Next Article in Journal
Estimation of Applicability of Soil Model for Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) Plantations in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China
Previous Article in Journal
Mitigation of Hydroelastic Responses in a Very Large Floating Structure by a Connected Vertical Porous Flexible Barrier
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Geospatial Assessment of Ground Water Quality and Associated Health Problems in the Western Region of India

by
Rani Singh
1,†,
Pallavi Upreti
2,*,†,
Khaled S. Allemailem
3,*,
Ahmad Almatroudi
3,
Arshad Husain Rahmani
3 and
Ghadah M. Albalawi
3,4
1
Department of Geography, Subodh (Autonomous) Post Graduate College, Jaipur 302007, India
2
Department of Geography, SDM Government Post Graduate College, Dehradun 248001, India
3
Department of Medical Laboratories, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Laboratory and Blood Bank, King Fahd Specialist Hospital, Tabuk 47717, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Water 2022, 14(3), 296; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14030296
Submission received: 9 December 2021 / Revised: 8 January 2022 / Accepted: 10 January 2022 / Published: 19 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Water Quality and Contamination)

Abstract

:
Groundwater constitutes a significant component of freshwater resources in India being vital for its economy and domestic water security. The quantity, quality and accessibility of water resources forms the basis of balanced socio-economic development and its optimum utilization cannot be sustained unless its quality is assessed. The current study tries to access the quality and suitability of groundwater for drinking purposes in western drier parts of India in the state of Rajasthan. Based on collected data, selected hydro-geochemical parameters, the quality of water has been determined and Water Quality Index (WQI) have been prepared using GIS applications. Applying the Inverse Distance Weighting method, WQI values for 89 villages in the area have been computed, which ranged between 71.23 and 447.39. While 68% of the region had “poor water quality”, only 32% is sustained as ‘good water’ for consumption. The fluoride content ranging between 1.66 and 8.60 mg/L and TDS > 1000 mg/L with average pH levels > 7 (8–9 pH) were found to be very high amongst all the 12 water quality parameters taken for the study. The northeastern region with a WQI value of >250 had the worst water quality. Furthermore, the existing water quality is also examined for influencing two water borne diseases, i.e., gastroenteritis and fluorosis in the region. The study thus establishes that the majority of groundwater in the region is beyond the permissible safer consumption limits, and a large population of the region, which is directly dependent on groundwater sources, is prone to water borne health hazards. A significantly high correlation was observed between Specific Water Quality Parameters in the region and prevalence of gastroenteritis (and fluorosis diseases with R2 = 0.530 and R2 = 0.813, respectively).

1. Introduction

Groundwater is an indispensable renewable resource found on earth, significant for supporting habitat, maintaining hydrological balance as well as sustaining human needs [1,2]. It constitutes crucial components of freshwater resources globally, fulfilling water requirements of millions of living organisms. Water also forms an integral part of many other natural resources too; hence, optimum utilization of related natural resources remains uncertain with degrading water quality. In nature, the quality of groundwater is believed to be cleaner from surface water, since it is recharged, recycled and filtered through biological, natural processes which keeps it free from contamination and pollution [3]. The quality of groundwater is subjected to various factors like forms of water, quantity of atmospheric precipitation, recharged water quality, inland/surface water, physio-chemical properties of soil and several subsurface geo-chemical processes [4,5]. The chemical alteration in the groundwater also relies on factors such as duration of residence, seepage of contaminated surface water, salinity and several anthropogenic causes [6,7,8,9]. The quality, quantity and accessibility of groundwater is requisite for holistic, sustained socio economic and environmental development since it caters to the water needs of sectors across spheres of life.
In India, groundwater is considered the most dependable source as agriculture and drinking water demands are heavily met by it [10,11]. The main source of replenishable groundwater recharge in India comes from rainfall which accounts for nearly 67% of the total recharge annually. However, the recharge of groundwater is greatly affected by seasonal, temporal and spatial variation in annual rainfall, manifested through vast spatial variability in the availability and quality of groundwater in India [12]. Increasing population requirements, urbanization, industrialization, modern agricultural practices and non-uniform water extraction practices have accelerated degradation, depletion and contamination of groundwater resources, which have raised concerns regarding its quality and quantity. Unfortunately, water contamination and degrading quality of groundwater sources have posed severe threat to human health also wherein 80% of water borne diseases in developing countries like India can be associated with appalling drinking water quality and unhygienic conditions [13,14,15,16].
The depleting water quality has also been observed to impact the activity of microbial pathogens, which in turn can affect the prevalence and transmission dynamics of water-borne diseases to a greater extent [17]. This is evident through falling groundwater levels, contamination of aquifers, and increasing prevalence of water borne diseases over the past few decades. Contaminated aquifers, shrinking water sources and growing water scarcity problems are destabilizing India’s capacity to ensure farm productivity, economic growth, safeguard public health, secure social stability and maintain environment functionality [18]. Since water quality is indicative of environmental fitness, and is closely woven with various socio-economic aspects. Its qualitative assessment is therefore, assertive to ensure environmental sustenance, long-term viability and water security for humans as well [19,20].
Appropriate water quality assessment and health management measures need reliable quantitative information. GIS has evolved as an efficient tool for assimilating, analyzing and exhibiting spatial data which can be utilized for numerous monitoring, planning and resource management purposes [3]. With the ability to use spatial data according to desired needs and in diversified domains within integrated environment, GIS has emerged as a significant platform for resource management studies. Its accuracy in exploratory data analysis, its visualization, as well as model building capacity has enabled it to address multidimensional resource management challenges including water [21]. It can be used to analyze spatial distribution of groundwater, problems associated with its quality, assessing its vulnerability to pollution, distribution of associated diseases and at-risk populations and to facilitate targeted interventions for resource management. It also provides an ideal platform for converging information in relation to the environment and population aspects and manipulating spatial data into different forms as per the geo-social requirements. Therefore, GIS can be seen as the most appropriate multispectral spatial analysis tool, which can be applied in almost all areas (even real time data analysis) where spatial information has to be retrieved and analyzed [22]. The study therefore also attempts to highlight the potential of geographical information system based geo-statistical techniques in assessing groundwater quality of the region and investigating the water-borne diseases susceptibility based on water quality indexing [17].
Furthermore, the study also intends to investigate the association of drinkable water quality and its influence on human health in the region, with respect to two diseases in particular, i.e., gastroenteritis and fluorosis. The study may therefore prove beneficial in assessing existing gross water resource quality and its suitability for human consumption. In addition, it aims to identify the association between existing water quality and water borne diseases/ prevailing health hazards in the given or similar geographical environment [23].

2. Methodology

2.1. Study Area

The research area for this particular study covers Phagi Block, located in the southwestern region of Jaipur district, in the state of Rajasthan (India) located between latitudes 26°30′22″ N to 26°43′15″ N and longitudes 75°23′56″ to 75°42′35″ E. It is surrounded in the South by Tonk district and occupies an area of 146,790 ha (Figure 1). The region has a mild slope with clay loam soil and semi-arid topography. The region has high relative temperatures throughout the year with dry arid weather conditions. The average annual precipitation is around 640 mm with summer maximum which makes availability of surface water shorter and existence of non-perennial river systems. Due to scarce availability of surface water, more than 50% of the people in the region rely on groundwater resources for their needs [24,25,26]. However, with degrading water sources, the predominance of water borne diseases can be observed in the region [27,28]. Two parameters (Fluoride and Total Dissolved Solids) were found to have an increase in concentrations, due to which study area is more prone to diseases like fluorosis and gastroenteritis. The concentration of the elements in drinking water has been assessed as per the permissible limits set by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS,10500-2003) [29].

2.2. Process and Method

The cross-sectional study includes groundwater sample collection from well sites, primary and secondary data related to sanitation, drinking water availability, diseases, etc. The random stratified sampling method has been used to choose the primary households for the study. Water quality data for the year 2018–2019 have been collected from Ground Water Department, Jaipur (India) for 89 villages in the area and additional water sample were collected from randomly chosen 16 well sites in the area at a regular interval during the same time period (Figure 2). All water samples were collected in thoroughly rinsed and sterilized bottles and were then assessed through chemical laboratory analysis based on twelve (12) physio-chemical parameters for drinking purposes as delineated by the Bureau of Indian Standards [29]. Based on this, the WQI was calculated using Weighted Arithmetic Index Method [30,31,32] for each of the 89 villages in the area. Several groundwater characteristics, especially its chemical characteristics, have been chronicled around the world [33,34,35,36,37]. By preparing the Water Quality Index (WQI) or Groundwater Quality Index (GWQI based on the collected groundwater samples and data) [38], the overall water quality of the region has been assessed.
GIS platforms and geo-spatial analysis techniques have also been used to encapsulate the spatial variation in groundwater quality of Phagi Tehsil, Rajasthan (India). A spatial database of the study has been prepared with village boundary maps, and point vector files were generated using village Water Quality Index data of 89 Villages of the area and GPS location of 16 well sites in the region. These points have been used as input in spatial interpolation using the IDW method in the ArcGIS 9.3 platform. The method evaluates the value of cells based on the estimated average value of sample data points in the neighborhood of each processing cell in the GIS environment. Close proximity of the point towards the centre determines more influence of the value in the averaging process. The technique has been used in several studies for preparing/presenting spatial distribution of the attributes using GIS tools [39,40,41]. Once the WQI is prepared, the values are thereafter classified into 5 quality categories ranging from ‘excellent’ to ‘unsuitable’ water quality and WQI index maps have been prepared. Using overlay analysis, several data sets have been merged and reclassified to acquire the desired outcome maps to facilitate spatial analysis of water resources in the area.
Epidemiological data focusing on gastroenteritis and fluorosis have been collected from ‘Patient Record form’ available at 5 (five) primary Health centers (PHC) located in the assessment area namely—Phagi, Madhorajpura, Chauru, Renwal, Nimera PHCs. In addition, 8–12 villages in the area were served by each PHC; therefore, all the villages under one PHC were dissolved to form a single polygon conforming the service area of the respective PHC in the selected study region. Therefore, the (PHC’s) are depicted by 5 polygons—Phagi, Madhorajpur, Chauru, Renwal, Nimera—in the region while showcasing disease prevalence of fluorosis and Gastroenteritis diseases. The chemical concentrations of the entire sample lying in a PHC have been averaged and association between specific disease incidence and level of relevant physio-chemical parameters in the groundwater have been quantified using correlation and linear regression analysis. The overall methodological design adopted for the research is represented in the flow diagram in Figure 3.

2.3. Water Quality Index Generation for Drinking Purposes

Knowledge of several parameters associated with the quality of water is essential to interpret or make accurate prediction of its quality and suitability in any area [42]. WQI has emerged to be a very efficient, effective and beneficial method in determining the overall quality of water. Assessment of Water Quality Index requires the conversion of large, spatially complex water quality data into conveniently understandable information which can be applied to the number of resource management practices. Therefore, WQI has been widely used as an indicator of groundwater quality in any area [3] WQI has been determined for sample locations on the basis of twelve (12) physio-chemical parameters of water quality for human consumption as directed by Bureau of Indian Standards [29] (Table 1).
In the study, the Weighted Arithmetic Index Method [43] has been applied to calculate WQI. Here, the water quality parameters are multiplied by their weighting factor and thereafter calculated using simple arithmetic means [44,45]. Parameters like TDS, fluoride, nitrate and sulphate have been allocated the maximum weight, i.e., 5 (five) due to their predominance and high relative presence in the water samples collected.
The following three steps have been used for determining WQI:
(1)
Step 1: Each of the given 12 parameters has been assigned a weight (Wi) according to its relative presence in water for assessing the overall water quality particularly for human consumption (Table 2).
(2)
Step 2: By applying the following equation, the relative weight (Wi) has been calculated
W i = w i   i = 1 n w i
where:
  • Wi = Relative weight;
  • wi = Weight of each parameter;
  • n = The number of parameters.
(3)
Step 3: Based on the guideline laid down by BIS 10500 (1991), every individual parameter is given a specific value by dividing its concentration in an individual water sample by its corresponding standard designated by BIS, and the obtained results have been multiplied by 100 to generate a quality rating scale (qi)
qi = (Ci × Si) × 100
where,
  • qi = Quality rating;
  • Ci = Concentration of each chemical parameter in each sample in mg/L;
  • Si = The water standard for drinking for each chemical part.
For each individual parameter, the Sub Index (SI) is calculated first, which is thereafter used to determine the final Water Quality Index, based on the formula given below:
SIi = Wi × qi
W = ∑SIi
where:
  • SIi = Sub index of ith parameter.
Based on the application of these steps, the Water Quality Index values are calculated which range from 71.23 (lowest) to 447.39 (highest). These values are further categorized into 5 classes (Table 3) to evaluate the condition of water quality within the region and for generating the water quality spatial distribution map.

2.4. Map Generation

The obtained non-spatial (attribute) and spatial data are merged together for generating WQI maps, spatial distribution maps, etc. Chorochromatic thematic maps have been prepared to demarcate areas displaying spatial variation in water quality, concentration of chemicals and water borne diseases in the area using the GIS platform.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Evaluating Water Quality for Drinking Purposes

The assessment of groundwater quality is imperative for inspecting the usability and suitability of water for different purposes especially for human consumption. The qualitative evaluation of water in the area has been conducted based on the analysis of several physiochemical characteristics and WQI assessment. It depends on several characteristics like biological, physical, and chemical components to evaluate water’s suitability for human consumption and other purposes [46]. Based on an index number, a single score is obtained through summation of various parameters associated with water quality. Therefore, WQI is indicative of groundwater quality in general as well as in determining its suitability for human consumption in particular.

3.1.1. Levels of Primary Physicochemical Parameters Determining the Overall Quality of Water in the Study Area

  • pH Level is an important functional parameter of water quality. The optimum pH level standard requirement should fall within the range of 6.5 to 8.5 [3]. However, as per BIS standards, the upper permissible pH level limit for drinking purposes has been standardized to 8.5 pH value with overall range of 6 to 9. While the villages in the western, southwestern region of Phagi like Nimera and Chauru had pH ranging between 6 to 7, it increases on moving from the southwestern region to Central and Northern regions with villages like Phagi and Renwal, having maximum pH between 8 to 9, which is slightly alkaline in nature. However, the pH values of the region are observed to be within permissible limits of BIS (i.e., between 6 to 9).
  • Fluoride (F): Fluoride is a monatomic anion found naturally in water with the chemical formula F⁻. Fluoride is primarily sourced from water in the human diet. Therefore, much of the difference in total fluoride intake is dependent on the compositional variability of water [47]. The existence of fluoride in groundwater is generally dissolved from geological formation [48]. While excessive intake of fluoride is often associated with dental fluorosis, excessive exposure to fluoride may lead to crippled skeletal fluorosis [49]. However, in the case of fluoride, the excess and deficiency both can be detrimental to human health; therefore, its optimum consumption is essential for balanced growth. The optimal intake of fluoride accepted widely ranges from 0.05 to 0.07 mg/kg of the total body weight [50]. It was observed that the Phagi region has an overall higher concentration of fluoride, which ranged between 1.66 to 8.60 mg/L, and was way above the BSI prescribed standards (fluoride 1.0 mg/L) for drinking water in India. The fluoride concentration was highest in the Central and North Eastern region with more than a 3.90 mg/L concentration. More than 70% of the study area is badly affected by fluoride in drinking water (Figure 4A).
  • Total Dissolved Solids (TDS): refers to the overall accumulation of total dissolved mineral compositions in water. The levels of TDS in water depend on many natural, physiological factors, rock structures, rainfall, soil type, etc. as well as human induced factors like mining, increased discharge of solids into the water, water extraction levels, etc. [3]. The study shows higher TDS against the permissible limit of 500 mg/L, allocated by BIS. In fact, except for a few villages in the southern part of the region (Nimera village) which have TDS below 500 mg/L, most of the villages in the Central, Western and Northern part of the Block, show a very high concentration of TDS ranging more than 1500 mg/L. Almost 70% of the region’s water is found “unsuitable for drinking purposes” owing to its high TDS concentrations > 1000 mg/L. High TDS concentration pockets are located along the central, northeastern and southwestern part within the region (Figure 4B).

3.1.2. Water Quality Index (WQI) Analysis

Since WQI is a summative compilation of several biophysical characteristics of water, it is indicative of its holistic quality. The computed WQI values for the whole study region range between 71.23 to 448.39 with overall higher WQI values and high spatial variability. Low WQI distribution, i.e., below 100 WQI value (synonymous to ‘excellent water ‘quality) is observed in the southern, southwestern region (Chauru, Nimera region). The value increases on moving towards the central, northern and northeastern regions (Phagi, Renwal, Madhorajpura), where the WQI values exceeds the 250 range and is considered of “Poor” to “Very Poor” quality, and inappropriate for human consumption. Certain village pockets even had >400 WQI values which were categorized as regions having water ‘Unsuitable for Drinking’. Nearly 66% of the samples from the region either were in Poor, Very Poor or Water Unsuitable for Drinking category as per WQI. In fact, 18.57% samples with > 400 WQI values fall under “Water unsuitable for drinking “category and only 31.42% samples with (less than) < 100 WQI values were considered of “Good Water Quality”. Areas with WQI values in between 300 to 400 indicate that water should be used with caution, particularly where the prevalence of water borne health hazards is higher (Figure 5).
The analysis, therefore, reveals high spatial variations in water quality within the study area. While the central and northeastern regions of the study area show very high values (>400) on the Water Quality Index, indicating that the water is “unfit” for drinking, the southern regions have lower values (<100) showing that water is suitable for drinking. The most “unsuitable water for drinking” was observed in Phagi and Renwal regions with highest values on WQI index exceeding >400 with 402.03 and 404.07 WQI values respectively).

3.2. Water Quality and Disease Prevalence

The prevalence of the waterborne diseases can be observed globally, with predominance in developing countries. The contamination of community water systems and outbreak of water borne diseases have the potential to affect large population consumer groups [51]. Water is considered safe for drinking and domestic purposes, when it is not only pleasant to taste, but also free from harmful chemical and pathogenic agents [52]. Accessibility to clean drinking water significantly affects poor and vulnerable people, especially those living in developing regions of the world [53].
In recent years, higher dependence on groundwater resources for domestic as well as economic purposes have led to constant degradation in quality of water with subsequent prevalence of water borne health hazards. Microbial contamination is very common in many developing countries affecting all water sources including piped [54]. The assessment of disease prevalence and concentration in the area is established on the disease case record data of fluorosis and gastroenteritis collected from five Primary Health Centers of the region (Table 4).

3.2.1. Fluorosis

Fluoride, which is primarily sourced from water, has beneficial and detrimental effects on human health [55]. While its excess consumption/exposure is related to dental and skeletal fluorosis, its deficiency may cause tooth decay and osteoporosis [56,57]. Therefore, optimal intake of Fluoride is essential for the balanced development of human beings. Its intake through water plays a vital role in accessing its net consumption adequacy in many settings [58,59]. The health hazards associated with fluoride are often based on either contamination of groundwater with excess fluoride (F), with profusion occurring from geological crust or consumption of unsafe (untreated, unfiltered) groundwater having higher content of fluoride by the communities generally drawn through open wells, hand pumps and tube wells [60].
Communities consuming safe water (F < 1.0 mg/L) have comparatively lesser chances of fluorosis, as compared to the ones consuming water with higher fluoride content (F > 1.0 mg/L). The study area has a very high concentration of fluoride ranging between 1.66 to 8.60 mg/L and has a higher concentration of people suffering from fluorosis. The data collected from the PHC’s of the study region reveal that disease samples collected from northern, northeastern and central regions show a higher concentration of fluorosis with Phagi and Madhorajpura PHC’s having the highest percentage of 3.87% and 3.90, respectively, of the total fluorosis cases in the region in 2018 (Figure 6A). In fact, Phagi PHC is most affected by fluorosis followed by Renwal. The higher concentration of fluorosis cases can be linked to a higher fluoride concentration in water in the region. The value of R2 between fluorosis and fluoride is observed to be 0.81, (Figure 6B) reflecting significantly higher positive association between the prevalent disease (i.e., fluorosis) and presence of fluoride (chemical parameter taken) in the groundwater of the region.

3.2.2. Gastroenteritis

Nearly 90% of diarrheal deaths worldwide can be associated with inadequate sanitation, poor hygiene and overall unsafe water consumption practices [61]. The pathogenic microorganisms, their toxic exudates, and other contaminants together may cause conditions leading to gastroenteritis. Several incidences of viral gastroenteritis outbreaks, related to unsafe drinking practices, consumption of unsafe water and exposure to contaminated water have been reported worldwide [62,63,64]. The drinking water available in the region has low water quality; therefore, the prevalence for gastroenteritis is widespread in the region, with pockets of high concentration. The maximum concentration of gastroenteritis cases was observed in the northeastern section of the region in the given year. Spatial distribution of the diseases reveals that the highest incidences of gastroenteritis were reported from PHC Renwal (10.03) followed by Chauru (4.85) and Madhorajpura (4.52) within the region (Table 4 and Figure 7). Statistical computation identifies the value of R2 as 0.530, which highlights a positive association between gastroenteritis disease and an existing chemical parameter (TDS) concentration in groundwater (Figure 7B).
Different parameters of water quality with respect to disease prevalence i.e., fluorosis and gastroenteritis were found to be strongly interrelated within the area with the exception of small pockets in southern and southeastern regions. A high correlation was observed between disease prevalence and 12 water chemical parameters, with two parameters (Fluoride & TDS) showing maximum correlation.
Therefore, a visual comparison of the hydro-chemical concentration map with a disease distribution map indicates that the areas having a high concentration of specific chemicals exceeding the standard limit prescribed by BIS corresponds with the areas of high disease incidence (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Regression analysis further validates the fact, establishing a positive correlation between existing water quality and prevalence of selected water borne diseases in the particular area. Therefore, a strong association between concentration of specific physio-chemical parameters in groundwater and prevalence of respective diseases can be observed in the region.

4. Conclusions

The systematic study carried out using spatial analysis tools on the GIS platform to assess the chemical characteristics of drinking water quality on health concludes that deteriorating water quality is a major problem in the Phagi Block located in Jaipur, Rajasthan (India). The integration of various thematic layers using ArcGIS 9.3 GIS software has proved beneficial in determining groundwater suitability for drinking purpose and in highlighting prevailing water borne health hazards in the region. Assimilation and integration of spatial data at various stages of the work conducted on the GIS platform generated thematic and spatial distribution maps of the study region. The generated Thematic assessment substantiated the results of degrading water quality in the region and prevailing health hazards in the region.
Statistical analysis reveals a strong positive association between disease prevalence/distribution and spatial pattern in concentration of physio-chemical parameters taken for groundwater analysis in the area. The WQI for 89 samples have been calculated using the Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) method, wherein WQI values range between 71.23 to 447.39. Nearly 90% of the water samples exceeds the 200 WQI value, which is the highest permissible limit for drinking water in India as per BIS drinking water standards. This signifies that the maximum percentage of water available for human consumption pertains to ‘poor quality’ in the region. The higher values of the WQI are primarily due to a relatively higher concentration of Fluoride and TDS in the groundwater. Chemical characteristics of groundwater in the study area indicate an alkaline nature of water. The “Poor Quality” groundwater is primarily concentrated in the central, northern and northeastern region of the block. The region is dominated by a range of economic activities (industries, agriculture, etc.) directly corresponding to higher concentrations of fluorides and TDS in the groundwater.
The study highlights that the population depending directly on groundwater drinking sources is prone to the health problems like fluorosis and gastroenteritis therefore encourages simple water purification measures like filtration and boiling before consumption. The northeastern region with a high score of more than 250 WQI value is the most severely affected zone in the whole region with quality ranging from ‘Poor’ to ‘Water Unfit for Drinking Purposes’. It also shows higher reported cases of fluorosis and gastroenteritis within the whole region. Within the study area, Phagi and Renwal regions are observed to be most affected by poor standards of drinking water quality and showcase predominance the two diseases. Regression analysis further validates the observations establishing a positive correlation between concentration of diseases and quality of water. Therefore, the prevalence of water borne diseases like fluorosis and gastroenteritis and many other waterborne health hazards in the region may be attributed to poor groundwater quality with a higher concentration of fluoride and TDS in the groundwater.
The study also highlights the need for a definite strategy and guidelines pertaining to groundwater quality, quantity and accessibility management using quick, reliable technology. It thus highlights the potential of GIS for analyzing groundwater quality and its impacts on human health, which is imperative for effective planning of water quality management and healthcare systems. The study may therefore prove beneficial in effectively assessing the overall quality of groundwater resources available, provisions of clean, safe drinking water, management of water borne diseases, sensitizing and promoting safe drinking practices, in the given or similar geographical environment.

Author Contributions

P.U. and R.S. contributed equally to this work. Conceptualization, P.U. and R.S.; methodology, P.U.; software, R.S. and P.U.; validation, R.S. and P.U.; formal analysis, R.S. and P.U.; investigation, P.U.; resources, R.S. and P.U.; data curation, P.U.; writing—original draft preparation, P.U.; writing—review and editing, P.U. and R.S.; visualization, P.U.; supervision, P.U.; project administration, R.S. and P.U.; funding acquisition, K.S.A., A.H.R., A.A., and G.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

There was no funding for the study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data set used, maps prepared, original tabulation, and data analyzed during the present study can be obtained from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The researchers would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research, Qassim University for funding the publication of this project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

WQIWater Quality Index
GWQIGroundwater Quality Index
IDWInverse Distance Weighting.
BISBureau of Indian Standards
TDSTotal Dissolved Solids
pHPower of Hydrogen
IDWInverse Distance Weighting
PHCPrimary Health Centers

References

  1. Asadi, S.S.; Vuppala, P.; Reddy, M.A. Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques for Evaluation of Groundwater Quality in Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (Zone-V), India. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2007, 4, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Subbarao, C.; Subbarao, N.V.; Priyadarsini, J.P.; Nair, A.V. Assessment of Groundwater Quality in the Urban Aquifers of Visakhapatnam. J. Appl. Hydrol. 1997, 10, 60–70. [Google Scholar]
  3. Singha, S.S.; Devatha, C.P.; Singha, D.S.; Verma, M.K. Assessing Ground Water Quality using GIS. Int. J. Eng. Res. 2015, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fleisher, J.M.; Jones, F.; Kay, D.; Stanwell-Smith, R.; Wyer, M.; Morano, R. Water and Non-Water-Related Risk Factors for Gastroenteritis among Bathers Exposed to Sewage-Contaminated Marine Waters. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1993, 22, 698–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Garg, N.K.; Hassan, Q. Alarming Scarcity of Water in India. Curr. Sci. 2007, 93, 932–941. [Google Scholar]
  6. Faure, G. Principles and Applications of Geochemistry: A Comprehensive Textbook for Geology Students; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  7. Stallard, R.; Edmond, J.M. Geochemistry of the Amazon: 2. The Influence of Geology and Weathering Environment on the Dissolved Load. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 1983, 88, 9671–9688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Umar, R.; Absar, A. Chemical Characteristics of Groundwater in Parts of the Gambhir River Basin, Bharatpur District, Rajasthan, India. Environ. Earth Sci. 2003, 44, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Surinaidu, L.; Nandan, M.; Sahadevan, D.; Umamaheswari, A.; Tiwari, V. Source Identification and Management of Perennial Contaminated Groundwater Seepage in the Highly Industrial Watershed, South India. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 269, 116165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mahmood, A.; Kundu, A. India’s Demography in 2050: Size, Structure and Habitat. In Proceedings of the IWMI-TATA Partners Meet-2005, Anand, India, 24–26 February 2005. [Google Scholar]
  11. Phansalkar, S.J.; Kher, P.; Deshpande, P. Expanding Rings of Dryness: Water Imports from Hinterlands to Cities and the Rising Demands of Mega-Cities. In Proceedings of the IWMI-Tata Annual Partner’s Meet, Anand, India, 24–26 February 2005. [Google Scholar]
  12. Government of India Report. National Compilation on Dynamic Ground Water Resources of India, 2017; Ministry of Jal Shakti, Department of Water Resources, RD & GR Central Ground Water Board Faridabad: Faridabad, India, 2019.
  13. Ducci, D. GIS Techniques for Mapping Groundwater Contamination Risk. Nat. Hazards 1999, 20, 279–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Olajire, A.A.; Imeokparia, F.E. Water Quality Assessment of Osun River: Studies on Inorganic Nutrients. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2001, 69, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kumar, M.D.; Tortajada, C. Health Impacts of Water Pollution and Contamination. In Impact of Urbanization on Water Shortage in Face of Climatic Aberrations; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  16. Falkenberg, T.; Saxena, D.; Kistemann, T. Impact of Wastewater-Irrigation on in-Household Water Contamination. A Cohort Study among Urban Farmers in Ahmedabad, India. Sci. Total. Environ. 2018, 639, 988–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ali, S.A.; Ahmad, A. Analysing Water-Borne Diseases Susceptibility in Kolkata Municipal Corporation Using WQI and GIS Based Kriging Interpolation. Geo J. 2020, 85, 1151–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schneider, K. Groundwater Scarcity, Pollution Set India on Perilous Course. Circle of Blue. Available online: https://www.circleofblue.org/2018/world/groundwater-scarcity-pollution-set-india-on-perilous-course/ (accessed on 27 October 2020).
  19. Alssgeer, H.M.A.; Gasim, M.B.; Hanafiah, M.M.; Abdulhadi, E.R.A.; Azid, A. GIS-Based Analysis of Water Quality Deterioration in the Nerus River, Kuala Terengganu Malaysia. Desalinzation Water Treat. 2018, 112, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Venkateswaran, S.; Deepa, S. Assessment of Groundwater Quality Using GIS Techniques in Vaniyar Watershed, Ponnaiyar River, Tamil Nadu. Aquat. Proc. 2015, 4, 1283–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zeilhofer, P.; Zeilhofer, L.V.A.C.; Hardoim, E.L.; De Lima, Z.M.; Oliveira, C.S. GIS Applications for Mapping and Spatial Modeling of Urban-Use Water Quality: A Case Study in District of Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Cad. Saúde Pública 2007, 23, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Longley, P.A.; Goodchild, M.F.; Maguire, D.J.; Rhind, D.W. Geographic Information Systems and Science; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bidhuri, S.; Jain, P. Identifying Waterborne Disease Prone Areas Using Geospatial Approach Along the Right Bank of Yamuna River in Delhi. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2019, 29, 561–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mishra, V.C. Geography of Rajasthan; National Book Trust: New Delhi, India, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bhakar, P.; Singh, A.P. Groundwater Quality Assessment in a Hyper-arid Region of Rajasthan, India. Nonrenew. Resour. 2019, 28, 505–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Agrawal, R. Study of Physico-Chemical Parameters of Groundwater Quality of Dudu Town in Rajasthan. Rasayan J. Chem. 2009, 2, 969–971. [Google Scholar]
  27. Durfor, C.N.; Becker, E. Public Water Supplies of the 100 Largest Cities of the United States, 1962; US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1964.
  28. Tirkey, P.; Bhattacharya, T.; Chakraborty, S.; Baraik, S. Assessment of Groundwater Quality and Associated Health Risks: A Case Study of Ranchi City, Jharkhand, India. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2017, 5, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. BIS 10500; Indian Standard Drinking Water Specifications IS 10500: 1991, Edition 2.2, 2003–2009. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards): New Delhi, India, 2003; p. 18.
  30. Bouslah, S.; Lakhdar, D.; Larbi, H. Water Quality Index Assessment of Koudiat Medouar Reservoir, Northeast Algeria Using Weighted Arithmetic Index Method. J. Water Land Dev. 2017, 35, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Prasad, B.; Rao, P.R.; Tigga, A. Groundwater Quality Assessment Using the Weighted Arithmetic Index Method in the Selected Villages of Butchayyapeta Mandal, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chandra, D.S.; Asadi, S.S.; Raju, M.V.S. Estimation of Water Quality Index by Weighted Arithmetic Water Quality Index Method: A Model Study. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 2017, 8, 1215–1222. [Google Scholar]
  33. Swaine, S.; Schneider, P.J. The Chemistry of Surface Water in Prairie Ponds. Am. Chem. Soc. Adv. Chem. Ser. 1971, 106, 99–104. [Google Scholar]
  34. Frape, S.; Fritz, P.; McNutt, R. Water-Rock Interaction and Chemistry of Groundwaters from the Canadian Shield. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1984, 48, 1617–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Raju, K.C.B. Importance of Recharging Depleted Aquifers: State of the Art of Artificial Recharge in India. J. Geol. Soc. India 1998, 51, 429–454. [Google Scholar]
  36. Stumm, W.; Morgan, J.J. Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural Waters, 3rd ed.; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; Volume 126. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wicks, C.M.; Herman, J.S. The Effect of a Confining Unit on the Geochemical Evolution of Ground Water in the Upper Floridan Aquifer System. J. Hydrol. 1994, 153, 139–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Machiwal, D.; Jha, M.K.; Mal, B.C. GIS-based Assessment and Characterization of Groundwater Quality in a Hard-Rock Hilly Terrain of Western India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 174, 645–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bartier, P.M.; Keller, C. Multivariate Interpolation to Incorporate Thematic Surface Data Using Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW). Comput. Geosci. 1996, 22, 795–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mueller, T.G.; Pusuluri, N.B.; Mathias, K.K.; Cornelius, P.L.; Barnhisel, R.I.; Shearer, S.A. Map Quality for Ordinary Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighted Interpolation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2004, 68, 2042–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lad, D.; Mehta, M.; Vashi, M. Assessment of Surface Water Quality Using GIS: Case of Tapi Basin, Surat, Gujarat, India. In Proceedings of FORM 2021; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 303–311. [Google Scholar]
  42. Huchhe, M.R.; Bandela, N.N. Study of Water Quality Parameter Assessment Using GIS and Remote Sensing in DR. B.A.M University, Aurangabad, MS. Int. J. Latest Technol. Eng. Manag. Appl. Sci. 2016, 5, 46–50. [Google Scholar]
  43. Cude, C.G. Oregon Water Quality Index a Tool for Evaluating Water Quality Management Effectiveness. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2001, 37, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Srinivasamoorthy, K.; Nanthakumar, C.; Vasanthavigar, M.; Vijayaraghavan, K.; Rajivgandhi, R.; Chidambaram, S.; Anandhan, P.; Manivannan, R.; Vasudevan, S. Groundwater Quality Assessment from a Hard Rock Terrain, Salem district of Tamilnadu, India. Arab. J. Geosci. 2011, 4, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Herojeet, R.; Rishi, M.S.; Lata, R.; Sharma, R. Application of Environmetrics Statistical Models and Water Quality Index for Groundwater Quality Characterization of Alluvial Aquifer of Nalagarh Valley, Himachal Pradesh, India. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 2016, 2, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ramakrishnaiah, C.R.; Sadashivaiah, C.; Ranganna, G. Assessment of Water Quality Index for the Groundwater in Tumkur Taluk, Karnataka State, India. E-J. Chem. 2009, 6, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Aoun, A.; Darwiche, F.; Al Hayek, S.; Doumit, J. The Fluoride Debate: The Pros and Cons of Fluoridation. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2018, 23, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kusuma, S. Assesment and Mapping of Ground Water Quality Using Geographical Information Systems. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2010, 2, 6035–6046. [Google Scholar]
  49. Grandjean, A.; Bartram, J. Essential Nature of Water for Health: Water as Part of the Dietary Intake for Nutrients and the Role of Water in Hygiene. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Health; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 594–604. [Google Scholar]
  50. Warren, J.J.; Levy, S.M.; Broffitt, B.; Cavanaugh, J.E.; Kanellis, M.J.; Weber-Gasparoni, K. Considerations on Optimal Fluoride Intake Using Dental Fluorosis and Dental Caries Outcomes-A Longitudinal Study. J. Public Health Dent. 2009, 69, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Karanis, P. Giardia and Cryptosporidium: Occurrence in Water Supplies. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Health; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 946–954. [Google Scholar]
  52. Pal, M.; Ayele, Y.; Hadush, A.; Panigrahi, S.; Jadhav, V.J. Public Health Hazards Due to Unsafe Drinking Water. Air Water Borne Dis. 2018, 7, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gall, A.M.; Mariñas, B.J.; Lu, Y.; Shisler, J.L. Waterborne Viruses: A Barrier to Safe Drinking Water. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bain, R.; Cronk, R.; Hossain, R.; Bonjour, S.; Onda, K.; Wright, J.; Yang, H.; Slaymaker, T.; Hunter, P.; Prüss-Ustün, A.; et al. Global Assessment of Exposure to Faecal Contamination through Drinking Water Based on a Systematic Review. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2014, 19, 917–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Suthar, S.; Garg, V.K.; Jangir, S.; Kaur, S.; Goswami, N.; Singh, S. Fluoride contamination in drinking water in rural habitations of Northern Rajasthan, India. Environ. Monitor. Assess. 2008, 145, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Den Besten, P.; Li, W. Chronic Fluoride Toxicity: Dental Fluorosis. Oral Biofilms 2011, 22, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. WHO, Geneva, Water-Related Diseases—Fluorosis. 1999. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/maternal-newborn-child-adolescent-health-and-ageing/maternal-health/about/water-sanitation-and-health (accessed on 15 September 2021).
  58. Cotruvo, J.A. 2017 WHO Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality: First Addendum to the Fourth Edition. J.-Am. Water Work. Assoc. 2017, 109, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Susheela, A.K.; Toteja, G. Prevention & Control of Fluorosis & Linked Disorders: Developments in the 21st Century-Reaching Out to Patients in the Community & Hospital Settings for Recovery. Indian J. Med Res. 2018, 148, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Susheela, A.K. Fluorosis and Iodine Deficiency Disorders in India. Curr. Sci. 2018, 115, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pneumonia and Diarrhoea: Tackling the Deadliest Diseases for the World’s Poorest Children; UNICEF: New York, NY, USA, 2012.
  62. Jain, P.; Jain, A. Waterborne Viral Gastroenteritis: An Introduction to Common Agents. In Water and Health; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2014; pp. 53–74. [Google Scholar]
  63. Häfliger, D.; Hübner, P.; Lüthy, J. Outbreak of Viral Gastroenteritis due to Sewage-Contaminated Drinking Water. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2000, 54, 123–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kukkula, M.; Arstila, P.; Klossner, M.-L.; Maunula, L.; Bonsdorff, C.-H.V.; Jaatinen, P. Waterborne Outbreak of Viral Gastroenteritis. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 1997, 29, 415–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Study Area—Location map (Source—Primary Data).
Figure 1. Study Area—Location map (Source—Primary Data).
Water 14 00296 g001
Figure 2. Water sample location sites (16 well locations, Phagi Block, Rajasthan, India (Source—Primary Data).
Figure 2. Water sample location sites (16 well locations, Phagi Block, Rajasthan, India (Source—Primary Data).
Water 14 00296 g002
Figure 3. Research methodology flowchart.
Figure 3. Research methodology flowchart.
Water 14 00296 g003
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of TDS (A) and Fluoride (B) concentration in Phagi Tehsil (Source—Primary Data).
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of TDS (A) and Fluoride (B) concentration in Phagi Tehsil (Source—Primary Data).
Water 14 00296 g004
Figure 5. Water quality map using WQI of 89 Villages in the Phagi Tehsil (Source—Primary Data).
Figure 5. Water quality map using WQI of 89 Villages in the Phagi Tehsil (Source—Primary Data).
Water 14 00296 g005
Figure 6. Percentage of Fluorosis cases recorded. (A) linear regression analysis between fluorosis cases and fluoride content in water (B).
Figure 6. Percentage of Fluorosis cases recorded. (A) linear regression analysis between fluorosis cases and fluoride content in water (B).
Water 14 00296 g006
Figure 7. Percentage gastroenteritis incidences cases recorded (A); linear regression analysis between gastroenteritis cases and TDS content in water (B).
Figure 7. Percentage gastroenteritis incidences cases recorded (A); linear regression analysis between gastroenteritis cases and TDS content in water (B).
Water 14 00296 g007
Table 1. Indian BIS standards for drinking water quality; all variables are in (mg/L) except pH (unitless) (Source—Indian Standard (BIS10500/1991).
Table 1. Indian BIS standards for drinking water quality; all variables are in (mg/L) except pH (unitless) (Source—Indian Standard (BIS10500/1991).
Chemical Parameter (mg/L)Indian Standard (BIS10500/1991)
TDS500
pH6.5
Bicarbonate-
Phosphate-
Sodium200
Calcium75
Nitrate45
Fluoride1.0
Chloride200
Total hardness200
Sulphate-
Potassium-
Table 2. Relative weight of chemical parameters.
Table 2. Relative weight of chemical parameters.
Chemical Parameter (mg/L)Indian Standard (BIS10500/1991)Weight (wi)Relative Weight (Wi)
TDS50050.117
pH6.540.097
Bicarbonate-10.023
Phosphate-10.023
Sodium20050.117
Calcium7550.097
Nitrate4520.047
Fluoride1.050.117
Chloride20040.121
Total hardness20040.121
Sulphate-10.023
Potassium-40.033
∑wi = 41∑Wi = 0.936
Table 3. Water Quality Index (WQI) categories.
Table 3. Water Quality Index (WQI) categories.
S.NOWater Quality IndexWater Quality
10–100Excellent
2100–200Good
3200–300Poor
4300–400Very poor
5>400Unsuitable for drinking
Table 4. PHC wise incidence of diseases and concentration of selected chemicals in groundwater (mg/L).
Table 4. PHC wise incidence of diseases and concentration of selected chemicals in groundwater (mg/L).
PHCChemical ConcentrationPercentage of Cases with Disease
Incidences 2018–2019
FluorideTDSFluorosisGastroenteritis
Phagi3.3820343.872.98
Madhorajpura1.4821753.094.52
Chauru1.9018971.994.85
Renwal2.731343.5010.03
Nimera1.419051.502.80
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Singh, R.; Upreti, P.; Allemailem, K.S.; Almatroudi, A.; Rahmani, A.H.; Albalawi, G.M. Geospatial Assessment of Ground Water Quality and Associated Health Problems in the Western Region of India. Water 2022, 14, 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14030296

AMA Style

Singh R, Upreti P, Allemailem KS, Almatroudi A, Rahmani AH, Albalawi GM. Geospatial Assessment of Ground Water Quality and Associated Health Problems in the Western Region of India. Water. 2022; 14(3):296. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14030296

Chicago/Turabian Style

Singh, Rani, Pallavi Upreti, Khaled S. Allemailem, Ahmad Almatroudi, Arshad Husain Rahmani, and Ghadah M. Albalawi. 2022. "Geospatial Assessment of Ground Water Quality and Associated Health Problems in the Western Region of India" Water 14, no. 3: 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14030296

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop