Next Article in Journal
Health Risk Assessment of Nitrate and Fluoride in the Groundwater of Central Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Journal
Risk-Based Design Optimization of Contamination Detection Sensors in Water Distribution Systems: Application of an Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals in the Water, Sediment, and Organisms from The Sea Ranching Areas of Haizhou Bay in China

1
College of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
2
Joint Laboratory for Monitoring and Conservation of Aquatic Living Resources in the Yangtze Estuary, Shanghai 200000, China
3
Marine and Fishery Development Promotion Center in Lianyungang, Lianyungang 222002, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2023, 15(12), 2218; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15122218
Submission received: 5 May 2023 / Revised: 2 June 2023 / Accepted: 7 June 2023 / Published: 13 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Oceans and Coastal Zones)

Abstract

:
Heavy metals (HMs) have the characteristics of high toxicity, long residual time, and difficult degradation, which pose a potential threat to aquatic ecosystems. The distribution and migration of HMs in different media can reflect their potential impact on aquatic ecosystem health. In this study, we analyzed the distribution characteristics of seven HMs (Zn, Cu, Cr, Ni, Hg, As, and Pb) in the water and sediment and five groups of organisms (fish, Crustacean, cephalopod, bivalvia, and gastropoda) in the sea ranching area of Haizhou Bay and explored the regularity of HM accumulation from water and sediments to organisms. The results showed that in the water, Zn and Hg had the smallest concentrations in the nearshore area, Cr had the lowest concentrations in the offshore area, and As, Cu, Pb, and Ni had the lowest concentrations in the central area. In the sediment, Hg had the smallest concentrations in the nearshore area and As, Pb, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn had the lowest concentrations in the offshore area; the average contents of seven heavy metals all meet the Class I standard of sediments in China. The concentrations of Cu and Zn in crustaceans were significantly higher than those in fishes (p < 0.05), and As showed a higher enrichment effect in cephalopods. Under the influence of feeding habits and habitat environment, the BAF value of benthic crustaceans and bivalvia accumulated HMs from sediments is high, and the BAF value of fish accumulated HMs from water and sediments is low. Overall, the concentration of HMs in water is high, and HMs in sediments are in good condition, crustaceans and bivalviaa have a strong ability to accumulate HMs from water and sediments, while fish are weak. Therefore, in order to ensure the safety of biological quality, it is necessary to focus on the discharge of heavy metal pollutants near the coast in the future.

1. Introduction

Heavy metals (HMs) are environmental pollutants characterized by high toxicity, long detention time, and resistant degradation that are crucial in regulating aquatic ecosystems and are potentially hazardous to animals [1,2,3,4,5,6]. In recent years, HM pollution within the marine ecosystem generated by human activities and industries has continuously entered the ocean by atmospheric deposition, surface runoff, etc., causing a severe threat to the offshore environment [7,8,9]. These HMs adsorb and settle into sediments through a series of physical and chemical reactions and then return to the water column in the form of a dissolved state through complex hydrodynamic action, thereby causing persistent pollution to the marine environment and great harm to marine organisms [5,10,11]. Moreover, the strong fat solubility of HMs makes them not decompose and transform once they enter the tissues or organs of aquatic organisms [10,12,13]. This effect will also constantly be retained in environmental media and accumulate in aquatic organisms, and, consequently, the HMs will be transmitted to humans through the food chain [3,14,15].
Even though the analysis of HMs in aquatic environment is essential for assessment, it is often necessary to combine HMs in organisms to determine the pollution degree of a sea area more comprehensively and systematically [14,15,16]. Recently, HM bioaccumulation and biomagnification in marine organisms has been considered a major issue and aroused the interest of a large number of researchers [10,17,18,19,20]. In contaminated marine ecosystems, high-concentration exposure to metals will force marine organisms to absorb some HMs from the immediate environment [16,21]. HMs can be excreted via the gills, bile (via faeces), kidneys, and skin of organisms [22], which not only affects organ functioning but also changes their taste and smell [15]. In addition, specific environmental and biological factors are responsive to the uptake of HMs, which also results in varied bioaccumulation between organisms, seasons, and locations [10,23].
Haizhou Bay is located on the coast of the Yellow Sea northeast of Lianyungang city, Jiangsu Province, with a coastline of more than 170 km. Since 2003, the marine protected areas (MPAs) dominated by artificial reefs were constructed by local government, with a total scale of 291,161.2 m3 and an area of 178.25 km2, for the purpose of ecological restoration and resource conservation [24,25,26]. Most of the earlier studies concentrated on the quantification and characterization of HMs in the water column and sediment in this region [27,28,29], while studies of HM bioaccumulation and biomagnification are scarce and could not provide better feedback.
Therefore, the characteristics of HM concentrations and distributions in the water, sediment, and commercial organisms in the sea ranching areas of Haizhou Bay were determined in this study, and basic information on the HMs accumulated in the organisms from the water and sediment was established. Our research will provide some scientific points and a theoretical reference for offshore ecological restoration projects to further assess the potential risk of HMs in this region.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Description of the Study Area

Haizhou Bay, which is located on the west coast of China Lianyungang city, Jiangsu Province, is an open bay with an area of approximately 877 km2 and mainly composed of sandy and muddy habitats [30,31]. The tides in the coastal waters of Haizhou Bay belong to regular semi-diurnal tides, and the high tide velocity is higher than the low tide velocity. The rising tide flow direction is southwest, and the ebb tide flow is northeast. The coastal waters are dominated by a circulating current, and the coastal waters are dominated by a counterclockwise rotating current [32]. In recent years, as the development of coastal areas in Jiangsu Province becomes a national strategy, Ganyu Port Area has been built in an all-round way, and traditional industries such as marine fishery, marine transportation, and marine salt industry have developed rapidly. At the same time, the construction of several port-adjacent industrial parks has made the manufacturing industry, energy development, biopharmaceuticals, and other emerging industries continue to grow [27,33]. A large amount of domestic sewage, agricultural and fishery wastewater, and industrial wastewater containing heavy metals is discharged into Haizhou Bay through Linhong River, which has caused serious coastal environmental pressure in this area [28,29,34].

2.2. Sample Collection

The survey was conducted (34°52.849′–34°56.117′ N, 119°13.641′–119°33.778′ E) in May and August in 2017 under the marine survey plan by Jiangsu Marine Fisheries Research Institute, and in accordance with the Marine Monitoring Code (State Oceanic Administration, 2007) (Figure 1). A plastic hydrophore was used to collect 2 L of surface water samples, and a dredger was used for the surface sediment samples. The organisms were trawled using single-ship winged bottom trawl (specification 40 m × 94 m/49.3 m), with an average towing speed of 3.0 kn and towing time of nearly 1 h. The organism samples were identified as species (species that could not be identified were listed) and sent back to the laboratory for further measurement (Table 1).

2.3. Sample Treatment and Analysis

Water samples: 50 mL water sample was filtered using a 0.45 μm fiber filter and stored in 50 mL polypropylene bottles. The filtered water samples were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (PerkinElmer, Elan DRC-e, Waltham, MA, USA) for determining HMs. According to the standard of 26 metal element mixed solutions (GNM-M261674-2013, Zhongchangyanbiao technology, Wuhan, China), a total of 7 HMs (zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), mercury (Hg), lead (Pb), and arsenic (As)) were detected.
Sediment sample: After being freeze-dried, the sediment samples were grounded to 100 mesh powder using agate mortar. First, 0.5 g (dry weight) of sample was weighed into the digestion tank with 20 mL HNO3 (ultra-pure, Merck, Germany) and 5 mL HCl (ultra-pure, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) added. An MDS-6 (CEM Mars 6, Matthews, NC, USA) microwave digestion system was used for digestion (the digestion temperature was set to 120 °C for 10 min and kept at 180 °C for 10 min). The digestion solution was placed on a constant temperature electric heating plate to drive acid for clarification and transferred to a 50 mL volumetric flask. Then, the digestion tank was washed using ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ cm−2) which was filtered using a 0.45 μm fiber filter. Finally, the filtered solution was analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (PerkinElmer, Elan DRC-e, Waltham, MA, USA) for HM concentration analysis.
Organism sample: ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ cm−2 Milli-Q water, Millipore) was repeatedly used to remove impurities, and the species were identified and dissected. A total of 2 g (dry weight) of muscle tissue freeze-dried in the lyophilizer was collected for HM analysis. The muscles below the first dorsal fin of fish, the abdominal muscles of shrimp, the first cheliped of crabs, the mantle of cephalopods, the abdominal foot of Gastropodas, and the adductor muscle of bivalvia were taken. First, 0.1 g of sample was weighed into the digestion tank with 4 mL HNO3 (ultra-pure, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and 1 mL H2O2 (ultra-pure, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) added. An MDS-6 (CEM Mars 6, Matthews, NC, USA) microwave digestion system was used for digestion (the digestion temperature was set to 120 °C for 10 min and kept at 180 °C for 10 min). The next process is the same as the sediment sample.

2.4. Bioaccumulation Factor

The bioaccumulation factor (BAF) was used to standardize the variability contributed by the capture site and thus to compare the levels of metal accumulation among all the species collected. The BAF values are calculated as the ratio between the element concentration in organisms at a steady state (μg/g, dry weight) and the element concentration in the water (μg/L) or sediments (mg/kg) [35,36]; the dry weight of sediment and organism samples is 80% of the original weight. It was calculated according to the following equation:
B A F = M e t a l   c o n c .   i n   t h e   o r g a n i s m M e t a l   c o n c .   i n   t h e   w a t e r   o r   s e d i m e n t s
“Metal concentration in the organism” means the average concentration of a metallic element in a given aquatic species; “metal concentration in the water or sediment” means the concentration of a metallic element in a given site of the study area.

2.5. Quality Control and Statistical Analysis

The quality of sample processing and analysis were controlled by reagent blank for the duplicate sample and standard reference sample. Ultra–pure water is used as reagent blank, and standard reference material (GBW080040 for water, GBW07456 for sediment, GBW10050 for Organism) from the Center of National Standard Reference Material of China was used to verify the accuracy of the analysis using the same procedures as that for the samples. The recoveries of all elements were between 90% and 110%, ensuring the reliability and consistency of the measurement. To examine the repeatability of the metal concentration, 10% of the sample was analyzed three times, with relative standard deviation (RSD) between 0.05% and 2.5%; moreover, the quality control analysis was performed with 10 samples as intervals. The concentrations of HMs in all samples were higher than the detection limit of the method (Table 2).
The one-sample Kolmogorov–Wallis (KeS) test was used to assess the data normality. All the values meet the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to analyze HM accumulation, as well as BAF values, in different groups with statistical significance at p < 0.05. All the data were analyzed using Excel 2021 and SPSS 26.0.

3. Results

3.1. The Distribution of HMs in the Water and Sediments

The distribution of HMs in the water and sediments is shown in Figure 2. In the water, the concentrations of Zn and Hg were higher in the coastal area and lower in the near shore, and the concentrations of Cr showed the opposite trend. The concentrations of As and Pb in the central area were higher and in the surrounding area were lower. The concentrations of Cu and Ni in the central area were lower. The concentrations of As are (12.2 μg/L), Cr (11.4 μg/L), Cu (12.0 μg/L), Hg (0.054 μg/L), Pb (11.4 μg/L), Ni (5.2 μg/L), and Zn (57.2 μg/L) for water. In the sediments, the distribution patterns of these HMs were different to some extent. The concentrations of As, Pb, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn in the sediment were higher in the coastal area and lower in the near shore. The distribution of the Hg concentration was rather the opposite and totally different compared to other HMs. The concentrations of As are (17.45 mg/kg), Cr (52.36 mg/kg), Cu (24.93 mg/kg), Hg (0.0156 mg/kg), Pb (33.63 mg/kg), Ni (31.16 mg/kg), and Zn (78.53 mg/kg) for sediment.

3.2. The Concentration of HMs in Different Groups

The distribution of HMs in different aquatic biota (fish, crustaceans, cephalopods, Bivalvia, and gastropodas) in the sea ranching area of Haizhou Bay is shown in Figure 3 and Appendix C. As, Hg, and Zn were detected in all organisms, while Cu, Ni, and Pb were not detected in Lateolabrax japonicus. Pb was not detected in Larimichthys polyactis, Engraulis japonicus, and L. japonicus of fish, A. chinensis of crustaceans, Sepiella maindroni of cephalopods, and Rapana venosa of gastropodas.
The average As concentration of cephalopods and gastropoda was significantly higher than that of fish (p < 0.05) (Figure 3), and the concentration of As was the highest in Neptunea cumingi (151.33 μg/g) and lowest in L. polyactis (1.10 μg/g). The average Cu concentrations of bivalvia, cephalopods, and gastropoda were significantly higher than that of fish (p < 0.05), with the highest concentration of Cu (257.63 μg/g) found in O. denselamellosa. The average Zn concentration of bivalvia and crustaceans was significantly higher than that of fish (p < 0.05), with the highest concentration (2529.50 μg/g) observed in O. denselamellosa and the lowest concentration (24.80 μg/g) in Sebastes schlegelii. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the Cr, Hg, Ni, and Pb concentrations between groups (p > 0.05), among which the highest concentration of Cr (7.93 μg/g) was observed in O. denselamellosa, the highest Hg concentration (1.389 μg/g) was observed in Octopus ocellatus, and the highest Ni concentration was observed in both O. ocellatus (2.13 μg/g) and O. denselamellosa (2.13 μg/g).

3.3. Bio-Water and Bio-Sediment Accumulation Factors

The bio-water accumulation factors (BAFs) of different aquatic groups for six HMs are shown in Figure 4. In terms of As, the average BAF of cephalopods and gastropoda was significantly higher than that of fish (p < 0.05). The average BAF for Cu of bivalvia, cephalopods, and gastropoda was significantly higher than that of fish (p < 0.05). Cephalopods and gastropoda can accumulate more As and Cu from water, whereas bivalvia can accumulate more Cu from water. The average BAF values for Hg of several groups were higher, ranging from 10,000 to 25,000, but there was no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the average BAF of Ni and Pb among the different groups (p > 0.05). For Zn, the BAF of bivalvia and crustaceans was significantly higher than that of fish (p < 0.05).
The bio-sediment accumulation factors (BAF) of different aquatic groups for seven HMs are shown in Figure 5. In terms of As, the average BAF in fish was significantly lower than that in cephalopods and gastropoda (p < 0.05). The average BAF for Cu of bivalvia, cephalopods, and gastropoda was significantly higher than that of fish (p < 0.05). Compared with other HMs, the average BAF for Hg, Cr, Ni, and Pb showed no significant difference between the different groups (p > 0.05), even though they appeared to vary widely, as shown in Figure 5. For Zn, the average BAF of bivalvia was the highest (17,959), which was significantly higher than that of the other groups (p < 0.05). Cephalopods and gastropoda can accumulate more As and Cu from sediment, whereas bivalvia can accumulation more Cu and Zn from sediment.

4. Discussion

4.1. Characteristics of HMs in the Water and Sediments

Under the influence of various complex factors (e.g., seasonal variation, geographical location, environmental conditions, and hydrodynamics), the distribution patterns of HMs in different regions show great differences [37]. Compared with five kinds of heavy metals in the water of the study area investigated in 2009 [38], it was found that the Hg content showed a decreasing trend, while the Pb, Cu, Zn, and Cr content showed an increasing trend. Compared with other typical sea areas in China during the same period, the Hg concentration in Haizhou Bay was lower compared to that in Bohai Bay and Pearl River Estuary, and the concentrations of Pb, Cu, Zn, Cr, As, and Ni were higher compared to those in Bohai Bay, Yangtze River Estuary, and Pearl River Estuary, which indicates that the HM concentration in the study area was high (Table 3).
In this study, the concentrations of Cr were much lower offshore and high nearshore in the water. With rapid economic development, human activities such as waterway construction and river discharge have become the main sources for the increase in HMs in the offshore environment [42], which may be the main reasons for the distribution characteristics. Because the distribution of Zn and Hg are doubly affected by atmospheric precipitation and the rerelease of sediments [43]. The concentrations of Zn and Hg were much lower nearshore and high offshore in the water. The distribution trend of As and Pb in the water was higher in the central area and lower in the surrounding area, which is related to marine engineering activities. The vertical flow velocity of the artificial reef area increases [44], which accelerates the release of HMs from sediments. The implementation of these activities may release HMs to the water column by intervening in the sediments, leading to higher HM concentrations in the water [45]. The distribution trend of Cu and Ni in the water was lower in the central area and higher in the surrounding area, which may be due to the existence of artificial reefs, and the fishing activities in the central part of the country are limited [43,44,45,46]. Compared with other sea areas, the content of heavy metals in the water in the study area is relatively high, and bioremediation technologies such as seaweed can be used to improve its environmental conditions in the future. On the one hand, algae can enrich heavy metals in water, reduce their concentration, and improve the offshore environment [47]. On the other hand, algae have an important impact on species diversity and suspended sediment migration in marine ecosystems [48,49].
For the HMs in the sediment, the average contents of seven heavy metals all meet the Class I standard of sediments in China. Compared with the six kinds of heavy metals in the sediments of the study area investigated in 2009 [50], it was found that the contents of Cu, Zn, and Cr are decreasing, while the contents of Pb, Cd, and As are increasing. Compared with other typical sea areas in China during the same period, the concentrations of As in Haizhou Bay were higher compared to those in Bohai Bay, the concentrations of Cr were higher compared to those in Pearl River Estuary, and the concentrations of seven HMs were lower compared to those in Yangtze River Estuary, which indicates that the HMs in the sediments are maintained at a relatively stable level (Table 4).
The concentrations of As, Pb, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn in the sediments showed a decreasing trend from nearshore to offshore, which may be the result of the interaction of marine hydrodynamic forces, sediment particle size, and terrestrial input [53,54]. On the one hand, it has been recognized that the discharge of domestic sewage and industrial wastewater leads to high HM concentrations in nearshore sediments [44]. On the other hand, the tidal current in Haizhou Bay is a regular semidiurnal tide, and the flow rate at high tide is higher than that at low tide, which is conducive to the transfer of fine grain-size sediments that are more inclined to attach HMs from offshore to nearshore [54,55], resulting in the distribution pattern of high HM concentrations near the shore and low HM concentrations offshore. Additionally, during the migration of fine particles from the offshore area where artificial reefs exist to the nearshore area, some of the particles may be stagnant in the artificial reef area, leading to the migration of some HMs. In the sediments, the distribution of Hg showed an opposite trend compared to other HMs. Some studies have shown that the concentration of organic matter is the main factor for Hg distribution in seawater and sediments, while coarse particles usually contain more organic matter, resulting in a good adsorption effect on Hg [45,56,57].

4.2. Characteristics of HMs in the Tissues of Organisms

The differences in metal elements in different organisms are related to their habitats, physiological characteristics, and specific metal accumulation modes [57,58,59,60]. In this study, the concentrations of HMs in bivalvia, gastropoda, and crustaceans were relatively high. For example, the highest concentrations of Cu (257.6 μg/g), Ni (2.13 μg/g), Pb (4.6 μg/g), and Zn (2529.5 μg/g) were found in Ostrea denselamellosa. O. denselamellosa are sessile organisms that mainly live on the surfaces of reefs or rocks and can accumulate high concentrations of HMs by filtering seawater [57]. Previous studies have shown that oxygen and nitrogen complexes in O. denselamello can combine excess Cu and Zn, thereby facilitating the absorption of other toxic metals (e.g., Hg, Cd) [61,62]. This interaction between HMs may be responsible for the higher concentrations of Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn in O. denselamellosa. The concentrations of HMs (especially As (151.33 μg/g)) were higher in gastropoda, represented by Neptunea cumingi. N. cumingi mainly inhabit deep sandy and muddy seabeds in the subtidal zone and are carnivorous or saprophytic animals that feed on bivalvia and dead fish [62]. This pathway of HM enrichment through the food chain may be the reason for the relatively high HMs in N. cumingi. The average concentrations of Cu and Zn in crustaceans represented by Charybdis japonica and Oratosquilla oratoria were significantly high, which may be due to the interactions between several metals [63,64]. Studies have shown that essential metals such as Zn and Cu play a key role in the expression of metallothioneins, which can combine a variety of toxic HMs as receptors, making it positively correlated with the concentration of some HMs [63,64,65]. The average concentration of As in cephalopods was significantly higher, especially in Sepiella maindroni (109.78 μg/g). A high concentration of As in nekton (e.g., cephalopods and crustaceans) is a common phenomenon, and As is also considered an essential element of cephalopods [66,67,68]. In the experiment of HM transfer between cephalopod tissues, As in the gonads of cephalopods is transferred to their progeny through reproduction, thus showing a higher concentration of As in the progeny. The Zn concentration of fishes is significantly lower than that of crustaceans and bivalvia (p < 0.05). On the one hand, compared with some filter-feeding benthic bivalvia and crustaceans, fishes are less likely to absorb and accumulate HMs from sediments [69]. On the other hand, the rapid growth and metabolism of fish will dilute the concentration of HMs in their body to a certain extent [70].

4.3. Characteristics of HMs Accumulated by Organisms from Water and Sediments

BAF is an indicator that reflects HM accumulation in organisms and is often used to evaluate the toxicity of pollutants in aquatic organisms, thus facilitating the formulation of relevant water environment monitoring standards and guidelines [71,72]. HM concentrations in aquatic organisms are largely affected by HM pollutants in environmental media [8]. In this study, the BAF values of Zn in bivalvia were significantly higher than those of other groups, which may be related to the habitat environment. Bivalvia with weak migration ability and small activity range generally inhabit the sea floor or the sediments. Once their living areas suffer from greater environmental pressure, they often cannot avoid it in time, leading to more HM accumulation from sediments [73,74,75]. The BAF values of As in cephalopods were significantly higher than those in fishes (p < 0.05). Given that cephalopods mainly inhabit caves or crevices of rocky seafloors and move in the water column, they have a high probability of HMs directly from water and sediments [76,77]. Generally, crustaceans can ingest HMs by filtering part of the seawater and sediments, and the HM concentrations in their tissues are greatly affected by habitats [18,19,59,78]. However, we found that the BAF values of Cu and Zn in crustaceans were slightly lower than those in bivalvia and gastropoda (p < 0.05), which may be the result of the dilution of HM concentrations in crustaceans by internal factors such as shell molting [79,80]. In addition, the BAF values of As, Cu, and Zn of fish are significantly lower than those of other groups (p < 0.05), which is due to the wide range and strong metabolic capacity activities of fish in the water [81,82]. Owing to the different physiological mechanisms of each organism and the interaction between different HMs, more uncertainties have been added to the study of the accumulation rule of HMs. Therefore, future studies of HM bioaccumulation should be more detailed and in depth, and the collection and selection of samples should be standardized to make the results more scientific and accurate.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the bioaccumulation coefficient method was used for the first time to analyze the ability of different groups of organisms to accumulate HMs from different environmental media in the sea ranching area of Haizhou Bay. In the water, the concentrations of Zn and Hg were the smallest in the nearshore area, Cr was the smallest in the offshore area, Cu and Ni were the smallest in the central area, and As and Pb were the smallest in the nearshore area and offshore area. In the sediment, Hg had the smallest concentrations in the nearshore area, whereas As, Pb, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn had the lowest concentrations in the offshore area. The average contents of seven heavy metals all meet the Class I standard of sediments in China; the HMs in sediments are in good condition. The concentrations of Cu and Zn in crustaceans were significantly higher than those in fishes (p < 0.05), and As showed a high enrichment effect in cephalopods. The accumulation of HMs in the muscle tissues of different groups is largely affected by environmental media. The BAF value of benthic crustaceans and bivalvia accumulated HMs from sediments is high, and the BAF value of fish accumulated HMs from water and sediments is low. In this paper, the enrichment degree of heavy metals in different organisms is preliminarily explored, and the biomagnification phenomenon of heavy metals in the food chain still needs to be further studied. In the future, the absorption, storage, and metabolism of heavy metals by organisms of different trophic levels can be further studied.

Author Contributions

S.G.—conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis and writing—original draft. S.Z.—conceptualization, supervision, writing—review and editing, resources, funding acquisition. K.F., B.L., J.L. and G.F.—investigation, resources. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Jiangsu Haizhou Bay National Sea Ranching Demonstration Project, grant number D-8005-18-0188, and Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission Local Capacity Construction Project, grant number 21010502200.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. The research was approved by Shanghai Ocean University (SHOU) and the Lianyungang Marine and Fishery Bureau. No artificial reef, natural, and/or other habitats were disturbed during this research. All organisms were killed in accordance with the Marine Survey Code “GB/T 12763.3-2020”. All samples were imported to the laboratory in SHOU under Marine Survey Code in December 2020.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author [Shike Gao] upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the support from the Jiangsu Haizhou Bay National Sea Ranching Demonstration Project (D-8005-18-0188) and Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission Local Capacity Construction Project (21010502200).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Appendix A

Table A1. The concentration of HMs (μg/L) in the surface water in this study.
Table A1. The concentration of HMs (μg/L) in the surface water in this study.
SitesAsPbNiCuZnHgCr
RA18.14.11.12.354.50.03068.6
RA24.39.203.354.90.03598.7
RA38.58.21.02.054.80.03828.4
RA47.19.32.14.155.30.04378.6
RA512.210.02.24.356.90.04488.4
RA610.311.43.09.2570.05157.2
RA712.01.03.210.257.20.0547.2
RA85.111.24.18.757.20.1006.9
CA315.06.14.37.654.00.0309.6
CA22.45.25.110.151.00.028610.9
CA11.04.05.212.038.50.026811.4

Appendix B

Table A2. The concentration HMs (mg/kg) in the sediment in this study.
Table A2. The concentration HMs (mg/kg) in the sediment in this study.
SitesAsCuPbZnCrNiHg
RA18.211.7111.7146.8430.4416.390.0031
RA218.616.2822.0951.1636.0517.440.00419
RA35.4812.0515.3448.231.7715.340.00221
RA414.4124.0233.6370.8649.2430.030.00282
RA51.2311.0515.9644.230.717.190.00227
RA611.8710.6917.8141.5628.516.620.00233
RA79.4315.328.2553.0236.5221.210.0156
RA83.3613.4619.0645.9730.2816.820.00353
CA312.2420.8129.3867.3245.2925.70.0024
CA217.4524.9323.6878.5352.3631.160.00305
CA113.6212.4924.9749.9434.0512.490.00314

Appendix C

Table A3. Different aquatic communities (fish, crustacean, cephalopod, bivalvia, and gastropoda) in the sea ranching area of Haizhou Bay.
Table A3. Different aquatic communities (fish, crustacean, cephalopod, bivalvia, and gastropoda) in the sea ranching area of Haizhou Bay.
GroupsSpeciesAs (μg/g)Cr (μg/g)Cu (μg/g)Hg (μg/g)Ni (μg/g)Pb (μg/g)Zn (μg/g)
FishKonosirus punctatus3.933.170.700.580.170.4766.13
Trichiurus lepturus4.922.092.960.820.952.4944.44
Lophius litulon32.652.780.970.500.65<LOQ41.55
Thamnaconus modestus13.17<LOQ0.381.130.931.9530.58
Scomber japonicus1.950.050.800.830.852.3330.98
Engraulis japonicus7.902.051.850.550.800.00102.45
Jaydia lineata5.620.2213.951.271.320.8787.90
Larimichthys polyactis1.102.204.450.101.700.0025.25
Conger myriaster7.553.552.690.331.080.5544.65
Sebastes schlegelii8.000.771.700.921.000.1524.80
Saurida elongata10.471.480.400.660.380.3236.46
Lateolabrax japonicus20.852.10<LOQ0.35<LOQ<LOQ53.10
CrustaceanCharybdis japonica25.901.2947.010.741.362.24196.33
Oratosquilla oratoria68.8822.48112.650.982.434.50187.90
Acetes chinensis11.803.2512.851.250.350.0089.65
CephalopodOctopus ocellatus59.000.8528.671.382.132.7585.33
Loligo beka16.985.5330.430.330.550.1590.70
Sepiella maindroni109.783.1845.430.251.580.00118.78
BivalviaPinna rudis15.182.832.350.401.051.33750.00
Scapharca subcrenata11.693.143.950.551.541.2394.04
Ostrea denselamellosa59.157.93257.630.532.134.632529.50
GastropodNeptunea cumingi151.330.8330.571.050.754.1877.33
Rapana venosa49.131.333.450.901.05<LOQ79.67
Glossaulax didyma48.883.2062.970.030.351.07121.83

Appendix D

Table A4. Quality standards of different organism groups (fish, crustacean, cephalopod, bivalvia, and gastropoda).
Table A4. Quality standards of different organism groups (fish, crustacean, cephalopod, bivalvia, and gastropoda).
Class I Biological Quality Standard in ChinaZn
(μg/g)
Cu
(μg/g)
Cr
(μg/g)
Ni
(μg/g)
Hg
(μg/g)
Pb
(μg/g)
As
(μg/g)
Bivalvia25050.02.000.301.501.00
Gastropoda25050.02.000.301.001.00
Cephalopod25050.02.000.301.001.00
Crustacean15050.02.000.300.501.00
Fish40.050.02.000.300.501.00

References

  1. Trevizani, T.H.; Petti, M.A.V.; Ribeiro, A.P.; Corbisier, T.N.; Figueira, R.C.L. Heavy metal concentrations in the benthic trophic web of Martel Inlet, Admiralty Bay (King George Island, Antarctica). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 130, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Khan, M.S.; Javed, M.; Rehman, M.T.; Urooj, M.; Ahmad, M.I. Heavy metal pollution and risk assessment by the battery of toxicity tests. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rubalingeswari, N.; Thulasimala, D.; Giridharan, L.; Gopal, V.; Jayaprakash, M. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in the water, sediment, and tissues of major fisheries from adyar estuary, southeast coast of India: An ecotoxicological impact of a metropolitan city. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 163, 111964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mokarram, M.; Saber, A.; Obeidi, R. Effects of heavy metal contamination released by petrochemical plants on marine life and water quality of coastal areas. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 51369–51383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mahamood, M.; Javed, M.; Alhewairini, S.S.; Zahir, F.; Ahmad, M.I. Labeo rohita, a bioindicator for water quality and associated biomarkers of heavy metal toxicity. NPJ Clean Water 2021, 4, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kumar, P.; Sivaperumal, P.; Manigandan, V.; Rajaram, R.; Hussain, M. Assessment of potential human health risk due to heavy metal contamination in edible finfish and shellfish collected around ennore coast, India. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 8151–8167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Golubeva, N.I.; Burtseva, L.V.; Ginzburg, V.A. Heavy metals in the atmospheric precipitation on the Barents Sea coast. Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol. 2010, 35, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khalil, A.; Jamil, A.; Khan, T. Assessment of heavy metal contamination and human health risk with oxidative stress in fish (Cyprinus carpio) from shahpur dam, fateh jang, pakistan. Arab. J. Geosci. 2020, 13, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tao, W.; Li, H.D.; Peng, X.J.; Zhang, W.P.; Lou, Q.S.; Gong, J.J.; Ye, J. Characteristics of heavy metals in seawater and sediments from Daya bay (South China): Environmental fates, source apportionment and ecological risks. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ifti, N.S.; Ayas, D.; Bakan, M. The comparison of heavy metal level in surface water, sediment and biota sampled from the polluted and unpolluted sites in the northeastern mediterranean sea. Thalass. Int. J. Mar. Sci. 2021, 37, 319–330. [Google Scholar]
  11. Leung, H.M.; Cheung, K.C.; Chi, K.A.; Yung, K.; Li, W.C. An assessment of heavy metal contamination in the marine soil/sediment of Coles Bay area, svalbard, and greater bay area, China: A baseline survey from a rapidly developing bay. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 22170–22178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zabetoglou, K.; Voutsa, D.; Samara, C. Toxicity and heavy metal contamination of surficial sediments from the bay of Thessaloniki (northwestern aegean sea) greece. Chemosphere 2002, 49, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, P.; Hua, P.; Gui, D.; Niu, J.; Krebs, P. A comparative analysis of artificial neural networks and wavelet hybrid approaches to long−term toxic heavy metal prediction. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Garnero, P.L.; Monferran, M.V.; Gonzalez, G.A.; Griboff, J.; Bistoni, M.D.L.A. Assessment of exposure to metals, as and se in the water and sediment of a freshwater reservoir and their bioaccumulation in fish species of different feeding and habitat preferences. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 163, 492–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hossain, M.N.; Rahaman, A.; Hasan, M.J.; Uddin, M.M.; Khatun, N.; Shamsuddin, S.M. Comparative seasonal assessment of pollution and health risks associated with heavy metals in the water, sediment and fish of buriganga and turag river in dhaka city, bangladesh. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xie, Q.; Qian, L.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D. Assessment of long−term effects from cage culture practices on heavy metal accumulation in sediment and fish. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 194, 110433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ali, H.; Khan, E. Assessment of potentially toxic heavy metals and health risk in the water, sediments, and different fish species of river Kabul, Pakistan. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2018, 8, 2101–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gashkina, N.A.; Moiseenko, T.I.; Kudryavtseva, L.P. Fish response of metal bioaccumulation to reduced toxic load on long−term contaminated lake Imandra. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 191, 110205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gao, S.K.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, S. The seasonal variation in heavy metal accumulation in the food web in the coastal waters of Jiangsu based on carbon and nitrogen isotope technology. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 11, 118649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, Y.; Qiao, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, L. Assessment of the transfer of heavy metals in seawater, sediment, biota samples and determination the baseline tissue concentrations of metals in marine organisms. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 30, 28764–28776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ibrahim, M.; Oldham, D.; Minghetti, M. Role of metal speciation in the exposure medium on the toxicity, bioavailability and bio−reactivity of copper, silver, cadmium and zinc in the rainbow trout gut cell line (rtgutgc). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2020, 236, 108816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ayandiran, T.A.; Fawole, O.O.; Adewoye, S.O.; Ogundiran, M.A. Bioconcentration of metals in the body muscle and gut of Clarias gariepinus exposed to sublethal concentrations of soap and detergent effluent. J. Cell Anim. Biol. 2009, 3, 113–118. [Google Scholar]
  23. Waykar, B.; Petare, R. Studies on monitoring the heavy metal concentrations in the water, sediment and snail species in Latipada reservoir. J. Environ. Biol. 2016, 37, 585–589. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, S.Y.; Zhang, H.J.; Jiao, J.P.; Li, Y.S.; Zhu, K.W. Changes of ecological environment of artificial reef in Haizhou Bay. J. Fish. China 2006, 30, 457–480. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wu, L.Z.; Wu, W.Q.; Lu, W.; Zhao, M. Exploration practice and prospect of ecological environment restoration in Haizhou Bay−Construction of sea ranching demonstration area in Jiangsu province. China Fish. 2012, 177, 35–37. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, T.; Li, Y.; Xie, B.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, S. Ecosystem development of Haizhou bay ecological restoration area from 2003 to 2013. J. Ocean. Univ. China 2017, 16, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, F.; Xu, M. Source Characteristics and Contamination Evaluation of Heavy Metals in the Surface Sediments of Haizhou Bay. Environ. Sci. 2014, 35, 1035. [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, D.P.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Z.F.; Luo, N.; Wei, Q.Q.; Zhang, R.; Huang, H. Heavy metals in the sediments from the Haizhou bay marine ranching based on geochemical characteristics. Environ. Sci. 2017, 38, 12. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, B.; Wang, J.; Xu, M.; Zhao, L.; Wang, Z. Spatial distribution, source apportionment and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in the sediments of Haizhou bay national ocean park, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 149, 110651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Compilation Committee of China’s Gulf Chronicle. China’s Gulf Chronicle; China’s Gulf Chronicle Ocean Press: Beijing, China, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  31. Luo, F.; Li, R.J. 3D Water Environment Simulation for North Jiangsu Offshore Sea Based on EFDC. J. Water Resour. Prot. 2009, 1, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. A review of the characteristics of the coastal waters in China. Mar. Limnetic Bull. 2020, 21, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sun, M.W.; Chen, W.; Gu, Y.J. Suggestions for Lianyungang to accelerate the construction of modern Marine industry system. Land Bridge Vis. 2022, 16, 4. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rui, Z.; Li, Z.; Fan, Z.; Ding, Y.; Gao, J.; Chen, J.; Yan, H.; Wei, S. Heavy metal pollution and assessment in the tidal flat sediments of Haizhou bay, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 74, 403–412. [Google Scholar]
  35. Authman, M.M.; Abbas, H.H. Accumulation and distribution of copper and zinc in bothwater and somevital tissues of two fish species (Tilapia zillii and Mugil cephalus) of Lake Qarun, Fayoum Province, Egypt. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. PJBS 2007, 10, 2106–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Ziyaadini, M.; Yousefiyanpour, Z.; Ghasemzadeh, J.; Zahedi, M.M. Biota—sediment accumulation factor and concentration of heavy metals (Hg, Cd, As, Ni, Pb and Cu) in the sediments and tissues of Chiton lamyi (Mollusca: Polyplacophora: Chitonidae) in Chabahar Bay, Iran. Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 2017, 16, 1123–1134. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, S. Research progress of heavy metal pollution in offshore environment. J. Dongguan Univ. Technol. 2020, 27, 95–116. [Google Scholar]
  38. Li, F.; Min, X.; Ding, Y.Z.; Xu, W.J. Haizhou Bay water pollution spatial distribution and sources. J. Ecol. 2014, 33, 7. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, P.; Xue, J.; Zhu, Z. Comparison of heavy metal bioaccessibility between street dust and beach sediment: Particle size effect and environmental magnetism response. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 777, 146081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Luo, D.H.; Cheng, N.N.; Yu, S.M. The current situation and comprehensive evaluation of water quality in the Yangtze River estuary and adjacent waters in autumn 2019. Environ. Impact Assess. 2022, 85–89, 96. [Google Scholar]
  41. Jia, J.B.; Zhang, J.C.; Zhang, H.N. Contents of Heavy Metals in Pearl River Estuary and Ecological Risk Assessment. J. Dongguan Univ. Technol. 2021, 28, 7. [Google Scholar]
  42. Li, J.; Chen, Y.; Lu, H.; Zhai, W. Spatial distribution of heavy metal contamination and uncertainty-based human health risk in the aquatic environment using multivariate statistical method. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 22804–22822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Meng, K.; Xu, M.; Xu, W. Sources Apportionment and Pollution Assessment of Heavy Metals in the Sediments of the Northern Haizhou Bay in China. J. Nanjing Norm. Univ. 2018, 41, 99–106. [Google Scholar]
  44. Luo, W.Q.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, Y.Y. Analysis of Marine environment changes before and after the construction of Marine pasture artificial reef area in Haizhou Bay. Bull. Oceanol. Limnol. 2021, 2021, 33–40. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ming, C.; Dai, I.; Zhang, H.; Yan, L. Research on the multi−phase media enrichment characteristics of pb in typical offshore engineering marine district. Mar. Environ. Sci. 2019, 6, 669–673. [Google Scholar]
  46. Deng, X.; Wu, Y.; Liang, Y.; Mao, L.; Zhang, Y. Source apportionment of heavy metals in the sediments of the urban rivers flowing into Haizhou bay, eastern china: Using multivariate statistical analyses and pb−srisotope fingerprints. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 36354–36366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Luo, H.; Wang, Q.; Liu, Z. Potential bioremediation effects of seaweed Gracilaria lemaneiformis on heavy metals in coastal sediment from a typical mariculture zone. Chemosphere 2020, 245, 125636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, Y.; Chai, Z.; Wang, Q. Cultivation of seaweed Gracilaria in Chinese coastal waters and its contribution to environmental improvements. Algal Res. 2015, 9, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yan, L.W. Sedimentary Environmental Effects and Dynamic Mechanism of Kelp Culture in Shallow Waters; Graduate School of China Academy of Sciences: Beijing, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  50. Li, F.; Xu, M. Source characteristics and risk assessment of heavy metals in surface sediments of Haizhou Bay. Environ. Sci. 2014, 35, 6. [Google Scholar]
  51. Yan, X.; Wang, Q.L.; Zeng, R.; Zhang, Y.J.L. Analysis of heavy metal pollution in surface sediments of Bohai Bay and its interannual variation. China Environ. Sci. 2022, 2022, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  52. Shi, Y.Q.; Zhao, X.; Lin, J. Pollution and sources of heavy metals in surface sediments based on total amount and morphology-taking Ma‘an Islands waters as an example. China Environ. Sci. 2019, 39, 10. [Google Scholar]
  53. Wu, P.; Liu, Y.; Li, C.H.; Xiao, Y.Y.; Wang, T. Effects of heavy metals and oil pollution in sediments of the Pearl River Estuary on microbial community structure. Bull. Mar. Limnol. 2022, 44, 106–114. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang, C.Y. Sediment Migration Trend in Lianyungang Coastal Area. J. Oceanogr. 2013, 35, 172–178. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wang, C.; Zou, X.; Feng, Z. Distribution and transport of heavy metals in estuarine−inner shelf regions of the East China Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 644, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, Q.D.; Song, J.M.; Yuan, H. The health status of the Bohai Sea in autumn 2020 and suggestions for the development and utilization of the sea area. Ocean. Dev. Manag. 2021, 38, 8. [Google Scholar]
  57. Wedyan, M.A.; Ababneh, F.A.; Al−Rousan, S. The correlations between mercury speciation and dissolved organic matter in the sediment of the red sea. Am. J. Environ. Sci. 2012, 8, 403–411. [Google Scholar]
  58. Liu, Q.; Liao, Y.; Shou, L. Concentration and potential health risk of heavy metals in seafoods collected from Sanmen Bay and its adjacent areas, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 131, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Baki, M.A.; Hossain, M.M.; Akter, J. Concentration of heavy metals in seafood (fishes, shrimp, lobster and crabs) and human health assessment in Saint Martin Island, Bangladesh. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 159, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tan, Q.G.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W.X. Speciation of Cu and Zn in Two Colored Oyster Species Determined by X−ray Absorption Spectroscopy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 6919–6925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, F.; Wang, W.X. Differential influences of Cu and Zn chronic exposure on Cd and Hg bioaccumulation in an estuarine oyster. Aquat. Toxicol. 2014, 148, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhelyazkov, G.I.; Yankovska−Stefanova, T.; Mineva, E. Risk assessment of some heavy metals in mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and veined rapa whelks (Rapana venosa) for human health. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 128, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, W.X.; Rainbow, P.S. Significance of metallothioneins in metal accumulation kinetics in marine animals. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2018, 152, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yu, H.T.; Zhen, J.; Leng, J.Y. Zinc as a countermeasure for cadmium toxicity. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2021, 42, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lischka, A.; Lacoue−Labarthe, T.; Bustamante, P.; Piatkowski, U.; Hoving, H. Trace element analysis reveals bioaccumulation in the squid Gonatus fabricii from polar regions of the Atlantic ocean. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 256, 113389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Harada, Y. Determination of heavy metal concentrations in squid organs of the East China Sea and evaluation as environmental indicators. Tokyo Ocean. Univ. 2016, 4, 25–43. [Google Scholar]
  67. Yang, C.P.L.; Yan, S.; Bin, B.X. Heavy metal concentrations and associated health risks in edible tissues of marine nekton from the outer Pearl River Estuary, South China Sea. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 2108–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, B.H.; Fang, Z.; Chen, X.J. Research progress of heavy metal bioaccumulation in marine invertebrates. Asian J. Ecotoxicol. 2021, 16, 107–118. [Google Scholar]
  69. Yu, Y.W.; Xu, D.P.; Wang, Y.; Xu, P. Trophic relationships based on small−scale fisheries in the nearshore zone of Jinjiang, Yangtze River: δ13C and δ15N stable isotope analysis. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2017, 26, 2091–2098. [Google Scholar]
  70. Jiang, X.; Wang, J.; Pan, B.; Li, D.; Liu, X. Assessment of heavy metal accumulation in freshwater fish of dongting lake, china: Effects of feeding habits, habitat preferences and body size. J. Environ. Sci. 2022, 112, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mansouri, K.; Consonni, V.; Durjava, M.K. Assessing bioaccumulation of polybrominated diphenyl ethers for aquatic species by QSAR modeling. Chemosphere 2012, 89, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rahayu, D.R.; Anggoro, S.; Soeprobowati, T.R. Metal Concentrations and Bio−Concentration Factor (BCF) in Surface Water and Economical Fish Species from Wadaslintang Multipurpose Dam, Wonosobo, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 593, 012024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, J.; Cao, L.; Dou, S. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals and health risk assessment in three benthic bivalves along the coast of Laizhou Bay, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 117, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wang, X.; Gu, Y.; Wang, Z. Biological risk assessment of heavy metals in the sediments and health risk assessment in bivalve mollusks from Kaozhouyang Bay, South China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 133, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Farrell, H.; Baker, P.; Webster, G. An assessment of potential heavy metal contaminants in bivalve shellfish from aquaculture zones along the coast of New South Wales, Australia. Food Prot. Trend 2018, 38, 18–25. [Google Scholar]
  76. Huang, M.Z. Studies on the feeding habits and trophic levels of four cephalopods in the Taiwan Province Strait and its adjacent waters. J. Appl. Oceanogr. 2004, 23, 331–340. [Google Scholar]
  77. Cui, Y.H.; Liu, S.D.; Zhang, Y.L. Habitat distribution characteristics of octopus ocellatus in Haizhou Bay in spring and its relationship with environmental factors. J. Appl. Ecol. 2022, 34, 1686–1692. [Google Scholar]
  78. Barath, R.; Kumar, K. Trace metal distribution in crab organs and human health risk assessment on consumption of crabs collected from coastal water of south east coast of india. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 141, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chen, M.H. Gender and size effects of metal bioaccumulation on the rock crab, Thalamita crenata, in Dapeng Bay, southwestern Taiwan. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2005, 50, 463–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chuan, O.M.; Ali, N.M.; Shazili, N.M. Selected heavy metals concentration in edible tissue of the mud crab, Genus scylla from Setiu Wetlands, Terengganu. Sustain. Sci. Manag. 2017, 12, 112–118. [Google Scholar]
  81. Gu, Y.G.; Lin, Q.; Huang, H.H.; Wang, L.G.; Ning, J.J.; Du, F.Y. Heavy metals in fish tissues/stomach concentrations in four marine wild commercially valuable fish species from the western continental shelf of South China Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 114, 1125–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mcarthur, J.V.; Tuckfield, R.C.; Fletcher, D.E. Effect of heavy metal pollution on the incidence of antibiotic resistance in Aeromonas hydrophila isolates obtained from the surface of fish. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2017, 79, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The sampling sites. Note: The black dashed box is the sea ranching area.
Figure 1. The sampling sites. Note: The black dashed box is the sea ranching area.
Water 15 02218 g001
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of HMs in the water and sediments. The bubble size indicates the concentration of HMs in the water, and the different colors indicate the concentration of HMs in the sediments (a): As; (b): Cr; (c): Cu; (d): Hg; (e): Pb; (f): Ni; (g): Zn.
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of HMs in the water and sediments. The bubble size indicates the concentration of HMs in the water, and the different colors indicate the concentration of HMs in the sediments (a): As; (b): Cr; (c): Cu; (d): Hg; (e): Pb; (f): Ni; (g): Zn.
Water 15 02218 g002
Figure 3. Concentrations of HMs in fish, crustance, cephalopod, bivalve, and gastropoda. (A: fish; B: crustacean; C: cephalopod; D: bivalvia; E: gastropoda).
Figure 3. Concentrations of HMs in fish, crustance, cephalopod, bivalve, and gastropoda. (A: fish; B: crustacean; C: cephalopod; D: bivalvia; E: gastropoda).
Water 15 02218 g003
Figure 4. Bio-water accumulation factor of various HMs present in fish, crustance, cephalopod, bivalve, and gastropoda. (A: fish; B: crustacean; C: cephalopod; D: bivalvia; E: gastropoda).
Figure 4. Bio-water accumulation factor of various HMs present in fish, crustance, cephalopod, bivalve, and gastropoda. (A: fish; B: crustacean; C: cephalopod; D: bivalvia; E: gastropoda).
Water 15 02218 g004
Figure 5. Bio-sediment accumulation factor of HMs present in different groups. (A: fish; B: crustacean; C: cephalopod; D: bivalvia; E: gastropoda).
Figure 5. Bio-sediment accumulation factor of HMs present in different groups. (A: fish; B: crustacean; C: cephalopod; D: bivalvia; E: gastropoda).
Water 15 02218 g005
Table 1. Different aquatic communities.
Table 1. Different aquatic communities.
GroupsSpecies
FishKonosirus punctatus
Trichiurus lepturus
Lophius litulon
Thamnaconus modestus
Scomber japonicus
Engraulis japonicus
Jaydia lineata
Larimichthys polyactis
Conger myriaster
Sebastes schlegelii
Saurida elongata
Lateolabrax japonicus
CrustaceanCharybdis japonica
Oratosquilla oratoria
Acetes chinensis
CephalopodOctopus ocellatus
Loligo beka
Sepiella maindroni
BivalviaPinna rudis
Scapharca subcrenata
Ostrea denselamellosa
GastropodaNeptunea cumingi
Rapana venosa
Glossaulax didyma
Table 2. The detection limit of different elements measured by ICP-MS.
Table 2. The detection limit of different elements measured by ICP-MS.
ElementsWater
(μg/L)
Sediment
(mg/kg)
Organism
(μg/g)
As0.0920.005
Cr0.050.40.018
Cu0.080.60.025
Hg0.0010.0010.001
Pb0.0920.005
Ni0.0610.002
Zn0.6710.008
Table 3. Comparison of HM concentration (μg/L) in the surface water of Haizhou Bay and typical sea areas in China.
Table 3. Comparison of HM concentration (μg/L) in the surface water of Haizhou Bay and typical sea areas in China.
CuPbZnCrAsHgNiReference
Haizhou BayRange0–12.00–11.038.5–57.34.30–11.40–15.00.0268–0.100–3.0This study
Average6.506.3654.18.706.270.0442.70
Bohai Bay2.900.4010.11.973.880.63n.d.[39]
Changjiang Estuary2.300.9119.01.301.0n.d.n.d.[40]
Zhujiang Estuary1.950.5514.82.291.990.0442.44[41]
Class I standard of seawater in China512050200.05
Note: n.d. means untested.
Table 4. Comparison of HM concentration (mg/kg) in the sediments in Haizhou Bay and typical sea areas in China.
Table 4. Comparison of HM concentration (mg/kg) in the sediments in Haizhou Bay and typical sea areas in China.
CuPbZnCrAsHgNiReference
Haizhou BayRange10.7–25.28.25–33.641.6–78.528.5–57.53.36–18.60.0022–0.015612.5–37.2This study
Average16.520.657.438.611.10.00421.5
Bohai Bay22.921.263.550.46.60.026n.d.[51]
Changjiang Estuary19.225.468.163.711.6n.d.36.7[52]
Zhujiang Estuary61.146.2157.721.722.10.104n.d.[53]
Class I standard for sediments in China356015080200.2
Note: n.d. means untested.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, S.; Fu, K.; Gao, S.; Liang, B.; Lu, J.; Fu, G. Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals in the Water, Sediment, and Organisms from The Sea Ranching Areas of Haizhou Bay in China. Water 2023, 15, 2218. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15122218

AMA Style

Zhang S, Fu K, Gao S, Liang B, Lu J, Fu G. Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals in the Water, Sediment, and Organisms from The Sea Ranching Areas of Haizhou Bay in China. Water. 2023; 15(12):2218. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15122218

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Shuo, Kang Fu, Shike Gao, Baogui Liang, Jikun Lu, and Guanghui Fu. 2023. "Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals in the Water, Sediment, and Organisms from The Sea Ranching Areas of Haizhou Bay in China" Water 15, no. 12: 2218. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15122218

APA Style

Zhang, S., Fu, K., Gao, S., Liang, B., Lu, J., & Fu, G. (2023). Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals in the Water, Sediment, and Organisms from The Sea Ranching Areas of Haizhou Bay in China. Water, 15(12), 2218. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15122218

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop