Next Article in Journal
Flow Cytometry as a Rapid Alternative to Quantify Small Microplastics in Environmental Water Samples
Next Article in Special Issue
Refining Assignment of Runoff Control Targets with a Landscape Statistical Model: A Case Study in the Beijing Urban Sub-Center, China
Previous Article in Journal
Monitoring Bacterial Community Dynamics in a Drinking Water Treatment Plant: An Integrative Approach Using Metabarcoding and Microbial Indicators in Large Water Volumes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrating Virus Monitoring Strategies for Safe Non-Potable Water Reuse
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Are Fresh Water and Reclaimed Water Safe for Vegetable Irrigation? Empirical Evidence from Lebanon

1
Lebanese Agricultural Research Institute, Fanar P.O. Box 90-1965, Lebanon
2
Department of Agriculture, The School of Engineering, The Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Kaslik P.O. Box 446, Lebanon
3
Lebanese Agricultural Research Institute, Tal Amara P.O. Box 287, Lebanon
4
Interdepartmental Research Centre on the “Earth Critical Zone”, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy
5
International Water Management Institute—MENA Office 7 Abdel Hadi Saleh St., Off Nile St., Giza 12611, Egypt
6
International Water Management Institute, 127, Sunil Mawatha, Battaramulla, Colombo 10120, Sri Lanka
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2022, 14(9), 1437; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091437
Submission received: 11 March 2022 / Revised: 19 April 2022 / Accepted: 26 April 2022 / Published: 30 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Section Wastewater Treatment and Reuse: Feature Papers)

Abstract

The use of polluted water to irrigate is an increasing problem in the developing world. Lebanon is a case in point, with heavily polluted irrigation waters, particularly in the Litani River Basin. This study evaluated the potential health risks of irrigating vegetables (radishes, parsley, onions, and lettuce) using three water sources (groundwater, river water, and treated wastewater) and three irrigation methods (drip, sprinkler, and surface) over two growing seasons in 2019 and 2020. Water, crop, and soil samples were analyzed for physicochemical parameters, pathogens, and metals (Cu, Cd, Ni, Cr, and Zn). In addition, the bioaccumulation factor, estimated dietary intakes, health risk index, and target hazard quotients were calculated to assess the health risk associated with metal contamination. The study showed that, for water with less than 2 log E. coli CFU/100 mL, no pathogens (Escherichia coli, salmonella, parasite eggs) were detected in irrigated vegetables, irrespective of the irrigation method. With over 2 log E. coli CFU/100 mL in the water, 8.33% of the sprinkler-and surface-irrigated vegetables, and 2.78% of the drip-irrigated root crops (radishes and onions), showed some degree of parasitic contamination. E. coli appeared only on root crops when irrigated with water having over 3 log CFU/100 mL. The concentrations of most metals were significantly lower than the safe limits of the FAO/WHO of the Food Standards Programme Codex, except for zinc and chromium. The trends in the bioaccumulation factor and the estimated dietary intakes of metals were in the order of Cu < Cd < Ni < Cr < Zn. The target hazard quotient values for all metals were lower than 1.0. Under trial conditions, the adoption of drip irrigation with water with less than 3 log E. coli CFU/100 mL proved to be safe, even for vegetables consumed raw, except for root crops such as onions and radishes that should not be irrigated with water having over 2 log E. coli CFU/100 mL. Treated wastewater had no adverse effect on vegetable quality compared to vegetables irrigated with other water sources. These results support efforts to update the Lebanese standards for water reuse in agriculture; standards proposed in 2011 by the FAO, and currently being reviewed by the Lebanese Institution of Standards. This research will inform a sustainable water management policy aimed at protecting the Litani River watershed by monitoring water quality.
Keywords: wastewater reuse; health risks; water pollution; water management; vegetable irrigation wastewater reuse; health risks; water pollution; water management; vegetable irrigation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abi Saab, M.T.; Jomaa, I.; El Hage, R.; Skaf, S.; Fahed, S.; Rizk, Z.; Massaad, R.; Romanos, D.; Khairallah, Y.; Azzi, V.; et al. Are Fresh Water and Reclaimed Water Safe for Vegetable Irrigation? Empirical Evidence from Lebanon. Water 2022, 14, 1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091437

AMA Style

Abi Saab MT, Jomaa I, El Hage R, Skaf S, Fahed S, Rizk Z, Massaad R, Romanos D, Khairallah Y, Azzi V, et al. Are Fresh Water and Reclaimed Water Safe for Vegetable Irrigation? Empirical Evidence from Lebanon. Water. 2022; 14(9):1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091437

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abi Saab, Marie Therese, Ihab Jomaa, Rima El Hage, Sleiman Skaf, Salim Fahed, Ziad Rizk, Randa Massaad, Dany Romanos, Yara Khairallah, Valerie Azzi, and et al. 2022. "Are Fresh Water and Reclaimed Water Safe for Vegetable Irrigation? Empirical Evidence from Lebanon" Water 14, no. 9: 1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091437

APA Style

Abi Saab, M. T., Jomaa, I., El Hage, R., Skaf, S., Fahed, S., Rizk, Z., Massaad, R., Romanos, D., Khairallah, Y., Azzi, V., Sleiman, R., Abi Saad, R., Hajjar, C., Sellami, M. H., Aziz, R., Sfeir, R., Nassif, M. H., & Mateo-Sagasta, J. (2022). Are Fresh Water and Reclaimed Water Safe for Vegetable Irrigation? Empirical Evidence from Lebanon. Water, 14(9), 1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091437

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop