Next Article in Journal
Water Footprint, Blue Water Scarcity, and Economic Water Productivity of Irrigated Crops in Peshawar Basin, Pakistan
Previous Article in Journal
Cyber—Physical Attack Detection in Water Distribution Systems with Temporal Graph Convolutional Neural Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Calibration Parameter Selection on Flash Flood Simulation for Small to Medium Catchments with MISDc-2L Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Understanding Uncertainty in Probabilistic Floodplain Mapping in the Time of Climate Change

Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S4L8, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2021, 13(9), 1248; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091248
Submission received: 30 March 2021 / Revised: 22 April 2021 / Accepted: 26 April 2021 / Published: 29 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Flash Flood Forecasting)

Abstract

An integrated framework was employed to develop probabilistic floodplain maps, taking into account hydrologic and hydraulic uncertainties under climate change impacts. To develop the maps, several scenarios representing the individual and compounding effects of the models’ input and parameters uncertainty were defined. Hydrologic model calibration and validation were performed using a Dynamically Dimensioned Search algorithm. A generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method was used for quantifying uncertainty. To draw on the potential benefits of the proposed methodology, a flash-flood-prone urban watershed in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada, was selected. The developed floodplain maps were updated considering climate change impacts on the input uncertainty with rainfall Intensity–Duration–Frequency (IDF) projections of RCP8.5. The results indicated that the hydrologic model input poses the most uncertainty to floodplain delineation. Incorporating climate change impacts resulted in the expansion of the potential flood area and an increase in water depth. Comparison between stationary and non-stationary IDFs showed that the flood probability is higher when a non-stationary approach is used. The large inevitable uncertainty associated with floodplain mapping and increased future flood risk under climate change imply a great need for enhanced flood modeling techniques and tools. The probabilistic floodplain maps are beneficial for implementing risk management strategies and land-use planning.
Keywords: probabilistic floodplain mapping; uncertainty quantification; model calibration; climate change probabilistic floodplain mapping; uncertainty quantification; model calibration; climate change

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zahmatkesh, Z.; Han, S.; Coulibaly, P. Understanding Uncertainty in Probabilistic Floodplain Mapping in the Time of Climate Change. Water 2021, 13, 1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091248

AMA Style

Zahmatkesh Z, Han S, Coulibaly P. Understanding Uncertainty in Probabilistic Floodplain Mapping in the Time of Climate Change. Water. 2021; 13(9):1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091248

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zahmatkesh, Zahra, Shasha Han, and Paulin Coulibaly. 2021. "Understanding Uncertainty in Probabilistic Floodplain Mapping in the Time of Climate Change" Water 13, no. 9: 1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091248

APA Style

Zahmatkesh, Z., Han, S., & Coulibaly, P. (2021). Understanding Uncertainty in Probabilistic Floodplain Mapping in the Time of Climate Change. Water, 13(9), 1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091248

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop