Next Article in Journal
Hydrologic Performance of Low Impact Developments in a Cold Climate
Next Article in Special Issue
An Experimental Study of Roughness Elements to Design Fixed-Bed Hydraulic Model—A Step-by-Step Process and an Application in Vietnam
Previous Article in Journal
Degradation of Emerging Pollutants by Photocatalysis: Radiation Modeling and Kinetics in Packed-Bed Reactors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Two-Phase Flow Modeling for Bed Erosion by a Plane Jet Impingement
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effects of Nonlinearity on Velocity, Acceleration and Pressure Gradient in Free-Stream Zone of Solitary Wave over Horizontal Bed—An Experimental Study

Water 2022, 14(22), 3609; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223609
by Chang Lin 1,*, Ming-Jer Kao 1, James Yang 2,3, Juan-Ming Yuan 4 and Shih-Chun Hsieh 5
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Water 2022, 14(22), 3609; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223609
Submission received: 15 September 2022 / Revised: 31 October 2022 / Accepted: 4 November 2022 / Published: 9 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Experimental Hydraulics, Coast and Ocean Hydrodynamics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper presentation is well and experimental results will be sound and these results will be referenced for several numerical studies.

- First, the authors should add several validation tests.

- Second,  the authors should add numerical simulations for their results. 

Many numerical simulations for wave paddle of solitary wave are done, you can cite those studies like:

‎Incompressible ‎smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations on free surface flows AM Aly

International Journal of Industrial Mathematics (IJIM) 7 (1), 99-    

- Third, the quality of Fig. 12 is not clear.  It should be modified. 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

1. Abstract needs to be revised to include brief on results and investigated parameters.

2. Introduction section needs to be expanded to include discussion on prediction of the free surface elevation and kinematic features of a solitary wave traveling on a horizontal bed.

3. Research objectives are missing from the paper.

4. Include the uncertainty analysis of the HPIV technique.

5. Description on wave flume generation should have been included. Include the wave maker set-up.

6. There are numerous occasions in the paper that referencing to your previous publications of [15,17,18,21,22,24–26] - what is most significant difference of the current paper to those?

7. Time-dependent results are mostly discussed. Averaged quantities should have been provided as well for comparison.

8. Discuss how the non-dimensional quantities are obtained.

9. Figure 12 needs a better resolution (focused images).

10. How boundary layers are determined?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop