cloning both promoter regions, they were introduced upstream of a luciferase reporter gene. By using particle bombardment, the DNA constructs were stably integrated into the genome of V. carteri. The results of the expression analyses, which were conducted at both the transcript and protein levels, demonstrated that the two promoters drive cell type-specific expression in their respective target cell types. Transformants with considerably diverse expression levels of the chimeric genes were identifiable. In conclusion, the screening and analysis of transcriptome data from RNA sequencing allowed for the identification of potential cell type-specific promoters in V. carteri. Reporter gene constructs demonstrated the actual usability of two promoters. The investigated PCY1 and PFP promoters were proven to be potent molecular tools for genetic engineering in V. carteri.

1. Introduction

Volvocine algae, a subgroup of the chlorophytes (green algae), span the full range of organismal complexity, from unicellular organisms, such as Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, to colonial organisms to multicellular organisms with a full germ–soma division of labor, such as Volvox carteri. Volvox is basically the simplest type of differentiated multicellular organism, as it has only two cell types: approximately 2000 small biflagellate terminally differentiated somatic cells, which form a monolayer at the surface of a sphere, and approximately 16 large flagella-less reproductive cells (gonidia), which lie just below the sheet of somatic cells (Figure 1). All cells are embedded in a transparent glycoprotein-rich extracellular matrix that holds the cells in place and can constitute up to 99% of the volume of the sphere. The alga is able to sense light stimuli and respond by changing its swimming behavior, an ability that is essential for optimizing photosynthesis. Most of the time, Volvox reproduces asexually, but when confronted with unpleasant conditions, such as a drying up pond, it switches to sexual reproduction and produces zygotes that are able to withstand harsh conditions [1,2].
For experimental studies of cell differentiation, Volvox offers the advantage that the different cell types can be mechanically separated from each other. The pure cell types can then be analyzed separately using molecular biological or biochemical methods for comparative studies [3,4,5].
In the last decades, the green microalga V. carteri has emerged as a useful model organism for studying aspects of multicellularity and cellular differentiation [2,6,7,8,9], photoreception and phototaxis [10,11,12,13,14], cell division [15,16], biogenesis of the extracellular matrix [17,18,19,20,21], and morphogenetic movements [1,22,23,24,25,26,27].
To answer a wide variety of questions in these subject areas, a broad range of molecular tools and bioinformatics resources have already been established for Volvox and also for its relatives.
The genomes of V. carteri [28] and the seven other volvocine algae, namely C. reinhardtii [29,30,31], Tetrabaena socialis [32], Gonium pectorale [33], Astrephomene gubernaculifera [34], Pandorina morum [35], Yamagishiella unicocca [35] and Eudorina sp. [35], are available at the plant genomics resource phytozome 13 [36] and/or GenBank [37,38,39]. These genomes offer a genome-wide comparison and analysis of differences between V. carteri and less complex volvocine species.
The transcriptome of V. carteri has been investigated with RNA-sequencing analyses focusing on protein-coding gene expression [4,5] and the micro-RNA repertoire [40]. There are also transcriptome-wide studies on (cell type-specific) alternative splicing [41,42].
For genetic-engineering experiments with V. carteri, stable nuclear transformation was established using the particle bombardment or biolistics technique [43]. Integration into the nuclear genome is mostly by illegitimate recombination, resulting in ectopic integration of introduced DNA, but homologous recombination is also feasible [44]. Different selectable marker genes for auxotrophic or antibiotic selection can be efficiently co-transformed with non-selectable genes of interest [43,45,46,47,48,49,50]. There are also several reporter genes for V. carteri that code for fluorescent [10,51,52], light-producing [53], and chromogenic reporter proteins [47]. For in vivo localization studies of key proteins, the corresponding genes are routinely fused to the reporter gene yfp, and the fluorescent fusion proteins are located in transformants, using confocal laser scanning microscopy [10,15,20,54]. Transposons of V. carteri can be used for transposon mutagenesis to randomly generate mutant phenotypes and then use the transposon sequence in these mutants to identify the insertion site [55,56,57]. Selective knockdown of target genes using RNA interference is also feasible [58]. Furthermore, endogenous genes can be edited or knocked out by CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis [59].
In a wide variety of genetic-engineering applications, the availability of well-defined endogenous promoters is crucial. Depending on the application; the use of strong, intermediate, or weak promoters; and whether it is constitutive or inducible, developmental-stage-specific or stage-enriched, or cell type- or tissue-specific promoters are required. Combinations of these are also needed, such as inducible weak or cell type-specific strong promoters. For some applications, promoters have already been identified and tested in V. carteri. In terms of inducibility, there are established promoters inducible by the V. carteri sex-inducer (pherophorin-S promoter) [60], nitrate (nitA promoter) [53], sulfur deprivation (arylsulfatase promoter) [47,61], and heat shock (hsp70A promoter) [49]. Strong constitutive promoters are available with the rbcS3 promoter [49], the β-tubulin promoter [15,44,60], and the Lhcbm1 promoter [10,15]. Another established promoter is the isg promoter, which is specific for the developmental stage of embryonic inversion [47]. To date, however, no cell type-specific promoters have been established for molecular cell biology studies in V. carteri. This is quite astonishing, as a major reason for selecting Volvox as a model system is that this simple multicellular alga shows a complete germ–soma division of labor, and even approximately 54% of all genes show cell type-specific expression [4]. It is then obvious to look for the molecular differences between the two cell types, for which cell type-specific promoters would be a helpful tool. By using such cell type-specific promoters, it is possible to perform cell type-specific labelling, knockdown, knockout, or overexpression of a gene of interest.
To make cell type-specific promoters usable in V. carteri, we screened transcriptome data from RNA-sequencing analyses and finally selected two supposed strong and cell type-specific promoters—one for gonidia-specific expression and one for specific expression in somatic cells. Both promoter regions were cloned and then placed in front of a reporter gene, the G-Luc gene, which encodes a luciferase. The corresponding DNA constructs were stably integrated into the genome of V. carteri transformants by particle bombardment. Expression analyses at both the transcript and protein levels showed that the two promoters indeed mediate cell type-specific expression in the respective target cell type, with expression strengths varying between different transformants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. MA-Plot (Bland–Altman Plot)

The analysis of cell type-specific expression was based on RNA-Seq data obtained from a previous whole-transcriptome analysis for V. carteri [4]. Mapping, data analysis, and bioinformatics are described there. The earlier study involved synchronized Volvox algae at the developmental stage just before the onset of embryogenesis, and the two cell types of Volvox were mechanically separated from each other and analyzed independently. The requirements for the determination of expression levels and cell type-specific expression were as previously described [4]. To analyze and visualize the expression data, we used the short-read mapping analysis platform ReadXplorer 2.2.3 [62], which also includes the R package DESeq [63,64,65]. DESeq was used for count data normalization and the calculation of mean values (baseMean) and fold differences in expression. Differential expression was tested using DEseq calculations [63] and Benjamini–Hochberg multiple testing adjustment [66], with a false discovery rate (FDR) of q = 0.1. An average baseMean expression value greater than 12.5 was sufficient for robust expression analysis (cutoff at 12.5).

2.2. Strains and Culture Conditions

V. carteri f. nagariensis strain Eve10 is a female wild-type strain from Japan that has been previously described [67,68,69]. In transformation experiments, the nitrate reductase-deficient (nitA−) strain TNit-1013 [10], a descendant of Eve10, was used as the recipient strain. Since the recipient strain cannot utilize nitrate as a nitrogen source, it was grown in standard Volvox medium [70] supplemented with 1 mM ammonium chloride (NH4Cl). Transformed Volvox algae that had the nitrate reductase gene complemented were grown in standard Volvox medium without ammonium chloride. All cultures were grown at 28 °C in a cycle of 8 h darkness, followed by 16 h of cool fluorescent white light [71] at an average of approximately 100 μmol photons m−2 s−1 photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). The Volvox algae were cultured in either glass tubes with caps allowing for gas exchange or in Fernbach flasks, which were aerated with approximately 50 cm3 sterile air/min.

2.3. PCR Amplification of DNA Fragments for Vector Construction

The extraction of genomic DNA of the wild-type V. carteri strain Eve10 was as previously described [72]. To amplify genomic DNA fragments containing promoter and terminator regions, PCR reactions were performed on a Mastercycler Gradient PCR thermal cycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), using the genomic DNA of strain Eve10 as a template and specific oligonucleotide primers. Similarly, other components for vector construction were generated using plasmids as templates. Additional artificial restriction sites were previously added to the 5′ ends of the primers to facilitate the sequential connection of all DNA fragments during vector construction. The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 98 °C for 2 min, followed by 35–40 cycles of 98 °C for 30 s, 55–60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30–60 s; the final elongation step was at 72 °C for 7 min. PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and purified from the gel, using the GeneJET Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA) according to the manufacturer’s manual.

2.4. Construction of Vectors for Cell Type-Specific Expression of Luciferase

To construct the expression vector pPCY1-Luc, four fragments were required: the PCY1 promoter region (Vocar.0015s0197), the G. princeps luciferase gene (G-Luc) [73], the Lhcbm1 terminator region (Vocar.0001s0479), and the pBluescript II SK (-) vector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) as a backbone. PCY1, G-Luc, and Lhcbm1 fragments were generated by PCR, as described above. To amplify the coding sequence of G-Luc, a plasmid, pPsaD-GLuc, was used as a template [73]. The G-Luc on this plasmid was previously adapted to the nuclear codon usage of C. reinhardtii [73]. The three PCR fragments with artificial restriction sites at their ends were sequentially inserted into the vector backbone. The first inserted fragment (1.3 kb) contained the promoter region of the PCY1 gene with the 5′UTR of the gene also included (artificial XhoI to artificial ClaI). The second fragment contained the 0.6 kb G-Luc coding sequence (artificial ClaI to artificial XbaI). The third fragment contained the 0.3 kb terminator region of the V. carteri Lhcbm1 gene (artificial XbaI to artificial NotI).
To construct the expression vector pPFP-Luc, the same procedure as for pPCY1-Luc was followed, except that the promoter region and the 5′UTR, a fragment of 1.2 kb, in this case came from the V. carteri PFP gene (Vocar.0032s0153). In pPFP-Luc, the G. princeps G-Luc gene is under control of the PFP promoter region and has the Lhcbm1 terminator region.

2.5. Stable Nuclear Transformation of V. carteri by Particle Bombardment

A logarithmically growing culture of V. carteri strain TNit-1013 was harvested via filtration. The stable nuclear transformation of strain TNit-1013 was carried out as previously described [43] by using a Biolistic PDS-1000/He (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) particle gun [74]. Gold microprojectiles (1.0 µm in diameter, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) were coated according to earlier protocols [75,76]. Algae were co-bombarded with the selectable marker vector pVcNR15 [77] and a non-selectable vector, either pPCY1-Luc or pPFP-Luc. The plasmid pVcNR15 carries the intact V. carteri nitA gene complementing the stable nitA-mutation of strain TNit-1013. The functional nitA version on plasmid pVcNR15 contains only the first intron of nitA; all others were deliberately omitted. This makes the plasmid much smaller than with all introns, and once it is genomically integrated, this shorter version of nitA can be easily distinguished from endogenous nitA by PCR. To select transformants, the nitrogen source in the Volvox medium was switched from ammonium to nitrate. For this purpose, the bombarded algae were distributed on Petri dishes (9 cm diameter) with standard medium containing nitrate as the sole nitrogen source. From the sixth day on after particle bombardment, algae cultures were screened for green and living transformants (nitA+) in a background of numerous bleaching, unaltered organisms (nitA−) by dark-field stereomicroscopy (MZ16A, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Identified transformants were transferred to fresh selective medium for further cultivation.

2.6. Genomic PCR

Genomic DNA of potential V. carteri transformants was isolated as described above. Genomic integration of nitA was investigated by PCR amplification of a nitA fragment, using genomic DNA as a template and the oligonucleotide primers 5′-TGCGAGAGGAGCTTGATGAGC and 5′-CCTCCGAGAGTCGGATCGC. Similarly, the genomic integration of G-Luc was investigated by use of the oligonucleotide primers 5′-GGATGTCCACGATGGCCTCG and 5′-ATCTAGATTACGTATCGTCGCCGCCG. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 98 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 60 s; the final elongation step was at 72 °C for 7 min. Amplified PCR fragments were analyzed by electrophoresis, using 1.5 % agarose gels and a GeneRuler 100 bp DNA ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA).

2.7. Fast Luciferase Screening Assay

For the large-scale phenotypic screening of transformants, 2 mL of a dense algal culture was concentrated on a 100 µm nylon screen and resuspended in 400 µL of assay buffer (0.1 M K2HPO4 pH 7.6, 0.5 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) [73]. The algae cells were then disrupted by 15 s of ultrasound sonication, using a Sonopuls HD2070 sonicator (Bandelin Electronic, Berlin, Germany) at 70% power, under cooling with ice. Based on the measured chlorophyll concentration of each sample, the samples were equalized for lysate concentration by adding assay buffer. In a black 96-well polystyrene plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA), 200 µL of each lysate was added to 50 µL of 10 µM coelenterazine (Fluka, Neu-Ulm, Germany) in assay buffer, using a multichannel pipette. Chemiluminescence was detected with a ChemiDoc MP chemiluminescence imager (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA) and quantified using FIJI (ImageJ 1.51w) [78]. To document the uniformly adjusted lysate concentration of all samples based on their chlorophyll content, brightfield images were taken using a Nikon D200 camera.

2.8. Separation of the Cell Types of V. carteri

One liter of a V. carteri culture containing approximately 10,000 synchronously grown algae at the developmental stage shortly before onset of cell divisions was harvested on a 100 µm nylon screen. The concentrated algae were disrupted without lysing the cells, using a Dounce homogenizer with a tight-fitting pestle. The resulting suspension was transferred to the 100 µm nylon screen and washed with Volvox standard medium, allowing for the separation of soma sheets from gonidia: soma sheets are retained by the nylon screen while the gonidia pass through the screen. However, both fractions are not yet completely sorted then. The gonidia fraction from the flow-through was concentrated on a 10 µm nylon screen. To separate the gonidia from the remaining cell debris and singled somatic cells, the concentrated flow-through was transferred to a 50 mL Falcon tube that was filled up with Volvox standard medium and then centrifuged at 500× g for 2 min. The pelleted gonidia were then subjected to this washing process a second time. The resulting pellet was transferred to a 1.5 mL tube, 1 mL of medium was added, and the cell suspension was centrifuged at 500× g for 90 s. The supernatant liquid was then removed, and the pure gonidia in the pellet were brought to a final volume of 500 µL. The soma sheets that remained on the 100 µm nylon screen during the initial filtration also had to be cleared of individual cells of the other cell type. As some gonidia are tightly bound to the soma sheets, the soma sheet fraction was intensively treated with the Dounce homogenizer and transferred again to the 100 µm nylon screen and washed thoroughly. The retained soma sheets were transferred to a 1.5 mL tube, 1 mL of medium was added, and the cell suspension was centrifuged at 500× g for 5 min. The supernatant liquid was then removed, and the pure soma sheets in the pellet were brought to a final volume of 500 µL.

2.9. Isolation of Total RNA from Separated Cell Types

The homogenization and lysis of cells of soma sheet or gonidia suspensions were performed using a Precellys Evolution Homogenizer (Bertin Technologies, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France). To this end, 250 µL fractions of each of the cell suspensions were transferred to 2 mL screw-cap tubes; ten 1 mm zirconia/silica beads (BioSpec Products, Bartlesville, OK, USA) and 1 mL phenol-based TRI reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were added to each fraction; the samples were placed in the homogenizer; and cells were then lysed in 3 cycles of 20 s at 10,000 rpm, with a 10 s cooling period between cycles. For the extraction of total RNA, 300 μL of trichloromethane was added to the resulting homogenate. RNA precipitation and RNA purification were performed as previously described [41,75,76,79]. RNA quality and quantity were checked by agarose gel electrophoresis and UV photometry, using a Nanophotometer UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Implen, Munich, Germany).

2.10. Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR

The SensiFAST SYBR No-Rox One-Step Kit (Bioline, Memphis, TN, USA) and a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) were used for real-time RNA quantification. All real-time RT-PCR experiments were carried out in three biological replicates with technical triplicates. For the amplification of a 119 bp fragment of the G-Luc cDNA, the specific primers were 5′-GGATGTCCACGATGGCCTCG and 5′-CCTGAGCCACATCAAGTGCAC; and for the amplification of a 118 bp fragment of the tbpA cDNA, the specific primers were 5′-GTAGTGGCTACTGTGAATCTGG and 5′-GCTCTCTAATACGCATAATGACG. The tbpA gene (Vocar.0016s0293) has generally been established as a reference gene for quantitative gene expression studies [80] and, in particular, has proven to be a reference gene for comparing the two cell types of V. carteri [81]. The temperature conditions in the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System were as follows: reverse transcription was at 45 °C for 20 min, followed by polymerase activation at 95 °C for 2 min and 40 cycles of DNA amplification at 95 °C for 7 s, 55 °C for 12 s, and 72 °C for 7 s. Melting curves were recorded to check for the amplification of a single product. Melting curves were generated by heating from 60 to 90 °C, with 1 °C increments per 10 s. The final products of all real-time RT-PCR reactions were visualized using agarose gel electrophoresis to verify amplification of products of correct size. The relative expression level was calculated using the 2−ΔCt method [82,83].

2.11. Quantification of Luciferase Activity in Separated Cell Types

As a measure of PCY1 and PFP promoter activity in Volvox transformants, luciferase activity was quantified separately for each cell type. For this purpose, algae cultures containing approximately 10 spheroids per mL were harvested, and the two cell types were mechanically separated from each other. A volume of 250 µL of the obtained soma sheet or gonidia suspension was mixed with 350 µL sample buffer (1.5 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.8, 1 mM EDTA) [73]. The cells were then disrupted by 15 s of sonication, using a Sonopuls HD2070 sonicator (Bandelin Electronic, Berlin, Germany) at 70% power, under cooling with ice. The resulting lysates were fractionated in 300 µL aliquots, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −70 °C for at least 30 min and at most 24 h before further processing. The lysates were thawed on ice in the dark and centrifuged at 20,000× g for 5 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were diluted 1:100 with sample buffer, which was pre-chilled to 4 °C, and then measured in technical triplicates. For each measurement, twenty microliters of each of the diluted supernatants was mixed with 125 μL of assay buffer (0.1 M K2HPO4 pH 7.6, 0.5 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA), which was tempered to 20 °C, and preincubated for 15 min at 20 °C in the dark. For the luciferase activity assay, fifty microliters of 0.01 mM coelenterazine (Fluka, Neu-Ulm, Germany) was added to the preincubated samples, and the relative brightness was determined in a Sirius-L tube luminometer (Berthold, Bad Wildbad, Germany). The relative brightness was recorded for 10 s, and the luciferase activity was output in relative light units (rlu). The luciferase activity of each sample was related to its chlorophyll concentration, which is proportional to the original cell density.

2.12. Determination of the Chlorophyll Concentration

The chlorophyll concentration of lysates was determined as a measure of culture density or cell density and used to normalize the recorded relative brightness of the luciferase assay. For the determination of chlorophyll concentration, 200 μL thawed lysate was mixed with 800 μL of acetone and incubated for 45 min at 20 °C in the dark. After centrifugation at 16,000× g for 5 min, the absorption of the supernatant was measured at 647 nm and 663 nm in an UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Ultrospec 2100 Pro UV/Vis Spectrophotometer, GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). The chlorophyll content was determined as previously described [84].

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Suitable Genes with Strong Cell Type-Specific Expression

To identify suitable genes with promoters that could be used for the cell type-specific expression of any target gene in V. carteri, RNA sequencing data from a previous transcriptome analysis of separated cell types were used [4]. The two-dimensional MA-plot in Figure 2A is based on these expression data. Each dot shows both the absolute expression intensity of a given gene and the differences in expression of this gene between somatic cells and gonidia. The genes of particular interest for our candidate search are highlighted: genes that show both strong expression in general, i.e., lie as far to the right of the MA plot as possible, and show strong overexpression in either cell type, i.e., lie as close as possible to the upper or lower edge. As for overexpression in somatic cells, a group of candidate genes that fulfill these conditions is shown in Figure 2B. Similarly, a group of candidate genes with overexpression in gonidia is shown in Figure 2C.
From each of the two groups, 18 candidate genes were examined in more detail and compared with each other with respect to the following criteria: (i) overall expression level; (ii) extent of cell type-specific overexpression; (iii) quality of the gene models; (iv) matching of mapped RNA-seq reads with gene models; (v) predictability of the transcription start site; and (vi) availability of information on the possible function of the encoded protein. We obtained information on possible protein function by using the translated sequences of the V. carteri candidate genes to search with TBLASTN in the translated C. reinhardtii genome (v5.6) in Phytozome 13 [36] for the most similar protein sequence in C. reinhardtii. If there were hits with high sequence similarity (45 to 100%) and a function assignment in C. reinhardtii, we assumed an analogous function in V. carteri. The possible functions are given in Figure 2 and Supplementary Table S1, which also provides further details on the candidates. Based on the above criteria, we identified two genes/proteins as being most suitable: PCY1 (Vocar.0015s0197) and PFP (Vocar.0032s0153). Further suitable genes/proteins can certainly be selected from both groups for later applications.
PCY1 shows strong overexpression in gonidia and codes for plastocyanin, a small copper-containing protein that mediates electron transfer in photosynthesis. PFP shows strong overexpression in somatic cells and encodes a PLAC8 family protein, a small cysteine-rich plasma membrane protein that is putatively involved in cadmium resistance via heavy metal efflux. Both PCY1 and PFP are within the 0.01% genes with the highest expression in the respective cell type.

3.2. Construction of Chimeric Genes for Promoter Analysis and Application

The promoters of PCY1 and PFP were cloned from V. carteri genomic DNA and fused with a reporter gene, the G-Luc gene of the marine copepod Gaussia princeps coding for luciferase [73,85,86]. The version of the G-Luc gene used originates from the plasmid pPsaD-GLuc and was previously adapted to the nuclear codon usage of C. reinhardtii [73] but works just as well in V. carteri [53]. A major advantage of the G-Luc reporter gene is that a robust detection assay allows for the very sensitive detection of luciferase protein expression [53]. The artificial gene constructs also include a terminator region of the lhcbm1 gene of V. carteri (Vocar.0001s0479) [10], which encodes a chlorophyll a/b binding protein. To simplify cloning and allow for the flexible replacement of parts of the construct, PCR was used to add artificial restriction sites to all DNA fragments at their ends. For the promoters, these restriction sites were XhoI and ClaI; for the G-Luc reporter gene, they were ClaI and XbaI; and for the terminator sequence, they were XbaI and NotI. The ClaI site is located immediately upstream of the start ATG of G-Luc, and the NotI site is immediately downstream of the stop codon. The DNA fragments were combined in a pBluescript II SK (-) backbone to obtain the vectors pPCY1-Luc and pPFP-Luc for transformation of V. carteri (Figure 3A,B). The sequences of the chimeric genes are given in Supplementary Figures S1 and S2.

3.3. Generation of Stable Transgenic Volvox Strains with Chimeric Genes

The recipient V. carteri strain TNit-1013 [10], which carries a stable mutation of the nitrate reductase gene (nitA), was co-transformed with the chimeric genes on vectors pPCY1-Luc and pPFP-Luc (Figure 3A,B), separately, and with a selectable marker plasmid (pVcNR15) carrying the functional nitA gene for complementation of the nitA mutation of TNit-1013 [77]. After 6 to 10 days of selection in a medium containing nitrate as the sole nitrogen source, algae cultures were screened for viable and healthy (green) cells among many dead (white) or dying (yellowish) cells. The number of transformants obtained was different for the two vectors pPCY1-Luc and pPFP-Luc (see below).
The integration of the vector-based genes into the genome of V. carteri transformants was investigated by genomic PCR. For this purpose, transformants first had to be able to grow for four weeks under selective pressure, i.e., in medium with nitrate as the sole nitrogen source, before their genomic DNA was isolated. Using nitA-specific primers and the isolated genomic DNA as a template, genomically integrated nitA fragments from the original transformation vector, pVcNR15, were amplified by PCR. From all 29 pPCY1-Luc transformants and all 6 pPFP-Luc transformants, a fragment of the expected size of 278 bp could be obtained (Figure 4A). It should be noted that the nitA primers not only allow for the amplification of the intronless nitA fragment of 278 bp that we were looking for but also of a larger (459 bp) fragment of the endogenous nitA, which is defective in the recipient strain. However, the smaller 278 bp fragment prevailed over the larger 459 bp fragment during PCR amplification (Figure 4A).
All transformants were also checked for genomic integration of the G-Luc reporter gene, using G-Luc specific primers. In 28 of 29 pPCY1-Luc transformants and 5 of 6 pPFP-Luc transformants, a fragment with the expected size of 344 bp was obtained (Figure 4B). In the case of two transformants (pPCY1-8-1 and PFP-2-1), there is no band, i.e., no co-transformation occurred with pPCY1-Luc or pPFP-Luc, and only nitA from vector pVcNR15 integrated into their genomes. As expected, there is also no band in the recipient strain TNit-1013 because it does not contain the G-Luc gene.
All experiments investigating genomic integration were performed more than 15 generations after the transformation experiments. Thus, the introduced chimeric genes studied were repeatedly passed from parent algae to their offspring, and this is possible only in the case of stable integration into the genome. The microscopic examination of all transformants revealed no abnormalities with respect to the phenotype compared to the recipient and wild-type strain (Supplementary Figure S3). Thus, the expression of luciferase under control of the PFP and PCY1 promoters does not interfere with the normal development of the transgenic algae.
Based on all transformation experiments, we calculated a transformation efficiency of approximately 6 × 10−5 for pPCY1-Luc and 4 × 10−5 for pPFP-Luc. These values are similar to previously published transformation rates of approximately 2.5 × 10−5 [43], approximately 10−6 [46] and 0.6 to 1.2 × 10−5 [50].
The calculated co-transformation rate was 95% for pPCY1-Luc and 75% for pPFP-Luc. This is quite high compared to previous reports of 9 to 58% [50]; 40 to 80% [43]; 30% or 10 to 60% [46]; and 30 to 45 % [49]. Overall, the observed co-transformation rates appear to vary widely.

3.4. Fast Luciferase Screening Assay for General Detection of Transgene Expression

The demonstrated evidence of genomic integration of the transgenes does not guarantee their expression. Thus, the expression was also investigated using an enzyme assay: The G-Luc reporter gene utilized codes for a luciferase enzyme, which catalyzes the oxidation of coelenterazine while emitting light. For the enzyme assay, the enzyme only needs to be released by breaking the cells, but not purified. The cell lysates were generated by ultrasound sonication of complete spheroids of luciferase expressing Volvox transformants. Once the substrate is added to the cell lysates, a glow is visible even to the naked, dark-adapted eye in the darkroom if expression is strong enough. This method of detection is, of course, unsuitable as a measuring method. We therefore developed a semiquantitative assay for the fast screening of luciferase-expressing Volvox transformants. The number of processing steps, i.e., harvesting, cell lysis, incubation, and detection, was reduced to a minimum (see Section 2). In addition, the use of a chemiluminescence imager allows for the parallel measurement of many transformants, thus also enabling future large-scale applications. More than 15 generations after the transformation experiments, all transformants that had integrated both the nitA gene and the chimeric gene into their genomes were investigated for luciferase enzyme activity, using the fast luciferase screening assay (Figure 5).
As negative controls, a wild-type strain (Eve10), the recipient strain (TNit-1013), and two transformed strains without genomic integration of the co-transformed G-Luc vectors (PCY1-8-1 and PFP-2-1) were also tested. Considering the detected, albeit very low, light-emission in the tests with these four strains that do not have the G-Luc gene, we assume that a small fraction of the substrate is oxidized in this assay setup even in the absence of luciferase. Therefore, we defined a background level that is not attributable to luciferase activity. After subtracting this background, of the 28 pPCY1-Luc transformants with demonstrated genomic integration of the transgenes, 18 transformants showed clear luciferase activity due to PCY1-driven expression of G-Luc (Figure 5). Of the 5 pPFP-Luc transformants with proved genomic integration of the transgenes, all showed clear luciferase activity due to the PFP-driven expression of G-Luc (Figure 5). However, the measured luciferase activity varied greatly between the different transformants. This indicates that the G-Luc is expressed quite differently in different transformants, causing the enzyme amount to vary accordingly, a phenomenon generally observed in transgene expression. In the most highly expressing strain (PCY1-26 4), the light-emission, after subtraction of background, is more than 35-fold higher than in a strain with a clearly detectable but weak expression like that of PCY1-8-5. The wide range of expression strengths has the advantage here and in future applications that transformants with strong, medium, or weak expression can be selected depending on the objective. Transformants with medium–strong expression were selected for the following more detailed study.

3.5. Cell Type-Specific mRNA Expression of Transgenes Driven by PCY1 and PFP Promoters

By analyzing mRNA expression separately for each cell type, we investigated whether the G-Luc transgenes driven by PCY1 and PFP promoters show cell type-specific mRNA expression. For each of the two promoters used, a transformant with medium strong expression in the fast luciferase screening assay was selected as an example for this purpose, specifically PCY1-26-2 and PFP-1-5. In both strains, the two cell types were separated (Figure 6A,B) and total RNA was isolated from each of the two cell fractions. For measurement of cell type-specific mRNA expression of transgenes, quantitative real-time RT-PCR was performed using primers specifically for G-Luc, which is not present in the wild-type or recipient genome.
The endogenous reference gene used was tbpA, which has generally been established as a reference gene for quantitative gene expression studies [80] and, in particular, has proven to be especially useful as a reference gene for comparing the two cell types of V. carteri [81]. PCY1-driven expression in gonidia exceeds that of the reference gene by a factor of 98 (Figure 6C). Furthermore, PCY1-driven expression is 57 times higher in gonidia than in somatic cells (Figure 6C). For PFP-driven expression, the cell-type specificity and expression level are almost exactly the opposite of that for PCY1-driven expression. PFP-driven expression in somatic exceeds that of the reference gene by a factor of 57 (Figure 6D). Moreover, PFP-driven expression is 69 times higher in somatic cells than in gonidia (Figure 6D).
The expression of the PCY1- and PFP-driven transgenes in the transformants basically corresponds to the expression of the unmodified PCY1 and PFP genes in the wild-type algae. For the transgenes in transformants, however, the differences in expression between the cell types are actually more pronounced than for the unmodified genes in the wild type. In the wild type, only a 23-fold-higher expression of PCY1 was measured in gonidia compared to somatic cells, and only an 18.6-fold-higher expression of PFP in somatic cells compared to gonidia [4]. However, this may also be due to the different methods used, because expression of the transgenes in the transformants was performed here by quantitative real time RT-PCR, whereas expression of the unmodified PCY1 and PFP genes in wild-type algae was performed by RNA-sequencing. It was observed earlier that RNA-sequencing-based transcriptome analysis tends to underestimate the cell-type specificity compared to real-time PCR-based single-gene expression measurements [4].

3.6. Quantification of PCY1- or PFP-Regulated Luciferase Activity Separately for Each Cell Type

Finally, after the investigation of transformants for cell type-specific mRNA expression of the G-Luc transgenes driven by PCY1 and PFP promoters, cell-type specificity should be investigated at the protein expression level by measuring the luciferase enzyme activity. While the fast luciferase screening assay that was first used focused on the semi-quantitative rapid screening of a large number of transformants without cell-type separation, a more elaborate sensitive and quantitative measurement should now be performed on the separated cell types of selected transformants. Specifically, for each of the two promoters, three transformants with medium–strong expression in the rapid luciferase screening assay were chosen, namely for PCY1-transformants PCY1-23-2, PCY1-26-2, and PCY1-28-2 and for PFP-transformants PFP-1-5, PFP-4-4, and PFP-9-1.
Transformants were grown under standard conditions, their cell types were separated, the cells were then lysed, and then the luciferase activity was quantitated in the supernatants after the addition of the coelenterazine substrate, using a Sirius-L tube luminometer (Berthold, Bad Wildbad, Germany). To allow for a quantitative comparison of luciferase enzyme activity, all measured luciferase activity values were normalized with the respective chlorophyll content of the samples, which is proportional to the original cell density. In contrast to the rapid luciferase screening assay above, this measurement yields a much better signal-to-background ratio. Therefore, the values of the negative controls defining the background level of substrate turnover that could not be attributed to luciferase activity appear to be particularly low in Figure 7.
The quantification of the luciferase expression driven by the PCY1 promoter showed that the enzyme activity in the gonidia of transformants was 33-to-39-fold (average 35.8-fold) higher than in their somatic cells (Figure 7A). With the PFP promoter, it was the other way around: the quantification of the luciferase expression driven by the PFP promoter showed that activity in the somatic cells of transformants was 30-to-55-fold (average 35.5-fold) higher than in their gonidia (Figure 7B). Both PCY1-driven expression in somatic cells and PFP-driven expression in gonidia are extremely low, or in other words, each of the two promoters is almost completely off in one of the two cell types. Thus, the PCY1 promoter allows for cell type-specific expression in gonidia, and the PFP promoter allows for cell type-specific expression in somatic cells.
The observed marked differences in the expression strengths between transformants that are produced in the same way are a known phenomenon that can also be exploited in expression experiments (see Discussion).

4. Discussion

In the course of this work, transcriptome data of V. carteri were screened for potential strong and cell type-specific promoters for V. carteri. Two of them were selected for experimental testing: one with potential strong gonidia-specific expression, the PCY1 promoter, and one with potential strong soma-specific expression, the PFP promoter. These promoters were cloned, placed in front of a reporter gene, and integrated into the genome of V. carteri, using particle bombardment. Analyses of the transformants confirmed cell type-specific expression, with varying strengths among transformants. Experiments on the presence of the chimeric genes in the V. carteri genome took place more than 15 generations after the transformation experiments. Thus, the genomic integrations of the chimeric genes can be described as stable. In relation to the cell type-specific distribution of the PCY1 and PFP mRNAs in wild-type, as identified through RNA-Seq analyses, both cloned promoters exhibit comparable cell type-specific expression of reporter genes in the transformants. Therefore, the cloned promoters function in the same way in front of the reporter genes as they do at their natural loci in front of their original genes. With these two promoters, the molecular toolbox of Volvox can now be expanded by two cell type-specific promoters, which are now available for further experiments.
Since the transfer of the promoter regions from the genome to the vectors did not change the properties of the promoters, it can be concluded that both the 617 bp promoter region of the V. carteri PCY1 gene and the 1183 bp promoter region of the V. carteri PFP gene contain not only the core promoter but also all cis-acting regulatory elements required for cell-type specificity. In future studies, the transformation vectors pPCY1-Luc and pPFP-Luc will therefore allow us to shorten and mutate the promoter regions and then use the maintenance or disappearance of cell-type specificity in generated transformants to find out which DNA elements and motifs are actually required for cell type-specific expression. In addition to the identification of these DNA elements, the binding transcription factors could also be identified, e.g., with electrophoretic mobility shift assays.
We constructed the vectors pPCY1-Luc and pPFP-Luc in such a way that the reporter gene is flanked by two unique restriction sites (ClaI and XbaI). Therefore, the reporter gene can easily be exchanged against any other gene of interest.
In vectors pPCY1-Luc and pPFP-Luc, the promoter regions are also flanked by unique restriction sites (XhoI and ClaI). This design allows for the convenient substitution of these promoter regions with alternative cell type-specific or other promoter regions, enabling them to be tested in the same way.
The fast luciferase screening assay established in this work allows for the parallel measurement of a large number of transformants in future large-scale applications, using a chemiluminescence imager. For this rapid test, the cells of the transformants only need to be lysed; no further steps are necessary. However, this fast assay therefore only allows for a semi-quantitative evaluation of luciferase activity. For more accurate, sensitive individual measurements, a luciferase assay with a low signal-to-background ratio is also available. In this assay, the measured values are also normalized with the respective chlorophyll content of the samples, as this is proportional to the cell density.
As mentioned above, the expression strengths of the transgenes differed markedly between different transformants produced in the same way and with the same DNA constructs. This phenomenon is already known from previous expression studies in other Volvox transformants [53] or transformants of related green algae [75,76,79,87,88], or of higher plants [89] or animals [90]. The reasons for this can be different frequencies of insertion of the DNA constructs into the genomes of transformants [89], different position effects at the integration sites of the DNA constructs [91,92] since the integration happens randomly, and epigenetic gene silencing of transgenes [87,88,93]. However, the different expression strength of the transformants is not a disadvantage at all. Depending on the application, not only a particularly strong expression is desired but sometimes also a medium or weak expression. Due to the spectrum of transformants with different expression strengths, it becomes possible to select the transformant that possesses the most suitable expression strength. When opting for new promoters, however, care should be taken to ensure that the promoters express themselves as strongly as possible. It appears to be considerably easier to discover transformants with diminished expression compared to the wild-type gene, rather than those demonstrating enhanced expression.
The two cell type-specific promoters of PCY1 and PFP that are now harnessed offer various capabilities. First, these promoters can be used to label different cell types with fluorescent proteins in different colors. This could help us study mutants more easily in germ–soma differentiations, such as regA mutants [55]. Furthermore, these promoters can be used to specifically manipulate individual cell types. This is achievable by cell type-specific RNAi knockdown or cell type-specific overexpression of a gene of interest exclusively in the desired cell type. It is also feasible to express cell type-specific key proteins, such as transcription factors in the wrong cell type to learn from the perturbations caused. With cell type-specific promoters, a rescuing transgene can also be expressed in only one cell type in an otherwise mutant background.
Profound genetic engineering of critical components usually turned out to be lethal [54,94] because components are frequently also involved in reproduction. Since in Volvox only gonidia are responsible for reproduction, it should be possible to specifically use the soma-specific promoter PFP to perform even severe manipulations of soma cells or their components that could even limit the viability of somatic cells. Especially soma-specific cell components such as flagella, eyespot apparatus, or the extracellular matrix could be studied with genetic-engineering experiments in this way. Even if the genes of interest are essential in both wild-type cell types, the manipulation in transformants can be restricted to the somatic cells only. As long as the gonidia remain capable of dividing and new reproductive cells are generated again, the organism should be able to be propagated under laboratory conditions. This could also allow overexpression or knockdown experiments, which cannot be performed in the closely related Chlamydomonas algae due to the lethality there, to be performed analogously in somatic cells of Volvox.
It can be assumed that there is even more potential for these cell type-specific promoters that is yet to be discovered.

5. Conclusions

Our aim was to harness cell type-specific promoters in V. carteri. Through screening and analyzing transcriptome data from RNA sequencing, we were able to make an initial selection. Eventually, we identified two promising and cell type-specific promoters—one for gonidia-specific expression, the PCY1 promoter, and one for specific expression in somatic cells, the PFP promoter. By employing the G-Luc reporter gene, we constructed chimeric genes and conducted tests on both promoters. The results conclusively demonstrated that both promoters effectively mediate cell type-specific expression in the respective target cell types. The investigated PCY1 and PFP promoters were proved to be potent molecular tools for genetic engineering in V. carteri.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14071389/s1: Supplementary Figure S1: Insert sequence of the vector pPCY1-Luc; Supplementary Figure S2: Insert sequence of the vector pPFP-Luc; Supplementary Figure S3: Phenotypes of wild-type, recipient, and transformant V. carteri strains; Supplementary Table S1: Genes and encoded proteins with both very strong and cell type-specific overexpression in somatic cells and gonidia, respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.v.d.H., E.L.v.d.H., and A.H.; methodology, B.v.d.H. and E.L.v.d.H.; validation, B.v.d.H., E.L.v.d.H., and A.H.; writing original draft preparation, B.v.d.H., E.L.v.d.H., and A.H.; writing—review and editing, B.v.d.H., E.L.v.d.H., and A.H.; supervision, A.H.; funding acquisition, A.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Bielefeld University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and its supplementary information files. Plasmids are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Nicole Graumann, Tinja Strothans, Nils Schneekloth, and Nele Winker for help with cloning and performing preliminary experiments and Kordula Puls for technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Kirk, D.L. Volvox: Molecular-Genetic Origins of Multicellularity and Cellular Differentiation, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hallmann, A. Evolution of reproductive development in the volvocine algae. Sex. Plant Reprod. 2011, 24, 97–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Nematollahi, G.; Kianianmomeni, A.; Hallmann, A. Quantitative analysis of cell-type specific gene expression in the green alga Volvox carteri. BMC Genom. 2006, 7, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Klein, B.; Wibberg, D.; Hallmann, A. Whole transcriptome RNA-Seq analysis reveals extensive cell type-specific compartmentalization in Volvox carteri. BMC Biol. 2017, 15, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Matt, G.Y.; Umen, J.G. Cell-type transcriptomes of the multicellular green alga Volvox carteri yield insights into the evolutionary origins of germ and somatic differentiation programs. G3 2018, 8, 531–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Day, T.C.; Höhn, S.S.; Zamani-Dahaj, S.A.; Yanni, D.; Burnetti, A.; Pentz, J.; Honerkamp-Smith, A.R.; Wioland, H.; Sleath, H.R.; Ratcliff, W.C.; et al. Cellular organization in lab-evolved and extant multicellular species obeys a maximum entropy law. eLife 2022, 11, e72707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Matt, G.; Umen, J. Volvox: A simple algal model for embryogenesis, morphogenesis and cellular differentiation. Dev. Biol. 2016, 419, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lindsey, C.R.; Rosenzweig, F.; Herron, M.D. Phylotranscriptomics points to multiple independent origins of multicellularity and cellular differentiation in the volvocine algae. BMC Biol. 2021, 19, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kirk, D.L. A twelve-step program for evolving multicellularity and a division of labor. BioEssays 2005, 27, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tian, Y.; Gao, S.; von der Heyde, E.L.; Hallmann, A.; Nagel, G. Two-component cyclase opsins of green algae are ATP-dependent and light-inhibited guanylyl cyclases. BMC Biol. 2018, 16, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kianianmomeni, A.; Hallmann, A. Transcriptional analysis of Volvox photoreceptors suggests the existence of different cell-type specific light-signaling pathways. Curr. Genet. 2015, 61, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kianianmomeni, A.; Stehfest, K.; Nematollahi, G.; Hegemann, P.; Hallmann, A. Channelrhodopsins of Volvox carteri are photochromic proteins that are specifically expressed in somatic cells under control of light, temperature, and the sex inducer. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 347–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ueki, N.; Matsunaga, S.; Inouye, I.; Hallmann, A. How 5000 independent rowers coordinate their strokes in order to row into the sunlight: Phototaxis in the multicellular green alga Volvox. BMC Biol. 2010, 8, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Drescher, K.; Goldstein, R.E.; Tuval, I. Fidelity of adaptive phototaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 11171–11176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. von der Heyde, E.L.; Hallmann, A. Molecular and cellular dynamics of early embryonic cell divisions in Volvox carteri. Plant Cell 2022, 34, 1326–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cheng, Q.; Pappas, V.; Hallmann, A.; Miller, S.M. Hsp70A and GlsA interact as partner chaperones to regulate asymmetric division in Volvox. Dev. Biol. 2005, 286, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Sumper, M.; Hallmann, A. Biochemistry of the extracellular matrix of Volvox. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1998, 180, 51–85. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hallmann, A. The pherophorins: Common, versatile building blocks in the evolution of extracellular matrix architecture in Volvocales. Plant J. 2006, 45, 292–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nishimura, M.; Nagashio, R.; Sato, Y.; Hasegawa, T. Late Somatic Gene 2 disrupts parental spheroids cooperatively with Volvox hatching enzyme A in Volvox. Planta 2017, 245, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. von der Heyde, B.; Hallmann, A. Targeted migration of pherophorin-S indicates extensive extracellular matrix dynamics in Volvox carteri. Plant J. 2020, 103, 2301–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. von der Heyde, B.; Hallmann, A. Cell type-specific pherophorins of Volvox carteri reveal interplay of both cell types in ECM biosynthesis. Cells 2023, 12, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Viamontes, G.I.; Kirk, D.L. Cell shape changes and the mechanism of inversion in Volvox. J. Cell Biol. 1977, 75, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kirk, D.L.; Viamontes, G.I.; Green, K.J.; Bryant, J.L., Jr. Integrated morphogenetic behavior of cell sheets: Volvox as a model. In Developmental Order: Its Origin and Regulation; Subtelny, S., Green, P.B., Eds.; Alan R. Liss: New York, NY, USA, 1982; pp. 247–274. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kirk, D.L.; Nishii, I. Volvox carteri as a model for studying the genetic and cytological control of morphogenesis. Dev. Growth Differ. 2001, 43, 621–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nishii, I.; Ogihara, S.; Kirk, D.L. A kinesin, invA, plays an essential role in Volvox morphogenesis. Cell 2003, 113, 743–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Hallmann, A. Morphogenesis in the family Volvocaceae: Different tactics for turning an embryo right-side out. Protist 2006, 157, 445–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Haas, P.A.; Goldstein, R.E. Embryonic inversion in Volvox carteri: The flipping and peeling of elastic lips. Phys. Rev. E 2018, 98, 052415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Prochnik, S.E.; Umen, J.; Nedelcu, A.M.; Hallmann, A.; Miller, S.M.; Nishii, I.; Ferris, P.; Kuo, A.; Mitros, T.; Fritz-Laylin, L.K.; et al. Genomic analysis of organismal complexity in the multicellular green alga Volvox carteri. Science 2010, 329, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Merchant, S.S.; Prochnik, S.E.; Vallon, O.; Harris, E.H.; Karpowicz, S.J.; Witman, G.B.; Terry, A.; Salamov, A.; Fritz-Laylin, L.K.; Marechal-Drouard, L.; et al. The Chlamydomonas genome reveals the evolution of key animal and plant functions. Science 2007, 318, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Craig, R.J.; Gallaher, S.D.; Shu, S.; Salome, P.; Jenkins, J.W.; Blaby-Haas, C.E.; Purvine, S.O.; O’Donnell, S.; Barry, K.; Grimwood, J.; et al. The Chlamydomonas Genome Project, version 6: Reference assemblies for mating type plus and minus strains reveal extensive structural mutation in the laboratory. Plant Cell 2023, 35, 644–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Blaby, I.K.; Blaby-Haas, C.E.; Tourasse, N.; Hom, E.F.; Lopez, D.; Aksoy, M.; Grossman, A.; Umen, J.; Dutcher, S.; Porter, M.; et al. The Chlamydomonas genome project: A decade on. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 672–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Featherston, J.; Arakaki, Y.; Hanschen, E.R.; Ferris, P.J.; Michod, R.E.; Olson, B.; Nozaki, H.; Durand, P.M. The 4-celled Tetrabaena socialis nuclear genome reveals the essential components for genetic control of cell number at the origin of multicellularity in the volvocine lineage. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 855–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hanschen, E.R.; Marriage, T.N.; Ferris, P.J.; Hamaji, T.; Toyoda, A.; Fujiyama, A.; Neme, R.; Noguchi, H.; Minakuchi, Y.; Suzuki, M.; et al. The Gonium pectorale genome demonstrates co-option of cell cycle regulation during the evolution of multicellularity. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Yamashita, S.; Yamamoto, K.; Matsuzaki, R.; Suzuki, S.; Yamaguchi, H.; Hirooka, S.; Minakuchi, Y.; Miyagishima, S.Y.; Kawachi, M.; Toyoda, A.; et al. Genome sequencing of the multicellular alga Astrephomene provides insights into convergent evolution of germ-soma differentiation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jimenez-Marin, B.; Rakijas, J.B.; Tyagi, A.; Pandey, A.; Hanschen, E.R.; Anderson, J.; Heffel, M.G.; Platt, T.G.; Olson, B. Gene loss during a transition to multicellularity. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 5268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Goodstein, D.M.; Shu, S.; Howson, R.; Neupane, R.; Hayes, R.D.; Fazo, J.; Mitros, T.; Dirks, W.; Hellsten, U.; Putnam, N.; et al. Phytozome: A comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D1178–D1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Clark, K.; Karsch-Mizrachi, I.; Lipman, D.J.; Ostell, J.; Sayers, E.W. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D67–D72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Benson, D.A.; Cavanaugh, M.; Clark, K.; Karsch-Mizrachi, I.; Ostell, J.; Pruitt, K.D.; Sayers, E.W. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D41–D47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Sayers, E.W.; Cavanaugh, M.; Clark, K.; Ostell, J.; Pruitt, K.D.; Karsch-Mizrachi, I. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D84–D86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Dueck, A.; Evers, M.; Henz, S.R.; Unger, K.; Eichner, N.; Merkl, R.; Berezikov, E.; Engelmann, J.C.; Weigel, D.; Wenzl, S.; et al. Gene silencing pathways found in the green alga Volvox carteri reveal insights into evolution and origins of small RNA systems in plants. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kianianmomeni, A.; Ong, C.S.; Rätsch, G.; Hallmann, A. Genome-wide analysis of alternative splicing in Volvox carteri. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Balasubramanian, R.N.; Umen, J. Identification of cell-type specific alternative transcripts in the multicellular alga Volvox carteri. bioRxiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Schiedlmeier, B.; Schmitt, R.; Müller, W.; Kirk, M.M.; Gruber, H.; Mages, W.; Kirk, D.L. Nuclear transformation of Volvox carteri. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 5080–5084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hallmann, A.; Rappel, A.; Sumper, M. Gene replacement by homologous recombination in the multicellular green alga Volvox carteri. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 7469–7474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gruber, H.; Goetinck, S.D.; Kirk, D.L.; Schmitt, R. The nitrate reductase-encoding gene of Volvox carteri: Map location, sequence and induction kinetics. Gene 1992, 120, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hallmann, A.; Rappel, A. Genetic engineering of the multicellular green alga Volvox: A modified and multiplied bacterial antibiotic resistance gene as a dominant selectable marker. Plant J. 1999, 17, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hallmann, A.; Sumper, M. Reporter genes and highly regulated promoters as tools for transformation experiments in Volvox carteri. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 11562–11566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hallmann, A.; Sumper, M. The Chlorella hexose/H+ symporter is a useful selectable marker and biochemical reagent when expressed in Volvox. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 669–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jakobiak, T.; Mages, W.; Scharf, B.; Babinger, P.; Stark, K.; Schmitt, R. The bacterial paromomycin resistance gene, aphH, as a dominant selectable marker in Volvox carteri. Protist 2004, 155, 381–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ortega-Escalante, J.A.; Kwok, O.; Miller, S.M. New selectable markers for Volvox carteri transformation. Protist 2019, 170, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pappas, V.; Miller, S.M. Functional analysis of the Volvox carteri asymmetric division protein GlsA. Mech. Dev. 2009, 126, 842–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ender, F.; Godl, K.; Wenzl, S.; Sumper, M. Evidence for autocatalytic cross-linking of hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins during extracellular matrix assembly in Volvox. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 1147–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. von der Heyde, E.L.; Klein, B.; Abram, L.; Hallmann, A. The inducible nitA promoter provides a powerful molecular switch for transgene expression in Volvox carteri. BMC Biotechnol. 2015, 15, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. von der Heyde, E.L.; Hallmann, A. Babo1, formerly Vop1 and Cop1/2, is no eyespot photoreceptor but a basal body protein illuminating cell division in Volvox carteri. Plant J. 2020, 102, 276–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Kirk, M.M.; Stark, K.; Miller, S.M.; Müller, W.; Taillon, B.E.; Gruber, H.; Schmitt, R.; Kirk, D.L. regA, a Volvox gene that plays a central role in germ-soma differentiation, encodes a novel regulatory protein. Development 1999, 126, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Miller, S.M.; Kirk, D.L. glsA, a Volvox gene required for asymmetric division and germ cell specification, encodes a chaperone-like protein. Development 1999, 126, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ueki, N.; Nishii, I. Idaten is a new cold-inducible transposon of Volvox carteri that can be used for tagging developmentally important genes. Genetics 2008, 180, 1343–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Geng, S.; De Hoff, P.; Umen, J.G. Evolution of sexes from an ancestral mating-type specification pathway. PLoS Biol. 2014, 12, e1001904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ortega-Escalante, J.A.; Jasper, R.; Miller, S.M. CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis in Volvox carteri. Plant J. 2019, 97, 661–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Godl, K.; Hallmann, A.; Wenzl, S.; Sumper, M. Differential targeting of closely related ECM glycoproteins: The pherophorin family from Volvox. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hallmann, A.; Sumper, M. An inducible arylsulfatase of Volvox carteri with properties suitable for a reporter-gene system. Purification, characterization and molecular cloning. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994, 221, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Hilker, R.; Stadermann, K.B.; Doppmeier, D.; Kalinowski, J.; Stoye, J.; Straube, J.; Winnebald, J.; Goesmann, A. ReadXplorer—Visualization and analysis of mapped sequences. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2247–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Anders, S.; Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010, 11, R106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Anders, S.; McCarthy, D.J.; Chen, Y.; Okoniewski, M.; Smyth, G.K.; Huber, W.; Robinson, M.D. Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8, 1765–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2016; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 15 May 2023).
  66. Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Society. Ser. B (Methodol.) 1995, 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Starr, R.C. Structure, reproduction and differentiation in Volvox carteri f. nagariensis Iyengar, strains HK 9 & 10. Arch. Protistenkd. 1969, 111, 204–222. [Google Scholar]
  68. Starr, R.C. Control of differentiation in Volvox. Dev. Biol. Suppl. 1970, 4, 59–100. [Google Scholar]
  69. Kianianmomeni, A.; Nematollahi, G.; Hallmann, A. A gender-specific retinoblastoma-related protein in Volvox carteri implies a role for the retinoblastoma protein family in sexual development. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 2399–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Provasoli, L.; Pintner, I.J. Artificial media for fresh-water algae: Problems and suggestions. In The Ecology of Algae, a Symposium Held at the Pymatuning Laboratory of Field Biology on 18–19 June 1959, 1st ed.; Tryon, C.A., Hartman, R.T., Eds.; The Pymatuning Symposia in Ecology, Special Publication No. 2; University of Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1959; pp. 84–96. [Google Scholar]
  71. Starr, R.C.; Jaenicke, L. Purification and characterization of the hormone initiating sexual morphogenesis in Volvox carteri f. nagariensis Iyengar. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1974, 71, 1050–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Edwards, K.; Johnstone, C.; Thompson, C. A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19, 1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shao, N.; Bock, R. A codon-optimized luciferase from Gaussia princeps facilitates the in vivo monitoring of gene expression in the model alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Curr. Genet. 2008, 53, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Hallmann, A.; Wodniok, S. Swapped green algal promoters: aphVIII-based gene constructs with Chlamydomonas flanking sequences work as dominant selectable markers in Volvox and vice versa. Plant Cell Rep. 2006, 25, 582–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lerche, K.; Hallmann, A. Stable nuclear transformation of Eudorina elegans. BMC Biotechnol. 2013, 13, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Lerche, K.; Hallmann, A. Stable nuclear transformation of Gonium pectorale. BMC Biotechnol. 2009, 9, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Gruber, H.; Kirzinger, S.H.; Schmitt, R. Expression of the Volvox gene encoding nitrate reductase: Mutation-dependent activation of cryptic splice sites and intron-enhanced gene expression from a cDNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 1996, 31, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Lerche, K.; Hallmann, A. Stable nuclear transformation of Pandorina morum. BMC Biotechnol. 2014, 14, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Siaut, M.; Heijde, M.; Mangogna, M.; Montsant, A.; Coesel, S.; Allen, A.; Manfredonia, A.; Falciatore, A.; Bowler, C. Molecular toolbox for studying diatom biology in Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Gene 2007, 406, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Kianianmomeni, A.; Hallmann, A. Validation of reference genes for quantitative gene expression studies in Volvox carteri using real-time RT-PCR. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 40, 6691–6699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Bustin, S.A. Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2000, 25, 169–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Pfaffl, M.W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, e45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jeffrey, S.W.; Humphrey, G.F. New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophyll a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton. Biochem. Physiol. Pflanz. 1975, 167, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Barnes, A.T.; Case, J.F. Bioluminescence in the mesopelagic copepod, Gaussia princeps (T. Scott). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1972, 8, 53–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Szent-Gyorgyi, C.; Ballou, B.T.; Dagmal, E.; Bryan, B. Cloning and characterization of new bioluminescent proteins. Proc. SPIE 1999, 3600, 4–11. [Google Scholar]
  87. Neupert, J.; Gallaher, S.D.; Lu, Y.; Strenkert, D.; Segal, N.; Barahimipour, R.; Fitz-Gibbon, S.T.; Schroda, M.; Merchant, S.S.; Bock, R. An epigenetic gene silencing pathway selectively acting on transgenic DNA in the green alga Chlamydomonas. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Cerutti, H.; Johnson, A.M.; Gillham, N.W.; Boynton, J.E. Epigenetic silencing of a foreign gene in nuclear transformants of Chlamydomonas. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 925–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Hobbs, S.L.; Warkentin, T.D.; DeLong, C.M. Transgene copy number can be positively or negatively associated with transgene expression. Plant Mol. Biol. 1993, 21, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cabrera, A.; Edelstein, H.I.; Glykofrydis, F.; Love, K.S.; Palacios, S.; Tycko, J.; Zhang, M.; Lensch, S.; Shields, C.E.; Livingston, M.; et al. The sound of silence: Transgene silencing in mammalian cell engineering. Cell Syst. 2022, 13, 950–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Jones, J.D.; Dunsmuir, P.; Bedbrook, J. High level expression of introduced chimaeric genes in regenerated transformed plants. EMBO J. 1985, 4, 2411–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Peach, C.; Velten, J. Transgene expression variability (position effect) of CAT and GUS reporter genes driven by linked divergent T-DNA promoters. Plant Mol. Biol. 1991, 17, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Yamasaki, T.; Ohama, T. Involvement of Elongin C in the spread of repressive histone modifications. Plant J. 2011, 65, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Schoppmeier, J.; Mages, W.; Lechtreck, K.F. GFP as a tool for the analysis of proteins in the flagellar basal apparatus of Chlamydomonas. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 2005, 61, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 14 01389 g001 550
Figure 1. Phenotype and schematic cross-section of a V. carteri spheroid. (A) Wild-type phenotype of V. carteri, exemplified by an asexually grown female adult of strain Eve10. The alga consists of approximately 2000 small somatic cells and approximately 16 considerably larger gonidia, which are just before the beginning of embryogenesis. All cells are embedded in a transparent glycoprotein-rich extracellular matrix. The anterior pole of the spheroid is at the top of the image. (B) Close-up of the somatic cells. Top view from outside of the spheroid onto the flagellated pole of the somatic cells. All somatic cells are oriented so that their orange eyespots point to the posterior pole of the spheroid. (C) Close-up of a gonidium, with the focal plane bisecting the cell. (D) Schematic cross-section of a part of the V. carteri spheroid illustrating the arrangement of the cells and relevant subcellular structures. The small somatic cells, in contrast to the gonidia, have two flagella and an eyespot. To enable locomotion, they are localized at the surface of the spheroid. The large gonidia, which are located further inside the spheroid, are characterized by a large chloroplast and several large vacuoles arranged radially around the central nucleus.
Figure 1. Phenotype and schematic cross-section of a V. carteri spheroid. (A) Wild-type phenotype of V. carteri, exemplified by an asexually grown female adult of strain Eve10. The alga consists of approximately 2000 small somatic cells and approximately 16 considerably larger gonidia, which are just before the beginning of embryogenesis. All cells are embedded in a transparent glycoprotein-rich extracellular matrix. The anterior pole of the spheroid is at the top of the image. (B) Close-up of the somatic cells. Top view from outside of the spheroid onto the flagellated pole of the somatic cells. All somatic cells are oriented so that their orange eyespots point to the posterior pole of the spheroid. (C) Close-up of a gonidium, with the focal plane bisecting the cell. (D) Schematic cross-section of a part of the V. carteri spheroid illustrating the arrangement of the cells and relevant subcellular structures. The small somatic cells, in contrast to the gonidia, have two flagella and an eyespot. To enable locomotion, they are localized at the surface of the spheroid. The large gonidia, which are located further inside the spheroid, are characterized by a large chloroplast and several large vacuoles arranged radially around the central nucleus.
Genes 14 01389 g001
Genes 14 01389 g002 550
Figure 2. MA-plot of genome-wide gene expression data of both cell types. Each dot in this two-dimensional MA-plot represents both the absolute expression intensity of a given gene and the differences in expression of this gene between somatic cells and gonidia. More specifically, A-values (X-axis) represent the averages of absolute intensity of expression (mean of normalized counts) of a given gene in logarithmic scale, and M-values (Y-axis) represent the log2 fold difference in expression intensity of the same gene between the two cell types (somatic cells versus gonidia). Genes are classified as being expressed in a cell type-specific manner if the difference in expression between the two cell types is ≥2 and the significance value is ≤0.05, and they are shown with brilliant blue dots. Genes that do not meet these criteria are shown with light blue dots. The underlying RNA-Seq data originate from a previous whole transcriptome analysis [4]. (A) Full MA-plot (Bland–Altman plot) of the expression dataset. At total of 7691 genes (54%) show cell type-specific expression (brilliant blue dots). About half of them, more precisely 3728 genes (26%), show overexpression in somatic cells, and about half, more precisely 3963 genes (28%), show overexpression in gonidia. A total of 6556 genes (46%) do not show cell type-specific expression (light blue dots). Adapted from [4], with permission from BMC Biology, 2017. (B,C) Magnification of image sections highlighted in (A) showing genes with both very strong and cell type-specific overexpression in somatic cells and gonidia, respectively. Promoter regions of genes meeting these two criteria were considered candidates for cell type-specific overexpression of genes of interest in V. carteri. The names of the proteins encoded by the candidate genes are listed and further details are given in Supplementary Table S1. The two genes finally selected for expression analyses are circled in red in (B,C), respectively.
Figure 2. MA-plot of genome-wide gene expression data of both cell types. Each dot in this two-dimensional MA-plot represents both the absolute expression intensity of a given gene and the differences in expression of this gene between somatic cells and gonidia. More specifically, A-values (X-axis) represent the averages of absolute intensity of expression (mean of normalized counts) of a given gene in logarithmic scale, and M-values (Y-axis) represent the log2 fold difference in expression intensity of the same gene between the two cell types (somatic cells versus gonidia). Genes are classified as being expressed in a cell type-specific manner if the difference in expression between the two cell types is ≥2 and the significance value is ≤0.05, and they are shown with brilliant blue dots. Genes that do not meet these criteria are shown with light blue dots. The underlying RNA-Seq data originate from a previous whole transcriptome analysis [4]. (A) Full MA-plot (Bland–Altman plot) of the expression dataset. At total of 7691 genes (54%) show cell type-specific expression (brilliant blue dots). About half of them, more precisely 3728 genes (26%), show overexpression in somatic cells, and about half, more precisely 3963 genes (28%), show overexpression in gonidia. A total of 6556 genes (46%) do not show cell type-specific expression (light blue dots). Adapted from [4], with permission from BMC Biology, 2017. (B,C) Magnification of image sections highlighted in (A) showing genes with both very strong and cell type-specific overexpression in somatic cells and gonidia, respectively. Promoter regions of genes meeting these two criteria were considered candidates for cell type-specific overexpression of genes of interest in V. carteri. The names of the proteins encoded by the candidate genes are listed and further details are given in Supplementary Table S1. The two genes finally selected for expression analyses are circled in red in (B,C), respectively.
Genes 14 01389 g002
Genes 14 01389 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the transformation vectors pPCY1-Luc and pPFP-Luc. Both transformation vectors carry the coding sequence of the reporter gene G-Luc (570 bp), which is under the control of a gonidia- or soma-specific promoter, respectively. G-Luc encodes the luciferase of G. princeps. Both vectors also contain 292 bp of the terminator region of the V. carteri Lhcbm1 gene. For propagation in Escherichia coli, the vectors have the backbone of pBluescript II SK (-), including an origin of replication of E. coli and an ampicillin-resistance cassette. The vector backbones are shown shortened (dashed lines). (A) In the transformation vector pPCY1-Luc, the reporter gene G-Luc is controlled by a 617 bp promoter region of the V. carteri PCY1 gene (Vocar.0015s0197), which exhibits gonidia-specific expression. (B) In the transformation vector pPFP-Luc, the reporter gene G-Luc is controlled by a 1183 bp promoter region of the V. carteri PFP gene (Vocar.0032s0153), which exhibits soma-specific expression.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the transformation vectors pPCY1-Luc and pPFP-Luc. Both transformation vectors carry the coding sequence of the reporter gene G-Luc (570 bp), which is under the control of a gonidia- or soma-specific promoter, respectively. G-Luc encodes the luciferase of G. princeps. Both vectors also contain 292 bp of the terminator region of the V. carteri Lhcbm1 gene. For propagation in Escherichia coli, the vectors have the backbone of pBluescript II SK (-), including an origin of replication of E. coli and an ampicillin-resistance cassette. The vector backbones are shown shortened (dashed lines). (A) In the transformation vector pPCY1-Luc, the reporter gene G-Luc is controlled by a 617 bp promoter region of the V. carteri PCY1 gene (Vocar.0015s0197), which exhibits gonidia-specific expression. (B) In the transformation vector pPFP-Luc, the reporter gene G-Luc is controlled by a 1183 bp promoter region of the V. carteri PFP gene (Vocar.0032s0153), which exhibits soma-specific expression.
Genes 14 01389 g003
Genes 14 01389 g004 550
Figure 4. Proof of genomic integration of both nitA and G-Luc genes in transformants. Transformants capable of growing with nitrate as the sole source of nitrogen were analyzed for the presence of the nitA gene (A) and the G-Luc gene (B) in their genome by genomic PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis. Upon transformation, the nitA gene was located on the selectable marker vector, whereas the G-Luc was located on the second, co-transformed vector. The recipient strain TNit-1013 was used as a negative control. This PCR assay was performed more than 15 generations after the transformation of the strains to also test genetic stability. (A) The nitA-specific primers can bind to both the endogenous defective nitA gene and the functional nitA inserted during transformation, but different fragment sizes result. The defective nitA yields a 459 bp fragment, and the inserted nitA yields a 278 bp fragment. The reason for the size difference is that the fragment from the endogenous defective nitA contains the tenth nitA intron (181 bp), which is not present in the inserted functional version of nitA. If the inserted nitA is present in a transformant, the smaller 278 bp fragment prevails over the larger 459 bp fragment during PCR amplification. Since the recipient strain TNit-1013 has only the defective endogenous nitA gene, the larger, intron-containing 459 bp fragment is expected in this strain. (B) The G-Luc-specific primers can only bind to the reporter gene inserted during co-transformation. PCR amplification is expected to result in a 344 bp fragment if G-Luc is present. M-lanes refer to the molecular-weight marker, and the sizes of the marker bands are indicated on the left.
Figure 4. Proof of genomic integration of both nitA and G-Luc genes in transformants. Transformants capable of growing with nitrate as the sole source of nitrogen were analyzed for the presence of the nitA gene (A) and the G-Luc gene (B) in their genome by genomic PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis. Upon transformation, the nitA gene was located on the selectable marker vector, whereas the G-Luc was located on the second, co-transformed vector. The recipient strain TNit-1013 was used as a negative control. This PCR assay was performed more than 15 generations after the transformation of the strains to also test genetic stability. (A) The nitA-specific primers can bind to both the endogenous defective nitA gene and the functional nitA inserted during transformation, but different fragment sizes result. The defective nitA yields a 459 bp fragment, and the inserted nitA yields a 278 bp fragment. The reason for the size difference is that the fragment from the endogenous defective nitA contains the tenth nitA intron (181 bp), which is not present in the inserted functional version of nitA. If the inserted nitA is present in a transformant, the smaller 278 bp fragment prevails over the larger 459 bp fragment during PCR amplification. Since the recipient strain TNit-1013 has only the defective endogenous nitA gene, the larger, intron-containing 459 bp fragment is expected in this strain. (B) The G-Luc-specific primers can only bind to the reporter gene inserted during co-transformation. PCR amplification is expected to result in a 344 bp fragment if G-Luc is present. M-lanes refer to the molecular-weight marker, and the sizes of the marker bands are indicated on the left.
Genes 14 01389 g004
Genes 14 01389 g005 550
Figure 5. Fast luciferase screening assay of V. carteri transformants. Potential co-transformants that survived growth selection carried out with nitrate as the sole source of nitrogen were screened for expression of the G-Luc reporter gene under control of the PCY1 promoter and the PFP promoter, separately, by measuring the luciferase activity. The chemiluminescence of cell lysates of the strains studied was detected immediately after the addition of the coelenterazine substrate, using a chemiluminescence imager. The chemiluminescence was integrated over three different exposure times (exp1 to exp3), allowing for a semiquantitative evaluation of the luciferase activity. Bright field photographs of the lysate samples document the amount of chlorophyll in each sample, reflecting the number of cells used, and show that all wells were loaded with comparable numbers of the cell lysates. The bar chart shows the relative brightness of all samples as a measure of luciferase activity and indicates whether luciferase activity above the background is not measurable (−) or can be measured (+) or whether there are only traces of activity ((+)). Both the wild-type strain Eve10 and the recipient strain TNit-1013 were used as negative controls because they cannot show luciferase activity and, thus, define the background level of the signal. For comparison of activity and genotype, the top row shows the result of genomic PCR to detect genome integration of G-Luc (Figure 4).
Figure 5. Fast luciferase screening assay of V. carteri transformants. Potential co-transformants that survived growth selection carried out with nitrate as the sole source of nitrogen were screened for expression of the G-Luc reporter gene under control of the PCY1 promoter and the PFP promoter, separately, by measuring the luciferase activity. The chemiluminescence of cell lysates of the strains studied was detected immediately after the addition of the coelenterazine substrate, using a chemiluminescence imager. The chemiluminescence was integrated over three different exposure times (exp1 to exp3), allowing for a semiquantitative evaluation of the luciferase activity. Bright field photographs of the lysate samples document the amount of chlorophyll in each sample, reflecting the number of cells used, and show that all wells were loaded with comparable numbers of the cell lysates. The bar chart shows the relative brightness of all samples as a measure of luciferase activity and indicates whether luciferase activity above the background is not measurable (−) or can be measured (+) or whether there are only traces of activity ((+)). Both the wild-type strain Eve10 and the recipient strain TNit-1013 were used as negative controls because they cannot show luciferase activity and, thus, define the background level of the signal. For comparison of activity and genotype, the top row shows the result of genomic PCR to detect genome integration of G-Luc (Figure 4).
Genes 14 01389 g005
Genes 14 01389 g006 550
Figure 6. Quantification of PCY1 or PFP promoter activity at the transcriptional level in gonidia and somatic cells of V. carteri transformants. Gonidia and somatic cells of transformants expressing the reporter gene G-Luc under control of the PCY1 and PFP promoters, respectively, were mechanically separated just before the onset of cell division. Total RNA was extracted, and mRNA expression was determined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. The relative transcriptional expression level reflects PCY1- or PFP-driven expression of G-Luc relative to the expression of the reference gene tbpA in the respective cell type. The calculation was performed using the 2−ΔCt method. (A) Exemplary dark-field micrograph of separated gonidia. (B) Exemplary dark-field micrograph of separated somatic cell sheets. (C) Relative transcriptional expression of G-Luc under control of the PCY1 promoter in transformant strain PCY1-26-2. The PCY1 promoter causes overexpression of the reporter gene in gonidia, which is 57-fold higher than its expression in somatic cells. (D) Relative transcriptional expression of G-Luc under control of the PFP promoter in transformant strain PFP-1-5. The PFP promoter causes overexpression of the reporter gene in somatic cells, which is 69-fold higher than its expression in gonidia. The data represent three biological replicates with three technical replicates each. Error bars indicate standard deviations.
Figure 6. Quantification of PCY1 or PFP promoter activity at the transcriptional level in gonidia and somatic cells of V. carteri transformants. Gonidia and somatic cells of transformants expressing the reporter gene G-Luc under control of the PCY1 and PFP promoters, respectively, were mechanically separated just before the onset of cell division. Total RNA was extracted, and mRNA expression was determined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. The relative transcriptional expression level reflects PCY1- or PFP-driven expression of G-Luc relative to the expression of the reference gene tbpA in the respective cell type. The calculation was performed using the 2−ΔCt method. (A) Exemplary dark-field micrograph of separated gonidia. (B) Exemplary dark-field micrograph of separated somatic cell sheets. (C) Relative transcriptional expression of G-Luc under control of the PCY1 promoter in transformant strain PCY1-26-2. The PCY1 promoter causes overexpression of the reporter gene in gonidia, which is 57-fold higher than its expression in somatic cells. (D) Relative transcriptional expression of G-Luc under control of the PFP promoter in transformant strain PFP-1-5. The PFP promoter causes overexpression of the reporter gene in somatic cells, which is 69-fold higher than its expression in gonidia. The data represent three biological replicates with three technical replicates each. Error bars indicate standard deviations.
Genes 14 01389 g006
Genes 14 01389 g007 550
Figure 7. Quantification of PCY1- or PFP-regulated luciferase enzyme activity in gonidia and somatic cells of V. carteri transformants. The separated cell types of three independent transformant strains expressing the G-Luc reporter gene under control of (A) the PCY1 promoter and (B) the PFP promoter, separately, were analyzed for luciferase activity. The bar chart shows the relative brightness of all samples in relative light units (rlu) as a measure of luciferase activity. The wild-type strain Eve10 was used as a negative control. To allow for a quantitative comparison of the luciferase activities, the determined enzyme activities of all samples were normalized with the respective chlorophyll content, which reflects the number of cells used. Columns represent the mean of three biological replicates with three technical replicates each. Error bars indicate standard deviations.
Figure 7. Quantification of PCY1- or PFP-regulated luciferase enzyme activity in gonidia and somatic cells of V. carteri transformants. The separated cell types of three independent transformant strains expressing the G-Luc reporter gene under control of (A) the PCY1 promoter and (B) the PFP promoter, separately, were analyzed for luciferase activity. The bar chart shows the relative brightness of all samples in relative light units (rlu) as a measure of luciferase activity. The wild-type strain Eve10 was used as a negative control. To allow for a quantitative comparison of the luciferase activities, the determined enzyme activities of all samples were normalized with the respective chlorophyll content, which reflects the number of cells used. Columns represent the mean of three biological replicates with three technical replicates each. Error bars indicate standard deviations.
Genes 14 01389 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

von der Heyde, B.; von der Heyde, E.L.; Hallmann, A. Cell Type-Specific Promoters of Volvox carteri for Molecular Cell Biology Studies. Genes 2023, 14, 1389. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071389

AMA Style

von der Heyde B, von der Heyde EL, Hallmann A. Cell Type-Specific Promoters of Volvox carteri for Molecular Cell Biology Studies. Genes. 2023; 14(7):1389. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071389

Chicago/Turabian Style

von der Heyde, Benjamin, Eva Laura von der Heyde, and Armin Hallmann. 2023. "Cell Type-Specific Promoters of Volvox carteri for Molecular Cell Biology Studies" Genes 14, no. 7: 1389. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071389

APA Style

von der Heyde, B., von der Heyde, E. L., & Hallmann, A. (2023). Cell Type-Specific Promoters of Volvox carteri for Molecular Cell Biology Studies. Genes, 14(7), 1389. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071389

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop