3.1. The Optimum λ and S of Decadal Models
Table 1,
Table 2 and
Table 3 display the BCa 99% confidence intervals of
λ for the M70, M80, and M90 decadal datasets. The BCa 99% confidence intervals of both the mean and median for each decadal dataset do not include the value of 0.2, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis (H
0) at the alpha = 0.01 level. Equation (2) was found to be statistically invalid and, thus, cannot be utilized to model runoff conditions in Peninsula Malaysia for the M70, M80, and M90 decadal datasets. The rejection of H
0 necessitates the search for a new, optimal value of
λ to develop a new rainfall-runoff prediction model.
The
λ dataset is skewed and tested to be non-normally distributed in SPSS for all three decadal groups and therefore, the search for an optimal representative
λ value using a supervised optimization technique will be concentrated on the range of median confidence intervals. These intervals are [0.049, 0.089] for the M70 dataset (
Table 1), [0.034, 0.064] for the M80 dataset (
Table 2), and [0.031, 0.063] for the M90 dataset (
Table 3).
The BCa 99% confidence intervals of
Sλ for the M70, M80, and M90 decadal datasets are presented in
Table 4,
Table 5 and
Table 6. The normality of the
Sλ dataset was tested using SPSS for all three decadal groups, and found to be normally distributed. Therefore, the optimal
Sλ value was searched for within the range of the mean confidence intervals. There intervals are [117.083, 187.008] for M70 dataset (
Table 4), [141.892, 231.088] for M80 dataset (
Table 5), and [131.989, 192.939] for M90 dataset (
Table 6).
The optimal
λ and
Sλ values for the M70, M80, and M90 decadal datasets using a supervised optimization technique are presented in
Table 7. The product of the optimal
λ and
Sλ values gives the representative initial abstraction value for each dataset, which can be calculated as
Ia =
λSλ.
3.2. The Decadal Rainfall-Runoff Models
The decadal rainfall-runoff models for Peninsula Malaysia are presented in
Table 8 by substituting the respective
Ia and
Sλ values from
Table 7 into Equation (1). Equations (3)–(5) were then formulated to model the decadal rainfall-runoff conditions in Peninsula Malaysia. To further analyse decadal runoff trend across multiple rainfall depths and CN
0.2 scenarios in Peninsula Malaysia, Equations (3)–(5) need to be re-expressed in terms of CN
0.2 to benefit SCS practitioners as they are more familiar with the use of curve number [
50].
To calculate
Sλ and
S0.2 for each decadal dataset, the general
Sλ formula (step 8 in methodology
Section 2.2) can be used with the optimum
λ values. Through SPSS, this study identified statistically significant power function correlation between
Sλ and
S0.2 for the M70, M80, and M90 decadal datasets, which is consistent with previous research findings [
66,
67,
68]. The final equations are listed in
Table 9.
Equations (6)–(8) played a crucial role in converting Sλ to S0.2, enabling SCS practitioners to use a rainfall-runoff model with CN0.2, which they are more familiar with. Furthermore, by establishing a correlation between the newly derived Sλ and S0.2, Equations (3)–(5) were modified to be expressed in CN0.2 terms, facilitating decadal trend analyses with CN0.2.
Equations (3)–(5) can be expressed in CN
0.2 by substituting
Sλ in Equation (1) with Equations (6)–(8), as well as the SCS-CN formula (Step 10 in methodology
Section 2.2). By doing so, the decadal runoff predictive models can be re-expressed as shown in
Appendix B. The resulting alternate representations for decadal runoff predictive models in Peninsula Malaysia are presented in
Table 10 in term of CN
0.2.
3.3. The Decadal Runoff Trend Analyses
The decadal runoff models (Equations (9)–(11)) enable the quantification of runoff conditions for various decades under different rainfall depths (P) and CN0.2 scenarios, facilitating the analysis of runoff changes. The DID HP 27 dataset contains the lowest and highest recorded rainfall depths, ranging from 20 mm to 430 mm across CN0.2 classes from 46 to 94. Runoff difference tables can then be calculated between any two decadal models.
This study evaluated the inter-decadal runoff differences between M70 and M80, M80 and M90, and M70 and M90 in Peninsula Malaysia. The runoff amount of the earlier decade was subtracted from the latter to determine the inter-decadal runoff difference. For instance, the inter-decadal runoff difference between M70 (Equation (9)) and M80 (Equation (10)) was calculated by subtracting the runoff amount of M70 from that of M80. A positive inter-decadal runoff difference amount indicated a larger runoff amount in M80 compared to M70 and vice versa. Statistical analyses were performed to determine significant runoff trends between different decades. This study also correlated decadal runoff changes with deforestation and urbanization data in Peninsula Malaysia.
Non-parametric Kendall’s Tau b and Spearman’s Rho statistics were used to evaluate the inter-decadal runoff trend in SPSS. Both statistics showed a significant positive correlation (2-tailed) at alpha = 0.01 for all inter-decadal periods, rainfall depths, and CN
0.2 classes mentioned above. This positive correlation indicates an upward trend in inter-decadal runoff, which can be visually represented in
Figure 1,
Figure 2 and
Figure 3. To assess the magnitude of this upward trend in each inter-decadal scenario and CN
0.2 class (ranging from 46 to 94) according to rainfall depths from 20 mm to 430 mm, Sen slopes and its collective inferential statistics were calculated. The Sen slopes and inferential statistics of all CN
0.2 classes were then analysed collectively for each inter-decadal scenario at the alpha = 0.01 level, and the results are tabulated in
Table 11,
Table 12 and
Table 13.
Calculated Sen slope values were tested as normally distributed in SPSS. Therefore, the mean Sen slope value was used to represent each inter-decadal runoff scenario. On average, the collective Sen slope value was 0.0121 (p = 0.01, 99% confidence interval from 0.00701 to 0.01720) to indicate the runoff incremental trend between M80 and M90. The Sen slope between M70 and M80 was 0.0051 (p = 0.01, 99% confidence interval from 0.00313 to 0.00713), while between M70 and M90 it was 0.0178 (p = 0.01, 99% confidence interval from 0.01049 to 0.02506). The Sen slope values also estimated the percentage of rainfall depth that becomes incremental runoff. For instance, the average expected runoff increment from a rainfall depth of 100 mm across CN0.2 classes from 46 to 94 can be estimated to be 1.21 mm between M80 and M90 (i.e., 0.0121 × 100 mm).
The study conducted a repetition of all statistical analyses with a CN
0.2 range of 46 to 70 to assess the runoff changes across lower CN
0.2 classes, which correspond to rural and forested catchments. This was done to obtain a more accurate estimate of the inter-decadal runoff increment conditions in these areas. The results showed that the runoff incremental trend between M80 and M90 of CN
0.2 (46 to 70) had a Sen slope value of 0.0190 (
p = 0.01, 99% confidence interval from 0.01595 to 0.02216). The Sen slope value between M70 and M80 was 0.0075 (
p = 0.01, 99% confidence interval from 0.00606 to 0.00898), and between M70 and M90, it was 0.0276 (
p = 0.01, 99% confidence interval from 0.02262 to 0.03239). For example, the expected runoff increment from rainfall of 100 mm across CN
0.2 classes from 46 to 70 was estimated to be 1.90 mm between M80 and M90. The study found that runoff increments were significant (
p = 0.01) between all inter-decadal scenarios and were more apparent in forested and rural areas (highlighted area in
Figure 4).
Positive inter-decadal runoff difference in Peninsula Malaysia is depicted in
Figure 1,
Figure 2 and
Figure 3. High rainfall depths and low CN
0.2 groups, which are associated with forested catchments, are particularly affected. These study outcomes are in line with previous studies [
67,
68,
69,
70]. Inter-decadal runoff differences are more pronounced under high rainfall depths. The mean runoff of different decades across different CN
0.2 classes was calculated and compiled, as shown in
Figure 5. M90 had the highest runoff, while M70 had the lowest. Greater percentage changes in mean runoff were observed in lower CN
0.2 classes (forested catchments) compared to higher CN
0.2 classes (urban area). The largest mean runoff incremental percentage was 12.6% (6.6 mm) from M70 to M90 at CN
0.2 = 46, while the smallest change was 0.1% (0.1 mm) from M80 to M90 at CN
0.2 = 94.
3.4. The Impact of CN0.2 Variation on Runoff
According to [
71], due to variation in hydrological conditions, CN
0.2 value is often calibrated to match observed runoff dataset in modelling practice. Researchers observed that a variation of ±10% in CN
0.2 might lead to ±50% runoff variation [
72] while [
73] it was reported that even 1% increase in CN
0.2 with rainfall depth of 175 mm had caused 2.03% increase in runoff. References [
73,
74] concluded that CN
0.2 variations will have a larger impact on runoff than other parameters in Equation (1).
CN
0.2 tweaking becomes a convenient way to calibrate and validate hydrological models. However, other studies reported that CN
0.2 value of a catchment was unstable and decreased when rainfall increased [
74,
75,
76]. The error and sensitivity analysis results by some researchers stated that CN
0.2 variations would induce a larger impact on runoff calculation with inherent error rather than rainfall depth variations [
72,
74,
77]. CN
0.2 tweaking might achieve or improve temporal hydrological modelling accuracy through the trial-and-error technique, but the practicality of the end result was often uncertain and lack of statistical justification.
This study modelled the impact of CN
0.2 variation with the DID HP 27 dataset. According to [
78], the practical CN values were likely to be within the range of 40 to 98. The optimum best collective CN
0.2 was 71 for the entire DID HP 27 dataset, thus, CN
0.2 variation up to 40% was chosen to cover the range of CN
0.2 from 43 to 99 and rainfall from 20 mm to 430 mm. CN
0.2 upscaling induced larger runoff change than downscaling while both effects were largely felt at rainfall depths below 100 mm. On average, runoff would reduce by 37% when CN
0.2 was downscaled up to 40% between 20 mm and 430 mm. On the other hand, the average runoff increased by 306% when CN
0.2 was upscaled up to 40%. The average runoff for both scenarios was almost identical when rainfall depths were limited to higher rainfall depths (100 mm to 430 mm). The average runoff reduced by 34% when CN
0.2 was downscaled up to 40%, while average runoff increased by 35% when CN
0.2 was upscaled to the same range. Varying the CN
0.2 value by ±10% resulted in an average runoff change of 40%, which is consistent with the findings reported in [
72]. Similarly, upscaling the CN
0.2 value by 1% with a rainfall depth of 175 mm caused a 2% increase in runoff, which matches the range reported by [
73]. Sen slope analyses showed that in both CN
0.2 upscaling and downscaling scenario, runoff reduction and incremental rates reduced toward the high rainfall depths but increased according to the CN
0.2 variation percentage. Lower rainfall depths (20 to 100 mm) had higher runoff variation percentages than higher rainfall depths (100 to 430 mm), as reported by previous studies [
67,
68,
69,
70].
Figure 6 and
Figure 7 present the overview of the impact of CN
0.2 variation on runoff with equations to estimate the percentage change in runoff.
3.5. The Impact of Deforestation and Urbanization on Runoff in Peninsula Malaysia
According to statistics from the Malaysia Department of Forestry, Peninsula Malaysia went through extensive deforestation from the 1970s. Forest area decreased at fast rates in the 1980s and started to stabilise in the 1990s. Forest area had reduced by 21.1% from M70 to M80 and 25.5% from M70 to M90 (
Figure 8).
Figure 9 was created to show the relationship between these decadal forest area reduction rate and its corresponding mean inter-decadal incremental runoff difference (Q
v%) across different CN
0.2 classes in Peninsula Malaysia. During the period between M70 and M90 in Peninsula Malaysia, the mean excess (incremental) runoff volume difference for CN
0.2 classes ranging from 46 to 70 was calculated to be 6.8 mm, equivalent to 6.8 million litres per square kilometre. This corresponds to a 10.2% increase in excess runoff, and it occurred simultaneously with a 25.5% decrease in forest area. These findings provide insights into the hydrological impacts of deforestation on non-homogeneous catchments. In general, inter-decadal mean runoff differences were more pronounced in forested and rural catchments (lower CN
0.2 classes) than urban areas. Inter-decadal runoff difference between M70 and M90 is significantly greater than runoff difference between M70 and M80 (
Figure 9).
According to the published data and figures from the Department of Statistics Malaysia [
79,
80,
81,
82,
83,
84,
85,
86,
87], the urban population in Peninsula Malaysia had been increasing rapidly (
Table 14). In comparison to the forest area statistics from the Department of Forestry [
53,
54,
55,
56,
57,
58,
59], an inverse correlation was identified in SPSS as:
R2adj = 0.964, SE = 0.175, p < 0.012
FA = Forest area (Million hectare)
Urb-pop = Urban population in Peninsula Malaysia (Millions)
The inverse correlation between urban population and the forest area in Peninsula Malaysia implies that urban development has significant correlations with deforestation (
Figure 8). On the other hand, the deforestation has a direct impact on runoff amount as shown in
Figure 9.
Table 14.
Decadal urban population and forest area in Peninsula Malaysia [
12,
80,
81,
82,
83,
84,
85,
86,
87].
Table 14.
Decadal urban population and forest area in Peninsula Malaysia [
12,
80,
81,
82,
83,
84,
85,
86,
87].
Year | Urban Population (Millions) | Forest Area (Millions Hectare) |
---|
1970 | 2.03 | 8.01 |
1980 | 4.81 | 6.35 |
1990 | 7.97 | 6.27 |
2000 | 12.26 | 5.97 |
3.6. Decadal λ and Ia
In recent decades, urbanization in Peninsula Malaysia has caused uneven land development, leading to non-homogeneity in catchments. This study aimed to address this issue by calibrating the SCS-CN model using rainfall-runoff data from different decades to develop decadal models. The models demonstrated a strong ability to estimate runoff amounts, achieving a Nash-Sutcliffe Index ranging from 0.907 to 0.958 (
Table 8), even in non-homogeneous catchments. These findings suggest that recalibrating the SCS-CN models based on regional and decadal specific rainfall-runoff conditions could be an effective approach for estimating runoff in non-homogeneous catchments.
In a previous study by the authors, the optimum
λ value for the entire DID HP 27 dataset was identified as 0.051 to model overall runoff conditions. However, in this study, different optimum
λ values were derived for the decadal datasets of M70, M80, and M90, which also led to changes in the corresponding initial abstraction (
Ia) values (
Table 7). Over time, the optimal
λ and
Ia values for each decade were found to decrease, indicating changes in land cover resulting from deforestation and urbanization that impact runoff conditions in rural catchments. The decreasing trend in
λ leads to a corresponding increase in runoff over time in Peninsula Malaysia.
SCS practitioners commonly calibrate CN0.2 with one batch of runoff data and validate the final results against another batch to determine the optimum CN0.2 value for modelling a combined dataset. However, this study highlights concerns with this practice due to land-use and land-cover changes in Peninsula Malaysia, which directly affect catchment runoff conditions over time.
There is a statistically significant upward trend in runoff (at alpha = 0.01) across all CN
0.2 classes from M70 to M90 due to changes in land use. Therefore, SCS practitioners must be cautious and aware that blindly accepting the
λ value as 0.2 is not advisable, and it is strongly recommended to derive a regional-specific
λ value. Although an optimum
λ value of 0.051 was used in a previous study [
50] to model the entire dataset with a Nash-Sutcliffe value of 0.92, it differed significantly from the optimum
λ values of different decades. Hence, runoff predictive models formulated with different optimum
λ values will yield differences in runoff predictions.
3.7. Rainfall Trend Analyses
The BCa bootstrapping method with a 99% confidence interval was used to analyse the monthly rainfall trend in Peninsula Malaysia (
Figure 10), which revealed that there has been no significant trend in the monthly rainfall over the past 20 years. The forecasted rainfall from 2021 to 2022 was consistent with the current trend. The results were supported by the model generated by Expert Modeler (
Figure 11), which indicated that there would be no significant alteration in the rainfall trend in the near future.
Flood occurrences are strongly influenced by changes in land use, including deforestation, agricultural activities, and urbanization. The conversion of natural land cover to urban and other developed land use can significantly alter the hydrological cycle, resulting in increased surface runoff and reduced infiltration. This alteration of the landscape can lead to changes in the frequency, magnitude, and timing of floods, as well as increased erosion and sedimentation in rivers and streams [
37].
The increase in surface runoff resulting from the conversion of natural land for human use has caused major flooding in Malaysia [
88]. Floods are the most destructive natural disasters in the country, with an estimated 85 river basins, mainly in Peninsula Malaysia, prone to recurrent flooding. Based on a study in 2014, approximately 9% of the total area of Malaysia, covering 29,800 km
2, is vulnerable to flood disaster, affecting almost 4.82 million people, equivalent to 22% of the total population [
89]. In 2014, the states of Johor, Kelantan, Pahang, Perak, and Terengganu in Peninsula Malaysia, which were severely affected by floods, also recorded high rates of forest loss [
38].
Recent floods and landslides in Malaysia have been attributed to deforestation, which results in the release of sediment and weakened soil. Trees help to prevent sediment runoffs and hold water, making them an essential factor in maintaining a stable environment. The excessive clear-cutting of trees for oil palm plantations has been identified as the primary cause of mudslides in recent times, with poor construction standards also contributing to the problem. Therefore, it can be inferred that deforestation and poor construction standards are the key factors responsible for these events, rather than El Niño or global warming, as suggested by studies [
90,
91,
92,
93,
94].