Next Article in Journal
A New Method to Estimate Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Geostationary Satellite Imagery: Practical Considerations
Next Article in Special Issue
Pan-European Calculation of Hydrologic Stress Metrics in Rivers: A First Assessment with Potential Connections to Ecological Status
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial and Temporal Variation of Dissolved Heavy Metals in the Mun River, Northeast Thailand
Previous Article in Special Issue
Estimation of Water Budget Components of the Sakarya River Basin by Using the WEAP-PGM Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modeling Riparian Restoration Impacts on the Hydrologic Cycle at the Babacomari Ranch, SE Arizona, USA

1
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Geographic Science Center, 520 N. Park Avenue, Ste. #102K, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
2
U.S. Geological Survey, Arizona Water Science Center, 520 N. Park Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
3
Lacher Hydrological Consulting, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
4
Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
5
BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(2), 381; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020381
Submission received: 21 December 2018 / Revised: 12 February 2019 / Accepted: 18 February 2019 / Published: 22 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hydrologic Modelling for Water Resources and River Basin Management)

Abstract

This paper describes coupling field experiments with surface and groundwater modeling to investigate rangelands of SE Arizona, USA using erosion-control structures to augment shallow and deep aquifer recharge. We collected field data to describe the physical and hydrological properties before and after gabions (caged riprap) were installed in an ephemeral channel. The modular finite-difference flow model is applied to simulate the amount of increase needed to raise groundwater levels. We used the average increase in infiltration measured in the field and projected on site, assuming all infiltration becomes recharge, to estimate how many gabions would be needed to increase recharge in the larger watershed. A watershed model was then applied and calibrated with discharge and 3D terrain measurements, to simulate flow volumes. Findings were coupled to extrapolate simulations and quantify long-term impacts of riparian restoration. Projected scenarios demonstrate how erosion-control structures could impact all components of the annual water budget. Results support the potential of watershed-wide gabion installation to increase total aquifer recharge, with models portraying increased subsurface connectivity and accentuated lateral flow contributions.
Keywords: restoration science; surface-to-groundwater; modeling; hydrologic budget; augmented recharge restoration science; surface-to-groundwater; modeling; hydrologic budget; augmented recharge

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Norman, L.M.; Callegary, J.B.; Lacher, L.; Wilson, N.R.; Fandel, C.; Forbes, B.T.; Swetnam, T. Modeling Riparian Restoration Impacts on the Hydrologic Cycle at the Babacomari Ranch, SE Arizona, USA. Water 2019, 11, 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020381

AMA Style

Norman LM, Callegary JB, Lacher L, Wilson NR, Fandel C, Forbes BT, Swetnam T. Modeling Riparian Restoration Impacts on the Hydrologic Cycle at the Babacomari Ranch, SE Arizona, USA. Water. 2019; 11(2):381. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Norman, Laura M., James B. Callegary, Laurel Lacher, Natalie R. Wilson, Chloé Fandel, Brandon T. Forbes, and Tyson Swetnam. 2019. "Modeling Riparian Restoration Impacts on the Hydrologic Cycle at the Babacomari Ranch, SE Arizona, USA" Water 11, no. 2: 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020381

APA Style

Norman, L. M., Callegary, J. B., Lacher, L., Wilson, N. R., Fandel, C., Forbes, B. T., & Swetnam, T. (2019). Modeling Riparian Restoration Impacts on the Hydrologic Cycle at the Babacomari Ranch, SE Arizona, USA. Water, 11(2), 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020381

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop