Study on Mercury Distribution and Speciation in Urban Road Runoff in Nanjing City, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction:
2. Methods
2.1. Site Description
2.2. Rainfall Characteristics
2.3. Hg Analysis
2.4. Events Mean Concentrations (EMCs)
- M: total mass of the contaminant;
- V: total volume of runoff;
- C(t): concentrations of the contaminant at different times;
- Q(t): flow of runoff;
- t: runoff time.
2.5. Measurement of First Flush
- M: total mass of the contaminant;
- V: total volume of runoff;
- m(t): Cumulative mass of the contaminant at time t;
- v(t): Cumulative volume of runoff at time t;
- c(t): concentrations of the contaminant at different times;
- q(t): flow of runoff;
- t: runoff time;
- tr: runoff total duration.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. EMCs of Various Hg Species
3.2. EMCs of Hg in Different Valence States
3.3. Relationship between EMCs of Hg and TSS
3.4. Influence of Rainfall Characteristics
3.5. First Flush Effect (FF30)
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Li, P.; Feng, X.B.; Qiu, G.L.; Shang, L.H.; Li, Z.G. Mercury pollution in Asia: A review of the contaminated sites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 168, 591–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Falandysz, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.Z.; Krasińska, G.; Kojta, A.; Saba, M.; Shen, T.; Li, T.; Liu, H.G. Evaluation of the mercury contamination in mushrooms of genus Leccinum from two different regions of the world: Accumulation, distribution and probable dietary intake. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 537, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fricke, I; Götz, R.; Schleyer, R.; Püttmann, W. Analysis of sources and sinks of mercury in the urban water cycle of Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Water 2015, 7, 6097–6116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.R.; Lu, X.; Zhao, L.; An, J.; He, J.Z.; Pierce, E.M.; Johs, A.; Gu, B.H. Effects of cellular sorption on mercury bioavailability and methyl mercury production by desulfovibriodesulfuricans ND132. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 13335–13341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, L.; Wu, Z.; Cheng, I.; Wright, L.P.; Olson, M.L.; Gay, D.A.; Risch, M.R.; Brooks, S.; Castro, M.S.; Conley, G.D.; et al. The Estimated six-year mercury dry deposition across North America. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 12864–12873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chung, S.; Chon, H.T. Assessment of the level of mercury contamination from some anthropogenic sources in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. J. Geochem. Explor. 2014, 147(Part B), 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gill, L.W.; Ring, P.; Higgins, N.M.P.; Johnston, P.M. Accumulation of heavy metals in a constructed wetland treating road runoff. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 70, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sörme, L.; Lagerkvist, R. Sources of heavy metals in urban wastewater in Stockholm. Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 298, 131–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Shi, J.; Shen, G. Characteristics of metals pollution in expressway stormwater runoff. Environ. Sci. 2009, 30, 1621–1625. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Han, J.C.; Gao, X.L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.W.; Chen, Y. Distributions and transport of typical contaminants in different urban stormwater runoff under the effect of drainage systems. Desalin. Water Treat. 2014, 52, 1455–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borne, K.E.; Fassman-Beck, E.A.; Tanner, C.C. Floating treatment wetland influences on the fate of metals in road runoff retention ponds. Water Res. 2014, 48, 430–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eckley, C.S.; Brianfireun, B. Mercury mobilization in urban road runoff. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 403, 164–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ratcliffe, H.E.; Swanson, G.M.; Fischer, L.J. Human exposure to mercury: A critical assessment of the evidence of adverse health effects. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 1996, 49, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mason, R.P.; Sullivan, K.A. Mercury and methyl mercury transport through an urban watershed. Water Res. 1998, 32, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawson, N.M.; Mason, R.P.; Laporte, J.M. The fate and transport of mercury, methyl mercury, and other trace metals in Chesapeake Bay tributaries. Water Res. 2001, 35, 501–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Liu, J.; Peng, A. Mercury origin in surface runoff caused by precipitation. Agro-Environ. Prot. 2001, 20, 297–301. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Tomiyasu, T.; Minato, T.; Ruiz, W.L.G.; Kodamatani, H.; Kono, Y.; Hidaka, M.; Oki, K.; Kanzaki, R.; Taniguchi, Y.; Matsuyama, A. Influence of submarine fumaroles on the seasonal changes in mercury species in the waters of Kagoshima Bay, Japan. Mar. Chem. 2015, 177, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rimondi, V.; Costagliola, P.; Gray, J.E.; Lattanzi, P.; Nannucci, M.; Paolieri, M.; Salvadori, A. Mass loads of dissolved and particulate mercury and other trace elements in the Mt. Amiata mining district, Southern Tuscany (Italy). Environ. Sci. Pol. Res. 2014, 21, 5575–5585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, L.; Guo, Y.; Meng, B.; Yao, H.; Feng, X. Effects of damming on the distribution and methylation of mercury in Wujiang River, Southwest China. Chemosphere 2017, 185, 780–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- US Environment Protection Agency (USEPA). Results of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program; US Environment Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, K.; Saul, A.J. Specific relationships for the first flush load in combined sewer flows. Water Res. 1996, 30, 1244–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schriewer, A.; Horn, H; Helmreich, B. Time focused measurements of roof runoff quality. Corros. Sci. 2008, 50, 384–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gikas, G.D.; Tsihrintzis, V.A. Assessment of water quality of first-flush roof runoff and harvested rainwater. J. Hydrol. 2012, 466, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Z.B.; Ni, H.G.; Zeng, H.; Wei, J.B. Function formula for first flush analysis in mixed watersheds: A comparison of power and polynomial methods. J. Hydrol. 2011, 402, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.H.; Bang, K.W.; Ketchum, L.H.; Choe, J.S.; Yu, M.J. First flush analysis of urban storm runoff. Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 293, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertrand-Krajewski, J.L.; Chebbo, G.; Saget, A. Distribution of pollutant mass vs volume in stormwater discharges and the first flush phenomenon. Water Res. 1998, 32, 2341–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nevado, J.J.B.; Rodríguez, R.C.; Moreno, M.J. Mercury speciation in the Valdeazogues River–La Serena Reservoir system: Influence of Almadén (Spain) historic mining activities. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 2372–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Benoit, J.M.; Gilmour, C.C.; Mason, R.P.; Heyes, A. Sulfide controls on mercury speciation and bioavailability to methylating bacteria in sediment pore waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 951–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Bi, C.; Chen, Z. Assessment on the effect of surface dust on mercury and arsenic in rainfall-runoff in the Shanghai urban district. J. East China Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2011, 1, 195–202. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Li, Q.; Li, T.; Zhao, Q. Characteristics of heavy metal pollution in road rainfall-runoff of Tianjin city. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2011, 20, 143–148. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J.; Wang, W.; Peng, A. Mercury Species in Precipitation. Chin. J. Environ. Sci. 2000, 21, 43–47. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Paraquetti, H.H.M.; Ayres, G.A.; de Almeida, M.D.; Molisani, M.M.; Lacerda, L.D. Mercury distribution, speciation and flux in the Sepetiba Bay tributaries, SE Brazil. Water Res. 2004, 38, 1439–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- León-Borges, J.A.; Lizardi-Jiménez, M.A. Hydrocarbon pollution in underwater sinkholes of the Mexican Caribbean caused by tourism and asphalt: Historical data series and cluster analysis. Tour. Manag. 2017, 63, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charlesworth, S.; Everett, M.; McCarthy, R. A comparative study of heavy metal concentration and distribution in deposited street dusts in a large and a small urban area: Birmingham and Coventry, West Midlands, UK. Environ. Int. 2003, 29, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Catchment Identification | Area (m2) | Surrounding Land Use | Road Material | Vehicle Flow Rate (/Day) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Maqun | 1100 | Transports | Pitch | 38,400 |
Longpan road | 1200 | Transports | Pitch | 39,200 |
Zhujiang road | 1300 | Electronic | Pitch, cement | 30,000 |
Xinjiekou | 1500 | Commercial | Pitch, terrazzo | 47,800 |
Jiulonghu | 900 | University campus, thermal power plant | Pitch | 2000 |
Site | Date | Rainfall (mm) | Duration of Rainfall (min) | Runoff Time (min) | Max Storm Intensity (mm/min) | Average Storm Intensity (mm/min) | Min Storm Intensity (mm/min) | Dry Periods (h) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maqun | 12 June 2015 | 1.96 | 185 | 37 | 0.0238 | 0.0106 | 0.0060 | 32.0 |
20 June 2015 | 7.15 | 450 | 65 | 0.0350 | 0.0159 | 0.0017 | 180.5 | |
24 June 2015 | 1.27 | 100 | 85 | 0.0267 | 0.0127 | 0.0011 | 83.8 | |
29 June 2015 | 22.01 | 385 | 15 | 0.2908 | 0.0572 | 0.0017 | 47.6 | |
14 July 2015 | 6.13 | 438 | 213 | 0.0189 | 0.0140 | 0.0012 | 240.5 | |
19 July 2015 | 4.40 | 450 | 26 | 0.0500 | 0.0098 | 0.0026 | 98.3 | |
8 August 2015 | 14.30 | 288 | 38 | 0.3497 | 0.0497 | 0.0031 | 120.7 | |
21 August 2015 | 9.40 | 158 | 8 | 0.4000 | 0.0595 | 0.0019 | 23.0 | |
25 August 2015 | 2.35 | 138 | 42 | 0.0400 | 0.0013 | 0.0124 | 59.0 | |
2 May 2016 | 4.80 | 267 | 21 | 0.0800 | 0.0400 | 0.0188 | 72.4 | |
7 May 2016 | 0.91 | 121 | 52 | 0.0200 | 0.0075 | 0.0031 | 88.3 | |
Longpan road | 21 April 2015 | 12.00 | 480 | 58 | 0.2500 | 0.0921 | 0.0042 | 192.0 |
29 April 2015 | 58.00 | 90 | 30 | 3.7000 | 0.6443 | 0.0073 | 84.1 | |
7 May 2015 | 100.00 | 180 | 47 | 2.0000 | 0.5884 | 0.0023 | 156.0 | |
14 May 2015 | 23.50 | 204 | 29 | 0.2000 | 0.1966 | 0.0038 | 27.2 | |
18 May 2015 | 18.00 | 210 | 64 | 0.3900 | 0.1210 | 0.0083 | 82.3 | |
2 May 2016 | 4.80 | 267 | 21 | 0.0800 | 0.0400 | 0.0188 | 72.4 | |
7 May 2016 | 0.91 | 121 | 52 | 0.0200 | 0.0075 | 0.0031 | 88.3 | |
Zhujiang road | 29 April 2015 | 58.00 | 90 | 30 | 3.7000 | 0.6443 | 0.0073 | 84.1 |
7 May 2015 | 100.00 | 180 | 47 | 2.0000 | 0.5884 | 0.0023 | 156.0 | |
14 May 2015 | 23.50 | 204 | 29 | 0.2000 | 0.1966 | 0.0038 | 27.2 | |
18 May 2015 | 18.00 | 210 | 64 | 0.3900 | 0.1210 | 0.0083 | 82.3 | |
2 May 2016 | 4.80 | 267 | 21 | 0.0800 | 0.0400 | 0.0188 | 72.4 | |
7 May 2016 | 0.91 | 121 | 52 | 0.0200 | 0.0075 | 0.0031 | 88.3 | |
Xinjiekou | 7 May 2015 | 100.00 | 180 | 47 | 2.0000 | 0.5884 | 0.0023 | 156.0 |
14 May 2015 | 23.50 | 204 | 29 | 0.2000 | 0.1966 | 0.0038 | 27.2 | |
18 May 2015 | 18.00 | 210 | 64 | 0.3900 | 0.1210 | 0.0083 | 82.3 | |
2 May 2016 | 4.80 | 267 | 21 | 0.0800 | 0.0400 | 0.0188 | 72.4 | |
7 May 2016 | 0.91 | 121 | 52 | 0.0200 | 0.0075 | 0.0031 | 88.3 | |
Jiulonghu | 7 May 2015 | 100.00 | 180 | 47 | 2.0000 | 0.5884 | 0.0023 | 156.0 |
14 May 2015 | 23.50 | 204 | 29 | 0.2000 | 0.1966 | 0.0038 | 27.2 | |
18 May 2015 | 18.00 | 210 | 64 | 0.3900 | 0.1210 | 0.0083 | 82.3 | |
2 May 2016 | 4.80 | 267 | 21 | 0.0800 | 0.0400 | 0.0188 | 72.4 | |
7 May 2016 | 0.91 | 121 | 52 | 0.0200 | 0.0075 | 0.0031 | 88.3 |
Hg | Methods |
---|---|
THg | 50 μL stormwater, taken by pipette, was placed in a nickel boat, and Hydra II A mercury analyzer was utilized to measure the absolute values of Hg concentrations directly. |
DHg | Stormwater samples were filtered through a 0.45 μm filter membrane, and 50 μL sample was analyzed by the method of THg. |
PHg | PHg = THg-DHg [18,19] |
Hg0 | Concentrated sulfuric acid by sub-boiling distillation was used to acidify 100 mL stormwater; then, N2 was used to blow the samples at a rate of 350 to 400 mL/min for 30 min, and Hg0 was captured onto the gold tube. Finally, samples were analyzed by Hydra IIC mercury analyzer. |
Hg2+ | Stormwater samples, which have been measured for Hg0, continue to be used to analysis Hg2+. Hg2+ in water samples was reduced to Hg0 by 5 mL of 20% SnCl2. N2 was used to blow the samples at a rate of 350 to 400 mL/min for 30 min, and Hg0 as a redox product was captured onto the gold tube. Finally, samples were analyzed by Hydra IIC mercury analyzer. |
Hgre | Hgre = THg-Hg0−-Hg2+ |
Site | Date | Hg (μg/L) | DHg/PHg | log Kd | TSS (mg/L) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THg | DHg | PHg | |||||
Maqun | 12 June 2015 | 0.335 | 0.085 | 0.250 | 0.34 | 4.49 | 95 |
20 June 2015 | 2.760 | 0.786 | 1.974 | 0.40 | 4.16 | 174 | |
24 June 2015 | 0.437 | 0.175 | 0.262 | 0.67 | 4.49 | 48 | |
29 June 2015 | 0.337 | 0.102 | 0.235 | 0.43 | 4.44 | 84 | |
14 July 2015 | 3.347 | 0.862 | 2.485 | 0.35 | 4.05 | 256 | |
19 July 2015 | 0.667 | 0.236 | 0.431 | 0.55 | 4.30 | 92 | |
8 August 2015 | 3.001 | 0.778 | 2.223 | 0.35 | 3.77 | 484 | |
21 August 2015 | 0.439 | 0.215 | 0.224 | 0.96 | 4.51 | 32 | |
25 August 2015 | 0.173 | 0.069 | 0.104 | 0.66 | 4.20 | 96 | |
2 May 2016 | 0.373 | 0.127 | 0.246 | 0.52 | 4.45 | 68 | |
7 May 2016 | 0.455 | 0.136 | 0.319 | 0.43 | 4.28 | 123 | |
Mean | 1.120 | 0.234 | 0.796 | 0.515 | 4.38 | 141 | |
Median | 0.439 | 0.136 | 0.262 | 0.43 | 4.31 | 95 | |
Range | 0.173~3.347 | 0.069~0.862 | 0.104~2.485 | 0.34~0.96 | 3.77~4.51 | 32~484 | |
Longpan road | 21 April 2015 | 4.311 | 3.300 | 1.011 | 3.26 | — | — |
29 April 2015 | 8.254 | 6.823 | 1.431 | 4.77 | — | — | |
7 May 2015 | 5.241 | 4.872 | 0.369 | 13.20 | — | — | |
14 May 2015 | 2.892 | 0.491 | 2.401 | 0.20 | — | — | |
18 May 2015 | 0.519 | 0.267 | 0.252 | 1.06 | — | — | |
2 May 2016 | 3.256 | 2.431 | 0.825 | 2.95 | — | — | |
7 May 2016 | 5.230 | 3.767 | 1.463 | 2.57 | — | — | |
Mean | 4.243 | 3.151 | 1.092 | 4.00 | — | — | |
Median | 4.311 | 3.300 | 1.011 | 2.95 | — | — | |
Range | 0.519~8.254 | 0.267~6.823 | 0.252~2.401 | 0.20~13.20 | — | — | |
Zhujiang road | 29 April 2015 | 0.813 | 0.318 | 0.495 | 0.64 | — | — |
7 May 2015 | 1.332 | 0.953 | 0.379 | 2.51 | — | — | |
14 May 2015 | 1.882 | 0.745 | 1.137 | 0.66 | — | — | |
18 May 2015 | 0.711 | 0.498 | 0.214 | 2.33 | — | — | |
2 May 2016 | 1.345 | 0.917 | 0.428 | 2.14 | — | — | |
7 May 2016 | 1.025 | 0.782 | 0.243 | 3.22 | — | — | |
Mean | 1.185 | 0.702 | 0.483 | 1.92 | — | — | |
Median | 1.179 | 0.622 | 0.355 | 2.24 | — | — | |
Range | 0.711~1.882 | 0.318~0.953 | 0.214~1.137 | 0.64~3.22 | — | — | |
Xinjiekou | 7 May 2015 | 3.862 | 2.171 | 1.691 | 1.28 | — | — |
14 May 2015 | 1.892 | 0.873 | 1.019 | 0.86 | — | — | |
18 May 2015 | 1.243 | 0.531 | 0.712 | 0.75 | — | — | |
2 May 2016 | 2.659 | 1.528 | 1.131 | 1.35 | — | — | |
7 May 2016 | 2.005 | 1.229 | 0.776 | 1.58 | — | — | |
Mean | 2.332 | 1.351 | 1.432 | 1.16 | — | — | |
Median | 2.005 | 0.531 | 1.691 | 1.28 | — | — | |
Range | 1.243~3.862 | 0.531~2.171 | 0.712~1.691 | 0.75~1.58 | — | — | |
Jiulonghu | 7 May 2015 | 2.027 | 1.464 | 0.563 | 2.60 | — | — |
14 May 2015 | 0.986 | 0.663 | 0.323 | 2.05 | — | — | |
18 May 2015 | 2.045 | 1.096 | 0.949 | 1.15 | — | — | |
2 May 2016 | 1.962 | 1.593 | 0.369 | 4.32 | — | — | |
7 May 2016 | 1.410 | 0.972 | 0.438 | 2.22 | — | — | |
Mean | 1.686 | 1.074 | 0.612 | 2.47 | — | — | |
Median | 1.962 | 1.096 | 0.623 | 2.22 | — | — | |
Range | 0.986~2.045 | 0.663~1.593 | 0.323~0.949 | 1.15~4.32 | — | — |
Sites | Land Using Type | EMCs (μg/L) | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|
THg | ||||
near Ontario lake in Canada | Urban | 0.015 | [12] | |
Beijing, China | Urban | 0.1075 | [16] | |
Shanghai, China | Urban | 0.510 | [29] | |
Tianjin, China | City road A | Urban | 0.520 (0.412–2.76) | [30] |
City road B | Urban | 0.730 (0.174–1.223) | ||
Industrial district | Industry | 0.660 (0.104–1.182) | ||
Nanjing, China | Urban | 2.036 (0.173–8.254) | Current study |
Hg | TSS | Significance Level |
---|---|---|
THg | 0.807 | 0.01 |
DHg | 0.768 | 0.01 |
PHg | 0.819 | 0.01 |
Hg° | 0.850 | 0.05 |
Hg2+ | 0.923 | 0.01 |
Hgre | 0.954 | 0.01 |
Site | Date | FF30 of Hg | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
THg | DHg | PHg | ||
Longpan road | 21 April 2015 | 0.479 | 0.485 | 0.508 |
29 April 2015 | 0.471 | 0.489 | 0.384 | |
7 May 2015 | 0.378 | 0.337 | 0.907 | |
14 May 2015 | 0.276 | 0.636 | 0.195 | |
18 May 2015 | 0.535 | 0.233 | 0.372 | |
2 May 2016 | 0.523 | 0.638 | 0.583 | |
7 May 2016 | 0.492 | 0.448 | 0.473 | |
Zhujiang road | 29 April 2015 | 0.132 | 0.793 | 0.217 |
7 May 2015 | 0.179 | 0.205 | 0.181 | |
14 May 2015 | 0.496 | 0.102 | 0.332 | |
18 May 2015 | 0.319 | 0.284 | 0.177 | |
2 May 2016 | 0.255 | 0.639 | 0.291 | |
7 May 2016 | 0.364 | 0.584 | 0.195 | |
Xinjiekou | 7 May 2015 | 0.287 | 0.305 | 0.287 |
14 May 2015 | 0.483 | 0.402 | 0.483 | |
18 May 2015 | 0.373 | 0.356 | 0.386 | |
2 May 2016 | 0.404 | 0.399 | 0.329 | |
7 May 2016 | 0.378 | 0.428 | 0.372 | |
Jiulonghu | 7 May 2015 | 0.570 | 0.160 | 0.355 |
14 May 2015 | 0.450 | 0.036 | 0.692 | |
18 May 2015 | 0.407 | 0.282 | 0.482 | |
2 May 2016 | 0.529 | 0.183 | 0.622 | |
7 May 2016 | 0.358 | 0.157 | 0.475 | |
Range | 0.132~0.570 | 0.036~0.793 | 0.177~0.907 |
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Singh, R.P.; Wu, J.; Kumar, A.J.; Fu, D. Study on Mercury Distribution and Speciation in Urban Road Runoff in Nanjing City, China. Water 2017, 9, 779. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9100779
Singh RP, Wu J, Kumar AJ, Fu D. Study on Mercury Distribution and Speciation in Urban Road Runoff in Nanjing City, China. Water. 2017; 9(10):779. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9100779
Chicago/Turabian StyleSingh, Rajendra Prasad, Jiaguo Wu, Alagarasan Jagadeesh Kumar, and Dafang Fu. 2017. "Study on Mercury Distribution and Speciation in Urban Road Runoff in Nanjing City, China" Water 9, no. 10: 779. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9100779
APA StyleSingh, R. P., Wu, J., Kumar, A. J., & Fu, D. (2017). Study on Mercury Distribution and Speciation in Urban Road Runoff in Nanjing City, China. Water, 9(10), 779. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9100779