1. Introduction
Human society with its economic activities depends heavily on the availability of water. One of the most important factors in Earth’s water cycle is precipitation. The lack of precipitation (drought conditions) is negatively affecting many human activities, as does a surplus (wet conditions). Persistent lower-than-average precipitation conditions have negative impacts on agriculture and forestry [
1,
2,
3,
4], damage natural ecosystems [
5,
6], and lead to decreased streamflow or groundwater levels [
7,
8,
9]. In the long run, they may even lead to soil degradation and desertification [
10,
11]. Heavy precipitation and long-lasting wetter-than-normal conditions may cause flashfloods [
12,
13] or river flooding [
14,
15,
16,
17,
18], reduce yields [
19,
20], and contribute to groundwater contamination [
21,
22,
23]. Thus, the study of the long-term variability and trends in precipitation at global, continental, and especially, regional scales is crucial for a targeted water resources management [
24]. Many researchers already studied the characteristics and changes of dry and/or wet periods based on different indices, data sources, and study periods [
24,
25,
26,
27,
28,
29,
30,
31,
32,
33,
34,
35]. Thereby, many studies focus just on one side of the precipitation probability density function, which is mainly drought. Studies that address changes in the spatial and temporal variability of dryness and wetness simultaneously are still quite rare.
The comparison of the climatic conditions of different areas, which often are characterized by specific hydrological balances, requires standardized variables that are able to objectively capture the drought and wetness condition of a region [
36]. These indices enable the analysis of various event characteristics like intensity, duration, frequency, and spatial extent [
37,
38,
39]. Manifold indices at different temporal scales are used in the scientific literature to study precipitation and its extremes; some are defined on a daily basis and others use data in monthly resolution. Indices at timescales between 1 and 24 months are generally used if drought is to be assessed. With these diverse timescales, different perspectives of drought and related impacts may be addressed. Generally, drought is classified into meteorological, agricultural, hydrological, and socio-economic drought [
40,
41]. Many of the indices that are normally used to assess drought conditions can be also applied to evaluate wetness. Widely used indices among a variety of existing drought indices are the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) [
42], the Standardized Precipitation Evaporation Index (SPEI) [
43], and the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) [
44]. While the SPI is based solely on precipitation, SPEI and PDSI also account for air temperature via potential evapotranspiration.
Different studies have explored the links between drought indices and observed drought impacts on different systems [
45,
46,
47,
48,
49]. They present a great variability in the index timescales showing the best correlation to drought impacts and a dependence of the correlation on the climate zone, the degree of human intervention, the geological and soil properties, and the present vegetation (e.g., tree or crop species). Generally, the correlations between the drought indices SPI and SPEI and the drought impacts are comparable, with slightly higher correlations for the SPEI [
46,
49,
50]. Rain-feed agriculture in Europe shows the best correlations of SPEI to drought impacts at timescales of 2–3 months, with the highest sensitivity to drought stress during late spring and early summer in Europe [
45]. Agriculture that is more dependent on irrigation and water storage shows the highest correlation to drought indices at the timescales of 9–12 months [
45]. Different timescales are relevant with respect to the water sector, with a strong dependence on the catchment characteristics [
45,
51,
52,
53]. Drought impacts on public water supply and freshwater ecosystems are explained by a combination of short (1–3 month) and seasonal (6–12 month) anomalies of SPEI and SPI, respectively [
45].
Observations show recent regional changes globally and within Europe in amount, intensity, frequency, and type of precipitation [
54,
55,
56]. Precipitation is known for its large natural variability and its trends are generally more variable—spatially and seasonally—than temperature changes [
54]. Pronounced long-term precipitation trends have been observed in some European areas during the 20th century; while northern Europe became significantly wetter, dryer conditions prevailed in the Mediterranean region [
57,
58]. Several studies suggest drying trends for the Mediterranean area [
58,
59,
60,
61] and climate model studies project a continuation of this tendency within the 21st century [
62,
63,
64,
65]. Widespread positive trends in heavy precipitation events are associated with the increased water holding capacity of the atmosphere, while increases in drought conditions are connected to the enhanced evaporation arising from global warming [
57]. Moreover, changes in precipitation extremes may be very different (even opposite) to those of precipitation means [
66,
67,
68].
Studies on causes and processes of precipitation extremes, as well as their past and future changes received increasing attention in recent years [
69,
70,
71]. Regional studies on precipitation extremes in Europe indicate complex and non-uniform spatial changes in precipitation patterns within the last century [
56,
70,
72,
73,
74]. Extreme precipitation trends as described by those and other studies depend, e.g., on individual study periods and regions. Therefore, a division of the European dataset into sub-regions appears reasonable [
75] to analyze variability and long-term changes in the characteristics of dry and wet period.
With regard to drought events, Spinoni et al. [
35] provide an overview on the biggest events in Europe for 1950–2012 by combing three drought indices (SPI, SPEI, and Reconnaissance Drought Index (RDI) [
76]) at the 3-month scale for meteorological and the 12-month scale for hydrological droughts. They also provide an extensive list of relevant references for the most important events. Their analysis identified pan-European drought events in 1950–1952, 1953–1954, 1972–1974, and 2003. Generally, the 1950s as well as the 1940s have been very dry [
77,
78,
79], with the drought events of the early 1950s covering half of Europe at the timescale of 12 months [
35]. Since the 1990s, rising average temperatures increasingly impact the observed severity of drought events, especially during the warm part of the year.
A recent study of Vicente-Serrano et al. [
80] analyzed the long-term variability and trends in meteorological droughts in Western Europe by applying the SPI at the timescale of 3 and 12 months. Precipitation data from 199 stations spanning the period 1851–2018 were employed. According to this analysis the temporal variability of drought in Western Europe is more dominant than long-term trends with no statistically significant long-term trends present in the study domain. The largest increases in drought condition based on the SPI-3 were found for summer in the British and Irish Isles. Vicente-Serrano et al. [
80] conclude that drought episodes experienced in the last two or three decades have precedents during the last 170 years and emphasize the importance of long records for assessing change. They describe the strong spatial diversity, with regions exhibiting a homogeneous temporal evolution as the main characteristic of drought variability in Western Europe.
Both the study of Spinoni et al. [
35] and the one of Vicente-Serrano et al. [
80] solely focus on drought, and thereby apply a selection of drought indices at the timescale of 3 and 12 months. In the present study, two indices at the timescale of 3 months are used to study the temporal and spatial variability of dry and wet conditions in Europe for up to 165 years. The focus is on event duration, frequency, and spatial extent within Europe and eight sub-regions. The choice of the indices is motivated by their straightforward computation (no distribution fitting) and the possibility of addressing long-term variations in precipitation and related dry and wet events (purely precipitation-based indices that are computed on a station base). The regional relevance of specific dry and wet periods and region-specific information on individual events is studied and particularly dry and wet years and seasons, respectively, are listed. The results and statistical properties of the two indices are compared to each other and to results obtained by other indices in the scientific literature.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area and Database
The analyses are based on monthly precipitation time series of up to 220 European meteorological stations (37°–70° N, 10° W–30° E;
Figure 1a) with preferably long records. The data were obtained from the European Climate Assessment and Dataset (ECA&D; [
81]), which includes more than 4000 rain gauge stations. For regional analyses and shorter study periods, much denser station networks may be applied, but we consciously restricted the analysis to a comparatively small collective fulfilling the following three criteria. First, long time series (preferably monthly precipitation data since 1851, but at least data since 1951) are used with an as high as possible data availability over the entire study period. Second, we aim at an even spatial distribution across Europe with approximately one station per 22,000 km
2, which led to the exclusion of some nearby stations and the inclusion of some stations with time series not covering the entire study period. The third criteria was a high quality of the times series. Therefore, we refer to a “valid” flag in the quality control and a classification as “useful” (for a start date of 1951) with respect to homogeneity (procedure of Wijngaard et al. [
82]). In order to fulfil the other two criteria, a few time series classified as doubtful for the longer periods (starting in 1851 or 1901) were included in the study.
The sub-regional climate characteristics in Europe mainly depend on latitude, distance from the sea, and local influences such as orography and land use. The stations were classified into eight sub-regions with similar precipitation characteristics (particularly the seasonal cycle and the annual precipitation totals). This allows determining regionally dependent tendencies in European dry and wet periods, as addressed in previous studies [
54,
70,
72,
73].
The stations show varying data availability within 1851–2015 (
Figure 1b). Data availability reaches 25% (55 of 220 stations) in 1862 and 50% (110 of 220 stations) in 1890, but the regional distribution over Europe is quite diverse. Since the year 2000, the data availability has decreased again. Some of the stations with long precipitation time series have been closed for different reasons; other stations are now managed by private institutions that follow a restrictive data policy. A considerable proportion of the stations have been relocated, for instance to airports or other locations outside the cities. With the increasing urbanization during the 20th and 21st centuries, many stations that once were situated in the periphery are now situated in the city center, which also affects the homogeneity of some time series.
Before 1890, station distribution was densest in the regions “British Isles” (BI), “Central Europe” (CE), and “Mediterranean Region” (MR), and thus, averaging the analysis results over entire Europe would result in a bias towards those regions. Although we show this information in some of the graphics, they are not included in the statistical analysis and interpretation. The reader can decide for himself, if he wants to carefully consider also the index variations during times with restricted data availability. The Europe-wide analysis starts in 1924, when the last region reaches a data availability of at least 50%. Sub-regional results are interpreted starting from the year the regional data availability reaches 50% of the maximum number of considered stations. These are 1851 for the “Mediterranean Region” (MR), 1871 for “Central Europe” (CE), 1881 for “South-Eastern Europe” (SE), 1891 for “Scandinavia” (SC), 1894 for the “Iberian Peninsula” (IP), 1921 for “Western Europe” (WE), and 1924 for “Eastern Europe” (EE). Just for region BI (British Isles), a higher threshold of 75% data availability is used due to the low number of stations within this region; here the analyses start in 1901.
2.2. Climate Indices
We study “long-term” deviations from “normal” precipitation conditions in contrast to the often-addressed “short-term” deviations of several days to weeks. For this purpose, two straightforward indices are used that have been mainly used for drought studies. The deciles [
38] were introduced by Gibbs and Maher [
83] as a rainfall anomaly concept and adapted by Kininmonth [
84] to study drought durations. The deciles concept can be also applied for the definition of long-lasting wet periods [
85]. The second index is the modified Rainfall Anomaly Index (mRAI) [
86], a modified version of the RAI [
87]. It was used to identify the driest years and seasons in the studied sub-regions. Furthermore, dry and wet periods were identified on the basis of the index values. This straightforward index delivers similar results to the widely used Standardized Precipitation Index SPI [
42,
88]. Both indices can be calculated by very simple means and require no specific programs.
2.2.1. Decile Indicator
The decile indicator is used to identify periods with exceptional precipitation totals over long timescales of several months and not only precipitation anomalies over a fixed timescale. Advantages of the decile indicator include its easy calculation as well as its low level of underlying assumptions, while it still provides an accurate statistical measure of long-term deviations of precipitation from normal conditions. The decile-based indicator for monitoring meteorological drought events was suggested by Gibbs and Maher [
81] and transcribed in analogue for wet events by Hänsel [
83].
The decile indicator is calculated by computing 3-month sums of the observed precipitation totals and dividing the frequency distribution obtained for the base period (1951–2000) into ten parts —the deciles. Thereby, the first decile is the precipitation amount that is not exceeded by the lowest 10% of all 3-month sums [
81,
83]. Those deciles are used to define the thresholds for start and end of decile dry and wet periods, respectively. Such an event (period) starts with moderately extreme precipitation conditions, when the 3-month sum is within the first (tenth) decile range for dry (wet) periods. It ends when precipitation leaves the normal range (defined as the interval between the fourth and seventh decile—30–70%) towards the opposite precipitation extreme. A second termination rule applies for decile dry periods in regions with strong seasonal differences in precipitation totals; decile dry periods also end if the precipitation of a single month is so large that it is in or above the fourth decile of the 3-month sum (>30%). The start/end of a decile period is defined to be the last month of the respective 3-month total, as dry and wet conditions, respectively, need some time to build up.
2.2.2. Modified Rainfall Anomaly Index, mRAI
The mRAI [
86] is used as a second purely precipitation-based drought index that can also be used to classify wet conditions. The mRAI standardizes the precipitation record for any desired timescale. Its computation is straightforward and does not include fitting a distribution to the precipitation data such as the computation of the widely used SPI [
42]. Instead, the average of the five most extreme values (10% driest and wettest events) within 1951–2000 and the median of the precipitation totals for the respective timescale are used for the standardization:
where
P = precipitation sum of the respective timescale;
= median precipitation of the base period 1951–2000 for the respective timescale;
= arithmetic average of the 10% most extreme precipitation sums (10th percentile for positive anomalies, 90th percentile for negative anomalies) of the base period 1951–2000; ±
SF = scaling factor (positive for
P >
, and negative for
P <
).
A scaling factor of
SF = 1.7 was empirically derived and suggested [
86] instead of the original scaling factor of
SF = 3 [
87]. Applying this scaling factor delivers similar values to the SPI, and the same classification of index values generally used for the SPI can be used (
Table 1). The application of the mRAI with a scaling factor of 1.7 in a study of the summer drought of 2015 in Europe showed very similar results to the simultaneous SPI analyses [
88]. For other climatic regions, the suitability of the scaling factor should be tested. Applying the mRAI concept to the climatic water balance instead of precipitation results in the Water Balance Anomaly Index WBAI [
86]. It was shown that the differences between WBAI and SPEI using the same approach for calculating the potential evapotranspiration are considerably smaller than between two SPEI versions calculated based on different methods for the estimation of potential evapotranspiration [
88].
2.2.3. Characteristics of Dry and Wet Periods
The studied characteristics of dry and wet periods as obtained by the two indices explained above are spatial extent, average and maximum duration as well as frequency. These characteristics are computed at the regional scale with a monthly and annual time step. Thereby, the annual time series are the basis for linear trend analyses. The graphics show the results in monthly resolution in order to illustrate also the intra-annual variability.
The spatial extent is estimated by the number of stations that show wet or dry conditions. The spatial extent is expressed as a percentage value (number of affected stations divided by the number of available station during each time step) to account for the variable number of available stations within the study period.
Applying the decile indicator directly delivers event durations (see
Section 2.2.1). Dry and wet period durations based on the mRAI values are identified at the 3-month timescale. Hence, the timing of the identified dry and wet periods shall be comparable to those identified by the deciles index. A dry period starts when the mRAI drops below −1 (moderately dry conditions; see
Table 1) and lasts until its values rise above zero (median conditions). Wet periods are defined analogously. They start if the mRAI is above +1 (moderately wet conditions) and last until the values drop below zero.
The average duration is computed for individual stations for the three studied 50-year periods (see the following
Section 2.3) and at an annual scale for the regions. The maximum duration at the regional scale is computed by averaging the observed station maxima for each of the studied 50-year periods. Regional trends are computed based on the longest duration of all stations within the addressed region that is determined for every 12-month period.
The event frequency is represented by the number of dry and wet periods, respectively, per 10 years.
2.3. Trend Analysis
Trend analyses were done for the annual and seasonal data. Therefore, the seasons spring (months March-April-May), summer (June-July-August), autumn (September-October-November), and winter (December-January-February) were addressed. Additionally, the developments during the half years (SHY = summer half year [AMJJAS]; WHY = winter half year [ONDJFM]) were considered.
Trend analyses for the intensity of the precipitation anomalies were done using the mRAI at the respective timescale. The mRAI for December at the 12-month timescale (mRAI-12) was used for the evaluation of the annual variability and trends, while for the seasons the mRAI at the 3-month timescale (mRAI-3) and for the half years the mRAI at the 6-month timescale (mRAI-6) were used. The evaluation of changes in the spatial extent, duration, and frequency of dry and wet periods was also done based on annual and seasonal data. Here, the information of the indices that is available in monthly resolution (one value each month that looks three months backward) was aggregated to seasonal and annual data by averaging the respective monthly data.
Simple linear regression (least squares method) is used to identify the long-term changes within different study periods (e.g., 1901–2015 and 1951–2015). Although many climate elements do not fulfil the criteria of normal distribution and statistical independency, such linear trends are still used in many climate studies. Precipitation-based indices generally show a high temporal variability at different timescales and the computed linear trends strongly depend on the values at the beginning and the end of the time series. Therefore, low pass filtered series (5-, 11-, and/or 30-year moving averages) are used in the graphics instead of displaying linear trend lines. Information on the statistical significance of the linear trends is not shown, as the focus is on the long-term temporal variability of precipitation characteristics and linear trends describe those variations insufficiently.
Long-term changes in the characteristics of dry and wet periods have been also shown by comparing the averages of different periods. Due to the large temporal variability if the index values averages over 50-year periods (1866–1915, 1916–1965, and 1966–2015) are used. The averages are computed if at least half of the stations have data available for at least 25 years during the 50-year period. No statistical test is used for assessing the statistical significance of the difference between the time slice averages.
4. Discussion
Spatial extent and duration of dry periods have decreased noticeably over Europe, particularly its northern sub-regions, while wet periods showed slight increases. Those trends agree with positive trends in precipitation extremes over the northern mid-latitudes [
72,
73]. Some of the trends intensified in the second half of the 20th century, in accordance with the temperature and precipitation trends that also show stronger signals in the most recent decades [
54,
70]. The described trends towards wetter conditions in northern Europe yet drier ones in southern Europe match recent studies on observational data [
58,
89,
90,
91] and are projected to continue through the 21st century [
57]. However, drought trends for central Europe are more diverse and often linked to temperature increases [
34,
92]. Although, several drought summers were observed at the beginning of the 21st century in Central Europe such as the summer of 2003 [
93], the period 2011/2012 [
94], the summer of 2015 [
88,
95], and the two-year drought of 2018/19 [
96,
97]. Summer drought in Central Europe is not a new phenomenon of the beginning of the 21st century. Already, the 1940s and the 1950s were very dry [
77,
78,
79]. During the summer half year of 1947, Central Europe was hit by an extraordinary drought event with wide ranging socio-economic consequences [
98] and the drought events of the early 1950s covered half of Europe at the timescale of 12 months [
35].
The presented trends in the spatial extent as well as the duration and frequency of dry and wet periods, respectively, are generally in line with the trends in average precipitation totals. Therefore, using the mRAI for the identification of dry and wet periods leads to widely comparable results to the deciles index for the spatial extent of dry and wet periods, while the average and maximum duration of such events is considerable shorter. This is related to the applied stopping rule, which refers to precipitation totals dipping under median conditions in case of mRAI and under the 30th percentile in case of the decile index. Another stopping rule for the mRAI dry/wet periods, namely mRAI values of 0.5/−0.5 instead of zero, was tested in order to evaluate the sensitivity of the indices and connected trends to the generally arbitrary thresholds of climate indices. These analyses (not presented here) showed considerably longer mRAI period durations that were even longer than the decile periods and led to a strong increase in the average spatial extent of dry and wet periods, respectively. Generally, the present analyses show that both indices are useful for studying long-lasting dry and wet periods over the different climate regimes of Europe and deliver comparable results with respect to the timing of such events and their long-term trends.
Advantages of the two indices used in this study include their straightforward computation and that they need neither specific tools or programs nor excessive data (e.g., climate, soil, or land use). Thus, they can be easily applied in many different contexts and regions. The indices do not make complex assumptions on the statistical properties of the data and still deliver comparable results to studies applying indices that are more complex. By purely focusing on precipitation, we can analyze a longer period, as would be possible if more variables are to be included in the index calculation. This is particularly important against the background of the large temporal variability of precipitation. It allows putting the trends observed in recent decades in a long-term perspective. The deciles indicator and the mRAI may be used in drought studies and at least the mRAI may be easily computed at different timescales to address the different drought types (meteorological, agricultural, hydrological, and socio-economic drought).
The clustered occurrence of long-lasting dry or wet periods over time indicates a relation of decile and mRAI periods, respectively, to long-term variations in atmospheric and/or oceanic circulation. Thus, also the observed changes in dry and wet period coverage may be due to variations in the strength and position of atmospheric circulation patterns, which distinctively effect precipitation characteristics [
99]. Mapping composite anomalies of, e.g., precipitable water and 850 hPa geopotential height or 300 hPa geopotential height and isotachs, could help to explain some of the regional precipitation (or drought) signatures described in the manuscript. The same continental atmospheric pattern affects the individual European sub-regions differently, for instance triggering wetter conditions in one, but dryer conditions in another part of Europe, which may explain the regionally different trend behavior of the characteristics of wet and dry periods. This calls for a more precise and targeted data analysis of connection between the identified spatial and temporal pattern of dry and wet periods and indices of atmospheric circulation for the individual sub-regions. Haslinger et al. [
100], e.g., studied the drivers of meteorological drought in the European Greater Alpine Region and found that the dry springs of the 1940s developed under a persistent positive pressure anomaly across Western and Central Europe, triggered by positive sea surface temperatures in the western subtropical Atlantic. Further analysis on the relation between the characteristics and trends of dry and wet periods and indices of atmospheric circulation are worthwhile, although links between the atmospheric circulation and dry and wet period occurrence cannot simply be reduced to cause–effect relationships. The great number of influential variables and interactions in meteorological and climatological studies always hampers straightforward conclusions.
The increased spatial extent of wet periods over Europe might indicate an increasing impact of synoptic-scale cyclones and their corresponding frontal systems. On the other hand, the negative trend of the spatial extent and duration of long-lasting dry periods over Europe may have been triggered by more frequent interruptions of such periods by phases of above average precipitation (e.g., more frequent convective precipitation). To confirm this, additional analyses based on daily data are necessary. Some studies that used drought indices in monthly and daily resolution and additionally studied heavy precipitation indices found simultaneous increases in the frequency of drought and heavy precipitation events over parts of Europe (i.e., Central Europe; [
88,
92]).
Such precipitation–based drought indices such as the two applied here or the widely used Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) are based on the assumption that drought is mainly influenced by the variability of precipitation and that other drought controlling factors (temperature, relative air moisture, wind speed, radiation, evaporation) do not change over time. Although the variability of precipitation is generally much larger than the one of other climatic variables, the second important assumption on the temporal stationarity of these variables is violated in a warming climate. Rising temperatures and the related increase in water pressure deficit may strongly increase the severity of droughts independent of changes in the precipitation regime. This is particularly true for the warm part of the year where the rising evaporative demand [
101] potentially increases drought frequency and severity [
61,
102]. Combining heat and drought is important because of the more severe impacts compared to individual extremes in either of the components [
103]. Thus, a drought index incorporating temperature information, such as the SPEI or the PDSI, can give additional valuable insights and support the assessment of drought severity in a changing climate [
43,
61].The recent drought events in Europe were often accompanied by extremely high temperatures or long lasting heatwaves [
88,
93,
96,
104,
105,
106]. Thus, further studies on the regional changes in drought should incorporate more complex drought indices that also account for the effects of increasing temperature extremes.
5. Conclusions
The decile indicator has been shown to be a simple but powerful tool to visualize the characteristics of long-lasting dry and wet periods in Europe. Using the mRAI delivers comparable results and additional information of the intensity of drought conditions or the degree of wetness. The comparison of the results delivered by those straightforward indices with the scientific literature that bases their conclusions on more complex and computationally intensive indices shows that the mRAI and the deciles index are suitable to study the variability and changes of dry and wet periods over Europe. Thereby, the classification of Europe into climatologically homogeneous sub-regions is helpful to interpret the regionally variable characteristics and trends.
The approach of studying dry and wet periods based on 3-month precipitation totals results in event durations of several months to years. Decile and mRAI periods start under moderate extreme conditions and linger until precipitation conditions leave the “normal range” towards the opposite extreme. A mere return to normal conditions is often insufficient to refill depleted aquifers or to equalize high groundwater levels, and thus, such dry periods may last even longer in specific water reservoirs than indicated.
Strong inter-decadal variations are described in the spatial extent, average and maximum event duration, and frequency of long-lasting dry and wet periods for Europe and the eight studied sub-regions. Nonetheless, some distinct long-term trends emerged. Spatial extent and duration of wet periods show positive trends over Europe. In contrast, dry periods show decreases, particularly in the northern sub-regions, which agrees to positive trends in precipitation averages and extremes over the northern mid-latitudes. The simultaneous increase of the frequency severely dry and severely wet years over Europe since the 1980s indicates that precipitation is getting more extreme at both sides of the rainfall distribution.
The observed decreases in spatial extent and duration of decile dry periods do not necessarily imply a decreasing drought risk. Droughts are defined on multiple timescales and also depend on climate variables other than precipitation, namely temperature, radiation, wind, and humidity. Including information on temperature in the identification of dry periods in order to assess the evaporative demand would be a next step in evaluating the practical relevance of the found precipitation variability and trends for hydrological and agricultural systems, natural ecosystems, and human economic activities.