Next Article in Journal
Global River Monitoring Using Semantic Fusion Networks
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Treatment of Pharmaceutical Wastewater by an Improved A2/O Process with Ozone Mixed Municipal Wastewater
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Snowmelt on the Spatio-Temporal Variability of Spring Recharge in a Dolomitic Mountain Group, Italian Alps
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Additional Carbon Sources in the Biodegradation of 1,4-Dioxane by a Mixed Culture
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Water
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/w12082257
water-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Electricity Generation, Salt and Nitrogen Removal and Microbial Community in Aircathode Microbial Desalination Cell for Saline-Alkaline Soil-Washing Water Treatment

by
Chenglong Xu
1,2,
Jialei Lu
1,
Zhimiao Zhao
1,2,3,
Yinjiang Zhang
1,2,3,* and
Jiawei Zhang
1
1
College of Marine Ecology and Environment, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
2
Water Environment & Ecology Engineering Research Center of Shanghai Institution of Higher Education, Shanghai 201306, China
3
Hebei Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Conservation, Hengshui 053000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2020, 12(8), 2257; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082257
Submission received: 21 May 2020 / Revised: 28 July 2020 / Accepted: 28 July 2020 / Published: 12 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Biological and Chemical Processes to Wastewater Treatment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
An aircathode microbial desalination cell (AMDC) was successfully started by inoculating anaerobic sludge into the anode of a microbial desalination cell and then used to study the effects of salinity on performance of AMDC and effect of treatment of coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water. The results showed that the desalination cycle and rate gradually shorten, but salt removal gradually increased when the salinity was decreased, and the highest salt removal was 98.00 ± 0.12% at a salinity of 5 g/L. COD removal efficiency was increased with the extension of operation cycle and largest removal efficiency difference was not significant, but the average coulomb efficiency had significant differences under the condition of each salinity. This indicates that salinity conditions have significant influence on salt removal and coulomb efficiency under the combined action of osmotic pressure, electric field action, running time and microbial activity, etc. On the contrary, COD removal effect has no significant differences under the condition of inoculation of the same substrate in the anode chamber. The salt removal reached 99.13 ± 2.1% when the AMDC experiment ended under the condition of washing water of coastal saline-alkaline soil was inserted in the desalination chamber. Under the action of osmotic pressure, ion migration, nitrification and denitrification, NH4+-N and NO3−-N in the washing water of the desalination chamber were removed, and this indicates that the microbial desalination cell can be used to treatment the washing water of coastal saline-alkaline soil. The microbial community and function of the anode electrode biofilm and desalination chamber were analyzed through high-throughput sequencing, and the power generation characteristics, organics degradation and migration and transformation pathways of nitrogen of the aircathode microbial desalination cell were further explained.

1. Introduction

Soil nutrients usually include Cl−, SO42−, CO32−, HCO3−, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ and other ions, which can promote the growth of plants and soil microorganisms. However, when ion concentration is too high, it will directly poison growth and indirectly interfere with normal physiological functions of plants and soil microorganisms [1,2]. Soil salinization is a serious land degradation problem that affects soil, plants and groundwater within ecosystems, and the results showed that the mainly harmful ions were Na+ and Cl− [3]. Soil salinization seriously restricts the construction of ecological environment in coastal area. All these ions in the soil have the property of water solubility. In the process of washing the land, the salt ions dissolve in the water to improve the coastal saline-alkaline soil. However, at the same time, the salt in the water increases sharply, causing serious water resource pollution [4]. Coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water—containing high salt, organics, nitrogen, etc.—has brought a heavy strain on freshwater resource protection. In addition, high salt adversely affects the life activity of aquatic plants, animals and humans, further disturbing aquatic ecology [5]. Thus, effective and simultaneous salt, pollutants removal from coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water are essential before discharge. However, thus far, the researchers have paid much attention on desalination. There are three methods to remove salt ions from washing water: chemical method, biological method and physical method [6,7,8]. There is no study involving simultaneous desalination, pollutants removal from coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water. China is a country with a serious shortage of freshwater resources, so it is very meaningful to study the recycling and utilization of coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water.
Microbial desalination cells (MDCs) are a new type of technology developed from microbial fuel cells (MFCs) for the first time at Tsinghua University for power production, desalination and wastewater treatment [9]. Its concept of operation is similar to water electrodialysis, but the MDC is a device that uses bacteria as a catalyst to transform the chemical energy that exists in wastewater into electricity through electrochemical reactions. MDC employs an additional chamber that contains salty water between the anode and the cathode, containing ion exchange membranes separating the three chambers, and allowing salt ions to be extracted to achieve desalination [10,11,12,13]. After MDC was first invented by Cao et al., extended works have been successively reported, including stacked resin-packed MDC (SR-MDC) [14], treatment of chromium wastewater by new three-chamber microbial desalination cell [15], recirculation microbial desalination cell (rMDC) that avoided pH imbalances and bacterial respiration inhibition to increase power and achieve efficient desalination [16], microbial capacity desalination cell (MCDC) with the capacity can be regenerated through exchange the connection of electrode and activated carbon cloth assemblies [17], etc. Aircathode microbial desalination cell shows great potential in water desalination, wastewater purification and electricity generation due to its sustainability and stability [18,19,20]. However, most studies have so far have only investigated this with lab-scale designs, more importantly, for coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water and its influence on desalination has never been explored.
For further study on scale-up device and broadening the practical application of MDC, it is worth investigating its performance and efficiency in saline-alkaline soil-washing water treatment. Studies have shown that salinity concentration is one of important conditions that could influence the performance of fuel cell due to its effect on the cell internal resistance, the electrode potential, the power production, the organic removal, conductivity and desalination performance, and so on [18,21,22]. Therefore, in the present study, a novel aircathode microbial desalination cell (AMDC) was constructed. It was to analyze the influence of different salinity concentration of high salinity at 30 g/L, medium salinity at 15 g/L, and low salinity at 5 g/L. Meanwhile, salt and pollutants degradation practicability of the AMDC was evaluated with coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water treatment. Microbial communities were detected using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. In addition, the long-term operation stability of AMDC was also examined in terms of current output, power generation, columbic efficiency (CE), internal resistance and cell polarization to further evaluate its practicability.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. AMDC Construction

The three chambers of the AMDC, namely anode, desalination, and cathode chambers, were constructed using an acrylic cube cut into 50-, 60- and 70-cm pieces, respectively, and separated with ion exchange membranes. The three chambers had a total working volume of 630 L (Figure 1). The cation exchange membrane (CMI-Grion0011V, Lvhe Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China) was used to separate the cathode chamber and desalination chamber. The anion exchange membrane (AMI-Grion0011V, Lvhe Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China) were used to separate the anode chamber and desalination chamber, and both membranes had a cross-sectional area of 0.42 m2. Preparations of AEM, CEM and electrodes were according to the description in previous study and the manufacturer’s instructions; the membranes were left in 5% NaCl solution for 48 h to allow hydration and expansion before installation [23]. Both the anode and cathode electrodes material were carbon cloths (B1B, E-Tech, Troy, PA, USA) with a dimension of 50 by 60 cm, and pre-treated with 15% v/v acetone solution for 24 h before use to remove the grease stain on the machined surface. Electrodes were immersed in distilled water before experiments and, then, rinsed with deionized water [24,25]. An external electric circuit was connected by connecting a titanium wire coupled with an external a resistor (1000 Ω).

2.2. System Inoculation

According to previous studies [25,26], to further reduce the start-up period and operating costs of the AMDC, the anode chamber was directly inoculated with aerobic sludge collected from second sedimentation in a local wastewater treatment plant (Lingang New City, Shanghai, China). The ratio of aerobic sludge and nutrient solution (contained 0.56 g·L−1 C6H12O6, 4.40 g·L−1 KH2PO4, 3.40 g·L−1 K2HPO4 and 0.32 g·L−1 NH4Cl) was 1:1, and it was sealed and subjected to constant temperature (30 °C) in a water bath for a few days to obtain anaerobic sludge as an anode chamber inoculation of microorganisms. The volume of sludge mixture used as inoculum was 50% of the total anode chamber volume. The inoculum process continued at the start-up of AMDC until reaching a stable system performance. Coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water was acquired from a washing water treatment pool in coastal saline-alkaline soil (30°55′3.49″ N, 121°58′29.28″ E) adjacent to the East Sea. Coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water composition was salt solution: 6.88 ‰ (equal to 6.88 g/L salinity), COD: 25.85 ± 1.1 mg/L, pH: 6.13 ± 0.08, total nitrogen (TN, 2.7 ± 0.32 mg/L), ammonium nitrogen (NH4+, 1.51 ± 0.21 mg/L), nitrate nitrogen (NO3−, 2.34 ± 0.16 mg/L), total phosphorus (TP, 0.13 ± 0.06 mg/L). To ensure the adequate electron donor, the anode chamber was fed with a glucose based simulative wastewater (COD, 600 mg/L) as fuel containing C6H12O6 (0.56 g/L), KH2PO4 (4.40 g/L), K2HPO4 (3.40 g/L) and NH4Cl (0.32 g/L), pH was 6.67, while the cathode chamber contained KH2PO4 (4.40 g/L), K2HPO4 (3.40 g/L), NH4Cl (0.32 g/L) and NaHCO3 (1.92 g/L), which was aerated continuously by an aerator to increase dissolved oxygen (DO). Cathodic DO concentration was kept at values greater than or equal to 6.0 mg/L by adjusting the flow aerator [27], pH is 6.67. The middle desalination chamber was filled with artificial saltwater containing 30, 15, and 5 g/L NaCl solution.

2.3. Experimental Operation

The common wastewater treatment process has an average hydraulic retention time from 12 to 48 h [25]. Once the system voltage was below to 100 mV, and the electrolytes solution in anode and cathode were replaced [28]. Therefore, a 48-h batch cycle is chosen as reasonable cycle to investigate the system performance in this study. 30 g/L NaCl solution was set in the middle desalination chamber. After successful start-up, high-salinity solution, medium-salinity solution, low-salinity solution and fresh coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water were successively injected into the middle desalination chamber to carry out a complete desalination cycle. For long-term evaluation, the experiments were continuously operated over a period of 50 days (1200 h) at 25 ± 1 °C including the start-up [29].

2.4. Experimental Test and Analysis

Determination of water quality indicators: conventional water quality indicators such as chemical oxygen demand, ammonia nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen of water inlet and outlet of the cell are measured according to standard methods [30,31]. NaCl concentration and conductivity was monitored by using the multi-parameter water quality analyzer (HACH, HQ40D, Loveland, CO, USA).
Determination of electrochemical characteristics: the voltage was recorded every 1 min by an 8-channel data acquisition system (RTKINS Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) connected to a computer, and the averages were calculated per 1 h. Its reading was recorded when a steady state at each resistance value was achieved. Then, power generation, current density (A/m2) and power density (mW/m3) were calculated and reported to the area of electrode and the net total working volume. The polarization curves were obtained by varying the external resistance from 1000 to 50 Ω (the external resistances were, respectively, 1000, 500, 300, 200, 100, 50 Ω) as described by Qu et al. [32]. The internal resistance was obtained from the polarization curve as described by Logan et al. [33]. The coulombic efficiency (CE) was used to characterize the electrical capacity of the anode microorganisms. Excel 2007 was used for data sorting and mapping, and SPSS 17 software was analyzed statistically.
Microbial community determination: after the end of the experiment, the microbial community structure in the anode electrode biofilm (carry out a DNA extraction from the electrodes) and the water in the desalination chamber was analyzed, and the bacteria genera with relative abundance greater than 1% were taken as the main bacteria genus. In this study. The primers sets used were 338F (ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA) and 806R (GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAATAT). The V3–V4 regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene analysis was performed in this study on an Illumina MiSeq platform (Personal Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) [34].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Impact of Salinity on Performance and Start Up of AMDC

3.1.1. Start-Up of AMDC

The cell was operated in fed-batch mode at a temperature of 25 ± 1 °C, and the desalination chamber was filled with 30 g/L of NaCl solution. The dynamic changes in the output voltage trend over time during the operation of the AMDC are shown in Figure 2. The output voltage exceeded 600 mV for three consecutive periods and tended to be stable. The cell start-up phase was complete after 8 days of culture, and the maximum voltage was ~702 mV.
During the stable power production stage of the experiment, polarization measurements were made using a variable resistor box, and the external resistance was reduced stepwise from 1000 to 50 Ω (the external resistances were, respectively, 1000, 500, 300, 200, 100, 50 Ω). The output voltage value, current density and volume power density were recorded and calculated by the area of electrode and the effective volume of the cell. The power density and polarization curves are shown in Figure 3.
As can be seen in Figure 3, the maximum power density of AMDC at 30 g/L salinity is 2.84 W/m3 now (current density is 4.70 mA/m2), which is significantly higher than the maximum power density of 2.27 W/m3 obtained by Mehanna et al. at 20 g/L salinity of a three-chamber air cathode microbial desalination cell [18]. The power density of the cell depends on the system polarization, which is determined by both anode and cathode polarization [35]. Meanwhile, the desalination chamber with high salinity has higher conductivity, which can effectively promote the transfer of salt ions, accelerate the operation of the reactor and improve the effect of desalination. The cell ohm internal resistance is 71.48 Ω by polarization curve. Under the influence of the ionic strength of the solution, the electrode, wire and separator will cause certain ohmic loss, and ohmic internal resistance will affect the output voltage and power density.

3.1.2. Desalination Performance under Diverse Salinity Concentrations

Under different influent salinity, the concentration change and desalination rate of the NaCl solution in the desalination chamber are shown in Figure 4, and the concentration gradient desalinization is considered to be over when the salinity drops more than 95%. It can be seen from Figure 4 that the salt removal can reach above 95% under different salinity, but the time required to remove the same salinity varies greatly. At the end of the experiment, under the salinity of 30, 15 and 5 g/L, the desalination time was 13, 7 and 4 d, the desalination rate was 2.21, 2.09 and 1.23 g/d, respectively, and the salt removal was 95.83 ± 0.21%, 97.60 ± 0.16% and 98.00 ± 0.12%, respectively.
The results show that the desalination cycle and rate become shorter and the salt removal increases as the salinity decreases of the desalination chamber, and the salt removal is the highest at 5 g/L salinity. The decrease of salt concentration in desalination chamber was mainly caused by osmotic pressure and electric field action. Na+ and Cl− migrated to the cathode chamber and the anode chamber respectively under the electric field action. When the conductivity of the anode chamber is lower than that of the desalination chamber, there is an osmotic pressure difference between the anode chamber and the desalination chamber. At this point, the osmosis and electric field jointly cause the salt concentration in the desalination chamber to fall. With the decrease of salinity, the ionic strength and osmotic pressure difference between the anode chamber solution and the desalination chamber become smaller, the osmotic effect decreases and the salt removal becomes slower. On the contrary, the desalination cycle increases and the salt removal decreases with the salinity of desalination chamber increasing. Due to the low salinity of the water in the desalination chamber, the ionic strength and electrical conductivity continuously decrease with the prolongation of time, leading to the ohmic resistance of the desalination chamber and the decrease of the current. Under the action of the electric field, the ion migration is slow, and the conductivity difference between the anode chamber and the desalination chamber was reduced and the osmotic effect was weakened.

3.1.3. Organic Removal and Coulomb Efficiency under Diverse Salinity Concentration

The nutrient solution of anode chamber was replaced every 48 h, the COD removal effect and coulomb efficiency were shown in Figure 5 under different salinity conditions in the desalination chamber. As can be seen from Figure 5a, the COD removal rate gradually increased from 225.5 ± 1.2 mg/(L·day) in the 6th cycle to 264.0 ± 1.5 mg/(L·day) in the 11th cycle under the salinity of 30 g/L. According to Figure 5b, under the salinity of the desalination chamber of 15 g/L, COD removal rate gradually increased from 251.5 ± 2.0 mg/(L·day) in the 13th cycle to 265.0 ± 0.9 mg/(L·day) in the 15th cycle in the stable phase. According to Figure 5c, under the salinity of the desalination chamber of 5 g/L, COD removal rate gradually increased from 265.0 ± 2.1 mg/(L·day) in the 17th cycle to 266.0 ± 1.4 mg/(L·day) in the 18th cycle in the stable phase. As can be seen from Figure 5d, the maximum coulomb efficiency under the salinity of 30, 15 and 5 g/L was 13.91 ± 0.5%, 17.60 ± 0.2% and 18.53 ± 0.7%, respectively.
The results showed that COD removal rate at each salinity increased and tended to be stable with the extension of the operating cycle, but the maximum COD removal rate at each salinity showed no significant difference (p > 0.05), which was consistent with the results of inoculation of the same substrate and consistent with previous studies [27]. The maximum coulomb efficiency of the desalting chamber with salinity of 5 g/L is higher than that of the other two. As mentioned above, the desalination cycle of higher desalination chamber salinity is longer. With the increase of running time, the anode biofilm gradually matures and the microorganisms gradually adapt to the living environment. It is possible that, due to the excessive increment of non-electric-producing bacteria in this process and the large consumption of substrate organic matter, the coulomb efficiency decreases with the prolonging of desalination time under the high desalination chamber salinity.

3.2. AMDC Treatment Results and Analysis of Saline-Alkaline Soil-Washing Water

3.2.1. AMDC Power Generation and Desalination Efficiency

The voltage output and desalination efficiency of the AMDC desalination chamber are shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7 under the condition that the actual coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water. After six cycles of operation, the peak voltage was ~742 mV at open-circuit state, and the salt removal of AMDC at the end of operation was 99.13 ± 2.1%. Studies have shown that low-salinity wastewater charge accumulation in wastewater can be solved as well as the negative impact of ohmic losses, overcoming the high-salinity wastewater as the substrate system’s low conductivity; in the long-run conditions, low salinity caused actual coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water to obtain high desalination efficiency, and the aircathode microbial desalination cell reached the requirement of the required in terms of desalination.

3.2.2. Change Efficiency in Inorganic Nitrogen Concentration of the AMDC

During the operation phase of AMDC in the wash water inlet of coastal saline-alkaline soil, the substrate of the anode chamber was the activated sludge mixed with glucose. At the end of operation, the change rate of AMDC inorganic nitrogen concentration is shown in Table 1 and Figure 8. The removal rates of ammonia nitrogen in anode chamber, cathode chamber and desalination chamber were 70.88 ± 0.15%, 82.11 ± 0.18% and 78.68 ± 0.20%, respectively; the removal rates of nitrate nitrogen were 12.52 ± 0.04%, 6.72 ± 0.02% and −16.49 ± 0.03%, respectively.
During the whole process, NH4+ was converted in the anode chamber to reduce the content of NH4+ in the solution under the action of denitrification anaerobic ammonia oxidation, and NH4+ was transferred to the cathode chamber through the cation exchange membrane in the desalination chamber. At the same time, the desalination chamber may contain denitrifying bacteria from washing water. Under the combined action of denitrification and ion migration, NH4+-N in the desalination chamber can be removed, and the removal rate is higher than that in the anode chamber [36]. After NH4+ in the desalination chamber is transferred to the cathode chamber, nitrification takes place under higher dissolved oxygen conditions and is converted into NO3−-N, which makes the concentration of NO3− in the cathode chamber rise and shows a higher negative removal rate. Under the action of infiltration and electric field, NO3− in the washing water of the desalination chamber is transferred to the anode chamber, resulting in the decrease of NO3−-N in the washing water, but lower than the removal rate of NO3−-N in the anode chamber. It is possible that the migration rate and denitrification rate of NO3− in washing water are lower than that of NO3− in the anode chamber, which is closely related to the denitrification of a small part of NO3−-N in the desalination chamber [37]. Therefore, in order to further explain the nitrogen migration and transformation pathway in the microbial desalination cell, high-throughput sequencing was used to sequence the anode electrode biofilm and the microorganisms in the desalination chamber water, explaining the ammonia nitrogen removal pathway in the actual coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water.

3.3. Analysis of Microbial Community Diversity

3.3.1. Microbial Diversity Index

As the core of the air-cathode microbial desalination cell, microorganisms play an important role in generating electricity and removing pollutants in the process of bio-catalytic reaction. Through the sequencing analysis of 16S rRNA gene library, the microbial community structure in the water body of AMDC reactor anode electrode biofilm and desalination chamber was analyzed, and was divided according to the homology of 97%.
The results showed that the microbial richness in the anode electrode biofilm was greater than that in the desalination chamber and showing more OTU. On the contrary, the evenness of the microbial community composition in the water of the desalination chamber is slightly better than that of the anode electrode biofilm, and the abundance difference among OTUs in the community is small. The richness and diversity of the two are different, which is caused by the different growth environment of microorganisms in the anode chamber and desalination chamber. The microbial Shannon index in the water of the anode electrode biofilm and desalination chamber was 7.99 and 7.45, respectively.

3.3.2. Microbial Communities in the Genus Levels

Illumina Miseq sequencing platform was used to analyze the microbial community structure in the anode electrode biofilm of the aircathode microbial desalination cell and the water of the desalination chamber. The main bacteria genera in the water of the desalination chamber and the anode biofilm are shown in Figure 9.
The dominant species of anode biofilm were Bacteroides (18.6%), Pseudomonas (13.8%) and Arcobacter (7.9%). The dominant bacteria were Arcobacter (21.6%), Lactococcus (21.2%) and Actinobacter (6.3%). Figure 9a shows that a total of three electroactive bacteria were found in the anode membrane, namely Pseudomonas (13.8%) [38], Arcobacter (7.9%) [39] and Bacillus (4.6%) [40]. The total abundance of the electrochemically active bacteria was 22.9%. Pseudomonas belongs to the genus of heterotrophic denitrifying bacteria under the Proteobacteria, and is also one of the typical and most common electrochemically active microorganisms. It is widely found in the anaerobic biological anodes of microbial fuel cells such as brewery and pig wastewater treatment, realizing the cell’s power production function [41]. At the same time, two species of hydrolyzed fermentation bacteria were found in the anode membrane, namely Bacteroides (18.6%) and Propionibacterium (2.3%), and the total abundance of hydrolyzed fermentation bacteria was 20.9%. Through the metabolism of organic matter, glucose or xylose can be fermented as small molecules of mixed acid, accelerate the metabolism of electroactive bacteria to the common matrix, improve the activity of electroactive bacteria [42,43,44]. Combined with the situation of COD degradation, it can be inferred that a large amount of glucose fermentation bacteria consume the anode substrate but produce no electric energy, resulting in a high COD removal rate in the reactor, but the cell output voltage and ohmic internal resistance are not ideal. In addition, two denitrifying bacteria genera were found in the anode membrane, Pseudomonas (13.8%) and Acinetobacter (3.7%), the total abundance of denitrifying bacteria was 17.5%. Such denitrifying bacteria have denitrifying function and participate in nitrogen transformation, which is one of the main reasons for the rapid removal of NH4+-N and NO3−-N in the anode chamber [45,46,47].
According to Figure 9b, three denitrifying bacteria of Pseudomonas (3.2%), Acinetobacter (6.3%) and Stenotrophomonas (1%) were found in the desalination chamber, and the total abundance of denitrifying bacteria was 10.5%. The abundance of denitrifying bacteria in the water of the desalination chamber is lower than that in the anode biofilm, which is the reason why the removal rate of NO3−-N in the desalination chamber is slightly lower than that in the anode chamber. Of course, this also explains the removal of NO3−-N in the desalination chamber not only because of the concentration difference, but also the denitrification reaction under the action of denitrifying bacteria.

4. Conclusions

(1)
Salinity conditions affect the performance of microbial desalination cell. With the decrease of salinity, the desalination cycle and rate become shorter and the salt removal increases. At higher salinity, salt ion transfer in the desalination chamber leads to charge accumulation and longer desalination time. Low-salinity wastewater can solve the negative effects of charge accumulation and ohmic loss in wastewater, and overcome the low conductivity problem of high-salinity wastewater as the system substrate.
(2)
The experimental results show that the pollutants removal rate and desalination effect of AMDC can meet the conditions when it is used to treat the actual coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water, but the output power cannot meet the actual demand, and there is a limit of water treatment. AMDC can assist in the primary desalination of brine such as coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water, or the secondary desalination of water after the initial desalination of water treatment equipment. However, as an independent application of desalination equipment in engineering projects, the effect has not yet been achieved, which needs further research and improvement.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.X., J.L. and J.Z.; methodology, C.X. and Y.Z.; validation, Z.Z. and Y.Z.; investigation, C.X. and J.L.; data curation, C.X.; writing—original draft preparation, C.X.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z.; supervision, Y.Z.; funding acquisition, Z.Z. and Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51909157), the Open Foundation of Hebei Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Conservation (No. hklk201912), the Saline-alkaline Soil Improvement Project of Shanghai (No. D-8005-18-0228), and the Luo Zhaorao Science and Innovation Fund of Shanghai Ocean University (No. A1-2004-20-201307).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Personal Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) for conducting the Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jiang, X.J.; Geng, C.Y.; Han, J.Q.; Zhou, Y.M. Effects of warming onmineral element contents in leaves of dominant species and in soils in Changbai Mountain tundra. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2016, 7, 1928–1935. [Google Scholar]
  2. Epstein, E.; Rains, D.W. Advances in Salt Tolerance. Plant Soil 1987, 99, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Conde, I.S.; Lobo, M.C.; Hernández, R.I.B.; Varaldo, H.M.P. Remediation of saline soils by a two-step process: Washing and amendment with sludge. Geoderma 2015, 247, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, L.; Kong, Q.C.; Liang, Y.X. Research on Recycling of Washing Water in Saline land. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2010, 16, 263–265. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang, L.F.; Fu, G.K.; Zhang, Z. High-efficiency salt, sulfate and nitrogen removal and microbial community in biocathode microbial desalination cell for mustard tuber wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 289, 121630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sharma, B.A.; Yadav, J.S.P. Removal during leaching and availability of iron and manganese in pyrite and farmyard-manure-treated alkali soil. Soil Sci. 1989, 147, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, Z.G.; Liu, X.J.; Zhang, X.M. Infiltration of melting saline ice water in soil columns: Consequences on soil moisture and salt content. Agric. Water Manag. 2008, 95, 498–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Z.; Li, G.; Qin, P. The prediction of ecological potential for developing salt-tolerant oil plants on coastal saline land in Sheyang Saltern, China. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cao, X.X.; Huang, X.; Liang, P.; Xiao, K.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, X.; Logan, B.E. A new method for water desalination using microbial desalination cells. Environ. Sci Technol. 2009, 43, 7148–7152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Al-Mamun, A.; Ahmad, W.; Baawain, M.S.; Khadem, M.; Dhar, B.R. A review of microbial desalination cell technology: Configurations, optimization and applications. J. Clean Prod. 2018, 183, 458–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, Y.; Logan, B.E. Series assembly of microbial desalination cells containing stacked electrodialysis cells for partial or complete seawater desalination. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 5840–5845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kokabian, B.; Gude, V.G.; Smith, R.; Brooks, J.P. Evaluation of anammox biocathode in microbial desalination and wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 342, 410–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ebrahimia, A.; Kebria, D.Y.; Najafpour, G.D. Co-treatment of septage and municipal wastewater in a quadripartite microbial desalination cell. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 354, 1092–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zuo, K.C.; Cai, J.X.; Liang, S.; Wu, S.J.; Zhang, C.Y.; Liang, P.; Huang, X. A ten liter stacked microbial desalination cell packed with mixed ion-exchange resins for secondary effluent desalination. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 9917–9924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, C.; Wang, J.Q.; Chen, S.H.; Lu, F.; Yang, J.P.; Yang, F. Treatment of chromium wastewater by new microbial desalination cells. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2013, 5, 1843–1848. [Google Scholar]
  16. Qu, Y.P.; Feng, Y.J.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Lv, J.W.; He, W.H.; Logan, B.E. Simultaneous water desalination and electricity generation in a microbial desalination cell with electrolyte recirculation for pH control. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 106, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ma, D.D.; Li, R.Y.; Casey, F.; Ren, Z.M.; Ji, M. Investigation on the performance of microbial capacity desalination cell. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2014, 6, 1375–1380. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mehanna, M.; Saito, T.; Yan, J.L.; Hickner, M.; Cao, X.; Huang, X.; Logan, B.E. Using microbial desalination cells to reduce water salinity prior to reverse osmosis. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 1114–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, J.L.; Lv, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ren, Y.P.; Li, X.F.; Wang, X.H. Endogenous inorganic carbon buffers accumulation and self-buffering capacity enhancement of air-cathode microbial fuel cells through anolyte recycling. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 676, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jacobson, K.S.; Drew, D.M.; He, Z. Efficient salt removal in a continuously operated upflow microbial desalination cell with an air cathode. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 376–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ping, Q.; Huang, Z.; Dosoretz, C.; He, Z. Integrated experimental investigation and mathematical modeling of brackish water desalination and wastewater treatment in microbial desalination cells. Water Res. 2015, 77, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mehanna, M.; Kiely, P.D.; Call, D.F.; Logan, B.E. Microbial electrodialysis cell for simultaneous water desalination and hydrogen gas production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 9578–9583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shehab, N.A.; Amy, G.L.; Logan, B.E.; Saikaly, P.E. Enhanced water desalination efficiency in an air-cathode stacked microbial electrodeionization cell (SMEDIC). J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 469, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, H.M.; Davidson, M.; Zuo, Y.; Ren, Z.Y. Recycled tire crumb rubber anodes for sustainable power production in microbial fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 5863–5866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, C.L.; Lu, J.L.; Zhao, Z.M.; Lu, X.; Zhang, Y.J.; Cheng, M.Q.; Zhang, J.W. Simultaneous bioelectricity generation, desalination, organics degradation, and nitrogen removal in air-cathode microbial desalination cells. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 794–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Xu, C.L.; Cheng, M.Q.; Zhang, Y.J.; Cheng, M.Y.; Lu, J.L. Influence of COD concentration on performance of a three-chambers microbial desalination cells. Appl. Chem. Ind. 2019, 10, 175–178. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhou, H.; Zuo, K.C.; Liang, P.; Zhang, X.Y.; Huang, X. Influence of Salt and Substrate Concentration on Performance of Microbial Desalination Cell. China Water Wastewater 2016, 11, 6–10. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mostafa, R.; Abdelsalam, E.; Hisham, A.H. Evaluating the performance of Microbial Desalination Cells subjected to different operating temperatures. Desalination 2019, 462, 56–66. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wen, Q.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Z.; Li, Y.; Nan, J.; Fengm, Y. Using bacterial catalyst in the cathode of microbial desalination cell to improve wastewater treatment and desalination. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 125, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. American Water Works Association; American Public Health Association; Water Pollution Control Federation. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang, L.F.; Fu, G.K.; Zhang, Z. Simultaneous nutrient and carbon removal and electricity generation in self-buffered biocathode microbial fuel cell for high-salinity mustard tuber wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 272, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qu, Y.P. The Configuration and Performance of Microbial Desalination Cell under Continuous Flow; Harbin Institute of Technology: Harbin, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  33. Logan, B.E.; Hamelers, B.; Rozendal, R.; Schröder, U.; Keller, J.; Freguia, S.; Peter, A.; Verstraete, W.; Rabaey, K. Microbial fuel cells: Methodology and technology. Environ. Sci Technol. 2006, 40, 5181–5192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xu, G.F.; Zheng, X.Y.; Lu, Y.B.; Liu, G.L.; Luo, H.P.; Li, X.; Zhang, R.D.; Jin, S. Development of microbial community within the cathodic biofilm of single-chamber air-cathode microbial fuel cell. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 665, 641–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, G.D.; Wang, K.; Zhao, Q.L.; Jiao, Y.; Lee, D.J. Effect of cathode types on long-term performance and anode bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 118, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lorenzo, M.D.; Scott, K.; Curtis, T.P.; Head, I.M. Effect of increasing anode surface area on the performance of a single chamber microbial fuel cell. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xie, M. Effects of Electrode Materials and Catalyst on Microbial Fuel Cells’ Performance with Aged Landfill Leachate; Chongqing University: Chongqing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L.F.; Song, Z.Z.; Lv, S.; Zha, Z.T.; Chen, S.H. Effect of anode COD on electricity generation and desalination of mustard production wastewater MDC and microbial community analysis under ammonia nitrogen removal. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2020, 14, 943–954. [Google Scholar]
  39. Fedorovich, V.; Knighton, M.C.; Pagaling, E.; Ward, F.B.; Free, A.; Goryanin, I. A Novel Electrochemically Active Bacterium Phylogenetically Related to Arcobacter butzleri Isolated from a Microbial Fuel Cell. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 7326–7334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Nimje, V.R.; Chen, C.Y.; Chen, C.C.; Jean, J.S.; Reddy, A.S.; Fan, C.W.; Pan, K.Y.; Liu, H.T.; Chen, J.L. Stable and high energy generation by a strain of Bacillus subtilis in a microbial fuel cell. J. Power Sources 2009, 190, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yong, X.Y.; Yan, Z.Y.; Shen, H.B.; Zhou, J.; Wu, X.Y.; Zhang, L.J.; Zheng, T.; Jiang, M.; Wei, P.; Jia, H.H.; et al. An integrated aerobic-anaerobic strategy for performance enhancement of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-inoculated microbial fuel cell. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 241, 1191–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, A.; Liu, L.H.; Sun, D.; Ren, N.Q.; Lee, D.J. Isolation of Fe(III)-reducing fermentative bacterium Bacteroides sp. W7 in the anode suspension of a microbial electrolysis cell(MEC). Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2010, 35, 3178–3182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, H.H.; Kong, C.H. Enhanced removal of p-nitrophenol in a microbial fuel cell after long-term operation and the catabolic versatility of its microbial community. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 3391, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wei, P.L.; Lin, M.; Wang, Z.Q.; Fu, H.X.; Yang, H.P.; Jiang, W.Y.; Yang, S.T. Metabolic engineering of Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp. shermanii for xylose fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 219, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Khater, D.Z.; El-Khatib, K.M.; Hassan, H.M. Microbial diversity structure in acetate single chamber microbial fuel cell for electricity generation. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2017, 15, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dong, J.J.; Zhang, Z.M.; Yu, Z.D.; Dai, X.; Xu, X.Y.; Alvarez, P.J.J.; Zhu, L. Evolution and functional analysis of extracellular polymeric substances during the granulation of aerobic sludge used to treat p-chloroaniline wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 330, 596–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tang, C.C.; Tian, Y.; He, Z.W.; Zuo, W.; Zhang, J. Performance and mechanism of a novel algal-bacterial symbiosis system based on sequencing batch suspended biofilm reactor treating domestic wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 265, 422–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Water 12 02257 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of aircathode microbial desalination cell (a) and physical photo (b).
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of aircathode microbial desalination cell (a) and physical photo (b).
Water 12 02257 g001
Water 12 02257 g002 550
Figure 2. Voltage output of the AMDC (arrows indicate replacement of substrate solution).
Figure 2. Voltage output of the AMDC (arrows indicate replacement of substrate solution).
Water 12 02257 g002
Water 12 02257 g003 550
Figure 3. Power density curve and polarization curve of the AMDC.
Figure 3. Power density curve and polarization curve of the AMDC.
Water 12 02257 g003
Water 12 02257 g004 550
Figure 4. Change in NaCl concentration and salt removal of the AMDC ((a) 30 g/L, (b) 15 g/L, (c) 5 g/L salinity).
Figure 4. Change in NaCl concentration and salt removal of the AMDC ((a) 30 g/L, (b) 15 g/L, (c) 5 g/L salinity).
Water 12 02257 g004
Water 12 02257 g005 550
Figure 5. COD removal rate ((a) 30 g/L, (b) 15 g/L, (c) 5 g/L salinity) and culombic efficiency (d) of the AMDC.
Figure 5. COD removal rate ((a) 30 g/L, (b) 15 g/L, (c) 5 g/L salinity) and culombic efficiency (d) of the AMDC.
Water 12 02257 g005
Water 12 02257 g006 550
Figure 6. Voltage output versus time in the AMDC with coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water.
Figure 6. Voltage output versus time in the AMDC with coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water.
Water 12 02257 g006
Water 12 02257 g007 550
Figure 7. Salt removal versus time in the AMDC with coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water.
Figure 7. Salt removal versus time in the AMDC with coastal saline-alkaline soil-washing water.
Water 12 02257 g007
Water 12 02257 g008 550
Figure 8. Change efficiency in inorganic nitrogen concentration of the AMDC.
Figure 8. Change efficiency in inorganic nitrogen concentration of the AMDC.
Water 12 02257 g008
Water 12 02257 g009 550
Figure 9. Microbial communities of anode electrode (a) and the water of the desalination chamber (b) in the genus levels.
Figure 9. Microbial communities of anode electrode (a) and the water of the desalination chamber (b) in the genus levels.
Water 12 02257 g009
Table
Table 1. Influent and effluent concentrations in inorganic nitrogen concentration of the AMDC.
Table 1. Influent and effluent concentrations in inorganic nitrogen concentration of the AMDC.
LocationModepHAmmonium (mg/L)Nitrate Nitrogen (mg/L)
Anode chamberInfluent6.67 ± 0.0142.72 ± 2.152.39 ± 0.18
Effluent5.77 ± 0.0312.44 ± 0.152.09 ± 0.04
Desalination chamberInfluent6.13 ± 0.081.51 ± 0.212.34 ± 0.16
Effluent6.04 ± 0.010.27 ± 0.182.18 ± 0.02
Cathode chamberInfluent6.92 ± 0.0418.67 ± 0.840.97 ± 0.05
Effluent7.82 ± 0.043.98 ± 0.201.13 ± 0.03

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, C.; Lu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J. Electricity Generation, Salt and Nitrogen Removal and Microbial Community in Aircathode Microbial Desalination Cell for Saline-Alkaline Soil-Washing Water Treatment. Water 2020, 12, 2257. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082257

AMA Style

Xu C, Lu J, Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Zhang J. Electricity Generation, Salt and Nitrogen Removal and Microbial Community in Aircathode Microbial Desalination Cell for Saline-Alkaline Soil-Washing Water Treatment. Water. 2020; 12(8):2257. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082257

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Chenglong, Jialei Lu, Zhimiao Zhao, Yinjiang Zhang, and Jiawei Zhang. 2020. "Electricity Generation, Salt and Nitrogen Removal and Microbial Community in Aircathode Microbial Desalination Cell for Saline-Alkaline Soil-Washing Water Treatment" Water 12, no. 8: 2257. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082257

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop