Next Article in Journal
Future Joint Probability Characteristics of Extreme Precipitation in the Yellow River Basin
Next Article in Special Issue
The Social Fabric of Watershed Management: Comparison of Citizen-Based and Agency-Based Organizations
Previous Article in Journal
Impact Assessment of Livestock Production on Water Scarcity in a Watershed in Southern Brazil
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Water
Volume 15
Issue 22
10.3390/w15223956
water-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Freshwater Salinization Syndrome Alters Nitrogen Transport in Urban Watersheds

by
Joseph G. Galella
1,
Sujay S. Kaushal
1,*,
Paul M. Mayer
2,
Carly M. Maas
1,
Ruth R. Shatkay
1,
Shreeram Inamdar
3 and
Kenneth T. Belt
4
1
Department of Geology & Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20140, USA
2
US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Corvallis, OR 97333, USA
3
Water Science and Policy Graduate Program, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
4
Department of Geography and Environmental Systems, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2023, 15(22), 3956; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15223956
Submission received: 3 October 2023 / Revised: 3 November 2023 / Accepted: 9 November 2023 / Published: 14 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue A Variety of Paths—New Ways to Look at the Urban Watershed Continuum)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Anthropogenic salt inputs have impacted many streams in the U.S. for over a century. Urban stream salinity is often chronically elevated and punctuated by episodic salinization events, which can last hours to days after snowstorms and the application of road salt. Here, we investigated the impacts of freshwater salinization on total dissolved nitrogen (TDN) and NO3−/NO2− concentrations and fluxes across time in urban watersheds in the Baltimore-Washington D.C. metropolitan area of the Chesapeake Bay region. Episodic salinization from road salt applications and snowmelt quickly mobilized TDN in streams likely through soil ion exchange, hydrologic flushing, and other biogeochemical processes. Previous experimental work from other studies has shown that salinization can mobilize nitrogen from sediments, but less work has investigated this phenomenon with high-frequency sensors and targeted monitoring during road salt events. We found that urban streams exhibited elevated concentrations and fluxes of TDN, NO3−/NO2−, and specific conductance that rapidly peaked during and after winter road salt events, and then rapidly declined afterwards. We observed plateaus in TDN concentrations in the ranges of the highest specific conductance values (between 1000 and 2000 μS/cm) caused by road salt events. Plateaus in TDN concentrations beyond a certain threshold of specific conductance values suggested source limitation of TDN in watersheds (at the highest ranges in chloride concentrations and ranges); salts were likely extracting nitrogen from soils and streams through ion exchange in soils and sediments, ion pairing in soils and waters, and sodium dispersion of soils to a certain threshold level. When watershed transport was compared across land use, including a forested reference watershed, there was a positive relationship between Cl− loads and NO3−/NO2− loads. This relationship occurred across all sites regardless of land use, which suggests that the mass transport of Cl− and NO3−/NO2− are likely influenced by similar factors such as soil ion exchange, ion pairing, sodium dispersion of soils, hydrologic flushing, and biogeochemical processes. Freshwater salinization has the potential to alter the magnitude and timing of total dissolved nitrogen delivery to receiving waters during winter months following road salt applications, and further work should investigate the seasonal relationships of N transport with salinization in urban watersheds.

1. Introduction

Freshwater salinization syndrome (FSS) has been observed throughout North America and Europe over the past century [1,2,3]. FSS refers to the suite of biophysical impacts triggered by increased salt ions in the environment. In temperate areas, anthropogenic salt inputs are thought to be the primary driver of FSS, with chronically elevated salinity punctuated by acute episodic salinization events caused by road salt application [4]. For example, U.S. sales of road salt have increased 147-fold from 149,000 metric tons in 1940 to nearly 22 million metric tons in the winter of 2017–2018 [5,6]. This rising trend may be due to impervious surface cover increasing across the United States largely due to increased suburbanization [7]. In addition, larger and more severe winter storms triggered by ongoing anthropogenic climate change may alter salinization trends [6]. FSS can cause alterations in contaminant mobility, biodiversity, and the quality of drinking water in urban watersheds [4,8,9,10,11]. Road salting mobilizes nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), organic matter, and other ions (Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, Cu, Mn, Sr2+) [2,3,4,9,12,13]. Less work has investigated the mobilization of N during and after road salt events. In this study, we use a combination of routine monitoring, winter storm event data, and high-frequency sensor data collected before, during, and after winter road salt events to understand temporal trends in N mobilization in urban watersheds.
Anthropogenically enhanced N loads can lead to eutrophication in urban waterways and coastal receiving waters [14,15,16]. N is often a limiting nutrient and can trigger the growth of phytoplankton and harmful algal blooms [14,17]. Consequently, much research has been devoted to understanding N transport from watersheds to streams [9,18,19]. Increases in N flux and concentration can increase during snowmelt events due to the flushing of N accumulated in soils over the dormant periods (from atmospheric deposition and/or soil nitrification) [18,20,21,22]. In addition, there can be natural seasonal pulses in N concentrations in streams that do not occur during winter. For example, N increases seasonally during summer in some streams in Maryland, and N is lowest and undetectable during the winter [23]; similar seasonal patterns with summer pulses are observed in some areas of North Carolina and Tennessee [24,25]. In urban watersheds, there can also be interactions between land use and hydrologic events to amplify N transport [15,26]. Recent work from laboratory experiments has shown that road salt applications in urban watersheds can mobilize N from soils [9,12]. Saltier soil conditions may also influence ammonium leaching in riparian groundwater at a site near a major roadway, but this was not monitored at the event scale or explicitly linked to road salt events [18].
The role of salinization impacts on watershed N transport and transformation has received relatively little attention (e.g., [9,12,27]). N concentrations in urban streams can be elevated by sewage leaks, atmospheric deposition, and fertilizers [28]. Our current understanding suggests that the ability of urban watersheds to retain and transform N may be diminished by: decreased hydrologic connectivity between streams and “hot spots” of N retention in urban riparian zones [29,30], increased hydrologic flashiness and decreased hydrologic residence times [31], headwater stream burial and channelization of streams [32,33,34], and decreased biological uptake of N following storms and scouring of biofilms [2]. Overall, there may be an increased supply of N in urban streams that exceeds biological demand [35]. Understanding the potential role of FSS in influencing and disrupting the N cycle is essential for accurately accounting for controls on N exports in urbanized watersheds [36,37,38].
Freshwater salinization enhances N transport from soils to streams via ion exchange, changes in the solubility of organic N, and changes in biogeochemical processes [12,13,38]. Ion exchange causes Na+ as well as other base cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, and K+) to desorb positively charged NH4+ from sediments and negatively charged colloids [39,40,41,42]. Salt ions are very efficient at mobilizing ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3−) from soil samples [43,44]. Other salt ions can also mobilize elements via cation exchange (e.g., ammonium), anion exchange (e.g., nitrate), and solubility changes (e.g., dissolved organic N) [9,45]. NaCl, a common deicer, can also act to mobilize ammonium through cation exchange and sodium dispersion [46,47,48,49]. The positive charge of ammonium allows it to be sorbed onto negatively charged colloid particles in soils and sediments [50]. Influxes of base cations (Na+, Ca2+, and Mg2+) can then displace ammonium through base cation exchange, mobilizing ammonium into the water column [47,49]. Salt pollution can also influence the movement and extraction of other ions (such as nitrate) from soils and waters through ion pairing or temporary bonding by electrostatic forces. In addition, salt ions can influence the solubility of organic N [48], with some studies indicating that increased salinity can mobilize dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) from soil and plant matter [51]. There can also be “salting in” effects, which alter the organic matter’s quality and solubility [3,38]. During “salting in”, the solubility of organic matter is increased as ionic strength elevates [38].
Elevated salinity is detrimental to flora, both aquatic and terrestrial, causing injury through ion toxicity, osmotic stress, and nutrient deficiency via cation leaching by Na+ [40]. Salt-induced N mobilization may alter the balance of plant–microbe competition for nutrients, thus changing aquatic N removal rates [40]. Winter road salt pulses, which quickly increase stream water salinity, can also alter microbial processes, which affect the N cycle. High osmotic stress and ion-specific toxicity caused by elevated salinity can lead to cell lysis and the release of formerly stored inorganic and organic N and labile organic matter [38,40]. Hydrologic systems that have been chronically exposed to FSS may evolve microbial communities distinct from those in more natural watersheds [52]. These microbial communities are often adapted to elevated salinities [27,40,52].
TDN mobilization during the winter may also be enhanced by N buildup in soils and subsequent flushing during precipitation. This process, often observed in urban and forested catchments, occurs when upper soil layers are enriched with N during the low biological demand winter months [19,22,53,54] and flushed during periods of snowmelt or when the water table rises to saturate the N-laden horizon [54,55,56]. Markedly different patterns are observed in alternate climates or in areas of high agricultural land use [19,54].
Despite a variety of mobilization mechanisms in the environment, N concentrations and fluxes are often variable in their response to road salt applications in laboratory experiments [9,12]. In prior incubation studies, increased salinity showed a positive relationship with TDN concentration in some study sites, while other sites did not show a clear trend [9,12]. A possible explanation for this variability may be that the sediment present in some of the sites may have had a lower N content due to leaching from repeated previous exposure to elevated salinity levels [9,27]. In the environment, freshwater salinization may mobilize available N from watersheds and soils until there is source limitation or a plateau in concentrations at the highest levels of salinity [9,13]. Here, we investigate the potential for temporal patterns in the concentrations and mass fluxes of N to be exacerbated by FSS at the watershed scale. We hypothesize that episodic winter salt pollution has the potential to mobilize N from urban watersheds and further increase N concentrations and fluxes.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Sites

Our study sites consisted of five urban streams within the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Rock Creek and Sligo Creek are found within the D.C. metropolitan area, while Scotts Level Branch, Herring Run, and Jones Falls are contained within the Baltimore metropolitan area (Table 1; Figure 1). We chose these sites because of access to high-frequency continuous sensor data, which measured specific conductance and discharge from USGS stations. Sites were also proximal to the University of Maryland College Park, where further analysis was conducted. Urban and suburban land use is most prevalent at all sampling sites, with impervious surface cover varying between 18–33% along the five streams. Riparian buffers are present at all sites but are most pronounced (wider and more contiguous) at Rock Creek and least pronounced at Jones Falls, where they become absent within the city of Baltimore where the channel is buried. Jones Falls is also notable as the only tidally influenced site. StreamStats, a USGS-based web application, was used to delineate watersheds, while the National Land Cover Database provided 30 m resolution land use and impervious surface cover data [57,58]. Watershed characteristics were visualized with ArcMap 10.8.2, ESRI 2022 ArcGIS Desktop, Redlands, CA, USA.

2.2. Field Measurements

Routine Monitoring and High-Frequency Monitoring

Routine stream water grab samples were collected at bi-weekly intervals (every other week) beginning in October 2017 and ending between 2019 and 2021 (Table 1). Samples were collected directly into 125 mL HDPE Nalgene acid-washed sample bottles [4]. For targeted winter storm event sampling, hourly samples were collected using an automated sampler (ISCO 3700) at Sligo Creek [59]. The automated sampler was used to collect samples before, during, and slightly after snowstorm events. Every hour, 300 mL of water was collected and remained on ice (internal reservoir) until the storm subsided and it was safe to retrieve the unit(s) [4,13]. Once collected, samples were kept chilled on ice in the field or in a lab fridge kept at 4 ± 2 °C until analysis within 14 days [4,13]. If samples were not analyzed within 14 days, they were frozen to preserve them for future analysis.
All sampling sites were located at USGS gauge stations equipped with high-frequency sensor measurements of discharge and SC (5–15 min) [60]. USGS monitoring stations utilize multiparameter datasondes, which take instantaneous measurements. Rock Creek (USGS Gauge Station 1648010), Sligo Creek (USGS Gauge Station 1650800), Scotts Level Branch (USGS Gauge Station 1589290), Herring Run (USGS Gauge Station 1585219), and Jones Falls (USGS Gauge Station 1589485) were all monitored continuously for discharge (Q) and specific conductance (SC). Rock Creek was also continuously monitored by sensors for NO3−/NO2− [60] through February 2019, after which the NO3−/NO2− sensor was discontinued. Continuous SC, Q, and NO3−/NO2− data from Accotink Creek near Annandale, VA (USGS Gauge Station 1654000), 23 km from Rock Creek, was used to supplement the NO3−/NO2− dataset after measurements ceased at Rock Creek [60]. SC was reported in microsiemens per centimeter (µS/cm) at 25 °C. SC contact sensors were temperature adjusted (to report at 25 °C) and accurate > 0.5 ± 0.5% of readings, or ±2 µS/cm [61,62]. Temperature data was collected using a thermistor with an accuracy of ±0.1 °C. Q was measured to an accuracy of the nearest 0.01 ft or 0.2% stage height [62,63]. Instantaneous measurements of NO3−/NO2− were collected via a multiparameter datasonde [60]. Information regarding the instrumental error, calibrations, and accuracy of USGS multiparameter datasondes are further described in [61,62].

2.3. Laboratory

2.3.1. Water Quality Analyses

Once transported to the laboratory, water samples were immediately filtered through an ashed Whatman 0.7-micron glass fiber filter into labeled acid-washed HDPE Nalgene bottles [4,13]. Total dissolved nitrogen (TDN) was analyzed on a Shimadzu total organic carbon analyzer (Shimadzu TOC-L CPH/CPN) total nitrogen module, TNM-1 using a chemiluminescence method [4,13,64]. Calibration of the TOC-L was performed every run (max 80 samples) with a 5-point calibration curve. Blanks were run and checked for accuracy (<0.5) every 15 samples [4,13]. Calibration (internal) standards as well as external check standards were used in instrument calibration to determine if results were within the acceptable range of ±20% of the true value [4,13].

2.3.2. Numerical Analysis and Plotting

MATLAB 2021b was used to generate hysteresis plots. Hysteresis plots are used to assess how the concentration and flux of nutrients evolve over a precipitation event. SC in microsiemens per centimeter at 25 °C was plotted on the x axis. High-frequency storm data collected at Sligo Creek plotted TDN on the y axis in milligrams per liter. Data collected at Accotink Creek at the USGS monitoring site plotted NO3−/NO2− on the Y axis. Data from Rock Creek was not used in this analysis due to NO3−/NO2− sensor cessation in 2019. Four winter precipitation events from 2019 to 2021 were used for hysteresis analysis and a color scale was added to the data points in order to show the temporal nature of the data. Blue data points were taken near the beginning of the precipitation event and yellow data points were collected at the end. Hysteresis loops moving in a clockwise direction indicated that N or NO3−/NO2− concentrations decreased with increasing SC over the course of the storm. Counterclockwise hysteresis indicated that N or NO3−/NO2− concentrations increased with increasing SC over the course of the storm.
TDN and NO3−/NO2− mass fluxes in kg/h were calculated using the following formula:
(TDN or NO3−/NO2− concentration in mg/L) × (Q in CFS) × 28.3168 × 60 × 60/1,000,000
where 28.3168 is liters per cubic foot, 60 is seconds per minute, 60 is minutes per hour, and 1,000,000 is milligrams per kilogram.

3. Results

3.1. Seasonal Trends in Routine Sampling Sites and USGS Data

In situ sensor and bi-weekly grab sampling data revealed the existence of distinct seasonal water quality patterns in streams draining all five watersheds in the Baltimore and Washington D.C. metro areas. Sensor data from the USGS showed that winter road salting could regularly increase SC by more than an order of magnitude over the course of several hours (Table 2, Figure 2). Peaks in TDN concentrations and fluxes were also elevated during winter months, coinciding with the peaks in SC (Figure 2). All non-tidal routine sampling sites (Sligo Creek, Rock Creek, Herring Run, and Scotts Level Branch) had coinciding peaks in specific conductance and TDN concentrations or fluxes over time (Figure 2). Jones Falls did not have coinciding peaks in SC and TDN concentrations; this is probably because the site is tidal, which results in highly variable SC readings throughout the year. There were elevated TDN mass fluxes at Rock Creek during 2018, which are likely a result of sewage leaks frequently reported in the area, requiring a fecal bacteria TMDL to be created for the catchment [65].
USGS data from Rock Creek and Accotink Creek also showed similar coinciding pulses in SC and NO3−/NO2− (Figure 3). Seasonal trends were most apparent when comparing mass fluxes of NO3−/NO2− with SC at Accotink Creek (Figure 3). Peak SC values were always associated with peak mass fluxes of NO3−/NO2− every winter from 2015 to 2021. Elevated hourly mass fluxes of TDN and NO3−/NO2− coincided with peaks in SC, which suggested that N concentrations were not significantly diluted by increasing discharge (Figure 2 and Figure 3).

3.2. Targeted Storm Event Sampling of Winter Precipitation (Sligo Creek)

Analysis of high-frequency sampling conducted during winter precipitation events illustrated two different patterns in watershed TDN and NO3−/NO2− transport. When a winter storm was dominated by solid precipitation (snow/sleet) and road salt concentrations consistently increased, concentrations of TDN and NO3−/NO2− decreased with increasing SC. For example, during a snowstorm starting on 31 January 2021 at Sligo Creek, TDN concentration dropped from 2.35 mg/L at the start of the storm to 1.128 mg/L at the end (Figure 4). However, hourly mass fluxes consistently increased with increased SC throughout the snowstorm event from 0.82 kg/h TDN when the storm started to 2.33 kg/h TDN as the winter storm ceased. Peak SC reached as high as 12,400 μS/cm by the end of the snowstorm event. These observations are consistent across multiple different snowstorms and at both Sligo Creek and Accotink Creek (Figure 4).
Interestingly, winter storms which began as snow and then shifted to rain (rain-on-snow events), have different patterns. During a rain-on-snow event captured with targeted storm sampling at Sligo Creek (Figure 5), SC quickly peaked (within 3 h) at 5000 μS/cm and then sharply decreased, as rain diluted the discharge to 890 μS/cm within three hours. As the rain transitioned back to snow, the SC rose again to 5000 μS/cm. During this rain-on-snow event, TDN concentrations rose with increased SC from 0.49 mg/L to 1.29 mg/L, but hourly TDN fluxes decreased from 11.1 kg/h to 2.1 as SC rose.

3.3. Hysteresis of Nitrogen Concentrations during Winter Snow Events

Hysteresis analyses of rain-on-snow vs. snow events suggested distinct patterns of TDN mobilization. Figure 6 shows hysteresis loops from two rain-on-snow events (indicated with the raindrop symbol) and two snow events (indicated with the snowflake symbol). Counterclockwise hysteresis was observed for both rain-on-snow events at Sligo Creek (2019 and 2020), which indicated that TDN concentrations increased with increasing SC values over time. Clockwise hysteresis was observed for both snow events recorded at Sligo Creek (2021), which indicated that TDN concentrations decreased with increasing SC values over time. As expected, the results were consistent with those at nearby Accotink Creek, where USGS sensors also measured high-frequency NO3−/NO2− concentrations. Counterclockwise hysteresis was observed during both rain-on-snow events and clockwise hysteresis was observed during both snowstorms. The 2020 rain-on-snow event at Accotink Creek was unique, as it had both a clockwise and counterclockwise loop present.

3.4. Plateaus in N Concentrations over Time during Road Salt Events

Data from routine and targeted snow event monitoring at Sligo Creek (Figure 7) showed a positive relationship between SC and TDN. The increasing trend between SC and TDN was present until ~2000 μS/cm, where a plateau was reached. Pearson correlation was 0.242 for routine monitoring data (p 0.04) and 0.08 for high-frequency data (p 0.33), illustrating the plateau effect above ~2000 μS/cm. A similar pattern was also observed using USGS data from Rock Creek and Accotink Creek, where a positive correlation between SC and NO3−/NO2− concentrations was observed until a plateau at ~1000 μS/cm (Figure 8). Pearson correlation was 0.643 at Rock Creek (p < 0.0001) for specific conductance <1000 μS/cm and −0.38 (p < 0.0001) for specific conductance > 1000 μS/cm. Pearson correlation was 0.32 at Accotink Creek (p < 0.0001) for specific conductance < 1000 μS/cm and 0.131 (p < 0.0001) for specific conductance > 1000 μS/cm. Seasonal trends are shown for Rock Creek and Accotink Creek via box-and-whisker plots. Points above the upper quartile marked in red show elevated SC values present during the winter months of December through March. Elevated NO3−/NO2− is also present during the same timeframe of December through March at both Rock Creek and Accotink Creek (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

Our results suggest that FSS can alter the concentrations and fluxes of N transported from urban watersheds. Many studies have evaluated other causes of elevated N transport from watersheds related to atmospheric deposition, land use, management, and other factors [14,23,30,40]. Our work also suggests that relationships between TDN or NO3−/NO2− concentrations and specific conductance can reveal unique insights into N cycling and transport in urban environments. When targeted winter storm event data and high-frequency sensor data during winter storms are analyzed (along with routine monitoring data throughout the year), a distinct pattern emerges; there are plateaus in N concentrations at relatively high specific conductance. Up to a certain threshold, the effects of FSS in certain urban catchments can act to elevate both TDN and NO3−/NO2− concentrations, as well as hourly mass fluxes. This is observable as seasonal pulses (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 8) during and after winter storm events (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Complex biogeochemical interactions can drive the mobilization, transport, and retention of N. However, there were clear patterns in winter pulses of N concentrations and fluxes in this study, which suggest the importance of water quality monitoring in response to road salt events during winter months should be reconsidered.

4.1. FSS and Mobilization of TDN and NO3−/NO2− Pulses

At routine sampling sites, TDN and NO3−/NO2− concentrations and hourly mass fluxes increased throughout the winter, especially coinciding with winter precipitation events and associated peaks in SC (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Statistically significant linear relationships between SC and TDN were most apparent at Sligo Creek, where targeted winter storm event sampling was conducted. Similar trends were observed at Rock Creek and Accotink Creek where high-frequency data was also available. This highlights the importance of integrating storm event or high-frequency temporal sampling in monitoring programs ([4]), although this data is often difficult to collect. Average hourly mass fluxes of 0.8 kg/h TDN were observed at Sligo Creek during routine sampling and peaked at 2.5 kg/h. Targeted winter storm event sampling at Sligo Creek during the 2019 snow event captured hourly TDN mass fluxes reaching a maximum of 17.6 kg/h (within a one hour of peak SC (2050 μS/cm). Positive SC and TDN relationships were also observed at Rock Creek, Scotts Level Branch, and Herring Run. Data from USGS continuous monitoring sensors at Rock Creek and Accotink Creek showed seasonal patterns in NO3−/NO2− mobilization, with peaks in NO3−/NO2− concentrations and hourly mass fluxes, which coincided with peaks in specific conductance (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Many previous studies have characterized seasonal patterns in N concentrations in streams. For example, studies from different regions throughout the U.S. have shown that NO3− and TDN peak during winter months, when biological activity is lowest [66,67]. However, there are exceptions where stream N concentrations can peak during summer months in some watersheds in warmer regions due to increasing organic matter decomposition, N mineralization, and nitrification [25,68]. In the Chesapeake Bay watershed, Testa et al. 2018, proposes that there are seasonal cycles to N loads throughout the year. During spring and early summer, there are high NO3−, NH4+, and particulate N inputs, leading to a bloom of phytoplankton during the spring and oxygen depletion and NH4+ accumulation in the summer [16]. During late summer and autumn, phytoplankton production is reduced and vertical mixing of water columns resumes, replenishing dissolved oxygen and increasing nitrification. This process may explain some of the seasonal cycling observed in this study (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 8) but peaks associated with road salting events and positive correlations between specific conductance and NO3−/NO2− mobilization show that FSS can play a role in N cycling and transport.
Our results are consistent with previous laboratory studies that show that salinization can alter N concentrations in soils, streams, and wetlands [9,12,27,48]. Lab-based incubation analysis on samples collected from the D.C. and Baltimore metro areas showed increasing mobilization of TDN with increasing salinity at 75% of the sites sampled [9]. Suburban and urban sites located in the Gwynns Falls watershed showed positive linear relationships with increasing salinization (Figure S1) [9].
Impervious surface cover and urban land use have also been linked to total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) mobilization under FSS conditions. TKN increased in concentration as salinity increased at all sites studied (forested, agricultural, suburban, and urban), with the greatest degree of mobilization recorded at urban sites [12]. The same trend occurred when mobilization was graphed over watershed percent impervious surface cover (% ISC) instead of using land use classifications. Significant positive relationships were discovered between % ISC and TKN concentration [12].
Mobilization of N and NO3−/NO2− is thought to be driven chemically by a combination of ion exchange [43,44], ion pairing, and sodium dispersion [46,47,48,49]. Cation exchange has also been shown to mobilize NH4+ from soils and sediments into solution [40]. Biological factors like cell lysis due to rapidly changing osmotic stress and ion-specific toxicity may also contribute to additional N loading during acute road salting events [38,40]. The rates of microbial processes which control N transformation may also be affected by elevated salinities associated with FSS, increasing leaching of NO3− from impacted waterways [48]. However, some microbial communities in watersheds may become adapted to elevated salinities, lessening the cell lysis associated with high osmotic stress [27]. More work is necessary to investigate the effects of increased salinization on microbial N cycling.

4.2. Concurrent N Build and Flush in Temperate Watersheds

Some degree of the increased TDN and NO3−/NO2− fluxes recorded during winter snow events may be caused by the buildup and flushing of N in the upper layers of soil present at the research sites. Urban and forested watersheds in temperate climates are known to accumulate N during the winter months when microbes and flora are least active [19,22,53,54]. However, the results suggest that this seasonal mobilization with precipitation is enhanced by mobilization via interactions with deicers. Across varied land use at Urban (Rock Creek), Rural (Connecticut River), and Agricultural (Maumee River) sites, there were significant (p < 0.05) positive relationships between chloride (Cl−) mass flux and NO3− mass flux, indicating that build and flush is not the only mechanism driving nutrient mobilization.

4.3. High Temporal Frequency Sampling and Storm Hysteresis

Different types of winter precipitation can affect TDN and NO3−/NO2− mobility in urban catchments. High-frequency sampling at Sligo Creek and Accotink Creek showed that during solid precipitation events, TDN and NO3−/NO2− concentrations decreased (clockwise hysteresis) while mass flux increased over time (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The opposite trends were found during rain-on-snow events, where N and NO3−/NO2− concentrations increased (counterclockwise hysteresis) while mass flux decreased over time.
During rain-on-snow events, at the point of transition from snow to rain, hourly mass fluxes of TDN and NO3−/NO2− were significantly higher than at any other point during the storm. These peaks were captured by both high-frequency monitoring by sensors and targeted storm sampling. Initial N mobilization by elevated SC, followed by elevated discharge, caused mass fluxes to briefly reach 47 kg/h NO3−/NO2− at Accotink Creek (Figure 5). Similar conditions have been recorded in rural forested catchments in Ontario, Canada. During individual rain-on-snow events, as much as 40% of the annual NO3− export from the catchment could be mobilized [69]. These significant NO3− pulses were often followed by depressed pH and alkalinity [69].
After the transition from snow to rain, decreasing specific conductance associated with rainfall may limit the mobilization of TDN into the water column via hydrologic dilution, diminished base cation exchange, or decreased osmotic stress on microbial cell membranes [9,40,70]. We speculate that increased N mass flux with increased SC during snow events may be a result of freshwater and saltwater mixing in the hyporheic zone and the mobilization of N from transient storage zones. When a high density gradient is present (saline water mixing with freshwater), the mixing efficiency and reaction area increase, which can elevate NO3− production from the lysis of microbial cells, ammonification and nitrification, and subsequent transport. [71]. However, further research is necessary to determine why N fluxes and concentrations increase due to hydrological, physical, and biological mechanisms.

4.4. Plateaus in N Concentrations over Time during Road Salt Events

When plotted against SC, TDN and NO3−/NO2− concentrations have a positive relationship until they reach a plateau. This plateau was found to be at ~1000 μS/cm for NO3−/NO2− concentrations (Figure 8) and closer to 2000 μS/cm for N concentrations (Figure 7). Thresholds in N species mobilization by FSS are thought to be caused by the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the sediments present at these catchments (Sligo Creek, Rock Creek, and Accotink Creek). Similar CEC limits were found when examining major and trace element mobilization at urban stormwater best management practices [13]. Plateaus in N mobilization were also discovered in salinization incubation experiments in Haq et al., 2018. Once a cation like Na+ has mobilized positively charged species like NH4+ from all exchange sites available on sediment colloids, the concentration can no longer increase [47,49]. Thresholds in N and NO3−/NO2− mobilization can also be influenced by biological mechanisms. Recent studies have suggested that over decades of exposure to FSS, microbial communities may become adapted to the high osmotic stress of episodic FSS due to road salting, leading to reduced cell lysis and N dispersion at high salinities [27,40]. These biological factors may also play a role in determining the limits of the plateaus observed.

4.5. Nitrate and Chloride Fluxes across Land Use

Similar to the relationships discussed so far between TDN or NO3−/NO2− and SC, there also exists a significant relationship between NO3− and Cl− fluxes. As shown in Figure 9, datasets collected across varied land use, show that there is a strong relationship between NO3− and Cl− even at Pond Branch, a forested reference site for the Baltimore Ecosystem Study (BES) [72]. Fluxes generally increased as land use shifted from rural, to exurban (Baisman Run), with even higher fluxes being recorded at urban catchments (Sligo Creek, Rock Creek, and Accotink Creek). The highest fluxes measured were at the Maumee River, an agricultural catchment in Ohio, where both deicer and fertilizer are used in abundance.
Exurban sites like Baisman Run are especially fascinating as concentrations and fluxes of NO3− and Cl− increased from 1998–2018 despite snowfall and road salt use not significantly changing during the period of recording [73]. Concentrations and fluxes were an order of magnitude higher at Baisman Run than in the neighboring Pond Branch, further reinforcing the impact that anthropogenic change has on the biogeochemical mechanisms of affected watersheds [73]. The trends shown in Figure 9 further reinforce that the patterns observed are not only caused by the seasonal build and flush of NO3− observed in temperate climates, but also impacts and interactions of other anthropogenic activities [72].
NO3− and Cl− concentrations also illustrate co-mobility in Figure 10. Changes in concentration are not nearly as linear as those observed in Figure 9 with differences in site typology being more pronounced. Maumee River, an agricultural site, had by far the greatest NO3− concentrations recorded (up to 7 mg/L) and urban Sligo Creek (with a heavily salted roadway paralleling most of its length) recorded the greatest chloride concentration at nearly 3000 mg/L [72].

5. Conclusions

Many monitoring programs mainly study baseflow and targeted rainstorms during fall, summer, and spring, meaning that many important N transport events can be missed during winter snowstorms and episodic road salting. Most of the literature regarding N mobilization focuses on mobilization during rain events but research during the winter months is scarce [74,75]. More work needs to be done in order to capture more detailed snow event data and thus better understand winter N fluxes and cycling in urban watersheds [20,21]. Increased fluxes of N to sensitive, and potentially eutrophic, receiving waters during times of colder temperatures and lower biological uptake could influence downstream transport distances [16]. Increased salinization could also negatively impact the function of any stream restorations present in the affected catchments, as nutrient retention is usually a stated goal of their construction [38,76].
Increased winter monitoring is necessary to better elucidate how road salt inputs may alter the timing and magnitude of TDN mobilization in soils and streams. As there is limited literature on the subject, more data on seasonal trends as well as spatial dynamics of mobilization is needed. High-resolution spatial and temporal data is especially important, as certain trends in mobilization are only exposed by very-high-frequency sampling (≤1 h resolution) (Figure 7). Monitoring for ammonium (NH4+) could also be valuable for future studies as previous research shows that NH4+ is mobilized by Na+ in groundwater [18] and that Na+ can alter NH4+- cycling as well as mobility in surface waters and soils [48]. Debris dams and other sources of organic matter may act as a sink for NO3−, but microbial communities residing in them may take time to adapt to the highly saline environments and the associated osmotic stress present in urban streams [27]. In the long term, searching for alternatives to NaCl road salt could help alleviate the situation, but it is unclear if CaCl2 or MgCl2 are less harmful [13]. The use of brines may be a useful management strategy for the interim as they are already dilute and introduce less salt per unit area [13]. Where available, the use of groundwater shows promise as a possible deicing alternative but its usage appears to be mainly limited to areas of Japan at this time [77]. Managing road salt may also need to be considered in other management strategies for nutrients, metals, and other contaminants due to the potential impacts of road salt on co-mobilization of mixtures of multiple chemicals from soils to streams (e.g., [2,3,4,9,12,13,36,38]). More experiments, field studies, and snow event monitoring are needed to better elucidate potential interactions between salt and the urban watershed N cycle in a wider geographic range. Data elucidating the proportional N loading from different drivers (fertilizers, legacy sediment, deicers, etc.) would be especially helpful in determining the allocation of remediation efforts.
Effective use of management strategies like brines or alternate deicers requires there to be not only improved monitoring but also ecologically relevant targets for salinity and nutrient loads. For the United States, the EPA suggests a criteria continuous concentration (an estimate of the highest concentration of a pollutant which organisms can be chronically exposed to) for chloride of 230 mg Cl−/L and a criteria maximum concentration (an estimate of the highest concentration of a pollutant which organisms can be acutely exposed to) of 860 mg Cl−/L [78]. These metrics would be good candidates for re-examination; however, these chloride thresholds are too high to prevent harm to zooplankton communities and in turn damage to the entire food web [78]. The issue of freshwater salinization may be a good candidate for using common pool resource management to generate viable strategies to integrate governance systems, actors, resource units, and resource systems to work towards the common goal of reducing FSS [79].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/w15223956/s1, Figure S1: Gwynns Falls Laboratory Incubations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.G.G., S.S.K. and P.M.M.; methodology, J.G.G. and S.S.K.; software, J.G.G. and C.M.M.; validation, J.G.G., S.S.K., P.M.M., C.M.M., R.R.S., S.I. and K.T.B.; formal analysis, J.G.G., C.M.M. and R.R.S.; investigation, J.G.G., C.M.M. and R.R.S.; resources, S.S.K. and P.M.M.; data curation, J.G.G.; writing—original draft preparation, J.G.G., S.S.K., P.M.M., C.M.M. and R.R.S.; writing—review and editing, J.G.G., S.S.K., P.M.M., C.M.M., R.R.S., S.I. and K.T.B.; visualization, J.G.G., C.M.M., S.S.K. and P.M.M.; supervision, S.S.K. and P.M.M.; project administration, S.S.K. and P.M.M.; funding acquisition, S.S.K. and P.M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Maryland Sea Grant SA75281870W, Chesapeake Bay Trust Restoration Research grant 16918, and its funding partners, Washington Metropolitan Council of Governments contract #21-001, National Science Foundation Growing Convergence Research 2021089, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency.

Data Availability Statement

Most continuous water quality data used in this paper are on publicly available data sites such as https://waterwatch.usgs.gov/.

Acknowledgments

The information in this document has been subjected to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (Agency) peer and administrative review, and it has been approved for publication as an Agency document. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the Agency. Any mention of trade names, products, or services does not imply an endorsement by the United States Government or the Agency. Special thanks to Lewis Linker (EPA) and Laura Sammon (MATLAB) for their substantial contributions and Julie Weitzman for her edits.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kaushal, S.S.; Groffman, P.M.; Likens, G.E.; Belt, K.T.; Stack, W.P.; Kelly, V.R.; Band, L.E.; Fisher, G.T. Increased Salinization of Fresh Water in the Northeastern United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 13517–13520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kaushal, S.S.; Gold, A.J.; Bernal, S.; Johnson, T.A.N.; Addy, K.; Burgin, A.; Burns, D.A.; Coble, A.A.; Hood, E.; Lu, Y.; et al. Watershed ‘Chemical Cocktails’: Forming Novel Elemental Combinations in Anthropocene Fresh Waters. Biogeochemistry 2018, 141, 281–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kaushal, S.S.; Likens, G.E.; Pace, M.L.; Haq, S.; Wood, K.L.; Galella, J.G.; Morel, C.; Doody, T.R.; Wessel, B.; Kortelainen, P.; et al. Novel ‘chemical Cocktails’ in Inland Waters Are a Consequence of the Freshwater Salinization Syndrome. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2019, 374, 20180017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Galella, J.G.; Kaushal, S.S.; Wood, K.L.; Reimer, J.E.; Mayer, P.M. Sensors Track Mobilization of ‘chemical Cocktails’ in Streams Impacted by Road Salts in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 035017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jackson, R.; Jobbágy, E. From Icy Roads to Salty Streams. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 14487–14488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pecher, W.T.; Madadha, M.E.A.; DasSarma, P.; Ekulona, F.; Schott, E.J.; Crowe, K.; Gut, B.S.; DasSarma, S. Effects of Road Salt on Microbial Communities: Halophiles as Biomarkers of Road Salt Pollution. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0221355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vogler, J.B.; Vukomanovic, J. Trends in United States Human Footprint Revealed by New Spatial Metrics of Urbanization and Per Capita Land Change. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Corsi, S.R.; Graczyk, D.J.; Geis, S.W.; Booth, N.L.; Richards, K.D. A Fresh Look at Road Salt: Aquatic Toxicity and Water-Quality Impacts on Local, Regional, and National Scales. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 7376–7382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Haq, S.; Kaushal, S.S.; Duan, S. Episodic Salinization and Freshwater Salinization Syndrome Mobilize Base Cations, Carbon, and Nutrients to Streams across Urban Regions. Biogeochemistry 2018, 141, 463–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hintz, W.D.; Fay, L.; Relyea, R.A. Road Salts, Human Safety, and the Rising Salinity of Our Fresh Waters. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2022, 20, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hintz, W.D.; Relyea, R.A. A Review of the Species, Community, and Ecosystem Impacts of Road Salt Salinisation in Fresh Waters. Freshw. Biol. 2019, 64, 1081–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Duan, S.; Kaushal, S.S. Salinization Alters Fluxes of Bioreactive Elements from Stream Ecosystems across Land Use. Biogeosciences 2015, 12, 7331–7347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Galella, J.G.; Kaushal, S.S.; Mayer, P.M.; Maas, C.M.; Shatkay, R.R.; Stutzke, R.A. Stormwater Best Management Practices: Experimental Evaluation of Chemical Cocktails Mobilized by Freshwater Salinization Syndrome. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023, 11, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Howarth, R.W.; Marino, R. Nitrogen as the Limiting Nutrient for Eutrophication in Coastal Marine Ecosystems: Evolving Views over Three Decades. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2006, 51, 364–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kaushal, S.S.; Groffman, P.M.; Band, L.E.; Shields, C.A.; Morgan, R.P.; Palmer, M.A.; Belt, K.T.; Swan, C.M.; Findlay, S.E.G.; Fisher, G.T. Interaction between Urbanization and Climate Variability Amplifies Watershed Nitrate Export in Maryland. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 5872–5878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Testa, J.M.; Kemp, W.M.; Boynton, W.R. Season-Specific Trends and Linkages of Nitrogen and Oxygen Cycles in Chesapeake Bay. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2018, 63, 2045–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wurtsbaugh, W.A.; Paerl, H.W.; Dodds, W.K. Nutrients, Eutrophication and Harmful Algal Blooms along the Freshwater to Marine Continuum. WIREs Water 2019, 6, e1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Inamdar, S.P.; Peck, E.K.; Peipoch, M.; Gold, A.J.; Sherman, M.; Hripto, J.; Groffman, P.M.; Trammell, T.L.E.; Merritts, D.J.; Addy, K.; et al. Saturated, Suffocated, and Salty: Human Legacies Produce Hot Spots of Nitrogen in Riparian Zones. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2022, 127, e2022JG007138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McHale, M.R.; McDonnell, J.J.; Mitchell, M.J.; Cirmo, C.P. A Field-Based Study of Soil Water and Groundwater Nitrate Release in an Adirondack Forested Watershed. Water Resour. Res. 2002, 38, 2-1–2-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Brooks, P.D.; Schmidt, S.K.; Williams, M.W. Winter Production of CO2 and N2O from Alpine Tundra: Environmental Controls and Relationship to Inter-System C and N Fluxes. Oecologia 1997, 110, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Brooks, P.D.; Williams, M.W.; Schmidt, S.K. Inorganic Nitrogen and Microbial Biomass Dynamics before and during Spring Snowmelt. Biogeochemistry 1998, 43, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Burns, D.A.; Murdoch, P.S.; Lawrence, G.B.; Michel, R.L. Effect of Groundwater Springs on NO3− Concentrations during Summer in Catskill Mountain Streams. Water Resour. Res. 1998, 34, 1987–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Groffman, P.M.; Law, N.L.; Belt, K.T.; Band, L.E.; Fisher, G.T. Nitrogen Fluxes and Retention in Urban Watershed Ecosystems. Ecosystems 2004, 7, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mulholland, P.J. The Importance of In-Stream Uptake for Regulating Stream Concentrations and Outputs of N and P from a Forested Watershed: Evidence from Long-Term Chemistry Records for Walker Branch Watershed. Biogeochemistry 2004, 70, 403–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Swank, W.T.; Vose, J.M. Long-Term Nitrogen Dynamics of Coweeta Forested Watersheds in the Southeastern United States of America. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 1997, 11, 657–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kaushal, S.S.; Mayer, P.M.; Vidon, P.G.; Smith, R.M.; Pennino, M.J.; Newcomer, T.A.; Duan, S.; Welty, C.; Belt, K.T. Land Use and Climate Variability Amplify Carbon, Nutrient, and Contaminant Pulses: A Review with Management Implications. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2014, 50, 585–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hale, R.L.; Groffman, P.M. Chloride Effects on Nitrogen Dynamics in Forested and Suburban Stream Debris Dams. J. Environ. Qual. 2006, 35, 2425–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaushal, S.S.; Groffman, P.M.; Band, L.E.; Elliott, E.M.; Shields, C.A.; Kendall, C. Tracking Nonpoint Source Nitrogen Pollution in Human-Impacted Watersheds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 8225–8232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Groffman, P.M.; Bain, D.J.; Band, L.E.; Belt, K.T.; Brush, G.S.; Grove, J.M.; Pouyat, R.V.; Yesilonis, I.C.; Zipperer, W.C. Down by the Riverside: Urban Riparian Ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2003, 1, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mayer, P.M.; Groffman, P.M.; Striz, E.A.; Kaushal, S.S. Nitrogen Dynamics at the Groundwater–Surface Water Interface of a Degraded Urban Stream. J. Environ. Qual. 2010, 39, 810–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pennino, M.J.; Kaushal, S.S.; Murthy, S.N.; Blomquist, J.D.; Cornwell, J.C.; Harris, L.A. Sources and Transformations of Anthropogenic Nitrogen along an Urban River–Estuarine Continuum. Biogeosciences 2016, 13, 6211–6228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Alberts, J.M.; Beaulieu, J.J.; Buffam, I. Watershed Land Use and Seasonal Variation Constrain the Influence of Riparian Canopy Cover on Stream Ecosystem Metabolism. Ecosystems 2017, 20, 553–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Elmore, A.J.; Kaushal, S.S. Disappearing Headwaters: Patterns of Stream Burial Due to Urbanization. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 6, 308–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pennino, M.J.; Kaushal, S.S.; Beaulieu, J.J.; Mayer, P.M.; Arango, C.P. Effects of Urban Stream Burial on Nitrogen Uptake and Ecosystem Metabolism: Implications for Watershed Nitrogen and Carbon Fluxes. Biogeochemistry 2014, 121, 247–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wollheim, W.M.; Bernal, S.; Burns, D.A.; Czuba, J.A.; Driscoll, C.T.; Hansen, A.T.; Hensley, R.T.; Hosen, J.D.; Inamdar, S.; Kaushal, S.S.; et al. River Network Saturation Concept: Factors Influencing the Balance of Biogeochemical Supply and Demand of River Networks. Biogeochemistry 2018, 141, 503–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kaushal, S.; Wood, K.L.; Galella, J.G.; Reimer, J.; Haq, S.; Gion, A.M.; Haviland, K.; Morel, C.; Wessel, B.; Nguyen, W.D.; et al. Making ‘Chemical Cocktails’ in Streams across the Periodic Table of Elements. Appl. Geochem. 2020, 2020, H092-08. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kaushal, S.S.; Likens, G.E.; Pace, M.L.; Reimer, J.E.; Maas, C.M.; Galella, J.G.; Utz, R.M.; Duan, S.; Kryger, J.R.; Yaculak, A.M.; et al. Freshwater Salinization Syndrome: From Emerging Global Problem to Managing Risks. Biogeochemistry 2021, 154, 255–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kaushal, S.S.; Reimer, J.E.; Mayer, P.M.; Shatkay, R.R.; Maas, C.M.; Nguyen, W.D.; Boger, W.L.; Yaculak, A.M.; Doody, T.R.; Pennino, M.J.; et al. Freshwater Salinization Syndrome Alters Retention and Release of Chemical Cocktails along Flowpaths: From Stormwater Management to Urban Streams. Freshw. Sci. 2022, 41, 420–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ardón, M.; Morse, J.L.; Colman, B.P.; Bernhardt, E.S. Drought-Induced Saltwater Incursion Leads to Increased Wetland Nitrogen Export. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 2976–2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kinsman-Costello, L.; Bean, E.; Goeckner, A.; Matthews, J.W.; O’Driscoll, M.; Palta, M.M.; Peralta, A.L.; Reisinger, A.J.; Reyes, G.J.; Smyth, A.R.; et al. Mud in the City: Effects of Freshwater Salinization on Inland Urban Wetland Nitrogen and Phosphorus Availability and Export. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 2022, 8, 112–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rysgaard, S.; Thastum, P.; Dalsgaard, T.; Christensen, P.B.; Sloth, N.P. Effects of Salinity on NH4+ Adsorption Capacity, Nitrification, and Denitrification in Danish Estuarine Sediments. Estuaries 1999, 22, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Seitzinger, S.P.; Gardner, W.S.; Spratt, A.K. The Effect of Salinity on Ammonium Sorption in Aquatic Sediments: Implications for Benthic Nutrient Recycling. Estuaries 1991, 14, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kachurina, O.; Zhang, H.; Raun, W.; Krenzer, E. Simultaneous Determination of Soil Aluminum, Ammonium- and Nitrate-nitrogen Using 1 M Potassium Chloride Extraction. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2000, 31, 893–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shuman, L.M.; Duncan, R.R. Soil Exchangeable Cations and Aluminum Measured by Ammonium Chloride, Potassium Chloride, and Ammonium Acetate. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1990, 21, 1217–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Herbert, E.R.; Boon, P.; Burgin, A.J.; Neubauer, S.C.; Franklin, R.B.; Ardón, M.; Hopfensperger, K.N.; Lamers, L.P.M.; Gell, P. A Global Perspective on Wetland Salinization: Ecological Consequences of a Growing Threat to Freshwater Wetlands. Ecosphere 2015, 6, art206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Compton, J.E.; Church, M.R. Salt Additions Alter Short-Term Nitrogen and Carbon Mobilization in a Coastal Oregon Andisol. J. Environ. Qual. 2011, 40, 1601–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Duckworth, C.M.S.; Cresser, M.S. Factors Influencing Nitrogen Retention in Forest Soils. Environ. Pollut. 1991, 72, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Green, S.M.; Machin, R.; Cresser, M.S. Effect of Long-Term Changes in Soil Chemistry Induced by Road Salt Applications on N-Transformations in Roadside Soils. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 152, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kim, S.; Koretsky, C. Influence of NaCl and CaCl2 on Lake Sediment Biogeochemistry. Appl. Geochem. 2011, 26, S198–S201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nieder, R.; Benbi, D.K.; Scherer, H.W. Fixation and Defixation of Ammonium in Soils: A Review. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2011, 47, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Steele, M.K.; Aitkenhead-Peterson, J.A. Salt Impacts on Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Leaching from Senesced Vegetation. Biogeochemistry 2013, 112, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lancaster, N.A.; Bushey, J.T.; Tobias, C.R.; Song, B.; Vadas, T.M. Impact of Chloride on Denitrification Potential in Roadside Wetlands. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 212, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Inamdar, S.P.; Christopher, S.F.; Mitchell, M.J. Export Mechanisms for Dissolved Organic Carbon and Nitrate during Summer Storm Events in a Glaciated Forested Catchment in New York, USA. Hydrol. Process. 2004, 18, 2651–2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Poor, C.J.; McDonnell, J.J. The Effects of Land Use on Stream Nitrate Dynamics. J. Hydrol. 2007, 332, 54–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Creed, I.F.; Band, L.E.; Foster, N.W.; Morrison, I.K.; Nicolson, J.A.; Semkin, R.S.; Jeffries, D.S. Regulation of Nitrate-N Release from Temperate Forests: A Test of the N Flushing Hypothesis. Water Resour. Res. 1996, 32, 3337–3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Creed, I.F.; Band, L.E. Export of Nitrogen from Catchments within a Temperate Forest: Evidence for a Unifying Mechanism Regulated by Variable Source Area Dynamics. Water Resour. Res. 1998, 34, 3105–3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. StreamStats. Available online: https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/ (accessed on 13 October 2022).
  58. MRLC. Available online: https://www.mrlc.gov/ (accessed on 13 October 2022).
  59. ISCO 3700. Available online: https://store.teledyneisco.com/pages/3700 (accessed on 28 March 2023).
  60. USGS NWIS USGS Water Data for the Nation. Available online: https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis (accessed on 13 October 2022).
  61. Gibs, J.; Wilde, F.D.; Heckathorn, H.A. Multiparameter Instruments; Version 1.1; Use of Multiparameter 6.8; USGS: Reston, VA, USA, 2012; 48p.
  62. Wagner, R.J.; Boulge, R.W., Jr.; Oblinger, C.J.; Smith, B.A. Guidelines and Standard Procedures for Continuous Water-Quality Monitors: Station Operation, Record Computation, and Data Reporting; Techniques and Methods; USGS: Reston, VA, USA, 2006; Volume 1-D3.
  63. USGS. Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/special-topics/water-science-school/science/how-streamflow-measured?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects (accessed on 27 November 2022).
  64. TOC-L Series. Available online: https://www.ssi.shimadzu.com/products/total-organic-carbon-analysis/toc-analysis/toc-l-series/index.html (accessed on 28 March 2023).
  65. Capacasa, J.M. Rock Creek TMDL 2007. United States Environmental Protection Agency Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029. Available online: https://mde.maryland.gov/programs/Water/TMDL/DocLib_RockCreek_02140206/RockCreek_FC_DR.pdf (accessed on 8 November 2023).
  66. Johnson, H.M.; Stets, E.G. Nitrate in Streams During Winter Low-Flow Conditions as an Indicator of Legacy Nitrate. Water Resour. Res. 2020, 56, e2019WR026996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kaushal, S.S.; Lewis, W.M. Fate and Transport of Organic Nitrogen in Minimally Disturbed Montane Streams of Colorado, USA. Biogeochemistry 2005, 74, 303–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Brookshire, J.E.N.; Gerber, S.; Webster, J.R.; Vose, J.M.; Swank, W.T. Direct Effects of Temperature on Forest Nitrogen Cycling Revealed through Analysis of Long-Term Watershed Records. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2011, 17, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Eimers, M.C.; Buttle, J.M.; Watmough, S.A. The Contribution of Rain-on-Snow Events to Annual NO3-N Export from a Forested Catchment in South-Central Ontario, Canada. Appl. Geochem. 2007, 22, 1105–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vaughan, M.C.H.; Bowden, W.B.; Shanley, J.B.; Vermilyea, A.; Sleeper, R.; Gold, A.J.; Pradhanang, S.M.; Inamdar, S.P.; Levia, D.F.; Andres, A.S.; et al. High-Frequency Dissolved Organic Carbon and Nitrate Measurements Reveal Differences in Storm Hysteresis and Loading in Relation to Land Cover and Seasonality. Water Resour. Res. 2017, 53, 5345–5363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jiang, Q.; Jin, G.; Tang, H.; Xu, J.; Chen, Y. N2O Production and Consumption Processes in a Salinity-Impacted Hyporheic Zone. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2021, 126, e2021JG006512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Groffman, P.M.; Rosi, E.; Martel, L.D. Baltimore Ecosystem Study: Stream Chemistry for Core Sites in Gwynns Falls 2020. Available online: https://portal.edirepository.org/nis/mapbrowse?packageid=knb-lter-bes.700.601 (accessed on 8 November 2023).
  73. Castiblanco, E.S.; Groffman, P.M.; Duncan, J.; Band, L.E.; Doheny, E.; Fisher, G.T.; Rosi, E.; Suchy, A.K. Long-Term Trends in Nitrate and Chloride in Streams in an Exurban Watershed. Urban Ecosyst. 2023, 26, 831–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kelly, P.T.; Renwick, W.H.; Knoll, L.; Vanni, M.J. Stream Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loads Are Differentially Affected by Storm Events and the Difference May Be Exacerbated by Conservation Tillage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 5613–5621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Mihiranga, H.K.M.; Jiang, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, W.; De Silva, K.; Kumwimba, M.N.; Bao, X.; Nissanka, S.P. Nitrogen/Phosphorus Behavior Traits and Implications during Storm Events in a Semi-Arid Mountainous Watershed. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 791, 148382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Cooper, C.A.; Mayer, P.M.; Faulkner, B.R. Effects of Road Salts on Groundwater and Surface Water Dynamics of Sodium and Chloride in an Urban Restored Stream. Biogeochemistry 2014, 121, 149–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Baumgärtel, S.; Rohn, J.; Luo, J. Experimental Study of Road Deicing by Using the Urban Groundwater under the Climatic Condition of Nuremberg City, Germany. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kelly, M.G.; Free, G.; Kolada, A.; Phillips, G.; Warner, S.; Wolfram, G.; Poikane, S. Warding off Freshwater Salinization: Do Current Criteria Measure Up? Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water 2023, e1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Grant, S.B.; Rippy, M.A.; Birkland, T.A.; Schenk, T.; Rowles, K.; Misra, S.; Aminpour, P.; Kaushal, S.; Vikesland, P.; Berglund, E.; et al. Can Common Pool Resource Theory Catalyze Stakeholder-Driven Solutions to the Freshwater Salinization Syndrome? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 13517–13527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Water 15 03956 g001
Figure 1. Land use at Herring Run, Jones Falls, Scotts Level Branch, Rock Creek, Sligo Creek, and Gwynns Falls watersheds in the Baltimore, MD and Washington DC metro areas, United States of America.
Figure 1. Land use at Herring Run, Jones Falls, Scotts Level Branch, Rock Creek, Sligo Creek, and Gwynns Falls watersheds in the Baltimore, MD and Washington DC metro areas, United States of America.
Water 15 03956 g001
Water 15 03956 g002
Figure 2. Elevated TDN peaks were associated with peaks in specific conductance. Rock Creek, Sligo Creek, Herring Run, Scotts Level Branch, and Jones Falls were monitored by bi-weekly sampling. Targeted storm sampling data were also included at Sligo Creek. Concentration (mg/L) and flux kg/h were plotted. Negative values noted at Jones Falls are when flow is reversed due to tidal influence.
Figure 2. Elevated TDN peaks were associated with peaks in specific conductance. Rock Creek, Sligo Creek, Herring Run, Scotts Level Branch, and Jones Falls were monitored by bi-weekly sampling. Targeted storm sampling data were also included at Sligo Creek. Concentration (mg/L) and flux kg/h were plotted. Negative values noted at Jones Falls are when flow is reversed due to tidal influence.
Water 15 03956 g002
Water 15 03956 g003
Figure 3. Peaks in NO3−/NO2− concentrations associated with peaks in specific conductance. Concentrations of NO3−/NO2− (mg/L) were measured by high-frequency sensors at Rock Creek and Accotink Creek and hourly fluxes (kg/h) were calculated from discharge and concentration data.
Figure 3. Peaks in NO3−/NO2− concentrations associated with peaks in specific conductance. Concentrations of NO3−/NO2− (mg/L) were measured by high-frequency sensors at Rock Creek and Accotink Creek and hourly fluxes (kg/h) were calculated from discharge and concentration data.
Water 15 03956 g003
Water 15 03956 g004
Figure 4. Specific conductance, TDN, NO3−/NO2−, and discharge trends during two snowstorms at Sligo Creek and Accotink Creek. Over the course of the storm, concentrations of TDN and NO3−/NO2− were found to decrease while mass flux was found to increase. TDN data were collected by targeted storm sampling and NO3−/NO2− data were collected by high-frequency sensor measurements. Linear regression lines are plotted through all NO3−/NO2− vs. specific conductance plots to make the visualization of trends easier.
Figure 4. Specific conductance, TDN, NO3−/NO2−, and discharge trends during two snowstorms at Sligo Creek and Accotink Creek. Over the course of the storm, concentrations of TDN and NO3−/NO2− were found to decrease while mass flux was found to increase. TDN data were collected by targeted storm sampling and NO3−/NO2− data were collected by high-frequency sensor measurements. Linear regression lines are plotted through all NO3−/NO2− vs. specific conductance plots to make the visualization of trends easier.
Water 15 03956 g004
Water 15 03956 g005
Figure 5. Specific conductance, TDN, NO3−/NO2−, and discharge trends during two rain-on-snow storms at Sligo Creek and Accotink Creek. Over the course of the storm, concentrations of TDN and NO3−/NO2− were found to increase while mass fluxes were found to decrease. TDN data were collected by targeted storm sampling and NO3−/NO2− data were collected by high-frequency sensor measurements. Linear regression lines are plotted through all NO3−/NO2− vs. specific conductance plots to make the visualization of trends easier.
Figure 5. Specific conductance, TDN, NO3−/NO2−, and discharge trends during two rain-on-snow storms at Sligo Creek and Accotink Creek. Over the course of the storm, concentrations of TDN and NO3−/NO2− were found to increase while mass fluxes were found to decrease. TDN data were collected by targeted storm sampling and NO3−/NO2− data were collected by high-frequency sensor measurements. Linear regression lines are plotted through all NO3−/NO2− vs. specific conductance plots to make the visualization of trends easier.
Water 15 03956 g005
Water 15 03956 g006
Figure 6. Hysteresis loops for snow and rain-on-snow events at Sligo Creek and Accotink Creek. Sligo Creek data recorded TDN concentrations from targeted storm sampling measurements and Accotink data recorded NO3−/NO2− concentrations from high-frequency sensor measurements. Corresponding high-frequency sensor data for NO3−/NO2− from Rock Creek during the same time period were not available due to NO3−/NO2− sensor cessation at that location in 2019. Clockwise loops occurred during snow events and counterclockwise loops occurred during rain-on-snow events at both sites. Snowflake symbols denote a snow-only precipitation event, raindrop symbols denote a rain-on-snow event.
Figure 6. Hysteresis loops for snow and rain-on-snow events at Sligo Creek and Accotink Creek. Sligo Creek data recorded TDN concentrations from targeted storm sampling measurements and Accotink data recorded NO3−/NO2− concentrations from high-frequency sensor measurements. Corresponding high-frequency sensor data for NO3−/NO2− from Rock Creek during the same time period were not available due to NO3−/NO2− sensor cessation at that location in 2019. Clockwise loops occurred during snow events and counterclockwise loops occurred during rain-on-snow events at both sites. Snowflake symbols denote a snow-only precipitation event, raindrop symbols denote a rain-on-snow event.
Water 15 03956 g006
Water 15 03956 g007
Figure 7. Specific conductance at Sligo Creek. Regular bi-weekly sampling is plotted in blue circles and targeted winter storm event sampling is plotted in green diamonds. A plateau in mobilization is notable at ~2000 µS/cm where concentrations of TDN stop increasing with increases in specific conductance.
Figure 7. Specific conductance at Sligo Creek. Regular bi-weekly sampling is plotted in blue circles and targeted winter storm event sampling is plotted in green diamonds. A plateau in mobilization is notable at ~2000 µS/cm where concentrations of TDN stop increasing with increases in specific conductance.
Water 15 03956 g007
Water 15 03956 g008
Figure 8. Specific conductance is plotted against NO3−/NO2− concentration (mg/L) for Rock Creek and Accotink Creek from high-frequency sensor measurements. Data from Rock Creek and Accotink Creek both show distinctive plateaus in NO3−/NO2− mobilization at ~1000 µS/cm. Boxplots show monthly data for both sites where both NO3−/NO2− and specific conductance peak during the winter and reach a minimum in the autumn.
Figure 8. Specific conductance is plotted against NO3−/NO2− concentration (mg/L) for Rock Creek and Accotink Creek from high-frequency sensor measurements. Data from Rock Creek and Accotink Creek both show distinctive plateaus in NO3−/NO2− mobilization at ~1000 µS/cm. Boxplots show monthly data for both sites where both NO3−/NO2− and specific conductance peak during the winter and reach a minimum in the autumn.
Water 15 03956 g008
Water 15 03956 g009
Figure 9. NO3− and Cl− fluxes show co-mobilization. Flux data from Connecticut River, Sligo Creek, Rock Creek, Accotink Creek, and Maumee River are estimated from concentration and streamflow data from USGS gauge numbers 01161280, 01650800, 01648010, 01654000, and 04183500, respectively. Flux data from Pond Branch and Baisman Run are estimated from concentration data from the Baltimore Ecosystem Study [72] and streamflow data from USGS gauge numbers 01583570 and 01583580, respectively. Fluxes are lowest at rural sites, increasing through urban sites, and reaching a peak at agricultural sites. Anthropogenic fertilizers and road salt use are likely causing the change in flux over land use.
Figure 9. NO3− and Cl− fluxes show co-mobilization. Flux data from Connecticut River, Sligo Creek, Rock Creek, Accotink Creek, and Maumee River are estimated from concentration and streamflow data from USGS gauge numbers 01161280, 01650800, 01648010, 01654000, and 04183500, respectively. Flux data from Pond Branch and Baisman Run are estimated from concentration data from the Baltimore Ecosystem Study [72] and streamflow data from USGS gauge numbers 01583570 and 01583580, respectively. Fluxes are lowest at rural sites, increasing through urban sites, and reaching a peak at agricultural sites. Anthropogenic fertilizers and road salt use are likely causing the change in flux over land use.
Water 15 03956 g009
Water 15 03956 g010
Figure 10. NO3− and Cl− concentrations show co-mobilization until a plateau. Concentration data from Connecticut River, Sligo Creek, Rock Creek, Accotink Creek, and Maumee River are estimated from concentration and streamflow data from USGS gauge numbers 01161280, 01650800, 01648010, 01654000, and 04183500, respectively. Flux data from Pond Branch and Baisman Run are estimated from concentration data from the Baltimore Ecosystem Study [72] and streamflow data from USGS gauge numbers 01583570 and 01583580, respectively. Concentrations are lowest at rural sites, increasing through urban sites, and reaching a peak at agricultural sites.
Figure 10. NO3− and Cl− concentrations show co-mobilization until a plateau. Concentration data from Connecticut River, Sligo Creek, Rock Creek, Accotink Creek, and Maumee River are estimated from concentration and streamflow data from USGS gauge numbers 01161280, 01650800, 01648010, 01654000, and 04183500, respectively. Flux data from Pond Branch and Baisman Run are estimated from concentration data from the Baltimore Ecosystem Study [72] and streamflow data from USGS gauge numbers 01583570 and 01583580, respectively. Concentrations are lowest at rural sites, increasing through urban sites, and reaching a peak at agricultural sites.
Water 15 03956 g010
Table 1. USGS monitoring site characteristics are shown below. The state/metro area, latitude, longitude, USGS site number, and monitoring duration are all listed. Rock Creek, Sligo Creek, Scotts Level Branch, Herring Run, and Jones Falls were sampled bi-weekly. Accotink Creek data were obtained from a USGS gauge station. Tidally influenced sites are denoted with a *. All sites were located within the United States of America.
Table 1. USGS monitoring site characteristics are shown below. The state/metro area, latitude, longitude, USGS site number, and monitoring duration are all listed. Rock Creek, Sligo Creek, Scotts Level Branch, Herring Run, and Jones Falls were sampled bi-weekly. Accotink Creek data were obtained from a USGS gauge station. Tidally influenced sites are denoted with a *. All sites were located within the United States of America.
Study SiteState/Metro AreaLatitudeLongitudeUSGS Site NumberNLCD 2016 Impervious Surface Cover %Monitoring Duration
Rock CreekWashington DC38°57′36.6″77°02′31.4″164801018.3519 October 2017–23 June 2021
Sligo CreekWashington DC38°59′10.4″77°00′17.5″165080027.194 October 2017–23 June 2021
Scotts Level BranchBaltimore MD39°21′41.7″76°45′42.3″158929022.244 October 2017–15 April 2021
Herring RunBaltimore MD39°19′04.7″76°33′18.5″158521932.7626 October 2017–3 January 2019
Jones Falls *Baltimore MD39°17′02.8″76°36′13.1″158948521.281 November 2017–6 November 2019
Accotink CreekVA38°48′46”77°13′43”165400023.45 February 2015–1 Januray 2023
Table 2. Snow event sampling conducted with an ISCO automated water sampler. Samples were all collected at Sligo Creek, proximal to USGS station 1650800 in the Washington DC metro area. Δ in specific conductance denotes the minimum and maximum specific conductance values measured during the storm.
Table 2. Snow event sampling conducted with an ISCO automated water sampler. Samples were all collected at Sligo Creek, proximal to USGS station 1650800 in the Washington DC metro area. Δ in specific conductance denotes the minimum and maximum specific conductance values measured during the storm.
Snow EventSampling InitiatedSampling CeasedNΔ in Specific Conductance μS/cm
11 March 2019, 20:232 March 2019, 19:2324902–1730
216 Decmeber 2020, 10:0018 Decmeber 2020, 3:1033419–5130
325 January 2021, 17:3026 January 2021, 17:0048682–3850
431 January 2021, 6:002 February 2021, 5:00461330–12,500
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Galella, J.G.; Kaushal, S.S.; Mayer, P.M.; Maas, C.M.; Shatkay, R.R.; Inamdar, S.; Belt, K.T. Freshwater Salinization Syndrome Alters Nitrogen Transport in Urban Watersheds. Water 2023, 15, 3956. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15223956

AMA Style

Galella JG, Kaushal SS, Mayer PM, Maas CM, Shatkay RR, Inamdar S, Belt KT. Freshwater Salinization Syndrome Alters Nitrogen Transport in Urban Watersheds. Water. 2023; 15(22):3956. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15223956

Chicago/Turabian Style

Galella, Joseph G., Sujay S. Kaushal, Paul M. Mayer, Carly M. Maas, Ruth R. Shatkay, Shreeram Inamdar, and Kenneth T. Belt. 2023. "Freshwater Salinization Syndrome Alters Nitrogen Transport in Urban Watersheds" Water 15, no. 22: 3956. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15223956

APA Style

Galella, J. G., Kaushal, S. S., Mayer, P. M., Maas, C. M., Shatkay, R. R., Inamdar, S., & Belt, K. T. (2023). Freshwater Salinization Syndrome Alters Nitrogen Transport in Urban Watersheds. Water, 15(22), 3956. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15223956

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop