Next Article in Journal
Complete Chloroplast Genome of Megacarpaea megalocarpa and Comparative Analysis with Related Species from Brassicaceae
Previous Article in Journal
Somatic Variants Acquired Later in Life Associated with Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms: JAK2 V617F
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 15
Issue 7
10.3390/genes15070885
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Development of a Fluorescent Microsatellite Marker Assay for the Pitaya Canker Pathogen (Neoscytalidium dimidiatum)

by
Rui Li
1,2,
Xi Li
1,2,
Jingcheng Tang
1,2,
Changping Xie
1,2 and
Jianan Wang
1,2,*
1
School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
2
Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control of Tropical Plant Diseases and Pests, Ministry of Education of China, Haikou 570228, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2024, 15(7), 885; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070885
Submission received: 28 May 2024 / Revised: 24 June 2024 / Accepted: 3 July 2024 / Published: 5 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Population and Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pitaya canker, caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum, is a destructive disease that significantly threatens the safety of the pitaya industry. The authors of previous studies have mainly focused on its biological characteristics and chemical control. However, there are no molecular markers available thus far that can be used for the population genetics study of this pathogen. In the present study, a draft genome of N. dimidiatum with a total length of 41.46 MB was assembled in which 9863 coding genes were predicted and annotated. In particular, the microsatellite sequences in the draft genome were investigated. To improve the successful screening rate of potentially polymorphic microsatellite makers, another five N. dimidiatum isolates were resequenced and assembled. A total of eight pairs of polymorphic microsatellite primers were screened out based on the polymorphic microsatellite loci after investigating the sequencing and resequencing assemblies of the six isolates. A total of thirteen representative isolates sampled from different pitaya plantations were genotyped in order to validate the polymorphism of the resulting eight markers. The results indicated that these markers were able to distinguish the isolates well. Lastly, a neighbor-joining tree of 35 isolates, sampled from different pitaya plantations located in different regions, was constructed according to the genotypes of the eight molecular markers. The developed tree indicated that these molecular markers had sufficient genotyping capabilities for our test panel of isolates. In summary, we developed a set of polymorphic microsatellite markers in the following study that can effectively genotype and distinguish N. dimidiatum isolates and be utilized in the population genetics study of N. dimidiatum.

1. Introduction

Pitayas (Hylocereus spp.: Cactaceae), also known as kylin fruit, valentine fruit, and red dragon fruit, are native to tropical areas of North, Central, and South America [1] and are widely cultivated in many tropical and subtropical countries owing to their high nutritional, medicinal, and ornamental value [2,3]. As of December 2020, data from China’s Ministry of Commerce indicate that the planting area of pitayas across the country covers approximately 35,555 hectares [4]. In 2021, the planting area of pitayas in China exceeded 66,667 hectares, and the fruit’s yield exceeded 1.6 million tons, with China becoming the top country worldwide for production [5]. The main planting areas in China include the provinces of Hainan, Guangdong, Guizhou, and Yunnan and the Guangxi autonomous region [6].
Neoscytalidium dimidiatum, the causal agent of pitaya stem canker, can significantly affect pitaya production. The authors of a recently published comprehensive review proposed that N. dimidiatum is synonymous with N. hylocereum, Scytalidium hyalinum, N. novaehollandiae, N. orchidacaearum, etc. [7]. The stem canker of pitaya not only harms plant growth and the quality of fruits but also causes huge economic losses. For example, canker disease became the most significant disease of pitayas in southern Florida in 2015, and symptoms of the disease were particularly evident in fruits, with an incidence of up to 70% [8]. A survey on pitaya diseases in 2014 in Qionghai City of the Hainan Province indicated that the incidence rate of pitaya canker and stem rot reached 100% [9]. To date, there have only been a few studies on the biological characteristics and chemical control of N. dimidiatum [6,10]. From an evolutionary perspective, the population structure of pathogen populations characterizes its evolutionary potential, and high genetic diversity ensures survival and provides strong evolutionary advantages [11]. However, the distinct lack of powerful molecular markers has limited the population genetics studies and risk assessment of this pathogenic population.
Next-generation sequencing (NGS), also known as high-throughput sequencing (HTS), has made it possible to perform deep, high-throughput, and high-quality sequencing of a species of interest and the construction of a draft genome sequence, facilitating our understanding of the derived genetic information from a genomics perspective [12]. In addition, the use of NGS technology has made it possible to leverage a variety of molecular markers in genetics and genomics studies, such as microsatellite markers and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, among others.
A microsatellite sequence (MS), also known as simple sequence repeats (SSRs) or short tandem repeats (STRs) [13], is generated by sliding mismatch during DNA replication or repair or unequal exchange during division [14]. It is generally believed that microsatellites are subject to neutral selection [15]. Because of high mutation rates and neutral selection, a high number of microsatellite alleles may accumulate within the species genome [16]. Thus, microsatellite markers have been widely used as valuable genetic markers; however, genome-wide SNP markers have become popular for use in population genetics studies [17,18]. Using these microsatellite genotype data, we can not only understand the changes in pathogen population structure and genetic diversity but also understand the origin center, transmission route, inheritance migration, or other evolutionary mechanisms of pathogens because microsatellite genotypes are not or are rarely influenced by natural selection during the evolutionary process [11,19].
In the following study, we aimed to use NGS technology to assemble and annotate the draft genome of N. dimidiatum and perform whole-genome resequencing of another five representative isolates of N. dimidiatum collected from different locations in China. The polymorphic microsatellite loci between the draft genome sequences and the other five resequencing assemblies were mined. Finally, a total of eight polymorphic microsatellite markers were screened after examining a set of thirteen representative isolates with broad geographic and genetic backgrounds.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Isolation

The N. dimidiatum isolate HNDZ1920 used for draft genome sequencing was sampled from the stems of a pitaya plant in Danzhou City, Hainan Province, in August 2019. With regard to the other five isolates used for resequencing, three isolates were originally isolated from the diseased and healthy junctions of pitaya stems with typical symptoms of canker collected in Ledong County, Hainan Province; one isolate was isolated from Sanya City, Hainan Province; and the fifth isolate was isolated from Yangjiang City, Guangdong Province (Table 1). The above isolates were recovered from symptomatic tissues taken from diseased plants; samples (0.5 × 0.5 cm) from lesion margins were surface disinfected for 10 min with 0.3% NaClO, plated on potato dextrose agar (PDA), and incubated at 26 °C for five days. All isolates were purified using the single-spore technique, and all of the purified isolates were transferred to and maintained on PDA medium at 28 °C.

2.2. DNA Extraction

The purified isolates were grown on a PDA medium at 28 °C for five days prior to DNA extraction. The mycelium was scraped and ground with liquid nitrogen. The whole-genome DNA was extracted using a Super Plant Genomic DNA Kit (TIANGEN, Cat. No. 4992879), detected via 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, qualified using a Nanodrop microspectrophotometer, and ultimately stored at −20 °C in a refrigerator.

2.3. Isolate Identification

All isolates were determined using morphological and molecular biological methods. Regarding the morphological identification method used, the isolates were inoculated onto the PDA culture plates and incubated for 7 d at 28 °C in an incubator, and the morphology, color, and texture of the colonies were observed and recorded. In particular, the conidia, arthrospores, and chlamydospores were used as the morphological basis for the identification of the pathogens.
After morphological determination, the molecular biology identification approach was utilized to identify the sampled isolates. Specifically, the rDNA ITS and β-tub region of the N. dimidiatum genome were amplified with universal primer pairs ITS1/ITS4 [20] and Bt2a/Bt2b [21]. The primer sequences were as follows: ITS1: 5′-TCCGTAGGAGAACCTGCGG-3′; ITS4: 5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′; Bt2a: 5′-GGTAACCAAATCGGTGCTGCTTTC-3′; and Bt2b: 5′-ACCCTCAGTGTAGTGACCCTTGGC-3′. After PCR applications, 3 μL of the PCR products was detected using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Next, the PCR products were Sanger sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Lastly, a total of 41 sequences belonging to the Botryosphaericeae family were downloaded from the GenBank database (Table 2), and PhyloSuite v1.2.3 [22,23] software was used to construct a phylogenetic tree using the maximum likelihood (ML) method based on the combined ITS and β-tub sequence alignment. Botryosphaeria dothidea (CMW 8000) was set as an outgroup. Both of the nucleotide substitution models of the two loci were inferred as HKY+F, and the number of bootstraps [24,25] was set as 5000.

2.4. Genome Assembly and Annotation

To determine whether the extracted genomic DNA of isolate HNDZ1920 met the requirements for whole-genome sequencing, concentration, purity, and integrity tests were conducted using an Agilent 5400 (Advanced Analytical Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Next, the genomic library was prepared using the NEBNext®Ultra™ DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, San Diego, CA, USA). Genome sequencing was performed with the Illumina NovaSeq PE150 platform by Novogene Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). Afterward, the draft genome of HNDZ192 was assembled and annotated. Specifically, we used FastQC (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/, accessed on 31 October 2021), FastUniq [26], Musket [27], and Fastp [28] for quality control. Next, we used GCE [29] and JellyFish [30] for the genome survey. Furthermore, we used kmergenie (http://kmergenie.bx.psu.edu/, accessed on 31 October 2021), SPAdes [31], ABySS [32], SOAPdenovo2 [33], quickmerge [34], and gapcloser [33] for genome assembly. Lastly, we used QUAST [35] and BUSCO [36] to evaluate the genome assembly.
The genome components were annotated via CEGMA [37], Augustus [38], RepeatMasker [39], RepeatModeler [40], tRNAscan [41], barrnap (https://github.com/seemann/barrnap, accessed on 14 September 2022), and CMscan 1.1.4 [42] software and the Rfam [43] database. Additionally, the genome functions were annotated via commonly used constructed databases locally with Blastp [44], including Nr [45], Kog [46,47], KEGG [48,49], GO [50], SwissProt [51], Pfam [52], TCDB [53], P450 [54], and Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes (CAZymes) [55]. To explore the gene clusters involved in the formation of secondary metabolites (SMs) within the genome, antiSMASH [56] was used. Moreover, we used the PHI [57] and DFVF [58] databases to annotate the pathogen–host interactions and fungal virulence factors.
The traditional development strategy of microsatellite markers requires the synthesis of a large number of primers and amplifications of each sample in the screening population, resulting in the wasted synthesis of a large number of monomorphic primers [59]. In order to improve the screening efficiency of polymorphism microsatellite loci, we integrated our technique with resequencing technology to screen the polymorphic variations of microsatellite loci among different isolates of N. dimidiatum. The whole-genome resequencing of the other five isolates was performed using the Illumina NovaSeq PE150 platform by Novogene Co., Ltd., with a sequencing depth of 40×. The resequencing genome assemblies were processed the same as the draft genome of HNDZ1920.

2.5. Microsatellite Marker Development and Primer Design

The microsatellite markers used in the present study were developed according to the following two strategies. At the start of the study, we utilized MISA v2.1 [60] software to search and identify SSR loci on the assembled HNDZ1920 draft genome sequence only, and the parameters for “unit_size” were set as follows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6; the corresponding parameter “min_repeats” was set as 10, 6, 5, 5, 5, and 5, respectively. The compound SSR loci were defined if the maximum number of bases between two distinct SSRs was 100. We ruled out the single-base and compound SSR loci and ran MISA to screen the remaining SSR loci for primer design. In order to identify extra SSR loci, we further aligned these remaining SSRs and their flanking sequences with the resequencing assemblies of another five isolates. All SSR loci with genetic variations in a particular locus among different assemblies were extracted. These candidate SSR loci were used to design the additional primers using Primer3 v2.3.6 [61]. The program parameters were set as follows: the range of the fragment lengths of amplicons was from 100 to 350 bp; the positions of the amplicon fragments were from the first base to the last five bases of the repeat sequence; and the remaining parameters were defaulted.
To examine the polymorphic primers, a total of thirteen N. dimidiatum isolates with diverse genetic backgrounds were amplified using the PCR method. The designed primers were synthesized using the splicing method and a 21 bp adapter sequence was added to the upstream primer during synthesis. The reaction was performed using a Veriti 384 PCR instrument and the PCR amplification program was set as follows: initial denaturation (95 °C, 5 min); denaturation (95 °C, 30 s), gradient annealing (62–52 °C, 30 s, and decreasing 1 °C per cycle), and extension (72 °C, 30 s), 10 cycles; denaturation (95 °C, 30 s), annealing (52 °C, 30 s), and extension (72 °C, 30 s), 25 cycles; extension (72 °C, 20 min); and storage (4 °C). The total 10 μL PCR mixture was composed of 5 μL of 2×Taq PCR Master Mix, 1 μL of template, 0.5 μL of forward primer (10 pmol/μL), 0.5 μL of reverse primer (10 pmol/μL), and 4 μL of distilled water. Following PCR amplification, we detected the products using an ABI 3730xl fluorescence-based DNA analyzer; the results were analyzed using GeneMarker v3.0.0 [62] software, allowing us to determine the number of alleles, peak charts, and genotype data.
We added four different fluorophores, including 6-FAM [5′-fluorescein ce-phosphoramidite], 6-HEX [5′-hexachlorofluorescein phosphoramidite], 6-ROX [6-carboxy-x-rhodamine], and 6-TAMR-SE [6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine N-succinimidyl ester], to the 5′ end of the polymorphism PCR primers. To validate the power of these fluorescent microsatellite markers, 35 isolates collected from different locations in China were genotyped using the resulting eight pairs of polymorphic microsatellite primers and detected via ABI 3730xl fluorescence-based capillary electrophoresis. Lastly, we used the genotyping data to construct a neighbor-joining tree through the use of the aboot() method in the R package poppr [63]. The number of bootstrap replicates was 1000.

3. Results

3.1. Isolate Identification

To identify all the isolates used in the present study, a phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the alignments of ITS and β-tub loci. The result showed that all isolates were clustered with N. dimidiatum isolated from the stem cankers of pitayas, indicating that all isolates used in the present study were N. dimidiatum (Figure 1).

3.2. Genome Assembly and Annotation

The resulting genome assembly harbored a total genome size of 41.46 MB with an overall GC content of 53.96%. The genome sequence was assembled with a contig N50 length of 266.9 KB. The quality of the genome assembly was evaluated using the Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) tool with the “fungi_odb10” library as the reference dataset. The results contained 729 groups, accounting for 96.2% of a total of 758 complement ortholog groups in BUSCO. Approximately 6.45% of the repeat sequences were identified via RepeatModeler and RepeatMasker. The content of tRNA, rRNA, sRNA, and snRNA was identified as 138, 15, 3, and 38, respectively. The number of protein-coding genes annotated using CEGMA and AUGUSTUS was 9863 (Table 3). The lengths of the genes were widely distributed (Figure 2).
A total of 9054 genes were annotated using the NR Fungi sub-database; 6561 genes were annotated with the GO database; 2870 genes were annotated with the KOG database; and 3749 genes were annotated with the SwissProt database. In addition, 8893 and 7096 genes were assigned to KEGG and Pfam terms, respectively. A total of 951 genes were defined as encoded secreted proteins using SignalP and TMHMM, respectively. A total of 551 genes were identified using dbCAN2, including 116 auxiliary activities (AAs), 248 glycoside hydrolases (GHs), 85 carbohydrate esterases (CEs), 70 glycosyl transferases (GTs), and 28 polysaccharide lyases (PLs). In addition, 823 and 492 genes were annotated according to the TCDB database and Cytochrome P450 database, respectively. Ultimately, fifteen type I polyketides (T1PKS), six non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS), eleven non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS), and eight terpene gene clusters were identified. Lastly, a total of 1594 PHI entries and 607 DFVF entries were annotated (Figure 3 and Figure A1, Figure A2, Figure A3, Figure A4, Figure A5, Figure A6, Figure A7 and Figure A8). Similarly, after whole-genome resequencing assembly, we obtained five genome sequences with lengths of 42.64 MB, 42.84 MB, 43.03 MB, 42.95 MB, and 43.11 MB.

3.3. Polymorphic Microsatellite Markers

A total of 12,515 microsatellite loci were identified in the reference genome sequence, and the main types of repeat motifs were mononucleotide (A/T and C/G) and trinucleotide (CCG/CGG) (Figure 4).
Based on the reference genome sequence only, 2865 pairs of microsatellite primers were screened, and 192 pairs of primers were randomly selected and synthesized by Guangzhou Tianyihuiyuan Gene Technology Co., Ltd. The resulting primer pairs were tested via the screening panel, including thirteen N. dimidiatum isolates, and two pairs of polymorphic primers were screened successfully.
Combined with the alignments of the five resequencing assemblies to the draft genome, we successfully designed 3233 pairs of primers on the loci, thus ruling out single-base and composite SSR loci. We preliminarily selected 336 pairs of primers randomly and screened them using the thirteen isolates. A total of six pairs of primers that can amplify more than two alleles were screened, according to the peak output condition and quality. Taken together, a total of eight pairs of polymorphic primers were developed successfully.
In order to accurately calculate the values of fluorescence signal peaks, four different fluorescent markers were added to the 5’ end of the primers (Table 4; Figure 5). The results showed that each microsatellite marker site has two or more alleles.

3.4. Validation of the Fluorescent Microsatellite Genotyping Assay

The power of the eight polymorphic microsatellite markers was evaluated with a panel of 35 N. dimidiatum isolates. The number of alleles (Na) ranged from two to four, and the polymorphism information content (PIC) values varied from 0.054 to 0.338, with a mean of 0.140 (Table 5).
The neighbor-joining tree constructed with microsatellite genotypes indicated that there is a certain degree of genetic variation among the different isolates. The isolates collected from different cities or counties in the Hainan Province are scattered and distributed in different branches. Among them, two isolates collected from Sanya, Hainan (HNSY2115 and HNSY2116), are clustered into one branch; one isolate from Haikou, Hainan (HNHK2002), is branched separately; one isolate from Ledong, Hainan (HNLD2026), is branched separately; one isolate from Lingshui, Hainan (HNLS2119), is branched separately; and one isolate from Chengmai, Hainan (HNCM1901), is branched separately. The isolates collected from Chongzuo, Guangxi (GXCZ2043 and GXCZ2044); Yangjiang, Guangdong (GDYJ2039 and GDYJ2040); and Xishuangbanna, Yunnan (YNBN2042), were clustered with isolates from the Hainan Province (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

Pitayas are widely planted in tropical and subtropical regions around the world. The Hainan Province is an important pitaya production area in China. Cankers caused by N. dimidiatum represent a limiting factor for the development of the pitaya industry. The phylogenetic results of the present study show that our fungal isolates were grouped together with N. hylocereum, which has been proposed as a novel designated Neoscytalidium species that causes cankers on red-fleshed dragon fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) in Southern Thailand (Figure 1) [64]. However, the taxonomic relationships within Neoscytalidium species have been comprehensively reviewed recently. Following a comprehensive assessment, evidence strongly supports the synonymy between N. hylocereum and N. oculus with N. dimidiatum [7]. Hence, we still consider our fungal isolates as N. dimidiatum in the present study.
Genome-based molecular markers are important resources for the assessment of genetic diversity in pathogenic populations [65,66]. Therefore, it is of great significance to characterize the population dynamics of N. dimidiatum by means of genetic markers, so as to support the pitaya production chain. In the present study, the sequencing depth of the draft genome HNDZ1920 was 100×, and 11 GB of raw data was obtained. This assembled and annotated draft genome is able to meet the demand for microsatellite primer development. Additionally, the sequencing depth of whole-genome resequencing was 40×, and 5–6 GB of raw data for each sample was obtained, and their assembly processes were identical to the reference genome sequence HNDZ1920. The assembly qualities also met the demand for alignment with the draft genome. The base compositions of microsatellite loci on the draft genome are diverse, and the upstream and downstream sequences of most microsatellite loci are specific, thus implying that these candidate microsatellite loci have the potential to become widely used as genetic markers in population genetics and evolutionary studies. At the beginning of our study, we used the draft genome sequence only to screen the polymorphism microsatellite loci; however, only two loci with polymorphism between different isolates were screened, and the successful screening rate was approximately 1.02%, suggesting that this strategy has low screening efficiency. Our results are similar to those of previous reports in that the rate of discovering polymorphic microsatellite markers is still not high even if the development and screening of microsatellite markers are time-consuming and inefficient [67]. The authors of previous studies [68] have reported that combined resequencing strategies make it possible to improve the screening efficiency of microsatellite molecular markers. Hence, we further resequenced the genomes of another five N. dimidiatum isolates. Subsequently, we selectively designed 336 pairs of primers based on the resequencing comparison results to screen for microsatellite loci with polymorphisms and ultimately identified six polymorphic microsatellite loci. The successful screening rate was approximately 1.79%. Thus, screening efficiency increased by 75.49% compared to solely relying on the random screening of a single genome sequence.
We used a collection of 35 isolates with a wide sampling range to examine the power of microsatellite primers. As a measure of discriminatory power, the average PIC value of the developed markers in this study was 0.14 (<0.25), suggesting a low degree of discriminatory power according to the categorized criterion of the PIC values [69]. Both the low screening rate of microsatellites (1.79%) and the PIC range (0.054~0.338) of the eight pairs of polymorphic primers are most likely due to the limited degree of genetic variation among the isolates collected from different locations.

5. Conclusions

In the present study, we investigated the sequence differences in microsatellite loci, developed specific primers of the microsatellite polymorphism sites, and filled the gap in the presently available research tools for the characterization of the population structure and dynamics of N. dimidiatum. The eight pairs of microsatellite primers developed in the present study exhibited specificity and universality for the genotyping of N. dimidiatum, which have the potential to be widely used to genotype the pathogen worldwide. Their utilization will actively promote collaboration between laboratories around the world to conduct population research on N. dimidiatum, which is of great significance for the population variation and epidemic monitoring of this pathogen. Ultimately, however, there are still a large number of microsatellite loci in the genome sequence of N. dimidiatum, which is likely to have potential genetic variations among a screening panel of isolates with a wider genetic background than the panel used in the present study. Thus, it is still meaningful to continue to screen polymorphic microsatellite loci for the genotyping of the N. dimidiatum population, and in the future, more polymorphic microsatellite loci may be detected that were not discovered in our study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.W.; Data Curation, R.L. and X.L.; Formal Analysis, R.L.; Funding Acquisition, J.W.; Investigation, R.L., X.L., J.T. and C.X.; Resources, C.X.; Supervision, J.W.; Visualization, R.L.; Writing—Original Draft, R.L., C.X. and J.W.; Writing—Review and Editing, R.L. and J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 321MS011).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence and resequencing assembly results of N. dimidiatum isolates are available in NCBI under BioProject: PRJNA981440, BioSample: SAMN35719075, SAMN41487665, SAMN41487666, SAMN41487667, SAMN41487668, and SAMN41487669.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Chao Zhang for sampling and isolating the N. dimidiatum in the fields and laboratory and the anonymous peer reviewers for their constructive comments that led to improving the quality of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Genes 15 00885 g0a1
Figure A1. Gene Ontology (GO) annotation of the N. dimidiatum draft genome.
Figure A1. Gene Ontology (GO) annotation of the N. dimidiatum draft genome.
Genes 15 00885 g0a1
Genes 15 00885 g0a2
Figure A2. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway annotation of the N. dimidiatum draft genome.
Figure A2. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway annotation of the N. dimidiatum draft genome.
Genes 15 00885 g0a2
Genes 15 00885 g0a3
Figure A3. RefSeq non-redundant protein annotation result of the N. dimidiatum draft genome.
Figure A3. RefSeq non-redundant protein annotation result of the N. dimidiatum draft genome.
Genes 15 00885 g0a3
Genes 15 00885 g0a4
Figure A4. Clusters of orthologous groups for the eukaryotic complete genome annotation of the N. dimidiatum draft genome.
Figure A4. Clusters of orthologous groups for the eukaryotic complete genome annotation of the N. dimidiatum draft genome.
Genes 15 00885 g0a4
Genes 15 00885 g0a5
Figure A5. The Transporter Classification Database annotation of the N. dimidiatum draft genome.
Figure A5. The Transporter Classification Database annotation of the N. dimidiatum draft genome.
Genes 15 00885 g0a5
Genes 15 00885 g0a6
Figure A6. Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes Database annotation of the N. dimidiatum draft genome.
Figure A6. Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes Database annotation of the N. dimidiatum draft genome.
Genes 15 00885 g0a6
Genes 15 00885 g0a7
Figure A7. Pathogen–host interactions base annotation of the N. dimidiatum draft genome.
Figure A7. Pathogen–host interactions base annotation of the N. dimidiatum draft genome.
Genes 15 00885 g0a7
Genes 15 00885 g0a8
Figure A8. Secondary metabolic cluster analysis of the N. dimidiatum draft genome.
Figure A8. Secondary metabolic cluster analysis of the N. dimidiatum draft genome.
Genes 15 00885 g0a8
Genes 15 00885 g0a9
Figure A9. Fingerprint of 35 N. dimidiatum isolates. N, the total number of the samples; loci, the total number of the microsatellite markers.
Figure A9. Fingerprint of 35 N. dimidiatum isolates. N, the total number of the samples; loci, the total number of the microsatellite markers.
Genes 15 00885 g0a9

References

  1. Morton, J.F. (Ed.) Fruits of Warm Climates; Echo Point Books and Media: Brattleboro, VT, USA, 1987; p. 1514. [Google Scholar]
  2. Le Bellec, F.; Vaillant, F.; Imbert, E. Pitahaya (Hylocereus spp.): A new fruit crop, a market with a future. Fruits 2006, 61, 37–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Adnan, L.; Osman, A.; Abdul, H.A. Antioxidant activity of different extracts of red pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) seed. Int. J. Food Prop. 2011, 14, 1171–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China. The Tenfold Increase in the Planting Area of Dragon Fruit in China Has Raised Concerns in Vietnam. Available online: http://hochiminh.mofcom.gov.cn/article/jmxw/202012/20201203024850.shtml (accessed on 21 December 2020).
  5. Produce Report. China’s Dragon Fruit Production Ranks First in the World, with the Fastest Growth Rates in Guangdong, Guangxi, and Hainan Provinces. Available online: https://guojiguoshu.com/article/8128 (accessed on 22 February 2023).
  6. Yi, R.; Gan, L.; Yan, D.; Wu, Z.; Tong, Y.; Wu, F. Identification and biological characteristics of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum causing pitaya canker. Acta Phytophylacica Sin. 2013, 40, 102–108. [Google Scholar]
  7. Derviş, S.; Özer, G. Plant-associated Neoscytalidium dimidiatum-taxonomy, host range, epidemiology, virulence, and management strategies: A comprehensive review. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sanahuja, G.; Lopez, P.; Palmateer, A.J. First report of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum causing stem and fruit canker of Hylocereus undatus in Florida. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dai, J.; Wang, H.; Fu, B.; Wang, M.; Tao, T.; Xie, C.; Zhu, C. Determination of biological characteristics of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum and Fusicoccum sp. on pitaya. South China Fruits 2017, 46, 78–82. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, R.; Liu, A.; Bai, C.; Liu, C.; Luo, X.; Jiang, F.; Liang, R.; Zheng, H. Symptom observation and pathogen identification on canker disease of pitaya. J. Fruit Sci. 2013, 30, 854–856. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhu, W.; Zhan, J. Population genetics of plant pathogens. Hereditas 2012, 34, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Desai, A.; Marwah, V.S.; Yadav, A.; Jha, V.; Dhaygude, K.; Bangar, U.; Kulkarni, V.; Jere, A. Identification of optimum sequencing depth especially for de novo genome assembly of small genomes using next generation sequencing data. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e60204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Litt, M.; Luty, J.A. A hypervariable microsatellite revealed by in vitro amplification of a dinucleotide repeat within the cardiac muscle actin gene. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1989, 44, 397–401. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fan, C.; Liu, Q.; Zeng, B.; Qiu, Z.; Zhou, C.; Chen, K.; Guo, G. Development of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers and genetic diversity analysis in blackwood clones in China. Silvae Genet. 2016, 65, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tsykun, T.; Rellstab, C.; Dutech, C.; Sipos, G.; Prospero, S. Comparative assessment of SSR and SNP markers for inferring the population genetic structure of the common fungus Armillaria cepistipes. Heredity 2017, 119, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Guichoux, E.; Lagache, L.; Wagner, S.; Chaumeil, P.; Léger, P.; Lepais, O.; Lepoittevin, C.; Malausa, T.; Revardel, E.; Salin, F.; et al. Current trends in microsatellite genotyping. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11, 591–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Powell, W.; Machray, G.C.; Provan, J. Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends Plant Sci. 1996, 1, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Salehi, M.; Arzani, A.; Talebi, M.; Rokhzadi, A. Genetic diversity of wheat wild relatives using SSR markers. Genetika 2018, 50, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Prasanna, H.C.; Sinha, D.P.; Verma, A.; Singh, M.; Singh, B.; Rai, M.; Martin, D.P. The population genomics of begomoviruses: Global scale population structure and gene flow. Virol. J. 2010, 7, 220–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S. Analysis of phylogenetic relationships by amplification and direct sequencing of ribosomal RNA genes. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  21. Glass, N.L.; Donaldson, G.C. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, D.; Gao, F.; Jakovlić, I.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.X.; Wang, G.T. PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020, 20, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xiang, C.; Gao, F.; Jakovlić, I.; Lei, H.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zou, H.; Wang, G.; Zhang, D. Using PhyloSuite for molecular phylogeny and tree-based analyses. iMeta 2023, 2, e87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Minh, B.Q.; Nguyen, M.A.; von Haeseler, A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 1188–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, H.; Luo, X.; Qian, J.; Pang, X.; Song, J.; Qian, G.; Chen, J.; Chen, S. FastUniq: A fast de novo duplicates removal tool for paired short reads. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e52249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Y.; Schröder, J.; Schmidt, B. Musket: A multistage k-mer spectrum-based error corrector for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, J. Fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, i884–i890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, B.; Shi, Y.; Yuan, J.; Hu, X.; Zhang, H.; Li, N.; Fan, W. Estimation of genomic characteristics by analyzing k-mer frequency in de novo genome projects. arXiv 2013, arXiv:1308.2012. [Google Scholar]
  30. Marçais, G.; Kingsford, C. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 764–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Simpson, J.T.; Wong, K.; Jackman, S.D.; Schein, J.E.; Jones, S.J.; Birol, I. ABySS: A parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1117–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Luo, R.; Liu, B.; Xie, Y.; Li, Z.; Huang, W.; Yuan, J.; He, G.; Chen, Y.; Pan, Q.; Liu, Y.; et al. SOAPdenovo2: An empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 2012, 1, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thomas, C.M. Improved Genome Assembly and annotation of the soybean aphid (Aphis glycines Matsumura). G3-Genes Genomes Genet. 2020, 10, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gurevich, A.; Saveliev, V.; Vyahhi, N.; Tesler, G. QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 1072–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Simão, F.A.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Ioannidis, P.; Kriventseva, E.V.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3210–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Parra, G.; Bradnam, K.; Korf, I. CEGMA: A pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 1061–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Stanke, M.; Diekhans, M.; Baertsch, R.; Haussler, D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Saha, S.; Bridges, S.; Magbanua, Z.V.; Peterson, D.G. Empirical comparison of ab initio repeat finding programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, 2284–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Flynn, J.M.; Hubley, R.; Goubert, C.; Rosen, J.; Clark, A.G.; Feschotte, C.; Smit, A.F. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 9451–9457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Lowe, T.M.; Eddy, S.R. tRNAscan-SE: A program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cui, X.; Lu, Z.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.J.-Y.; Gao, X. CMsearch: Simultaneous exploration of protein sequence space and structure space improves not only protein homology detection but also protein structure prediction. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, i332–i340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Burge, S.W.; Daub, J.; Eberhardt, R.; Tate, J.; Barquist, L.; Nawrocki, E.P.; Eddy, S.R.; Gardner, P.P.; Bateman, A. Rfam 11.0: 10 years of RNA families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D226–D232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Camacho, C.; Coulouris, G.; Avagyan, V.; Ma, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Bealer, K.; Madden, T.L. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, W.; Jaroszewski, L.; Godzik, A. Tolerating some redundancy significantly speeds up clustering of large protein databases. Bioinformatics 2002, 18, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tatusov, R.L.; Fedorova, N.D.; Jackson, J.D.; Jacobs, A.R.; Kiryutin, B.; Koonin, E.V.; Krylov, D.M.; Mazumder, R.; Mekhedov, S.L.; Nikolskaya, A.N.; et al. The COG database: An updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics 2003, 4, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Galperin, M.Y.; Makarova, K.S.; Wolf, Y.I.; Koonin, E.V. Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D261–D269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S.; Kawashima, S.; Okuno, Y.; Hattori, M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, D277–D280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S.; Hattori, M.; Aoki-Kinoshita, K.F.; Itoh, M.; Kawashima, S.; Katayama, T.; Araki, M.; Hirakawa, M. From genomics to chemical genomics: New developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D354–D357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ashburner, M.; Ball, C.A.; Blake, J.A.; Botstein, D.; Butler, H.; Cherry, J.M.; Davis, A.P.; Dolinski, K.; Dwight, S.S.; Eppig, J.T.; et al. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bairoch, A.; Apweiler, R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sonnhammer, E.L.; Eddy, S.R.; Durbin, R. Pfam: A comprehensive database of protein domain families based on seed alignments. Proteins 1997, 28, 405–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Saier, M.H.; Reddy, V.S.; Moreno-Hagelsieb, G.; Hendargo, K.J.; Zhang, Y.; Iddamsetty, V.; Lam, K.J.K.; Tian, N.; Russum, S.; Wang, J.; et al. The transporter classification database (TCDB): 2021 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D461–D467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lisitsa, A.V.; Gusev, S.A.; Karuzina, I.I.; Archakov, A.I.; Koymans, L. Cytochrome P450 database. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2001, 12, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cantarel, B.L.; Coutinho, P.M.; Rancurel, C.; Bernard, T.; Lombard, V.; Henrissat, B. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): An expert resource for glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D233–D238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Medema, M.H.; Blin, K.; Cimermancic, P.; De Jager, V.; Zakrzewski, P.; Fischbach, M.A.; Weber, T.; Takano, E.; Breitling, R. antiSMASH: Rapid identification, annotation and analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters in bacterial and fungal genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W339–W346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Urban, M.; Pant, R.; Raghunath, A.; Irvine, A.G.; Pedro, H.; Hammond-Kosack, K.E. The pathogen-host interactions database (PHI-base): Additions and future developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D645–D655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lu, T.; Yao, B.; Zhang, C. DFVF: Database of fungal virulence factors. Database 2012, 2012, bas032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jiang, S.; Luo, J.; Wang, X.; Shi, C. A study on efficient screening of the primers for selecting polymorphic SSR markers based on the re-sequencing data in Pyrus. J. Fruit Sci. 2019, 36, 129–136. [Google Scholar]
  60. Beier, S.; Thiel, T.; Münch, T.; Scholz, U.; Mascher, M. MISA-web: A web server for microsatellite prediction. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 2583–2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Untergasser, A.; Cutcutache, I.; Koressaar, T.; Ye, J.; Faircloth, B.C.; Remm, M.; Rozen, S.G. Primer3—New capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Paisley, B.M.; Liu, Y. GeneMarkeR: A database and user interface for scRNA-seq marker genes. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 763431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kamvar, Z.N.; Tabima, J.F.; Grünwald, N.J. Poppr: An R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. Peer-J 2014, 2, e281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wonglom, P.; Pornsuriya, C.; Sunpapao, A. A new species of Neoscytalidium hylocereum sp. nov. causing canker on red-fleshed dragon fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) in Southern Thailand. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zheng, Y.; Zhang, G.; Lin, F.; Wang, Z.; Jin, G.; Yang, L.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Xu, Z.; Zhao, X.; et al. Development of microsatellite markers and construction of genetic map in rice blast pathogen Magnaporthe grisea. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2008, 45, 1340–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Varshney, R.K.; Graner, A.; Sorrells, M.E. Genic microsatellite markers in plants: Features and applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Wang, H.; Gao, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, D. A pipeline for effectively developing highly polymorphic simple sequence repeats markers based on multi-sample genomic data. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 12, e8705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Luo, H.; Wang, X.; Zhan, G.; Wei, G.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, J.; Huang, L.; Kang, Z. Genome-Wide analysis of simple sequence sepeats and efficient development of polymorphic SSR markers based on whole genome re-sequencing of multiple isolates of the wheat stripe rust fungus. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0130362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Botstein, D.; White, R.L.; Skolnick, M.; Davis, R.W. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1980, 32, 314–331. [Google Scholar]
Genes 15 00885 g001
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Neoscytalidium based on the combined ITS and β-tub sequence alignment. The tree was rooted to B. dothidea. Note that the figure only shows the six N. dimidiatum isolates used during genome sequencing and resequencing.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Neoscytalidium based on the combined ITS and β-tub sequence alignment. The tree was rooted to B. dothidea. Note that the figure only shows the six N. dimidiatum isolates used during genome sequencing and resequencing.
Genes 15 00885 g001
Genes 15 00885 g002
Figure 2. Gene length distribution.
Figure 2. Gene length distribution.
Genes 15 00885 g002
Genes 15 00885 g003
Figure 3. The number of genes annotated using coding genes in the different databases.
Figure 3. The number of genes annotated using coding genes in the different databases.
Genes 15 00885 g003
Genes 15 00885 g004
Figure 4. The number of genomic microsatellite loci in the N. dimidiatum genome.
Figure 4. The number of genomic microsatellite loci in the N. dimidiatum genome.
Genes 15 00885 g004
Genes 15 00885 g005
Figure 5. Peak plots of eight polymorphic microsatellite loci.
Figure 5. Peak plots of eight polymorphic microsatellite loci.
Genes 15 00885 g005
Genes 15 00885 g006
Figure 6. Neighbor-joining tree constructed based on the fluorescent microsatellite genotypes. Green, red and sky blue highlights represent the isolates collected from Guangxi autonomous region, Yunnan and Guangdong provinces of China, respectively. Medium purple, blush red, dark blue, orchid purple and lavender purple highlights represent the isolates collected from Hainan Province of China and independently branched. Details of the isolates used in this tree are shown in Table 1.
Figure 6. Neighbor-joining tree constructed based on the fluorescent microsatellite genotypes. Green, red and sky blue highlights represent the isolates collected from Guangxi autonomous region, Yunnan and Guangdong provinces of China, respectively. Medium purple, blush red, dark blue, orchid purple and lavender purple highlights represent the isolates collected from Hainan Province of China and independently branched. Details of the isolates used in this tree are shown in Table 1.
Genes 15 00885 g006
Table 1. Basic information on the N. dimidiatum used in the present study.
Table 1. Basic information on the N. dimidiatum used in the present study.
IsolatesYearsLocationsReference
Genome		ResequencingPrimer
Screening
HNCM19012019Chengmai, Hainan--Yes
HNDZ19052019Danzhou, Hainan---
HNQH19102019Qionghai, Hainan--Yes
HNDZ19142019Danzhou, Hainan--Yes
HNDZ19202019Danzhou, HainanYes--
HNDZ19212019Danzhou, Hainan---
HNHK20022020Haikou, Hainan--Yes
HNBS20082020Baisha, Hainan--Yes
HNDF20092020Dongfang, Hainan---
HNDZ20172020Danzhou, Hainan---
HNDZ20182020Danzhou, Hainan---
HNDZ20192020Danzhou, Hainan---
HNCJ20202020Changjiang, Hainan--Yes
HNCJ20212020Changjiang, Hainan---
HNDF20222020Dongfang, Hainan--Yes
HNDF20232020Dongfang, Hainan---
HNDF20242020Dongfang, Hainan---
HNLD20262020Ledong, Hainan---
HNLD20322020Ledong, Hainan---
HNLD20332020Ledong, Hainan---
HNLD20342020Ledong, Hainan-Yes-
HNLD20352020Ledong, Hainan-Yes-
HNLD20362020Ledong, Hainan-Yes-
GDYJ20392020Yangjiang, Hainan-YesYes
GDYJ20402020Yangjiang, Hainan---
YNBN20422020Xishuangbanna, Yunnan--Yes
GXCZ20432020Chongzuo, Guangxi--Yes
GXCZ20442020Chongzuo, Guangxi---
HNWC20462020Wenchang, Hainan--Yes
HNSY21152021Sanya, Hainan---
HNSY21162021Sanya, Hainan-YesYes
HNLS21192021Lingshui, Hainan---
HNLS21212021Lingshui, Hainan---
HNLS21242021Lingshui, Hainan--Yes
HNLS21292021Lingshui, Hainan---
Note that all the isolates listed in this table were isolated from the pitayas and used for genotyping.
Table 2. Collection details and GenBank accession numbers of isolates used in the present study for phylogenetic analysis.
Table 2. Collection details and GenBank accession numbers of isolates used in the present study for phylogenetic analysis.
SpeciesVoucher/CultureLocationGenBank Accession Number
ITStub
N. dimidiatumArp2-DTurkeyMK813852MK813852
N. dimidiatumKale4-CTurkeyMK788362MK788362
N. dimidiatumNd_Fig01TurkeyOL304243OK788660
N. dimidiatumNd_Fig02TurkeyOL304244OK788661
N. dimidiatumNd_Fig03TurkeyOL304245OK788662
N. dimidiatumOl_Dr04TurkeyOK416080OK428827
N. dimidiatumOl_Hl02TurkeyOK416072OK428819
N. dimidiatumOl_Nz19TurkeyOK416079OK428826
N. dimidiatumNd_Pp01TurkeyOK643641OK666382
N. hyalinumCBS 125608GabonMH863571MT592752
N. hyalinumCBS 125609GabonMH863572MT592753
N. hyalinumCBS 125610GabonMH863573MT592754
N. hyalinumCBS 125617FranceMH863577MT592756
Neoscytalidium sp.CBS 125619FranceMT587533MT592757
Neoscytalidium sp.CBS 125622MartiniqueMT587537MT592765
N. hyalinumCBS 125623MartiniqueMH863579MT592766
N. dimidiatumCBS 125695FranceKX464231KX465065
N. hyalinumCBS 125808MartiniqueMH863768MT592767
Neoscytalidium sp.CBS 137.77USAMT587535MT592763
S. hyalinumCBS 145.78UKKF531816KF531796
N. dimidiatumCBS 251.49USAKF531819KF531799
Neoscytalidium sp.CBS 312.90NetherlandsMT587536MT592764
N. dimidiatumCBS 499.66MaliKF531820KF531800
Neoscytalidium sp.CBS 601.85USAMT587538MT592768
Neoscytalidium sp.CBS 662.77-MT587534MT592758
N. hyalinumCMM 3566BrazilKF234551KF254935
N. hyalinumCMM 3649BrazilKF234550KF254934
N. hyalinumCOUFAL 0144BrazilMH251953MH251969
N. hyalinumCOUFAL 0145BrazilMH251954MH251970
N. hyalinumCOUFAL 0146BrazilMH251955MH251971
N. dimidiatumDE 1606ChinaKY013660KY349087
N. hylocereumPSU-HP01ThailandLC590859LC647832
N. hylocereumTSU-HP01ThailandLC590860LC647833
N. hylocereumTSU-HP02ThailandLC590861LC647834
N. novaehollandiaeCBS 122070AustraliaEF585539MT592759
N. novaehollandiaeCBS 122071AustraliaEF585540MT592760
N. novaehollandiaeCBS 122072AustraliaEF585535MT592761
N. novaehollandiaeCBS 122610AustraliaEF585536MT592762
Neoscytalidium sp.IOM 325287MexicoMG764431-
N. orchidacearumMFLUCC 12-0533ThailandKU179865-
N. dimidiatumHNDZ1920ChinaPP917774PP928423
N. dimidiatumHNLD2034ChinaPP917775PP928424
N. dimidiatumHNLD2035ChinaPP917776PP928425
N. dimidiatumHNLD2036ChinaPP917777PP928426
N. dimidiatumGDYJ2039ChinaPP917778PP928427
N. dimidiatumHNSY2116ChinaPP917779PP928428
B. dothidea
(Outgroup)		CMW 8000SwitzerlandAY236949AY236927
Table 3. Genome assembly results of N. dimidiatum.
Table 3. Genome assembly results of N. dimidiatum.
Genome FeaturesN. dimidiatum Genome
Number of contigs578
Assembled genome size (bp)43,460,451
Contig N50 (bp)266,892
Contig L5045
Largest contig1,170,203
GC content of the genome (%)53.96
Ns per 100 kbp3.41
Content of repeat sequences (%)2,801,256 bp (6.45%)
tRNA138
rRNA15
sRNA3
snRNA38
Predicted protein-coding genes (#)9863
Table 4. Polymorphic SSR site-specific primers of N. dimidiatum.
Table 4. Polymorphic SSR site-specific primers of N. dimidiatum.
LocusPrimerProduct Length (bp)MotifFluorophore
Ndim027F:5′-GAGCAAAGGACACCAAAGCG-3′188–191AAGFAM
R:5′-GTCTCGATCTTGGTCGTCGG-3′
Ndim092F:5′-TCGCACAACACTTCGCAAAG-3′193–196AAGROX
R:5′-TGGATCGACGCCTTTGGAAA-3′
NdimS098F:5′-TTGGGTCCAGCTTGTGTTGT-3′269–271GAHEX
R:5′-GGTGCCTGCTCATTACGGTA-3′
NdimS117F:5′-CTCTTTGTCCGCTGGATGGT-3′313–315CTFAM
R:5′-ACAAGCCCCATACCCGTAAC-3′
NdimS121F:5′-CATCGAACGCATGCAAGAGG-3′168–171ACCHEX
R:5′-GGAGAAAGGCGTGCTCATGT-3′
NdimS124F:5′-ACACCTTTCTAGCGCAGTCC-3′204–206AGHEX
R:5′-TGAAGGTCTGGTCGATGTGC-3′
NdimS134F:5′-ATGTCGGCGCGTTATCTGAT-3′151–153GTFAM
R:5′-GGGTCCAGAATTCTCACCGG-3′
NdimS141F:5′-TCAAACGCTTCCCCTTCCTC-3′257–281CTTAMRA
R:5′-TGAGGAAGGAATCGATCGCG-3′
Locus, microsatellite molecular markers; primer, F: forward primer and R: reverse primer; product length (bp), PCR products’ length; motif, SSR repeat motif; fluorophore, primer modification: FAM, ROX, HEX, and TAMRA.
Table 5. Polymorphism information content of 8 SSRs in 35 N. dimidiatum isolates.
Table 5. Polymorphism information content of 8 SSRs in 35 N. dimidiatum isolates.
LocuskNPIC
Ndim0272350.054
Ndim0922350.182
NdimS0982350.102
NdimS1172350.054
NdimS1212350.338
NdimS1242350.182
NdimS1342350.054
NdimS1414350.158
Locus, microsatellite molecular markers; k, number of alleles; N, number of isolates; PIC, polymorphism information content.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, R.; Li, X.; Tang, J.; Xie, C.; Wang, J. The Development of a Fluorescent Microsatellite Marker Assay for the Pitaya Canker Pathogen (Neoscytalidium dimidiatum). Genes 2024, 15, 885. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070885

AMA Style

Li R, Li X, Tang J, Xie C, Wang J. The Development of a Fluorescent Microsatellite Marker Assay for the Pitaya Canker Pathogen (Neoscytalidium dimidiatum). Genes. 2024; 15(7):885. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070885

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Rui, Xi Li, Jingcheng Tang, Changping Xie, and Jianan Wang. 2024. "The Development of a Fluorescent Microsatellite Marker Assay for the Pitaya Canker Pathogen (Neoscytalidium dimidiatum)" Genes 15, no. 7: 885. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070885

APA Style

Li, R., Li, X., Tang, J., Xie, C., & Wang, J. (2024). The Development of a Fluorescent Microsatellite Marker Assay for the Pitaya Canker Pathogen (Neoscytalidium dimidiatum). Genes, 15(7), 885. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070885

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop