Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Analysis of Emissions from a Compression–Ignition Engine Powered by Diesel, Rapeseed Biodiesel, and Biodiesel from Chlorella protothecoides Biomass Cultured under Different Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of Aquatic Refuge Habitats for Fish, and Threats in the Context of Climate Change and Human Impact, during Seasonal Hydrological Drought in the Saxon Villages Area (Transylvania, Romania)
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of COVID-19 Confinement Measures on the Air Quality in an Urban-Industrial Area of Portugal
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comparison of the Characteristics of Drought during the Late 20th and Early 21st Centuries over Eastern Europe, Western Russia and Central North America
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Analysis of Long-Term Trends in the Meteorological and Hydrological Drought Occurrences Using Non-Parametric Methods—Case Study of the Catchment of the Upper Noteć River (Central Poland)

by
Katarzyna Kubiak-Wójcicka
1,2,*,
Agnieszka Pilarska
1 and
Dariusz Kamiński
3,4
1
Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Lwowska 1, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
2
Centre for Underwater Archaeology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Lwowska 1, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
3
Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Lwowska 1, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
4
Centre for Climate Change Research, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Lwowska 1, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2021, 12(9), 1098; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12091098
Submission received: 16 July 2021 / Revised: 19 August 2021 / Accepted: 20 August 2021 / Published: 25 August 2021

Abstract

:
The study aims to identify long-term trends in the changes of drought occurrences using the Mann-Kendall (MK) test and the Theil-Sen estimator. Trend research was carried out on the example of the catchment area of the Upper Noteć River, which covers an agricultural area of Poland with some of the lowest water reserves. The meteorological droughts were identified based on the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), while the hydrological droughts were determined on the basis of the Standardized Runoff Index (SRI) in various time scales (1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months) in the period of 1981–2016. The relationship between SPI and SRI was determined on the basis of the Pearson correlation analysis. The results showed that statistically significant trends (at the significance level of 0.05) were identified at 3 out of 8 meteorological stations (downward trend at Kłodawa station and upward trend for drought at Sompolno and Kołuda Wielka stations). Statistically significant hydrological droughts showed an increase in occurrences at the Łysek station, while a downward trend was noted at the Noć Kalina station. No trend was found at the Pakość station. The analysis of the correlation between meteorological and hydrological droughts showed a strong relationship in dry years. The maximum correlation coefficient was identified in longer accumulation periods i.e., 6 and 9 months. The example of the catchment of the Upper Noteć River points to the necessity of using several indicators in order to assess the actual condition of the water reserves.

1. Introduction

Drought is a natural disaster characterized by long-term water scarcity [1,2,3]. Drought is one of the most serious natural threats that causes damage to various aspects of the environment, society, and economy [4,5]. No universal definition of drought has been established due to the wide variability in water supply and demand worldwide [6,7]. There are four categories of drought in the literature: meteorological, agricultural, hydrological, and socioeconomic [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Drought damage is a serious issue in numerous countries around the world. Due to its nature, drought is difficult to monitor, and its effects are often poorly documented. Among the various sectors of the economy, agriculture is one of the most vulnerable to drought, where its effects are also most noticeable [14,15,16]. Numerous reports and scientific articles indicate that forecasts of future climate conditions suggest an increase in the frequency and intensity of droughts in some regions of the world [17,18,19,20,21]. The increase in the frequency of drought occurrence in recent years has not been limited to arid and semi-arid regions [22,23,24,25,26], but has been gradually becoming more common in regions with a temperate and humid climate [27,28,29,30,31,32]. Poland, which has one of the most limited water resources in Europe [33], is among those regions experiencing an increase in drought frequency [34]. The distribution of water resources in Poland has been diversified in terms of time and space. In the current climate, many regions of the country often suffer from water scarcity. In the future, this scarcity may become even more serious, and the availability of water resources might become limited. In recent years, only slight changes in annual precipitation totals have been recorded in Poland, however a noticeable shift has been observed in seasonal and monthly precipitation distribution [35,36]. Moreover, there have been quite significant changes in thermal conditions, characterized by a great increase in air temperature over a multi-year period [37]. As a result of these changes, temporary difficulties in water supply have been recorded in some areas of Poland [38]. This problem will be particularly harmful for the agricultural regions of the country. Polish agriculture is largely dependent on precipitation, which is highly variable both in terms of its temporal and spatial characteristics. Plant production is reliant mainly on water obtained from precipitation and available to plants by means of water-retentive soil [39]. In the event of a drought in agricultural areas, crop irrigation is required, especially during the growing season [40].
Drought studies in Poland have been conducted at a regional and local level. Previously published drought analyses mainly refer to the classification of drought types using various drought indicators [41,42,43], monitoring of drought conditions [44,45,46,47], as well as the characteristics of the drought, including its duration, intensity, size and frequency [48].
This study focuses on the research of drought trends in the period of 1981–2016, in a particularly drought-susceptible area of Poland. The analysis of drought trends in the long term might indicate the direction of possible near-future changes. The case study focuses on the catchment of the Upper Noteć River, which is a heavily exploited agricultural area with some of the lowest reserves of water.
The main objectives of this study included:
(1)
the identification of meteorological droughts based on SPI indicators, and hydrological droughts based on SRI indicators in various time scales (1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months)
(2)
trend determination using the Mann-Kendall (MK) test and Theil-Sen estimator
(3)
the determination of a relationship between SPI and SRI by means of Pearson’s correlation analysis.
The obtained results will help the departments of state administration, responsible for water resources management, make informed decisions and establish a long-term local development strategy, regulating the sustainable management of water resources.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Dataset

The research was carried out in Poland, a region located in a temperate climate zone with a predominance of polar-sea air masses. The amount of precipitation in Poland varies temporally and spatially. The average annual precipitation in Poland recorded in the period of 1981–2010 was 603 mm. The lowest annual precipitation total of 500 mm was observed in the central part of the country, and the highest—970 mm, in the south of Poland [49]. The area covered by the analysis includes the Upper Noteć catchment, closed by the water gauge in Pakość (Figure 1). The catchment area up to the Pakość station is 2301.98 km2. This catchment is located in the historical region of Kujawy, which is extremely important for agriculture. Arable land within the catchment area accounts for 76.07% of the catchment area, while forest areas account for 11.4%. It is also the region with the lowest annual precipitation in Poland and the area with the highest water shortages in agriculture [50].
The data used in this work are derived from historical series of daily precipitation totals recorded at 8 meteorological stations (Izbica Kujawska, Kołuda Wielka, Pakość, Sompolno, Strzelno, Gniezno, Janowiec Wielkopolski, Kłodawa). Air temperature measurements were obtained from the Kołuda Wielka station. Discharge data were obtained from 3 hydrological stations: Łysek, Noć Kalina and Pakość. Meteorological and hydrological data for the period of 1980–2016 were obtained from the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management—National Research Institute. Daily values were converted into monthly values for the purpose of extended calculations.
In terms of annual precipitation, the Upper Noteć area is one of the regions with the lowest precipitation in Poland. Total annual precipitation in the period of 1980–2016 ranged from 500.1 mm (Kołuda Wielka) to 542.5 mm (Strzelno) (Table 1). The highest precipitation totals were recorded in 2010 at most meteorological stations. The exceptions were Kłodawa, with the maximum precipitation occurring in 2001, and Kołuda Wielka and Strzelno, with the maximum recorded precipitation in 1980. The lowest precipitation totals were recorded at most stations in 1989, with the exception of the stations in Gniezno and Janowiec, where the lowest annual precipitation were recorded in 1982, and Izbica Kujawska, where the lowest totals occurred in 2011. Air temperature measurements were carried out only at the meteorological station in Kołuda Wielka. The average annual air temperature at the meteorological station in Kołuda Wielka in 1980–2016 was 8.5 °C, and the highest average annual air temperature was recorded in 1989 (9.8 °C) (Figure 2).
In terms of hydrology, the catchment area of the Upper Noteć is categorised as one of the areas with the most limited water resources [58]. According to Tomaszewski and Kubiak-Wójcicka [59], the average long-term unit runoff of the Noteć measured at the Pakość water gauge in the period of 1951–2015 amounted to 2.41 dm3·s−1·km−2. This is the lowest unit runoff value recorded in Poland, with an average of 5.5 dm3·s−1·km−2 [34]. Both precipitation and discharge in the catchment area of the Upper Noteć River are among the lowest in Poland. During the analysed period of 1980–2016, the unit runoff of the Noteć River at the Pakość station was 2.21 dm3·s−1·km−2. The highest values of the maximum discharge were recorded in July 1980 at all hydrological stations. The maximum discharge at the Pakość station was 69.3 m3·s−1 (unit runoff 30.1 dm3·s−1·km−2), and the lowest discharge was recorded in October 2003 (0.23 dm3·s−1·km−2) (Table 2). At the Noć Kalina station, the lowest discharge was recorded in September 1989 and August 1992. However, the lowest discharge at the Łysek station was recorded from August to December 2015 and in January 2016, at which time virtually no discharge occurred in the watercourse bed.

2.2. Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and Standardized Runoff Index (SRI)

Two indicators were used to determine droughts: the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), which defines meteorological droughts, and the Standardized Runoff Index (SRI), which defines hydrological droughts. Data from 8 meteorological stations: 5 located within the catchment area of the Noteć River (Pakość, Strzelno, Sompolno, Izbica Kujawska, Kołuda Wielka) and 3 in its close vicinity (Kłodawa, Gniezno and Janowiec Wielkopolski) were used to determine meteorological droughts.
The Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) is one of the most frequently used indicators of a meteorological drought, and was developed on the basis of the normalization of precipitation probabilities [60]. This indicator defines a precipitation deficit and allows the monitoring of droughts in different time frames. The SPI is recommended by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) for determining the phenomenon of drought [61]. For more information on the formulation of SPI, its advantages and limitations, see papers [62,63,64].
The SPI was calculated on the basis of monthly precipitation totals for 5 meteorological stations in the upper catchment area of the Noteć River (Izbica Kujawska, Strzelno, Kołuda Wielka, Sompolno and Pakość) and 3 stations in its close vicinity (Kłodawa, Gniezno and Janowiec Wielkopolski). The daily precipitation data were aggregated into monthly time scales, and fitted to a two-parameter gamma distribution function. The SPI was calculated for each month at different timescales. Therefore, 5 different time series were analysed, i.e., 1-, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months. SPI values define the deviation from the median expressed in units of standard deviation, which was calculated according to the formula:
S P I ,   S R I = f x µ σ
  • SPI, SRI—Standardized Precipitation Index, Standardized Runoff Index
  • f x —transformed sum of precipitation, discharges
  • µ—mean value of the normalized index x
  • σ—standard deviation of index x
In order to calculate the SPI, the compliance of the distribution of the transformed variable f(P) with the normality distribution was tested using the x2—Pearson normality test [65].
The Standardized Runoff Index (SRI) is calculated according to the same procedure as the SPI, however it is based on the discharge data [66,67,68,69]. A 2-parameter logarithmic function was used as a normalizing function when calculating the SRI [70]. The detailed calculation method is presented in the study [9,47]. The probabilities were transformed into standard normal distribution. The application of SPI allows for the differentiation of the intensity of a drought using a set of SPI thresholds: −1, −1.5, −2 and 1.0, 1.5, 2 for moderate, severe and extreme droughts and precipitations, respectively [28].
The proposed approach is based on the assessment of water resources under different hydroclimatic conditions and the determination of different intensity classes. The adoption of standardized indicators allowed for the classification of drought intensity, which is presented in Table 3. Extreme events were identified for the indicator values above 1.0, when rainy periods occur, and for the indicator values below −1.0, when there are droughts.

2.3. Mann–Kendall Test

The Mann–Kendall test [71,72] is a non-parametric statistical method used to determine whether a time series has a monotonic upward or a downward trend. It is a rank-based procedure that is particularly suitable for data with abnormal distribution that contain outliers and non-linear trends [73].
The Mann–Kendall S statistic is described with the Formula (2):
S = k = 1 n 1 j = k + 1 n s g n ( x j x k )
s g n x j x k = + 1   i f   x j x k > 0 0   i f   ( x j x k ) = 0 1   i f   ( x j x k ) < 0
where:
  • xj and xk—values of the variable in individual years j and k, where j > k,
  • n—the series count (number of years).
Positive “S” values represent an upward trend, while negative values indicate a downward one. The calculation of “sgn (xjxk)” is done via Equation (3).
The S statistic shows a tendency to quickly move towards normality, and for n > 10 this statistic has an approximately normal distribution with the mean of 0 and the variance described by the Formula (4):
V a r S = n n 1 2 n + 5 / 18
The normalized Z test statistic is determined by the Formula (5):
Z = S 1 V a r S   i f   S > 0 0   i f   S = 0 S + 1 V a r S   i f   S < 0
In the Mann–Kendall test, the null hypothesis is that there is no significant trend in the data series. The trend is significant if the null hypothesis cannot be accepted. The acceptance region at the significance level of α = 0.05 is defined by the range of −1.96 ≤ Z ≤ 1.96 (no significant trend), while the rejection region was determined by Z < −1.96 (significant downward trend) and Z > 1.96 (significant upward trend), where Z is the normalized test statistic [47].
The non-parametric Mann–Kendall test is commonly used to quantify trends in hydrometeorological time series [74,75], despite some limitations [76,77,78,79].

2.4. Sen’s Slope

The Mann–Kendall test is an effective method of identifying trends in a time series, but does not indicate the magnitude of the trends. The test might be supplemented with a non-parametric Sen’s method. In order to estimate the actual slope of the existing trend, the non-parametric Sen’s method was used [80]. The main advantage of the Sen’s slope estimator is its resistance to the presence of extreme values [81].
The slope β expressed by the Theil–Sen estimator (β) is described by the Formula (6):
β = M e d i a n x j x k / j k
A positive value of β indicates an upward (increasing) trend, and a negative value indicates a downward (decreasing) trend in the time series.
The Mann–Kendall test and Theil–Sen estimator were performed by means of a RStudio [82] with packages: “readxl” [83] and “trend” [84]. Information about what equations are used in the “trend” package for Mann–Kendall test and Theil–Sen estimator is available at [85].
QGIS ver. 3.10.9 and QGIS ver. 3.10.9 with GRASS ver. 7.8.3. were used in the study. Additionally, GIMP ver. 2.10.18 and Inkscape ver. 1.0.1 were used as graphic tools. In preparation of the Figure 3 the Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) interpolation was used.

2.5. Pearson’s Correlation Analysis

The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used to detect the relationship between meteorological droughts and hydrological droughts. With the use of this coefficient, it was possible to determine the linear relationship between the SPI and SRI variables in different accumulation periods. The value of the correlation coefficient is in a closed range [−1, 1]. The greater its absolute value, the stronger the linear relationship between the variables. 0—means there is no linear relation, 1—means a positive relation, and −1—means a negative relation between the variables.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Characteristics of Droughts in the Period of 1981–2016

SPI values were calculated separately for all eight weather stations for the time scales of 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Depending on the selected accumulation period, the range of SPI values was different for individual meteorological stations, as follows: SPI−1 from −3.54 to 3.59, SPI−3 from −3.01 to 2.94, SPI−6 from −3.32 to 2.65, SPI−9 from −3.47 to 2.93 and SPI−12 from −3.38 to 2.77 (Table 4). The longer the indicator’s accumulation period, the lower the drought intensity. The most intense meteorological droughts were recorded in the following periods: 1982–1985, 1989–1996, 2002–2006, 2008–2009. The number of months with drought occurrences varied, depending on the period of accumulation and distribution of individual meteorological stations. In the 1-month accumulation period, the number of months with drought occurrences (values ≤ −1.0) ranged from 62 to 73 months i.e., from 14.3% to 16.9% of all the months in the analysed multi-year period of 1981–2016. On the other hand, wet months with SPI values ≥ 1.0 lasted from 52 to 71 months i.e., from 12.0% to 16.4% of the analysed time period. In the case of SPI−1, the droughts lasted the longest in Kłodawa, and were the shortest in Kołuda and Strzelno. The highest number of months with drought occurrences (SPI ≤ −1.0) in the 3-month accumulation period was recorded at the Kłodawa station (81 months), and the lowest in Kołuda Wielka (66 months). In the longer accumulation periods i.e., 6, 9 and 12 months, the number of months was similar and amounted to 60 to 75 months for SPI−6, 59 to 74 months for SPI−9 and 59 to 79 months for SPI−12.
Greater differentiation was recorded in the cases of hydrological drought occurrences (SRI) at the station in Łysek, Noć Kalina and Pakość (Table 5). The SRI values in Łysek were characterized by the largest range i.e., from −5.22 to 2.00. The most intense droughts were recorded from April to December of 2016, which was related to relatively minor discharges of the Noteć River during this period. At the Noć Kalina station, the SRI values recorded were from −3.16 to 2.49. The most intense hydrological droughts were recorded from May to September of 1990, depending on the period of accumulation. The SRI values in Pakość were characterized by a lower amplitude and ranged from −2.33 to 3.05. The number of months with SRI values below −1.0 ranged from 75 to 81 months, and in Noć Kalina—from 77 to 101 months.
The hydrological droughts (SRI ≥ −1.0) at the station in Łysek were characterized by a short duration, from 6.5% to 8.3% of the analysed period, and high intensity. The number of wet months (SRI ≥ 1.0) ranged from 6.0% to 9.3% of all the months of the analysed multiannual period. The largest number of months with SRI values ≤ −1.0 was recorded at the Noć Kalina station i.e., from 17.9% to 23.4% of the analysed multi-year period, while the wet months constituted between 13.4% and 17.6% of this period. The hydrological station in Pakość closes the catchment area of the Upper Noteć River. The lower intensity of hydrological droughts at the Pakość station and their much shorter duration compared to the Noć Kalina and Łysek stations may have resulted from anthropogenic activities carried out in the area. These activities were mainly related to the lignite open pits, which ran south of the Łysek and Noć Kalina stations (Lubstów), as well as the operation of a new open pit mine located north of the Łysek station (Tomisławice).
The spatial distribution of the number of months with meteorological drought occurrences in the catchment area of the Upper Noteć is shown in Figure 3. The number of months with droughts in the accumulation period of 1 month does not present large spatial differentiation. Larger differences are noticeable in the period of 3- and 12-month accumulation. In the case of SPI−3, the months with droughts in the southern part of the catchment lasted the longest, while in the SPI−12 period they were the longest in the western part of the catchment.
Figure 4 shows the average values of SPI from 8 stations as well as the development of hydrological drought occurrences (SRI) recorded at the station in Pakość. The number of months with averaged meteorological droughts is between 13.4 and 15% of all the analysed months. As presented in Figure 4, the development of hydrological droughts is related to meteorological droughts.

3.2. Trends in Meteorological and Hydrological Drought Occurrences

The results of the trend analysis for a series of SPI values (time scales of 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months) for individual meteorological stations are presented in Table 6. A statistically insignificant trend was noted at most meteorological stations. Out of eight meteorological stations, a statistically significant upward trend was recorded at only two stations, and a downward trend at one station (the drought intensified). The downward trend in the SPI value for the meteorological station in Kłodawa means that the meteorological drought increases in the period of accumulation of 3–12 months. The Z value obtained for the Kłodawa station was relatively high and ranged from −1.817 to −4.317, and the Theil–Sen slope was between −0.0007 and −0.0018. The test results for the Kłodawa station (Table 6 and Table 7) show that the expected Z value is negative for the indices, and the Theil–Sen slope is also always negative.
The upward trend in the SPI value at the stations in Sompolno and Kołuda Wielka indicates that the phenomenon of meteorological drought is decreasing. The highest Z values, between 3.25 and 5.08, were obtained during the 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-month accumulation periods, while the Theil–Sen slope values were between 0.009 and 0.0019.
In the case of hydrological droughts, a statistically significant downward trend was recorded at the Łysek station in all analysed periods of accumulation. This means a noticeable increase in drought occurrences in the analysed multi-year period of 1981–2016. Z values were negative and ranged from −5.34 to −6.27, while Theil–Sen values were between −0.0013 to −0.0019. An upward trend was recorded at the Noć Kalina station. Z values ranged from 2.21 to 4.07, while the Theil–Sen slope ranged from 0.0008 to 0.0017. In the case of Pakość station, the trend was statistically insignificant. The Z value calculated in the 12-month accumulation period in Pakość approaches the region of a trend acceptance, which might indicate that the trend in Pakość in the longer accumulation period is determined by the occurrence of hydrological droughts at the Łysek station.
Spatial distributions of trends (significant and insignificant) for a series of SPI and SRI values for the 1, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-month time scales are shown in Figure 3.

3.3. Correlations between SPI and SRI Values

In order to establish the relationship between meteorological droughts occurring in the catchment area of the Upper Noteć and hydrological droughts, an analysis of the correlation between the SPI and SRI indices was carried out using the Pearson correlation analysis. The results showed that the strongest correlation between SPI and SRI in the analysed period of 1981–2016 was obtained at the 12-month time scale (r = 0.51) (Figure 5). In the case of individual years, the highest correlation indicators between hydrological and meteorological droughts varied depending on the length of the accumulation period. The strength of the relationship between SPI and SRI in the catchment area of the Upper Noteć River was higher for long accumulation periods (6 and 9 months), and lower for the short ones (1 and 3 months). The highest correlation values for the 1-month accumulation period were recorded in 1998 (r = 0.76), while for the 3-month accumulation period the highest values were recorded in 1982 (r = 0.83) and 1996 (r = 0.81). For the 6-month accumulation period, the maximum correlation index was recorded in 1987 (r = 0.94) and in 1982 (r = 0.91). High values were obtained in 1987 for the 9-month accumulation period (r = 0.94) and the 12-month accumulation period (r = 0.90).

3.4. Discussion

Understanding the changes in the intensity of droughts in the past and being able to predict expected changes over different time scales is incredibly important, as precipitation-driven hydrological processes (e.g., evapotranspiration and surface and groundwater discharge) affect all water reserves [86]. In this study, we found that in the analysed period of 1981–2016, there was a relationship between the occurrence of meteorological and hydrological droughts. The strength of this relationship varied. The analysed multi-year period of 1981–2016 showed a high variability, from dry years (SPI ≤ −1.0) to wet years (SPI ≥ 1.0), which can be concluded from the SPI values in various time scales. The driest years included 1982, 1989, 1992, 2003 and 2015. In these years, meteorological droughts covering not only the region of Poland, but parts of Europe, were recorded. Meteorological droughts which have occurred in Europe since the beginning of the 21st century, and were accompanied by heat waves in 2003, 2006, 2010, 2015, are great examples of such phenomena [87,88,89,90,91].
In the studied area, an increase in the intensity of meteorological droughts (downward trend) was observed at only one out of eight meteorological stations. A statistically significant, clear upward trend in SPI drought was identified at two stations. More distinct trends, but opposite in direction, were observed in the case of hydrological droughts recorded at the stations in Łysek and Noć Kalina. The obtained statistics for the Pakość station, calculated in the 12-month accumulation period, point to the rejection of the null hypothesis on the lack of a statistically significant trend. The same direction of changes in the trend was recorded at the Łysek and Pakość stations. This means an increase in the intensity of hydrological droughts. In the longer accumulation period, the occurrence of hydrological droughts at the Łysek station determines the hydrological droughts at the Pakość station.
The strength of the relationship between meteorological droughts and hydrological droughts shows significant variation. This variation is not only the result of the size of the annual sums of precipitation, but also if an increase in air temperature in the analysed area (Figure 2), which leads to an increase in evapotranspiration [92]. Anthropogenic activities related to the operation of a lignite open pit have a significant impact on the analysed area. Some of the water from the mine drainage was directed to the Noteć River above the Noć Kalina station. The amount of water varied in individual years and depended on the location of the exploitation operations. According to Wachowiak [93], in the period of 1995–2009 the Upper Noteć was flooded with some of the mine water from the drainage of the Lubstów open pit. Since 2009, there have been cases of mine water discharge from the Tomisławice open pit via the Pichna River. The correlations between meteorological and hydrological droughts were variable, in some years the strength of the relationship was high (positive correlation), while in other years the relationship was low (negative correlation).
The Pearson correlation analysis shows that there is a relationship between meteorological and hydrological droughts in the study area. However, it should be emphasized that these results should not be directly interpreted. In the correlation analysis, a non-linear relationship can be inadequately described or undetected [94]. Non-linear models (polynomial, exponential and logarithmic) for the relationship between meteorological and hydrological droughts were analysed in the research conducted by Salimi et al. [95].
The research on the correlation between droughts conducted by Tokarczyk and Szalińska [44] for catchments with large areas showed that the largest correlations between SPI and SRI occurred for longer periods of accumulation. Similar relationships between meteorological and hydrological droughts were obtained for other catchments in Poland [43]. In the case of the catchment area of the Upper Noteć River, the relationships between meteorological and hydrological conditions are not natural. The flow regime depends on the amount of water discharged in particular periods, and on the retention capacity of lakes, which is particularly noticeable at the Pakość station. The amount of water accumulated in the Pakość reservoir, through which the Noteć flows, is regulated by a water accumulating weir.

4. Conclusions

The study analysed the trends in meteorological and hydrological drought occurrences in the long-term period of 1981–2016, for the catchment area of the Upper Noteć River. The identification of a meteorological drought was carried out with the use of an SPI, based on monthly precipitation totals from eight meteorological stations. Hydrological drought was determined by means of an SRI for the monthly discharges of the Noteć, which were obtained from three hydrological stations. Non-parametric Mann–Kendall tests and the Sen slope were used to determine trends. The following conclusions might be drawn:
-
Statistically significant trends, at the significance level of 0.05, were identified at three out of eight meteorological stations, based on the Mann–Kendall test and the Sen slope.
-
An increase in meteorological drought occurrences was recorded at the Kłodawa station (downward trend), while a decrease in droughts was recorded at the Sompolno and Kołuda Wielka stations.
-
Hydrological droughts showed an upward trend at the Łysek station, while a decrease in the trend was recorded at the Noć Kalina station, and both were statistically significant. No changes in the trend were found at the Pakość station.
-
The analysis of the correlation between meteorological and hydrological droughts in individual years showed a strong relationship in dry years e.g., 1982 and 1989. The maximum correlation index was 0.94 and was identified over longer accumulation periods i.e., 6 and 9 months.
-
The anthropogenic effects related to the operation of an open cast lignite mine may have had an impact on the relationship between droughts.
The example of the catchment area of the Upper Noteć River indicates that the management of water resources requires the use of at least several indicators that will allow an assessment of the actual state of water reserves. Using the SPI to detect meteorological droughts can be used as a drought warning system [96]. In some cases, the value of the SRI depends on the way water is managed within the catchment area. The size of the runoff may be disturbed by anthropogenic factors. Effective water resource management strategies require constant monitoring of water reserves, which should be consulted among various stakeholder groups related in particular to industry, and agriculture.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.K.-W., A.P. and D.K.; methodology, K.K.-W. and A.P.; software, K.K.-W. and A.P.; validation, K.K.-W. and A.P.; formal analysis, K.K.-W., A.P. and D.K.; resources, K.K.-W. and A.P.; data curation, K.K.-W. and A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, K.K.-W.; writing—review and editing, K.K.-W., A.P. and D.K.; visualization, A.P.; supervision, K.K.-W., A.P. and D.K.; project administration, K.K.-W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nalbantis, I.; Tsakiris, G. Assessment of Hydrological Drought Revisited. Water Resour. Manag. 2009, 23, 881–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, S.-T.; Kuo, C.-C.; Yu, P.-S. Historical trends and variability of meteorological droughts in Taiwan. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2009, 54, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Roodari, A.; Hrachowitz, M.; Hassanpour, F.; Yaghoobzadeh, M. Signatures of human intervention—Or not? Downstream intensification of hydrological drought along a large Central Asian river: The individual roles of climate variability and land use change. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2021, 25, 1943–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bae, H.; Ji, H.; Lim, Y.-J.; Ryu, Y.; Kim, M.-H.; Kim, B.-J. Characteristics of drought propagation in South Korea: Relationship between meteorological, agricultural, and hydrological droughts. Nat. Hazards 2019, 99, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Faridatul, M.; Ahmed, B. Assessing Agricultural Vulnerability to Drought in a Heterogeneous Environment: A Remote Sensing-Based Approach. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dai, A. Drought under global warming: A review. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang. 2011, 2, 45–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Tian, L.; Yuan, S.; Quiring, S. Evaluation of six indices for monitoring agricultural drought in the south-central United States. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2018, 249, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wilhite, D.A.; Glantz, M.H. Understanding: The Drought Phenomenon: The Role of Definitions. Water Int. 1985, 10, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bąk, B.; Kubiak-Wójcicka, K.K. Assessment of meteorological and hydrological drought in Torun (central Poland town) in 1971–2010 based on standardized indicators. In Proceedings of the Water Resources and Wetlands Conference, Tulcea, Romania, 8–10 September 2016; Gastescu, P., Bretcan, P., Eds.; pp. 164–170. Available online: http://www.limnology.ro/wrw2016/proceedings/22_Bak_Kubiak.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2021).
  10. Hasan, H.H.; Razali, S.F.M.; Muhammad, N.S.; Hamzah, F.M. Assessment of probability distributions and analysis of the minimum storage draft rate in the equatorial region. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2021, 21, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, F.; Wu, Y.; Sivakumar, B.; Long, A.; Qiu, L.; Chen, J.; Wang, L.; Liu, S.; Hu, H. Climatic and hydrologic controls on net primary production in a semiarid loess watershed. J. Hydrol. 2018, 568, 803–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, J.; Chen, X.; Love, C.A.; Yao, H.; Chen, X.; AghaKouchak, A. Determination of water required to recover from hydrological drought: Perspective from drought propagation and non-standardized indices. J. Hydrol. 2020, 590, 125227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jehanzaib, M.; Sattar, M.N.; Lee, J.-H.; Kim, T.-W. Investigating effect of climate change on drought propagation from meteorological to hydrological drought using multi-model ensemble projections. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2019, 34, 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gleick, P. Water, Drought, Climate Change, and Conflict in Syria. Weather. Clim. Soc. 2014, 6, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Craft, K.E.; Mahmood, R.; King, S.A.; Goodrich, G.; Yan, J. Twentieth century droughts and agriculture: Examples from impacts on soybean production in Kentucky, USA. Ambio 2015, 44, 557–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Holman, I.; Hess, T.; Rey, D.; Knox, J. A Multi-Level Framework for Adaptation to Drought Within Temperate Agriculture. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Spinoni, J.; Barbosa, P.; Bucchignani, E.; Cassano, J.; Cavazos, T.; Christensen, J.H.; Christensen, O.B.; Coppola, E.; Evans, J.; Geyer, B.; et al. Future Global Meteorological Drought Hot Spots: A Study Based on CORDEX Data. J. Clim. 2020, 33, 3635–3661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. IPCC. Changes in Climate Extremes and Their Impacts on the Natural Physical Environment. In Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Field, C.B., Barros, V., Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Dokken, D.J., Ebi, K.L., Mastrandrea, M.D., Mach, K.J., Plattner, G.-K., Allen, S.K., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  19. Vicente-Serrano, S.M.; Dominguez-Castro, F.; McVicar, T.R.; Tomas-Burguera, M.; Peña-Gallardo, M.; Noguera, I.; López-Moreno, J.I.; Peña, D.; El Kenawy, A. Global characterization of hydrological and meteorological droughts under future climate change: The importance of timescales, vegetation-CO2 feedbacks and changes to distribution functions. Int. J. Clim. 2019, 40, 2557–2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chiang, F.; Mazdiyasni, O.; AghaKouchak, A. Evidence of anthropogenic impacts on global drought frequency, duration, and intensity. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jehanzaib, M.; Kim, T.-W. Exploring the influence of climate change-induced drought propagation on wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 149, 105799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gao, L.; Zhang, Y. Spatio-temporal variation of hydrological drought under climate change during the period 1960–2013 in the Hexi Corridor, China. Arid Land 2016, 82, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Ndehedehe, C.E.; Agutu, N.O.; Ferreira, V.G.; Getirana, A. Evolutionary drought patterns over the Sahel and their teleconnections with low frequency climate oscillations. Atmos. Res. 2019, 233, 104700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Bazrafshan, O.; Zamani, H.; Shekari, M. A copula-based index for drought analysis in arid and semi-arid regions in Iran. Nat. Resour. Model. 2020, 33, e12237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dikici, M. Drought analysis with different indices for the Asi Basin (Turkey). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mahdavi, P.; Kharazi, H.G.; Eslami, H.; Zohrabi, N.; Razaz, M. Drought occurrence under future climate change scenarios in the Zard River basin, Iran. Water Supply 2020, 21, 899–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Buras, A.; Rammig, A.; Zang, C.S. Quantifying impacts of the 2018 drought on European ecosystems in comparison to 2003. Biogeosciences 2020, 17, 1655–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kubiak-Wójcicka, K.; Nagy, P.; Zeleňáková, M.; Hlavatá, H.; Abd-Elhamid, H. Identification of Extreme Weather Events Using Meteorological and Hydrological Indicators in the Laborec River Catchment, Slovakia. Water 2021, 13, 1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Emadodin, I.; Corral, D.; Reinsch, T.; Kluß, C.; Taube, F. Climate Change Effects on Temperate Grassland and Its Implication for Forage Production: A Case Study from Northern Germany. Agriculture 2021, 11, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Koffi, B.; Kouadio, Z.A.; Kouassi, K.H.; Yao, A.B.; Sanchez, M. Impact of Meteorological Drought on Streamflows in the Lobo River Catchment at Nibéhibé, Côte d’Ivoire. J. Water Resour. Prot. 2020, 12, 495–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Awange, J.L.; Mpelasoka, F.; Goncalves, R. When every drop counts: Analysis of Droughts in Brazil for the 1901-2013 period. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 566–567, 1472–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Hari, V.; Rakovec, O.; Markonis, Y.; Hanel, M.; Kumar, R. Increased future occurrences of the exceptional 2018–2019 Central European drought under global warming. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kubiak-Wójcicka, K. Assessment of water resources in Poland. In Quality in Water Resources in Poland; Zeleňáková, M., Kubiak-Wójcicka, K., Negm, A.M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 15–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Somorowska, U. Changes in Drought Conditions in Poland over the Past 60 Years Evaluated by the Standardized Precipitation-Evapotranspiration Index. Acta Geophys. 2016, 64, 2530–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Szwed, M. Variability of precipitation in Poland under climate change. Theor. Appl. Clim. 2018, 135, 1003–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kubiak-Wójcicka, K. Dynamics of meteorological and hydrological droughts in the agricultural catchments. Res. Rural Dev. 2019, 1, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tomczyk, A.M.; Szyga-Pluta, K. Variability of thermal and precipitation conditions in the growing season in Poland in the years 1966–2015. Theor. Appl. Clim. 2018, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Osuch, M.; Romanowicz, R.J.; Booij, M.J. The influence of parametric uncertainty on the relationships between HBV model parameters and climatic characteristics. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2015, 60, 1299–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Łabędzki, L.; Bak, B. Indicator-based monitoring and forecasting water deficit and surplus in agriculture in Poland. Ann. Wars. Univ. Life Sci. SGGW Land Reclam. 2015, 47, 355–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kuśmierek-Tomaszewska, R.; Żarski, J.; Dudek, S. Assessment of Irrigation Needs in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in Temperate Climate of Kujawsko-Pomorskie Region (Poland). Agronomy 2019, 9, 814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Łabedzki, L. Estimation of local drought frequency in central Poland using the standardized precipitation index SPI. Irrig. Drain. 2007, 56, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tokarczyk, T.; Szalińska, W. Combined analysis of precipitation and water deficit for drought hazard assessment. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2014, 59, 1675–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Kubiak-Wójcicka, K.; Bąk, B. Monitoring of meteorological and hydrological droughts in the Vistula basin (Poland). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018, 190, 691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Tokarczyk, T.; Szalińska, W.; National Research Institute. Drought Hazard Assessment in the Process of Drought Risk Management. Acta Sci. Pol. Form. Circumiectus 2018, 3, 217–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Łabędzki, L.; Bąk, B. Impact of meteorological drought on crop water deficit and crop yield reduction in Polish agriculture. J. Water Land Dev. 2017, 34, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kubiak-Wójcicka, K.; Juśkiewicz, W. Relationships between meteorological and hydrological drought in a young-glacial zone (north-western Poland) based on Standardised Precipitation Index (SPI) and Standardized Runoff Index (SRI). Acta Montan. Slovaca 2020, 25, 517–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bąk, B.; Kubiak-Wójcicka, K. Impact of meteorological drought on hydrological drought in Toruń (central Poland) in the period of 1971–2015. J. Water Land Dev. 2017, 32, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Radzka, E. The assessment of atmospheric drought during vegetation season (according to Standardized Precipitation Index SPI) in central-eastern Poland. J. Ecol. Eng. 2015, 16, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Grzywna, A.; Bochniak, A.; Ziernicka-Wojtaszek, A.; Krużel, J.; Jóźwiakowski, K.; Wałega, A.; Cupak, A.; Mazur, A.; Obroślak, R.; Serafin, A. The analysis of spatial variability of precipitation in Poland in the multiyears 1981–2010. J. Water Land Dev. 2020, 46, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bąk, B. Warunki klimatyczne Wielkopolski i Kujaw. Woda-Środowisko-Obszary Wiejskie 2003, 3, 11–39. [Google Scholar]
  51. Natural Earth. Free Vector and Raster Map Data @ naturalearthdata.com. Available online: https://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/10m-cultural-vectors and https://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/10m-raster-data/10m-natural-earth-1 (accessed on 12 July 2021).
  52. Wektorowe Warstwy Tematyczne aPGW. Available online: https://dane.gov.pl/pl/dataset/599/resource/672,wektorowe-warstwy-tematyczne-apgw/table (accessed on 12 July 2021).
  53. SRTM 1 Arc-Second Global. Available online: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ (accessed on 3 June 2021). [CrossRef]
  54. Baza Danych Obiektów Ogólnogeograficznych. Available online: https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?locale=pl&gui=new&sessionID=5160004 (accessed on 15 July 2021).
  55. Hydro IMGW-PIB. Available online: https://hydro.imgw.pl/#map/19.5,51.5,7,true,true,0 (accessed on 15 July 2021).
  56. QGIS Quick Map Services Plugin. OSM Standard. Plugin Was Used on 13–15 July 2021. Author of the Plugin: NextGIS. Base Map from: OpenStreetMap and OpenStreetMap Foundation. Detailed Information about Copyright and License of the OpenStreetMap. Available online: https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright (accessed on 15 July 2021).
  57. Przybyłek, J. Aktualne problemy odwadniania złóż węgla brunatnego w Wielkopolsce. Górnictwo Odkrywkowe 2018, 59, 5–14. [Google Scholar]
  58. Kubiak-Wójcicka, K.; Machula, S. Influence of Climate Changes on the State of Water Resources in Poland and Their Usage. Geosciences 2020, 10, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tomaszewski, E.; Kubiak-Wójcicka, K. Low-flows in Polish rivers. In Management of Water Resources in Poland; Zeleňáková, M., Kubiak-Wójcicka, K., Negm, A.M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 205–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. McKee, T.B.; Doesken, N.J.; Kleist, J. The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference of Applied Climatology, Anaheim, CA, USA, 17–22 January 1993; pp. 179–184. [Google Scholar]
  61. World Meteorological Organization (WMO); Global Water Partnership (GWP). Handbook of Drought Indicators and Indices; Integrated Drought Management Tools and Guidelines Series 2; Svoboda, M., Fuchs, B.A., Eds.; Integrated Drought Management Programme (IDMP): Geneva, Switzerland, 2016; ISBN 978-92-63-11173-9. [Google Scholar]
  62. Guttman, N.B. Accepting the Standardized Precipitation Index: A calculation algorithm. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1999, 35, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lloyd-Hughes, B.; Saunders, M. A drought climatology for Europe. Int. J. Clim. 2002, 22, 1571–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fang, W.; Huang, S.; Huang, Q.; Huang, G.; Wang, H.; Leng, G.; Wang, L. Identifying drought propagation by simultaneously considering linear and nonlinear dependence in the Wei River basin of the Loess Plateau, China. J. Hydrol. 2020, 591, 125287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Łabędzki, L. Actions and measures for mitigation drought and water scarcity in agriculture. J. Water Land Dev. 2016, 29, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Lorenzo-Lacruz, J.; Morán-Tejeda, E.; Vicente-Serrano, S.M.; López-Moreno, J.I. Streamflow droughts in the Iberian Peninsula between 1945 and 2005: Spatial and temporal patterns. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 17, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Sahoo, R.N.; Dipanwita, D.; Khanna, M.; Kumar, N.; Bandyopadhyay, S.K. Drought assessment in the Dhar and Mewat Districs of India using meteorological and remote-sensing derived indices. Nat. Hazards 2015, 77, 733–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shukla, S.; Wood, A. Use of a standardized runoff index for characterizing hydrologic drought. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2008, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Bayissa, Y.; Maskey, S.; Tadesse, T.; Van Andel, S.J.; Moges, S.; Van Griensven, A.; Solomatine, D. Comparison of the Performance of Six Drought Indices in Characterizing Historical Drought for the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Geosciences 2018, 8, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Vicente-Serrano, S.M.; Lopez-Moreno, I.; Beguería, S.; Lorenzo-Lacruz, J.; Azorin-Molina, C.; Morán-Tejeda, E. Accurate Computation of a Streamflow Drought Index. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2012, 17, 318–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Mann, H.B. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 1945, 13, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kendall, M.G. Rank Correlation Methods; Charles Grin: London, UK, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  73. Silva, A.; Filho, M.; Menezes, R.; Stosic, T.; Stosic, B. Trends and Persistence of Dry–Wet Conditions in Northeast Brazil. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Bacanli, G. Trend analysis of precipitation and drought in the Aegean region, Turkey. Meteorol. Appl. 2017, 24, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hu, M.; Dong, M.; Tian, X.; Wang, L.; Jiang, Y. Trends in Different Grades of Precipitation over the Yangtze River Basin from 1960 to 2017. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gocic, M.; Trajkovic, S. Analysis of changes in meteorological variables using Mann-Kendall and Sen’s slope estimator statistical tests in Serbia. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2013, 100, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tuan, N.H.; Canh, T.T. Analysis of Trends in Drought with the Non-Parametric Approach in Vietnam: A Case Study in Ninh Thuan Province. Am. J. Clim. Chang. 2021, 10, 51–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kuriqi, A.; Ali, R.; Quoc Bao, P.; Gambini, J.M.; Gupta, V.; Malik, A.; Nguyen Thi Thuy, L.; Joshi, Y.; Duong Tran, A.; Van Thai, N.; et al. Seasonality shift and streamflow flow variability trends in central India. Acta Geophys. 2020, 68, 1461–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Abeysingha, N.S.; Rajapaksha, U.R.L.N. SPI-Based Spatiotemporal Drought over Sri Lanka. Hindawi Adv. Meteorol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Sen, P.K. Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1968, 63, 1379–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Achite, M.; Krakauer, N.; Wałęga, A.; Caloiero, T. Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Dry and Wet Spells in the Wadi Cheliff Basin, Algeria. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R; RStudio PBC: Boston, MA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  83. Wickham, H.; Bryan, J. Readxl: Read Excel Files. R Package Version 1.3.1. 2019. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readxl (accessed on 17 July 2021).
  84. Pohlert, T. Trend: Non-Parametric Trend Tests and Change-Point Detection. R package Version 1.1.4. 2020. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=trend (accessed on 17 July 2021).
  85. Reference Manual. Package “Trend”. Non-Parametric Trend Tests and Change-Point Detection. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/trend/trend.pdf (accessed on 8 August 2021).
  86. Portela, M.M.; Espinosa, L.A.; Zelenakova, M. Long-Term Rainfall Trends and Their Variability in Mainland Portugal in the Last 106 Years. Climate 2020, 8, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ionita, M.; Tallaksen, L.M.; Kingston, D.G.; Stagge, J.H.; Laaha, G.; Van Lanen, H.A.J.; Chelcea, S.M.; Haslinger, K. The European 2015 drought from a climatological perspective. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hanel, M.; Rakovec, O.; Markonis, Y.; Maca, P.; Samaniego, L.; Kyselý, J.; Kumar, R. Revisiting the recent European droughts from a long-term perspective. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pińskwar, I.; Choryński, A.; Kundzewicz, Z.W. Severe Drought in the Spring of 2020 in Poland—More of the Same? Agronomy 2020, 10, 1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Barker, L.J.; Hannaford, J.; Parry, S.; Katie, A.; Smith, K.A.; Tanguy, M.; Prudhomme, C. Historic hydrological droughts 1891–2015: Systematic characterisation for a diverse set of catchments across the UK. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Solarczyk, A.; Kubiak-Wójcicka, K. The exhaustion of water resources in the Kuyavian-Pomeranian voivodship in drought condition in 2015. Res. Rural Dev. Water Manag. 2019, 1, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ziernicka-Wojtaszek, A.; Kopcińska, J. Variation in Atmospheric Precipitation in Poland in the Years 2001–2018. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wachowiak, G. Wpływ zrzutów wód kopalnianych na wielkość przepływów wody w rzekach w początkowym okresie odwadniania odkrywki “Tomisławice” KWB “Konin”. Górnictwo i Geoinżynieria 2011, 35, 153–166. [Google Scholar]
  94. Bewick, V.; Cheek, L.; Ball, J. Statistics review 7: Correlation and regression. Crit. Care 2003, 7, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Salimi, H.; Asadi, E.; Darbandi, S. Meteorological and hydrological drought monitoring using several drought indices. Appl. Water Sci. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. El-Afandi, G.; Morsy, M.; Kamel, A. Estimation of Drought Index over the Northern Coast of Egypt. IJSRSET 2016, 2, 335–344. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Study area. Source: (a) own elaboration made with [51,52]. Map elaborated in the coordinate system: WGS 84/UTM zone 34N; (b) own elaboration made with [52,53,54], location of the stations based on [55,56] and Table 1, location of the lignite open pits based on [56,57]. Meteorological station Izbica Kujawska is out of catchment area according to coordinates from Table 1. Location of the hydrological station Pakość is determined by cartographic issues. Map elaborated in the coordinate system: WGS 84/UTM zone 34N.
Figure 1. Study area. Source: (a) own elaboration made with [51,52]. Map elaborated in the coordinate system: WGS 84/UTM zone 34N; (b) own elaboration made with [52,53,54], location of the stations based on [55,56] and Table 1, location of the lignite open pits based on [56,57]. Meteorological station Izbica Kujawska is out of catchment area according to coordinates from Table 1. Location of the hydrological station Pakość is determined by cartographic issues. Map elaborated in the coordinate system: WGS 84/UTM zone 34N.
Atmosphere 12 01098 g001
Figure 2. Average annual air temperature and average precipitation sums at the Kołuda Wielka meteorological station in the period of 1980–2016.
Figure 2. Average annual air temperature and average precipitation sums at the Kołuda Wielka meteorological station in the period of 1980–2016.
Atmosphere 12 01098 g002
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of the number of months with SPI ≤ −1.0 in the period of 1981–2016. Source: (ae) own elaboration made with [52], Table 4, Tables 6 and 7. Location of the stations based on [55,56] and Table 1. Meteorological station Izbica Kujawska is out of catchment area according to coordinates from Table 1. Location of the hydrological station Pakość is determined by cartographic issues. Maps elaborated in the coordinate system: WGS 84/UTM zone 34N.
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of the number of months with SPI ≤ −1.0 in the period of 1981–2016. Source: (ae) own elaboration made with [52], Table 4, Tables 6 and 7. Location of the stations based on [55,56] and Table 1. Meteorological station Izbica Kujawska is out of catchment area according to coordinates from Table 1. Location of the hydrological station Pakość is determined by cartographic issues. Maps elaborated in the coordinate system: WGS 84/UTM zone 34N.
Atmosphere 12 01098 g003
Figure 4. The development of meteorological and hydrological droughts in the period of 1981–2016 for different accumulation periods (n = 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12), SPI—average values from 8 stations, SRI for Pakość.
Figure 4. The development of meteorological and hydrological droughts in the period of 1981–2016 for different accumulation periods (n = 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12), SPI—average values from 8 stations, SRI for Pakość.
Atmosphere 12 01098 g004aAtmosphere 12 01098 g004b
Figure 5. Correlation coefficient r between average SPI and SRI in Pakość for different periods of accumulation in the period of 1981–2016 (n—number of accumulated months).
Figure 5. Correlation coefficient r between average SPI and SRI in Pakość for different periods of accumulation in the period of 1981–2016 (n—number of accumulated months).
Atmosphere 12 01098 g005aAtmosphere 12 01098 g005b
Table 1. Annual sum of atmospheric precipitation in the period of 1980–2016.
Table 1. Annual sum of atmospheric precipitation in the period of 1980–2016.
Meteorological StationAltitude
(m a.s.l.)
LatitudeLongitudeTotal Precipitation during the Year (mm)
AverageMaximum/YearMinimum/Year
Izbica Kujawska12052°26′ N18°46′ E529.3817.6/2010309.6/2011
Pakość7552°48′ N18°05′ E513.5704.1/2010291.4/1989
Kołuda Wielka8552°44′ N18°09′ E500.1810.7/1980212.5/1989
Strzelno10552°38′ N18°11′ E542.5816.9/1980246.6/1989
Sompolno9652°23′ N18°31′ E516.0847.6/2010302.7/1989
Gniezno12452°33′ N17°34′ E506.6708.5/2010282.2/1982
Janowiec Wielkopolski9552°46′ N17°29′ E519.6760.2/2010275.5/1982
Kłodawa12052°15′ N18°55′ E531.2763.2/2001306.4/1989
Table 2. Hydrological characteristics of the Noteć River in the period of 1980–2016—annual discharge.
Table 2. Hydrological characteristics of the Noteć River in the period of 1980–2016—annual discharge.
Hydrological StationThe Catchment Area (km2)Average Multi-Year Discharge (m3·s−1)Maximum
Discharge
(m3·s−1)
Minimum
Discharge
(m3·s−1)
Łysek303.320.7410.70.001
Noć Kalina426.111.4716.70.05
Pakość2301.985.0869.30.53
Table 3. The classification scale for SPI and SRI values.
Table 3. The classification scale for SPI and SRI values.
SPI, SRI ValueCategory
SPI/SRI ≥ 2.0Extremely wet
2.0 > SPI/SRI ≥ 1.5Severely wet
1.5 > SPI/SRI ≥ 1.0Moderately wet
1.0 > SPI/SRI > −1.0Normal
−1.0 ≥ SPI/SRI > −1.5Moderately dry
−1.5 ≥ SPI/SRI > −2.0Severely dry
SPI/SRI ≤ −2.0Extremely dry
Table 4. Meteorological drought parameters (SPI) in different time scales in the period of 1981–2016.
Table 4. Meteorological drought parameters (SPI) in different time scales in the period of 1981–2016.
Parameters of DroughtsSPI−1SPI−3SPI−6SPI−9SPI−12
Izbica Kujawska
Number of months with SPI ≤ −1.06773755959
Number of months with SPI ≥ 1.05868686365
Minimum value of the index−3.00−2.81−2.30−2.93−2.53
Maximum value of the index3.592.832.532.472.33
Sompolno
Number of months with SPI ≤ −1.06671726863
Number of months with SPI ≥ 1.06157666766
Minimum value of the index−3.50−2.61−2.70−2.55−2.57
Maximum value of the index3.252.672.652.932.77
Strzelno
Number of months with SPI ≤ −1.06268606456
Number of months with SPI ≥ 1.07067666968
Minimum value of the index−3.27−3.01−3.09−3.13−2.99
Maximum value of the index3.372.942.392.902.28
Kołuda Wielka
Number of months with SPI ≤ −1.06266666249
Number of months with SPI ≥ 1.06568725555
Minimum value of the index−3.43−2.71−3.32−3.47−3.38
Maximum value of the index3.162.902.372.752.62
Pakość
Number of months with SPI ≤ −1.07069717471
Number of months with SPI ≥ 1.06670696972
Minimum value of the index−3.54−2.83−2.80−2.67−2.69
Maximum value of the index2.802.642.352.902.12
Gniezno
Number of months with SPI ≤ −1.07070687279
Number of months with SPI ≥ 1.06465676761
Minimum value of the index−3.43−2.95−2.73−2.73−2.66
Maximum value of the index2.502.372.452.702.10
Janowiec Wielkopolski
Number of months with SPI ≤ −1.07167727071
Number of months with SPI ≥ 1.06662666568
Minimum value of the index−3.22−2.83−2.70−2.79−2.72
Maximum value of the index2.732.262.352.092.07
Kłodawa
Number of months with SPI ≤ −1.07381666561
Number of months with SPI ≥ 1.05272746869
Minimum value of the index−3.09−2.92−2.60−2.72−2.46
Maximum value of the index3.262.262.352.582.35
Table 5. The Parameters of a hydrological drought (SRI) in different time scales in the period of 1981–2016.
Table 5. The Parameters of a hydrological drought (SRI) in different time scales in the period of 1981–2016.
Parameters of DroughtsSRI−1SRI−3SRI−6SRI−9SRI−12
Pakość
Number of months with SPI ≤ −1.07577778179
Number of months with SPI ≥ 1.06867737576
Minimum value of the index−2.33−2.20−2.20−1.93−1.71
Maximum value of the index2.342.302.833.052.71
Noć Kalina
Number of months with SPI ≤ −1.077838610199
Number of months with SPI ≥ 1.07276675859
Minimum value of the index−3.16−3.10−2.79−2.23−2.25
Maximum value of the index2.492.311.972.051.92
Łysek
Number of months with SPI ≤ −1.02928283036
Number of months with SPI ≥ 1.02631313240
Minimum value of the index−5.22−5.18−5.09−4.96−4.77
Maximum value of the index1.521.641.402.001.77
Table 6. Results of trend analysis SPI in different time scales in the period of 1981–2016 at meteorological stations.
Table 6. Results of trend analysis SPI in different time scales in the period of 1981–2016 at meteorological stations.
StationsParametersSPI
SPI−1SPI−3SPI−6SPI−9SPI−12
KłodawaZ−1.817−2.429−3.179−3.755−4.318
S−5.45 × 103−7.28 × 103−9.53 × 103−1.12 × 104−1.29 × 104
var_S8.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 106
p-value0.06920.01510.00150.00021.58 × 10−5
Sen’s slope−0.0007−0.0010−0.0013−0.0016−0.0018
NDDDD
Izbica KujawskaZ−0.4340.1250.2510.033−0.451
S−1.30 × 1033.76 × 1027.54 × 1029.90 × 101−1.35 × 103
var_S8.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 106
p-value0.66460.90050.80170.97390.6523
Sen’s slope−0.00025.4386 × 10−50.00011.50 × 10−5−0.0002
NNNNN
SompolnoZ1.2532.1802.4132.0901.648
S3.76 × 1036.54 × 1037.24 × 1036.27 × 1034.94 × 103
var_S8.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 106
p-value0.21020.02930.01580.03660.0994
Sen’s slope0.00050.00090.00100.00090.0007
NIIIN
StrzelnoZ1.2231.7282.0341.3410.908
S3.67 × 1035.18 × 1036.10 × 1034.02 × 1032.72 × 103
var_S8.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 106
p-value0.22140.08400.04120.18010.3641
Sen’s slope0.00050.00070.00080.00060.0004
NNINN
GnieznoZ0.4531.2721.9161.7901.506
S1.36 × 1033.81 × 1035.75 × 1035.37 × 1034.52 × 103
var_S8.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 106
p-value0.65030.20350.05530.07340.1322
Sen’s slope0.00020.00050.00080.00070.0006
NNNNN
Janowiec Wlkp.Z−0.109−0.100−0.048−0.683−0.931
S−3.27 × 102−3.01 × 102−1.45 × 102−2.05 × 103−2.79 × 103
var_S8.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 106
p-value0.91340.92030.96170.49460.3517
Sen’s slope−4.40 × 10−5−3.78 × 10−5−1.81 × 10−5−0.0003−0.0004
NNNNN
Kołuda WielkaZ1.7003.2514.1785.0844.336
S5.10 × 1039.75 × 1031.25 × 1041.52 × 1041.30 × 104
var_S8.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 106
p-value0.089180.00122.95 × 10−53.69 × 10−71.45 × 10−5
Sen’s slope0.00070.00130.00160.00190.0016
NIIII
PakośćZ0.1750.8341.2070.8440.284
S5.27 × 1022.50 × 1033.62 × 1032.53 × 1038.51 × 102
var_S8.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 106
p-value0.86070.40440.22740.39860.7768
Sen’s slope7.48 × 10−50.00030.00050.00030.0001
NNNNN
Description: N—no significant trend, D—significant decreasing trend, I—significant increasing trend.
Table 7. Results of trend analysis SRI in different time scales in the period of 1981–2016 at hydrological stations.
Table 7. Results of trend analysis SRI in different time scales in the period of 1981–2016 at hydrological stations.
StationsParametersSRI
SRI−1SRI−3SRI−6SRI−9SRI−12
ŁysekZ−5.342−5.4125.692−5.974−6.2735
S−1.60 × 104−1.62 × 104−1.71 × 104−1.79 × 104−1.88 × 104
var_S8.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 106
p-value9.19 × 10−85.97 × 10−81.25 × 10−82.32 × 10−93.53 × 10−10
Sen’s slope−0.0013−0.0014−0.0015−0.0017−0.0019
DDDDD
Noć KalinaZ4.0763.7983.0322.4442.214
S1.22 × 1041.14 × 1049.09 × 1037.33 × 1036.64 × 103
var_S8.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 106
p-value4.58 × 10−50.000140.00240.01450.0268
Sen’s slope0.00170.00160.00130.00100.0008
IIIII
PakośćZ−0.784−1.032−1.134−1.428−1.488
S−2.35 × 103−3.10 × 103−3.40 × 103−4.28 × 103−4.46 × 103
var_S8.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 1068.99 × 106
p-value0.4330.30190.25660.15330.1368
Sen’s slope−0.0003−0.0004−0.0005−0.0006−0.0007
NNNNN
Description: N—no significant trend, D—significant decreasing trend, I—significant increasing trend.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kubiak-Wójcicka, K.; Pilarska, A.; Kamiński, D. The Analysis of Long-Term Trends in the Meteorological and Hydrological Drought Occurrences Using Non-Parametric Methods—Case Study of the Catchment of the Upper Noteć River (Central Poland). Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12091098

AMA Style

Kubiak-Wójcicka K, Pilarska A, Kamiński D. The Analysis of Long-Term Trends in the Meteorological and Hydrological Drought Occurrences Using Non-Parametric Methods—Case Study of the Catchment of the Upper Noteć River (Central Poland). Atmosphere. 2021; 12(9):1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12091098

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kubiak-Wójcicka, Katarzyna, Agnieszka Pilarska, and Dariusz Kamiński. 2021. "The Analysis of Long-Term Trends in the Meteorological and Hydrological Drought Occurrences Using Non-Parametric Methods—Case Study of the Catchment of the Upper Noteć River (Central Poland)" Atmosphere 12, no. 9: 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12091098

APA Style

Kubiak-Wójcicka, K., Pilarska, A., & Kamiński, D. (2021). The Analysis of Long-Term Trends in the Meteorological and Hydrological Drought Occurrences Using Non-Parametric Methods—Case Study of the Catchment of the Upper Noteć River (Central Poland). Atmosphere, 12(9), 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12091098

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop