Next Article in Journal
Integrated Groundwater Flow Modeling for Managing a Complex Alluvial Aquifer Case of Study Mio-Plio-Quaternary Plain of Kairouan (Central Tunisia)
Previous Article in Journal
Analytical Framework for Understanding the Differences between Technical Standards Originating from Various Regions to Improve International Hydropower Project Delivery
Previous Article in Special Issue
On Dam Failure Induced Seismic Signals Using Laboratory Tests and on Breach Morphology due to Overtopping by Modeling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Soil–Water Conservation, Erosion and Landslide

1
Department of Soil and Water Conservation, National Chung Hsing University, 145 Xingda Road, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
2
Innovation and Development Centre of Sustainable Agriculture (IDCSA), National Chung Hsing University, 145 Xingda Road, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
Water 2022, 14(4), 665; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14040665
Submission received: 25 November 2021 / Revised: 11 February 2022 / Accepted: 16 February 2022 / Published: 21 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil–Water Conservation, Erosion, and Landslide)
In the wake of climate change, extreme storm events, catastrophic disasters (including soil erosion, debris and landslide formation, loss of life, etc.) have surged. These disasters are more common in mountainous regions, and could be a result of tectonic, climatic, and/or human activities [1,2,3]. Over the past two decades, more than 300 natural disasters occur annually around the globe, affecting over four billion and cost around USD 2.97 trillion [4,5]. The 2021 state of the environment notes that disasters are continuing to take a heavy toll on life and assets, severely affecting and rolling back the development gains of countries [6]. In addition, Mohammed et al. [7] and the sixth Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report [8] note with confidence that human-induced climate change is the dominant driver in sediment related natural disasters. In assessing the influence of climate change on soil erosion and sediment yield, Chen et al. [9] illustrate an increase in these events under the A1B-climate change scenario. This study highlights the importance of incorporating climate change in sediment-related disaster models. One of the most important transboundary rivers in China, the Lancang-Mekong River has been shown to cause major sediment loads in the last decade in Asian Rivers with a mean annual loss of 5350 t ha−1 year−1 [10].
In sight of this, this Special Issue aimed to contribute towards improving our knowledge and understanding on the processes and mechanics of soil erosion and landslides, as these are among the main natural disasters affecting the globe. This is crucial in developing the right tools and models for soil and water conservation, disaster mitigation, and early warning systems. Several novel tools and methodologies are presented in this Special Issue.
Several novel tools and methodologies are presented in this Special Issue, which consists of 19 articles, covering a wide range of topics, including landslide prediction models, soil erosion and sediment yield estimation, flood simulations, dam breach, and rainfall-runoff models.
Wu and Yeh [11] developed an improved landslide probability model from existing models by including long-term landslide inventory and rainfall factors, which can further be used to predict landslides based on future changes in rainfall patterns. In addition to the aforementioned landslide probability model, Wu et al. [12] argue that landslide susceptibility assessments after extreme rainfall events is equally critical. Four methods are evaluated based on 12 landslide related factors which formed the basis for the landslide susceptibility assessment. The methods include Landslide ratio-based logistic regression (LRBLR), Frequency Ration Method (FRM), Instability Index Method (IIM), and Weight of Evidence Method (WEM). Among these, the LRBLR method is shown to be the best in landslide susceptibility assessment. The article by Wu and Lin [13] presents a method applying rainfall analysis, spatiotemporal landslide analysis, and comparison analysis of rainfall induced landslide and earth quakes to evaluate how landslides would be active after specific rainfall events. In classifying landslides, Wan et al. [14] presented a methodology that applied hyperspectral data instead of solely relying on digital elevation models. The model can differentiate bare land to landslides, which has often been a complex task.
In addition to the application of complex models, some authors [15,16] argued that the ability of vegetation in mitigating soil erosion and subsequent large sediment yield under extreme rainfall events and runoff is not well investigated. Different vegetation communities enacted at 1, 11, 15, 25, and 40 years were evaluated. Findings showed root biomass can reach up to ~11 mg/cm3, which reduces slope runoff velocity by 48%, while increasing runoff resistance by 35 times. The results suggest the importance of indigenous knowledge in reducing the impacts of sediment related disasters. Chen, Guo, and Wang [16] compared farmland with revegetated gullies and demonstrated that revegetating gullies could lower soil erodibility by 31–78% and could further improve critical shear stress by up to four times, and stable conditions were possible in approximately 18 years. The importance of riparian vegetation in stabilizing river banks is illustrated by Zhu et al. [17]. The authors show that healthy native alpine swamp can enhance riverbank stability and could further delay the development of tensile cracks.
The article by Liu et al. [18] describes a novel shallow water equation based methodology that could simulate flood routing in complex terrains. Hung et al. [19] used flume tests to study dam breach and the resulting seismic signals induced. The authors conclude overtopping discharge and lateral sliding masses are significant in influencing the evolution of dam breach. The resulting dam breach model from the study is important for dam breach warning, which could save lives in the event of a catastrophic dam breach associated with floods.
Mosavi et al. [20] presents a novel machine learning model (Weighted sub-space random forest) to map susceptibility of water erosion of the soil. In applying the model, 19 factors are applied (some of these are aspect, curvature, slope length, flow accumulation, normalized vegetative index, soil texture, lithology, etc.). Such a tool is crucial in watershed conservation, especially in a world generating enormous data that requires super-fast models. In another instance, Lee et al. [21] evaluates seven machine learning models for time-saving to estimate the rainfall-erosivity factor (R-factor) used in the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE). Their findings show that deep neural networks are very efficient estimating the R-factor given monthly precipitation, maximum daily precipitation, and maximum hourly precipitation.
Finally, the article by Lee, Lu, and Huang [21] investigate the interaction between overfall types and scour at bridges. When a bridge pier is in the maximum scour location, it induces more scour due to disturbances caused by the water jet and the pier; hence, more attention is required to protect the pier. This is especially important in areas prone to earthquakes, which may cause the riverbed to uplift.
In conclusion, the Special Issue presents several articles. They are broadly categorized into five themes: (i) those with emphasis on soil erosion and how climate change has worsened natural disasters; (ii) those investigating and developing landslide related models; (iii) articles regarding flood models and dam breach processes; (iv) articles focusing on the application of recent technologies, such as machine learning in addressing sediment related disasters; and (v) studies dedicated at the protection of riverine structures. These articles have indeed contributed immensely towards understanding soil erosion and landslide processes, and the corresponding necessary tools to foster resilience. This further aligns with some of the post 2015 global frameworks, such as the Sendai Framework which articulates the need for improved understanding of disasters in all its dimensions.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Noguchi, K.; Tsou, C.-Y.; Ishikawa, Y.; Higaki, D.; Wu, C.-Y. Tree-Ring Based Chronology of Landslides in the Shirakami Mountains, Japan. Water 2021, 13, 1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yan, R.-X.; Peng, J.-B.; Zhang, J.-Y.; Wang, S.-k. Static Liquefaction Capacity of Saturated Undisturbed Loess in South Jingyang Platform. Water 2020, 12, 2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wen, Y.; Gao, P.; Mu, X.; Li, M.; Su, Y.; Wang, H. Experimental Study on Landslides in Terraced Fields in the Chinese Loessial Region under Extreme Rainfall. Water 2021, 13, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Prasad, A.S.; Francescutti, L.H. Natural Disasters. In International Encyclopedia of Public Health, 2nd ed.; Quah, S.R., Ed.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2017; pp. 215–222. [Google Scholar]
  5. United Nations Disaster Risk Reduction. Human Cost of Disasters—An Overview of the Last 20 Years 2000–2019; United Nations Disaster Risk Reduction: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. World Meteorological Organization. State of Climate in 2021: Extreme Events and Major Impacts; WMO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mohammed, S.; Abdo, H.G.; Szabo, S.; Pham, Q.B.; Holb, I.J.; Linh, N.T.T.; Anh, D.T.; Alsafadi, K.; Mokhtar, A.; Kbibo, I.; et al. Estimating Human Impacts on Soil Erosion Considering Different Hillslope Inclinations and Land Uses in the Coastal Region of Syria. Water 2020, 12, 2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixthssessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, C.-N.; Tfwala, S.S.; Tsai, C.-H. Climate Change Impacts on Soil Erosion and Sediment Yield in a Watershed. Water 2020, 12, 2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chuenchum, P.; Xu, M.; Tang, W. Estimation of Soil Erosion and Sediment Yield in the Lancang–Mekong River Using the Modified Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation and GIS Techniques. Water 2020, 12, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wu, C.-Y.; Yeh, Y.-C. A Landslide Probability Model Based on a Long-Term Landslide Inventory and Rainfall Factors. Water 2020, 12, 937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Wu, C. Landslide Susceptibility Based on Extreme Rainfall-Induced Landslide Inventories and the Following Landslide Evolution. Water 2019, 11, 2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Wu, C.; Lin, C. Spatiotemporal Hotspots and Decadal Evolution of Extreme Rainfall-Induced Landslides: Case Studies in Southern Taiwan. Water 2021, 13, 2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wan, S.; Lei, T.C.; Ma, H.L.; Cheng, R.W. The Analysis on Similarity of Spectrum Analysis of Landslide and Bareland through Hyper-Spectrum Image Bands. Water 2019, 11, 2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chang, E.; Li, P.; Li, Z.; Su, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; Li, Z. The Impact of Vegetation Successional Status on Slope Runoff Erosion in the Loess Plateau of China. Water 2019, 11, 2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Chen, Z.; Guo, M.; Wang, W. Variations in Soil Erosion Resistance of Gully Head along a 25-Year Revegetation Age on the Loess Plateau. Water 2020, 12, 3301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, H.; Gao, P.; Li, Z.; Fu, J.; Li, G.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.; Hu, X. Impacts of the Degraded Alpine Swamp Meadow on Tensile Strength of Riverbank: A Case Study of the Upper Yellow River. Water 2020, 12, 2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, D.; Tang, J.; Wang, H.; Cao, Y.; Bazai, N.A.; Chen, H.; Liu, D. A New Method for Wet-Dry Front Treatment in Outburst Flood Simulation. Water 2021, 13, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hung, C.-Y.; Tseng, I.-F.; Chen, S.-C.; Feng, Z.-Y. On Dam Failure Induced Seismic Signals Using Laboratory Tests and on Breach Morphology Due to Overtopping by Modeling. Water 2021, 13, 2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mosavi, A.; Sajedi-Hosseini, F.; Choubin, B.; Taromideh, F.; Rahi, G.; Dineva, A.A. Susceptibility Mapping of Soil Water Erosion Using Machine Learning Models. Water 2020, 12, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, W.-L.; Lu, C.-W.; Huang, C.-K. A Study on Interaction between Overfall Types and Scour at Bridge Piers with a Moving-Bed Experiment. Water 2021, 13, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, S.-C. Soil–Water Conservation, Erosion and Landslide. Water 2022, 14, 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14040665

AMA Style

Chen S-C. Soil–Water Conservation, Erosion and Landslide. Water. 2022; 14(4):665. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14040665

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Su-Chin. 2022. "Soil–Water Conservation, Erosion and Landslide" Water 14, no. 4: 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14040665

APA Style

Chen, S. -C. (2022). Soil–Water Conservation, Erosion and Landslide. Water, 14(4), 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14040665

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop