Direct Numerical Simulations on Jets during the Propagation and Break down of Internal Solitary Waves on a Slope
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The authors provide detailed responses to my queries and the manuscript has been corrected. The document is available for publication
Reviewer 2 Report
The Author has been revised all my suggestions.
This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
see the pdf file
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The paper “Direct Numerical Simulations on Jets during the Propagation and Break down on Internal Solitary Waves on a Slope” focuses on the use of numerical tools to predict of jets during the propagation of Internal Solitary Waves (ISWs). The numerical methodology is using in-house CgLES code for solving 2D cases of jets that are pertinent to the subject of work proposed in this paper. Numerical Models are not well explained how they solve Navier Stokes in space and how they discretize the models.
Overall the paper is of good quality and adds value to other literature studies centered on this subject. The reviewer feels the paper can be substantially improved before being accepted for publications, and therefore suggests the following revisions:
In line 9 affiliation needs to correct as “ cSchool of...”
line 70 It is better to avoid numbering because in this study there are only two purposes so numbering can be changed with brief explanation
line 113 and line 116 is need space before units.
line 158 there are typos for “ twoal results the positon”
line 167 the reference of Forgia does not follow orders as the citation of reference using order as the sequence in text.
line 242 numbering is not necessary,
Figure 6. there is no Legend to explain density contour
Figure 9 too much space is used
Figure 11 there is no Legend for density contour
Conclusion no needs using numbering it is better to explain briefly in conclusion
