Next Article in Journal
Description and Evaluation of the Fine Particulate Matter Forecasts in the NCAR Regional Air Quality Forecasting System
Next Article in Special Issue
Self-Organization through the Inner Heliosphere: Insights from Parker Solar Probe
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment and Improvement of Two Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor Systems by Using Spatial Interpolation Data from Air Quality Monitoring Stations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Accelerated Climate Changes in Weddell Sea Region of Antarctica Detected by Extreme Values Theory
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Assessment of Trends and Uncertainties in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Height Estimated Using Radiosounding Observations over Europe

Atmosphere 2021, 12(3), 301; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12030301
by Fabio Madonna 1,*, Donato Summa 1,2,*, Paolo Di Girolamo 2, Fabrizio Marra 1, Yuanzu Wang 1,3 and Marco Rosoldi 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Atmosphere 2021, 12(3), 301; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12030301
Submission received: 3 February 2021 / Revised: 17 February 2021 / Accepted: 18 February 2021 / Published: 25 February 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please, see the attached review.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

In attached pdf file, a point-by-point reply to the reviewer's comments is provided.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This study analysed the uncertainties in the atmospheric2boundary layer height over Europe. IGRA and ERA5 data were used to analyse the atmospheric2boundary layer height. The study performed a comprehensive analysis and the manuscript is technically sound for publication in the atmosphere. The originality of the manuscript is sufficient for publication. However, some minor issues need to be incorporated before it’s final publication

  1. The first sentence of the abstract could have been attractive and simple sentence. Authors may re-write it with a little background. Authors should avoid complex sentence.
  2. Abstract is well written and contains many informations. Authors should include some key findings in the abstract section.
  3. Line 129, authors should define IGRA first and then use abbreviation.
  4. Line 145, for standard reference pressure author, should include a reference.
  5. Figure 3, authors need to discuss a bit more. Why is the IRGA density profile significantly different for day and night time?

 

 

Author Response

In attached pdf file, a point-by-point reply to the reviewer's comments is provided.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop