Changes in the Stability Landscape of a River Basin by Anthropogenic Droughts
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
This study aims to analyze anthropogenic droughts and the changes provoked to the stability landscapes of the streamflow system of the Rio Grand River basin.
The topic is interesting. Still, some issues should be addressed.
Please follows the template for References. The names of the journals must be abbreviated and the ISBN of the books must not appear. s, INSTITUTO POL ITÉCNICO NACIONAL should not be written only in capitals. The online articles must be followed to the link where they can be found.
The introduction is well written, emphasizing the novelty of this approach. Still, it would be recommended to refer to other fields where the proposed methodology has been used to give the reader an idea about the extent of the method's application.
Line 173 - It must be R2 not R2.
Line 174 - 178 - This information should appear in Results and Discussion or Conclusion. Please move it.
Line 182 - it must be a dot instead of ;
Line 188-191. Not always the result of such a transformation is a Gaussian variable.
Please indicate the best pdf fit for your data series. What alternative pdf-s did you choose"? What software did you use choose? Please proved some charts to see the best fit and one of its alternatives. Please provide the corresponding p-values in the KS test.
Line 491. What kind of measures do you expect? Please refer to some of them/
Author Response
"Please see the attachment."
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
Dear authors, I have minor comments and suggestions. They are given in the attached file.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 3 Report
The overall manuscript is well written and has discussed the drought incidents during the era of the Anthropocene. The Abstract is clear and concise. The literature review is sufficient. The methodology is well explained. The study area and corresponding data are discussed. Results seem reasonable and may be replicated by readers.
This manuscript may be accepted.
Author Response
We are pleased that the reviewer believes our study meets the criteria, thank you.
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Dear Authors,
Thank you for taking into account our recommendations.
Even though the article has been improved, the references are not yet in the correct format. Please follow the journal requirements.
