Next Article in Journal
Impeller Optimization in Crossflow Hydraulic Turbines
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Controlled Drainage and Subirrigation on Water Quality in the Red River Valley
Previous Article in Special Issue
Downscaling Regional Hydrological Forecast for Operational Use in Local Early Warning: HYPE Models in the Sirba River
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Assessment of Flood Forecast Products for a Coupled Tributary-Coastal Model

Water 2021, 13(3), 312; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030312
by Robert Cifelli 1,*, Lynn E. Johnson 1,2, Jungho Kim 1,2, Tim Coleman 3, Greg Pratt 4, Liv Herdman 5, Rosanne Martyr-Koller 5, Juliette A. FinziHart 5, Li Erikson 5, Patrick Barnard 5 and Michael Anderson 6
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Water 2021, 13(3), 312; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030312
Submission received: 1 December 2020 / Revised: 3 January 2021 / Accepted: 12 January 2021 / Published: 27 January 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is well written and the addressed problem is valuable. I have two minor comments and believe addressing them could further improve the quality of the paper.

  1. It was not clear how the RDHM and CoSMoS are coupled. If they are not fully two-way coupled, how is the data transferred between the two software? How did the authors guarantee the convergence of the computation?
  2. As mentioned in the manuscript, RDHM is likely to be replaced by NWM in the future. Is there a plan to replace RDHM by NWM?

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Please see attached PDF for comments.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

I appreciate the attention that the authors gave to the revision. They have thoughtfully and adequately addressed the comments from the initial review. I recommend the paper for publication in its current form.

Back to TopTop