Next Article in Journal
Theoretical Chemistry of Atmospheric Processes
Next Article in Special Issue
First Long-Time Airborne Fungal Spores Study in Dublin, Ireland (1978–1980)
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Study on Microclimate and Outdoor Thermal Comfort of Street Canyon Typology in Extremely Hot Weather—A Case Study of Busan, South Korea
Previous Article in Special Issue
Blowin’ in the Wind: Wind Dispersal Ability of Phytopathogenic Fusarium in a Wind Tunnel Experiment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Airborne Fungal Spore Review, New Advances and Automatisation

by
Moises Martinez-Bracero
1,*,
Emma Markey
1,
Jerry Hourihane Clancy
1,
Eoin J. McGillicuddy
1,
Gavin Sewell
1 and
David J. O’Connor
2
1
School of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Technological University Dublin, D07 H6K8 Dublin, Ireland
2
School of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, D09 E432 Dublin, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2022, 13(2), 308; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020308
Submission received: 14 December 2021 / Revised: 28 January 2022 / Accepted: 29 January 2022 / Published: 11 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Airborne Fungal and Pteridophyte Spores)

Abstract

Fungal spores make up a significant portion of Primary Biological Aerosol Particles (PBAPs) with large quantities of such particles noted in the air. Fungal particles are of interest because of their potential to affect the health of both plants and humans. They are omnipresent in the atmosphere year-round, with concentrations varying due to meteorological parameters and location. Equally, differences between indoor and outdoor fungal spore concentrations and dispersal play an important role in occupational health. This review attempts to summarise the different spore sampling methods, identify the most important spore types in terms of negative effects on crops and the public, the factors affecting their growth/dispersal, and different methods of predicting fungal spore concentrations currently in use.
Keywords: fungal spores; review; automatic; PBAP; bioaerosol sampling; modelling fungal spores; review; automatic; PBAP; bioaerosol sampling; modelling

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martinez-Bracero, M.; Markey, E.; Clancy, J.H.; McGillicuddy, E.J.; Sewell, G.; O’Connor, D.J. Airborne Fungal Spore Review, New Advances and Automatisation. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020308

AMA Style

Martinez-Bracero M, Markey E, Clancy JH, McGillicuddy EJ, Sewell G, O’Connor DJ. Airborne Fungal Spore Review, New Advances and Automatisation. Atmosphere. 2022; 13(2):308. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020308

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martinez-Bracero, Moises, Emma Markey, Jerry Hourihane Clancy, Eoin J. McGillicuddy, Gavin Sewell, and David J. O’Connor. 2022. "Airborne Fungal Spore Review, New Advances and Automatisation" Atmosphere 13, no. 2: 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020308

APA Style

Martinez-Bracero, M., Markey, E., Clancy, J. H., McGillicuddy, E. J., Sewell, G., & O’Connor, D. J. (2022). Airborne Fungal Spore Review, New Advances and Automatisation. Atmosphere, 13(2), 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020308

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop