Next Article in Journal
Water Use in Livestock Agri-Food Systems and Its Contribution to Local Water Scarcity: A Spatially Distributed Global Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Investigating Algal Sensor Utilization Methods for Three-Dimensional Algal Control Technology Evaluation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hydrogeochemical Characteristics of the Geothermal System in the Woka-Cuona Rift Zone, Tibet
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gallium Isotope Effect of Ga-Si Complex Solutions in Water: Theoretical Study Based on Density Functional Theory

1
State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification, School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China
2
School of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China
Water 2024, 16(12), 1680; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16121680
Submission received: 6 May 2024 / Revised: 3 June 2024 / Accepted: 7 June 2024 / Published: 12 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Isotope Geochemistry of Groundwater: Latest Advances and Prospects)

Abstract

:
A Ga isotope is a new proxy for different geochemical processes such as a weathering process, solution process, etc. Si (Si(OH)4) is ubiquitous in natural water bodies. However, studies on the Ga isotope effect about a Ga3+ aqueous solution reacting with Si (Si(OH)4) are lacking. In this study, the Ga isotope effect of this process will be studied using a theoretical calculation method based on first principles. The results show that the heavy Ga (71Ga) isotope enrichment ability of different Ga-Si complex solutions is different. The 1000lnβ (‰) sequence of different Ga-Si complex solutions is (OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 ≈ (OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 > (OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 > (H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 > (OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30. The results show that there are two different reaction mechanisms when a Ga3+ aqueous solution reacts with Si-bearing (Si(OH)4) water; that is, six-coordination Ga-Si complexes and four-coordination Ga-Si complexes are formed at low pH (acidic) and high pH (alkaline), respectively. Compared with a Ga-Si complex aqueous solution under acidic conditions, Ga-Si aqueous solutions under alkaline conditions preferentially enriched the heavy Ga isotope (71Ga). The Ga isotope fractionation factors (α) between Ga-Si complex solutions and Ga3+-bearing aqueous solutions are all negative, which indicates that light Ga (69Ga) isotopes preferentially enter the structure of Ga-Si complexes during the formation of Ga-Si complex solutions. At 50 °C, the Ga isotope fractionation factors (1000lnα) of five systems ((H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 vs. [Ga(H2O)6]3+(aq), (OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 vs. [Ga(H2O)6]3+(aq), (OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 vs. [Ga(OH)3](aq), (OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 vs. [Ga(OH)3](aq), and (OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 vs. [Ga(OH)3](aq)) involved in this study are −0.12, −0.22, −0.07, −0.09, and −0.16 (‰), respectively. Excitedly, Si can affect the enrichment ability of the heavy Ga isotope (71Ga) in Ga-bearing complex aqueous solutions. This means that when Si is present in aqueous solutions, the enrichment capacity of the heavy Ga isotope (71Ga) of aqueous solutions will be effectively reduced. Ga in sediments is mainly derived from soluble Ga in the form of adsorbed (Fe, Mn) oxides/hydroxides, and the Ga isotope composition in sediments is heavier than that in basalt. The formation process of Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions influences the Ga isotope fractionation effect and also contributes to the composition of Ga isotopes in sediments. These key Ga isotope fractionation parameters obtained in this study will provide theoretical support for better explaining the reaction mechanism of Ga3+ complexes and Si-bearing (Si(OH)4) water bodies in solution processes and Ga isotope geochemical cycles.

1. Introduction

Gallium (Ga) is located in group IIIA of the periodic table, the same group as Aluminum (Al), which is the most abundant metallic element in the Earth’s crust. Al is involved in many geochemical processes in Earth science. Unfortunately, Al has no stable isotope. The geochemical process of Al can be studied by using the Ga isotope and relevant research work has appeared in this respect [1]. Based on the absolute isotopic composition of Ga, the atomic mass of Ga is 69.72/69.74 [2,3]. Ga has two stable isotopes, 69Ga and 71Ga, with relative abundances of 60.1 and 39.9%, respectively [4,5]. The relative mass difference between the two isotopes of Ga is very large.
Now, Ga is a new proxy indicating various geological processes. It is only in the past decade that the study of Ga isotopes has become more and more focused on. Early studies on Ga mostly stayed in the field of obtaining some basic physicochemical properties such as atomic mass, isotope abundance, and commercial applications of Ga isotopes [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. With the development of isotope analysis accuracy and improvement in methods, the Ga isotope has been applied more and more in geology, astrochemistry, environmental science, and other fields [1,6,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Like Al, Ga is not particularly mobile during weathering [1,28]. Połedniok studied Ga-bearing speciations in soil by a sequential extraction procedure developed by Tessier et al. [28,29]. It was found that the concentration of Ga in soil was mainly related to the regional and total gallium concentration. The enrichment in Ga in some areas is mainly due to the extreme migration of Ga [30]. It is worth mentioning that Ga is a moderately volatile element and has important applications in astrochemistry, such as studying the early formation and evolution of celestial bodies [11]. Some progress has also been made in studying the behavior of the Ga isotope in the evaporation process. In recent years, research using Ga isotopes to study the genesis of ore deposits, the weathering of surface rocks, and the process of soil formation has also emerged [12,13,15,16]. It is found that compared with basalts, the sediments are more enriched with the heavy Ga isotope (71Ga) [13]. The main reason for this phenomenon is that the Ga in the sediment is mainly from the soluble Ga in the aqueous solution; that is, the solution process has an important effect on the Ga isotopic composition of the sediment. These works are of great significance to the study of the Ga isotope geochemical cycle. Ga is a kind of trace element in the Earth’s crust and it rarely forms independent minerals. In most cases, Ga could enter the lattice of other minerals as a doped element. That is why Ga was discovered so late. The formation of many Ga-bearing minerals is closely related to the sedimentary process. Therefore, the sedimentary environment is closely related to the Ga isotope composition of minerals. Among them, the solution/hydrothermal solution plays an important role in the formation of minerals. This is also an important reason for the urgent completion of this work.
Although great progress has been made in the experimental study of Ga isotope compositions for different samples (terrestrial samples and extraterrestrial samples), the mechanism of the difference in Ga isotopic composition of different samples is still not well understood. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explain the mechanism of Ga isotope fractionation from the molecular level. Fortunately, since the birth of two outstanding works in the field of the theoretical calculation of geochemistry [31,32], the use of theoretical calculation methods to obtain the key parameter in the field of geochemistry (equilibrium stable isotope fractionation factor, α) has become a routine method and has achieved fruitful research results [33,34,35,36,37,38]. The emergence of these theoretical works has strongly promoted the rapid development of the subject of geochemistry.
In this research, the Ga isotope effect between a Si-bearing aqueous solution and Ga3+-bearing aqueous solutions is studied based on theoretical calculation. When Si (Si(OH)4) is contained in an aqueous solution, the aqua-complexes/hydroxides (such as [Ga(H2O)6]3+(aq) and [Ga(OH)3](aq)) formed by Ga3+ and H2O/OH under different pH will react with Si(OH)4 to form various Ga-Si complexes. Potential Ga-Si complexes are (OH)3GaOSi(OH)3, (OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3, (OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3, (OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3, and (H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3 [39]. The speciation forms of these species can be determined using the ab initio method based on first principles, and the Ga isotope effects of these processes can be obtained using the Urey model [31,32]. In the simulation of an aqueous environment (solvation effect), the theoretical method used is the “water-droplet” method. This theoretical method has been proven to be a feasible and reasonable technical means by many researchers [26,36,38,40]. These key Ga isotope fractionation parameters obtained in this study will reveal the aqueous environment of Ga-Si complex solutions and the Ga isotope fractionation mechanism from the molecular level. Further, the database of Ga isotope geochemical cycle research will be enriched.

2. Methods

In the field of theoretical computational geochemistry, there have been two landmark research contributions, namely the work of Urey, Bigeleisen, and Mayer [31,32]. The important significance of their works is that the important parameter of isotope geochemistry (α) is derived and deduced from the basic theory of chemical thermodynamics (partition function). Since then, the theoretical calculation of geochemistry has become another important method to obtain the equilibrium stable isotope fractionation factor in addition to the experimental method and has achieved fruitful research results [26,33,34,36,37,38,41,42,43]. The theoretical basis of this research is based on the results of these two works [31,32]. In the process of obtaining the equilibrium stable isotope fractionation factor (α), the most important intermediate parameter is the reduced partition function ratio (RPFR, also known as β). For the research system involved in this study, take the Ga isotope exchange reaction between (H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 and [Ga(H2O)6]3+(aq) as an example:
H 2 O 5 G 69 a O S i O H 3 . H 2 O 30 + G 71 a ( H 2 O ) 6 ( a q ) 3 + = H 2 O 5 G 71 a O S i O H 3 . H 2 O 30 + G 69 a ( H 2 O ) 6 ( a q ) 3 +
Relative to the Ga isotope exchange reaction shown in Formula (1), the mathematical expression of its isotope fractionation parameter (β) is as follows:
RPFR = β = s 71 s 69 i 3 n 6 u i 69 u i 71 exp u i 69 / 2 exp u i 71 / 2 1 exp u i 71 1 exp u i 69
In Formula (2), 69 and 71 represent the two stable isotopes of Ga, namely 69Ga and 71Ga, respectively. “s” represents the symmetry number of the system (molecule or molecular cluster). For the Ga-Si complex aqueous solution involved in this study, the molecular symmetry number does not change before and after the Ga isotope exchange reaction. When obtaining the isotope fractionation parameter (β) according to the theory of statistical thermodynamics, the largest contribution to β comes from the vibration frequency and the contribution of molecular translation and rotation terms can be ignored. Therefore, when calculating the β value of a Ga-Si complex aqueous solution, there is only one unknown, that is, simple harmonic vibration frequency. “ui” is a function of simple harmonic vibration frequency, and its theoretical expression is as follows:
u i = h ν i k b T
In Formula (3), h, kb, and T are known quantities, namely Planck’s constant, Boltzmann’s constant, and temperature in Kelvin. “vi” is the simple harmonic vibration frequencies of the system.
1000 ln β = a x 3 + b x 2 + c x + d
In Formula (4), a, b, c, and d represent the coefficient terms of variables of different powers, respectively. x is a function of temperature and the mathematical expression is
x = 10 6 T 2
In Formula (5), T is the absolute temperature (temperature in Kelvin).
The equilibrium stable isotope fractionation factor (1000lnα) is widely used in the field of geochemistry. The theoretical calculation formula (taking system (H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 vs. [Ga(H2O)6]3+(aq) as an example) is shown as follows:
1000 ln α H 2 O 5 G a O S i O H 3 . H 2 O 30 v s   G a H 2 O 6 ( a q ) 3 + = 1000 ln β H 2 O 5 G a O S i O H 3 . H 2 O 30 β G a H 2 O 6 ( a q ) 3 + = 1000 ln β H 2 O 5 G a O S i O H 3 . H 2 O 30 - 1000 ln β G a H 2 O 6 ( a q ) 3 +
After obtaining the simple harmonic vibration frequencies of the system, the equilibrium stable isotope fractionation factor can be obtained by combining Formulas (2), (3), and (6). Therefore, how to accurately obtain the harmonic vibrational frequency of the study system becomes the key to accurately calculate the equilibrium stable isotope fractionation factor (α). When obtaining the equilibrium stable isotope fractionation factor by theoretical calculation, there is only one independent variable, that is, temperature.
By Formula (6), the equilibrium stable isotope fractionation factor calculated theoretically (1000lnα) is associated with the isotope fractionation value obtained experimentally (Δ). The method for obtaining equilibrium stable isotope fractionation factors (Δ) between different substances experimentally is shown in Formula (7), i.e.,
Δ A B = δ A δ B
In Formula (7), A and B represent two different substances or two different phases of the same substance. δ represents the isotope composition of different substances (phases).
In this study, the theoretical calculation software package of Gaussian 16 with the theoretical basis set B3LYP/6-311+G(d, p) is used to obtain the harmonic vibrational frequencies of the research systems [44,45,46]. The version of Gaussian 16 used in this study is Revision B.01. The B3LYP method has been used to study the isotope effects of various systems by previous researchers [33,36,45,47]. Among them, Li et al. (2009) used the B3LYP/6-311+G(d, p) theoretical level to systematically study the isotope fractionation factors of Ge (the adjacent element of Ga) and its geological applications [36]. The work of Bruin et al. (1999) recommends a theoretical basis of 6-311+G(d, p) for the study of the geometry and electronic structure of Cu-bearing complexes [47]. Ga is located in the fourth period of the periodic table, which is the same period as Cu and Ge. It is reasonable to use B3LYP/6-311+G(d, p) for the structural optimization and harmonic vibrational frequency calculations of Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions. The “water-droplet” method is used to deal with the solvation effect of the Ga-Si complex aqueous solution. This method has been widely used to study solvation effects of different stable isotope systems [36,38,48,49].

3. Results

3.1. Structural Characteristics of Ga-Si Complexes after Optimization

The information on bond length and bond angle of the optimized Ga-Si complex aqueous solution is given in Table 1. Figure 1 shows the inner layer coordination space structure of the five Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions. Figure 2 shows the spatial structure of different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions (with 30 water molecules added to the inner layer). The bond length, bond angle, and spatial structure of Ga-Si complexes with different ligand types are different. As the ligands of Ga-Si complexes change from H2O to OH, the spatial structures of Ga-Si complexes also change from hexa-coordinate (octahedral) to four-coordinate (tetrahedral). Previous experimental findings through the high-resolution X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) also gave the same conclusion [39]. Therefore, the theoretical calculation results are in good agreement with the experimental results. Moreover, with the increase in OH ligands in Ga-Si complexes, the Ga-O bond length of bridge-oxygen in the structure gradually increased from 1.82 Å ((H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3) to 1.87 Å ((OH)3GaOSi(OH)3) (Table 1). The concentration of OH ligands is mainly affected by the pH of a water body. Therefore, the pH of water is an important factor that determines the type of Ga-Si complexes and affects the equilibrium Ga stable isotope fractionation effect.

3.2. Ga Isotope Fractionation Parameters (1000lnβ) of Different Ga-Si Complex Aqueous Solutions

In this study, the structures of five different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions were optimized and their simple vibration frequencies were calculated. Based on the simple harmonic vibration frequencies of these structures, their Ga isotope fractionation parameters (1000lnβ) could be obtained. When calculating the parameters for each species, it is necessary to optimize the structure of a series of molecular clusters with different numbers of water molecules and calculate their harmonic vibration frequencies. Taking (OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3 as an example, it was defined as the inner coordination structure. When simulating the solvation effect, water molecules are added to the periphery of (OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3 in batches in groups of 6H2O until the (OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 structure is obtained. (OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 is selected as the structure of the (OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3 complex aqueous solution. This is because when the number of water molecules exceeds 30, its Ga isotope fractionation parameter (1000lnβ) will no longer change (Figure 3). Therefore, when calculating the relevant parameters (such as 1000lnβ) for each species, five structures with different numbers of water molecules (6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 water molecules) should be calculated. To ensure the accuracy and rationality of the calculation results, the structure of each molecular cluster is calculated four times in parallel, labeled A, B, C, and D. In the study of these five Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions, the structure optimization and simple harmonic vibration frequency calculation of more than 100 molecular clusters will be needed. Table 2 shows the energies of the optimized structures of all Ga-Si complex clusters. As can be seen from Table 2, the maximum energy difference of all molecular clusters is only 0.02 Hartree (four parallel computations of the same structure). Hence, from the point of view of energy difference, the results of these theoretical calculations are reasonable. Ga isotope fractionation parameters (1000lnβ) of five Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions are listed in detail in Table 3. In the temperature range of 0~500 °C, Ga isotope fractionation parameters (1000lnβ) of these five Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions ((OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30, (OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30, (OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30, (H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30, and (OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30) ranged from 8.24~1.15, 8.35~1.16, 8.38~1.17, 6.75~0.92, and 6.62~0.90 (‰), respectively. In Table 3, the 1000lnβs of Ga-Si aqueous solutions with 6, 12, 16, 24, and 30 water molecules are the arithmetic means of four parallel calculations (A, B, C, and D). The polynomial expansion coefficients of 1000lnβs for different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions are shown in Table 4. The Ga isotope fractionation parameters (1000lnβ) of these Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions as a function of temperature are shown in Figure 4. According to Formula (1), that is, the polynomial expansion of 1000lnβ, the value of 1000lnβ at any temperature can be easily obtained (in the temperature range of 0~500 °C).

3.3. Ga Isotope Fractionation Factors (1000lnα) between Different Ga-Si Complex Aqueous Solutions and Ga3+-Bearing Aqua-Complex/Hydroxide Solutions

Si is a very widely distributed non-metallic element in nature and its content in the Earth’s crust is very considerable. Si is found in water, mainly in the form of Si(OH)4. Ga3+-bearing aqueous solutions at different pH will react with Si(OH)4 to form various Ga-Si complexes. The core content of this study is to study the Ga isotope fractionation effect of this chemical reaction process. Under different temperature conditions, the equilibrium Ga stable isotope fractionation factors (1000lnα) between different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions and Ga3+-bearing aqueous solutions are shown in Table 5. The variations of equilibrium Ga stable isotope fractionation factors (1000lnα) between different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions and Ga3+-bearing aqueous solutions with temperature are shown in Figure 5.

4. Discussion

4.1. Influence of Ga-Si Complex Structures on the Ga Isotope Fractionation Effect

It has become a consensus in the field of isotope geochemistry that the types of ligands, the spatial structures of the complexes, and the coordination bonds (chemical bonds) can significantly affect the isotope fractionation effect. The morphology and structural information of Ga adsorbed on calcite, magnesite, and δ-MnO2 surfaces were systematically studied [50]. Persson et al. (2006) used quantitative adsorption experiments, extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy, and surface complexation modeling to investigate the adsorption of Ga(III) at the water–α-FeOOH (goethite) interface [51]. Previous studies have shown that under acidic conditions, the Ga-O bond length of the first Ga coordination shell is 1.81 ± 0.01 Å [39]. In this study, the optimization result for Ga-O bond length in the first Ga coordination shell of (H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3 (acidic conditions) is 1.82 Å, which is in good agreement with the results of the Si-bearing aqueous solution analyzed by EXAFS [39,52] (Table 1). Under alkaline conditions, previous studies have found that Ga-Si bond lengths are 3.12–3.20 Å [39] and 3.11–3.14 Å [52], respectively. The results of this study show that Ga-Si bond lengths vary from 3.15 to 3.17 Å ((OH)3GaOSi(OH)3 and (OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3) (Table 1). Under acidic conditions, previous studies showed that the Ga-Si bond length varied in the range of 3.20 ± 0.03 Å [39], and the Ga-Si bond length of (OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3 in this study was 3.17 Å. Previous research results showed that the variation range of Ga-O-Si bond angles was 125°–135° [39], and the results of this study showed that the variation range of Ga-O-Si bond angles was 121°–131°. When the content of Ga and Si in the water body is low, it mainly exists in the form of monomer complexes, that is, Ga ( OH ) n ( H 2 O ) 6 - n 3 - n (n = 0–3) and Si OH 4 . At low pH, the coordination number of Ga in Ga-Si complexes is 6, and at high pH, the coordination number of Ga-Si complexes is 4 [39]. The results of this study show that the coordination number of the inner layer of (H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 and (OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 is 6 (6Ga-O bonds, octahedral structure). The inner layer structures of (OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30, (OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30, and (OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 have a coordination number of 4 (4Ga-O bonds, tetrahedral structure). The theoretical results show that the theoretical optimizations of Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions are in good agreement with the experimental results [39,52].

4.2. The 1000lnβs of Different Ga-Si Complex Aqueous Solutions

In the field of theoretical geochemical calculation, the β value is a key intermediate parameter for the calculation of the isotope fractionation factor (α), which is a parameter of geochemical concern. It has no theoretical and practical significance to study the absolute data size of β. A more valuable operation is to compare the size of βs between different species. The general rule is that under the same environmental conditions, the greater the β value, the stronger the ability of the species to enrich heavy isotopes. The 1000lnβ (‰) changes of these five Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions are as follows: (OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 ≈ (OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 > (OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 > (H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 > (OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30. As can be seen from Figure 3, at 25 °C, the 1000lnβs of these five Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions are divided into two relatively large ranges, that is, 5.6~6.0 (‰) ((H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 and (OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30) and 6.6~7.2 (‰) ((OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30, (OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30, and (OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30). This also shows that there are two different types of chemical reaction mechanisms when Si(OH)4 reacts with the hydrated/hydroxyl complexes of Ga3+. When the coordination number of the hydrated/hydroxyl complexes of Ga3+ is 4 and 6, there are two different reaction mechanisms. The 1000lnβs of (OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 and (OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 complex aqueous solutions were not significantly different (7.16 and 7.14‰ at 25 °C, respectively). The reason for this phenomenon is that the coordination structure of these two Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions is the same. This can be seen from the structures of (OH)3GaOSi(OH)3 and (OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH) in Figure 1 and Figure 2. In the (OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3 complex, the two H2O do not enter the inner coordination structure of (OH)3GaOSi(OH)3; that is, Ga exists in the form of four-coordination. At 25 °C, the 1000lnβs of species (OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3 were 7.19, 7.17, 7.15, 7.13, 7.17, and 7.16 (‰) for clusters with different water molecule numbers (0, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30), respectively. The difference between these 1000lnβs is very small. This is because previous studies have found that the isotope fractionation effect is a local effect, and the largest contribution to isotope fractionation is H2O near the inner layer structure of Ga-Si complexes. The contribution of the external H2O to the isotope fractionation effect decreases with increasing distance [53]. Therefore, when choosing the optimal model of Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions, the structures with 30H2O are reasonable. Other Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions have the same rule (see Figure 3).

4.3. Equilibrium Ga Stable Isotope Fractionation Factors of Ga-Si Complexes in Natural Waters (1000lnα, ‰)

The latest research has been able to use the Ga to trace ocean water [24]. However, there are no reports on the use of the Ga isotope as a technical means to trace water bodies. This section will discuss equilibrium Ga stable isotope fractionation factors of Ga-Si complexes in natural waters in depth. When discussing the equilibrium Ga stable isotope fractionation factors (1000lnα) of Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions, the corresponding non-Si aqueous solution species are [Ga(H2O)6]3+(aq) and [Ga(OH)3](aq), respectively. The reasons for this operation will be explained in the second half of this section. The data of the isotope fractionation parameter (1000lnβ) for these two substances used in this study are derived from the previous work of our research group [26].
The results of this study show that the general trend of the equilibrium stable Ga isotope fractionation effect between different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions and non-Si aqueous solution species ([Ga(H2O)6]3+(aq) and [Ga(OH)3](aq)) is that Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions will lose heavy Ga (71Ga) isotopes compared with species in aqueous solutions without Si (Table 4 and Figure 4). In the temperature range of 0~500 °C, the equilibrium stable Ga isotope fractionation factors (1000lnαs) of these five systems ((H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 vs. [Ga(H2O)6]3+(aq), (OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 vs. [Ga(H2O)6]3+(aq), (OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 vs. [Ga(OH)3](aq), (OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 vs. [Ga(OH)3](aq), and (OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 vs. [Ga(OH)3](aq)) are as follows: −0.16~−0.03, −0.29~−0.05, −0.06~−0.02, −0.09~−0.03, and −0.2~−0.04 (‰) (Table 4). At 50 °C, the equilibrium Ga stable isotope fractionation factors of these five systems are −0.12, −0.22, −0.07, −0.09, and −0.16 (‰), respectively. At this temperature, the equilibrium Ga stable isotope fractionation effect is very obvious. The equilibrium Ga stable isotope fractionation factors of these systems are all negative, which indicates that light Ga (69Ga) isotopes preferentially enter the structure of Ga-Si complexes during the formation of Ga-Si complexes. The fundamental reason for this is that 69Ga has a smaller atomic mass than 71Ga.
Previous studies have found that when Ga is adsorbed to the mineral surface, the Ga isotope fractionation factors between the solid phase and the solution phase (Δsolid-solution) can reach up to −1.27‰ (calcite) and −0.89‰ (goesite) [14]. This also shows that when adsorption occurs, the light Ga isotope (69Ga) is preferentially adsorbed to the mineral surface. In a natural water body, the distribution of Si is very wide. Various Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions formed by the reaction between Ga3+-bearing and Si-bearing solutions will affect the Ga isotope effect in different processes such as adsorption. Previous studies on the Ga isotope effect in different Ga-bearing deposits have found that the difference in Ga isotope composition in different Ga-bearing deposits is relatively large. The Ga isotope composition of claystone with kaolinite as its main mineral component is −0.22‰ to +0.19‰, and that for bauxite with diaspore as its main mineral component is −0.60‰ to 0.15‰. The Ga isotope composition of dolostone from the Loushanguan group is −0.28‰ to −0.18‰ [12]. This difference in Ga isotope composition may be closely related to their sedimentary environment (species morphology, pH, etc.). The Ga isotope fractionation effect in the formation of Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions covered in this study can also indicate that the solution process has a significant influence on the Ga isotope composition of the deposit.
There is relatively little work involving Ga3+ aqueous species [1]. Similar to Al3+, Ga3+ is also subject to hydrolysis in aqueous solutions, which is why the species of Ga3+ in aqueous solutions are mainly hydration/hydroxide complexes. Previous studies have also found that the species morphology of Ga3+ in an aqueous solution is a function of pH and temperature [54]. It was also indicated that the hydrolysis reaction of Ga3+ mainly occurred at low pH, and the morphology of Ga3+-bearing species was strongly influenced by Ga(OH)4 (25 °C). In natural fluid systems, Ga(OH)4 is the dominant Ga3+-bearing species. At constant pH, the hydrolysis of Ga3+ is strongly affected by temperature [1]. As a typical dispersive element, researchers mostly study Ga with elements that have similar properties (such as Al3+, Fe3+, etc.). The main indexes involved are the element differentiation, migration ability, hydrolysis reaction, and so on. These important studies can reveal the geochemical behavior of Ga3+ in natural fluid systems. Unfortunately, the reality is that there are few studies on the Ga isotope fractionation effect in solution systems. This also limits the geochemical application of Ga as a new proxy. In this study, the Ga isotope effects of five Ga-Si complex systems were studied to fill this gap to some extent. Based on the previous work of our research group, the theoretical calculation of the equilibrium stable Ga isotope fractionation effect in a Si-bearing solution environment should be helpful to better understand the geochemical behavior of Ga3+ in solution processes and the geochemical cycle of the Ga isotope [26].

5. Conclusions

In this study, Ga geochemical parameters (isotope fractionation effect, α) of Si-bearing solution processes were systematically studied using the ab initio method based on first principles. Some preliminary results were obtained: (1) Species morphology, pH, and temperature are the key factors affecting the Ga isotope effect. (2) During the formation of Ga-Si complexes, Ga3+ mainly enters the Ga-Si complex structures in the form of four and six coordination structures; that is, the reactions between Ga3+-bearing aqueous solutions and Si(OH)4 have two different mechanisms, and are significantly affected by the pH value. (3) Similar to the existing Ga isotope effect involved in the Ga3+ adsorption process, the light Ga isotope (69Ga) will preferentially react when forming Ga-Si complexes. This research investigated the effect of Si (Si(OH)4) on the isotope fractionation of Ga-bearing complex aqueous solution from the molecular level. As a new technology, there is limited research about the Ga isotope effect in different geochemical processes, such as weathering, fluid, adsorption, and biological processes. By far, the in-depth study of the Ga isotope effect in the interaction between Ga and Si in a solution is temporarily lacking. The acquisition of these key Ga isotope fractionation parameters will fill the gap in the study of the Ga isotope fractionation effect in the solution processes that contain Si. At the same time, the geochemical behavior and geochemical cycle of Ga can be better revealed. With the rise in Ga isotope research, more and more studies involving the Ga isotope effect will appear. Shortly, the application of the Ga isotope as a geochemical proxy will be more and more mature and extensive.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42063007), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41663007), and Science and Technology Program of Guizhou [Qianshixinmiao [2021]23]. And the APC was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42063007).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yuan, W.; Chen, J.; Teng, H.; Chetelat, B.; Cai, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Bouchez, J.; Moynier, F.; Gaillardet, J.; et al. A Review on the Elemental and Isotopic Geochemistry of Gallium. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2021, 35, e2021GB007033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. de Laeter, J.R.; Rosman, K.J.R. The atomic weight of gallium. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 1976, 21, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Marinenko, G. On the atomic weight of gallium. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. Sect. A Phys. Chem. 1977, 81, 409–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. De Laeter, J.R. The isotopic composition and elemental abundance of gallium in meteorites and in terrestrial samples. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1972, 36, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Machlan, L.A.; Gramlich, J.W.; Powell, L.J.; Lambert, G.M. Absolute Isotopic Abundance Ratio and Atomic Weight Of a Reference Sample of Gallium. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 1986, 91, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Inghram, M.G.; Hess, D.C.; Brown, H.S.; Goldberg, E. On the Isotopic Composition of Meteoritic and Terrestrial Gallium. Phys. Rev. 1948, 74, 343–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gramlich, J.W.; Machlan, L.A. Isotopic variations in commercial high-purity gallium. Anal. Chem. 1985, 57, 1788–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Machlan, L.A.; Gramlich, J.W. Isotopic fractionation of gallium on an ion-exchange column. Anal. Chem. 1988, 60, 37–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kato, C.; Moynier, F.; Foriel, J.; Teng, F.-Z.; Puchtel, I.S. The gallium isotopic composition of the bulk silicate Earth. Chem. Geol. 2017, 448, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kato, C.; Moynier, F. Gallium isotopic evidence for extensive volatile loss from the Moon during its formation. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kato, C.; Moynier, F. Gallium isotopic evidence for the fate of moderately volatile elements in planetary bodies and refractory inclusions. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2017, 479, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wen, H.; Ling, K.; Zhu, C.; Fan, H.; Shen, N. Gallium isotope fractionation in the Xiaoshanba bauxite deposit, central Guizhou Province, southwestern China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 137, 104299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Liao, S.; Tao, C.; Wen, H.; Fan, H.; Wen, J.; Yang, W.; Li, W. Ga isotopic fractionation in sulfides from the Yuhuang and Duanqiao hydrothermal fields on the Southwest Indian Ridge. Geosci. Front. 2021, 12, 101137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yuan, W.; Saldi, G.D.; Chen, J.; Vetuschi Zuccolini, M.; Birck, J.-L.; Liu, Y.; Schott, J. Gallium isotope fractionation during Ga adsorption on calcite and goethite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2018, 223, 350–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yuan, W.; Gong, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, Z.; Huang, F.; Yang, X.; Chetelat, B.; Teng, H.; Schott, J. Gallium isotope constraints on the intense weathering of basalt. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2022, 333, 22–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yuan, W.; Wang, Z.; Saldi, G.D.; Cai, H.; Zheng, W.; Schott, J.; Chen, J. Gallium isotope fractionation during precipitation of α-GaOOH from aqueous solution. Chem. Geol. 2024, 646, 121923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pokrovski, G.S.; Borisova, A.Y.; Bychkov, A.Y. Speciation and Transport of Metals and Metalloids in Geological Vapors. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2013, 76, 165–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Breiter, K.; Gardenová, N.; Kanický, V.; Vaculovič, T. Gallium and germanium geochemistry during magmatic fractionation and post-magmatic alteration in different types of granitoids: A case study from the Bohemian Massif (Czech Republic). Geol. Carpathica 2013, 64, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, T.; Zhou, L.; Yang, L.; Wang, Q.; Feng, L.-P.; Liu, Y.-S. High precision measurements of gallium isotopic compositions in geological materials by, M.C.-I.C.P.-M.S. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2016, 31, 1673–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yuan, W.; Chen, J.B.; Birck, J.L.; Yin, Z.Y.; Yuan, S.L.; Cai, H.M.; Wang, Z.W.; Huang, Q.; Wang, Z.H. Precise Analysis of Gallium Isotopic Composition by MC-ICP-MS. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 9606–9613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. El Korh, A.; Luais, B.; Boiron, M.-C.; Deloule, E.; Cividini, D. Investigation of Ge and Ga exchange behaviour and Ge isotopic fractionation during subduction zone metamorphism. Chem. Geol. 2017, 449, 165–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Feng, L.-P.; Zhou, L.; Liu, J.; Hu, Z.-C.; Liu, Y.-S. Determination of Gallium Isotopic Compositions in Reference Materials. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 2019, 43, 701–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wimpenny, J.; Marks, N.; Knight, K.; Borg, L.; Badro, J.; Ryerson, F. Constraining the behavior of gallium isotopes during evaporation at extreme temperatures. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2020, 286, 54–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Whitmore, L.M.; Pasqualini, A.; Newton, R.; Shiller, A.M. Gallium: A New Tracer of Pacific Water in the Arctic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 2020, 125, e2019JC015842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wimpenny, J.; Borg, L.; Sio, C.K.I. The gallium isotopic composition of the Moon. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2022, 578, 117318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, J. First-principles calculations of equilibrium Ga isotope fractionations between several important Ga-bearing minerals and aqueous solutions. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 6230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Render, J.; Wimpenny, J.; Borg, L. Gallium isotopic constraints for the origin of the Earth-Moon system. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2023, 611, 118146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Poledniok, J. Speciation of scandium and gallium in soil. Chemosphere 2008, 73, 572–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tessier, A.; Campbell, P.G.C.; Bisson, M. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal. Chem. 1979, 51, 844–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nuamah, D.O.B.; Kwaah Tandoh, K.; Brako, B. Geochemistry of Minor and Trace Elements in Soils of Akuse Area, Southeastern Ghana. Geosciences 2019, 9, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Urey, H.C. The thermodynamic properties of isotopic substances. J. Chem. Soc. 1947, 562–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bigeleisen, J.; Mayer, M.G. Calculation of Equilibrium Constants for Isotopic Exchange Reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 1947, 15, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schauble, E.A. Applying Stable Isotope Fractionation Theory to New Systems. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2004, 55, 65–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Seo, J.H.; Lee, S.K.; Lee, I. Quantum chemical calculations of equilibrium copper (I) isotope fractionations in ore-forming fluids. Chem. Geol. 2007, 243, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sherman, D.M. Complexation of Cu+ in Hydrothermal NaCl Brines: Ab initio molecular dynamics and energetics. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2007, 71, 714–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, X.; Zhao, H.; Tang, M.; Liu, Y. Theoretical prediction for several important equilibrium Ge isotope fractionation factors and geological implications. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2009, 287, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, Q.; Tossell, J.A.; Liu, Y. On the proper use of the Bigeleisen–Mayer equation and corrections to it in the calculation of isotopic fractionation equilibrium constants. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2010, 74, 6965–6983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gao, C.; Liu, Y. First-principles calculations of equilibrium bromine isotope fractionations. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2021, 297, 65–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pokrovski, G.S.; Schott, J.; Hazemann, J.-L.; Farges, F.; Pokrovsky, O.S. An X-ray absorption fine structure and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of gallium–silica complexes in aqueous solution. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2002, 66, 4203–4222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, J. Equilibrium sulfur isotope fractionations of several important sulfides. Geochem. J. 2021, 55, 135–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Richet, P.; Bottinga, Y.; Javoy, M. A Review of Hydrogen, Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen, Sulphur, and Chlorine Stable Isotope Fractionation Among Gaseous Molecules. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1977, 5, 65–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sherman, D.M. Equilibrium isotopic fractionation of copper during oxidation/reduction, aqueous complexation and ore-forming processes: Predictions from hybrid density functional theory. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2013, 118, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fujii, T.; Moynier, F.; Blichert-Toft, J.; Albarède, F. Density functional theory estimation of isotope fractionation of Fe, Ni, Cu, and Zn among species relevant to geochemical and biological environments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2014, 140, 553–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Frisch, M.; Trucks, G.; Schlegel, H.; Scuseria, G.; Robb, M.; Cheeseman, J.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.; Nakatsuji, H. Gaussian 16 Revision B. 01, 2009; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  45. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R.G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 1988, 37, 785–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. de Bruin, T.J.M.; Marcelis, A.T.M.; Zuilhof, H.; Sudhölter, E.J.R. Geometry and electronic structure of bis-(glycinato)-CuII·2H2O complexes as studied by density functional B3LYP computations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1999, 1, 4157–4163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gao, C.; Cao, X.; Liu, Q.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, S.; He, Y.; Tang, M.; Liu, Y. Theoretical calculation of equilibrium Mg isotope fractionations between minerals and aqueous solutions. Chem. Geol. 2018, 488, 62–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, Y.; Tossell, J.A. Ab initio molecular orbital calculations for boron isotope fractionations on boric acids and borates. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2005, 69, 3995–4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pokrovsky, O.S.; Pokrovski, G.S.; Schott, J. Gallium(III) adsorption on carbonates and oxides: X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy study and surface complexation modeling. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2004, 279, 314–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Persson, P.; Zivkovic, K.; Sjoberg, S. Quantitative adsorption and local structures of gallium(III) at the water-alpha-FeOOH interface. Langmuir 2006, 22, 2096–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dooryhee, E.; Greaves, G.N.; Steel, A.T.; Townsend, R.P.; Carr, S.W.; Thomas, J.M.; Catlow, C.R.A. Structural studies of high-area zeolitic adsorbents and catalysts by a combination of high-resolution X-ray powder diffraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 1990, 89, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gibbs, G.V. Molecules as models for bonding in silicates. Am. Mineral. 1982, 67, 421–450. [Google Scholar]
  54. Benézéth, P.; Diakonov, I.I.; Pokrovski, G.S.; Dandurand, J.-L.; Schott, J.; Khodakovsky, I.L. Gallium speciation in aqueous solution. Experimental study and modelling: Part 2. Solubility of α-GaOOH in acidic solutions from 150 to 250 °C and hydrolysis constants of gallium (III) to 300 °C. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1997, 61, 1345–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A schematic diagram of inner layer coordination structures of different Ga-Si complexes. The brown circles, the red circles, the gray circles, and the pink circles represent the Si atoms, the oxygen atoms, the hydrogen atoms, and the Ga atoms, respectively. The theoretical method of B3LYP/6-311+G(d, p) is used to calculate harmonic vibrational frequencies.
Figure 1. A schematic diagram of inner layer coordination structures of different Ga-Si complexes. The brown circles, the red circles, the gray circles, and the pink circles represent the Si atoms, the oxygen atoms, the hydrogen atoms, and the Ga atoms, respectively. The theoretical method of B3LYP/6-311+G(d, p) is used to calculate harmonic vibrational frequencies.
Water 16 01680 g001
Figure 2. Spatial structures of different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions. A, B, C, and D stand for (OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30, (OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30, (OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30, (OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30, and (H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30. The theoretical method of B3LYP/6-311+G(d, p) is used to calculate harmonic vibrational frequencies.
Figure 2. Spatial structures of different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions. A, B, C, and D stand for (OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30, (OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30, (OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30, (OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30, and (H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30. The theoretical method of B3LYP/6-311+G(d, p) is used to calculate harmonic vibrational frequencies.
Water 16 01680 g002
Figure 3. Ga isotope fractionation parameters (1000lnβs) of Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions with different numbers of water molecules at 25 °C. The dashed rectangle shows 1000lnβ of the Ga-Si complex aqueous solution with 30 water molecules. When the number of water molecules exceeds 30, 1000lnβ will no longer change.
Figure 3. Ga isotope fractionation parameters (1000lnβs) of Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions with different numbers of water molecules at 25 °C. The dashed rectangle shows 1000lnβ of the Ga-Si complex aqueous solution with 30 water molecules. When the number of water molecules exceeds 30, 1000lnβ will no longer change.
Water 16 01680 g003
Figure 4. The diagram of Ga isotope fractionation parameters (1000lnβs) of different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions varies with temperature.
Figure 4. The diagram of Ga isotope fractionation parameters (1000lnβs) of different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions varies with temperature.
Water 16 01680 g004
Figure 5. The diagram of equilibrium stable isotope fractionation factors (1000lnαs) of different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions relative to Ga3+ free ion aqueous solutions varies with temperature.
Figure 5. The diagram of equilibrium stable isotope fractionation factors (1000lnαs) of different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions relative to Ga3+ free ion aqueous solutions varies with temperature.
Water 16 01680 g005
Table 1. The information of bond length and bond angle for the inner layer coordination structure of different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions after optimization. The theoretical method of B3LYP/6-311+G(d, p) is used to calculate harmonic vibrational frequencies.
Table 1. The information of bond length and bond angle for the inner layer coordination structure of different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions after optimization. The theoretical method of B3LYP/6-311+G(d, p) is used to calculate harmonic vibrational frequencies.
ParametersBond Length (Å)Bond Angle (°)
Species Ga-SiBridge ONon-Bridge O∠Ga-O-Si
Ga-OSi-OGa-OHGa-OH2
(OH)3GaOSi(OH)33.171.871.621.86 130.60
(OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)33.151.861.601.87 130.43
(OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)33.031.851.621.842.19121.02
(OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)33.171.851.611.812.13132.49
(H2O)5GaOSi(OH)33.091.821.63 2.05127.46
Table 2. The energies of structural optimization for Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions with different numbers of water molecules. n is the number of water molecules. The theoretical method of B3LYP/6-311+G(d, p) is used to calculate harmonic vibrational frequencies.
Table 2. The energies of structural optimization for Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions with different numbers of water molecules. n is the number of water molecules. The theoretical method of B3LYP/6-311+G(d, p) is used to calculate harmonic vibrational frequencies.
EnergyE(RB3LYP) (Hartree)
Species
n0 612182430
(OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)n−2898.64A−3357.50−3816.36−4275.22−4734.09−5192.95
B−3357.50−3816.37−4275.23−4734.10−5192.96
C−3357.51−3816.37−4275.23−4734.08−5192.95
D−3357.39−3816.35−4275.19−4734.05−5192.95
(OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)n−2898.13A−3357.00−3815.86−4274.72−4733.59−5192.44
B−3357.01−3815.87−4274.71−4733.57−5192.44
C−3357.00−3815.87−4274.73−4733.58−5192.47
D−3356.99−3815.86−4274.73−4733.60−5192.47
(OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)n−2745.18A−3204.05−3662.91−4121.77−4580.64−5039.49
B−3204.04−3662.92−4121.77−4580.62−5039.48
C−3204.04−3662.90−4121.77−4580.64−5039.47
D−3204.05−3662.91−4121.77−4580.62−5039.51
(H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)n−2899.24A−3358.19−3817.09−4275.96−4734.82−5193.70
B−3358.19−3817.08−4275.94−4734.82−5193.67
C−3358.19−3817.08−4275.96−4734.82−5193.66
D−3358.18−3817.08−4275.95−4734.81−5193.67
(OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)n−2899.01A−3357.90−3816.76−4275.63−4734.48−5193.34
B−3357.89−3816.76−4275.62−4734.49−5193.35
C−3357.89−3816.75−4275.62−4734.49−5193.35
D−3357.90−3816.77−4275.62−4734.49−5193.37
Table 3. Isotope fractionation parameters (1000lnβ) of different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions at temperatures 0, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 300, and 500 °C.
Table 3. Isotope fractionation parameters (1000lnβ) of different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions at temperatures 0, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 300, and 500 °C.
Temperature (°C)02550100150200300500
Species
(OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)37.776.65 5.75 4.41 3.49 2.82 1.95 1.09
(OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)67.766.63 5.73 4.39 3.47 2.80 1.94 1.08
(OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)128.086.90 5.96 4.57 3.61 2.92 2.02 1.13
(OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)188.116.93 5.99 4.59 3.62 2.93 2.03 1.13
(OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)248.156.96 6.02 4.61 3.64 2.95 2.04 1.14
(OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)308.247.05 6.09 4.67 3.69 2.98 2.07 1.15
(OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)38.437.20 6.22 4.77 3.76 3.04 2.11 1.17
(OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)68.377.15 6.17 4.73 3.74 3.02 2.09 1.17
(OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)128.327.11 6.14 4.71 3.72 3.01 2.08 1.16
(OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)188.277.06 6.10 4.68 3.69 2.99 2.07 1.15
(OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)248.337.12 6.14 4.71 3.72 3.01 2.08 1.16
(OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)308.357.14 6.16 4.72 3.73 3.02 2.09 1.16
(OH)3GaOSi(OH)38.417.19 6.21 4.76 3.76 3.04 2.10 1.17
(OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)68.397.17 6.20 4.75 3.75 3.03 2.10 1.17
(OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)128.367.15 6.17 4.73 3.73 3.02 2.09 1.17
(OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)188.357.13 6.16 4.72 3.73 3.01 2.08 1.16
(OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)248.407.17 6.19 4.75 3.75 3.03 2.10 1.17
(OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)308.387.16 6.18 4.73 3.74 3.02 2.09 1.17
(H2O)5GaOSi(OH)36.73 5.73 4.94 3.77 2.97 2.40 1.66 0.92
(H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)66.76 5.75 4.95 3.78 2.98 2.40 1.66 0.92
(H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)126.75 5.74 4.94 3.77 2.97 2.40 1.65 0.92
(H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)186.77 5.76 4.96 3.79 2.98 2.41 1.66 0.92
(H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)246.75 5.75 4.95 3.78 2.97 2.40 1.66 0.92
(H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)306.75 5.75 4.95 3.77 2.97 2.40 1.66 0.92
(OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)37.01 5.99 5.17 3.97 3.13 2.54 1.75 0.98
(OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)66.76 5.76 4.97 3.80 3.00 2.42 1.67 0.93
(OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)126.62 5.64 4.86 3.71 2.92 2.36 1.63 0.91
(OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)186.55 5.58 4.81 3.67 2.89 2.33 1.61 0.90
(OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)246.58 5.60 4.82 3.68 2.90 2.34 1.62 0.90
(OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)306.62 5.63 4.85 3.70 2.91 2.35 1.62 0.90
Table 4. The constant terms of polynomial expansion for Ga isotope fractionation parameters (1000lnβ) of different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions.
Table 4. The constant terms of polynomial expansion for Ga isotope fractionation parameters (1000lnβ) of different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions.
Parameterabcd
Species
(OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)307.0429 × 10−5−7.1015 × 10−36.9692 × 10−16.2006 × 10−3
(OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)301.1109 × 10−4−7.8732 × 10−37.0885 × 10−1−1.6438 × 10−3
(OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)306.1993 × 10−5−6.5505 × 10−37.0076 × 10−11.5884 × 10−2
(H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)304.2861 × 10−5−4.3055 × 10−35.5300 × 10−11.0022 × 10−2
(OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)306.9455 × 10−5−4.8448 × 10−35.4640 × 10−1−7.5287 × 10−4
Table 5. The equilibrium stable Ga isotope fractionation factors (1000lnα) between different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions and Ga3+ free ion aqueous solutions at different temperatures. “aq” stands for aqueous solution. The data of Ga isotope fractionation parameters (1000lnβ) for Ga3+ free ion aqueous solutions used are the data of the previously published article of our project [26].
Table 5. The equilibrium stable Ga isotope fractionation factors (1000lnα) between different Ga-Si complex aqueous solutions and Ga3+ free ion aqueous solutions at different temperatures. “aq” stands for aqueous solution. The data of Ga isotope fractionation parameters (1000lnβ) for Ga3+ free ion aqueous solutions used are the data of the previously published article of our project [26].
Temperature (°C)02550100150200300500
Species
(H2O)5GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 vs. [Ga(H2O)6]3+(aq)−0.16−0.14−0.12−0.1−0.08−0.06−0.04−0.03
(OH)(H2O)4GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 vs. [Ga(H2O)6]3+(aq)−0.29−0.26−0.22−0.17−0.14−0.11−0.08−0.05
(OH)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 vs. [Ga(OH)3](aq)−0.06−0.06−0.07−0.07−0.05−0.05−0.04−0.02
(OH)3(H2O)2GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 vs. [Ga(OH)3](aq)−0.09−0.08−0.09−0.08−0.06−0.05−0.04−0.03
(OH)2(H2O)3GaOSi(OH)3.(H2O)30 vs. [Ga(OH)3](aq)−0.2−0.17−0.16−0.13−0.1−0.09−0.06−0.04
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J. Gallium Isotope Effect of Ga-Si Complex Solutions in Water: Theoretical Study Based on Density Functional Theory. Water 2024, 16, 1680. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16121680

AMA Style

Zhang J. Gallium Isotope Effect of Ga-Si Complex Solutions in Water: Theoretical Study Based on Density Functional Theory. Water. 2024; 16(12):1680. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16121680

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jixi. 2024. "Gallium Isotope Effect of Ga-Si Complex Solutions in Water: Theoretical Study Based on Density Functional Theory" Water 16, no. 12: 1680. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16121680

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop