Next Article in Journal
Primary Cilia as a Possible Link between Left-Right Asymmetry and Neurodevelopmental Diseases
Next Article in Special Issue
Regulation of Replication Fork Advance and Stability by Nucleosome Assembly
Previous Article in Journal
Tissue Non-Specific Genes and Pathways Associated with Diabetes: An Expression Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Regulation of DNA Replication in Early Embryonic Cleavages
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Risks at the DNA Replication Fork: Effects upon Carcinogenesis and Tumor Heterogeneity

School of Molecular Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2017, 8(1), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8010046
Submission received: 6 December 2016 / Revised: 9 January 2017 / Accepted: 17 January 2017 / Published: 22 January 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue DNA Replication Controls)

Abstract

The ability of all organisms to copy their genetic information via DNA replication is a prerequisite for cell division and a biological imperative of life. In multicellular organisms, however, mutations arising from DNA replication errors in the germline and somatic cells are the basis of genetic diseases and cancer, respectively. Within human tumors, replication errors additionally contribute to mutator phenotypes and tumor heterogeneity, which are major confounding factors for cancer therapeutics. Successful DNA replication involves the coordination of many large-scale, complex cellular processes. In this review, we focus on the roles that defects in enzymes that normally act at the replication fork and dysregulation of enzymes that inappropriately damage single-stranded DNA at the fork play in causing mutations that contribute to carcinogenesis. We focus on tumor data and experimental evidence that error-prone variants of replicative polymerases promote carcinogenesis and on research indicating that the primary target mutated by APOBEC (apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide-like) cytidine deaminases is ssDNA present at the replication fork. Furthermore, we discuss evidence from model systems that indicate replication stress and other cancer-associated metabolic changes may modulate mutagenic enzymatic activities at the replication fork.
Keywords: replication; mutagenesis; cancer; APOBEC; mismatch repair; polymerase delta; polymerase epsilon; replication stress; nucleotide pools replication; mutagenesis; cancer; APOBEC; mismatch repair; polymerase delta; polymerase epsilon; replication stress; nucleotide pools

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mertz, T.M.; Harcy, V.; Roberts, S.A. Risks at the DNA Replication Fork: Effects upon Carcinogenesis and Tumor Heterogeneity. Genes 2017, 8, 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8010046

AMA Style

Mertz TM, Harcy V, Roberts SA. Risks at the DNA Replication Fork: Effects upon Carcinogenesis and Tumor Heterogeneity. Genes. 2017; 8(1):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8010046

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mertz, Tony M., Victoria Harcy, and Steven A. Roberts. 2017. "Risks at the DNA Replication Fork: Effects upon Carcinogenesis and Tumor Heterogeneity" Genes 8, no. 1: 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8010046

APA Style

Mertz, T. M., Harcy, V., & Roberts, S. A. (2017). Risks at the DNA Replication Fork: Effects upon Carcinogenesis and Tumor Heterogeneity. Genes, 8(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8010046

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop