Assessment of Flood Forecast Products for a Coupled Tributary-Coastal Model
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
See attached file.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
The paper is well written and the addressed problem is valuable. I have two minor comments and believe addressing them could further improve the quality of the paper.
- It was not clear how the RDHM and CoSMoS are coupled. If they are not fully two-way coupled, how is the data transferred between the two software? How did the authors guarantee the convergence of the computation?
- As mentioned in the manuscript, RDHM is likely to be replaced by NWM in the future. Is there a plan to replace RDHM by NWM?
Author Response
Please see attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 3 Report
Please see attached PDF for comments.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 3 Report
I appreciate the attention that the authors gave to the revision. They have thoughtfully and adequately addressed the comments from the initial review. I recommend the paper for publication in its current form.