Next Article in Journal
Hierarchical Statistics-Based Nonlinear Vertical Velocity Distribution of Debris Flow and Its Application in Entrainment Estimation
Next Article in Special Issue
Biodiversity of Non-Marine Ostracoda (Crustacea) of Botswana: An Annotated Checklist with Notes on Distribution
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Monotonic Relationships between Return Periods of Precipitation Surface Hazard Intensity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analyses of Protection and Conservation According to the Fish Act 1950 in Bangladesh’s Kaptai Lake Fisheries Management
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Pollution on Diversity and Density of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Mountain and Upland Rivers

by
Andrzej Kownacki
1 and
Ewa Szarek-Gwiazda
2,*
1
Polish Hydrobiological Society, Krakow Branch, Adama Mickiewicza 33, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
2
Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Adama Mickiewicza 33, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2022, 14(9), 1349; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091349
Submission received: 25 March 2022 / Revised: 14 April 2022 / Accepted: 16 April 2022 / Published: 21 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aquatic Biodiversity: Threats and Conservation)

Abstract

:
This article summarizes the studies concerning the impact of pollutants on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in the mountain and upland rivers of southern Poland. The Carpathian Raba River, which in the 1960s retained its natural character and had good water quality, was considered as a reference in terms of benthic macroinvertebrate communities. The other two analyzed rivers were polluted to different degrees. The Carpathian Dunajec River was contaminated mainly by sewage from small towns and treatment plant, while the upland Vistula River mainly by sewage from the Upper Silesian Industrial Region and saline waters from coal mines. In studied ecosystems in response to pollutions, a rapid increase in density of fauna caused mainly by the massive development of Oligochaeta was found. In the mountain river, the impact of contamination on macroinvertebrate diversity was negligible. There, taxa considered as indicators of clean water (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera) were abundant and their diversity was similar to that of an uncontaminated river. In the heavily polluted upland Vistula River, the sites with a muddy bottom were dominated by Oligochaeta (99.4–99.9%), while at sites with stony bottoms, apart from Oligochaeta, there were also Chironomidae, Gastropoda, and Hirudinea. In comparison to the 1950s, all Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Odonata, Trichoptera, and Megaloptera were extinct.

1. Introduction

Development of industry and urban agglomeration in the XIX century has caused huge amounts of water consumption and pollution. The protection of human health has made it necessary to develop methods of controlling pollution in the aquatic environment. It has been pointed out that water pollution alters water biocenoses. Kolkwitz and Marson [1,2] introduced the concept of biological indicators of environmental condition. They developed a saprobic system based on species specific to a given water quality class. The system has been modified several times over the years [3,4,5]. Benthic invertebrates are very good indicators of organic pollution and hydro-morphological deficits at the micro-habitat scale [5,6,7,8,9]. It has been found that Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) are indicators of heavy pollution of freshwaters, Chironomidae (Diptera) are indicators of average contamination, and Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, and Odonata are indicators of clean waters [10].
In parallel, studies on the zonal distribution of biocenoses along the river courses have been carried out. The first studies dealt with fish zones in rivers [11,12], and later with zonal distribution of benthic fauna communities [13,14].
The aim of this paper was to indicate how the different degrees of contamination affect the diversity and density of benthic macroinvertebrates in different river types and zones. To realize this aim, we analyzed the results of hydrochemical and hydrobiological studies carried out in the Vistula River (1982–1983) and its Carpathian tributaries: the Raba (1966–1970) and Dunajec (1992–2000) rivers in southern Poland. The mountain Raba River was selected as a reference, because in the 1960s it retained its natural character and had good water quality, in terms of physico-chemical parameters. The mountain Dunajec River in the section between the towns Nowy Targ and Nowy Sącz was contaminated in the 1990s with municipal sewages below small towns. The Upper Vistula River has been heavily polluted with municipal and industrial sewage from the Upper Silesian Industrial Region since the 1960s. Two groups of benthic macroinvertebrates, Oligochaeta and Ephemeroptera, are discussed as the indexes of polluted and clean waters, respectively.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The Raba River and Dunajec River are the right-side tributaries of the Vistula River (southern Poland). The Raba River has a length of 137.4 km and a catchment basin of 1528 km2 with draining waters from the Western Beskid Mountains (Western Carpathians), Carpathian foothills, and Sandomierska Basin and flows into the Vistula River (180 m asl). The highest springs within the river basin lie at 1240 m asl (northern slopes of Mt Turbacz) and give origin to the Olszowy Potok. Most of the catchment basin lies at the altitude interval of 300–500 m above sea level; the average gradient amounted to 4.5‰ (the upper course 23.6–4.1‰, middle 2.7–1.7‰, and lower course 0.6‰) [15]. A considerable part (86%) of the river basin is located in the Carpathians region, with only the mouth part being located in the lowlands [16]. The river was regarded as relatively uncontaminated in the 1960s, although in its basin, five small towns (Rabka, Mszana, Myślenice, Dobczyce, and Bochnia) without sufficient sewage system were located. This research was carried out along the entire length of the river [15,17] (Table 1).
Table 1. Description of the sampling sites at Raba, Dunajec and Vistula rivers [18,19,20,21].
Table 1. Description of the sampling sites at Raba, Dunajec and Vistula rivers [18,19,20,21].
SiteSiteAltitude
(m a.s.l.)
Maximum Wide (m)Maximum Depth (m)Riverbed
Raba River
1Olszowy stream11800.40.1flat stones of smaller size
2Olszowy stream9901.20.2stones
3Olszowy stream7801.50.3stones
4Olszowy stream5804.00.4stones
5Porębianka stream4608.00.6stones
6Raba River37015.00.8stones
7Raba River31520.00.8stones
8Raba River25025.01.0stones
9Raba River21030.01.2smaller stones, thick gravel, sand, mud
10Raba River18530.01.5smaller stones, thick gravel, sand, mud
Dunajec River
1Harklowa638 stones
2Sromowce Niżne487 stones
3Szczawnica430 stones
4Kadcza320120 stones
5Nowy Sącz280100 stony, sandy
Vistula River
1Okleśna215.6801.2sticky black mud
2Łączany reservoir215.52000up to 1.5mud
3Łączany—below the dam209100up to 0.7mostly mud
4Czernichów206.18010–70mud, sand
5Wołowice205.110020–70stones of different size, gravel, sand
6Jeziorzany203.510070stones, mud
The Dunajec River (a length of 246 km, catchment area of 6798 km2) originates in the Tatra Mts in the Western Carpathians of southern Poland (1540 m asl). It flows through a variety of geographical regions differing in geology, geomorphology, and climate [18]. This research was carried out on the sub-mountain section of the river between the towns of Nowy Targ and Nowy Sącz, characterized with a stony bottom as well as fast and turbulent current (Table 1). Until the mid-1990s, this river section had a natural character. It was contaminated by municipal wastewaters from towns (Nowy Targ, Szczawnica, Krościenko, and Nowy Sącz—sewage from the treatment plant), wastewaters from villages, and contaminants from agricultural lands [22].
The Vistula River is the longest river in Poland (1047 km). In the upper course, until the Goczałkowice Reservoir (located 62 km), the river has a mountain and sub-mountain character, while downstream the dam sits in the lowlands. The tributaries of the Vistula, the rivers Przemsza and Biała, carry sewage from the Upper Silesia Industrial Region (USIR) (numerous foundries, Zn-Pb mines, collieries, and large towns), the Bielsko-Biała Industrial Region (plants of textile, chemical, and heavy industry, deep water from a coal mine), and the town Oświęcim (municipal sewage, chemical industry) [20].
This research was carried out in the section of the Vistula River below the inflow of the Przemsza River and Krakow (128–153 km of the river course). The Łączany barrage (dam height 6 m, average water exchange 16 h, located ~133 km) was built with a navigable-energetic function in 1961. About 20 m3 s−1 of water was diverted from the channel to the Skawina electric power station, heated, and discharged back to the Vistula below the studied section [23]. Below the Łączany barrage, the river had largely natural hydrological characteristics [20].

2.2. Sampling Sites

In the Raba River, studies of benthic macroinvertebrates were carried out at 10 sites situated from the sources to the mouth in 1969–1970 [15,17], while hydrochemical studies at sites 6–10 were conducted in 1966–1967 [19] (Table 1 and Table 2, Figure 1).
Table 2. Mean and range values of physico-chemical parameters in the waters of Raba (1966–1967) [19], Dunajec (1990 and 2000 *, data from Provincial Inspectorate for Environmental Protection in Kraków), and Vistula (1982–1983) [24,25] rivers.
Table 2. Mean and range values of physico-chemical parameters in the waters of Raba (1966–1967) [19], Dunajec (1990 and 2000 *, data from Provincial Inspectorate for Environmental Protection in Kraków), and Vistula (1982–1983) [24,25] rivers.
ParameterUnitRiver
RabaDunajecVistula
Temperature°C13.99.114.0
7.0–22.90.2–20.23.9–24.0
pH 7.6–8.57.7–8.96.0–7.6
Dissoved oxygenmg O2 dm−310.711.6 *8.5
8.2–13.47.8–14.21.1–13.1
Oxygen saturation%102.1104.4 *-
90.7–123.076–136-
ConductivityµS cm−1289.1330.8 *4295 **
179–509233–409
Clmg dm−36.813.5837.1
3.8–14.06–23242–1438
SO42−mg dm−325.633.5234.5
18.9–35.814–5678.0–435
Ca2+mg dm−349.245.6 *103.8
31.4–62.932–70.457.2–142.6
Mg2+mg dm−310.59.3 *48.0
7.6–14.35.5–15.517.3–74.8
Na+mg dm−36.98.1 *469.0
2.8–13.24.0–17.0102.4–710.0
K+mg dm−32.32.3 *20.8
1.3–3.71.5–3.55.4–30.0
BOD5mg O2 dm−31.83.516.1
0.8–2.71.3–5.84.0–50.8
CODmg O2 dm−32.44.0 15.8
1.5–4.01.6–8.45.4–28.1
N-NO3mg dm−30.81.60.59
0.3–1.20.5–2.70.10–2.18
N-NH4mg dm−30.1070.293.59
0.072–0.2100.06–0.711.30–8.0
P-PO4mg dm−30.0060.0530.052
nd-0.0240.016–0.0980.021–0.107
P-totmg dm−3-0.047 *1.35
-0.010–0.120.62–14.2
** according to [24].
The studied section of the Dunajec River (between Nowy Targ and Nowy Sącz) included 5 sampling sites (Table 1, Figure 1). The studies of benthic macroinvertebrates at sites 1–3 were carried out four times per year in 1992–1993 [26] and at sites 4–5 in April and August 1999 [18]. The hydrochemical studies were carried out at sites 1, 3, and 5 every month in 1990 and 2000 (sites 1 and 3: January–December; site 5: February–November).
In the Upper Vistula River, the studies of benthic macroinvertebrates and water chemistry were carried out at 6 sites monthly from December 1982 to December 1983 [25,27] (Table 1 and Table 2, Figure 1). Site 1 was situated above the Łączany barrage and had regulated banks, site 2 was in the Łączany barrage near the dam, and site 3 was ca. 200–300 m below the Łączany barrage. Until site 4, the Vistula remains a lowland river with a gradient of 0.3‰, while at sites 5 and 6 it resembles a sub-mountain river. It flows across the calcareous area of the Kraków Upland, has stone overgrown by algae as a bottom, and forms numerous rapids [20].

2.3. Methods

Physico-chemical analysis of the river waters were carried out according to Just and Hermanowicz [28] and Standard Method [29]. Data of the physico-chemical parameters of the Dunajec River water were received from the Provincial Inspectorate for Environmental Protection (WIOŚ) in Kraków.
From each site, 10 subsamples of benthic macroinvertebrates from different microhabitats were collected. From the stony bottom of the rivers, Raba and Dunajec, the samples were collected with a Surber sampler of size 20 × 20 cm (mesh size 0.3 mm). From the muddy bottom of the Vistula River, the samples were taken with a tube grab from an area of about 80 cm2 (2 subsamples of 40 cm2 each), while on the stony bottom they were taken with a Surber sampler. The obtained material was preserved with 4% formalin. In the laboratory, all macroinvertebrates were picked up under 10× magnification, and as far as was possible, identified to the species level. The results are shown as density (ind/m2), number of taxa, and percentage of dominant Ephemeroptera and Oligochaeta species. The first dominant was the species with the highest percentage at particular site. The percentage of the first dominant and other dominant species ranged from 10 to 100% at a given site.

3. Results

3.1. Physico-Chemical Characteristics of the Rivers

The description of water chemistry of the Raba River (sites 6–10) is based on Bombówna [19], the Dunajec River on data obtained from WIOŚ (for 1990, 2000) and Kownacki [18,30], and the Vistula River based on Kasza [25].

3.1.1. Raba and Dunajec Rivers

The water chemistry of the Raba River and Dunajec River were typical for Carpathian rivers. The water temperature of the Raba River ranged from 7.0 °C to 22.9 °C (for spring, summer and autumn) and the Dunajec River from 0.2 °C to 20.2 °C (all year) (Table 2). Usually, the rivers were covered with ice for 1–3 months during winter, depending on the year. Generally, the river waters had high contents of dissolved oxygen (8.2–13.4 mg O2 dm−3 and 7.8–14.2 mg O2 dm−3; oxygen saturation 90.7–123.0% and 76–136%, respectively) and from neutral to alkaline pH (7.6–8.5 and 7.7–8.9, respectively). The Dunajec River at sites 1 and 2 had higher oxygen concentrations than at site 5 (mean 11.7, 12.7, and 9.0 mg O2 dm−3, respectively). The water oxygenation resulted from the primary production of attached algae overgrowing the stones as well as rapid turbulent current (ensuring constant mechanical water oxygenation).
Conductivity values in the waters of the Raba River (179–509 µS cm−1) and the Dunajec River (233–409 µS cm−1) were related to both natural and anthropogenic factors. An increase in conductivity and some ion (especially Cl, Na+, and/or SO42−) concentrations in the Dunajec River was observed at low flow near towns (sites 1 and 5). The ionic composition of the waters were dominated by HCO3 and Ca2+ (Table 2), which included the waters to the calcium-carbonate type.
In the studied rivers, the concentrations of nutrients were N-NO3 0.3–2.7 mg dm−3, N-NH4 0.06–0.71 mg dm−3, and P-PO4 nd (not detectable)–0.098 mg dm−3, and the indices of the organic matter content were BOD5 0.8–5.8 mg dm−3 and COD 1.5–8.4 mg dm−3 (Table 2). In the Dunajec River, the above parameters were higher (N-NO3, N-NH4, BOD5, COD 1.7–2.7 times, P-PO4 8.8 times) compared to those in the Raba River. In the Dunajec River, larger increases in N-NH4 concentrations and COD values were observed below towns (sites 1 and 3) at low flow, indicating the input of municipal sewages. Additionally, in the Raba River, a slight increase in BOD values (similarly like Cl, Na+) at low flow was periodically observed at some sites (6, 8, 10).

3.1.2. Vistula River

The water chemistry of the Vistula River differed considerably from that found in the Raba and Dunajec rivers (Table 2). The water had from slightly acidic to neutral pH (6.0–7.6). Mean content of dissolved oxygen was 2-times lower at sites 1 and 2 (mean ~4.4 mg dm−3) than at sites 3–6 (mean 8.4–9.2 mg dm−3). Below the Łączany barrage (site 3), it ranged from 1.1 up to 11.7 mg dm−3, mainly due to mechanical water oxygenation. At sites 5 and 6, the waters were well oxygenated (up to 13.1 and 12.2 mg O2 dm−3) due to the rapid current on a stony bottom which caused turbulent water oxygenation.
In the water high concentrations of Cl, SO42−, and Na+ were found (Table 2). The concentrations of ions Cl, SO42−, Na+, and K+ (up to 1438, 435, 710, and 30 mg dm−3) exceeded from several to several hundred times (123, 9.2, 68, and 9, respectively) those in the Raba River and changed slightly along the river course (Table 2). The water belonged to the Cl-Na type.
The water (sites 1–6) was rich in N–NH4 and P-tot as well as in organic compounds (mean: BOD5 16.1 mg O2 dm−3, COD 15.8 mg O2 dm−3). The contents of N–NH4 were several dozen times higher than those in the Raba (~35 times) and Dunajec rivers (~12 times). Moreover, N–NH4 dominated (~6 times higher) over N–NO3, inversely to the Carpathian rivers. The highest P–tot content and BOD5 value were found below the Łączany barrage (site 3, mean annual 9.15 and 21.5 mg dm−3, respectively). The slight decrease in BOD5 and COD values occurred at the Łączany barrage (site 2) due to the slow flow, which favors the organic matter sedimentation, as well as at sites 4–6, where a slight improvement in water purity was associated with better water oxygenation. However, the process of self-purification of the Vistula water was very slow. This was explained by the formation of new, slow-decaying organic compounds, similar to humus substances, during organic matter decomposition, which were transported over a long distance.

3.2. Benthic Macroinvertebrates in the Raba, Dunajec and Vistula Rivers

The detailed descriptions of Ephemeroptera (Table S1) and Oligochaeta (Table S2) of the Raba River are based on Sowa [15] and Kasprzak and Szczęsny [17], the Dunajec River based on Szczęsny [26] and Kownacki et al. [18,30], and the Vistula River based on Dumnicka and Kownacki [27,31].

3.2.1. Benthic Macroinvertebrates in the Raba River (Reference Data)

The insect larvae were the main components of the bottom fauna in the Raba River. The most important in terms of abundance and diversity were the Ephemeroptera (66 species in total) [15], Plecoptera (56 species) [32], Trichoptera (73 species) [21], and Oligochaeta (58 species) [17]. Diptera larvae were also very important, especially those from the Chironomidae (55 taxa) and Simuliidae families [33]. Odonata, which inhabited the middle and lower course of the Raba River, were represented by four species [34] and Heteroptera by two species [35]. Mollusca were very rare, and found only as single specimens [36]. Apart from Ostracoda [37] and Hydrachnidia [38], other groups (Nematoda, Hirudinea, and Turbellaria) were not studied. The Raba River belongs to one of the best-known rivers in Europe from a faunistic point of view.
In the Raba River, five zones with characteristic zoocenoses may be distinguished. The zone boundaries vary slightly for particular macroinvertebrate groups. Zonation was clearly shown for the Ephemeroptera communities (Figure 2). In zone 1 (site 1), including the stream section lying near the spring, Ephemeroptera communities were poor and limited to four species Baetis alpinus (Pictet, 1843), Ecdyonurus subalpinus Klapalek, 1907, Rhithrogena iridina (Kolenati, 1839), and R. loyolaea Navàs, 1922. In zone 2 (sites 2 and 3), the diversity of Ephemeroptera increased (13–15 species). The larvae of Baetis alpinus, Rhithrogena iridina, and Ameletus inopinatus Eaton, 1887 dominated. By contrast, Ecdyonurus subalpinus was no longer present. In zone 3 (sites 4 and 5), biodiversity increased (27–31 species). The first dominant was the Baetis rhodani (Pictet, 1843) larvae. Rhithrogena carpatoalpina Klonowska & Olechowska & Sartori & Weichselbaumer, 1987 and Baetis lutheri Muller-Liebenau, 1967 as well as Baetis alpinus, were numerous in the upper part of this zone. In zone 4 (sites 6–8), biodiversity was high (35–37 species). The first dominant was Baetis fuscatus (Linnaeus, 1761), although Baetis vardarensis Ikonomov, 1962 was also abundant. The species that were characteristic for zones 1–3 were not found. In zone 5, biodiversity ranged from 41 species at site 9 to 34 species at site 10. The first dominant was Baetis vardarensis.
Less clearly, zonation showed Oligochaeta communities in the Raba River (Figure 3). Generally, two large Oligochaeta communities can be distinguished. The first community inhabited sites 1–3 and had relatively low diversity (12–18 species), while the second group occurred at sites 4–10 and had higher diversity (17–31 species). Within these large groups, some differentiation of Oligochaeta communities based on the dominant species was observed. At site 1, the first dominant was Mesenchytraeus armatus (Levinsen, 1884), while at sites 2–3, species of the genus Cernosvitoviella dominated. In contrast, in the second group, at sites 4–8, Nais bretscheri Michaelsen, 1899 and Nais alpina Sperber, 1948 dominated, and at sites 9–10, Propappus volki Michaelsen, 1916. Nais communis Piguet, 1906 was the only taxon that occurred at all sites, but usually in low density.

3.2.2. Benthic Macroinvertebrates in the Dunajec River

In the studied section of the Dunajec River, 174 taxa of benthic macroinvertebrates were identified. Like in the Raba River, the insect larvae were the main component of the fauna. The most important groups were Chironomidae (68 species), Ephemeroptera (28 species), Trichoptera (12 species), Plecoptera (9 species), and Oligochaeta (37 species). The remaining groups of insects were identified to the families Coleoptera—three families, and Diptera—seven families. Moreover, at some sites, single specimens of Hirudinea, Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Amphipoda, and Isopoda were found.
The density of benthic macroinvertebrates was the highest at sites 1 and 5, below towns Nowy Targ and Nowy Sącz, (93,000 ind/m2 and 105,000 ind/m2, respectively), a lower one at site 4 (45,000 ind/m2), and the lowest densities at sites 2 and 3 (22,000 ind/m2 and 16,000 ind/m2, respectively) (Figure 4). At sites 1 and 5, Oligochaeta dominated (65% and 90%, respectively), which indicates river contamination. At sites 2 and 3, the dominant group was Chironomidae (~60%), the Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (EPT) consisted of 15–20%, while the share of Oligochaeta dropped to 20%. This indicates the improvement in water quality in comparison to site 1. At site 4, the dominance structures were similar to those at sites 2 and 3. The number of benthic invertebrate taxa was similar in all of the studied sites of the Dunajec River (sites 1and 4: 96 taxa; sites 2, 3, and 5: 109, 108, and 117 taxa) (Figure 4).
The density of Oligochaeta was much higher at sites 1 and 5 below the towns (55,927 ind/m2 and 91,723 ind/m2, respectively) than the other sites (sites 2 and 3: less than 5000 ind/m2; site 4: 7500 ind/m2) (Figure 5). In the studied river section, a total of 37 Oligochaeta species were found. The number of species varied from 12 at site 4 to 25 at site 3 (Figure 5). The Oligochaeta were mainly represented by the family Naididae (21 species), which included the dominant species. At sites 1 and 5, Nais barbata Müller, 1774 was the first dominant (48% and 44% of all Oligochaeta, respectively), while at the other sites, its percentage was below 10%. At all sites where Nais bretscheri (first dominant at sites 2 and 4) and Nais elinguis Müller, 1774 (first dominant at site 4) were present, Nais alpina and Nais christinae Kasprzak, 1973 were accompanying species. The indicators of polluted water such as Tubifex tubifex Müller, 1774 or Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri Claparède, 1862 were present as single individuals. The remaining species of Oligochaeta were represented by a small number of individuals and only found in some localities.
Ephemeroptera were present at all sites of the river section. Their density was higher at the more contaminated sites like site 1 (2720 ind/m2) and 5 (3112 ind/m2) and lower at the remaining sites (1320–1740 ind/m2) (Figure 6). The number of species varied slightly between sites (sites 2 and 3 had 17 species; sites 1, 4, and 5 had 14 species) (Figure 6). Baetis lutheri was present at all sites, and dominated at sites 1–4. Baetis fuscatus was dominant at sites 1–3 and was probably abundant at sites 4 and 5 where juvenile Baetis sp. were found in large numbers. An associated species, which was quite abundant at all sites, was Serratella ignita (Poda, 1761). Other species were less abundant and occurred at some sites.

3.2.3. Benthic Macroinvertebrates in the Vistula River

In the 1980s, a section of the Vistula River from the inflow of the Przemsza River to Kraków was the most polluted along the entire river length. A total of 43 taxa of benthic macroinvertebrates were identified. The fauna was chiefly represented by Oligochaeta (20 species) and Chironomidae (12 taxa). Additionally, single specimens of Hirudinea (three species), Gastropoda (three species), Amphipoda (one species), Diptera (families Simuliidae, Chaoboridae, and Psychodidae) and Coleoptera were found at sites 4–6.
Among benthic macroinvertebrates, Oligochaeta were the most abundant and their density was high at all sites (1–6). Nevertheless, marked differences in the density and dominance structure of Oligochaeta were observed between the sites. The density was extremely high at sites 2 (the Łączany barrage; 290,482 ind/m2) and 3 (below the Łączany dam; 275,953 ind/m2) and lower at the remaining sites (30,018–77,058 ind/m2). Densities of other groups were low: Chironomidae (183–381 ind/m2 at sites 1–3, 1027–16,339 ind/m2 at sites 4–6), Hirudinea (206–440 ind/m2) and Gastropada (245–694 ind/m2) (Table 3).
The percentage share of Oligochaeta was 99.4–99.9% at sites 1–3, 95.7% at site 4, and 91.2% at site 6 (Table 3). Only at site 5, with a rocky bottom and better water oxygenation, the percentage of Oligochaeta decreased to 63.6%, while that of Chironomidae increased to 34.6%. Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri was dominant at all sites, although its percentage was higher at sites 1–3 (71–86%) than at sites 4–6 (21–47%). At sites 4–6, the dominant species was also Nais elinguis (32–64%) (Figure 7).
In the 1980s, Ephemeroptera were no longer present in the studied section of the Vistula River.

4. Discussion

The right-bank tributaries of the Upper Vistula River originate from springs located on the northern slopes of Carpathians. In the upper and middle sections, they have the characteristics of mountain streams and rivers with rocky bottom, fast turbulent flow, and good water oxygenation. Only in the lower section they have the characteristics of lowland rivers, with laminar flow and bottoms covered by gravel, sand, and silt. Until the 1950s, these rivers had a natural character. Currently, most rivers are regulated, and several dam reservoirs/weirs have been built on them, significantly changing the natural characteristics of biocoenosis, including benthic macroinvertebrate communities [30,39]. Comparison of the Raba River water chemistry in the 1960s with the classification of water quality presented in the Regulation of the Minister of Marine Economy and Inland Navigation in Poland [40] indicated generally good water quality (Class I). A slight increase in nutrient and organic matter indices has periodically been observed at low flow at some sites (6, 8, 10). However, contaminated water was purified in relatively short sections, indicating an excellent ability to self-purify. Therefore, comprehensive studies of the benthic fauna communities along the Raba River course carried out in the 1960s [15,17,21,32,33,34,35,36,37,38] showed their natural changes and gave the reference material for the assessment of the human pressure or climate change in the Carpathian rivers.
The Dunajec River between the towns Nowy Targ and Nowy Sącz was also uncontaminated until the mid-1960s. In subsequent years, there was an increase in river contamination, mainly by nutrient and organic matter, especially below the towns [18,22,41]. In 1990, the river water had increased values of the following parameters: BOD5 and N-NO3 (sites 1, 3, 5, below Class II, below good water quality), N-NH4 (sites 1 and 5 below Class II; site 3 Class II, good water quality), P-PO4 (sites 1, 3, 5 Class II) [40]. As a consequence, the benthic macroinvertebrate communities also changed. At sites 1 and 5, the density of benthic macroinvertebrates increased considerably due to the massive development of Oligochaeta, which were the dominant group, while the benthic fauna diversity only slightly changed. The dominant species of Ephemeroptera were the same in the Raba and Dunajec rivers. In the Dunajec River, Beatis fuscatus, B. lutheri, and Serratella ignita dominated. In the Raba River B. lutheri dominated in zones III and IV, B. fuscatus in zone IV, while Serratella ignita was numerous in zones III and IV and dominated in zone V. At more contaminated sites 1 and 5 of the Dunajec River, the density of Ephemeroptera was ~2 times higher, while the number of taxa was slightly lower in comparison to the remaining sites (especially 2 and 3). Similarly, the Oligochaeta Nais bretscheri and N. elinguis were dominant in both the Raba River (zones III, IV) and Dunajec River. Nais barbata was found in large numbers only in the Dunajec River below the sewage discharge from the small towns (sites 1 and 5), but in Raba and Vistula it was found sporadically. Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri (Tubificide) is a common species in various types of aquatic habitats, especially in those contaminated with sewages, as it feeds on organic-rich fine-grained particles [42]. In the Carpathian rivers, single specimens of L. hoffmeisteri were found.
Until the 1950s, the Upper Vistula River had similar benthic macroinvertebrate communities to the Raba River in the lower section. There were Ephemeroptera (Ecdyonurus venosus (Fabricius, 1775), E. dispar (Curtis, 1834), E. insignis (Eaton, 1870), Serratella ignita, Baetis fuscatus, Caenis macrura Stephens, 1835, Heptagenia sulphurea Müller, 1776, H. flava Rostock, 1878, H. coerulans Rostock, 1878, Paraleptophlebia submarginata (Stephens, 1835), and Cloeon dipterum (Linnaeus, 1761)), Porifera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, and Odonata [31]. From the 1960s to the 1990s, the Upper Vistula between the Przemsza River mouth and the city of Kraków was found to be the most polluted section of this river [25,43]. The main sources of pollution were sewage from the Upper Silesian Industrial Region and saline waters from coal mines. According to the classification of water quality [40], the river water at all sites was of poor quality (below Class II) in terms of BOD5, N-NH4, and P-tot as well as at sites 1 and 2 in term of dissolved oxygen content. High conductivity values (4295 µS cm−1; [24]) indicated poor water quality (below Class II) with respect to water salinity. In this period (1983), the sediment of the Vistula River was also heavily polluted by heavy metals. The concentrations of metals at site 1 (fraction < 60 μm, in μg g−1: Cd 138.1, Pb 665, Cu 500, Zn 5287, Ni 112, Cr 370; [44]) exceeded the severe effect level (SEL: Cd 10, Pb 250, Zn 820 μg g−1; [45]); therefore, toxic effects of metals in the sediment on benthic macroinvertebrates were expected. Such high metal concentrations are typical for freshwater sediments in industrial areas or areas exposed to pollution from mining of metal ores [46,47,48].
Such severe pollution has completely changed the benthic invertebrate communities. Oligochaeta dominated, mainly L. hoffmeisteri, which is an indicator of polysaprobic waters and has a wide range of salinity tolerances [49]. Oligochaeta (as a whole) in various types of classifications are regarded as being the most tolerant to pollution [50,51]. However, in contaminated mountain and partially lowland rivers (Raba and Dunajec), the main dominant species were from the genus Nais, which are found in alpha- and beta-mesosaprobic waters [6,10], as well as in uncontaminated rivers. Species of the genus Nais mainly inhabit stones overgrown by algae, which serve as a hiding place and a nutrition source [17]. Propappus volki did not occur in the polluted Vistula River, although it dominated in the lower sections of the Raba River (sites 9–10). This species is typical to clean, well-oxygenated waters of lowland rivers with low concentrations of phosphates and organic matter, with sandy bottoms and strong or moderate flow [52,53].
Since the beginning of the 1990s, as a result of the reduction of heavy industries and mining in Silesia, a gradual decrease in salinity and ammonia in Vistula River water has been observed [49]. In 2014, at site 4, concentrations of K+, Na+, Cl, and SO42− in the water were 1.6–2.6 times lower compared to 1983; Ephemeroptera (Beatidae, Caenidae) and Trichoptera were again found. Moreover, for the first time, Chironomidae were the most abundant group, where previously Oligochaeta dominated [49].

5. Conclussions

In the Carpathian Raba River, with low human activity, the diversity of benthic macroinvetebrates was high and the density relatively low. On the basis of Ephemeropetra communities, five river zones were distinguished. In the sub-mountain section of the Dunajec River, with a stony bottom, fast current, and good water oxygenation, an increase in contamination caused an increase in density and changes in the percentage of individual benthic macroinvertebrate groups. The increase in density of benthic macroinvertebrates was due to the massive growth of Oligochaeta. The diversity of Oligochaeta and Ephemeroptera species changed slightly and was similar to that in the Raba River. Conversely, in the heavily polluted lowland Vistula River, with a laminar flow and a silty-sand substrate, the density was high and caused the massive growth of Oligochaeta. Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri dominated, with this species commonly being recognized as the indicator of the polysaprobial zone. The other groups of benthic macroinvertebrates were found sporadically or became completely extinct, such as Ephemeroptera.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/w14091349/s1, Table S1: List of Ephemeroptera species in the Raba River in 1966–1967 [15], Dunajec River in 1992–1993 (sites 1–3) and 1999 (sites 4–5) [18,26] and Vistula River in 1982–1983 [27] (+ <1%; ++ 1–10%; +++ >10%; X—extinct species, present in the 1940’s [31]). Table S2: List of Oligochaeta species in the Raba River in 1966–1967 (+ <100, ++ 100–1000, +++ >1000 specimens) [17] as well as in the Dunajec River in 1992–1993 (sites 1–3) and 1999 (sites 4–5) [18,26] and Vistula River in 1982–1983 [27] (+ <1%; ++ 1–10%; +++ >10%).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K. and E.S.-G.; Funding acquisition, E.S.-G.; Project administration, A.K. and E.S.-G.; Supervision, A.K. and E.S.-G.; Visualization, E.S.-G.; Writing—original draft, A.K. and E.S.-G.; Writing—review & editing, A.K. and E.S.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data comes from the articles cited in this manuscript. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This study was partially financed by the Institute of Nature Conservation Polish Academy of Sciences (Kraków, Poland) as a statutory activity.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kolkwitz, R.; Marsson, M. Ökologie der pflanzliche Saprobien. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Gesellsch. 1908, 26, 505–519. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kolkwitz, R.; Marsson, M. Ökologie der tierische Saprobien. Beiträge zur Lehre von der biologische Gewasserbeurteilung. Int. Rev. Ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 1909, 2, 126–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Sládecek, V. System of water quality from the biological point of view. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. Ergeb. Limnol. 1973, 7, 1–218. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rolauffs, P.; Stubauer, I.; Moog, O.; Zahrádková, S.; Brabec, K. Integration of the saprobic system into the European Union Water Framework Directive. In Integrated Assessment of Running Waters in Europe; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 285–298. [Google Scholar]
  5. Moog, O.; Schmutz, S.; Schwarzinger, I. Biomonitoring and bioassessment. Riverine Ecosyst. Manag. 2018, 8, 371–390. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rosenberg, D.; Resh, V. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Macroinvertebrates; Capman & Hall: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 1993; p. 488. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sandin, L.; Hering, D. Comparing macroinvertebrate indices to detect organic pollution across Europe: A contribution to the EC Water Framework Directive intercalibration. In Integrated Assessment of Running Waters in Europe; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 55–68. [Google Scholar]
  8. Czerniawska-Kusza, I. Comparing modified biological monitoring working party score system and several biological indices based on macroinvertebrates for water-quality assessment. Limnologica 2005, 35, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Leps, M.; Tonkin, J.D.; Dahm, V.; Haase, P.; Sundermann, A. Disentangling environmental drivers of benthic invertebrate assemblages: The role of spatial scale and riverscape heterogeneity in a multiple stressor environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 536, 546–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Johnson, R.K.; Wiederholm, T.; Rosenberg, D.M. Freshwater biomonitoring using individual organisms, populations, and species assemblages of benthic macroinvertebrates. In Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates; Rosenberg, D.M., Resh, V.H., Eds.; Chapman & Hall: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 1993; pp. 40–158. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nowicki, M. Fish and Waters of Galicia in Terms of National Fisheries. Printing House W. Korneckiego, Krakow. 1880, p. 106. Available online: https://rcin.org.pl/dlibra/publication/34763/edition/19547/content (accessed on 16 July 2019). (In Polish).
  12. Nowicki, M. On Fish in the Rivers Vistula, Styr, Dniester, and Prut Catchment Bains. Four Tables of Fish Atlas is Included. F. Kulczycki Ska Krakow. 1889, p. 54. Available online: https://books.google.pl/books?hl=pl&lr=&id=DEs9AAAAYAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=+Nowicki (accessed on 16 July 2019). (In Polish).
  13. Illies, J.; Botosaneanu, L. Problèmes et méthodes de la classification et de la zonation écologique des eaux courantes, considerées surtout du point de vue faunistique: Avec 18 figures dans le texte et en supplément. Int. Ver. Für Theor. Angew. Limnol. Mitt. 1963, 12, 1–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ward, J.V. Aquatic Insect Ecology. 1. Biology and Habitat; John Willey & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA; Chichester, UK; Brisbane, Australia; Toronto, ON, Canada; Singapore, 1992; p. 438. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sowa, R. Ecology and biogeography of myflies (Ephemeroptera) of running waters in the Polish part of the Carpathians. 1. Distribution and quantitative analysis. Acta Hydrobiol. 1975, 17, 223–297. [Google Scholar]
  16. Materek, A. Hydrologia dopływów i zbiornika. In Zbiornik Dobczycki–Ekologia–Eutrofizacja–Ochrona; Starmach, J., Mazurkiewicz-Boroń, G., Eds.; ZBW PAN: Kraków, Poland, 2000; pp. 15–35. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  17. Kasprzak, K.; Szczęsny, B. Oligochaetes (Oligochaeta) of the River Raba. Acta Hydrobiol. 1976, 18, 75–88. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kownacki, A.; Fleituch, T.; Dumnicka, E. The effect of treated wastes on benthic invertebrate communities in the mountain zone of the Dunajec River (southern Poland). In River Biomonitoring and Benthic Invertebrate Communities; Kownacki, A., Soszka, H., Fleituch, T., Kudelska, D., Eds.; Institute of Environmental Protection–Karol Starmach Institute of Freshwater Biology PAS: Warszawa, Poland; Kraków, Poland, 2002; pp. 29–43. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bombówna, M. Hydrochemical characteristic of the River Raba and its tributaries. Acta Hydrobiol. 1969, 11, 479–504, (In Polish with English Summary). [Google Scholar]
  20. Dumnicka, E.; Kownacki, A. A regulated river ecosystem in a polluted section of the Upper Vistula. 1. Introduction and description of the study area. Acta Hydrobiol. 1988, 30, 3–13. [Google Scholar]
  21. Szczęsny, B. Caddis-flies (Trichoptera) of the River Raba. Acta Hydrobiol. 1975, 17, 35–51. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kownacki, A.; Starmach, J. Ocena jakości wód górnego Dunajca i kierunki zmian pod wpływem zabudowy hydrotechnicznej. In Proceedings of the Symposium Dunajec Wczoraj–Dziś–Jutro, Niedzica, Poland, 15 June 1989; SGGW-AR (Publ. CPBP 04.10.11): Warszawa, Poland, 1989; pp. 96–108. (In Polish). [Google Scholar]
  23. Wróbel, S.; Szczęsny, B. Impoundment of rivers and quality of waters. In The Ecological Principles of Management of the Vistula and Its Drainage Area; Kajak, Z., Ed.; PWN: Warszawa, Poland; Łódź, Poland, 1983; pp. 393–415. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kasza, H.; Galas, J. Upper Vistula River: Response of aquatic communities to pollution and impoundment. II. Chemical composition of water and sediment. Pol. J. Ecol. 2002, 50, 123–135. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kasza, H. A regulated river ecosystem in a polluted section of the Upper Vistula. 2. Hydrochemistry. Acta Hydrobiol. 1988, 30, 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  26. Szczęsny, B. (Ed.) Degradation of the benthic invertebrate fauna of the Dunajec River in the neighborhood of Pieniny National Park (Southern Poland). Ochr. Przyr. 1995, 52, 207–224. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dumnicka, E.; Kownacki, A. A regulated river ecosystem in a polluted section of the Upper Vistula. 8. Macroinvertebrates. Acta Hydrobiol. 1988, 30, 81–97. [Google Scholar]
  28. Just, J.; Hermanowicz, W. Fizyczne i Chemiczne Metody Badania Wody Do Picia i Potrzeb Gospodarczych; Państwowe Zakłady Wydawnictwo Lekarskie: Warszawa, Poland, 1964. [Google Scholar]
  29. Standard Method for the Examination of Water and Sewage; American Public Heath Association Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1995.
  30. Kownacki, A.; Szarek-Gwiazda, E.; Ligaszewski, M.; Urban, J. Communities of freshwater macroinvertebrate and fish in mountain streams and rivers of the Upper Dunajec Catchment (Western Carpathians) including long-term human impact. In Polish River Basins and Lakes: Biological Status and Water Management, p. II; Handbook of Environmental Chemistry Series; Korzeniewska, E., Hamisz, M., Eds.; Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2020; Volume 87, pp. 269–294. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332623114_Communities_of_Freshwater_Macroinvertebrate_and_Fish_in_Mountain_Streams_and_Rivers_of_the_Upper_Dunajec_Catchment_Western_Carpathians_Including_Long-Term_Human_Impact (accessed on 16 July 2019).
  31. Kownacki, A. Checklist of macroinvertebrates in the River Vistula. Acta Hydrobiol. 1999, 41, 45–75. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sowa, R.; Fiałkowski, W. Diversity, abundance, and zonation of stoneflies (Plecoptera) from the water system: Olszowy Potok stream–River Raba (Southern Poland). Acta Hydrobiol. 1988, 30, 381–391. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kownacki, A. Polish Hydrobiological Society; Krakow Branch: Krakow, Poland, 1975; Unpublished work. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mielewczyk, S. Heteroptera of the River Raba, some of its tributaries and riverine reservoirs. Acta Hydrobiol. 1973, 15, 387–400. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mielewczyk, S. The dragonflies (Odonata) of the River Raba, of some of its tributaries, and of riverine water bodies. Acta Hydrobiol. 1973, 15, 379–385. [Google Scholar]
  36. Berger, L. Mollusca of the River Raba and some of its tributaries. Acta Hydrobiol. 1973, 15, 401–411. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sywula, T. The ostracods (Ostracoda) of the River Raba and of certain aquatic environments conected with it. Acta Hydrobiol. 1974, 16, 255–271. [Google Scholar]
  38. Biesiadka, E. Hydracarina of the river Raba and some of its tributaries. Acta Hydrobiol. 1974, 16, 31–50. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mikuś, P.; Wyżga, B.; Bylak, A.; Kukuła, K.; Liro, M.; Oglęcki, P.; Radecki-Pawlik, A. Impact of the restoration of an incised mountain stream on habitats, aquatic fauna and ecological stream quality. Ecol. Eng. 2021, 170, 106365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Regulation of the Minister of Maritime Economy and Inland Navigation of 11 October 2019 on the Classification of Ecological Status, Ecological Potential and Chemical Status and the Method of Classifying the Status of Surface Water Bodies, as Well as Environmental Quality Standards for Priority Substances. Dz.U. 2019 poz. 1311. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20190001311/O/D20191311.pdf (accessed on 16 July 2019). (In Polish)
  41. Wojtan, K. Wybrane zagadnienia fizykochemiczne wód górnego Dunajca. [Selected physico-chemical issue of the upper Dunajec waters]. In Proceedings of the Symposium Dunajec Wczoraj–Dziś–Jutro, Niedzica, Poland, 15 June 1989; SGGW-AR (Publ. CPBP 04.10.11): Warszawa, Poland, 1989; pp. 96–108. (In Polish). [Google Scholar]
  42. Matisoff, G.; Wang, X.; McCall, P.L. Biological redistribution of lake sediments by tubificid oligochaetes: Branchiura sowerbyi and Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri/Tubifex tubifex. J. Great Lakes Res. 1999, 25, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bombówna, M.; Wróbel, S. Chemical investigations on the river Vistula between the mouth of the Przemsza and Cracow. Acta Hydrobiol. 1966, 8 (Suppl. 1), 321–343, (In Polish with English Summary). [Google Scholar]
  44. Helios-Rybicka, E. The role of clay minerals in the fixation of heavy metals in bottom sediments of the Upper Vistula River. Q. Geol. AGH Monogr. 1986, 32, 123. [Google Scholar]
  45. Persaud, D.; Jaagumagi, R.; Hayton, A. Guidelines for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediment Quality in Ontario; Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Queen’s Printer of Ontario: Canada, 1993; p. 27. Available online: https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/xmlui/handle/10214/15797 (accessed on 16 July 2019).
  46. Byrne, P.; Reid, I.; Wood, P.J. Sediment geochemistry of streams draining abandoned lead/zinc mines in central Wales: The Afon Twymyn. J. Soils Sediments 2010, 10, 683–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ciszewski, D.; Aleksander-Kwaterczak, U.; Pociecha, A.; Szarek-Gwiazda, E.; Waloszek, A.; Wilk-Woźniak, E. Small effects of a large sediment contamination with heavy metals on aquatic organisms in the vicinity of an abandoned lead and zinc mine. Env. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185, 9825–9842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Szarek-Gwiazda, E.; Kownacki, A.; Michailova, P.; Ilkova, J.; Pociecha, A.; Ciszewski, D. Does the subfossil Chironomidae in sediments of small ponds reflect changes in wastewater discharges from a Zn-Pb mine? Quat. Int. 2020, 562, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dumnicka, E.; Konopacka, A.; Żurek, R. Changes in the benthic fauna composition in the Upper Vistula over the last 50 years–the consequences of the water pollution reduction and alien species invasion. Oceanol. Hydrobiol. Stud. 2018, 47, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Armitage, P.D.; Moss, D.; Wright, J.F.; Furse, M. The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running water sites. Water Res. 1983, 17, 333–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Aschalew, L.; Moog, O. Benthic macroinvertebrates based new biotic score “ETHbios” for assessing ecological conditions of highland streams and rivers in Ethiopia. Limnologica 2015, 52, 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  52. Dumnicka, E.; Pasternak, K. The influence of physico-chemical properties of water and bottom sediments in the River Nida on the distribution and numbers of Oligochaeta. Acta Hydrobiol. 1978, 20, 215–232. [Google Scholar]
  53. Torii, T. New Record of Propappus volki (Annelida: Clitellata: Propappidae) from Japan. Species Divers. 2006, 11, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Sampling sites in the Raba, Dunajec, and Vistula rivers.
Figure 1. Sampling sites in the Raba, Dunajec, and Vistula rivers.
Water 14 01349 g001
Figure 2. The number of species (A) and percentage of dominant species (B) of Ephemeroptera in the Raba River in 1969–1970 (according to [15], modified).
Figure 2. The number of species (A) and percentage of dominant species (B) of Ephemeroptera in the Raba River in 1969–1970 (according to [15], modified).
Water 14 01349 g002
Figure 3. The number of species (A) and percentage of dominant species (B) of Oligochaeta in the Raba River in lotic and lenitic conditions in 1969–1970 (according to [17], modified).
Figure 3. The number of species (A) and percentage of dominant species (B) of Oligochaeta in the Raba River in lotic and lenitic conditions in 1969–1970 (according to [17], modified).
Water 14 01349 g003
Figure 4. The density (A) and number of taxa (B) of benthic macroinvertebrate groups in the Dunajec River in 1992–1993 (sites 1–3) and 1999 (sites 4–5) (according to [18,26], modified).
Figure 4. The density (A) and number of taxa (B) of benthic macroinvertebrate groups in the Dunajec River in 1992–1993 (sites 1–3) and 1999 (sites 4–5) (according to [18,26], modified).
Water 14 01349 g004
Figure 5. The density (A), number of species (B), and percentage of dominant species (C) of Oligochaeta in the Dunajec River in 1992–1993 (sites 1–3) and 1999 (sites 4–5) (according to [18,26], modified).
Figure 5. The density (A), number of species (B), and percentage of dominant species (C) of Oligochaeta in the Dunajec River in 1992–1993 (sites 1–3) and 1999 (sites 4–5) (according to [18,26], modified).
Water 14 01349 g005
Figure 6. The density (A), number of species (B), and percentage of dominant species (C) of Ephemeroptera in the Dunajec River in 1992–1993 (sites 1–3) and 1999 (sites 4–5) (according to [18,26], modified).
Figure 6. The density (A), number of species (B), and percentage of dominant species (C) of Ephemeroptera in the Dunajec River in 1992–1993 (sites 1–3) and 1999 (sites 4–5) (according to [18,26], modified).
Water 14 01349 g006
Figure 7. Percentage of dominant Oligochaeta species in the Vistula River in 1982–1983 (according to [27], modified).
Figure 7. Percentage of dominant Oligochaeta species in the Vistula River in 1982–1983 (according to [27], modified).
Water 14 01349 g007
Table 3. Density (individual/m2) of benthic macroinvertebrate groups and their percentage in the Vistula River in 1982–1983 (according to [27]).
Table 3. Density (individual/m2) of benthic macroinvertebrate groups and their percentage in the Vistula River in 1982–1983 (according to [27]).
Group of MacrofaunaSites
123456
Density
Oligochaeta64,035290,482275,95342,64630,01877,058
Chironomidae391229183102716,3396745
Hirudinea 206264440
Gastropoda 694561245
Percentage (%)
Oligochaeta99.499.999.995.763.391.2
Chironomidae0.60.10.12.334.68.0
Hirudinea 0.50.60.5
Gastropoda 1.51.20.3
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kownacki, A.; Szarek-Gwiazda, E. The Impact of Pollution on Diversity and Density of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Mountain and Upland Rivers. Water 2022, 14, 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091349

AMA Style

Kownacki A, Szarek-Gwiazda E. The Impact of Pollution on Diversity and Density of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Mountain and Upland Rivers. Water. 2022; 14(9):1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091349

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kownacki, Andrzej, and Ewa Szarek-Gwiazda. 2022. "The Impact of Pollution on Diversity and Density of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Mountain and Upland Rivers" Water 14, no. 9: 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091349

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop