Next Article in Journal
Assessing myBaits Target Capture Sequencing Methodology Using Short-Read Sequencing for Variant Detection in Oat Genomics and Breeding
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Barley yellow mosaic virus Isolates Breaking rym3 Resistance in Japan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Identification of a Novel Frameshift Variant in MYF5 Leading to External Ophthalmoplegia with Rib and Vertebral Anomalies

1
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London EC1V 9EL, UK
2
UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London EC1V 9EL, UK
3
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 9JH, UK
4
Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2024, 15(6), 699; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15060699
Submission received: 28 April 2024 / Revised: 16 May 2024 / Accepted: 25 May 2024 / Published: 27 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases)

Abstract

:
Myogenic transcription factors with a basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) such as MYOD, myogenin, MRF4, and MYF5 contribute to muscle differentiation and regulation. The MYF5 gene located on chromosome 12 encodes for myogenic factor 5 (MYF5), which has a role in skeletal and extraocular muscle development and rib formation. Variants in MYF5 were found to cause external ophthalmoplegia with rib and vertebral anomalies (EORVA), a rare recessive condition. To date, three homozygous variants in MYF5 have been reported to cause EORVA in six members of four unrelated families. Here, we present a novel homozygous MYF5 frameshift variant, c.596dupA p. (Asn199Lysfs*49), causing premature protein termination and presenting with external ophthalmoplegia, ptosis, and scoliosis in three siblings from a consanguineous family of Pakistani origin. With four MYF5 variants now discovered, genetic testing and paediatric assessment for extra-ocular features should be considered in all cases of congenital ophthalmoplegia.

1. Introduction

During mammalian development, skeletal muscle differentiation is regionalised with skeletal muscles of the trunk, limbs, diaphragm, and tongue derived from somites, while the craniofacial muscles, including extraocular muscles (EOM), originate from prechordal and paraxial mesoderm [1]. In the case of disease or injury, skeletal muscles can be regenerated by myogenic precursor cells called satellite cells [2,3]. EOM are more complex than limb skeletal muscles with smaller motor units, higher mitochondrial content, increased blood flow from a dense vascular bed, and co-expression of several myosin isoforms. They are the fastest contracting muscles in the human body and are highly resistant to fatigue [4,5].
Embryonic and post-natal myogenesis of skeletal muscle and EOM is regulated by four basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcription factors: MYF5, MYOD, MYOG (also called myogenin), and MRF4 (also called MYF6 or herculin) [6,7,8,9,10]. MYF5 is the first myogenic factor to be expressed; in mice, Myf5 expression occurs around embryonic day 8 (E8), preceding somite differentiation into the dermis, axial muscles, vertebrae, and ribs [11]. Myf5 or Mrf4 activates myogenesis via MyoD expression, which initiates MyoG expression [12,13,14,15,16] (Figure 1).
Disruption of the Myf5 gene in mice causes abnormal development of the distal parts of the ribs and postnatal death due to respiratory distress [15]. Studies on mice carrying heterozygous variants in Myf5 in trans with a second heterozygous variant in Mrf4 (Myf5+/m1 Mrf4+/bh1) showed severe rib anomalies and undetectable myotome formation, similar to Myf5 knockout models [17]. Homozygous Mrf4 mutants also exhibit rib defects, but the most severe rib anomalies are present in Myf5 null models [17,18]. Myf5 mutant mice with normal expression of Myod1, MyoG, and Mrf4 develop normal skeletal muscles, but are lethal due to an inability to breathe [15]. Inserting MyoG cDNA into the Myf5 locus via homologous recombination leads to partial phenotypic rescue, with development of a normal rib cage in MyoG knock-in mice [19]. In mice lacking both MYF5 and MYOD transcription factors, no skeletal muscles were formed, and mice died postnatally within minutes from birth. The presence of a healthy copy of either MyoD or Myf5 in mutant mice led to partial or full skeletal muscle development [7].
Congenital fibrosis of extraocular muscles (CFEOM) characterises a non-progressive congenital ophthalmoplegia with or without ptosis. It is a development disorder primarily affecting cranial nerves (a cranial innervation disorder) and results in fibrosis and hypoplasia of innervated EOMs. It can be inherited in an autosomal dominant or autosomal recessive manner and there are five types; types 1 and 3 are autosomal dominant, whilst types 2, 4, and 5 are inherited recessively. Six genes are known to be associated with this condition: COL25A1, KIF21A2, PHOX2A, TUBA1A, TUBB2B, and TUBB3. Systemic features can present as neurodevelopmental, brain, or limb anomalies, including reduced numbers of fingers or toes (oligodactyly).
External ophthalmoplegia with rib and vertebral abnormalities (EORVA) is a rare autosomal recessive disease associated with MYF5 variants and is characterised by congenital, non-progressive ophthalmoplegia and ptosis, with vertebral and rib anomalies, scoliosis, and torticollis. First described in 2018, Di Goia et al. reported three families presenting with this condition caused by biallelic mutations in the MYF5 gene (OMIM # 159990) located on 12q21.31 [20]. Unlike CFEOM, the primary pathology is not neurological but originates in the muscle. The characteristic ocular features are similar in both EORVA and CFEOM. Overlooking mild systemic features that differ in both these conditions can lead to misdiagnosis and suboptimal management (Table 1). Ocular management in EORVA and CFEOM include monitoring and correction of refractive error and amblyopia; in some cases, surgery to correct ptosis or extraocular muscles alignment should be considered. Management of systemic complications will vary depending on presenting features and include multidisciplinary management and the involvement of a paediatrician.
Herein, we describe a novel homozygous c.596dupA variant in the MYF5 gene associated with EORVA in three siblings from a consanguineous family of Pakistani origin.

2. Case Description

Two brothers aged 8 (IV-1) and 7 years (IV-2), and their younger sister aged 4 years (IV-3) from a consanguineous family of Pakistani origin were referred to the genetic eye disease clinic at Moorfields Eye Hospital (MEH) with a diagnosis of CFEOM. Their parents were unaffected (Figure 2).
Patient IV-1 first presented to a general paediatric ophthalmology service aged six months with left exotropia, left hypertropia, and ophthalmoplegia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head and orbits showed smaller left medial rectus, superior rectus and superior oblique muscles compared to the contralateral side, leading to a presumed diagnosis of CFEOM (Figure 3J). At most recent presentation, age 8 years, his ophthalmic examination showed a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.00 LogMAR in the right and 0.30 LogMAR in the left eye (Table 2). Orthoptic assessment showed constant left exotropia, bilateral ophthalmoplegia, chin elevation, and mild bilateral ptosis. Anterior and posterior segment examination showed no abnormalities. Optos imaging and optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the macula showed no abnormalities (Figure 3M).
Patient IV-2 presented to a general paediatric ophthalmology clinic at 23 months with ophthalmoplegia. There were no notable concerns regarding intellect or development. At age 7 years, his ocular examination showed BCVA of 0.00 LogMAR in the right and 0.08 LogMAR in the left eye, a constant right alternating exotropia, bilateral ophthalmoplegia, and mild bilateral ptosis (Table 2). Anterior and posterior segment examination was within normal limits.
Patient IV-3 was originally found to have restricted eye movements aged four months. She had normal intellect but there were some minor concerns about clumsiness; her neurological examination was unremarkable but mild in-toeing was noted. At age 4 years BCVA was 0.24 LogMAR in each eye. An intermittent distance left exotropia was detected with bilateral ophthalmoplegia and mild right-sided ptosis (Table 2). Anterior and posterior segment examination was normal, Optos imaging and OCT scans were within normal limits.
Previously reported variants in MYF5 were known to cause external ophthalmoplegia, with vertebral and rib anomalies [18]. Therefore, following the genetic results, patients IV-1, IV-2, and IV-3 were assessed by a developmental paediatrician to look for syndromic features, in particular torticollis, scoliosis, spinal, and rib cage or chest abnormalities, none of which were found on physical examination. Neurological examination and growth indices were within normal limits. Patients were referred for spinal X-rays to investigate for radiological evidence of ribcage and spinal abnormalities. Varying degrees of thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar scoliosis were reported in all three patients (Figure 3C,D).

3. Genetic Testing

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study through the Genetic Study of Inherited Eye Disease (REC reference 12/LO/0141). A clinical exome (Agilent SureSelect Focused Exome +1 capture) for Patient IV-1 was performed on the Illumina NextSeq 500 platform, with sequence data generated across the full capture region of greater than 5000 genes. Next-generation sequencing analysis was then performed for a virtual panel of coding exons (+/− 20 bp) of 14 genes associated with eye movement disorders (EMD_v2 panel, North East Thames Regional Genetics Laboratory: CHN1, COL25A1, DCC, FRMD7, HOXA1, HOXB1, KIF21A, MAFB, PHOX2A, ROBO3, SALL1, SALL4, TUBB2B, TUBB3). Larger insertion/deletion mutations and copy variants were analysed using ExomeDepth. Variants were filtered according to minor allele frequency (>2%) from 1000G, ExAC or EVS databases.). No pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified. Variants in non-coding regions that could affect gene expression could not be excluded.
Both brothers IV-1 and IV-2 were subsequently recruited to the Genomics England 100,000 Genomes Project together with their unaffected parents for whole genome sequencing as previously described [21,22]. Both brothers were found to be homozygous, and the unaffected parents heterozygous carriers for a novel duplication c.596dupA in the MYF5 gene resulting in a frameshift variant p.(Asn199Lysfs*49). Targeted sequence analysis of the MYF5 variant confirmed the 100,000 Genome Project findings. The third affected sibling, IV-3, underwent familial MYF5 testing and was found to be homozygous for the same variant. In the gnomAD population database, this variant was found at heterozygous state in two individuals (f = 0.00000124) and has not been described before at homozygous state.
According to ACMG variant classification guidelines, MYF5 c.596dupA is likely pathogenic. It is a null variant in a gene where loss of function is the presumed mechanism of disease and the variant results in a reduction of more than 10% of the protein (PVS1 strong). The variant is present in only two alleles (no homozygotes) in the gnomAD v4.0 database (PM2 moderate). In vitro studies would help confirm if any residual function of the truncated protein is present and would help to upgrade the classification.

4. Discussion

Here we present the three siblings with EORVA (non-progressive ophthalmoplegia, ptosis, and scoliosis), without vertebrae anomalies and torticollis, caused by a novel homozygous MYF5 frameshift variant, c.596dupA, p.(Asn199Lysfs*49), in exon 3. Three MYF5 variants have been previously reported to be associated with EORVA in six members of four unrelated families: (i) deletion c.23_32del p.(Gln8Leufs*86); (ii) deletion c.191del p.(Ala64Valfs*33); and (iii) missense variant c.283C>T p.(Arg95Cys), all located in exon 1 (Figure 4, Table 3) [18,21].
The homozygous 10bp deletion, c.23_32del, in exon 1 was reported in a brother, age 9 years, and his sister, age 19 years, of Turkish descent from unaffected consanguineous first cousins. Both exhibited external ophthalmoplegia, ptosis, squint, scoliosis, torticollis, and dysmorphic hypoplastic ribs. The same variant c.23_32del was discovered in another 16-year-old male from the same village, with similar ocular and vertebral features, and pectus carinatum [20]. The c.23_32del variant appears to exert a more severe extra-ocular phenotype compared to our reported c.596dup variant, where scoliosis was the only skeletal feature detected on X-ray imaging. The c.191del variant in exon 1 was found in an 8-year-old Chinese boy with paternal uniparental disomy. Extra-ocular features included scoliosis and hypoplastic ribs. This patient had a milder ocular phenotype with only ptosis reported: however, the ocular features were not provided in detail [23].
The two frameshift variants in exon 1, c.23_32del p.(Gln8Leufs*86) and c.191del p.(Ala64Valfs*33), introduce a premature termination codon (PTC) at least 280 nucleotides after the start codon. These PTCs are predicted to be sensitive to nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) [25,26], leading to degradation of mRNA and an absence of the MYF5 protein.
The missense variant p.(Arg95Cys) forms a full-length protein and has been associated with EORVA in two members of one Yemeni family [20,24]. In vitro and in silico assays reported that mutant MYF5 is mislocalised to the cytoplasm and has lost its DNA binding ability [20]. Even if the consequence of the mutation on the protein differs between null or truncated protein with an alternative C-terminus, only a few EORVA patients have been described and a larger cohort of patients are required for more significant genotype–phenotype correlation.
Several mouse models have shown that rib morphogenesis is indirectly affected by Mrf4 and Myf5 expression via fibroblast growth factor (Fgf) and platelet-derived growth factor (Pdgf) mediation in myotome–sclerotome interactions. Myf5/Mrf4 activation in hypaxial myotome signals to the adjacent sclerotome using Pdgf and Fgf to promote rib and vertebrae formation [14,27,28]. Mice lacking Pdgfra, the gene encoding the Pdgf receptor, have severe rib anomalies [29]. In addition, insertion of Pdgfra cDNA into the Myf5 locus results in increased rib and vertebral development [14]. The genes encoding MRF4 and MYF5 are closely linked, with approximately 8.5kb separating their coding sequences on human chromosome 12 [30,31,32], and cis-acting interaction of MRF4 negatively impacts expression of adjacent MYF5 [17,18]. A Mrf4 knockout mouse model exhibits rib defects and lacks Myf5 expression. Rib anomalies are more severe in compound heterozygote Myf5/Mrf4 than Mrf4 knockout models, and the most severe are in Myf5 homozygous mutants [15,17,33] (Table 4). These mouse models did not examine the influence of Myf5/Mrf4 on extraocular muscle function. Rib development is highly sensitive to quantitative difference in MYF5 function [15,17].
After a genetic diagnosis, detailed phenotyping is important to assess for features that can aid diagnosis and provide clinical evidence in support of variant pathogenicity. Our cases presented with a presumptive diagnosis of CFEOM due to characteristic features of ophthalmoplegia and ptosis, however, radiology revealed scoliosis in all three patients, which revised the diagnosis to EORVA. Recognition of these additional features allows for a multi-disciplinary approach to provide the best possible care for the patients in the long-term.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we report three siblings of consanguineous parents with a novel homozygous variant c.596dupA p.(Asn199Lysfs*49) in exon 3 of MYF5 associated with EORVA, a newly recognised syndrome easily mistaken for CFEOM, which has a different pathogenesis and systemic implications. With four EORVA-associated variants now discovered, it is important to perform genetic testing on patients with external ophthalmoplegia with and without extra-ocular features. Our family had no extra-ocular abnormalities on clinical examination, but genetic results prompted further radiological investigation, revealing scoliosis in all affected members. Patients with signs of ocular fibrosis, especially with a family history of ophthalmoplegia should undergo genetic testing and be referred to paediatric services for a full work up.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, P.O., N.O. and M.M.; methodology, P.O., N.O., C.M., E.S., V.T. and M.M.; investigation, P.O., N.O. and M.M.; resources, P.O., C.M. and V.T.; writing—original draft preparation, P.O., N.O., E.S. and C.M.; writing—review and editing, V.T. and M.M.; supervision, M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by the Wellcome Trust (grant no. 205174/Z/16/Z). We gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of MEH and the Northwest London Research Ethics Committee (REC reference 12/LO/0141, approval date 30 September 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study through the Genetic Study of Inherited Eye Disease (REC reference 12/LO/0141).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Francetic, T.; Li, Q. Skeletal myogenesis and Myf5 activation. Transcription 2011, 2, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Porter, J.D.; Baker, R.S. Muscles of a different “color”: The unusual properties of the extraocular muscles may predispose or protect them in neurogenic and myogenic disease. Neurology 1996, 46, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Verma, M.; Fitzpatrick, K.R.; McLoon, L.K. Extraocular Muscle Repair and Regeneration. Curr. Ophthalmol. Rep. 2017, 5, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kjellgren, D.; Thornell, L.-E.; Andersen, J.; Pedrosa-Domellöf, F. Myosin Heavy Chain Isoforms in Human Extraocular Muscles. Investig. Opthalmology Vis. Sci. 2003, 44, 1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fischer, M.D.; Gorospe, J.R.; Felder, E.; Bogdanovich, S.; Pedrosa-Domellöf, F.; Ahima, R.S.; Rubinstein, N.A.; Hoffman, E.P.; Khurana, T.S. Expression profiling reveals metabolic and structural components of extraocular muscles. Physiol. Genomics 2002, 9, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hernández-Hernández, J.M.; García-González, E.G.; Brun, C.E.; Rudnicki, M.A. The myogenic regulatory factors, determinants of muscle development, cell identity and regeneration. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2017, 72, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rudnicki, M.A.; Schnegelsberg, P.N.J.; Stead, R.H.; Braun, T.; Arnold, H.-H.; Jaenisch, R. MyoD or Myf-5 is required for the formation of skeletal muscle. Cell 1993, 75, 1351–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sassoon, D.; Lyons, G.E.; Wright, W.E.; Lin, V.; Lassar, A.B.; Weintraub, H.; Buckingham, M. Expression of two myogenic regulatory factors myogenin and MyoDl during mouse embryogenesis. Nature 1989, 341, 303–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hinterberger, T.J.; Sassoon, D.A.; Rhodes, S.J.; Konieczny, S.F. Expression of the muscle regulatory factor MRF4 during somite and skeletal myofiber development. Dev. Biol. 1991, 147, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Montarras, D.; Chelly, J.; Bober, E.; Arnold, H.; O Ott, M.; Gros, F.; Pinset, C. Developmental patterns in the expression of Myf5, MyoD, myogenin, and MRF4 during myogenesis. New Biol. 1991, 3, 592–600. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ott, M.O.; Bober, E.; Lyons, G.; Arnold, H.; Buckingham, M. Early expression of the myogenic regulatory gene, myf-5, in precursor cells of skeletal muscle in the mouse embryo. Development 1991, 111, 1097–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sambasivan, R.; Gayraud-Morel, B.; Dumas, G.; Cimper, C.; Paisant, S.; Kelly, R.G.; Tajbakhsh, S. Distinct Regulatory Cascades Govern Extraocular and Pharyngeal Arch Muscle Progenitor Cell Fates. Dev. Cell 2009, 16, 810–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kassar-Duchossoy, L.; Gayraud-Morel, B.; Gomès, D.; Rocancourt, D.; Buckingham, M.; Shinin, V.; Tajbakhsh, S. Mrf4 determines skeletal muscle identity in Myf5:Myod double-mutant mice. Nature 2004, 431, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tallquist, M.D.; Weismann, K.E.; Hellstrom, M.; Soriano, P. Early myotome specification regulates PDGFA expression and axial skeleton development. Development 2000, 127, 5059–5070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Braun, T.; Rudnicki, M.A.; Arnold, H.-H.; Jaenisch, R. Targeted inactivation of the muscle regulatory gene Myf-5 results in abnormal rib development and perinatal death. Cell 1992, 71, 369–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Braun, T.; Gautel, M. Transcriptional mechanisms regulating skeletal muscle differentiation, growth and homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yoon, J.K.; Olson, E.N.; Arnold, H.-H.; Wold, B.J. DifferentMRF4Knockout Alleles Differentially Disrupt Myf-5 Expression:cis-Regulatory Interactions at theMRF4/Myf-5Locus. Dev. Biol. 1997, 188, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Olson, E.N.; Arnold, H.-H.; Rigby, P.W.J.; Wold, B.J. Know Your Neighbors: Three Phenotypes in Null Mutants of the Myogenic bHLH Gene MRF4. Cell 1996, 85, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wang, Y.; Schnegelsberg, P.N.J.; Dausman, J.; Jaenisch, R. Functional redundancy of the muscle-specific transcription factors Myf5 and myogenin. Nature 1996, 379, 823–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Di Gioia, S.A.; Shaaban, S.; Tüysüz, B.; Elcioglu, N.H.; Chan, W.-M.; Robson, C.D.; Ecklund, K.; Gilette, N.M.; Hamzaoglu, A.; Tayfun, G.A.; et al. Recessive MYF5 Mutations Cause External Ophthalmoplegia, Rib, and Vertebral Anomalies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2018, 103, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Turnbull, C.; Scott, R.H.; Thomas, E.; Jones, L.; Murugaesu, N.; Pretty, F.B.; Halai, D.; Baple, E.; Craig, C.; Hamblin, A.; et al. The 100,000 Genomes Project: Bringing whole genome sequencing to the NHS. BMJ 2018, 361, k1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Schiff, E.R.; Tailor, V.K.; Chan, H.W.; Theodorou, M.; Webster, A.R.; Moosajee, M. Novel Biallelic Variants and Phenotypic Features in Patients with SLC38A8-Related Foveal Hypoplasia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, Q.; Zhu, X.; Yu, C.; Shang, L.; Li, R.; Wang, X.; Yang, Y.; Meng, J.; Kong, X. Case Report: A Novel Homozygous Mutation in MYF5 Due to Paternal Uniparental Isodisomy of Chromosome 12 in a Case of External Ophthalmoplegia with Rib and Vertebral Anomalies. Front. Genet. 2022, 12, 780363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Traboulsi, E.I.; Lee, B.A.; Mousawi, A.; Khamis, A.R.; Engle, E.C. Evidence of genetic heterogeneity in autosomal recessive congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles11Genetic study was performed in the Division of Genetics, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2000, 129, 658–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lindeboom, R.G.H.; Supek, F.; Lehner, B. The rules and impact of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in human cancers. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 1112–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kurosaki, T.; Maquat, L.E. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in humans at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2016, 129, jcs.181008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, R.; Stolte, D.; Kurz, H.; Ehehalt, F.; Cann, G.M.; E Stockdale, F.; Patel, K.; Christ, B. Ventral axial organs regulate expression of myotomal Fgf-8 that influences rib development. Dev. Biol. 2003, 255, 30–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Vinagre, T.; Moncaut, N.; Carapuço, M.; Nóvoa, A.; Bom, J.; Mallo, M. Evidence for a Myotomal HOX/Myf Cascade Governing Nonautonomous Control of Rib Specification within Global Vertebral Domains. Dev. Cell 2010, 18, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Soriano, P. The PDGFα receptor is required for neural crest cell development and for normal patterning of the somites. Development 1997, 124, 2691–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Braun, T.; Bober, E.; Winter, B.; Rosenthal, N.; Arnold, H.H. Myf-6, a new member of the human gene family of myogenic determination factors: Evidence for a gene cluster on chromosome 12. EMBO J. 1990, 9, 821–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Patapoutian, A.; Miner, J.H.; Lyons, G.E.; Wold, B. Isolated sequences from the linked Myf-5 and MRF4 genes drive distinct patterns of muscle-specific expression in transgenic mice. Development 1993, 118, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Carvajal, J.J.; Cox, D.; Summerbell, D.; Rigby, P.W. A BAC transgenic analysis of the Mrf4/Myf5 locus reveals interdigitated elements that control activation and maintenance of gene expression during muscle development. Development 2001, 128, 1857–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, W.; Behringer, R.R.; Olson, E.N. Inactivation of the myogenic bHLH gene MRF4 results in up-regulation of myogenin and rib anomalies. Genes Dev. 1995, 9, 1388–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Patapoutian, A.; Yoon, J.K.; Miner, J.H.; Wang, S.; Stark, K.; Wold, B. Disruption of the mouse MRF4 gene identifies multiple waves of myogenesis in the myotome. Development 1995, 121, 3347–3358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The role of myogenic transcription factors in extraocular myogenesis in mice. Extraocular muscles (EOM) are derived from cranial mesoderm progenitors. Expression of either Myf5 or Mrf4 is required for EOM progenitor cells to acquire their myogenic fate. Myf5 or Mrf4 activates MyoD, which in turn activates MyoG and EOM differentiation. Created with Biorender.
Figure 1. The role of myogenic transcription factors in extraocular myogenesis in mice. Extraocular muscles (EOM) are derived from cranial mesoderm progenitors. Expression of either Myf5 or Mrf4 is required for EOM progenitor cells to acquire their myogenic fate. Myf5 or Mrf4 activates MyoD, which in turn activates MyoG and EOM differentiation. Created with Biorender.
Genes 15 00699 g001
Figure 2. Family pedigree—three siblings from a consanguineous Pakistani family are affected with external ophthalmoplegia, with vertebral and rib anomalies. Square symbols indicate males; circles indicate females. Diamonds represent either gender. The number inside the shape is the number of individuals. Filled symbols are affected individuals. The black arrow indicates the proband.
Figure 2. Family pedigree—three siblings from a consanguineous Pakistani family are affected with external ophthalmoplegia, with vertebral and rib anomalies. Square symbols indicate males; circles indicate females. Diamonds represent either gender. The number inside the shape is the number of individuals. Filled symbols are affected individuals. The black arrow indicates the proband.
Genes 15 00699 g002
Figure 3. (A) Facial photo; (B) dental photo; (C) Patient IV-1 skeletal X-ray, antero-posterior view- mild thoracic scoliosis centred at T6-T7 concave to the left; (D) Patient IV-1 skeletal X-ray, lateral (L) view; gaze position photos (N.B. not all positions of gaze were obtained due to ptosis obscuring eye position); (E) dextro-elevation; (F) direct elevation; (G) laevo elevation; (H) primary position; (I) laevo version; (J) MRI orbits Patient IV-1: left medial rectus, left superior rectus, and left superior oblique muscles smaller comparing to respective EOMs in the right eye; (K) colour fundus photo; (L) autofluorescence photo; (M) macular OCT.
Figure 3. (A) Facial photo; (B) dental photo; (C) Patient IV-1 skeletal X-ray, antero-posterior view- mild thoracic scoliosis centred at T6-T7 concave to the left; (D) Patient IV-1 skeletal X-ray, lateral (L) view; gaze position photos (N.B. not all positions of gaze were obtained due to ptosis obscuring eye position); (E) dextro-elevation; (F) direct elevation; (G) laevo elevation; (H) primary position; (I) laevo version; (J) MRI orbits Patient IV-1: left medial rectus, left superior rectus, and left superior oblique muscles smaller comparing to respective EOMs in the right eye; (K) colour fundus photo; (L) autofluorescence photo; (M) macular OCT.
Genes 15 00699 g003
Figure 4. Mutational spectrum of MYF5 related external ophthalmoplegia, with vertebral and rib anomalies. (A) Variants previously described depicted across exon 1 of MYF5 gene (NM_005593.3), while the novel disease-causing variant reported in this study is located in exon 3. (B) Amino acid changes mapped across MYF5 transcription factor (NP_005584, UniProt P13349); bHLH-basic helix–loop–helix protein domain (amino acid residue 83 to 134) binding DNA. The novel disease-causing variant reported in this study is indicated in bold. Asterisk (*) indicates premature termination (stop) codon.
Figure 4. Mutational spectrum of MYF5 related external ophthalmoplegia, with vertebral and rib anomalies. (A) Variants previously described depicted across exon 1 of MYF5 gene (NM_005593.3), while the novel disease-causing variant reported in this study is located in exon 3. (B) Amino acid changes mapped across MYF5 transcription factor (NP_005584, UniProt P13349); bHLH-basic helix–loop–helix protein domain (amino acid residue 83 to 134) binding DNA. The novel disease-causing variant reported in this study is indicated in bold. Asterisk (*) indicates premature termination (stop) codon.
Genes 15 00699 g004
Table 1. Similarities and differences between CFEOM and EORVA. CFEOM: congenital fibrosis of extraocular muscles; EORVA: external ophthalmoplegia with rib and vertebral anomalies. Phenotypic differences between CFEOM and EORVA are highlighted in bold.
Table 1. Similarities and differences between CFEOM and EORVA. CFEOM: congenital fibrosis of extraocular muscles; EORVA: external ophthalmoplegia with rib and vertebral anomalies. Phenotypic differences between CFEOM and EORVA are highlighted in bold.
ConditionCFEOMEORVA
PathophysiologyCranial innervation disorderMuscle disorder
Ocular featuresNon-progressive ophthalmoplegia
+/− ptosis
Non-progressive ophthalmoplegia
+/− ptosis
Extra-ocular featuresNeurodevelopmental anomalies
Brain anomalies
Limb anomalies
Rib defects
Vertebral defects
Scoliosis
Torticollis
InheritanceAutosomal recessive or autosomal dominantAutosomal recessive
Causative genesCOL25A1; KIF21A2; PHOX2A; TUBA1A; TUBB2B; TUBB3MYF5
Table 2. Orthoptic and ophthalmic examination of Patient IV-1, Patient IV-2, and Patient IV-3. Abbreviations: M: months; Y: years; BC-RVA: best corrected right visual acuity (logMAR); BC-LVA: best corrected left visual acuity (logMAR); R: right eye; L: left eye; LXT: left exotropia; R/AXT: right/alternating exotropia; r/o: restriction of; B/L: bilateral.
Table 2. Orthoptic and ophthalmic examination of Patient IV-1, Patient IV-2, and Patient IV-3. Abbreviations: M: months; Y: years; BC-RVA: best corrected right visual acuity (logMAR); BC-LVA: best corrected left visual acuity (logMAR); R: right eye; L: left eye; LXT: left exotropia; R/AXT: right/alternating exotropia; r/o: restriction of; B/L: bilateral.
IDAge at PresentationAge at Last ExamBC-RVA
BC-LVARefractive
Error
StrabismusTorticollisOcular MotilityPtosisAnterior SegmentPosterior Segment
Pt IV-16M8Y0.000.30R: +1.00/−0.50 × 180
L: +1.75/−1.75 × 180
Constant LXTChin elevationB/L marked r/o elevation
B/L small r/o depression
R minimal r/o abduction
R moderate r/o adduction
L minimal r/o adduction
L small r/o abduction
Mild
B/L
NormalNormal
Pt IV-223M7Y0.000.08R: +1.50DS
L: +0.75DS
Constant R/AXTNilB/L moderate r/o elevation
B/L minimal r/o adduction
Mild
B/L
NormalNormal
Pt IV-34M4Y0.240.24R: −1.50DS
L: −0.50/−1.00 × 170
Intermittent Distance LXTNilB/L mild r/o elevation
B/L slight r/o depression
B/L full abduction and adduction
MildR NormalNormal
Pt IV-1Pt IV-2Pt IV-3
Genes 15 00699 i001Genes 15 00699 i002Genes 15 00699 i003
Table 3. Genotype–phenotype correlation in MYF5 variants. Abbreviations: EOM: extraocular muscles; R: right eye; L: left eye; XT: exotropia; HoT: hypotropia; HT: hypertropia; +: mild; ++: moderate; +++: severe; ND: no data; ✔: present; ✘ absent.
Table 3. Genotype–phenotype correlation in MYF5 variants. Abbreviations: EOM: extraocular muscles; R: right eye; L: left eye; XT: exotropia; HoT: hypotropia; HT: hypertropia; +: mild; ++: moderate; +++: severe; ND: no data; ✔: present; ✘ absent.
ReferenceHomozygous MYF5 VariantMYF5 ProteinPatient IDExternal OphthalmoplegiaPtosisStrabismusScoliosisTorticollisRibs AnomaliesVertebral Anomalies
[20]c.23_32delp.Gln8Leufs*86I-1✔ R>LXT++, HoT R+Cervical scoliosis
I-2✔ R>LXT++NDND
I-3✔—EOMs hypoplastic to absent✔ R>LHoT++Cervical and thoracic scoliosis
[23]c.191delCp.Ala64Valfs*33II-1NDNDND
[20,24]c.283C>Tp.Arg95CysIII-1✔ LXT+++ HoT L+NDpossiblyNDND
III-2XT+Lumbar scoliosisNDNDND
This studyc.596dupp.Asn199Lysfs*49IV-1✔—EOMs L hypoplastic comparing to RXT L+Thoracic scoliosis
IV-2XT R+,HT R +Thoracic and lumbar scoliosis
IV-3✔ RXT L+ HT L+Lumbar scoliosis
Table 4. Genotype–phenotype correlation in mice models with rib morphogenesis defects; ND—no data; wt—wild type.
Table 4. Genotype–phenotype correlation in mice models with rib morphogenesis defects; ND—no data; wt—wild type.
Genotype Mice ModelRib Cage DefectsVertebrae Defects
Mrf4−/− [34]Ribs not attached to the sternum
Truncation of ribs
Bifurcation and fusion of adjacent ribs
Irregular sternum ossification
ND
Mrf4−/+Myf5−/+ [17]Ribs not attached to the sternum
Truncation of ribs: shorter vs wt/Mrf4-/-; longer vs. Myf5-/-
Bifurcation and fusion of adjacent ribs
Irregular sternum ossification
ND
Myf5−/− [15]Absence of the distant parts of the ribs
Complete ossification of the sternum
Lethal immediately postnatally (inability to breath)
ND
Pdgfra−/− [29]Ribs mostly attached to the sternum
Bifurcation and fusion of adjacent ribs
Irregular and shorter sternum
Structural anomalies of cervical and thoracic vertebrae
Spina bifida
Anomalies of spinal column curvature
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ocieczek, P.; Oluonye, N.; Méjécase, C.; Schiff, E.; Tailor, V.; Moosajee, M. Identification of a Novel Frameshift Variant in MYF5 Leading to External Ophthalmoplegia with Rib and Vertebral Anomalies. Genes 2024, 15, 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15060699

AMA Style

Ocieczek P, Oluonye N, Méjécase C, Schiff E, Tailor V, Moosajee M. Identification of a Novel Frameshift Variant in MYF5 Leading to External Ophthalmoplegia with Rib and Vertebral Anomalies. Genes. 2024; 15(6):699. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15060699

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ocieczek, Paulina, Ngozi Oluonye, Cécile Méjécase, Elena Schiff, Vijay Tailor, and Mariya Moosajee. 2024. "Identification of a Novel Frameshift Variant in MYF5 Leading to External Ophthalmoplegia with Rib and Vertebral Anomalies" Genes 15, no. 6: 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15060699

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop