Next Article in Journal
Reductive Sequestration of Chromate with Pyrite-Loaded nZVI@biochar Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Coal-Mine Water-Hazard Risk Evaluation Based on the Combination of Extension Theory, Game Theory, and Dempster–Shafer Evidence Theory
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Automated Machine Learning Approach to the Retrieval of Daily Soil Moisture in South Korea Using Satellite Images, Meteorological Data, and Digital Elevation Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Investigating the Performance of the Informer Model for Streamflow Forecasting

by
Nikos Tepetidis
,
Demetris Koutsoyiannis
*,
Theano Iliopoulou
and
Panayiotis Dimitriadis
Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Zographou, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2024, 16(20), 2882; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16202882
Submission received: 12 August 2024 / Revised: 30 September 2024 / Accepted: 4 October 2024 / Published: 10 October 2024

Abstract

Recent studies have shown the potential of transformer-based neural networks in increasing prediction capacity. However, classical transformers present several problems such as computational time complexity and high memory requirements, which make Long Sequence Time-Series Forecasting (LSTF) challenging. The contribution to the prediction of time series of flood events using deep learning techniques is examined, with a particular focus on evaluating the performance of the Informer model (a particular implementation of transformer architecture), which attempts to address the previous issues. The predictive capabilities of the Informer model are explored and compared to statistical methods, stochastic models and traditional deep neural networks. The accuracy, efficiency as well as the limits of the approaches are demonstrated via numerical benchmarks relating to real river streamflow applications. Using daily flow data from the River Test in England as the main case study, we conduct a rigorous evaluation of the Informer efficacy in capturing the complex temporal dependencies inherent in streamflow time series. The analysis is extended to encompass diverse time series datasets from various locations (>100) in the United Kingdom, providing insights into the generalizability of the Informer. The results highlight the superiority of the Informer model over established forecasting methods, especially regarding the LSTF problem. For a forecast horizon of 168 days, the Informer model achieves an NSE of 0.8 and maintains a MAPE below 10%, while the second-best model (LSTM) only achieves −0.63 and 25%, respectively. Furthermore, it is observed that the dependence structure of time series, as expressed by the climacogram, affects the performance of the Informer network.
Keywords: flood; river streamflow forecasting; long sequence time series forecasting (LSTF); deep learning; transformers; attention mechanism; Informer model flood; river streamflow forecasting; long sequence time series forecasting (LSTF); deep learning; transformers; attention mechanism; Informer model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tepetidis, N.; Koutsoyiannis, D.; Iliopoulou, T.; Dimitriadis, P. Investigating the Performance of the Informer Model for Streamflow Forecasting. Water 2024, 16, 2882. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16202882

AMA Style

Tepetidis N, Koutsoyiannis D, Iliopoulou T, Dimitriadis P. Investigating the Performance of the Informer Model for Streamflow Forecasting. Water. 2024; 16(20):2882. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16202882

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tepetidis, Nikos, Demetris Koutsoyiannis, Theano Iliopoulou, and Panayiotis Dimitriadis. 2024. "Investigating the Performance of the Informer Model for Streamflow Forecasting" Water 16, no. 20: 2882. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16202882

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop