The Demographic Implication for Promoting Sponge City Initiatives in the Chinese Megacities: A Case of Wuhan
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Background
2.1. Demographic Factors and Environmental Perception
2.2. Nature-Based Solution and a “Sponge City”
3. Wuhan, Flood and Sponge City
4. Methods
4.1. Questionnaire Design
- a.
- Demographic information (gender, age, education, years of living in Wuhan to represent the residential time; Q1 to Q4).
- b.
- Knowledge and perception about urban flooding and governmental water management (Q5 to Q7).
- c.
- Awareness and perception about Sponge City initiatives (Q8 to Q10).
- d.
- Perspective on climate change and local aquatic ecosystem (Q11 to Q14).
- e.
- Perceptions of and attitudes towards Sponge Cities and their environmental benefits and socioeconomic effects (Q15 to Q22)
4.2. Structured Interview Surveys
- a.
- What do you think about the urban flood (waterlogging) problem, do you think the Sponge City policy can relieve the flood risk of Wuhan?
- b.
- What do you think about climate change? Do you think the Sponge City policy can mitigate the impacts of climate change?
- c.
- Do you support Wuhan and other Chinese cities to carry on the SCP, for what reasons?
- d.
- Have you experienced the 1998 and 2016 Wuhan floods; would you share your experiences?
- e.
- Do you think the floods at Wuhan are enhanced by the force of nature or by a human? Anything to share about the differences in the past and present flood protection practices locally?
4.3. Questionnaire Survey Data Analyses
4.3.1. Descriptive Analyses and Frequency Analyses
4.3.2. Chi-Square Analyses for Association
5. Results and Discussions
5.1. The City and the Participant
5.2. Demographic Characteristics of the Respondents and Wuhan City
5.3. Influence of Socioeconomic Factors/Differences
5.3.1. Cross-Analyses on Education Level
5.3.2. Cross-Analyses on Age and Residential Period
5.3.3. Cross-Analyses on Gender
5.4. Qualitative Evaluation Based on Interview
5.4.1. The Response Rate about Demographic Background
5.4.2. Experiential Understanding of the Causes of Flood
“Wuhan has developed very fast these days and relying on drainage to relieve urban floods, but the drainage system is not able to deal with the big storms such as the 2016 flood, plus other events…”; “…Wuhan has been urbanised quite a lot; the green spaces for catching rainwater is decreasing; plus the lakes, wetlands and ponds are diminishing. I think these facts cause the urban floods in the city…”
5.4.3. The Awareness of Sponge City Program
“[SCP] absolutely can relief the urban flood issues in Wuhan…”; “…I do not understand what is the exact meaning of ‘Sponge City Program’, but I hope for any new policy that solves the urban flood problem in Wuhan…”
“I think the SCP cannot solve the issue like a flood in July 2016. Eventually, we need a better land drainage system…”; “the program sounds like a nice idea, but … it only covered a rather small area in Wuhan. Promoting the program to be implemented everywhere should be very difficult…”
“I support the Program, it seems to be very environmentally friendly”; “I think the SCP can contribute to green space development, benefiting the urban city like Wuhan and improving urban ecology.”
5.5. The Cross-Analyses between Questions
5.6. The Media Public Received Information
6. Discussion to Recommend Policy Dissemination and Further Research
6.1. Experiential Perception and Educated Knowledge on SCP
6.2. Recommendation for Informing the Public
6.3. Further Research and Limitations
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
- (1)
- Age:a. Under 20 b. 20–29 c. 30–39 d. 40–49 e. Above 50
- (2)
- Educational Background:a. Primary school or lower b. Secondary/High school c. Undergraduate schoold. Post-graduate school
- (3)
- Gendera. Male b. Female
- (4)
- How long have you been in Wuhan?_______year(s)
- (5)
- Do you think waterlogging in Wuhan is serious?a. Not serious b. Minor issue c. Moderately serious d. Very serious
- (6)
- What do you think causes waterlogging in Wuhan?a. Heavy rains b. Global climate change c. Poorly designed urban drainage facilitiesd. Multiple factors
- (7)
- Do you think the government has done enough to mitigate the urban waterlogging in Wuhan?a. Little b. Some c. Moderate d. Significant
- (8)
- Do you know the Sponge City Program (SCP) in Wuhan?a. Little b. Aware c. Moderate d. very ClearIf you didn’t choose a, through which medium did you learn about this project?a. TV b. Newspapers c. Lectures taught by teachers d. Books e. Billboards f. Others
- (9)
- Do you think SCP is effective in improving urban flood control capacity?a. Not at all b. A little c. Medium d. Very much
- (10)
- Wuhan is one of the first 16 pilot cities for SCP in China. Should this Sponge City construction be promoted in other cities in China?a. Yes b. No
- (1)
- What do you think about the urban flood (waterlogging) problem, do you think Sponge City policy can relieve the flood risk in Wuhan?
- (2)
- What do you think about climate change? Do you think the Sponge City policy can mitigate the impacts of climate change?
- (3)
- Do you support Wuhan and other cities to carry on the SCP, for what reasons?
- (4)
- Have you experienced the 1998 and 2016 Wuhan floods; would you share your experience?
- (5)
- Do you think the floods at Wuhan are enhanced by the force of nature or by a human? Anything to share about the differences in the past and present flood protection practices locally?
Appendix B
Sample Size | Duration of Questionnaire | Categories * | AGE | EDUCATION | GENDER | Residential Time (Years) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | |||||||
1688 | 2 July to 25 August 2017 | A | 392 | 59 | 944 | Minimum | 0.0 |
B | 672 | 352 | 744 | 25 Percentile | 3.0 | ||
C | 237 | 351 | - | 50 Percentile | 6.0 | ||
D | 230 | 155 | - | 75 Percentile | 20.0 | ||
E | 157 | - | - | Maximum | 82.0 |
Categories * | Flood Related | Sponge City Related | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q8a | Q9 | Q10 | |
A | 58 | 241 | 152 | 959 | 285 | 121 | 1465 |
B | 633 | 61 | 728 | 596 | 145 | 737 | 142 |
C | 592 | 509 | 658 | 109 | 172 | 514 | 0 |
D | 405 | 877 | 145 | 18 | 33 | 214 | 0 |
E | - | - | - | - | 28 | - | - |
References
- Niles, M.T.; Lubell, M.; Haden, V.R. Perceptions and responses to climate policy risks among California farmers. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2013, 23, 1752–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, V.; Bonilla Brenes, J.R.; Chapa, F.; Hack, J. Development and modelling of realistic retrofitted Nature-based Solution scenarios to reduce flood occurrence at the catchment scale. Ambio 2021, 50, 1462–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mei, C.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Yang, Z.; Ding, X.; Shao, W. Integrated assessments of green infrastructure for flood mitigation to support robust decision-making for sponge city construction in an urbanized watershed. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 639, 1394–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Cai, J.; Zuo, J.; Bartsch, K.; Huang, M. Conflict or consensus? Stakeholders’ willingness to participate in China’s Sponge City program. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 769, 145250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wan, C.; Shen, G.Q.; Choi, S. A review on political factors influencing public support for urban environmental policy. Environ. Sci. Policy 2017, 75, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slimak, M.W.; Dietz, T. Personal Values, Beliefs, and Ecological Risk Perception. Risk Anal. 2006, 26, 1689–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gifford, R.; Nilsson, A. Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. Int. J. Psychol. 2014, 49, 141–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, M. Public environmental skepticism: A cross-national and multilevel analysis. Int. Sociol. 2015, 30, 61–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oslen, V.B.K.; Galloway, G.E.; Ruth, M. The Demographics of Public Participation Access When Communicating Environmental Risk. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 2018, 24, 115–136. [Google Scholar]
- Rajapaksa, D.; Islam, M.; Managi, S. Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Role of Public Perception in Infrastructure and the Social Factors for Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2018, 10, 937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dang, W. How culture shapes environmental public participation: Case studies of China, the Netherlands, and Italy. J. Chin. Gov. 2020, 5, 390–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leiserowitz, A. International Public Opinion, Perception, and Understanding of Global Climate Change, Human Development Occasional Papers (1992–2007) HDOCPA-2007-31; Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP): New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez, M.; López-Mosquera, N.; Lera-López, F. Improving Pro-environmental Behaviours in Spain. The Role of Attitudes and Socio-demographic and Political Factors. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2016, 18, 47–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ito, H.; Kawazoe, N. The associations between sociodemographic factors and environmental knowledge in the city of Toyota, Japan. Appl. Environ. Educ. Commun. 2018, 17, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jim, C.Y.; Chen, W.Y. Perception and Attitude of Residents toward Urban Green Spaces in Guangzhou (China). Environ. Manag. 2006, 38, 338–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Huang, M.; Zuo, J.; Rameezdeen, R. Received vs. given: Willingness to pay for sponge city program from a perceived value perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 256, 120479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, K.-K. Environmental awareness, governance and public participation: Public perception perspectives. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2010, 67, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martens, S. Public participation with Chinese characteristics: Citizen consumers in China’s environmental management. Environ. Politics 2006, 15, 211–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Temmerman, S.; Meire, P.; Bouma, T.; Herman, P.; Ysebaert, T.; De Vriend, H. Ecosystem-based coastal defense in the face of global change. Nature 2013, 504, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WWF. Natural and Nature-Based Flood Management: A Green Guide; World Wildlife Fund: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- World Bank. Implementing Nature-Based Flood Protection: Principles and Implementation Guidance; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Ellis, J.B.; Revitt, D.M. The management of urban surface water drainage in England and Wales. Water Environ. J. 2010, 24, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scholz, M.; Yang, Q. Guidance on variables characterising water bodies including sustainable flood retention basins. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 98, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Everett, G.; Lamond, J.; Morzillo, A.T.; Chan, F.K.S.; Matsler, A.M. Sustainable drainage systems: Helping people live with water. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Water Management; Thomas Telford Ltd.: London, UK, 2015; Volume 169, pp. 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tang, Y.-T.; Chan, F.K.S.; O’Donnell, E.C.; Griffiths, J.; Lau, L.; Higgitt, D.L.; Thorne, C.R. Aligning ancient and modern approaches to sustainable urban water management in China: Ningbo as a “Blue-Green City” in the “Sponge City” campaign. J. Flood Risk Manag. 2018, 11, e12451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adger, W.N.; Pulhin, J.M.; Barnett, J.; Dabelko, G.D.; Hovelsrud, G.K.; Levy, M.; Oswald Spring, Ú.; Vogel, C.H. Human security. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Dokken, D.J., Mach, K.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K.L., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 755–791. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, L.; Scheffran, J.; Qin, H.; You, Q. Climate-related flood risks and urban responses in the Pearl River Delta, China. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2015, 15, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, F.K.S.; Wright, N.; Cheng, X.; Griffith, J. After sandy: Rethinking flood risk management in Asian coastal megacities. Nat. Hazards Rev. 2014, 15, 101–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xia, J.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Xiong, L.H.; He, S.; Wang, L.F.; Yu, Z.B. Opportunities and challenges of the Sponge City construction related to urban water issues in China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2017, 60, 652–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Chan, F.K.S.; Holden, J.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Guan, D.B. China’s water management—Challenges and solutions. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2013, 12, 1311–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MOHURD. Technical Guidelines for Sponge City Construction (for Trial Implementation); Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China: Beijing, China, 2014. Available online: http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/zcfg/jsbwj_0/jsbwjcsjs/201411/t20141102_219465.html (accessed on 1 July 2017).
- MOHURD. The Notice on Carrying out Sponge City Construction Pilot with Central Financial Support; Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China: Beijing, China, 2014. Available online: http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/zcfg/jsbwj_0/jsbwjcsjs/201501/t20150115_220129.html (accessed on 21 July 2017).
- Ferreira, V.; Barreira, A.P.; Loures, L.; Antunes, D.; Panagopoulos, T. Stakeholders’ engagement on nature-based solutions: A systematic literature review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bastien, N.R.P.; Arthur, S.; McLoughlin, M.J. Valuing amenity: Public perceptions of sustainable drainage systems ponds. Water Environ. J. 2011, 26, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, X. Flood Risk Perception and Communication within Risk Management in Different Cultural Contexts: A Comparative Case Study between Wuhan, China, and Cologne, Germany. Ph.D. Thesis, United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS), University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Dai, L.P.; van Rijswick, H.F.M.W.; Driessen, P.P.J.; Keessen, A.M. Governance of the Sponge City Programme in China with Wuhan as a case study. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2017, 34, 578–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oosterberg, W.; Drimmelen, C.V.; Vlist, M.V.D. Strategies to harmonize urbanization and flood risk management in deltas. European Regional Science Association. In Proceedings of the 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: “Land Use and Water Management in a Sustainable Network Society”, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 23–27 August 2005; p. ersa05p174. [Google Scholar]
- Wuhan Municipal Bureau of Statistics. National Economic and Social Development Statistical Bulletin in 2014 of Wuhan City; Wuhan Municipal Bureau of Statistics: Wuhan, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, S.; Zevenbergen, C.; Rabé, P.; Jiang, Y. The influences of sponge city on property values in Wuhan, China. Water 2018, 10, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, J.; Wang, S.Y.; Li, D.M. The analysis of the impact of land-use changes on flood exposure of Wuhan in Yangtze River Basin, China. Water Resour. Manag. 2014, 28, 2507–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Shi, Z.W. Quantifying land-use change impacts on the dynamic evolution of flood vulnerability. Land Use Policy 2017, 65, 198–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Cheng, X.; Jin, L.; Zhao, D.; Feng, T.; Zheng, K. A method for estimating urban flood-carrying capacity using the VIS-W underlying surface model: A case study from Wuhan, China. Water 2019, 11, 2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hubei Government. Available online: www.hubei.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkzt/hbggjxs/201609/t20160914_897363.shtml (accessed on 3 February 2022).
- Liu, H.; Liu, Y. The implementation and contemplation of the urban geographical monitoring based on “the blue book of the geographical information”. Urban Geotech. Investig. Surv. 2012, 5, 8–11. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.-L.; Zhao, D.-Q.; Sheng, Z.; Luo, R. Development and Application of Sponge City Planning System. China Water Waste Water 2015, 31, 121–125, (Abstract in English and Full Paper in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Shao, W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; Yang, G.; Chen, X.; Yang, Z.; Huang, H. Data Integration and its Application in the Sponge City Construction of China. Procedia Eng. 2016, 154, 779–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, Y.; Sun, M.; Song, B. Public perceptions of and willingness to pay for sponge city initiatives in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 122, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scannell, L.; Gifford, R. Personally Relevant Climate Change: The Role of Place Attachment and Local versus Global Message Framing in Engagement. Environ. Behav. 2013, 45, 60–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ardaya, A.B.; Evers, M.; Ribbe, L. What influences disaster risk perception? Intervention measures, flood and landslide risk perception of the population living in flood risk areas in Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017, 25, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Chan, F.K.S.; Griffiths, J.A.; Higgitte, D.; Xu, S.; Zhu, F.; Tang, Y.-T.; Xu, Y.; Thorne, C.R. “Sponge City” in China-A breakthrough of planning and flood risk management in the urban context. Land Use Policy 2018, 76, 772–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The State Council. Guideline to Promote Building Sponge Cities. 2015. Available online: http://english.gov.cn/policies/latest_releases/2015/10/16/content_281475212984264.htm (accessed on 11 September 2018).
- Qasim, S. Khan, A.N.; Shrestha, R.P.; Qasim, M. Risk perception of the people in the flood prone Khyber Pukhthunkhwa Province of Pakistan. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2015, 14, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diakakisa, M.; Priskosa, G.; Skordoulis, M. Public perception of flood risk in flash flood prone areas of Eastern Mediterranean: The case of Attica Region in Greece. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018, 28, 404–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Correia, F.N.; Fordham, M.; da GRAča Saraiva, M.; Bernardo, F. Flood Hazard Assessment and Management: Interface with the Public. Water Resour. Manag. 1998, 12, 209–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Linden, S.L.; Leiserowitz, A.A.; Feinberg, G.D.; Maibach, E.W. How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: Plain facts, pie charts or metaphors? Clim. Chang. 2014, 126, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, L.; Ren, X.; Gu, R.; Che, Y. Implementation of the “sponge city” development plan in China: An evaluation of public willingness to pay for the life-cycle maintenance of its facilities. Cities 2019, 93, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scannell, L.; Gifford, R. The relations between natural and civic place attachment and pro-environmental behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 2010, 30, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Flood Information | 1998 Flood | 2016 Flood | Comparison (Differences between 2016 and 1998 Floods) |
---|---|---|---|
Flood Type | Fluvial (Yangtze Catchment Flood) | Urban surface flood (Wuhan districts: e.g., Hongshan district, Nanhu district) | - |
Total rainfall in Wuhan (mm) | 861.4 | 932.6 | +8.3% |
Maximum weekly rainfall during the flood (mm) | 542.8 | 580 | +6.9% |
Affected populations in Wuhan (×10,000 people) | 177.7 | 105.8 | −40.5% |
Relocated populations (×10,000 people) | 16.3 | 20.7 | +27% |
Flood enhanced property collapse (×10,000) | 1.6 | 1.01 | −36.9% |
Flood enhanced property damages (×10,000) | 6.32 | 0.28 | −95.6% |
Agricultural land damages (×10,000 hectares) | 233.42 | 230.9 | −1.1% |
Direct economic impacts (×RMB 100 million) | 66.6 | 53 | −20.4% |
Drainage power/capacity (×10,000 m3/1 h) | 142.9 | 349.2 | +144.4% |
Donations for flood relief (×RMB 10,000) | 19,000 | 4790 | −74.8 |
Independent Variable | Frequency | |
---|---|---|
This Survey (n) | Wuhan City in 2016 * | |
Gender | ||
Male | 55.9% (944) | 51.0% |
Female | 44.1% (744) | 49.0% |
Age ** | ||
18–19 | 23.2% (392) | 1.7% |
20–29 | 39.8% (672) | 18.1% |
30–39 | 14.0% (237) | 19.4% |
40–49 | 13.6% (230) | 18.3% |
>50 | 9.3% (157) | 42.5% |
Education level | ||
Primary school or below | 3.5% (59) | NA |
Secondary and high school | 21.0% (352) | NA |
Undergraduate | 66.0% (1109) | NA |
Postgraduate | 9.2% (155) | NA |
Unknown | 0.3% (8) | NA |
Residential Time (Years living in Wuhan) | ||
0–2 | 24.4% (413) | NA |
2–5 | 23.7% (401) | NA |
5–10 | 11.3% (189) | NA |
10–20 | 18.1% (305) | NA |
>20 | 22.2% (375) | NA |
Unknown | 0.2% (5) | NA |
Categories | Questions | Effect of Demographical Factors (Yes, p-Value of Chi-Square Test < 0.05; No, ≥0.05) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Age | Residential Time | Edu | |||
General Perception of Flood (part b) | 5 | The seriousness of flood | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
6 | The cause of flood | No | No | No | Yes | |
7 | Effectiveness of governmental water management | No | No | No | Yes | |
General Perception of Sponge City (part c) | 8 | Do you know about Sponge City | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
8a | How do you know | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
9 | Does Sponge City Work | Yes | No | No | No | |
10 | Should this be duplicated in other cities | Yes | No | No | No |
Age (Category) | N | Residential Time (Year) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
25th Percentile | 50th Percentile | 75th Percentile | Average | ||
A (<20) | 386 | 1 | 2.5 | 15 | 7.01 |
B (20 to <30) | 667 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 6.44 |
C (30 to <40) | 235 | 7 | 12 | 22 | 15.46 |
D (40 to <50) | 225 | 15 | 23 | 40 | 26.84 |
E (50 and above) | 154 | 17 | 38.5 | 54 | 36.33 |
Overall | 1678 | 3 | 6 | 20 | 13.39 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zheng, S.; Tang, Y.; Chan, F.K.S.; Cao, L.; Song, R. The Demographic Implication for Promoting Sponge City Initiatives in the Chinese Megacities: A Case of Wuhan. Water 2022, 14, 883. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14060883
Zheng S, Tang Y, Chan FKS, Cao L, Song R. The Demographic Implication for Promoting Sponge City Initiatives in the Chinese Megacities: A Case of Wuhan. Water. 2022; 14(6):883. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14060883
Chicago/Turabian StyleZheng, Shan, Yuting Tang, Faith Ka Shun Chan, Liyong Cao, and Ruixiang Song. 2022. "The Demographic Implication for Promoting Sponge City Initiatives in the Chinese Megacities: A Case of Wuhan" Water 14, no. 6: 883. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14060883
APA StyleZheng, S., Tang, Y., Chan, F. K. S., Cao, L., & Song, R. (2022). The Demographic Implication for Promoting Sponge City Initiatives in the Chinese Megacities: A Case of Wuhan. Water, 14(6), 883. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14060883