Next Article in Journal
Symbolic Regression-Based Genetic Approximations of the Colebrook Equation for Flow Friction
Previous Article in Journal
Explaining Water Pricing through a Water Security Lens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modified Richards’ Equation to Improve Estimates of Soil Moisture in Two-Layered Soils after Infiltration

1
College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2
College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(9), 1174; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091174
Submission received: 12 July 2018 / Revised: 14 August 2018 / Accepted: 22 August 2018 / Published: 2 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Hydrology)

Abstract

Soil moisture distribution plays a significant role in soil erosion, evapotranspiration, and overland flow. Infiltration is a main component of the hydrological cycle, and simulations of soil moisture can improve infiltration process modeling. Different environmental factors affect soil moisture distribution in different soil layers. Soil moisture distribution is influenced mainly by soil properties (e.g., porosity) in the upper layer (10 cm), but by gravity-related factors (e.g., slope) in the deeper layer (50 cm). Richards’ equation is a widely used infiltration equation in hydrological models, but its homogeneous assumptions simplify the pattern of soil moisture distribution, leading to overestimates. Here, we present a modified Richards’ equation to predict soil moisture distribution in different layers along vertical infiltration. Two formulae considering different controlling factors were used to estimate soil moisture distribution at a given time and depth. Data for factors including slope, soil depth, porosity, and hydraulic conductivity were obtained from the literature and in situ measurements and used as prior information. Simulations were compared between the modified and the original Richards’ equations and with measurements taken at different times and depths. Comparisons with soil moisture data measured in situ indicated that the modified Richards’ equation still had limitations in terms of reproducing soil moisture in different slope positions and rainfall periods. However, compared with the original Richards’ equation, the modified equation estimated soil moisture with spatial diversity in the infiltration process more accurately. The equation may benefit from further solutions that consider various controlling factors in layers. Our results show that the proposed modified Richards’ equation provides a more effective approach to predict soil moisture in the vertical infiltration process.
Keywords: soil moisture distribution; Richards’ equation; vertical infiltration; layered soils soil moisture distribution; Richards’ equation; vertical infiltration; layered soils

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, H.; Liu, T.; Xue, B.; A., Y.; Wang, G. Modified Richards’ Equation to Improve Estimates of Soil Moisture in Two-Layered Soils after Infiltration. Water 2018, 10, 1174. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091174

AMA Style

Zhu H, Liu T, Xue B, A. Y, Wang G. Modified Richards’ Equation to Improve Estimates of Soil Moisture in Two-Layered Soils after Infiltration. Water. 2018; 10(9):1174. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091174

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Honglin, Tingxi Liu, Baolin Xue, Yinglan A., and Guoqiang Wang. 2018. "Modified Richards’ Equation to Improve Estimates of Soil Moisture in Two-Layered Soils after Infiltration" Water 10, no. 9: 1174. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091174

APA Style

Zhu, H., Liu, T., Xue, B., A., Y., & Wang, G. (2018). Modified Richards’ Equation to Improve Estimates of Soil Moisture in Two-Layered Soils after Infiltration. Water, 10(9), 1174. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091174

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop