3.5.1. Correlation Analysis between “L-SP” and Water Quality
Figure 17 displays the Spearman coefficient analyses between the area proportions of composite land use types at the topographic slope sites and the TP and TN concentrations in the 21 monitoring units of the HBA watershed. The land use types were forest land, dry farmland, paddy land, grassland and construction land, and the topographic slope sites were valley, gentle slope, steep slope, and ridge. Since the distributions of paddy land, grassland and construction land are small on ridges, their correlations with ridges are not discussed. The land use types corresponding to the different slope positions were superimposed to obtain
Figure 18.
During 2016–2018, positive correlations were reported between forest land in valleys and TP (0.473 and 0.598 in the flood and dry seasons, respectively) and between forest land in valley and TN in the flood season (0.472). From 2013 to 2015, the forest land on gentle slopes was correlated with TP in the flood and dry seasons (−0.749 and −0.678, respectively) and with TN (−0.809 and −0.693, respectively). The forest land on steep slope was correlated with TP in the flood and dry seasons (−0.702 and −0.661, respectively) and with TN (−0.64 and −0.681, respectively). From 2016 to 2018, the correlation between TN and forest land on steep slopes was −0.508 in the flood season and −0.512 in the dry seasons. The correlations between ridge forest land and TP in the flood and dry seasons were −0.788 and −0.575, respectively, in 2013–2015 and −0.682 and −0.753, respectively, in 2016–2018. Moreover, the correlations between ridge forest land and TN in the flood and dry seasons were −0.815 and −0.740, respectively, in 2013–2015, and −0.788 and −0.797, respectively, in 2016–2018. All of these negative correlations are highly significant. The most stable correlation was that between TP and TN. The convergence of TP and TN was prominent in valley forest. In ridge forest, steep forest and gentle-slope forest, purification has been promoted by intercepting and blocking of TP and TN. The purification intensity was highest on ridge forest land, intermediate on gentle-slope forest land, and lowest on steep-slope forest land.
From 2013 to 2015, the correlations between valley dry farmland and TP in the flood and dry seasons were 0.627 and 0.722, respectively, and those between valley dry farmland and TN in the flood and dry seasons were 0.628 and 0.744, respectively. The TP and TN correlations were both significant. From 2016 to 2018, valley dry farmland was significantly correlated with TP (−0.616) during the flood season, whereas dry farmland was highly correlated with TP during the flood and dry seasons (−0.785 and −0.815, respectively) and significantly correlated with TN during the flood and dry seasons (−0.626 and (−0.662, respectively)). No obvious relationship between TP and TN was observed on steep-slope dry farmland. Over both periods, the correlation coefficients between ridge dry farmland and TP and TN were significant in the flood and dry seasons. The Spearman coefficients show that when the TP and TN concentrations are high, the valleys play a dominant role and the pollutant-convergence effect of dry farmland in the valley is prominent. In the different sloped dry farmland management methods, gentle slope land can take soil and water conservation tillage measures (e.g., conservation tillage or covering measures). With the increase in the slope, slope terrace, contour shrub-grass belt (hedgerow), and other short slope engineering measures can be adopted. When the slope increases further, terraced fields are generally used. Steep slope according to the “law of soil and water conservation “needs to return farmland to forest, construct slope soil, and conserve water in the forest.
Among relationships between paddy land on different topographic positions and the TP and TN concentrations, only valley paddy land was significantly related to TP (−0.635 and (−0.528 in the flood and dry seasons, respectively) from 2016 to 2018, and only gently sloped paddy land was related to TN (−0.455) during the dry season of 2013–2015. No obvious relationship appeared between topographic-slope compound paddy land and TP and TN concentrations, possibly due to the fact that paddy land is primarily distributed in valley areas, the distribution areas of gentle slopes, steep slopes and ridges are small, and planting activities are strongly dominated by human beings.
From 2013 to 2015, grassland was positively correlated with TP (0.635 and 0.680 in the flood and dry seasons, respectively) and TN (0.578 and 0.707 in the flood and dry seasons, respectively). From 2016 to 2018, gentle-slope grassland was negatively associated with TP (−0.508) in the flood season and steep-slope grassland was negatively associated with TP in both the flood and dry seasons (−0.538 and (−0.490, respectively). On other complex grasslands at different topographic positions, the correlations with TP and TN were mostly negative but insignificant. Compound grasslands with different topographic positions are affected by ecological-land use and exert a weak purification effect on TP and TN concentrations.
From 2013 to 2015, highly significant correlations appeared between valley construction land and TP in both flood and dry seasons (0.745 and 0.785, respectively) and TN (0.855 and 0.785, respectively). Construction land on gentle slopes during the flood and dry seasons was positively correlated with TP (0.679 and 0.675, respectively, in 2013–2015 and 0.645 and 0.694, respectively, in 2016–2018) and with TN (0.521 and 0.534, respectively, in 2013–2015 and 0.564 and 0.593, respectively, in 2016–2018). From 2016 to 2018, steep-slope construction land was positively correlated with TP in the flood and dry seasons (0.510 and 0.463, respectively). On different topographic positions of each land use type, composite construction land was positively associated with TN and TP concentrations, reflecting the prominent characteristics of urban use. Therefore, construction land is an occurrence place of high TP and TN concentrations and must be targeted in pollution control strategies.
In general, for different slope land management, infiltration should be increased and runoff should be reduced in the valley. Soil and water conservation tillage measures can be adopted on gentle slope (e.g., contour strip tillage). With the increase in slope, we can adopt contour shrub grass band (hedgerow) and other short slope engineering. Steep slope needs to return farmland to forest, the construction of slope soil and water conservation forest.
3.5.2. Redundancy Analysis of Topographic-Slope Compound Land Use Types and TP and TN Concentration
In the redundancy analysis of area proportion of each land use type on TP and TN concentrations (
Figure 14), the primary explainers of water quality were forest land, dry farmland, and construction land. Moreover, when compound land use types on different topographic slopes were correlated against TP and TN concentration, the topographic position obviously affected water quality. In the analysis of this subsection, the contribution rates of different topographic positions are combined with three land use types (
Figure 19,
Table 7). Since the distribution of ridge construction land was extremely small, it is not discussed here. Analyzing the land uses and TP and TN redundancies of topographic slopes from 2013 to 2015 and from 2016 to 2018, the interpretation rate of TP and TN was highest (50.90%) on gentle-slope forest land, followed by steep-slope forest land. In the dry farmland category, the high pollution output from 2013 to 2015 was primarily explained by TP and TN in valley dry farmland (explanation rate = 79.12%). When the nitrogen and phosphorus output decreased from 2016 to 2018, the explanation rate of gently sloping dry farmland to water quality was 22.11%. Among the construction land types, valley construction land most obviously increased the TP and TN concentrations, yielding the highest interpretation rate (88.70%).
To summarize, on the topographic slope scale, the land use type reflects human activities and the composite land use of topographic slopes makes higher contributions to TP and TN pollution than the topographic slopes themselves. Valleys occupy the lower part of the basin that collects the pollutants from steep and gentle slopes and upper and middle reaches of the basin. Therefore, valleys act as pollution sinks. When the pollution concentration is large, the cumulative interpretation rate of land use type is obviously higher for valleys than for other topographic slopes. On steep slopes and ridges, where the effects of human activities are small, the cumulative interpretation rates of different land use types on TP and TN are low. Pollution prevention and control can be achieved by comprehensively analyzing the effect of the topographic position of compound land use on nutrient migration through the watershed. In addition to analyzing the influence of land use and topographic slope position on TP and TN pollution, the source control area and pollution purification area in the basin must be systematically identified.