Indoor Air Quality Certification and Consumers’ Willingness: Taiwan’s Experience and Survey
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Indoor Air Quality
1.1.1. Definition and Its Effects
1.1.2. Organizations and Improvements
1.2. Taiwan’s Experience
1.2.1. Legislation and Regulated Places
1.2.2. Standards, Inspections, and Certifications
- Regular inspection: specific places that are under-regulated should conduct indoor air pollutant concentration measurements within a prescribed period and regularly announce the inspection and measurement results.
- Continuous monitoring: government-designated specific places must set up automatic monitoring facilities. The owner, manager, or user who approved the automatic monitoring facilities should continue to measure indoor air pollutant concentrations and display the latest measured values in real time.
- Excellent: the certification is valid for three years, within self-inspections every six months and regular inspections completed once every three years.
- Good: the certification is valid for two years, with self-inspections before regular inspection and regular inspection completed once every two years.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Design and Methods
2.2. Data and Survey Sites Selection
3. Results
3.1. Descriptive Analysis of the Results
3.1.1. Features of Samples
3.1.2. Description of Scales
3.2. Hierarchical Regression Analysis of Certification and Consume
3.2.1. Cognition Effect the Consumer’s Willingness
3.2.2. Monitors and Bulletin Enforce the Attitude
3.2.3. International Standards and Information Disclosure as the Key Factors
- International standards and monitors still have a significant effect on consumer’s willingness, in particular, the continuous monitors and bulletin is a key factor.
- Further improvement in the degree of prediction, with an effect of close to 45% (all models Adj R2 between 0.384 and 0.454).
- Some features of the respondents still have a significant influence on different models, e.g., gender in high price, living area in kindergarten, and know the law in the long-term care center.
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. The IAQ Certification and Consumers’ Willingness Questionnaire
References
- The Indoor Air Quality Information Network. Available online: https://iaq.epa.gov.tw/indoorair/introduction_importance.aspx (accessed on 1 September 2021).
- Steinemann, A.; Wargocki, P.; Rismanchi, B. Ten questions concerning green buildings and indoor air quality. Build. Environ. 2017, 112, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kozielska, B.; Mainka, A.; Zak, M.; Kaleta, D.; Mucha, W. Indoor air quality in residential buildings in Upper Silesia. Poland Build. Environ. 2020, 177, 106914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WHO. The Right to Healthy Indoor Air. Report on WHO Meeting: Bilthoven, Netherlands, 15–17 May 2000; WHO: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Introduction to Indoor Air Quality. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/introduction-indoor-air-quality (accessed on 1 September 2021).
- Hawkins, V.R.; Marcham, C.L.; Springston, J.P.; Miller, J.; Braybrooke, G.; Maunder, C.; Feng, L.; Kollmeyer, B. The Value of IAQ: A Review of the Scientific Evidence Supporting the Benefits of Investing in Better Indoor Air Quality; AIHA® Ergonomics Committee: Falls Church, VA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Licina, D.; Langer, S. Indoor air quality investigation before and after relocation to WELL-certified office buildings. Build. Environ. 2021, 204, 108182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Settimo, G.; Manigrasso, M.; Avino, P. Indoor Air Quality: A Focus on the European Legislation and State-of-the-Art Research in Italy. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Umaroğulları, F.; Seitablaiev, M.O. Regulations Regarding Indoor Air Quality. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference “Standardization, Protypes and Quality: A Means of Balkan Countries’ Collaboration”, Tirana, Albania, 21 September 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Palacios, J.; Steele, K.; Tan, Z.; Zheng, S. Human health and productivity outcomes of office workers associated with indoor air quality: A systematic review. MIT Cent. Real Estate Res. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, W.-T. Overview of Green Building Material (GBM) Policies and Guidelines with Relevance to Indoor Air Quality Management in Taiwan. Environments 2018, 5, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, W.-T.; Chiang, C.-M.; Ho, M.-C.; Chen, J.-L.; Lo, S.-C. Indoor Air Quality and Its Determinants in Taiwan Child Care Centers. J. Archit. 2011, 75, 61–80. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, M.J.; Shih, W.-C. Discussion on Indoor Air Quality in Different Space Plan in Dental Clinics. J. Archit. 2019, 110, 33–48. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, Y.-T.; Chen, Y.-K. Methods for the Diagnosis of Indoor Environment Quality on Health Affection, Evaluation in the Research Building Type of Taiwan. J. Archit. 2010, 73, 143–159. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, C.-P.; Lin, H.-K.; Cheng, J.-H. The Study of the Cognition and Evaluation of the Indoor Air Quality Management in the Department Stores-Take the Shin Kong Mitsukoshi Xinyi Place as an Example. J. Prop. Manag. 2019, 10, 13–23. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, C.-P.; Cheng, J.-H. The Study of the Cognition and Management Strategies of the Indoor Air Quality in the Living Places. J. Prop. Manag. 2020, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Goldin, L.J.; Ansher, L.; Berlin, A.; Cheng, J.; Kanopkin, D.; Khazan, A.; Kisivuli, M.; Lortie, M.; Peterson, E.B.; Laura Pohl, L.; et al. Indoor Air Quality Survey of Nail Salons in Boston. J. Immigr. Minority Health 2014, 16, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Shang, Y.; Li, B.; Baldwin, A.N.; Ding, Y.; Yu, W.; Cheng, L. Investigation of Indoor Air Quality in Shopping Malls during Summer in Western China using Subjective Survey and Field Measurement. Build. Environ. 2016, 108, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Langer, S.; Ramalho, O.; Le Ponner, E.; Derbez, M.; Kirchner, S.; Mandin, C. Perceived Indoor Air Quality and Its Relationship to Air Pollutants in French dwellings. Indoor Air 2017, 27, 1168–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, Y.; Lu, Y.; Chou, D. Indoor Air Quality Investigation of a University Library Based on Field Measurement and Questionnaire Survey. Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol. 2018, 13, 148–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong-Parodi, G.; Dias, M.B.; Taylor, M. Effect of Using an Indoor Air Quality Sensor on Perceptions of and Behaviors toward Air Pollution (Pittsburgh Empowerment Library Study): Online Survey and Interviews. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018, 6, e8273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huizenga, S.C.; Zagreus, L.A.; Arens, E. Air Quality and Thermal Comfort in Office Buildings: Results of a Large Indoor Environmental Quality Survey. Proc. Healthy Build. 2006, 3, 393–397. [Google Scholar]
- Saleem, M.; Kausar, M.A.; Khatoon, F.; Anwar, S.; Shahid SM, A.; Ginawi, T.; Hossain, A.; Al Anizy, A.A.S.A.; Alswaidan, M.A.A.; Aseeri, A.S.; et al. Association between Human Health and Indoor Air Pollution in Saudi Arabia: Indoor Environmental Quality Survey. J. Pharm. Res. Int. 2020, 32, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yap, H.S.; Roberts, A.C.; Luo, C.; Tan, Z.; Lee, E.H.; Thach, T.Q.; Kwok, K.W.; Car, J.; Soh, C.K.; Christopoulos, G. The Importance of Air Quality for Underground Spaces: An International Survey of Public Attitudes. Indoor Air 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, S.; Pernot, I.G.; Jorin, C.H.; Niculita-Hirzel, H.; Perret, V.; Licina, D. Energy, indoor air quality, occupant behavior, self-reported symptoms and satisfaction in energy-efficient dwellings in Switzerland. Build. Environ. 2020, 171, 106618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mothersbaugh, D.L.; Hawkins, D.I.; Kleiser, S.B. Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy, 14th ed.; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
Country | Organization | Country | Organization |
---|---|---|---|
Worldwide | WHO | China | AQSIQ, SEPA |
Worldwide | ISO | Malaysia | DOSH |
Worldwide | International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate | Japan | MHLW |
Worldwide | AIVC | Korea | KEITI |
USA | ASHRAE, OSHA, US EPA | Taiwan (R.O.C.) | TW EPA |
UK | HSC | Germany | MAK |
EU | REHVA The Joint Research Center CEN, the European Committee for Standardization | Canada | Health Canada |
Rank | Title | Announced Date |
---|---|---|
Act | Indoor Air Quality Act | 23 November 2011 |
Order | Indoor Air Quality Act Enforcement Rules | 23 November 2012 |
Order | Indoor Air Quality Standards | 23 November 2012 |
Order | The Regulations of Establish Specialized Personnel for Indoor Air Quality Maintenance and Management | 11 August 2016 |
Order | The Regulations of the Indoor Air Quality Inspection and Determination in Specific places | 23 November 2012 9 August 2021 (amended) |
Order | The Regulations of the Violate Indoor Air Quality Act Penalty Limits and Guidelines | 23 November 2012 |
Order | The First Batch of Specific Places Comply with the Indoor Air Quality Act | 23 January 2014 |
Order | The Second Batch of Specific Places Comply with the Indoor Air Quality Act | 11 January 2017 |
Direction | Operation Directions for Self-Management Marks of Indoor Air Quality by Environmental Protection Administration of the Executive Yuan | 2 July 2021 |
Other | Indoor Air Quality Maintenance and Management Plan Document | June 2016 (amended) |
Item | Standard Values | Unit | |
---|---|---|---|
CO2 | 8 h | 1000 | ppm |
CO | 8 h | 9 | ppm |
HCHO | 1 h | 0.08 | ppm |
TVOC | 1 h | 0.56 | ppm |
Bacteria | Highest value | 1500 | CFU/m3 |
Fungi | Highest value | 1000 | CFU/m3 |
PM10 | 24 h | 75 | μg/m3 |
PM2.5 | 24 h | 35 | μg/m3 |
O3 | 8 h | 0.06 | ppm |
Place | Indoor Air Pollutant Items | Monitoring Period | Excellent Level Standard (Unit) | Good Level Standard (Unit) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gym/kindergarten | CO2 | 8 h | 800 (ppm) | 1000 (ppm) |
HCHO | 1 h | 0.03 (ppm) | 0.08 (m) | |
Bacteria | Highest value | 800 (CFU/m3) | 1500 (CFU/m3) | |
PM10 | 24 h | 50 (μg/m3) | 75 (μg/m3) | |
Long-term care center * (social welfare institutions) | CO2 | 8 h | 800 (ppm) | 1000 (ppm) |
CO | 8 h | 2 (ppm) | 9 (ppm) | |
HCHO | 1 h | 0.03 (ppm) | 0.08 (ppm) | |
Bacteria | Highest value | 800 (CFU/m3) | 1500 (CFU/m3) | |
PM10 | 24 h | 50 (μg/m3) | 75 (μg/m3) |
Survey Site | Banqiao (N = 189) | Wuri (N = 148) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Items | Frequency | Percentage | Frequency | Percentage | |
Gender | Female | 133 | 70.4% | 99 | 66.9% |
Male | 56 | 29.6% | 49 | 33.1% | |
Age | Under 20 | 7 | 3.7% | 14 | 9.5% |
21–30 | 21 | 11.1% | 36 | 24.3% | |
31–40 | 37 | 19.6% | 20 | 13.5% | |
41–50 | 41 | 21.7% | 34 | 23.0% | |
51–60 | 41 | 21.7% | 34 | 23.0% | |
Above 61 | 42 | 22.2% | 10 | 6.8% | |
Marriage | Married | 120 | 63.5% | 73 | 49.3% |
Unmarried | 69 | 36.5% | 75 | 50.7% | |
Education | Junior high school | 17 | 9.0% | 10 | 6.8% |
High school | 29 | 15.3% | 27 | 18.2% | |
College | 19 | 10.1% | 13 | 8.8% | |
University | 71 | 37.6% | 72 | 48.6% | |
Master or PhD | 53 | 28.0% | 26 | 17.6% | |
Air allergy | Yes | 82 | 43.4% | 74 | 50.0% |
No | 104 | 55.0% | 74 | 50.0% | |
Missing | 3 | 1.6% | 0 | 0% | |
Know the 1aw | Yes | 83 | 43.9% | 85 | 57.4% |
No | 100 | 52.9% | 52 | 35.1% | |
Missing | 6 | 3.2% | 11 | 7.4% |
Item | N | Percentage | Item | N | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM2.5 | 230 | 68.9% | TVOC | 149 | 44.6% |
CO2 | 213 | 63.8% | Bacteria | 129 | 38.6% |
HCHO | 213 | 63.8% | O3 | 127 | 38.0% |
PM10 | 183 | 54.8% | Fungi | 75 | 22.5% |
CO | 177 | 53.0% | None | 22 | 6.7% |
Places | N | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Medical institutions | 186 | 55.7% |
Mass rapid transit system stations | 155 | 46.4% |
Libraries | 153 | 45.8% |
Government offices | 139 | 41.6% |
Railway stations/airports | 132 | 39.5% |
Scale | Items | N | Mean | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Certification cognition | Certification classification | 335 | 4.4687 | 0.72472 |
Comply with international standards * | 334 | 4.4461 | 0.69431 | |
Certification display | Monitoring equipment and bulletin board | 327 | 4.3670 | 0.68723 |
Replace paper poster | 327 | 4.2813 | 0.76366 | |
Consumer’s willingness | Willing to pay a higher price | 327 | 4.1468 | 0.87388 |
Case1: Gym | 327 | 4.3700 | 0.75986 | |
Case2: Kindergarten | 327 | 4.5443 | 0.64377 | |
Case3: Long-term Care Center | 326 | 4.5583 | 0.62362 |
Independent Variables | Model 1 Pay High Price | Model 2 Gym | Model 3 Kindergarten | Model 4 Long-Term Care Center | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | (S.E.) | B | (S.E.) | B | (S.E.) | B | (S.E.) | |
Certification cognition Classification Comply with the international standards | 0.291 ** 0.368 *** | (0.105) (0.098) | 0.305 *** 0.352 *** | (0.078) (0.071) | 0.264 *** 0.345 *** | (0.067) (0.062) | 0.418 *** 0.175 ** | (0.067) (0.062) |
Control Variables | ||||||||
Gender | −0.232 * | (0.101) | 0.063 | (0.075) | −0.006 | (0.065) | 0.059 | (0.064) |
Age | 0.060 | (0.114) | −0.014 | (0.085) | 0.011 | (0.073) | 0.010 | (0.073) |
Marriage | −0.221 | (0.113) | −0.081 | (0.084) | 0.016 | (0.072) | −0.042 | (0.072) |
Education | 0.043 | (0.111) | −0.149 | (0.082) | −0.022 | (0.070) | −0.062 | (0.070) |
Air allergy | −0.064 | (0.096) | −0.069 | (0.071) | −0.065 | (0.061) | −0.060 | (0.061) |
Know the law | −0.088 | (0.096) | −0.038 | (0.071) | −0.018 | (0.061) | −0.083 | (0.061) |
Area | 0.030 | (0.096) | −0.069 | (0.071) | −0.135 * | (0.061) | −0.066 | (0.061) |
Constant | 1.024 ** | (0.358) | 2.017 *** | (0.264) | 1.867 *** | (0.226) | 1.825 *** | (0.225) |
Statistics | N = 265 | N = 265 | N = 265 | N = 265 | ||||
F(9255) = 10.310 | F(9255) = 15.559 | F(9255) = 17.743 | F(9255) = 17.858 | |||||
p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | |||||
R2 = 0.267 | R2 = 0.354 | R2 = 0.385 | R2 = 0.387 | |||||
Adj R2 = 0.244 | Adj R2 = 0.332 | Adj R2 = 0.363 | Adj R2 = 0.365 |
Independent Variables | Model 1 Pay High Price | Model 2 Gym | Model 3 Kindergarten | Model 4 Long-Term Care Center | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | (S.E.) | B | (S.E.) | B | (S.E.) | B | (S.E.) | |
Certification display Monitors and bulletin Replace paper poster | 0.667 *** 0.157 * | (0.087) (0.077) | 0.617 *** 0.022 | (0.070) (0.062) | 0.475 *** 0.095 | (0.061) (0.054) | 0.488 *** 0.092 | (0.061) (0.054) |
Control Variables | ||||||||
Gender | −0.176 | (0.092) | 0.102 | (0.075) | 0.020 | (0.065) | 0.075 | (0.064) |
Age | −0.028 | (0.104) | −0.073 | (0.084) | −0.048 | (0.073) | −0.024 | (0.072) |
Marriage | −0.115 | (0.104) | −0.019 | (0.084) | 0.065 | (0.073) | 0.008 | (0.072) |
Education | 0.122 | (0.101) | −0.081 | (0.082) | 0.007 | (0.071) | −0.020 | (0.070) |
Air allergy | −0.066 | (0.087) | −0.079 | (0.070) | −0.070 | (0.061) | −0.051 | (0.060) |
Know the 1aw | −0.193 * | (0.087) | −0.121 | (0.071) | −0.111 | (0.061) | −0.166 ** | (0.060) |
Area | 0.076 | (0.088) | −0.059 | (0.071) | −0.107 | (0.061) | −0.048 | (0.061) |
Constant | 1.114 * | (0.437) | 2.038 *** | (0.354) | 2.415 *** | (0.306) | 2.032 *** | (0.210) |
Statistics | N = 266 | N = 266 | N = 266 | N = 266 | ||||
F(9256) = 18.478 | F(9256) = 18.036 | F(9256) = 17.488 | F(9256) = 18.641 | |||||
p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | |||||
R2 = 0.394 | R2 = 0.388 | R2 = 0.381 | R2 = 0.396 | |||||
Adj R2 = 0.372 | Adj R2 = 0.367 | Adj R2 = 0.359 | Adj R2 = 0.375 |
Independent Variables | Model 1 Pay High Price | Model 2 Gym | Model 3 Kindergarten | Model 4 Long-Term Care Center | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | (S.E.) | B | (S.E.) | B | (S.E.) | B | (S.E.) | |
Certification cognition Classification Comply with the international standards | 0.036 0.197 * | (0.100) 0(.091) | 0.143 0.229 ** | (0.077) (0.070) | 0.110 0.261 *** | (0.066) (0.060) | 0.277 *** 0.086 | (0.066) (0.060) |
Certification display Monitors and bulletin Replace paper poster | 0.563 *** 0.118 ** | (0.090) (0.079) | 0.422 *** −0.017 | (0.073) (0.061) | 0.332 *** 0.067 | (0.063) (0.052) | 0.334 *** 0.032 | (0.062) (0.052) |
Control Variables | ||||||||
Gender | −0.183 * | (0.092) | 0.090 | (0.070) | 0.018 | (0.060) | 0.085 | (0.060) |
Age | −0.011 | (0.103) | −0.061 | (0.079) | −0.028 | (0.068) | −0.030 | (0.068) |
Marriage | −0.119 | (0.103) | −0.028 | (0.079) | 0.064 | (0.068) | 0.010 | (0.067) |
Education | 0.131 | (0.101) | −0.083 | (0.077) | 0.030 | (0.067) | −0.010 | (0.066) |
Air allergy | −0.050 | (0.086) | −0.055 | (0.066) | −0.055 | (0.057) | −0.050 | (0.056) |
Know the law | −0.155 | (0.087) | −0.072 | (0.067) | −0.049 | (0.058) | −0.117 * | (0.057) |
Area | 0.074 | (0.087) | −0.049 | (0.067) | −0.116 * | (0.057) | −0.044 | (0.057) |
Constant | 0.513 | (0.476) | 1.293 *** | (0.364) | 1.601 *** | (0.314) | 1.618 *** | (0.311) |
Statistics | N = 265 | N = 265 | N = 265 | N = 265 | ||||
F(11,253) = 15.990 | F(11,253) = 18.613 | F(11,253) = 20.288 | F(11,253) = 20.944 | |||||
p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | |||||
R2 = 0.410 | R2 = 0.447 | R2 = 0.469 | R2 = 0.477 | |||||
Adj R2 = 0.384 | Adj R2 = 0.423 | Adj R2 = 0.446 | Adj R2 = 0.454 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hu, C.-P.; Cheng, J.-H. Indoor Air Quality Certification and Consumers’ Willingness: Taiwan’s Experience and Survey. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12101320
Hu C-P, Cheng J-H. Indoor Air Quality Certification and Consumers’ Willingness: Taiwan’s Experience and Survey. Atmosphere. 2021; 12(10):1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12101320
Chicago/Turabian StyleHu, Chih-Pei, and Jen-Hsiung Cheng. 2021. "Indoor Air Quality Certification and Consumers’ Willingness: Taiwan’s Experience and Survey" Atmosphere 12, no. 10: 1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12101320
APA StyleHu, C. -P., & Cheng, J. -H. (2021). Indoor Air Quality Certification and Consumers’ Willingness: Taiwan’s Experience and Survey. Atmosphere, 12(10), 1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12101320