Next Article in Journal
The Observation Path Problems and the Formation Conditions of the Elevated Layer of Black Carbon Aerosol
Next Article in Special Issue
Reconstructing Elemental Carbon Long-Term Trend in the Po Valley (Italy) from Fog Water Samples
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Composition of PM10 in 16 Urban, Industrial and Background Sites in Italy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards a Better Representation of Fog Microphysics in Large-Eddy Simulations Based on an Embedded Lagrangian Cloud Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Parameterization of Radiation Fog-Top Height and Methods Evaluation in Tianjin

1
Navigation College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
2
Tianjin Key Laboratory for Oceanic Meteorology, Tianjin Meteorological Bureau, Tianjin 300074, China
3
Laboratory of Straits Meteorology, Xiamen Meteorology Bureau, Xiamen 361012, China
4
Laboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Tianjin Meteorological Bureau, No.100 Weather Station Road Hexi District, Tianjin, 300074, China.
Atmosphere 2020, 11(5), 480; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11050480
Submission received: 25 March 2020 / Revised: 30 April 2020 / Accepted: 5 May 2020 / Published: 8 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Observation, Simulation and Predictability of Fog )

Abstract

Different methods have been developed to estimate the fog-top height of radiation fog and evaluated using the measurements obtained from a 255-m meteorological tower located in Tianjin in 2016. Different indicators of turbulence intensity, friction velocity (u*), turbulence kinetic energy (TKE), and variance of vertical velocity (σw2) were used to estimate the fog-top height, respectively. Positive correlations between the fog-top height and u*, TKE, and σw2 were observed, with empirical parameterization schemes H = 583.35 × u * 1.12 , H = 205.4   ×   ( T K E ) 0.68 , and H = 420.10 × ( σ w 2 ) 0.51 being obtained. Among them, σw2 is the most appropriate indicators of turbulence intensity to estimate the fog-top height. Compared with sensible flux and condensation rate, the new form of convective velocity scale (w*) was the most appropriate indicator of buoyancy induced by radiative cooling, and the relationship H = 328.33 × w * 1.34 was obtained. σw2 and with w*, which represents the intensity of turbulence and buoyancy, were used to estimate the fog-top height. The relationship H = 396.26 ×   (σw + 0.1 ×   w*) − 16 was obtained, which can be used to accurately estimate the fog-top height. Moreover, the temperature convergence (TC) method was used to estimate the fog-top height; however, the results strongly rely on the threshold value.
Keywords: fog-top height; turbulence; radiative cooling; parameterization; surface measurements fog-top height; turbulence; radiative cooling; parameterization; surface measurements

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ju, T.; Wu, B.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J. Parameterization of Radiation Fog-Top Height and Methods Evaluation in Tianjin. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11050480

AMA Style

Ju T, Wu B, Zhang H, Liu J. Parameterization of Radiation Fog-Top Height and Methods Evaluation in Tianjin. Atmosphere. 2020; 11(5):480. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11050480

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ju, Tingting, Bingui Wu, Hongsheng Zhang, and Jingle Liu. 2020. "Parameterization of Radiation Fog-Top Height and Methods Evaluation in Tianjin" Atmosphere 11, no. 5: 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11050480

APA Style

Ju, T., Wu, B., Zhang, H., & Liu, J. (2020). Parameterization of Radiation Fog-Top Height and Methods Evaluation in Tianjin. Atmosphere, 11(5), 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11050480

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop