Next Article in Journal
Temporal and Spatial Pattern of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Gansu Province and Its Environmental Factors Detection and Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Sea Surface Temperature on City Temperature near Warm and Cold Ocean Currents in Summer Season for Northern Hemisphere
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

Why the Real Atmosphere Has More Energy than Climate Models: Implications for Ground-Based Telescopes

Independent Researcher, Boulder, CO 80303, USA
Atmosphere 2025, 16(1), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16010056
Submission received: 5 December 2024 / Revised: 29 December 2024 / Accepted: 5 January 2025 / Published: 8 January 2025

Abstract

:
The calculation of Gibbs free energy via the statistical multifractal analysis of airborne observations indicates that the atmosphere is not at local thermodynamic equilibrium. Both climate models and meteorological analyses assume that it is. Satellite retrievals use spectroscopic data taken at equilibrium in laboratories, leading to apparent consistency that is to some degree faulty. Line shapes of radiatively active species, the rotational energy of molecular nitrogen and oxygen, and the translational energy of all molecules are involved, resulting in less energy in models than exists in the real atmosphere. The resulting formulation of turbulence is from the smallest scales up and has implications for astronomical observation by adaptive optics. Kolmogorov (isotropy) is not evident. The effect of temperature on the overhead water vapour column at ground-based telescopes is also open to the effects of climate change. The degree to which the dynamic operational temperature differs from that obtained by the use of local thermodynamic equilibrium assumptions needs to be established by observational measurements. Some of the considerations will apply to the atmospheres of exoplanets with regard to photochemistry and signatures of life.

1. Introduction

Atmospheric chemistry in Earth’s atmosphere is driven by the absorption of solar photons by some of the constituent molecules, most notably molecular oxygen. This process, called photodissociation, results in the production of photofragments—oxygen atoms, in the case of molecular oxygen. Depending upon the photon energy and the quantum levels of the parent molecules and their photofragments, the photofragments will have excitation energies above their ground state, which may be translational and electronic in all cases, plus rotational and vibrational in the case of molecules [1]. Although the assumption that excited photofragments are instantaneously thermalized is widely employed in numerical models of the atmosphere, the issue has been raised in, for example, Faraday Discussions meetings [2,3]. Initially, the fate of photofragments was raised in the context of modelled OH production in the troposphere [4,5] and of the shortfall of ozone production in the stratosphere [6]. However, evidence has emerged that photofragments have agency in affecting the determination of the intermittency of temperature via the initiation of turbulence on molecular scales followed by upscale propagation [7,8]. These later results were obtained using the methods of statistical multifractality [9]. Atmospheric turbulence is involved in the operation of ground-based astronomical telescopes via adaptive optics [10]. The fluctuations in density caused by turbulence result in fluctuations in optical refractive index, blurring the images of stars and galaxies in ground-based telescopes. It is not known with certainty how turbulence and the intermittency of temperature will vary with climate change, but there is evidence that it will at jet stream altitudes [11].
Statistical multifractality is summarized in Table 1.
More details about how these variables are obtained can be found in [1]. Briefly, q is the qth-order structure function of the observed variable. The scaling exponent K(q) is derived from the slope of a log–log plot [1]. Equation (1) expresses the relation of the Hurst exponent H to the Gibbs free energy equivalent.
H = H ( q ) + K ( q ) / q
The examination of energy E in terms of a scale ratio produces an expression for the fractal co-dimension c(γ). C1 is the co-dimension of the mean, characterizing the intensity of the intermittency. The Lévy exponent α characterizes the generator of the intermittency (see [1]). We will examine the intermittency of temperature and its correlation with the ozone photodissociation rate and with temperature itself in the lower stratosphere.
A second factor affecting ground-based astronomical telescopes is the water vapour content of the overlying atmosphere, a variable that is known to increase as the surface temperature of the oceans increases. This will particularly affect telescopes operating at infrared, millimetre-wave and microwave wavelengths, where water vapour has rich rotational and vibrational spectra. There is pronounced hemispheric asymmetry in the water vapour content of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, with the Southern Hemisphere showing the drying effects of the Antarctic ice dome [12,13,14]. The effects on radiative transfer and the resulting temperature influence have been modelled. There is clear evidence that meteorological analyses fail to reproduce the diurnal temperature variation in the upper stratosphere and also show a cold bias [15], which will be discussed briefly in Section 4.
Significant effort has been made to detect atmospheric signs of life on exoplanets, even of intelligent and technological presence. Getting the spectroscopic interference from Earth’s spectra correct is an important consideration in this context, as are the characteristics of our terrestrial atmosphere in relation to the chemistry of life and its evolution from a prebiotic state

2. Materials and Methods

The observational data used in this paper were taken during a variety of airborne missions. They are cited in references [1,7,8,16,17], and the figures will be referred to as the figure number in the appropriate reference. There is one exception: the concept upon which this paper is based appears here as Figure 1. It is Figure 3 in [1]; an earlier version appeared as Figure 19 in [17].
The airborne observations analysed here were taken between 1987 and 2006 from the NASA ER-2, DC-8 and WB57F aircraft, using meteorological measurements [18], the ozone [19], an ozone photodissociation radiometer [20], total water measurements [21], and the NOAA Gulfstream 4-SP using GPS dropsondes [22]. The space and time coverage can be found in [23,24] and in the following Special Issues: J. Geophys. Res. D 1989, 94(D9, D14); Geophys. Res. Lett. 1990, 17(4); J. Geophys. Res. D 1992, 97(D8); J. Geophys. Res. D 1997, 102(D3); J. Geophys. Res. D 1999, 104, 481–495; and J. Geophys. Res. D 2002, 107, 8259.

3. Results

Results will be called up by reference; within the references, figures will be indicated by the number they have in the particular reference. The exception is Figure 1 above, included to illustrate the phenomenon we are discussing.

3.1. Turbulent Effects

The observation of non-classical turbulent exponents in airborne observations was reported as soon as statistical multifractal analysis was applied. The conclusion was that the atmosphere exhibited 23/9 multifractal dimensionality [8]. Application to the dropsonde observations resulted in the conclusion that isotropic, Kolmogorov exponents were never observed, with the exponent expressing the scaling of the vertical shear of the horizontal wind increasing as height increased from the ocean surface to 13 km altitude [22], and so resolving the question posed in [9] as regards the adaptive optics procedure for ground-based astronomical interferometers for astronomy. Figure 12 in [22] displays the result. Note that the aircraft observations extend from pole to pole [17]. The molecular origins of turbulence imply translational and rotational energy distributions in the major constituents N2 and O2 that are not Maxwell–Boltzmann populations [7]. Temperature in real air is thus not defined by the black curves in Figure 1, but is characterized by a curve resembling the hypothesized red one. The exponent characterizing temperature intermittency is less at night than during daylight hours but does not go to zero in the absence of solar radiation.

3.2. Radiative Effects

Radiative effects upon astronomical observations can arise in two further ways: the effect of molecular-driven turbulence upon spectroscopic line shapes [16,17] and the characterization of the atmospheric spectrum, particularly that of water vapour and its hydrogen-bonded dimer [25]. The population of the dimer and higher oligomers will depend nonlinearly upon temperature. Water vapour has a rich rovibrational spectrum from the near infrared to the microwave; it is an astronomical observable of interest too.
Airborne observations showed that a downward-looking high-resolution interferometer showed a temperature structure below the ER-2 over Antarctica that was more pronounced than that calculated by meteorological assimilation. Sensitivity to skin temperature and cloud cover was evident, factors that will respond to climatic heating.

3.3. Water Vapour Effects

Water vapour shows asymmetries between the Northern and Southern Hemispheres [12,13,14]. The drying effects of the Antarctic ice dome extend to the Southern Hemisphere mid-latitudes in the troposphere, as well as the stratosphere [13,14]. This implies that lower stratospheric and upper tropospheric air in the mid-latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere is not exclusively dried in the tropics at the “cold trap” but is significantly affected by the presence of Antarctica. The siting of ground-based telescopes in the montane upper troposphere of the Atacama Desert reflects this fact. It is a factor likely to be sensitive to sea surface temperatures via the Clapeyron–Clausius equation, as well as to the effect of melting sea ice and glaciers. Warmer sea surface temperatures globally are likely to increase the water vapour content in the air column above ground-based telescopes. In turn, this will make it more difficult to detect and analyse water vapour spectra from exoplanets.

4. Discussion

The argument that real air contains more energy than that simulated by numerical models that assume local thermodynamic equilibrium rests on results obtained by the statistical multifractal analysis of airborne and dropsonde observations. The manner in which that extra real energy manifests itself will affect the operation of adaptive optics in ground-based telescopes directly via the representation of atmospheric turbulence [10]; isotropy (Kolmogorov) was never observed [17,22]. This is shown in Figure 1 and Figure 12 of these references, respectively. While the intermittency of temperature is less at night, when ground-based telescopes operate, it is not zero. At any one time, half the atmosphere is subject to solar radiation and the resulting anisotropic turbulence propagates. There is evidence that clear air turbulence has increased under climate heating [11]. Note that measurements taken from dropsondes are free of the turbulent wake of the balloon, unlike the data taken on ascent by routine operational radiosondes.
A second way in which anisotropic turbulence will affect ground-based interferometric telescopes is in the calculation of spectral line shapes, especially of water vapour and its oligomers [8,25]. There is a need to check the rotational and translational population distributions of the major constituents, N2 and O2. Although these are homonuclear diatomic molecules possessing no electric dipole moment, there are collision-induced spectra in nitrogen accessible by coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy (CARS) [26,27]. Oxygen possesses a magnetic dipole moment in its 3Σg- ground state via the coupling of electron spins to the rotation of the internuclear axis [26], which is evident as a spectrum in the 50–60 Ghz frequency range. Oxygen also has a CARS spectrum [26]. Nonlocal thermodynamic equilibrium conditions and their effect on molecular spectra will be of relevance for observations of exoplanetary atmospheres as an end in themselves and as a complicating factor arising from Earth’s atmosphere. The translational energy distribution of N2 and O2 in air may be measured using current molecular beam techniques, although it is likely to be a demanding observation.
The observation that led to the conclusion that local thermodynamic equilibrium does not exist in the Earth’s lower stratosphere was the correlation between the intermittency of temperature with both the ozone photodissociation rate and with temperature itself, as illustrated in Figures 2 and 3 of reference [7] and Figure 16 of [26]. It should be extended downwards to the troposphere and upwards throughout the stratosphere.
The abundance of water molecules in the air column above ground-based telescopes is open to perturbation, in the form of a probable increase, under climate heating. Both the temperature and the pressure distribution will in principle be involved. Rises in sea surface temperature will be the basic driver. Observations of water in exoplanetary atmospheres will be affected.
Satellite retrievals are based on spectra taken under equilibrium conditions in laboratories. This has the potential to fold thermodynamic equilibrium into analyses of the atmosphere, possibly a source of error that would cause unrealistic agreement between the analyses and forecast integrations by the models. The effects of turbulence and non-Maxwellian velocity distributions upon the line shapes of carbon dioxide and water vapour, particularly in the important unsaturated wings of the IR spectral lines, are critical in global heating. The two molecules in real air will trap more upwelling IR radiation than those in a model atmosphere employing local thermodynamic equilibrium.
Carbon dioxide increases affect ozone abundance, as well as that of water vapour in theory, and arguably did so in fact from 1926 to the early 1970s. Ozone is a significant ’blanket’ infrared absorber, as well as a ‘parasol molecule’ in the Earth’s atmosphere, and could therefore be such in exoplanets. Overall, the chemistry of Earth’s atmosphere constitutes a complex, scale-free network that is affected by a multitude of radiative, chemical and fluid mechanical processes. It is not currently predictable with any certainty how most of these, except water, carbon dioxide and ozone, will evolve under global heating. This further implies that exoplanetary atmospheres are likely to be both complex and different to Earth in their atmospheric composition, as well as in signatures of ‘civilizations’. There are basic considerations derived from Earth’s atmospheric photochemistry that will apply to the different compositions in exoplanets [28,29].
Aerosols, their air–water interface and the physics that produces them are thus important, particularly in the search for life on exoplanets. Examples on Earth can be found in [30,31]. Lightning is one such example, having been observed on Jupiter [32]. Its similarity to Earth’s lightning makes Earth observations relevant [32,33,34,35]. These processes are dependent on deep convection, which in turn will be increased by the heating of the Earth’s surface. The Martian atmosphere has photochemistry [36,37] and displays statistical multifractal behaviour [38]. The Martian atmosphere’s surface pressure is about 7 mbar, like the upper stratosphere on Earth, where there is a significant shortfall in temperature calculations by models [15,17]. Another example is the aerosol composition introduced by meteorite impacts in Earth’s upper atmosphere [30,39]. Will aerosols and meteorites be observable on exoplanets from ground-based telescopes? Technetium or plutonium, for example, would be a signature of a technological civilization. That would also be true of combinations of ordinary elements into unusual molecules; or alloys of transition metals, lanthanides, and actinides [39]. The chemical composition of atmospheric aerosols is accessible by spectroscopic methods [40,41]. The detection of the entropy production necessitated by the organization of a civilization would add conviction—for example, the increase in so-called ‘greenhouse’ gases in our atmosphere and in the outgoing infrared radiation to space that is the entropy production for Earth’s organized biosphere [17].
The cold bias in many current atmospheric models may be attributable to other processes that are absent or imperfectly represented, such as gravity waves and subgrid-scale parametrizations. Indeed, the scatter in the simulations from such models may be caused by such inadequacies. The cause proposed here stems from extensive observations. Note that there are recent theoretical arguments as to why different definitions of temperature tend to converge [42]. These cannot account for the correlation of observed air temperature intermittency with ozone photodissociation rate and with temperature itself, as reported in [1,17].

5. Conclusions

The above discussion implies the need for a research program to make the measurements necessary to characterize the extent of the turbulent extra energy in Earth’s atmosphere arising from global heating and departures from local thermodynamic equilibrium, and how these factors are and will be manifested. See [1] for further details. Population distributions of the translational and rotational energies of N2 and O2 are required from the surface to the stratopause. Real air contains more energy than that simulated in current climate models. The same consideration will apply in the different compositions likely on exoplanets.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data used are available on the NASA Airborne Database https://earthdata.nasa.gov/ (accessed on 5 June 2021).

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements can be traced via references [17,18,19,25,31,33] of [7] below.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tuck, A.F. Air temperature intermittency and photofragment excitation. Meteorology 2023, 2, 445–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Thrush, B.A. Concluding remarks. Faraday Discuss. 1995, 100, 459–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cox, R.A. Concluding remarks. Faraday Discuss. 2005, 130, 519–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Levy, H. Normal atmosphere: Large radical and formaldehyde concentrations predicted. Science 1971, 173, 141–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Logan, J.A.; McElroy, M.B. Distribution functions for energetic oxygen atoms in the earth’s lower atmosphere. Planet. Space Sci. 1977, 25, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rogaski, C.A.; Mack, J.A.; Wodtke, A.M. State-to-state rate constants for relaxation of highly vibrationally excited O2 and implications for its atmospheric fate. Faraday Discuss. 1995, 100, 229–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tuck, A.F.; Hovde, S.J.; Richard, E.C.; Gao, R.-S.; Bui, T.P.; Swartz, W.H.; Lloyd, S.A. Molecular velocity distributions and generalized scale invariance in the turbulent atmosphere. Faraday Discuss. 2005, 130, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tuck, A.F. Molecular origins of turbulence. Meteorology 2024, 3, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lovejoy, S.; Schertzer, D. The Weather and Climate: Emergent Laws and Multifractal Cascades; Chapter 5.1; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013; pp. 127–128. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bradford, L.W.; Flatter, S.M.; Max, C.E. Modelling atmospheric turbulence effects on a ground-based interferometer. In Proceedings of the 1994 Symposium on Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation for the 21st Century, Kailua, Kona, HI, USA, 9 June 1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Prosser, M.C.; Williams, P.D.; Marlton, G.J.; Harrison, R.G. Evidence for large increases in clear-air turbulence over the past four decades. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2023, 50, e2023GL103814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kelly, K.K.; Tuck, A.F.; Heidt, L.E.; Loewenstein, M.; Podolske, J.R.; Strahan, S.E.; Vedder, J.F. A comparison of ER-2 measurements of stratospheric water vapor between the 1987 Antarctic and 1989 Arctic airborne missions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1990, 17, 465–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kelly, K.K.; Tuck, A.F.; Davies, T. Wintertime asymmetry of upper tropospheric water between the northern and southern hemispheres. Nature 1991, 353, 244–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, H.; Pierrehumbert, R.T. Production of dry air by isentropic mixing. J. Atmos. Sci. 1994, 51, 3437–3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Marlton, G.; Charlton-Perez, A.; Harrison, G.; Polichtchouk, I.; Hauchecorne, A.; Keckhut, P.; Wing, R.; Leblanc, T.; Steinbrecht, W. Using a network of temperature lidars to identify temperature biases in the upper stratosphere in ECMWF reanalyses. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2021, 21, 6079–6092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tuck, A.F. Proposed empirical entropy and Gibbs energy based on observations of scale invariance in open nonequilibrium systems. J. Phys. Chem. A 2017, 121, 6620–6629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tuck, A.F. Scaling up: Molecular to meteorological via symmetry breaking and statistical multifractality. Meteorology 2022, 1, 4–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chan, K.R.; Scott, S.G.; Bui, T.P.; Bowen, S.W.; Day, J. Temperature and horizontal wind measurements on the ER-2 aircraft during the 1987 Airborne Antarctic Ozone Experiment. J. Geophys. Res. D 1989, 94, 11573–11587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Proffitt, M.H.; Steinkamp, M.J.; Powell, J.A.; McLaughlin, R.J.; Mills, O.A.; Schmeltekopf, A.L.; Thompson, T.L.; Tuck, A.F.; Tyler, T.; Winkler, R.H.; et al. In situ ozone measurements within the 1987 Antarctic ozone hole from a high-altitude ER-2 aircraft. J. Geophys. Res. 1989, 94, 16547–16555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. McElroy, C.T. A spectroradiometer for the measurement of direct and scattered solar irradiance from on-board the NASA high altitude research aircraft. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1995, 22, 1361–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kelly, K.K.; Tuck, A.F.; Murphy, D.M.; Proffitt, M.H.; Fahey, D.W.; Jones, R.L.; McKenna, D.S.; Loewenstein, M.; Podolske, J.R.; Strahan, S.E.; et al. Dehydration in the lower Antarctic stratosphere during late winter and early spring, 1987. J. Geophys. Res. 1989, 94, 11317–11358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hovde, S.J.; Tuck, A.F.; Lovejoy, S.; Schertzer, D. Vertical scaling of temperature, wind and humidity fluctuations: Dropsondes from 13 km to the surface of the Pacific Ocean. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 32, 5891–5918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Newman, P.A.; Fahey, D.W.; Brune, W.H.; Kurylo, M.J. Preface. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 1999, 104, 481–495. [Google Scholar]
  24. Newman, P.A.; Harris, N.R.P.; Adriani, A.; Amanatidis, G.T.; Anderson, J.G.; Braathen, G.O.; Brune, W.H.; Carslaw, K.C.; Craig, M.S.; DeCola, P.L.; et al. An overview of the SOLVE/THESEO 2000 campaign. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2002, 107, SOL 1-1–SOL 1-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vaida, V.; Daniel, J.S.; Kjaergaard, H.G.; Goss, L.M.; Tuck, A.F. Atmospheric absorption of near infrared and visible solar radiation by the hydrogen bonded water dimer. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2001, 127, 1627–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Herzberg, G. Molecular Structure and Molecular Spectra. I. Spectra of Diatomic Molecules, 2nd ed.; Van Nostrand: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1950. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dreier, T.; Lange, B.; Wolfrum, J.; Zahn, M. Determination of temperature and concentration of molecular nitrogen, oxygen and methane with coherent anti-stokes raman scattering. Appl. Phys. B 1988, 45, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rapf, R.J.; Vaida, V. Sunlight as an energetic driver in the synthesis of molecules necessary for life. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 20067–20084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Deal, A.M.; Rapf, R.J.; Vaida, V. Water-air interfaces as environments to address the water paradox in prebiotic chemistry: A physical chemistry perspective. J. Phys. Chem. A 2021, 125, 4929–4942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Murphy, D.M.; Thomson, D.S.; Mahoney, M.J. In situ measurements of organics, meteoritic material, mercury and other elements in aerosols at 5 to 19 kilometers. Science 1998, 282, 1664–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ellison, G.B.; Tuck, A.F.; Vaida, V. Processing of organic aerosols. J. Geophys. Res. D 1999, 104, 11633–11641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kolmašová, I.; Santolík, O.; Masafumi, I.; Kurth, W.S.; Hospodarsky, G.B.; Connerney, J.E.P.; Bolton, S.J.; Rádek, L. Lightning at Jupiter pulsates with a similar rhythm as in-cloud lightning at Earth. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tuck, A.F. Production of nitrogen oxides by lightning discharges. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1976, 102, 749–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Brune, W.H.; McFarland, P.J.; Bruning, E.; Waugh, S.; McGorman, D.; Miller, D.O.; Jenkins, M.J.; Ren, X.; Mao, J.; Peischl, J. Extreme oxidant amounts produced by lightning in storm clouds. Science 2021, 372, 711–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, H.; Pei, Y.; Yin, Y.; Shen, L.; Chen, K.; Shi, Z.; Chen, J. Observational evidence of lightning-generated ultrafine aerosols. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2021, 48, e2021GL093771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chang, Y.; Yu, Y.; An, F.; Luo, Z.; Quan, D.; Zhang, X.; Hu, X.; Li, Q.; Yang, J.; Chen, Z.; et al. Three body photodissociation of the water molecule and its implications for prebiotic oxygen production. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Alday, J.; Trokhimovskiy, A.; Patel, M.R.; Federova, A.A.; Lefèvre, F.; Montmessin, F.; Holmes, J.A.; Rajendran, K.; Mason, J.P.; Olsen, K.S.; et al. Photochemical depletion of heavy CO isotopes in the Martian atmosphere. Nat. Astron. 2023, 7, 867–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, W.; Lovejoy, S.; Muller, J.-P. Mars atmosphere: Our statistical twin. J. Geophys. Res. D 2016, 121, 11968–11988. [Google Scholar]
  39. Murphy, D.M.; Abou-Ghanem, M.; Cziczo, D.J.; Froyd, K.D.; Jacquot, J.; Lawler, M.J.; Maloney, C.; Plane, J.M.C.; Ross, M.N.; Schill, G.P.; et al. Metals from spacecraft reentry in stratospheric aerosol particles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2313374120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Spang, R.; Remedios, J.J. Observations of a distinctive infra-red spectral feature in the atmospheric spectra of polar stratospheric clouds measured by the CRISTA instrument. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003, 30, 1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lecours, M.; Boone, C.D.; Bernath, P.F. Antarctic polar stratospheric cloud analysis of ACE-FTS data from 2005–2023. J. Geophys. Res.-D 2024, 129, e2024JD040990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hecht, L.; Caprini, L.; Löwen, H.; Liebchen, B. How to define temperature in active systems? J. Chem. Phys. 2024, 161, 224904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Relationship of molecular velocity to temperature. The red curve is hypothetical, illustrating non-LTE conditions arising from translationally hot photofragments. Appears as Figure 3 in [1]. The black curve corresponds to the Maxwell-Boltzmann equilibrium distribution.
Figure 1. Relationship of molecular velocity to temperature. The red curve is hypothetical, illustrating non-LTE conditions arising from translationally hot photofragments. Appears as Figure 3 in [1]. The black curve corresponds to the Maxwell-Boltzmann equilibrium distribution.
Atmosphere 16 00056 g001
Table 1. The equivalence between statistical thermodynamic and scaling variables.
Table 1. The equivalence between statistical thermodynamic and scaling variables.
VariableStatistical ThermodynamicsScaling Equivalent
TemperatureT1/qkBoltzmann
Partition functionfeK(q)
EnergyEγ
EntropyS(E)c(γ)
Gibbs free energyGK(q)/q
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tuck, A.F. Why the Real Atmosphere Has More Energy than Climate Models: Implications for Ground-Based Telescopes. Atmosphere 2025, 16, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16010056

AMA Style

Tuck AF. Why the Real Atmosphere Has More Energy than Climate Models: Implications for Ground-Based Telescopes. Atmosphere. 2025; 16(1):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16010056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tuck, Adrian F. 2025. "Why the Real Atmosphere Has More Energy than Climate Models: Implications for Ground-Based Telescopes" Atmosphere 16, no. 1: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16010056

APA Style

Tuck, A. F. (2025). Why the Real Atmosphere Has More Energy than Climate Models: Implications for Ground-Based Telescopes. Atmosphere, 16(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16010056

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop