Next Article in Journal
Models and Interpretation Methods for Single-Hole Flowmeter Experiments
Next Article in Special Issue
What Drives the Morphological Traits of Stress-Tolerant Plant Cynodon dactylon in a Riparian Zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China
Previous Article in Journal
Phototropic Behavioral Responses of Zooplankton in Lake Baikal In Situ and during the Anthropogenic Impact Modeling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantifying the Impact of Changes in Sinuosity on River Ecosystems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biochar/Clay Composite Particle Immobilized Compound Bacteria: Preparation, Collaborative Degradation Performance and Environmental Tolerance

1
Ministry of Natural Resources, Fourth Institute of Oceanography, Beihai 536000, China
2
Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Ecosystem and Bioresource, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beihai 536000, China
3
Guangxi Beibu Gulf Key Laboratory of Marine Resources, Environment and Sustainable Development, Beihai 536000, China
4
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control, Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2023, 15(16), 2959; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15162959
Submission received: 13 July 2023 / Revised: 7 August 2023 / Accepted: 14 August 2023 / Published: 16 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impact of Environmental Factors on Aquatic Ecosystem)

Abstract

:
Immobilized microbial materials can effectively remove pollutants from surface water, and a biochar/clay composite particle (BCCP) material is prepared with immobilized Flavobacterium mizutaii sp. and Aquamicrobium sp. to remove ammonia nitrogen (NH4+–N) and petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs). The results indicated that the optimal ratios of biochar, Na2SiO3 and NaHCO3 were 15%, 3%, and 3%, and the adsorption process was found to be better described with the pseudo-second-order kinetic equation. The individual immobilization of Flavobacterium mizutaii sp. and Aquamicrobium sp. with sodium alginate–polyvinyl alcohol (PVA + SA) achieved 80% and 90% removal efficiencies for NH4+–N and PHCs at the 10th d. The composite immobilization of two efficient bacteria could degrade 82.48% NH4+–N and 74.62% PHCs. In addition, immobilization relieved the effects of temperature and salinity. This study can provide guidance for the application of immobilized microbial composite materials in natural water environments.

1. Introduction

Wetland systems are special zones between marine and terrestrial ecosystems that play a crucial role in maintaining ecological balance [1]. The Liaohe Estuarine Wetland (LEW) is an important crab breeding area and also a reused oil extraction area. In recent years, aquaculture and oil exploration have led to excessive emissions of ammonia nitrogen (NH4+–N) and severe petroleum pollution in wetland water systems, resulting in damage to the living environment of river crabs and affecting the ecological environment of wetlands [2]. Therefore, it is particularly important to control the concentrations of NH4+–N and petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) in wetlands.
Secondary pollution during the removal of NH4+–N and PHCs from surface water using conventional chemical methods used in wastewater treatment plants renders these methods unsuitable. The adsorption method has a wide application range and good treatment performance. Previous studies have shown that the use of biochar and clay to prepare biochar/clay composite particles (BCCP) to adsorb NH4+–N has a significant effect [3]. However, adsorption alone cannot completely degrade petroleum pollutants such as PHCs. With the development of biotechnology, many microbial strains can be screened and applied for the degradation of NH4+–N and PHCs. Flavobacterium mizutaii sp. was reported as a predominant bacterial genus in the denitrification process and can effectively degrade NH4+–N in water [4]. Aquamicrobium sp. was found to be effective in degrading alkanes [5]. However, the use of high-efficiency bacterial agents is affected by the persistence of residence in freely flowing water bodies. Using BCCP as a carrier to immobilize efficient bacterial communities on BCCP can effectively maintain the concentration of microorganisms and provide pollutant degradation effects [6]. Meanwhile, environmental factors, such as salinity and temperature, restrict pollutant degradation, and it is necessary to study the degradation of pollutants by immobilized bacteria technology in wetlands [6]. The activity of nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) gradually decreased as the salinity increased from approximately zero to 35.0 g/L [7]. When the temperature was lower than the optimal temperature, it affected the growth rate of bacteria, while higher temperatures reduced protein activity and even lead to cell death [8].
Sodium alginate (SA) and sodium alginate–polyvinyl alcohol (PVA + SA) as crosslinking materials can protect the bacteria against the intrusion of the environment [9]. Reddy and Osborne 2020 immobilized Pseudomonas guariconensis in the biocarrier matrix to degrade Reactive red 120, and the degradation efficiency could reach 91% [10]. Yan et al., 2020 found that the degradation efficiency of Ca2+ and Mg2+ can reach 90% and 70% under the action of immobilized Lysinibacillus fusiformis DB1-3 bacteria [11]. Hence, immobilization technology has good performance on the microbial degradation of pollutants. The previous research showed that the immobilized ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) could resist the influence of low temperature and maintained a good degradation efficiency [12]. However, LEW has received severe combined pollution of PHCs and NH4+–N, and whether immobilized composite microbial communities still have good effects is unknown. Hence, the degradation performance of combined immobilization of oil degrading bacteria and AOB needs further research.
In addition, the LEW is located in northern China and is affected by low temperature, high salinity and tides. The application of high-efficiency degrading bacteria is a challenge. Therefore, immobilization methods with BCCP do not only resist low temperature and high salinity but also avoid being dispersed by tides in the wetland. Immobilized BCCP is an effective method to solve the above problems, and its tolerance to low temperature and high salt needs to be further explored.
In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of immobilized microbial composite materials in removing NH4+–N and PHCs in wetland environments. (1) Orthogonal experiments and adsorption kinetics were studied to explore the optimal formulation of BCCP, and the adsorption effectiveness of BCCP on NH4+–N was investigated. (2) The degradation efficiency of NH4+–N and PHCs by BCCP immobilized with Flavobacterium mizutaii sp. and Aquamicrobium sp. was studied. (3) The tolerance to low temperatures and high salinity on the immobilized microorganisms was examined. This experiment can provide guidance for the application of immobilized microbial composite materials in wetlands.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of BCCP

Clay and reed stalk materials were obtained from the LEW. The reed stalks were repeatedly washed with deionized water to remove impurities. Then, they were placed in a crucible and dried at 105 °C for 24 h to eliminate any remaining moisture and impurities. The dried reed stalks were ground into powder using a mini plant grinder (FZ 102, Beijing Weiye, Nanhai, China), and the resulting powder was sieved to obtain particles with a size of 0.85 mm for further use. The reed stalk powder was subjected to carbonization in a pyrolyzer under a constant oxygen-limited condition with a heating rate of 10 °C per minute. The carbonization process was carried out at 600 °C for 3 h. Subsequently, the biochar and clay samples were crushed and sieved to obtain a uniform particle size of 0.15 mm. The biochar samples were dried at 105 °C for 24 h and then sealed in brown containers. Prior to use, they were rinsed multiple times with deionized water to remove any remaining ash content. Detailed information regarding the characteristics of the biochar can be found in [3]. The specific preparation process of the biochar/clay is shown in Figure 1.
The formulation for the preparation of BCCP includes the base amount of binder, the amount of Na2SiO3 and the amount of NaHCO3. An orthogonal experiment, L9 (34), was conducted to optimize the best preparation method. The levels of the orthogonal experiment for the preparation formulation are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Flavobacterium mizutaii sp. and Aquamicrobium sp.

The screening methods for Flavobacterium mizutaii sp. and Aquamicrobium sp. can be found in Huang et al., 2017 and Huang et al., 2022 [13,14]. The 16S rDNA gene of strain HXN-2 has been cloned and sequenced using the SeqMatch program in RDP (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/ (accessed on 10 July 2023)). In Figure 2, it has been classified that HXN-2 shows a 95% similarity to the 16S rDNA gene of Aquamicrobium sp. genus [13].
The 16S rDNA gene of strain SY-I has been cloned and sequenced, and the gene sequence has been submitted to GenBank. Using the SeqMatch program in RDP (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/ (accessed on 10 July 2023)) and conducting a BLAST analysis against the online database, it was found that SY-I shows a 94% similarity to the 16S rDNA gene of Flavobacterium mizutaii sp. Through searching for other closely related strains to SY-I and using software such as MNGA, a 16S rDNA phylogenetic tree has been constructed. Table 2 shows the physiological and chemical reactions of high-efficiency degrading bacteria.

2.3. Adsorption kinetics of NH4+–N by BCCP

In order to comprehensively understand the adsorption kinetics characteristics of biochar spheres on NH4+–N, this study used the pseudo-first-order kinetic Equation (1), pseudo-second-order kinetic Equation (2) and intra-particle diffusion model (3) to fit the experimental data.
q t = q e ( 1 e k 1 t )
t q t = 1 k 2 q e 2 + t q e
q t = k p t + C
In the equations, k1 represents the rate constant of the pseudo-first-order kinetic equation, min−1; k2 represents the rate constant of the pseudo-second-order kinetic equation, g/mg min; kp represents the rate constant of intra-particle diffusion, mg/g min0.5; qe represents the adsorption capacity of the biochar spheres, expressed in mg/g; and qt represents the adsorption capacity of the biochar spheres at time t, mg/g.

2.4. Preparation of Immobilized Compound Bacteria

A 2% SA solution and a 12% PVA solution were prepared with deionized water. Then, a certain amount of CaCl2 was weighed and dissolved in deionized water to prepare a 2% CaCl2 solution. Both solutions dissolved in a constant-temperature water bath at 100 °C, and the solution was then sterilized at 121 °C and high pressure for 30 min. Flavobacterium mizutaii sp. and Aquamicrobium sp. were concentrated using a centrifuge at 4000 rpm, 20 °C for 10 min once they were cultured in logarithmic growth phase (OD600≈0.6). The supernatant was discarded and rinsed with sterile water to remove surface nutrients, and this process was repeated 2–3 times. The cultured and concentrated bacterial strains were mixed with the embedding material in a 1:2 ratio to obtain an embedding mixture. In addition, the BCCP was added into the embedding mixture and then removed into a 2% CaCl2 solution, where gel particles formed. The prepared gel particles were placed in the sterilized CaCl2 solution and then crosslinked in a refrigerator at 4 °C for 24 h.

2.5. Degradation of NH4+–N and PHCs by Immobilized Compound Bacteria

The experiment involved the addition of four different treatments to a 100 mL solution containing NH4+–N at a concentration of 50 mg L−1 and PHCs at a concentration of 1000 mg L−1. The treatments included the following: (1) Control group: addition of BCCP alone; (2) FB group: addition of free bacteria; (3) P-B group: addition of BCCP followed by the adsorption of bacterial species; and (4) P-B-SA + PVA group: addition of BCCP with SA+PVA encapsulated bacterial species. The experiment was run continuously for 10 d to investigate the removal efficiency of NH4+–N and PHCs. The concentration of NH4+–N in the effluent was detected every day, and a sample of the effluent was taken every 3 days to test for PHCs.

2.6. Tolerances of Low Temperature and High Salinity

The preparation of high-efficiency bacteria with SA+PVA immobilized BCCP particles was based on the above immobilization method. They were placed separately under temperature conditions of 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 °C as well as salinity conditions of 10‰, 15‰, 20‰, 25‰, 30‰ and 35‰ They were run continuously to investigate the performance of temperature and salinity on NH4+–N and PHCs degradation.

2.7. Analysis Methods

The determination method for NH4+–N involves using Nessler’s reagent and spectrophotometry. The analysis method for PHCs is as follows. Transfer the test water sample along with 2.0 g of anhydrous sulfuric acid to a 250 mL separating funnel and mix well. Add 10 mL of n-hexane and rinse the sample bottle twice with 10 mL of n-hexane; then, transfer all the rinsing solution to the separating funnel. Shake the separating funnel for 5 min (release any trapped gas), and let it stand for 10 min. After sufficient phase separation between the extract and the water sample, transfer the lower aqueous layer back to the original water sample bottle. Use filter paper to remove any moisture from the neck of the separating funnel. Transfer the n-hexane extract to a 50 mL stoppered colorimetric tube. Repeat the process two more times to ensure complete extraction of PHCs from the test sample. Transfer the extract to a 1 cm quartz cuvette and measure the absorbance (A) at a wavelength of 225 nm using n-hexane as a reference. Record the measured data and calculate the concentration of PHCs in the water sample according to Formula (4):
C o i l = Q V 1 V 2
In the formula, Coil represents the concentration of oil in the water sample, mg L−1; Q represents the concentration of oil in the n-hexane extract obtained from the standard curve, mg L−1; V1 represents the volume of n-hexane extraction solvent, mL; and V2 represents the volume of the sample, mL.

3. Results

3.1. Preparation and Condition Optimization of BCCP

3.1.1. Effect of Preparation Formula on the Adsorption Characteristics of NH4+–N

The control of the preparation formula (biochar dosage, Na2SiO3 dosage and NaHCO3 dosage) could change the surface structure of biochar to a certain extent and affect its adsorption performance for NH4+–N [15]. Therefore, in this study, the orthogonal experiment method was used to investigate the effect of the BCCP preparation formula on NH4+–N adsorption (Table 3). The preparation formula of BCCP had a great influence on the adsorption of NH4+–N. The minimum adsorption capacity was 0.452 mg/g; the maximum was 0.538 mg/g. With the dosage increase of the biochar, Na2SiO3 and NaHCO3, the adsorption capacity of the prepared biochar spheres showed an increasing trend. When the dosage ratio of biochar, Na2SiO3 and NaHCO3 was 15%, 3% and 3%, the adsorption capacity of the biochar spheres was the largest, which was 0.528, 0.500 and 0.506 mg/g, respectively. This may be because the increase in biochar dosage increases the specific surface area of the biochar spheres and the porosity of the biochar spheres, which increases the adsorption capacity of the biochar spheres. The addition of the Na2SiO3 crosslinking agent increased the interlayer distance of the clay on the basis of maintaining the original layered structure of the clay. Meanwhile, the addition of Na2SiO3 increased the amount of Na2SiO3 to generate NaHCO3 with CO2 in the air [3]. After the decomposition of Na2CO3 at high temperature, CO2 was released, which promoted the formation of a microporous structure of the biochar spheres, thereby increasing the adsorption capacity of the biochar spheres [16]. NaHCO3 is decomposed into CO2 at high temperature, which further increases the porosity of the material and enhances the adsorption capacity of NH4+–N.
Table 4 shows the range analysis of NH4+–N adsorption by BCCP preparation formula, and the primary and secondary relationships of the influence of three factors on NH4+–N adsorption were judged by the range. Through the experimental results T3 > T1 > T2, it showed that the primary and secondary relationships affecting the adsorption capacity of the biochar spheres were CAB (NaHCO3 dosage > biochar dosage > Na2SiO3 dosage). Through the analysis of the influence of each factor, it was concluded that A3B3C3 was the best biochar configuration formula, and the corresponding parameters were biochar 15%, Na2SiO3 3% and NaHCO3 3%.

3.1.2. Effect of Raw Material Ratio on NH4+–N Adsorption

By fitting the experimental data of different biochar dosages and different NaHCO3 dosages, the quasi-first-order kinetic equation, quasi-second-order kinetic equation and intra-particle diffusion model of NH4+–N adsorption by the biochar spheres were obtained. The kinetic model parameters and correlation coefficients are shown in Table 5 and Table 6, respectively. By comparing the correlation coefficients, the quasi-second-order kinetic equation is more suitable for the adsorption of NH4+–N by BCCP than the quasi-first-order kinetic equation and the intra-particle diffusion equation under the conditions of different biochar dosages and different NaHCO3 dosages. Intra-particle diffusion is not the control step to control the adsorption rate.
The pseudo-second-order kinetic equation can better describe the adsorption process of NH4+–N by the biochar spheres [17]. The model includes all the processes of biochar sphere adsorption, namely external membrane diffusion, surface adsorption and intraparticle diffusion. Compared with the pseudo-first-order kinetic model, the formation of chemical bonds affects the pseudo-second-order kinetic adsorption and is the main reason [18], indicating that the adsorption process of BCCP on NH4+–N is mainly chemical adsorption.
The adsorption process of BCCP can be divided into three stages, namely external diffusion, internal diffusion (pore internal diffusion) and adsorption reaction stage, and finally, the adsorption equilibrium is reached [19]. In the internal diffusion model, it indicates that the internal diffusion is the rate-determining step of the reaction during the adsorption process. However, the internal diffusion fitting curve did not pass the coordinate origin in this study, which indicated that the internal diffusion was not the only rate-determining step in the adsorption process of NH4+–N by BCCP.

3.2. Performances of Individual AOB and Petroleum-Degrading Bacteria Immobilization

As a carrier for microbial immobilization, BCCP can avoid the dispersion of free bacteria and reduce its pollutant degradation performance, which is a common and effective method [20]. However, whether immobilization becomes the main controlling factor limiting the conversion of pollutants needs further research. In this study, the individual immobilization of AOB and petroleum-degrading bacteria were studied to discuss the degradation efficiency of NH4+–N and PHCs, and the results are shown in Figure 3A,B.

3.2.1. NH4+–N Removal Performance with Immobilized Flavobacterium mizutaii sp.

Figure 3A demonstrates the degradation performance of BCCP-immobilized AOB on NH4+–N. The removal efficiency of NH4+–N in the control group (only added BCCP) was stable at approximately 30%. The control group did not add bacteria but had a certain adsorption effect, which relied on the adsorption of the BCCP themselves. In the experimental group of (FB) (only free bacteria and no composite particles), the effect was little in the first 2 d, and the degradation efficiency was less than 10%. Then, with the time extending, the degradation efficiency continued to increase and reached 65.74% at 10 d.
The experimental groups of P-B (BCCP adsorbed the bacteria) and the SA + PVA combined embedding bacteria increased with the time extending and reached more than 80% at 10 d. The NH4+–N rapid adsorption performance of the P-B and P-B-SA + PVA groups at the beginning resulted in a higher removal performance than free bacteria. However, the effect of the P-B-SA + PVA group is lower than that of the P-B group after a period of time, and then the removal efficiency of the P-B-SA + PVA group restored and equivalented to the P-B group with the further extension of the reaction time. It indicated that the embedding first had a certain inhibitory effect on the experiment, and then the permeability became stronger, and the degradation effect was significantly improved with the increase in enrichment [6]. The results showed that BCCP could improve the degradation efficiency of NH4+–N as the carrier of immobilized AOB. Due to the porous structure of the biochar sphere that provides a larger surface area and more pores, it can store more substrates and promote the growth of microorganisms [21].

3.2.2. The Effect of Immobilized Aquamicrobium sp. on the Removal of PHCs

Figure 3B shows the removal efficiency of PHCs under different conditions. From the figure, it can be observed that the PHC degradation in the control group with the addition of BCCP exhibited a gradual increase from 32.45% on the 3rd d to 43.14% on the 15th d, which indicated the process was only adsorption efficiency. However, upon the addition of bacterial strains, the removal efficiency of PHCs significantly improved. FB, P-B and P-B-SA + PVA demonstrated removal efficiencies of 96.48%, 93.69% and 96.53% for PHCs at the 15th d, respectively. Notably, P-B-SA + PVA showed superior removal performance compared to PB, primarily due to its porous structure, which enhances PHC adsorption while providing a larger substrate reservoir to promote microbial growth [22].

3.3. Performance of Immobilized Compound Bacteria

Individual immobilization of Aquamicrobium sp. and Flavobacterium mizutaii sp. showed better degradation effects for NH4+–N and PHCs. However, whether the composite embedding of the two bacterial communities still has the same effect for NH4+–N and PHCs removal needs to be studied and is demonstrated in Figure 4. At the 1st d, the degradation effects of NH4+–N and PHCs by the two bacteria were unsatisfactory at only 28.74% and 32.5%, respectively. With the time extending, the adaptability of the flora to the environment was enhanced, and the abundance of microorganisms was enriched [23], resulting in increased degradation of NH4+–N and PHCs. At the 10th d, the degradation efficiency reached 74.62% and 82.48%, respectively. Compared with the individual immobilized Aquamicrobium sp. and Flavobacterium mizutaii sp. (the removal efficiencies of NH4+–N and PHCs were 84.69% and 96.53%), the removal efficiencies of NH4+–N and PHCs with the immobilized compound bacteria were slightly reduced (individual immobilized bacteria was 10.07% and 14.05% higher than those by the composite embedding).

3.4. Tolerance of Immobilized Compound Bacteria to Low Temperature and High Salinity

3.4.1. Tolerance to Temperature

Temperature is an important environmental factor that affects microbial growth. Figure 5A demonstrates the effect of temperature on the degradation of NH4+–N and PHCs by immobilized Flavobacterium mizutaii sp. and Aquamicrobium sp. As the temperature gradually increased, the degradation efficiency of NH4+–N and PHCs also increased. At 10 °C, the removal efficiencies of NH4+–N and PHCs were 52.5% and 41.25%, respectively. However, as the temperature rose to 35 °C, the removal efficiencies of NH4+–N and PHCs increased to 92.76% and 89.92%, respectively. When the temperature was lower than the optimal growth temperature for Flavobacterium mizutaii sp. and Aquamicrobium sp., the intracellular activity within the microbial cells decreased, which led to a slower growth rate of bacteria [24]. The previous study by Huang et al. (2017) confirmed that the Aquamicrobium sp. was a cold-tolerant AOB and could degrade 53.48% NH4+–N when the temperature was 15 °C [13]. The high removal efficiency reflected by SA and PVA immobilization with BCCP is owed to cold-resistant function. Meanwhile, Huang et al. (2022) utilized SA and PVA immobilized petroleum degrading bacteria and found it to have certain salt- and cold-resistance performances [14].

3.4.2. Tolerance to Salinity

Salinity is another important environmental factor that affects microbial growth. As shown in Figure 5B, the optimal salinity for the degradation of NH4+–N and PHCs is 15‰ with removal efficiencies of 88.27% and 91.64%, respectively. However, as salinity increases, the removal efficiencies of PHCs and NH4+–N continuously decrease. At a salinity of 35‰, the removal efficiencies of NH4+–N and PHCs decrease to 58.74% and 47.68%, respectively. This is mainly due to the impact of high salt environments on cell osmotic pressure, leading to a decrease in microbial abundance [25]. Gao et al., 2020 found that immobilization materials provide protection to bacteria in high-salinity environments [25]. When salinity exceeds 15%, bacterial growth is inhibited, which is consistent with the findings of this study. The previous study by Huang et al., 2017 found that the Aquamicrobium sp. was a salt-tolerant AOB, and the NH4+–N removal efficiency could reach 60% when the salinity was 20‰ [13]. In this study, the removal efficiencies were 58.74% and 47.68% under the conditions of 35‰ and 20‰, which indicated the SA and PVA immobilization with BCCP can protect bacteria and slow down the impact of high salinity.

3.5. NH4+–N and PHCs Degradation Mechanism with BCCP Immobilization

Based on the above research, a preliminary discussion of the mechanisms underlying the degradation of NH4+–N by immobilized Flavobacterium mizutaii sp. and the degradation of PHCs by Aquamicrobium sp. has been conducted and is illustrated in Figure 6. The BCCP exhibits physical adsorption, which facilitates the rapid adsorption and accumulation of NH4+–N and PHCs, providing better conditions for subsequent microbial degradation. Additionally, the encapsulation of bacterial populations within the biochar spheres allows for the degradation of high concentrations of NH4+–N. The porous nature of biochar provides a habitat for the bacterial community, and its adsorption capacity promotes microbial transformation, leading to the degradation of NH4+–N and PHCs [26]. In summary, the BCCP contribute to the effective removal of NH4+–N and PHCs through physical adsorption, while the encapsulation of bacterial populations within the biochar spheres and the porous nature of biochar provide favorable conditions for bacterial degradation and transformation processes, ultimately leading to the degradation of NH4+–N and PHCs.

4. Conclusions

The results showed that the optimal composition of BCCP was 15% biochar, 3% Na2SiO3 and 3% NaHCO3. The primary and secondary factors influencing the adsorption capacity were NaHCO3 dosage > biochar dosage > Na2SiO3 dosage. The adsorption process of BCCP for NH4+–N fitted the pseudo-second-order kinetic equation. Individual immobilization of AOB (Flavobacterium mizutaii sp.) and petroleum-degrading bacteria (Aquamicrobium sp.) owned higher removal efficiencies (84.69% and 96.53%) than free bacteria. Compared with the individual immobilized Aquamicrobium sp. and Flavobacterium mizutaii sp., the removal efficiencies of NH4+–N and PHCs with immobilizing compound bacteria were reduced by 10.07% and 14.05%. In addition, immobilization relieved the effects of low temperature and high salinity.

Author Contributions

P.S.: Data curation, Visualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft. J.W.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing—review and editing. Y.G.: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing—review and editing. Z.Z.: Writing—review and editing. X.H.: Funding acquisition, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U20A20103), the Special Project of Guangxi Science and Technology Base and Talent (No. GUIKE AD20297065), the Scientific Research Fund of the Fourth Institute of Oceanography (No. 202003), the Science and Technology Planning Projects of Beihai, Guang xi, China (No. 202082042 and 202082031) and the National Major Project of Water Pollution Control and Management Technology in China (No. 2013ZX07202-007).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author H. X. upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Saha, T.K.; Pal, S. Exploring physical wetland vulnerability of Atreyee river basin in India and Bangladesh using logistic regression and fuzzy logic approaches. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 98, 251–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Duan, M.; Li, C.; Wang, X.; Fang, S.; Xiong, Y.; Shi, P. Solid separation from the heavy oil sludge produced from Liaohe Oilfield. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2018, 172, 1112–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Huang, X.; Bai, J.; Li, K.; Zhao, Y.; Tian, W.; Hu, C. Preparation of Clay/Biochar Composite Adsorption Particle and Performance for Ammonia Nitrogen Removal from Aqueous Solution. J. Ocean Univ. China 2020, 19, 729–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Cheng, T.; Fu, K.; Qin, Z.; Feng, K. Biofilm Structural and Functional Features on Microplastic Surfaces in Greenhouse Agricultural Soil. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shahi, A.; Aydin, S.; Ince, B.; Ince, O. Evaluation of microbial population and functional genes during the bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil as an effective monitoring approach. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 125, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sun, P.; Huang, X.; Xing, Y.; Dong, W.; Yu, J.; Bai, J.; Duan, W. Immobilization of Ochrobactrum sp. on Biochar/Clay Composite Particle: Optimization of Preparation and Performance for Nitrogen Removal. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 838836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. He, H.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Cheng, Y.; Yang, C.; Zeng, G. Influence of salinity on microorganisms in activated sludge processes: A review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 2016, 119, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nwoba, E.G.; Parlevliet, D.A.; Laird, D.W.; Alameh, K.; Moheimani, N.R. Light management technologies for increasing algal photobioreactor efficiency. Algal Res. 2019, 39, 101433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Angelim, A.L.; Costa, S.P.; Farias, B.C.S.; Aquino, L.F.; Melo, V.M.M. An innovative bioremediation strategy using a bacterial consortium entrapped in chitosan beads. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 127, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reddy, S.; Osborne, J.W. Biodegradation and biosorption of Reactive Red 120 dye by immobilized Pseudomonas guariconensis: Kinetic and toxicity study. Water Environ. Res. 2020, 92, 1230–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yan, H.; Han, Z.; Zhao, H.; Pan, J.; Zhao, Y.; Tucker, M.E.; Zhou, J.; Yan, X.; Yang, H.; Fan, D. The bio-precipitation of calcium and magnesium ions by free and immobilized Lysinibacillus fusiformis DB1-3 in the wastewater. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 252, 119826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, X.; Bai, J.; Li, K.-R.; Zhao, Y.-G.; Tian, W.-J.; Dang, J.-J. Characteristics of two novel cold- and salt-tolerant ammonia-oxidizing bacteria from Liaohe Estuarine Wetland. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 114, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huang, X.; Zhou, T.; Chen, X.; Bai, J.; Zhao, Y. Enhanced Biodegradation of High-Salinity and Low-Temperature Crude-Oil Wastewater by Immobilized Crude-Oil Biodegrading Microbiota. J. Ocean Univ. China 2022, 21, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mahdi, Z.; Yu, Q.J.; El Hanandeh, A. Removal of lead(II) from aqueous solution using date seed-derived biochar: Batch and column studies. Appl. Water Sci. 2018, 8, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ojeda-López, R.; Ramos-Sánchez, G.; García-Mendoza, C.; Azevedo, D.C.S.; Guzmán-Vargas, A.; Felipe, C. Effect of Calcination Temperature and Chemical Composition of PAN-Derived Carbon Microfibers on N2, CO2, and CH4 Adsorption. Materials 2021, 14, 3914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Xue, S.; Zhang, X.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.; Wen, H.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, C. Food waste based biochars for ammonia nitrogen removal from aqueous solutions. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 292, 121927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yao, Y.; Gao, B.; Fang, J.; Zhang, M.; Chen, H.; Zhou, Y.; Creamer, A.E.; Sun, Y.; Yang, L. Characterization and environmental applications of clay–biochar composites. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 242, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ömeroğlu, A.; Erdoğan, Y.; Özcan, A.S. Modification of bentonite with a cationic surfactant: An adsorption study of textile dye Reactive Blue 19. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 140, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, F.; Wang, J.; Li, W.; Li, E.; Falandysz, J. Removal of cadmium and lead from heavy metals loaded PVA–SA immobilized Lentinus edodes. Desalination Water Treat. 2013, 52, 4792–4801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Y.; Yu, B.; Lin, J.; Naidu, R.; Chen, Z. Simultaneous adsorption and biodegradation (SAB) of diesel oil using immobilized Acinetobacter venetianus on porous material. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 289, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, Y.-G.; Zheng, Y.; Tian, W.; Bai, J.; Feng, G.; Guo, L.; Gao, M. Enrichment and immobilization of sulfide removal microbiota applied for environmental biological remediation of aquaculture area. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 214, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Nie, H.; Nie, M.; Diwu, Z.; Wang, L.; Yan, H.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, B.; Wang, Y. Biological treatment of high salinity and low pH produced water in oilfield with immobilized cells of P. aeruginosa NY3 in a pilot-scale. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 381, 121232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Binnal, P.; Babu, P.N. Optimization of environmental factors affecting tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater by Chlorella protothecoides in a lab scale photobioreactor. J. Water Process. Eng. 2017, 17, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ge, C.-H.; Dong, Y.; Li, H.; Li, Q.; Ni, S.-Q.; Gao, B.; Xu, S.; Qiao, Z.; Ding, S. Nitritation-anammox process–A realizable and satisfactory way to remove nitrogen from high saline wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 275, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gao, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Lee, C.T.; Ong, P.Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, C. Effect of aquaculture salinity on nitrification and microbial community in moving bed bioreactors with immobilized microbial granules. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 297, 122427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, L.; Wang, T.L.; Li, H.F.; Chen, J.Q.; Su, F.L. Effects of the Liao RiverWetland on removal nitrogen. J. Irrig. Drain. 2012, 31, 137–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The preparation process of BCCP.
Figure 1. The preparation process of BCCP.
Water 15 02959 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of strain SY-I based on the complete sequences of the 16SrDNA gene.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of strain SY-I based on the complete sequences of the 16SrDNA gene.
Water 15 02959 g002
Figure 3. Effect of BCCP-immobilized AOB (A) and petroleum-degrading bacteria (B).
Figure 3. Effect of BCCP-immobilized AOB (A) and petroleum-degrading bacteria (B).
Water 15 02959 g003
Figure 4. Removal performance of immobilized compound bacteria on NH4+–N and PHCs.
Figure 4. Removal performance of immobilized compound bacteria on NH4+–N and PHCs.
Water 15 02959 g004
Figure 5. Effects of temperature (A) and salinity (B) on immobilized compound bacteria.
Figure 5. Effects of temperature (A) and salinity (B) on immobilized compound bacteria.
Water 15 02959 g005
Figure 6. NH4+–N and PHCs removal mechanism by immobilization of compound bacteria on BCCP.
Figure 6. NH4+–N and PHCs removal mechanism by immobilization of compound bacteria on BCCP.
Water 15 02959 g006
Table 1. The orthogonal test table level of BCCP preparation factors.
Table 1. The orthogonal test table level of BCCP preparation factors.
Number.Biochar Dosage (%)Na2SiO3 Dosage (%)NaHCO3 Dosage (%)
1511
2522
3533
41012
51023
61031
71513
81521
91532
Table 2. Physiological and biochemical responses of HXN-2 and SY-1.
Table 2. Physiological and biochemical responses of HXN-2 and SY-1.
No. of StrainsCatalase TestStarch Hydrolysis TestCitrate TestMR TestGlucose Oxidation Fermentation TestVP TestIndole Test
HXN-2++++
SY-I+++
Table 3. Orthogonal experiment results with different preparation formulas.
Table 3. Orthogonal experiment results with different preparation formulas.
LevelsBiochar Dosage (%)Na2SiO3 Dosage (%)NaHCO3 Dosage (%)Result
ABCAdsorption Capacity (mg/g)
15110.452
25220.463
35330.484
410120.487
510230.495
610310.491
715130.538
815210.521
915320.526
Average value 10.4660.4920.4880.506
Average value 20.4910.4930.492
Average value 30.5280.5000.506
Table 4. The range analysis of NH4+–N adsorption with different biochar preparation formulas.
Table 4. The range analysis of NH4+–N adsorption with different biochar preparation formulas.
LevelsFactor
δ1δ2δ3RT
1δ11 = −0.029δ21 = −0.003δ31 = −0.007R01 = −0.0030.026
R11 = −0.029
2δ12 = −0.004δ22 = −0.002δ32 = −0.003R02 = −0.0020.002
R12 = −0.004
3δ13 = 0.033δ23 = 0.005δ33 = 0.011R03 = 0.0330.028
R13 = 0.005
Primary relationCAB
Optimal schemeA3B3C3 (15% – 3% – 3%)
Table 5. The adsorption kinetic parameters of BCCP with different biochar dosing quantities.
Table 5. The adsorption kinetic parameters of BCCP with different biochar dosing quantities.
B i o c h a r C l a y Pseudo-First-OrderPseudo-Second-OrderIntra-Particle Diffusion
qeK−1qeqR2K2qeqR2kpR2
(mg/g)(min−1)(mg/g)(g/mg min)(mg/g)(g/mg min0.5)
5%0.4500.0360.4550.9290.0930.5130.9860.0240.944
10%0.4820.0360.4690.9390.0880.5300.9910.0250.944
15%0.5180.0390.4950.9160.0920.5570.9830.0260.945
Table 6. The adsorption kinetic parameters of BCCP with different NaHCO3 dosing quantities.
Table 6. The adsorption kinetic parameters of BCCP with different NaHCO3 dosing quantities.
N a 2 C O 3 C l a y Pseudo-First-OrderPseudo-Second-OrderIntra-Particle Diffusion
qeK−1qeqR2K2qeqR2kpR2
(mg/g)(min−1)(mg/g)(g/mg min)(mg/g)(g/mg min0.5)
1.0%0.3950.0350.3700.8770.1170.4140.9590.0190.960
2.0%0.4040.0290.3850.8990.0910.4350.9530.0210.961
3.0%0.4110.0390.3940.9340.1210.4400.9850.0200.928
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, P.; Wei, J.; Gao, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Huang, X. Biochar/Clay Composite Particle Immobilized Compound Bacteria: Preparation, Collaborative Degradation Performance and Environmental Tolerance. Water 2023, 15, 2959. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15162959

AMA Style

Sun P, Wei J, Gao Y, Zhu Z, Huang X. Biochar/Clay Composite Particle Immobilized Compound Bacteria: Preparation, Collaborative Degradation Performance and Environmental Tolerance. Water. 2023; 15(16):2959. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15162959

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Pengfei, Jun Wei, Yaoyao Gao, Zuhao Zhu, and Xiao Huang. 2023. "Biochar/Clay Composite Particle Immobilized Compound Bacteria: Preparation, Collaborative Degradation Performance and Environmental Tolerance" Water 15, no. 16: 2959. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15162959

APA Style

Sun, P., Wei, J., Gao, Y., Zhu, Z., & Huang, X. (2023). Biochar/Clay Composite Particle Immobilized Compound Bacteria: Preparation, Collaborative Degradation Performance and Environmental Tolerance. Water, 15(16), 2959. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15162959

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop