Next Article in Journal
Managing Agricultural Water Resources in the Southern Region: Perspectives of Crop Growers
Previous Article in Journal
Ecological and Health Risk Assessment of Nitrates and Heavy Metals in the Groundwater of the Alluvial Area of the Danube River near Kostolac Basin, Serbia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deformation Monitoring and Potential Risk Detection of In-Construction Dams Utilizing SBAS-InSAR Technology—A Case Study on the Datengxia Water Conservancy Hub
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Field Investigations and Service Life Assessment of Geosynthetic Filters in Tidally Influenced Revetments in Cases of Ochre Clogging

by
Lukas Tophoff
1,*,
Holger Schüttrumpf
2,
Frank Heimbecher
1,
Christian Vollmer
3,
Bodo Philipp
4,5 and
Yulduzkhon Abdullaeva
4
1
Institute for Infrastructure, Water, Resources, Environment (IWARU), FH Münster University of Applied Sciences, Corrensstraße 25, 48149 Münster, Germany
2
Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management (IWW), RWTH Aachen University, Mies-van-der-Rohe-Str. 17, 52074 Aachen, Germany
3
Institute for Mineralogy, University of Münster, Corrensstraße 24, 48149 Münster, Germany
4
Institute of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Münster, Corrensstraße 3, 48149 Münster, Germany
5
Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology, Auf dem Aberg 1, 57392 Schmallenberg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2024, 16(13), 1840; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16131840
Submission received: 5 June 2024 / Revised: 21 June 2024 / Accepted: 24 June 2024 / Published: 27 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Engineering Safety and Management)

Abstract

:
In recent decades, there have been individual cases of damage to the revetments of the German North Sea estuaries due to clogging by precipitated ochre products. This process is defined as ochre clogging and has been extensively explained in the literature. The primary aim of the investigations was to better understand the clogging process under in situ conditions and the causative environmental conditions surrounding the filters. Extensive in situ investigations were therefore carried out. It was found that a permeability reduction in geotextile filters can be strongly accelerated by ochre clogging, which appears to be a biogeochemical process. This describes a combined action of the chemical precipitation of iron and manganese, precipitation by microorganisms, and physical clogging. A further aim of this study was to establish limit values for the decisive ochre clogging parameters, which could be used to quantify the susceptibility to ochre clogging. It was shown that the determination of the iron and manganese content of the groundwater, as well as the redox capacity of the groundwater, is sufficient to assess the tendency for ochre clogging. To minimise the negative impact on filter performance, recommendations for an adapted filter design have been developed as a guide for planners.

1. Introduction

In Germany, approximately 340 km of all rivers and waterways are under the tidal influence of the North Sea. Where extensive riverbank protection is required, the riverbanks are generally secured with heavy technical revetments consisting of a permeable armour layer and a filter layer [1] (see Figure 1). These are exposed to various mechanical and transient hydraulic loads, such as wind- and ship-induced waves, water level fluctuations, and the resulting erosion processes, throughout their service lives. Therefore, revetments on inland waterways must be robustly designed to attain a service life of at least 50 years. Coastal revetments, on the other hand, are designed for a service life of up to 100 years [2]. A key component of revetments is the filter layer, which contributes to the stability of the revetment. It retains the fine material of the subsoil while maintaining the hydraulic conductivity to prevent the build-up of pore-water pressure [1]. The permeability of a filter can decrease with ageing due to physical and biochemical mechanisms [3,4,5]. The severe reduction in permeability exerted high hydrostatic pressure on the armour layers of various revetments in the German North Sea estuaries of the Ems and Weser, causing the armour layers to uplift. This has been described, for example, by Abromeit [6] in the case of revetment damage, in which the permeability was reduced after 8 to 9 years to such an extent that an essential filter function, i.e., permeability, was no longer fulfilled. This and other cases of damage have been attributed to ochre formation [6,7].
Ochre clogging, in general, has been extensively described in the literature and is summarised below based on the literature review [3,4,5,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Ochre formation is a chemical and/or biological process involving the precipitation of iron, manganese, and other substances in various chemical compounds [16]. The most important prerequisite for ochre formation, which is initiated by oxidation, is the presence of oxygen and/or iron or manganese bacteria in the soil, groundwater, or soil water [11], as well as dissolved iron or manganese. Mendonca et al. [13] described the problem and process as an increase in pore-water pressure in the soil or filter element associated with instability of the riverbank soil structure or a change in flow direction. These conditions can occur where, as a result of a change in flow direction, groundwater containing iron or manganese comes into contact with oxygen in the air or with oxygen-rich surface water. This can include the geotextile or granular filters in the revetments of tidal waterways [9]. The accumulation of the ochre-clogging products on the filter structure can be classified as internal clogging [9]. This can result in damage to the revetment if it fails due to the swelling of the filter (see Figure 1). Weidner [5] and Weidner et al. [8] investigated vertical granular filter wells in open pit mines, which are also prone to clogging due to hydrochemical conditions. As part of their work, the properties of various granular well-pack materials were evaluated concerning long-term Fe-clogging affinity. A comprehensive literature review on physical and geochemical processes in coastal areas related to iron precipitation in porous media was carried out by Cao et al. [15]. They described several approaches to model Fe precipitation. Mendonca et al. [13] carried out a study of ochre clogging of geotextiles, taking into account different levels of iron concentration, available dissolved oxygen, and pH value. The fundamental importance of iron bacterial activity, geotextile type, and environmental conditions for ochre formation was demonstrated in the laboratory tests. This study was later extended by Correia et al. [4]. The results showed that ochre formation decreased significantly in the submerged filters due to reduced oxygen availability for aerobic microbial activity. Liu et al. [14] conducted a series of column tests to study the mechanism of polyurethane foam to reduce the chemical clogging of nonwoven geotextile filters. They installed a polyurethane foam under the geotextile to reduce the oxygen availability in the filter layer. As a result, the extent of the chemical clogging of the geotextile was reduced.
As the cases of revetment damage occur locally and fully intact revetments can be found in close proximity to the damaged areas, the environmental conditions surrounding the filters need to be investigated in addition to the structural and filter properties. The environmental conditions were analysed in preliminary studies using external data sources [9]. Some filter technological adjustments implemented to slow down the accumulation of ochre-clogging products were described in preliminary experimental studies [3].
The primary aim of this study was to investigate the chemical (abiotic) and (micro)-biological parameters, as well as the hydraulic and structural boundary conditions, in estuaries with ochre formation phenomena, in order to record the environmental conditions surrounding ochre-clogged filters. Therefore, the results of this study are divided into a comprehensive description of the study areas and field observations. The environmental conditions surrounding the ochre-clogged filters are then described with reference to extensive in situ sampling and long-term studies. Criteria describing the ochre clogging tendencies of granular and geotextile filters are derived from these investigations. Finally, a workflow is proposed for the design of geotextile filters where they are susceptible to ochre clogging. This workflow is intended to make a significant contribution to the functional use of geotextile filters, even when they are susceptible to ochre clogging. The aim is to achieve the desired technical service life and economic and ecologic optimisation.

2. Study Areas and Methods

Based on an extensive literature review, enquiries about known damaged areas were made to all relevant national bodies (namely, the Federal Waterways and Shipping Administration (WSV)) whose areas of responsibility included the German North Sea estuaries. From these and a review of existing expert reports (unpublished; written by the Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute (BAW)), it was possible to compile a list of all known areas where ochre clogging damage had occurred. In this study, the current instances of damage could only be localised within the area of the Ems estuary north of Herbrum and in the area of the Weser estuary near Neuenkirchen. As a result, the following two study areas were defined for the investigations described: one at the Ems estuary and one at the Weser estuary.

2.1. Study Area: Ems Estuary

The study area was located within the larger hydrogeological area of the north and central German unconsolidated aquifer and the sub-area of the Hunte-Leda Moor Lowlands [17]. The sandy upper unconsolidated aquifer of the Moor Lowlands has high permeability and is characterised by siliceous or siliceous/organogenic rock. The study area was locally limited to the area of the Ems estuary between Herbrum and Papenburg (see Figure 2). Revetment damage was mainly found in the area of Rhede (Ems). The Ems estuary was subjected to a strong tidal range of 3.35 m (Mn) at the Rhede (Ems) gauge in the period of 2013–2022 [18]. The mean water levels in the Ems estuary at the Rhede (Ems) gauge for the same period are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Study Area: Weser Estuary

The study area was located within the larger hydrogeological area of the north and central German unconsolidated aquifer and the sub-area of the Lower Weser Marshes [17]. The sandy upper unconsolidated aquifer of the Lower Weser Marshes has high permeability and is considered saline. The rock is siliceous, siliceous/carbonate, or siliceous/organic. The study area was locally limited to the area between Bremen and Brake (Unterweser) (see Figure 2). Revetment damages were mainly found near Neuenkirchen (Schwanewede). The Weser estuary was characterised by a strong tidal range of 3.91 m (Mn) at the Elsfleth gauge in the period of 2013–2022 [20]. The mean water levels of the Weser estuary at the Elsfleth gauge for the same period are also shown in Table 1.

2.3. Research Programme

In order to investigate the chemical (abiotic) and (micro)biological parameters, as well as the hydraulic and structural boundary conditions, in ochre-clogged revetments, extensive data sampling was necessary. The characteristics of the groundwater (GW) and river water (RW) were determined through quarterly sampling over a period of one year. In addition, the relevant revetment components, i.e., the ochre-clogged filters and the riverbank material, where the armour layer was already damaged, were removed and analysed. Other external data were used to complete the data. Table 2 gives a detailed overview of the research programme.
Incubation experiments were carried out with some geotextile samples to determine the proportion of biological iron oxidation. For this purpose, sodium azide (NaN3) was added to parts of the geotextile samples to inhibit the activity of the iron-oxidising bacteria. Other parts were spiked with hydrochloric acid (HCl) to stop both biological and chemical iron oxidation. The proportion of biological and chemical oxidation could have been determined by comparing the Fe2+ concentration at different times. The results were insufficient, and no further description of the incubation experiments is therefore provided.

2.4. Groundwater Investigations

Groundwater measurement stations from previous evidence conservation measures were existent in the study areas. Prior to the sampling campaign, the measurement stations were thoroughly flushed with river water. Pump samples were taken during the sampling. Comparable flow conditions were always considered, i.e., exfiltration conditions were always present, and the groundwater flowed into the river water. Accordingly, the samples were always taken when the water level was low. At two measurement stations (GW2-E and GW1.2-W), continuous pumping was not possible, so qualified samples were taken after multiple flushes (≥5 times) of the water column. Groundwater sampling was carried out by certified samplers. The sampling dates are shown in Table 3. All groundwater analyses were performed according to the national (German) and European standards. The pH value, dissolved oxygen (DO), redox potential (EH), temperature, electrical conductivity (EC) and dissolved iron (Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions) were determined directly onsite (see Figure 3a). For the determination of the other parameters, the samples were preserved according to the aforementioned standards and analysed in the laboratory.

2.5. River Water Investigations

The river water samples were taken as random samples in the main stream at low tide. The pH, DO, temperature, EC, Fe2+ ions, and Fe3+ ions were determined directly onsite. As in the case of the groundwater investigations, the samples were preserved according to the standards for the determination of the other parameters and analysed in the laboratory. The sampling data corresponded to those of the groundwater analyses (Table 3).

2.6. Aquifer Material Sampling

The aquifer material (or riverbank subsoil) could only be sampled at low tide. First, the filter layer was removed (see below). This was performed with extreme care to ensure that the contact layer between the filter and the aquifer material remained intact. Various undisturbed samples were then taken to carry out the analyses listed in Table 2 (see Figure 3b). Some samples were immersed in epoxy resin to produce a 30-micron polished section.
The particle size distribution was determined according to DIN EN ISO 17892-4 [21]. To determine the kT,10 °C value, undisturbed samples were used in accordance with DIN EN ISO 17892-11 [22]. For the determination of the loss on ignition according to DIN EN 17685-1 [23], the samples were annealed at 550 °C to a constant mass. The iron and manganese contents were determined in an accredited laboratory via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) according to DIN EN ISO 17294-2 [24]. The samples were prepared via aqua regia digestion. Electron microscopic observations (see Figure 3c) and high-spatial-resolution chemical analyses were performed on a JEOL 6510-LA scanning electron microscope (SEM; Akishima, Japan) equipped with a tungsten filament (20 kV acceleration voltage). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS) was performed with the same settings, using the internal JEOL software “Analysis Station” (version 4, 13, 0, 79).

2.7. Granular Filter Sampling

The methods used to determine the geotechnical and filter parameters of the granular filter were similar to those used for the aquifer material. Only the sampling itself was different, as undisturbed sampling was not applicable due to the grain size of the granular filter.

2.8. Geotextile Filter Sampling

The geotextile filter samples were taken at the same time as the granular samples. Organic and inorganic adhesions were initially not removed, in order to obtain almost undisturbed samples. Some of the samples were then prepared in the laboratory, so that half of the samples were labelled as undisturbed and half as disturbed. The disturbed samples were prepared in several steps. The aim was to remove mobile particles from the textiles. First, they were dried at 45 °C and then carefully vacuumed and saturated in a heat bath (45 °C). The samples were then dried again, vacuumed, and treated briefly (2 min) in an ultrasonic bath. They were then dried and vacuumed again. The samples were then prepared for the required analyses via punching. Some samples were immersed in epoxy resin to produce a 30-micron polished section.
The permeability or velocity index was determined according to ASTM D 5887 [25] and DIN EN ISO 11058 [26]. For the determination of the loss on ignition, the sample was annealed until the mass was constant (see above). The mass per unit area was determined in parallel with all geotextile analyses according to DIN EN ISO 9864 [27]. The iron and manganese contents were also determined via ICP–MS (see above). The samples were prepared via aqua regia digestion. Microwave-assisted digestion was used for selected highly loaded, undisturbed samples. The methods adopted for the electron microscopic observations and EDXS were the same as described above.
For DNA extraction, the textile samples were cut into small fragments using sterile scissors, and the total genomic DNA was extracted using the Qiagen DNA Power Soil Pro Kit (Venlo, The Netherlands), following the manufacturer’s instructions, with some adjustments. Specifically, 25 μL of proteinase K (22 mg/mL) and 10 μL of RNase were added, and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. The gene for the 16S rRNA, a common phylogenetic marker for archaea/bacteria, was amplified using primer pairs 515F-Y (5′-GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGGTAA) and 926R (5′-CCGYCAATTYMTTTRAGTTT), targeting the hypervariable regions V4 and V5, as described by Parada et al. [28]. Subsequently, library preparation, sequencing, and data analysis were performed by Microsynth AG (Balgach, Switzerland). The PCR products were sequenced using a v2 500 cycle kit on the Illumina MiSeq platform (San Diego, CA, USA). Further bioinformatic analysis was performed as described by Bakenhus et al. [29].

3. Results

3.1. Examination of River Water and Groundwater

Table 4 shows the differences in the water level during the groundwater sampling. Positive values indicate the exfiltration of the groundwater into the river water, and negative values indicate infiltration. The problems associated with ochre clogging, including damage to the armour layer, occur mainly when exfiltration occurs and the groundwater flows into the estuary at low water levels. A maximum difference in the water level of 1.19 m was recorded for the gauges along the Ems estuary during the study period. In the Weser estuary, a maximum difference in the water level of 2.37 m was recorded during the sampling period. Taking into account the mean water levels in the study areas (Table 1) and the mean position of the groundwater surface in the vicinity of the study areas at the Ems and Weser estuaries, a mean water level difference according to the EAU (2020) [30] can be roughly determined. The following approximation can be used:
Difference   in   water   level   ( BS P ) :   Δ h w = a + 0.30   m + d
  • a: 0.5 × (hMHW−hMLW);
  • d: hMLW−hMLWS;
  • hMHW: mean high water level;
  • hMLW: mean low water level;
  • hMLWS: mean low water spring tide level.
The position of the groundwater surface can be specified as hGW,mean(E) = 0.89 m a.s.l. [31] near the Ems estuary (E) and hGW,mean(W) = 1.67 m a.s.l. [32] near the Weser estuary (W) for the time series of 2013–2022. Accordingly, the mean difference in the water level according to Equation (1) in the study area at the Ems estuary (E) for ΔhW(E) = 2.11 m and that for the area at the Weser estuary (W) for ΔhW(W) = 2.38 m.
Table 5 shows the summarised results of the river water and groundwater investigations. In their theoretical preliminary study, Tophoff et al. [9] described relevant limit values for the decisive ochre clogging parameters (DOCP) of the groundwater, namely, the concentration of Fe2+ ions (>0.2 mg/L), DO (<0.7 mg/L), redox potential EH (<0 mV), and rH value (<17). When comparing the limit values with the actual values of the groundwater behind the revetment, it is noticeable that the parameters do not fully match at the measurement stations where the ochre formation actually occurred. In particular, the DO is not below the limit at any of the measurement stations and the redox potential is not consistently less than or equal to 0.
The amplicon sequencing results for the groundwater sample are shown in Figure 4a. The figure lists all genera with a relative abundance > 1% and shows a highly diverse range of bacteria.

3.2. Examination of Revetment Components

Mainly, the aquifer material and filter materials were considered in the analysis of the revetment components. The armour layer itself was only considered in terms of the design and mass per unit area. Table 6 provides an overview of the revetment components investigated.

3.3. Aquifer Material

The filter parameters of the aquifer material are given in Table 7. They were comparable within each study area, so they are summarised in part for each study area. Uniform sands (Sa) were found in both areas. The iron and manganese contents varied greatly depending on the sampling point. These values are given in Table 7. The amounts of both iron and manganese were higher in the aquifer material of the Ems estuary than in that of the Weser estuary.
Figure 5a shows an undisturbed sample of the Ems aquifer material at sampling point E1. Black-brown structures can be seen, particularly in the contact zone with the geotextile (upper area). Further down, several brownish-coated grains are visible. Electron microscopy (EDXS) found that these structures were high in Si, Fe, and Mn relative to the grain particles.

3.4. Granular Filter

A granular filter was found exclusively in the Weser estuary (W1; see Figure 5b). The filter sample showed a very heterogeneous, slightly silty, sandy gravel (Gr, sa, si), with a grain size distribution of <0.063–63 mm. The coefficient of uniformity Cu was 61.1. High hydraulic conductivity (kT,10 °C value) of 7.0 × 10−2 m/s was empirically determined according to the method of Seiler [33]. The loss on ignition (LOI) of the granular filter material was 1.9%. The iron and manganese content could not be determined representatively due to the sizes of the individual grains and the maximum permissible digestion quantity.

3.5. Geotextile Filter

Table 8 summarises the material and filter parameters of the geotextile filters. The table shows various parameters for the unloaded (virgin) and loaded (disturbed and undisturbed) samples. The same textiles were used in E2 and E3. All textiles, A, B, and C, were composites consisting of a filter layer (FL) to fulfil the filter function and an additional layer (AL) to increase the frictional resistance on the aquifer material (see Figure 5c). It was clear that the loaded (undisturbed) samples weighed up to 4.3 times more than the virgin geotextiles due to the accumulations and adhesions. The loaded (disturbed) samples also had up to two times larger mass per unit area. The hydraulic conductivity (VIH50 and k value) decreased significantly. The reduction in hydraulic conductivity is shown in Table 8 as the residual permeability relative to the virgin (or unloaded) k value. The LOIs decreased to varying degrees, indicating that significant inorganic inclusions were present in the textiles. The iron and manganese contents of the geotextile filters also varied. It was clear that the iron and manganese contents in the textiles from the Ems estuary were significantly higher than in those from the Weser estuary.
Figure 5. Revetment components. (a) An undisturbed sample (polished section) of the aquifer material (E1) at 250× magnification. The upper area shows the contact zone with the geotextile. (b) The granular filter before sampling (W1). (c) An undisturbed geotextile sample before preparation (W2).
Figure 5. Revetment components. (a) An undisturbed sample (polished section) of the aquifer material (E1) at 250× magnification. The upper area shows the contact zone with the geotextile. (b) The granular filter before sampling (W1). (c) An undisturbed geotextile sample before preparation (W2).
Water 16 01840 g005
Figure 6 shows details of the geotextiles after sampling and preparation, magnified up to 100 times. It is clear that the disturbed samples (see Figure 6a,d), from which the mobile particles have been largely removed, show significantly fewer adhesions than the undisturbed samples (see Figure 6b,c,e,f). The filter layers have considerably thinner filaments (30–40 µm) than the additional layer (120–150 µm). Figure 6c,e show that many granular particles are trapped in the geotextile structure. It can be assumed that the filter layer of the undisturbed geotextile W2 (see Figure 6f) is less clogged than the filter layer of the undisturbed geotextile E1 (see Figure 6c). EDXS investigations were carried out to determine the (chemical) compositions of the deposits and adhesions. Representative extracts of the results are shown in Figure 7. EDXS showed that the structures partially enveloping the filaments contained mainly C, O, Si, Fe, and Mn. Traces of Al, P, K, and Ca were also found. The elemental distributions of the samples (E1: see Figure 7a;W2: see Figure 7b) were comparable, but there were some differences. Mn was not found in W2, while the amount of Al detected was higher in W2 than in E1. The amount of Fe detected was higher in E1 than in W2. Figure 8 shows an elemental distribution image, or SEM–EDXS mapping, of an undisturbed sample from E1. Here, the distribution of the elements Al, C, Fe, Mn, O, and Si is shown with the additional SEM image. Again, the transition from the filter layer to the additional layer is shown. It can be seen that the adhesion is composed of different elements (including Al, Fe, Mn, O, and Si). A trapped quartz particle (<0.1 mm) can be seen at the centre of the image.
The microbiological examination revealed iron oxide particles (approximately 5 μm) with attached microbial cells. In addition, individual bacterial cells (approximately 1 μm) and isolated diatoms (approximately 20 μm) were always present in these samples. The amplicon sequencing results (see Figure 4b) showed a large proportion of prokaryotes (bacteria and archaea) of low abundance below 1% for both the Weser (W2) and Ems (E3) geotextiles. Additionally, the Weser geotextile contained a large proportion of genera with no cultured representatives. The reliability of the amplicon sequencing was confirmed by the consistent results obtained in the sequence analysis of 12 replicates from the Weser geotextile.

4. Discussion

As a preliminary note, it should be mentioned that the complicated sampling and highly resource-demanding microbiological analysis did not permit an increased number of tests. The results are therefore subject to statistical uncertainty.

4.1. Environmental Conditions of Filters

The environmental conditions surrounding the filters, particularly the geotextile filters, were derived through the mentioned investigations of the groundwater, river water, and aquifer material.

4.2. River Water

As expected, the surface water of both estuaries was highly oxic (DO > 9 mg/L). Accordingly, no dissolved iron or manganese ions were present. In the surface water of the Ems (RW-E), high levels of ferric precipitates were found (Fetot = 38.3 ± 22.3 mg/L). The values were significantly lower in the surface water of the Weser (RW-W; Fetot = 0.5 ± 0.7 mg/L). Manganese precipitates were found in the RW-E (Mntot = 1.7 ± 0.8 mg/L), whereas no precipitates were found in the RW-W. This could have been due to the high suspended sediment concentration of up to 30 kg/m3 [34] in the Lower Ems near Rhede (Ems). Precipitated oxides and/or hydroxides can adhere to suspended sediments. At the same time, suspended sediments can also accumulate in the geotextile filters and increase the reduction in the permeability [35]. In summary, it can be concluded that sufficient oxygen can be provided in the surface water for oxidation. However, the reaction is much faster under aerobic conditions than under submerged conditions [36]. Other quality parameters are not relevant to the ochre reaction and can be neglected when assessing the tendency for ochre formation. It is also important to monitor the water levels and tidal range to determine differences in the water levels (see below).

4.3. Groundwater

The groundwater investigations showed that reducing groundwater was found in the areas where damage had occurred as a result of ochre-clogged geotextiles. For example, weakly reducing groundwater (as defined by Hoelting and Coldewey [37]) was found at measurement station GW2-E and at all measurement stations along the Weser estuary. The high oxygen concentrations of DO = 0.9–5.2 mg/L are remarkable. This can be explained by the fact that the groundwater and surface water in the revetment are in constant exchange due to the tides. The fact that there is still sufficient dissolved iron and manganese available for the ochre formation reaction indicates very high initial concentrations of Fe2+ and Mn2+ ions (Table 5). The half-life times (see [3]) for chemical iron oxidation over the arithmetic mean of all sampling points are approximately 14 min (min: 0.5 min; max: 180 min). These times are sufficient for chemical oxidation during the low water phase. Considering the formation characteristics of iron and manganese oxides and hydroxides (iron: EH value of approximately 0 to 500 mV, manganese: EH value of approximately 600 to 1200 mV [10]), iron oxidation can be chemically induced, as the “real” redox potential in the filter will be between that of the river water (EH ≈ 220 mV) and groundwater (EH ≈ −10 to 170 mV). Chemical manganese oxidation is not likely, as oxidation generally requires redox potential EH ≥ 600 mV. However, as the manganese levels were measured in the textile, these may have been precipitated by microbial processes (see below). Measurement station GW1-E showed indifferent conditions; no dissolved iron and no dissolved manganese could be found, so it can be assumed that oxidising conditions prevailed.
The groundwater microbiome revealed a certain abundance of the genera Gallionella and Curvibacter (see Figure 4). The bacteria of the genus Gallionella are well-known iron oxidisers [38]. The members of the genus Curvibacter are also iron-oxidising bacteria and typically occur where iron-rich, oxygen-poor groundwater enters an oxygen-rich environment [39]. As such conditions were found in the vicinity of the Weser estuary, it is feasible that the ochre formation was favoured by microbial influences.
The monitoring of the water levels and tidal range is also relevant for the determination of water level differences (see below).

4.4. Aquifer Material

Veldhuijzen Van Zanten and Thabet [7], in their investigations of ochre-clogged revetment samples, found that changes in the permeability of the aquifer material were largely limited to the upper 5 mm. This observation was also made by Tophoff et al. [3] in an experimental study. In the Ems aquifer material (E1, see Figure 5a), it was also found that only the contact zone with the geotextile had high iron and manganese content (Table 7). Based on the original mass, these values were approximately 0.2–3% for iron and approximately 0.02–0.1% for manganese, which appears to be comparable with the natural content. A direct comparison with natural sand could not be made. The hydraulic conductivity (kT,10 °C value) of the aquifer material beneath the ochre-clogged geotextiles was approximately 10 to 1000 times higher than that of the textiles. In this respect, no relevant changes in the hydraulic performance of the aquifer material were expected due to the high permeability and the observation that the ochre formation occurred exclusively in the contact zone. In further investigations, the hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer material should always be considered, as all damage caused by ochre-clogged geotextiles occurs where sandy soils are found. However, medium- to low-permeability marsh soils are usually found on the riverbanks of the German North Sea estuaries [17]. The preliminary tests for the experimental studies by Tophoff et al. [3] also showed that ochre formation is faster when the subsoil material is more permeable. This is probably due to the greater availability of oxygen and the higher loads of Fe2+ or Mn2+ ions and biomass.

4.5. Armour Layer

In order to determine the armour layer weight required to prevent the ochre-clogged or impermeable geotextile filter from lifting the armour layer, the buoyancy design according to MAR (2008) [1] is useful. As the maximum difference in the water level can only occur at low tide and under atmospheric conditions, no buoyancy for the armour layer itself needs to be considered.
Weight   of   armour   layer :   G R = γ A × Δ h w × γ w cos β
  • γA: safety factor for buoyancy;
  • ΔhW: difference in water level (Equation (1));
  • γW: weight density of water;
  • β: slope angle.
With γA = 1.0, ΔhW(E) = 2.11 m or ΔhW(W) = 2.38 m, and β = 18.4° (inclination ratio 1:3), the required armour layer weight of 21.8 kN/m2 (E) or 24.6 kN/m2 (W) can be roughly determined. These values exceed the existing armour layer weights (Table 6) by a factor of up to 3.7 so that stability is no longer given, and the revetment can be uplifted as a consequence. According to the latest standards, permeable armour layers (riprap) should weigh at least 900 kg [1]. Another source gives a maximum weight of 907 kg (2000 pounds [40]). However, it would be uneconomical to design the armour layer based on the weight as it would need to be significantly higher. It should, nevertheless, be high enough to ensure that the geotextile filter rests firmly on the subsoil throughout its service life [41] so that the naturally formed filter cake on the underside of the geotextile is not destroyed. This can also form under a long-term cyclic flow [42].

4.6. Ochre Clogging in Granular Filters

The studies by Tophoff et al. [3] showed that no relevant permanent change in the permeability of granular filters due to iron ochre clogging under experimental conditions was measured.
The in situ samples in W1 revealed that the granular filter was highly permeable (kT,10 °C value) and that the total amount of organic substances (as determined by LOIs) was low. The hydraulic filter stability against the soil is ensured when kfilter > 25 × ksoil [33]. This was the case here (kfilter = 7.0 × 10−2 m/s; 25 × ksoil = 1.1 × 10−3 m/s), although many ochre-clogging products were visible (see Figure 5b). The service life of the filter and the iron and manganese content were unknown.
It is probable that a granular filter located in tidally influenced revetments generally does not experience a significant permanent reduction in permeability due to ochre clogging. A temporary reduction in permeability may be followed by local rearrangement, which could lead to an increase in the permeability to the original level (see also Weidner [5] and Tophoff et al. [3]).

4.7. Formation and Characteristics of Ochre-Clogging Products in Geotextile Filters

In their studies, Miszkowska et al. [43] showed that nonwoven geotextiles with an alternating flow are more likely to cause clogging than geotextiles with a unidirectional flow. The fines, in particular, play an important role [42]. The greater the total amount of fines in the filter environment, the faster the reduction in permeability due to physical clogging.
Palmeira et al. [44] observed that the ochre clogging was concentrated in the first few layers of the filaments. Abromeit [6] showed that the ochre-clogging products were attached to the underside of the geotextile. Microscopic examinations of the cross-sections of the undisturbed samples were used to determine where and how the ochre-clogging products were able to accumulate in the filter structure. The majority of the clogging products were concentrated in the first few layers of the geotextile filaments. In geotextile W2, most of the ochre-clogging products were attached to the underside of the filter layer (see Figure 5c). Only a few ochre-clogging products were attached to the filaments of the additional layer. The opposite was observed for geotextile E1. In these samples, most of the ochre-clogging products were found on the top side of the geotextile in the filter layer. Furthermore, the filaments of the additional layer showed more adhesions in E than in W. An explanation for this can be found by considering the mass per unit area and the resulting permeability. Due to the almost doubled amounts of accumulation and adhesion in the Ems textile compared to the Weser textile (and the very low permeability), it can be assumed that the underside of the geotextile was not exposed to oxygen for a particularly long time and showed completely anaerobic conditions. From these observations, it seems likely that the ochre-clogging products do not generally accumulate on the underside but in the first few filament layers, where sufficient oxygen is available. The enveloping ochre-clogging products (see the disturbed specimens in Figure 6a,d) were largely immobile because they could not be completely removed during the preparation process.
The extensive physicochemical investigations allowed a satisfactory analysis of the nature of the ochre-clogging products. As in the experimental investigations by Tophoff et al. [3], the ochre-clogging products consisted of oxides and/or hydroxides (in this case, iron and manganese oxides and/or hydroxides) and particles from the filter environment. In contrast to the experimental studies, the Ems and Weser samples showed, as expected, a significantly wider range of different elements (see Figure 7 for E and W; see Figure 8 for E). These included silicon, calcium, and aluminium, which occur naturally in phyllosilicates. The silt in the brackish water of the estuaries contains these phyllosilicates, which can then accumulate in the filter. Potassium also occurs naturally in the silt or in suspended matter in brackish water. Traces of phosphorus can originate from other marine silicate minerals, such as apatite.
The amplicon sequencing results showed that the microbial communities of the geotextile samples were different from those of the groundwater sample. The presence of certain types of nitrifying prokaryotes, such as Nitrospira and MDN1 of the Nitrosomonadaceae family, in the geotextile samples from the Weser and the Ems, respectively, suggests that ammonium is being oxidised to nitrate in these locations (see Figure 4). It is worth noting that there was no clear evidence of sulphate-reducing or sulphur-oxidising prokaryotes in either the Weser or Ems samples, despite the presence of sulphate due to marine influences. The comparison of the Weser samples (groundwater and geotextile) in Figure 4 shows no significant similarities. This is remarkable considering that the groundwater and the textile come into contact with each other during each tidal cycle. The filter seems to represent its own environment. The comparison of the microbiomes of the Ems and Weser geotextile samples reveals only the following four common genera (see Figure 4b): Nitrosarchaeum, UTCFX1 of the Anaerolinaceae family, Hyphomicrobium (<1%, therefore not shown in Figure 4b; see European Nucleotide Archive (ENA), project ID PRJEB76146), and Curvibacter (<1%). Of these, Hyphomicrobium is capable of oxidising manganese [45], and Curvibacter is able to oxidise iron [46]. Thus, it seems that macroscopically very similar phenomena (the ochre clogging of geotextiles) can be caused by different microbiomes, showing only minor overlaps. It can be assumed that the salt content (Cl and Na), which differs by a factor of 2.3 (RW-W and RW-E), is mainly responsible for the composition of the different microbiomes. However, even if the microbiomes are very different, they can be physiologically equivalent and may favour similar biogeochemical processes.
The chemical analysis of the textiles revealed that the textile samples from the Ems contained large quantities of manganese and iron oxides and/or hydroxides (Table 8). Parts of it may have been oxidised as a result of biological processes. This finding indicates that the revetment damages observed can be increased by the activity of different microorganisms. It was not possible to quantify the microbiological contribution to ochre formation in this study.
Thus, the process of ochre clogging in the Ems and Weser estuaries seems to be a biogeochemical clogging process. This refers to the combined action of the chemical precipitation of iron and manganese and precipitation by microorganisms. Physical clogging due to the accumulation of particles from the filter environment in the geotextile filter seems to be favoured by ochre formation, as the pore volume is reduced by adhesions. According to the authors, the reaction rates for chemical clogging (see [3]) and other models describing the permeability of geotextiles (e.g., [15,47]) cannot be used in isolation because they do not consider the combined biogeochemical and physical clogging process.

4.8. Application of Geotextile Filters in the Case of Ochre Clogging Tendency

A model to estimate the accumulation of ochre products in a geotextile filter over time is not possible with the available results. However, the effect of ochre clogging on the service lives of geotextile filters can be statistically estimated. Figure 9 summarises all the available data (logarithmic representation) on the reduction in the permeability of ochre-clogged filters. In order to harmonise the values, the residual permeability of each geotextile was calculated. The experimental data describe the chemical iron precipitation and show that the residual permeability is still 59% after approximately 0.5 years. Investigations by the BAW in 1993 [35] and 1998 [48] showed residual permeability of 0.31% after 5 years, 0.54% after 9 years, and 0.8% after 11 years at different sampling locations. The current sampling campaign showed residual permeability of 0.03% to 0.05% after 35 to 39 years at different sampling points. A “mean” was formed using a non-linear regression analysis to describe the reduction in filter permeability over time. The assumption that the residual permeability is non-linear is described in detail in Tophoff et al. [3]. This is supported by the hypothesis that the iron and manganese loads, as well as the biomass, are significantly involved in the ochre formation (see above). As the permeability of the textile decreases and the influent loads are reduced, the rate of permeability reduction is also reduced. To determine the upper and lower bounds, the chemical reaction rate was factorised using the extreme values of the groundwater quality and oxygen availability.
Further research is required to provide a quantifiable estimation of the combined biogeochemical and physical clogging process, but at present, crucial indications for the optimum design of the geotextile filter can be described. Limit values for the susceptibility to ochre clogging of geosynthetic filters in tidally influenced revetments have so far been established by Tophoff et al. [9]. Taking the in situ investigations into account, the limit values for the groundwater quality need to be updated. The redox potential (EH) and dissolved oxygen (DO) are no longer considered in isolation, as these limits were clearly exceeded at the damaged sites. Both parameters influence the rH value, whose limit value (rH > 17) was confirmed by the sampling. The limit value for the concentration of iron (Fe2+ ions < 0.2 mg/L) was also confirmed. Additionally, the manganese content (Mn2+ ions) has to be considered with the same limit value of <0.2 mg/L. If these limits are complied with, a state-of-the-art filter design can be obtained. If these limits are not complied with, an adapted state-of-the-art filter design that can reduce the damage caused by ochre clogging can be proposed, as below.
Palmeira [49] summarises various studies on the behaviour of geotextile filters under severe and critical conditions and measures to minimise failures. He describes that nonwoven needle-punched geotextiles appear to be less susceptible to clogging than heat-bonded or woven geotextiles. This means that nonwoven, non-heat-bonded geotextiles should be used where there is a risk of clogging. Tophoff et al. [3] recommend selecting the maximum allowable characteristic opening size when designing filters with a risk of iron precipitation. Other studies support this recommendation, although the opening size is not directly related to the clogging potential ([47,50] according to [51]). Heibaum [51] recommends the use of the permeability criterion kgeotextile ≥ 100 × ksoil according to Rüegger and Hufenus [52] when intense clogging is expected. This recommendation is supported by Tophoff et al. [3] and Palmeira [49]. As ochre clogging can favour physical clogging due to the associated reduction in pore space, other non-clogging criteria should also be considered when designing filters. Giroud [53] and the USBR [41] suggest that the number of constrictions should be between 25 and 40. As Tophoff et al. [3] recommend a smaller inner surface area in the case of possible iron precipitation, the number of constrictions should be as low as possible within the scope of the state-of-the-art filter design, as this is related to the mass per unit area and the layer thickness of the geotextile and thus the inner surface area [54]. Tophoff et al. [3] also recommend selecting a geotextile constructed from a mixture of materials with hydrophilic behaviour. Thus, an additional layer with a large inner surface area on the top side of the geotextile could slow down the negative effects of ochre clogging due to the decreased oxygen availability in the filter layer [14]. The weight of the revetment should be as high as possible within an economical framework. Figure 10 summarises the adapted filter design by proposing a procedure for filter design if ochre clogging is likely. It should be emphasised that these suggestions only apply to geotextiles that meet the other requirements for hydraulic filter materials. According to Heibaum [51], criteria relating to geometric and hydraulic properties, resistance to clogging, and survivability must be fulfilled. This applies to selected nonwovens with a mass per unit area of 500 g/m2 or more. National regulations and guidelines are to be considered.

5. Conclusions and Prospects

Extensive theoretical and in situ investigations were carried out to better understand the environmental conditions surrounding granular and geotextile filters in estuaries in the case of ochre clogging. Physical, chemical, and biological tests were therefore carried out to analyse the filter and the surrounding environmental conditions in detail. The main aim was to improve the knowledge of the ochre clogging process under in situ conditions in geotextile filters.
Our research shows that ochre formation in the Ems and Weser estuaries is favoured by microbiological influences. The geotextiles receive organic material through the groundwater in limited quantities but at high concentrations. This can lead to the growth of a biofilm in the geotextile, which further compounds the reduction in permeability caused by chemical and mechanical processes.. Therefore, the process appears to be a biogeochemical clogging process, i.e., the combined action of the chemical precipitation of iron and manganese and precipitation by microorganisms. The filter itself seems to be a self-contained microbiological environment. The precipitates appear to be largely immobile and accumulate in the first few filament layers, where sufficient oxygen is available, and reduce the pore volume of the filter. These ochre-clogging products envelop the filaments until the permeability of the geotextile filter is very strongly reduced. In the Ems estuary, for example, the residual permeability of the geotextile filter after a service life of 35 to 39 years is between 0.05 and 0.001%, and it is therefore almost impermeable.
According to the current state of research, physical clogging in the geotextile filter is favoured by ochre formation. Fine particles, which would be passable in their original state, can thus clog the filter structure as deposits in the ochre-clogging products.
Based on the preliminary studies and the current study, measures were developed to minimise the problems of reduced filter performance due to ochre clogging. An assessment of the tendency for ochre formation is essential for this. For the first time, limit values for the groundwater quality were established to quantify the ochre clogging tendency. In order to maximise the service life of the geotextile filter in the event of ochre clogging, recommendations for an adapted state-of-the-art filter design have been developed as a guide for planners.
A quantifiable and generally valid assessment of the reduction in filter permeability as a result of the combined biochemical clogging process could not yet be derived from the research results obtained. Nevertheless, we have been successful in describing the bio-geochemical conditions of the filter environment almost completely, although the results are subject to statistical uncertainty because only a limited number of tests were possible. The authors see a need for further research in this area. Adapted geotextiles and filter constructions should be investigated under experimental and in situ conditions. Therefore, further accelerated experimental studies are recommended. The in situ investigations should cover periods of 1, 5, and 10 years. The aim of both investigations is to gain further knowledge and to validate or recalibrate the described model for estimating the service life of geotextile filters in case of ochre clogging tendency.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, L.T.; data curation, L.T. and Y.A.; funding acquisition, L.T. and F.H.; investigation, L.T., C.V. and Y.A.; methodology, L.T., B.P. and Y.A.; project administration, L.T.; resources, H.S. and F.H.; supervision, H.S. and F.H.; validation, Y.A.; visualisation, L.T.; writing—original draft, L.T.; writing—review and editing, H.S., F.H., C.V., B.P. and Y.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by BAW (funding number 73952040021020).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Raw data from the microbiological investigations were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) database and were assigned the Project ID PRJEB76146.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute (BAW), particularly Jan Kayser, Oliver Stelzer, and Norbert Kunz, for their very constructive cooperation and technical and methodological advice. We would also like to thank Helen Ewald, from the University of Münster, Institute of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, for her valuable technical assistance during the sampling.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute. BAWMerkblatt Anwendung von Regelbauweisen für Böschungs- und Sohlensicherungen an Binnenwasserstraßen (MAR); Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute: Karlsruhe, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  2. German Coastal Engineering Research Council. Die Küste, Heft 88, EAK 2002, Empfehlungen für Küstenschutzwerke, 3. Korrigierte Ausgabe 2020; German Coastal Engineering Research Council, Ed.; German Coastal Engineering Research Council: Hamburg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tophoff, L.; Finklenburg, B.; Schriewer, E.-L.; Schüttrumpf, H.; Heimbecher, F. Assessment of the functionality of geotextile and granular filter systems in hydraulic engineering in case of iron ochre clogging tendency. Geotext. Geomembr. 2024, 52, 465–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Correia, L.; Ehrlich, M.; Mendonca, M.B.; Keim, C.N. Laboratory studies on ochre formation and removal from geotextile filters. Can. Geotech. J. 2023, 60, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Weidner, C. Experimental Modelling and Prevention of Chemical Fe-Clogging in Deep Vertical Wells for Open-Pit Dewatering. Ph.D. Thesis, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Abromeit, H.-U. Revetment damage as a result of geotextile colmation by flocculated ochreous products and possible repair methods. In Proceedings of the ICG 7, Geosynthetics International Conference, Nice, France, 22–27 September 2002; pp. 1085–1088. [Google Scholar]
  7. van Veldhuijzen Zanten, R.; Thabet, R. Investigation on long-Term Behavior of Geotextiles in Bank Protection Works. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Geotextiles, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 1–6 August 1982. [Google Scholar]
  8. Weidner, C.; Henkel, S.; Lorke, S.; Rüde, T.R.; Schüttrumpf, H.; Klauder, W. Experimental Modelling of Chemical Clogging Processes in Dewatering Wells. Mine Water Environ. 2012, 31, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tophoff, L.; Kreyenschulte, M.; Schüttrumpf, H.; Heimbecher, F. Ochre clogging of hydraulic engineering filter systems: State of the science and necessary investigations. Grund. Z. Fachsekt. Hydrogeol. 2022, 27, 295–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Houben, G.; Treskatis, C. Regenerierung und Sanierung von Brunnen: Technische und Naturwissenschaftliche Grundlagen der Brunnenalterung und Möglicher Gegenmaßnahmen, 3rd ed.; Vulkan-Verlag: Essen, Germany, 2020; ISBN 3835673882. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kuntze, H. Verockerungen: Diagnose und Therapie; Nach KWK-Versuchen 1956–1976; Parey: Hamburg, Germany, 1978; ISBN 9783490032973. [Google Scholar]
  12. Szewzyk, U.; Szewzyk, R.; Schmidt, B.; Braun, B. Neutrophilic Iron-Depositing Microorganisms. In Biofilm Highlights; Flemming, H.-C., Wingender, J., Szewzyk, U., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 63–79. ISBN 978-3-642-19939-4. [Google Scholar]
  13. de Mendonca, M.B.; Ehrlich, M.; Cammarota, M.C. Conditioning factors of iron ochre biofilm formation on geotextile filters. Can. Geotech. J. 2003, 40, 1225–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Di, F. Influence of polyurethane foam on chemical clogging of nonwoven geotextile and tailings caused by ferrous iron. Text. Res. J. 2021, 91, 1094–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cao, W.; Yan, G.; Hofmann, H.; Scheuermann, A. State of the Art on Fe Precipitation in Porous Media: Hydrogeochemical Processes and Evolving Parameters. JMSE 2024, 12, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute. BAWMerkblatt Anwendung von Geotextilen Filtern an Wasserstraßen (MAG); Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute: Karlsruhe, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  17. Elbracht, J.; Meyer, R.; Reutter, E. Hydrogeologische Räume und Teilräume in Niedersachsen, 3rd ed.; Landesamt für Bergbau, Energie und Geologie: Hannover, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Federal Waterways and Shipping Administration. Wasserstandsdaten für den Pegel Rhede (Ems) Zwischen den Jahren 2013 bis 2022; Measurement Stations: DEK-km 217.86: Meppen, Germany, 2024; Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  19. Niedersachsen. Übersichtskarte Niedersachsen. Available online: www.niedersachsen.de (accessed on 4 June 2024).
  20. Federal Waterways and Shipping Administration. Wasserstandsdaten für den Pegel Elsfleth (Weser) Zwischen den Jahren 2013 bis 2022; Measurement Stations: Weser-km 33.33: Bremen, Germany, 2023; Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  21. DIN EN ISO 17892-4:2017-04; Geotechnische Erkundung und Untersuchung -Laborversuche an Bodenproben -Teil 4: Bestimmung der Korngrößenverteilung (ISO 17892-4:2016); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 17892-4:2016. Beuth Verlag GmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2016.
  22. DIN EN ISO 17892-11:2021-03; Geotechnische Erkundung und Untersuchung -Laborversuche an Bodenproben -Teil 11: Bestimmung der Wasserdurchlässigkeit (ISO 17892-11:2019); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 17892-11:2019. Beuth Verlag GmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2019.
  23. DIN EN 17685-1:2023-04; Erdarbeiten -Chemische Prüfverfahren -Teil 1: Bestimmung des Glühverlusts; Deutsche Fassung EN 17685-1:2023. Beuth Verlag GmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2023.
  24. DIN EN ISO 17294-2:2017-01; Wasserbeschaffenheit -Anwendung der Induktiv Gekoppelten Plasma-Massenspektrometrie (ICP-MS) -Teil 2: Bestimmung von Ausgewählten Elementen Einschließlich Uran-Isotope (ISO 17294-2:2016); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 17294-2:2016. Beuth Verlag GmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2016.
  25. ASTM D 5887; Test Method for Measurement of Index Flux through Saturated Geosynthetic Clay Liner Specimens Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016.
  26. DIN EN ISO 11058:2019-09; Geotextilien und Geotextilverwandte Produkte -Bestimmung der Wasserdurchlässigkeit normal zur Ebene, ohne Auflast (ISO 11058:2019); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 11058:2019. Beuth Verlag GmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2019.
  27. DIN EN ISO 9864:2005-05; Geokunststoffe -Prüfverfahren zur Bestimmung der Flächenbezogenen Masse von Geotextilien und Geotextilverwandten Produkten (ISO 9864:2005); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 9864:2005. Beuth Verlag GmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2005.
  28. Parada, A.E.; Needham, D.M.; Fuhrman, J.A. Every base matters: Assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 1403–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bakenhus, I.; Jongsma, R.; Michler-Kozma, D.; Hölscher, L.; Gabel, F.; Holert, J.; Philipp, B. A domesticated photoautotrophic microbial community as a biofilm model system for analyzing the influence of plastic surfaces on invertebrate grazers in limnic environments. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1238913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. The Committee for Waterfront Structures of the German Port Technology Association and the German Geotechnical Society. Recommendations of the Committee for Waterfront Structures Harbours and Waterways: EAU 2020, 10th ed.; Wilhelm Ernst & Sohn Verlag fur Architektur und Technische: Newark, NJ, USA, 2024; ISBN 978-3-433-03392-0. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lower Saxony Water Management, Coastal and Nature Protection Agency. Grundwasserstandsdaten der Gütemessstellen 101 Aschendorf und 247 Borsumer Berge I im Zeitraum 2013–2022; Measurement Stations: Rhede (Ems), Meppen, Germany, 2023; Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lower Saxony Water Management, Coastal and Nature Protection Agency. Grundwasserstandsdaten der Gütemessstelle UWO 164 N 19 Neuenkirchen im Zeitraum 2013–2022; Measurement Stations: Neuenkirchen (Weser), Bremen, Germany, 2023; Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  33. Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute. BAWMerkblatt Anwendung von Kornfiltern an Bundeswasserstraßen (MAK); Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute: Karlsruhe, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  34. Talke, S.A.; de Swart, H.E.; Schuttelaars, H.M. Feedback between residual circulations and sediment distribution in highly turbid estuaries: An analytical model. Cont. Shelf Res. 2009, 29, 119–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute. Gutachten zu Schäden und Instandsetzungsmaßnahmen an den Deckwerken der Oberen Tideems; BAW-Nr. 93 51 3574; Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute: Karlsruhe, Germany, 1993; Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  36. Correia, L.; Ehrlich, M.; Mendonca, M. The effect of submersion in the ochre formation in geotextile filters. Geotext. Geomembr. 2017, 45, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hölting, B.; Coldewey, W.G. Hydrogeologie; Spektrum Akademischer Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; ISBN 978-3-8274-2353-5. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hanert, H.H. The Genus Gallionella. In The Prokaryotes; Dworkin, M., Falkow, S., Rosenberg, E., Schleifer, K.-H., Stackebrandt, E., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 990–995. ISBN 978-0-387-25497-5. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hallbeck, L.; Pedersen, K. The Family Gallionellaceae. In The Prokaryotes; Rosenberg, E., DeLong, E.F., Lory, S., Stackebrandt, E., Thompson, F., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 853–858. ISBN 978-3-642-30196-4. [Google Scholar]
  40. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. Chapter 7: Riprap Slope Protection: DS-13(7)-2.1. In Design Standards No. 13, Embankment Dams; The United States Bureau of Reclamation: Washington, DC, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  41. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. Chapter 19: Geotextiles: DS-13(19)-1. In Design Standards No. 13, Embankment Dams; The United States Bureau of Reclamation: Washington, DC, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  42. Chen, R.-H.; Ho, C.-C.; Chung, W.-B. The filtration mechanism and micro-observation of soil-geotextile systems under cyclic flows. J. GeoEng. 2008, 3, 101–112. [Google Scholar]
  43. Miszkowska, A.; Lenart, S.; Koda, E. Changes of Permeability of Nonwoven Geotextiles due to Clogging and Cyclic Water Flow in Laboratory Conditions. Water 2017, 9, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Palmeira, E.M.; Remigio, A.F.; Ramos, M.L.; Bernardes, R.S. A study on biological clogging of nonwoven geotextiles under leachate flow. Geotext. Geomembr. 2008, 26, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Northup, D.E.; Barns, S.M.; Yu, L.E.; Spilde, M.N.; Schelble, R.T.; Dano, K.E.; Crossey, L.J.; Connolly, C.A.; Boston, P.J.; Natvig, D.O.; et al. Diverse microbial communities inhabiting ferromanganese deposits in Lechuguilla and Spider Caves. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 5, 1071–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gülay, A.; Çekiç, Y.; Musovic, S.; Albrechtsen, H.-J.; Smets, B.F. Diversity of Iron Oxidizers in Groundwater-Fed Rapid Sand Filters: Evidence of Fe(II)-Dependent Growth by Curvibacter and Undibacterium spp. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Giroud, J.; Luettich, S.; Richardson, G.; Zhao, A. Permeability of geotextile and granular filters. In Proceedings of the ICG 7, Geosynthetics International Conference, Nice, France, 22–27 September 2002; pp. 1065–1068. [Google Scholar]
  48. Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute. Schlussbericht zur Sanierung der Schäden am Plattendeckwerk Neuenkirchen bei Unterweser-km 29,7 und 32,2; BAW-Nr. 92-21.5313; Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute: Karlsruhe, Germany, 1998; Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  49. Palmeira, E.M. Geotextile filters: From idealization to real behaviour (Giroud lecture). In Geosynthetics: Leading the Way to a Resilient Planet; Biondi, G., Cazzuffi, D., Moraci, N., Soccodato, C., Eds.; CRC Press: London, UK, 2023; pp. 3–45. ISBN 9781003386889. [Google Scholar]
  50. Shukla, S.K. (Ed.) Handbook of Geosynthetic Engineering: Geosynthetics and Their Applications, 2nd ed.; ICE Publishing: London, UK, 2012; ISBN 978-0-7277-4175-2. [Google Scholar]
  51. Heibaum, M. Geosynthetics for waterways and flood protection structures—Controlling the interaction of water and soil. Geotext. Geomembr. 2014, 42, 374–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rüegger, R.; Hufenus, R. (Eds.) Bauen mit Geokunststoffen: Ein Handbuch für den Geokunststoff-Anwender; SVG: St. Gallen, Switzerland, 2003; ISBN 3952277401. [Google Scholar]
  53. Giroud, J. Development of criteria for geotextiles and granular filters. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Guarujá, Brazil, 23–27 May 2010; pp. 45–64. [Google Scholar]
  54. Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute. BAWRichtlinie Prüfung von Geokunststoffen im Verkehrswasserbau (RPG); Federal Waterways Engineering and Research: Karlsruhe, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Locally damaged revetments. (a) Revetment with sandstones in the Ems estuary (E2), and (b) revetment with reinforced concrete slabs in the Weser estuary (W2); both sites are located in Northwest Germany).
Figure 1. Locally damaged revetments. (a) Revetment with sandstones in the Ems estuary (E2), and (b) revetment with reinforced concrete slabs in the Weser estuary (W2); both sites are located in Northwest Germany).
Water 16 01840 g001
Figure 2. Overview of the three major North Sea estuaries located in Northwest Germany and the study areas with measurement stations (extended map based on © Niedersachsen, www.niedersachsen.de [19], accessed on 4 June 2024).
Figure 2. Overview of the three major North Sea estuaries located in Northwest Germany and the study areas with measurement stations (extended map based on © Niedersachsen, www.niedersachsen.de [19], accessed on 4 June 2024).
Water 16 01840 g002
Figure 3. Experimental and sampling equipment. (a) Measuring probes of the multi-parameter portable metre WTW Multi 3630 IDS (Langenhagen, Germany), (b) sampling tubes at sampling point E1 after geotextile is removed, and (c) sample container of the JEOL 6510-LA scanning electron microscope.
Figure 3. Experimental and sampling equipment. (a) Measuring probes of the multi-parameter portable metre WTW Multi 3630 IDS (Langenhagen, Germany), (b) sampling tubes at sampling point E1 after geotextile is removed, and (c) sample container of the JEOL 6510-LA scanning electron microscope.
Water 16 01840 g003
Figure 4. Results of amplicon sequencing. (a) Groundwater sample (near W2), and (b) geotextiles W2 and E3; genera (families) of bacteria and archaea whose relative abundance was >1% are listed, and NA indicates sequences that did not allow phylogenetic assignment.
Figure 4. Results of amplicon sequencing. (a) Groundwater sample (near W2), and (b) geotextiles W2 and E3; genera (families) of bacteria and archaea whose relative abundance was >1% are listed, and NA indicates sequences that did not allow phylogenetic assignment.
Water 16 01840 g004
Figure 6. Geotextiles recorded using SEM after sampling. (a) Textile A (E1—disturbed), (b,c) textile A (E1—undisturbed), (d) textile C (W2—disturbed), and (e,f) textile C (W2—undisturbed); geotextile samples (c,e,f) show a polished section [(a,b,d) show the topography, and (c,e,f) show the Z-contrast because the samples were polished].
Figure 6. Geotextiles recorded using SEM after sampling. (a) Textile A (E1—disturbed), (b,c) textile A (E1—undisturbed), (d) textile C (W2—disturbed), and (e,f) textile C (W2—undisturbed); geotextile samples (c,e,f) show a polished section [(a,b,d) show the topography, and (c,e,f) show the Z-contrast because the samples were polished].
Water 16 01840 g006
Figure 7. Geotextiles after sampling. (a) Textile A (E1—undisturbed), and (b) textile C (W2—undisturbed); polished sections recorded via SEM with additional EDXS analysis.
Figure 7. Geotextiles after sampling. (a) Textile A (E1—undisturbed), and (b) textile C (W2—undisturbed); polished sections recorded via SEM with additional EDXS analysis.
Water 16 01840 g007
Figure 8. EDXS mapping of geotextile E1—undisturbed (shown qualitatively; the upper end of the colour scale (y-axis) indicates a large number of counts; the lower end indicates a small number of counts).
Figure 8. EDXS mapping of geotextile E1—undisturbed (shown qualitatively; the upper end of the colour scale (y-axis) indicates a large number of counts; the lower end indicates a small number of counts).
Water 16 01840 g008
Figure 9. Estimation of service lives of geotextile filters based on different in situ sampling and experimental investigations in the case of ochre clogging tendency.
Figure 9. Estimation of service lives of geotextile filters based on different in situ sampling and experimental investigations in the case of ochre clogging tendency.
Water 16 01840 g009
Figure 10. Proposal of a procedure for filter dimensioning if ochre clogging is susceptible.
Figure 10. Proposal of a procedure for filter dimensioning if ochre clogging is susceptible.
Water 16 01840 g010
Table 1. Mean water levels or tidal data, 2013–2022 [18,20].
Table 1. Mean water levels or tidal data, 2013–2022 [18,20].
Water LevelTide Gauge Rhede (Ems)Tide Gauge Elsfleth
MHW [MAMSL]1.962.19
MLW [MAMSL]−1.39−1.72
Mn [m]3.353.91
RD [h]3:215:50
FD [h]9:036:35
MLWS [MAMSL]−1.52−1.84
Note: MHW: mean high water, MLW: mean low water, Mn: mean range of tide, RD: rise duration, FD: fall duration, MLWS: mean low water spring tide.
Table 2. Research programme and investigations conducted.
Table 2. Research programme and investigations conducted.
Station Investigations
GW1-E, GW2-E, GW1.1-W, GW1.2-W, GW2.1-W, GW2.2-W
(groundwater)
-
Analysis of hydraulic and groundwater quality data (2000–2022);
-
Quarterly collection of hydraulic and groundwater quality data (Q2/2022–Q1/2023; i.e., pH value, dissolved oxygen (DO), redox potential (EH value), temperature, electric conductivity (EC), rH value, dissolved iron (Fe2+), ferric iron (Fe3+), total iron (Fetot), sodium (Na+), nitrate (NO3-N), chloride (Cl), dissolved manganese (Mn2+), total manganese (Mntot), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), total organic carbon (TOC));
-
DNA extraction and amplicon sequencing to determine types of bacteria in groundwater.
RW-E
RW-W
(river water)
-
Analysis of river water quality data (2000–2022);
-
Quarterly collection of hydraulic and river water quality data (Q2/2022–Q1/2023; i.e., see line above, redox potential (EH value) and rH value not relevant for river water).
E1, E2, E3, W1, W2
(aquifer material)
-
Determination of geotechnical and filter parameters (i.e., particle size distribution, hydraulic conductivity (kT,10 °C value), loss on ignition);
-
Determination of iron and manganese content;
-
Electron microscopy observations (i.e., scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS)).
E1, E2, E3, W2
(geotextile filter)
-
Determination of geotechnical and filter parameters (i.e., hydraulic conductivity (k value) or velocity index (VIH50), loss on ignition, mass per unit area);
-
Determination of iron and manganese content;
-
Electron microscopy observations (i.e., scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS));
-
DNA extraction and amplicon sequencing to determine types of bacteria in geotextile.
W1
(granular filter)
-
Determination of geotechnical and filter parameters (i.e., particle size distribution, hydraulic conductivity (kT,10 °C value), loss on ignition).
Table 3. Dates of groundwater and river water sampling.
Table 3. Dates of groundwater and river water sampling.
StationsNo. of Sampling
1234
GW-E (all stations)6 May 202216 August 202229 October 202225 March 2023
RW-E
GW-W (all stations)4 May 20223 August 202214 November 202214 February 2023
RW-W
Table 4. Difference in water level (ΔhW = hGW−hRW) during groundwater sampling.
Table 4. Difference in water level (ΔhW = hGW−hRW) during groundwater sampling.
StationsNo. of Samplings
1234
GW1-E0.871.030.411.05
GW2-E0.280.591.19−0.15
GW1.1-W2.371.341.511.67
GW1.2-W−0.601.992.052.22
GW2.1-Wn/a1.561.81.04
GW2.2-Wn/a0.661.732.19
all values in m
Table 5. Relevant parameters derived via sampling (mean value + standard deviation).
Table 5. Relevant parameters derived via sampling (mean value + standard deviation).
ParameterUnitGW1-EGW2-EGW1.1-WGW1.2-WGW2.1-WGW2.2-WRW-ERW-W
pH value-6.8 ± 06.7 ± 0.17.0 ± 07.3 ± 0.37.3 ± 0.17.2 ± 0.17.7 ± 0.17.7 ± 0.4
EH valuemV172.5 ± 51.2−8.5 ± 44.615.6 ± 85.543 ± 98.343 ± 92.427.5 ± 103.9217.5 ± 22.8n/a
Temp.°C11.3 ± 1.112.1 ± 1.912.1 ± 0.915.1 ± 2.814.8 ± 1.314.5 ± 4.114.5 ± 5.914.2 ± 5.9
DOmg/L3.3 ± 1.13.8 ± 1.60.9 ± 1.25.2 ± 2.83.8 ± 2.82.5 ± 1.69.2 ± 2.410.0 ± 2.1
ECµS/cm990 ± 108862 ± 1071730 ± 121743 ± 781347 ± 51697 ± 61690 ± 581153 ± 263
rH value-19.713.114.616.116.115.423.0n/a
Fe2+mg/L≤0.1 ± 010.1 ± 5.625.4 ± 2.923.7 ± 5.711.9 ± 5.423.6 ± 1.4≤0.1 ± 0≤0.1 ± 0
Fe3+mg/L≤0.1 ± 0≤0.1 ± 01.1 ± 1.40.4 ± 0.30.6 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.9≤0.1 ± 0≤0.1 ± 0
Fetotmg/L0.1 ± 09.9 ± 5.226.3 ± 0.827.8 ± 6.010.4 ± 6.614.6 ± 7.838.3 ± 22.30.5 ± 0.7
Mn2+mg/L≤0.1 ± 00.5 ± 04.4 ± 0.13.8 ± 0.52.9 ± 03.2 ± 0.3≤0.1 ± 0≤0.1 ± 0
Mntotmg/L≤0.1 ± 00.5 ± 04.5 ± 03.9 ± 0.42.9 ± 0.13.3 ± 0.21.7 ± 0.8≤0.1 ± 0
Na+mg/L56.0 ± 12.285.8 ± 23.189.1 ± 3.672.9 ± 6.6117 ± 3.7147 ± 2.244.5 ± 10.4100.9 ± 34.6
Clmg/L82.5 ± 49.199.9 ± 38.7151.8 ± 4.4158.8 ± 9.2219.0 ± 8.5317.3 ± 20.982.5 ± 21.3193.8 ± 60.1
Nitratemg/L2.9 ± 1.8≤0.1 ± 0≤0.1 ± 00.2 ± 0.1≤0.1 ± 0≤0.1 ± 00.8 ± 02.6 ± 0.7
DOCmg/L5.6 ± 05.8 ± 011.9 ± 0.210.6 ± 0.75.3 ± 0.55.1 ± 0.88.6 ± 04.5 ± 0.7
TOCmg/L5.7 ± 0.15.9 ± 0.512.6 ± 0.617.2 ± 6.24.7 ± 1.35.7 ± 0.928.2 ± 18.110.3 ± 5.4
Table 6. Overview of the sampled revetment components.
Table 6. Overview of the sampled revetment components.
StationDate of SamplingYear of ConstructionArmour LayerFilterAquifer Material
E117 August 2022198745 cm sandstone riprap
(weight per unit
area: 550–600 kg)
Geotextile ASand, 0.1–0.5 mm
E217 August 20221983Geotextile BSand, 0.1–0.6 mm
E323 November 20221987Geotextile BSand, 0.1–0.5 mm
W104 August 2022Unknown22 cm reinforced
concrete slabs + 10 cm drainage
(weight per unit
area: 670 kg)
Granular filterSand, 0.15–1.5 mm
W204 August 20221983/84 Geotextile CSand, 0.15–1.5 mm
Table 7. Filter parameters and iron and manganese contents of aquifer material samples.
Table 7. Filter parameters and iron and manganese contents of aquifer material samples.
E1E2E3W1W2
Grain size [mm]0.1–0.50.15–1.5
Coefficient of uniformity [Cu]2.1–2.42.2
Hydraulic conductivity (kT,10 °C value) [m/s]1.2 × 10−54.5 × 10−5
Loss on ignition (LOI) [%]0.40.3
Dry density [g/cm3]1.691.75
Iron content [g Fe/kg DS]10.13.233.27.01.6
Manganese content [g Mn/kg DS]0.90.91.20.20.2
Table 8. Material and filter parameters of geotextile filters.
Table 8. Material and filter parameters of geotextile filters.
UnitE1E2E3W2
Geotextile-ABBC
VirginMass per unit areag/m2>1700180018001400
VIH50mm/s17101021
k valuem/s4.1 × 10−32.6 × 10−32.6 × 10−33.9 × 10−3
Loss on ignition%≥99.9≥99.9≥99.9≥99.9
Loaded (disturbed)Mass per unit areag/m23408347023161527
k valuem/s1.3 × 10−61.1 × 10−61.4 × 10−61.0 × 10−6
Residual permeability%0.0320.0420.0540.026
Loss on ignition%FL: 45.9
AL: 79.4
FL: 45.3
AL: 79.4
-FL: 25.8
AL: 56.8
Iron contentg/m251.155.460.912.6
Manganese contentg/m287.9109.5-3.5
Loaded (undisturbed)Mass per unit areag/m27382688469843672
k valuem/s1.3 × 10−73.4 × 10−8-2.7 × 10−7
Residual permeability%0.0030.001-0.007
Loss on ignition%FL: 32.8
AL: 54.3
FL: 48.4
AL: 39.6
-FL: 51.1
AL: 92.0
Iron contentg/m2273.0162.7313.575.9
Manganese contentg/m2466.1253.1-11.5
Note: FL: filter layer. AL: additional layer.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tophoff, L.; Schüttrumpf, H.; Heimbecher, F.; Vollmer, C.; Philipp, B.; Abdullaeva, Y. Field Investigations and Service Life Assessment of Geosynthetic Filters in Tidally Influenced Revetments in Cases of Ochre Clogging. Water 2024, 16, 1840. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16131840

AMA Style

Tophoff L, Schüttrumpf H, Heimbecher F, Vollmer C, Philipp B, Abdullaeva Y. Field Investigations and Service Life Assessment of Geosynthetic Filters in Tidally Influenced Revetments in Cases of Ochre Clogging. Water. 2024; 16(13):1840. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16131840

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tophoff, Lukas, Holger Schüttrumpf, Frank Heimbecher, Christian Vollmer, Bodo Philipp, and Yulduzkhon Abdullaeva. 2024. "Field Investigations and Service Life Assessment of Geosynthetic Filters in Tidally Influenced Revetments in Cases of Ochre Clogging" Water 16, no. 13: 1840. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16131840

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop