Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Data Sources and Methods
2.1. Research Data
2.2. Research Methods
3. Results
3.1. Literature Time Sequence Analysis
3.1.1. Analysis of the Annual Publication Volume
3.1.2. Analysis of Annual Average References
3.1.3. Analysis of the Dynamic Change of the Published Journals
3.2. Analysis of Major Countries/Regions and Researchers
3.2.1. Analysis of Major Countries/Regions
3.2.2. Cooperation Analysis of Major Countries
3.2.3. Analysis of the Main Authors
3.2.4. Historical Citation Analysis of the Main Authors
3.3. Keywords Analysis
3.3.1. High-Frequency Keywords Analysis
3.3.2. Co-Occurrence Network Analysis of High-Frequency Keywords
3.3.3. Analysis of the Thematic Evolution
4. Discussion
4.1. Analysis of the Research Trend of Urban Land Management
4.2. Analysis of Urban Land Management Practice
4.3. Comparative Analysis of Related Studies
4.4. Limitations of the Study and Future Research Directions
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Achmani, Y.; Vries, W.T.d.; Serrano, J.; Bonnefond, M. Determining Indicators Related to Land Management Interventions to Measure Spatial Inequalities in an Urban (Re)Development Process. Land 2020, 9, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.; Deng, X. Effects of Urbanization-Induced Cultivated Land Loss on Ecosystem Services in the North China Plain. Energies 2015, 8, 5678–5693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.-M.; Li, X.-G.; Yang, X.-Y.; Zhang, H. Analyzing the Relationship between Developed Land Area and Nighttime Light Emissions of 36 Chinese Cities. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, R. The outlook for population growth. Science 2011, 333, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- UN, Revision of World Urbanization Prospects. 2018. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html (accessed on 25 May 2020).
- Liu, X.; Huang, Y.; Xu, X.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Ciais, P.; Lin, P.; Gong, K.; Ziegler, A.D.; Chen, A.; et al. High-spatiotemporal-resolution mapping of global urban change from 1985 to 2015. Nat. Sustain. 2020, 3, 564–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Li, C.; Wang, K. How to perceive the impacts of land supply on urban management efficiency: Evidence from China’s 315 cities. Habitat Int. 2020, 98, 102145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.; Deng, X. Land-use/land-cover change and ecosystem service provision in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 576, 705–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, M.; Chen, D.; Woodstock, K.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, Y. An RP-MCE-SOP Framework for China’s County-Level “Three-Space” and “Three-Line” Planning—An Integration of Rational Planning, Multi-Criteria Evaluation, and Spatial Optimization. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hofmann, M.; Müller, N.D.; Stankiewicz, C.; Pfnür, A.; Linke, H.J. The effects of knowledge orders on climate change policy in urban land management and real estate management: A case study of three German cities. Urban Res. Pract. 2015, 8, 336–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Sun, M.; Yu, H. Managing urban ecological land as properties: Conceptual model, public perceptions, and willingness to pay. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 133, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Pijanowski, B.; Yang, W.; Zhai, R.; Omrani, H.; Li, K. Predicting multiple land use transitions under rapid urbanization and implications for land management and urban planning: The case of Zhanggong District in central China. Habitat Int. 2018, 82, 48–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milano, V.; Cortet, J.; Baldantoni, D.; Bellino, A.; Dubs, F.; Nahmani, J.; Strumia, S.; Maisto, G. Collembolan biodiversity in Mediterranean urban parks: Impact of history, urbanization, management and soil characteristics. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 119, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaborowski, T. Land acquisition and land value capture instruments as determinants of public urban infrastructure provision: A comparison of the Polish legal framework with its German counterpart. Geogr. Pol. 2018, 91, 353–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fekade, W. Deficits of formal urban land management and informal responses under rapid urban growth, an international perspective. Habitat Int. 2000, 24, 127–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angulo, J.V.; Palacios, A.; Ámez, J.M. Housing Policy and Urbanism. In Beltran, M. (Coord.) Social Housing and City; Ministry of Housing: Madrid, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Zhou, J.; Song, W. Simulating Urban Sprawl in China Based on the Artificial Neural Network-Cellular Automata-Markov Model. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.; Pijanowski, B.C. The effects of China’s cultivated land balance program on potential land productivity at a national scale. Appl. Geogr. 2014, 46, 158–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, D.; Song, W. Ecological function regionalization of the core area of the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal based on the leading ecological function perspective. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 142, 109247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arndt, L.T.; Philips, J.W.; Cordeiro, A.D.; Romano, C.A.; Catai, R.E. Domain ontology for urban land management. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Urban Des. Plan. 2014, 167, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maring, L.; Blauw, M. Asset management to support urban land and subsurface management. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Martire, D.; De Rosa, M.; Pesce, V.; Santangelo, M.A.; Calcaterra, D. Landslide hazard and land management in high-density urban areas of Campania region, Italy. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 12, 905–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garba, S.B. Public land ownership and urban land management effectiveness in metropolitan Kano, Nigeria. Habitat Int. 1997, 21, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jenkins, P. Urban management, urban poverty and urban governance: Planning and land management in Maputo. Environ. Urban. 2000, 12, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cecchini, M.; Zambon, I.; Pontrandolfi, A.; Turco, R.; Colantoni, A.; Mavrakis, A.; Salvati, L. Urban sprawl and the olive’ landscape: Sustainable land management for crisis’ cities. Geojournal 2019, 84, 237–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soltani, S.R.; Mahiny, A.S.; Monavari, S.M.; Alesheikh, A.A. Sustainability Through Uncertainty Management in Urban Land Suitability Assessment. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2013, 30, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leelananda, H.H.; Wijesekera, N.T.S.; Peiris, T.A. Potential of Urban Land Management using Geographic Information Systems. Eng. J. Inst. Eng. Sri Lanka 2008, 41, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Garba, S.B.; Al-Mubaiyedh, S. An assessment framework for public urban land management intervention. Land Use Policy 1999, 16, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olivera Lozano, G. Municipal and agrarian reforms, urban-regional expansion and management of urban land in Mexico. Econ. Soc. Y Territ. 2005, 5, 121–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, Y.; Newman, G.; Güneralp, B. A Review of Driving Factors, Scenarios, and Topics in Urban Land Change Models. Land 2020, 9, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagner, M.; de Vries, W.T. Comparative Review of Methods Supporting Decision-Making in Urban Development and Land Management. Land 2019, 8, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Asmamaw, D.K. Implications of Land Management Practices on Selected Ecosystem Services in the Agricultural Landscapes of Ethiopia:A Review. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanaček, K.; Rodríguez-Labajos, B. Impacts of land-use and management changes on cultural agroecosystem services and environmental conflicts-A global review. Glob. Environ. Change 2018, 50, 41–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bykov, V.Y.; Pinchuk, O.P.; Luparenko, L.A. Representation of Scientific Content of Encyclopedic Topics in Scientometric and Abstract Databases. Inf. Technol. Learn. Tools 2021, 85, 360–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torres-Salinas, D. Bibliometric assessment of universities with Scival of Elsevier. Prof. De La Inf. 2009, 18, 669–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mansour, E. Arab authors’ perceptions about the scholarly publishing and refereeing system used in Emerald’s library and information science journals. New Libr. World 2016, 117, 414–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, M.W. Exploration on Frontier Research Field of Informatics. In Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Economic Development and Education Management, Dalian, China, 29–30 December 2018; Volume 290, pp. 525–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Silva, D.D.; Gracio, M.C.C. Hirsch’s h-index: Comparative analysis between Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. Em Quest. 2017, 23, 196–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, W.S. The data source of this study is Web of Science Core Collection? Not enough. Scientometrics 2019, 121, 1815–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J.W.; Liu, W.S. A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics 2020, 123, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Janik, A.; Ryszko, A.; Szafraniec, M. Scientific Landscape of Smart and Sustainable Cities Literature: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ding, Y.; Chowdhury, G.G.; Foo, S. Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Inf. Processing Manag. 2001, 37, 817–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godin, B. On the origins of bibliometrics. Scientometrics 2006, 68, 109–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, H.; Zhang, Y.; Duan, K. Evolutionary overview of urban expansion based on bibliometric analysis in Web of Science from 1990 to 2019. Habitat Int. 2020, 95, 102100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhandari, A. Design Thinking: From Bibliometric Analysis to Content Analysis, Current Research Trends, and Future Research Directions. J. Knowl. Econ. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aria, M.; Cuccurullo, C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, F.; Grubesic, T.H.; Bishop, B.W. Exploring the GIS Knowledge Domain Using CiteSpace. Prof. Geogr. 2015, 67, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.J.; Mao, Y.; Ouyang, J.Y.; Zheng, S.N. A Review of Urban Microclimate Research Based on CiteSpace and VOSviewer Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, F.-F.; Huang, Y.-W.; Tsaih, D.-C.; Wu, C.-S. Trend analysis of co-authorship network in Library Hi Tech. Libr. Hi Tech 2019, 37, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guleria, D.; Kaur, G. Bibliometric analysis of ecopreneurship using VOSviewer and RStudio Bibliometrix, 1989–2019. Libr. Hi Tech 2021, Preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guler, A.T.; Waaijer, C.J.F.; Mohammed, Y.; Palmblad, M. Automating bibliometric analyses using Taverna scientific workflows: A tutorial on integrating Web Services. J. Informetr. 2016, 10, 830–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Iacobucci, A.; Robert, C. The Art of R Programming: A Tour of Statistical Software Design by Norman Matloff. Chance 2012, 25, 55–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habibi, A.; Mousavi, M.; Jamali, M.; Ale Ebrahim, N. A Bibliometric Study of Medical Tourism. Anatolia 2021, 3, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez, M.S.; Alvarez, A.M.O.; Arango-Vasquez, L. Worldwide trends in the scientific production on soccer players market value, a bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix R-tool. Team Perform. Manag. 2022, 28, 415–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, A.; Jusoh, A.; Mas’od, A.; Alsharif, A.; Ali, J. Bibliometrix analysis of information sharing in social media. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2022, 1, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, X.; He, Y. Sustainable land use and management research: A scientometric review. Landsc. Ecol. 2020, 35, 2381–2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Chen, Q.R.; Zhu, Z.H. Evolutionary Overview of Land Consolidation Based on Bibliometric Analysis in Web of Science from 2000 to 2020. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, C. Retrospective research on the interactions between land-cover change and global warming using bibliometrics during 1991–2018. Environ. Earth Sci. 2021, 80, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xianchun, Z.; Zhuoran, S. The Research Review of Land-Use and Land-Management Problems in the Joint of Urban and Rural Area for the Last Two Decades. Energy Procedia 2012, 16, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xiandong, L.; Ying, H.; Xianmei, L.; Sinuo, L.; Qiao, M.; Jianzhong, G. Review of China’s rural land management system reform: 1949–2019. Environ. Earth Sci. 2022, 81, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore-Cherry, N.; Kayanan, C.M.; Tomaney, J.; Pike, A. Governing the Metropolis: An International Review of Metropolitanisation, Metropolitan Governance and the Relationship with Sustainable Land Management. Land 2022, 11, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Fang, Z.; Sun, X. Usage patterns of scholarly articles on Web of Science: A study on Web of Science usage count. Scientometrics 2016, 109, 917–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lancho-Barrantes, B.S.; Cantu-Ortiz, F.J. Science in Mexico: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 2019, 118, 499–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Pandey, N.; Lim, W.M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 133, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez-Soler, R.; Uribe-Toril, J.; Valenciano, J.D. Worldwide trends in the scientific production on rural depopulation, a bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix R-tool. Land Use Policy 2020, 97, 104787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Lv, T. A Bibliometric Analysis on Land Degradation: Current Status, Development, and Future Directions. Land 2020, 9, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guo, Y.-M.; Huang, Z.-L.; Guo, J.; Li, H.; Guo, X.-R.; Nkeli, M.J. Bibliometric Analysis on Smart Cities Research. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leaf, M.; Pamuk, A. Habitat II and the globalization of ideas. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 1997, 17, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cartwright, T.J. Information systems for planning in developing countries: Some lessons from the experience of the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat). Habitat Int. 1987, 11, 191–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McGill, R. Making Towns Work: Habitat III—What Relevance? Plan. Theory Pract. 2018, 19, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gultekin, A.B.; Dikmen, C.B.; Erciyes, A.H.; Orgu, D. An Examination of Sustainability and United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: Turkey Case. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Sustainable Buildings Symposium, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 15–17 March 2017; pp. 252–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buckley, R.M.; Simet, L. An agenda for Habitat III: Urban perestroika. Environ. Urban. 2016, 28, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stiftel, B. Planners and the new urban agenda: Will we lead the agenda, or will the agenda lead us? Town Plan. Rev. 2021, 92, 421–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hague, C. Delivering the New Urban Agenda Through Urban and Territorial Planning. Plan. Theory Pract. 2018, 19, 618–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caprotti, F.; Cowley, R.; Datta, A.; Broto, V.C.; Gao, E.; Georgeson, L.; Herrick, C.; Odendaal, N.; Joss, S. The New Urban Agenda: Key opportunities and challenges for policy and practice. Urban Res. Pract. 2017, 10, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Watson, V. Locating planning in the New Urban Agenda of the urban sustainable development goal. Plan. Theory 2016, 15, 435–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eduful, M.; Shively, D. Perceptions of urban land use and degradation of water bodies in Kumasi, Ghana. Habitat Int. 2015, 50, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolch, J.R.; Byrne, J.; Newell, J.P. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 125, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, W.; Zhou, W.; Bai, Y.; Pickett, S.; Han, L. The smart growth of Chinese cities: Opportunities offered by vacant land. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, A. Smart Growth Policies: An Evaluation of Programs and Outcomes. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2009, 76, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westerink, J.; Haase, D.; Bauer, A.; Ravetz, J.; Jarrige, F.; Aalbers, C. Dealing with Sustainability Trade-Offs of the Compact City in Peri-Urban Planning Across European City Regions. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2013, 21, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, S.; Hu, S.; Li, W.; Wang, H.; Zhang, C.; Li, Q. Interaction between urban land expansion and land use policy: An analysis using the DPSIR framework. Land Use Policy 2020, 99, 104856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, M.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Z. Compactness or sprawl: Multi-dimensional approach to understanding the urban growth patterns in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 138, 108816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahana, M.; Hong, H.; Sajjad, H. Analyzing urban spatial patterns and trend of urban growth using urban sprawl matrix: A study on Kolkata urban agglomeration, India. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 628–629, 1557–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.T. The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roldan-Valadez, E.A.-O.; Salazar-Ruiz, S.Y.; Ibarra-Contreras, R.; Rios, C. Current concepts on bibliometrics: A brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2018, 188, 939–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Darabi, H.; Choubin, B.; Rahmati, O.; Torabi Haghighi, A.; Pradhan, B.; Kløve, B. Urban flood risk mapping using the GARP and QUEST models: A comparative study of machine learning techniques. J. Hydrol. 2019, 569, 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowak, D.J.; Rowntree, R.A.; McPherson, E.G.; Sisinni, S.M.; Kerkmann, E.R.; Stevens, J.C. Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1996, 36, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Phillips, J.; Goodstein, E. Growth Management and Housing Prices: The Case of Portland, Oregon. Contemp. Econ. Policy 2000, 18, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasse, J.E.; Lathrop, R.G. Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl. Appl. Geogr. 2003, 23, 159–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, F.; Sawaya, K.E.; Loeffelholz, B.C.; Bauer, M.E. Land cover classification and change analysis of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) Metropolitan Area by multitemporal Landsat remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 2005, 98, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weng, Q. Remote sensing of impervious surfaces in the urban areas: Requirements, methods, and trends. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 117, 34–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, H.J.; Chong, A.Y.L.; Wang, H.D.; Wang, L.Y.; Huang, Y.K. Quantitative Decision Making in Land Banking: A Monte Carlo Simulation for China’s Real Estate Developers. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. 2012, 16, 355–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Cao, Y.; He, Z.; He, J.; Cao, Y.; Wang, J.; Fang, X. Understanding the Diversity of Urban–Rural Fringe Development in a Fast Urbanizing Region of China. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, F.; Xu, N.; Wang, C.; Wu, F.; Chu, X. Effects of land use and land cover change on carbon sequestration and adaptive management in Shanghai, China. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2020, 120, 102948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagner, M.; Mager, C.; Schmidt, N.; Kiese, N.; Growe, A. Conflicts about Urban Green Spaces in Metropolitan Areas under Conditions of Climate Change: A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Planning Processes. Urban Sci. 2019, 3, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lazar, N.; Chithra, K. Comprehensive bibliometric mapping of publication trends in the development of Building Sustainability Assessment Systems. Environ. Dev. Sustain 2021, 23, 4899–4923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazak, J. The Use of a Decision Support System for Sustainable Urbanization and Thermal Comfort in Adaptation to Climate Change Actions—The Case of the Wrocław Larger Urban Zone (Poland). Sustainability 2018, 10, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Weismayer, C.; Pezenka, I. Identifying emerging research fields: A longitudinal latent semantic keyword analysis. Scientometrics 2017, 113, 1757–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, M. The Sankey Diagram in Energy and Material Flow Management. J. Ind. Ecol. 2008, 12, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiangui, L.; Li, W.; Hualin, X.; Xinmin, Z.; Yanwei, Z. Exploring the Global Research Trends of Land Use Planning Based on a Bibliometric Analysis: Current Status and Future Prospects. Land 2021, 10, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.M.; Chowdhury, M.A.M.; Begum, R.A.; Amir, A.A. A bibliometric analysis on the research trends of climate change effects on economic vulnerability. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 23, 59300–59315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Zhou, Y. Territory spatial planning and national governance system in China. Land Use Policy 2021, 102, 105288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frenkel, A.; Orenstein, D. Can Urban Growth Management Work in an Era of Political and Economic Change? J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2012, 78, 16–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, M.J.; Watt, T.; Pincetl, S. The push and pull of land use policy: Reconstructing 150 years of development and conservation land acquisition. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, J. Strategies for Low-Carbon Green Growth and Urban Management in Korea. J. Urban Manag. 2013, 2, 85–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angel, S.; Parent, J.; Civco, D.L.; Blei, A.; Potere, D. The dimensions of global urban expansion: Estimates and projections for all countries, 2000–2050. Prog. Plan. 2011, 75, 53–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robert, S.; Prevost, A.; Fox, D.; Trémélo, M.-L.; Pasqualini, V. Coastal Urbanization and Land Planning in Southern France. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Mediterranean Coastal Environment, Varna, Bulgaria, 6–10 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Massad, R.S.; Lathière, J.; Strada, S.; Perrin, M.; Personne, E.; Stéfanon, M.; Stella, P.; Szopa, S.; de Noblet, N. Reviews and syntheses: Influences of landscape structure and land uses on local to regional climate and air quality. Biogeosciences 2019, 16, 2369–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lord, S.; Frémond, M.; Bilgin, R.; Gerber, P. Growth modelling and the management of urban sprawl: Questioning the performance of sustainable planning policies. Plan. Theory Pract. 2015, 16, 385–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; He, J.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liang, H.; Wang, H.; Hong, Y. Classifying urban land use by integrating remote sensing and social media data. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2017, 31, 1675–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Y.; Song, W.; Dong, X.F. Evaluating the Space Use of Large Railway Hub Station Areas in Beijing toward Integrated Station-City Development. Land 2021, 10, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porter, M.E. New strategies for inner-city economic development. Econ. Dev. Q. 1997, 11, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heinrich, A.J. Urban Governance in Urban Redevelopment Processes in Mid-Sized East German Cities: Patterns of Governance in Urban Redevelopment Processes Using the IBA Cities of Bernburg and Weissenfels as Case Studies. Disp 2013, 49, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Lin, Y.L.; Hooimeijer, P.; Geertman, S. Heterogeneity of public participation in urban redevelopment in Chinese cities: Beijing versus Guangzhou. Urban Stud. 2020, 57, 1903–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Campbell, S. Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities?: Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 1996, 62, 296–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durand-Lasserve, A.; Royston, L. Holding Their Ground: Secure Land Tenure for the Urban Poor in Developing Countries; Earthscan Publications Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mulherin, S. Affordable housing and white poverty concentration. J. Urban Aff. 2000, 22, 139–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scholz, M.; Hedmark, Å.; Hartley, W. Recent advances in sustainable multifunctional land and urban management in Europe: A review. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2012, 55, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Journal | h-Index | g-Index | m-Index | TC | NP | PY-Start |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Landscape and Urban Planning | 70 | 112 | 2.118 | 17,080 | 356 | 1991 |
Remote Sensing | 27 | 40 | 2.250 | 2947 | 211 | 2011 |
Journal of Hydrology | 35 | 64 | 1.591 | 5052 | 154 | 2001 |
Habitat International | 33 | 58 | 0.750 | 4269 | 136 | 1979 |
Remote Sensing of Environment | 33 | 51 | 1.269 | 5705 | 51 | 1997 |
Country | Articles | SCP | MCP | Total Citations | Average Article Citations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
USA | 1244 | 1085 | 159 | 39,715 | 31.93 |
China | 1091 | 835 | 256 | 19,878 | 18.22 |
Australia | 274 | 207 | 67 | 7428 | 27.11 |
Italy | 244 | 193 | 51 | 4212 | 17.26 |
United Kingdom | 234 | 166 | 68 | 6464 | 27.62 |
Spain | 208 | 169 | 39 | 2958 | 14.22 |
Brazil | 205 | 177 | 28 | 763 | 3.72 |
India | 183 | 162 | 21 | 2640 | 14.43 |
Germany | 180 | 117 | 63 | 4200 | 23.33 |
Canada | 167 | 131 | 36 | 3093 | 18.52 |
Author | h-Index | g-Index | m-Index | TC | NP | PY-Start |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRADHAN B | 13 | 20 | 1.300 | 758 | 20 | 2013 |
ZHAO PJ | 13 | 14 | 0.929 | 728 | 14 | 2009 |
LI X | 11 | 19 | 0.440 | 900 | 19 | 1998 |
LIU YX | 11 | 12 | 1.100 | 516 | 12 | 2013 |
SALVATI L | 11 | 17 | 1.000 | 713 | 17 | 2012 |
ZHOU WQ | 11 | 17 | 1.000 | 1209 | 17 | 2012 |
JIM CY | 10 | 16 | 0.385 | 345 | 16 | 1997 |
WANG J | 10 | 23 | 0.667 | 566 | 25 | 2008 |
YANG J | 10 | 15 | 0.714 | 566 | 15 | 2009 |
FLETCHER TD | 9 | 9 | 0.900 | 499 | 9 | 2013 |
Publications | DOI | Year | LCS | GCS |
---|---|---|---|---|
WENG QH, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON | 10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.030 | 2012 | 55 | 660 |
YUAN F, 2005, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON | 10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.006 | 2005 | 50 | 628 |
BENGSTON DN, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.007 | 2004 | 38 | 341 |
HU TY, 2016, REMOTE SENS-BASEL | 10.3390/rs8020151 | 2016 | 34 | 224 |
COOK EM, 2012, URBAN ECOSYST | 10.1007/s11252-011-0197-0 | 2012 | 31 | 253 |
PHILLIPS J, 2000, CONTEMP ECON POLICY | 10.1093/cep/18.3.334 | 2000 | 31 | 105 |
HASSE JE, 2003, APPL GEOGR | 10.1016/j.apgeog.2003.08.002 | 2003 | 30 | 283 |
CARRUTHERS JI, 2002, URBAN STUD | 10.1080/0042098022000011317 | 2002 | 30 | 101 |
PENDALL R, 2000, J AM PLANN ASSOC | 10.1080/01944360008976094 | 2000 | 29 | 210 |
NOWAK DJ, 1996, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN | 10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00324-6 | 1996 | 27 | 225 |
Publications | DOI | Year | LCS | GCS |
---|---|---|---|---|
WENG QH, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON | 10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.030 | 2012 | 55 | 660 |
YUAN F, 2005, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON | 10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.006 | 2005 | 50 | 628 |
BENGSTON DN, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.007 | 2004 | 38 | 341 |
YANG LM, 2003, CAN J REMOTE SENS | 10.5589/m02-098 | 2003 | 18 | 337 |
HASSE JE, 2003, APPL GEOGR | 10.1016/j.apgeog.2003.08.002 | 2003 | 30 | 283 |
THEOBALD DM, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.06.002 | 2007 | 23 | 278 |
THEOBALD DM, 2001, GEOGR REV | 10.2307/3594740 | 2001 | 23 | 257 |
COOK EM, 2012, URBAN ECOSYST | 10.1007/s11252-011-0197-0 | 2012 | 31 | 253 |
CHIN A, 2006, GEOMORPHOLOGY | 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.033 | 2006 | 21 | 248 |
ZHAO PJ, 2010, HABITAT INT | 10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.09.008 | 2010 | 18 | 239 |
Keywords | Frequency | Keywords | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
Management | 877 | Area | 160 |
City/Cities | 633 | Ecosystem Services | 160 |
Land Use | 572 | China | 157 |
Impact/Impacts | 542 | Land Use Change | 140 |
Urbanization | 477 | Sprawl | 140 |
Model | 253 | Cover | 128 |
Climate Change | 243 | Water | 123 |
Urban | 241 | Quality | 118 |
Classification | 225 | Framework | 116 |
Dynamics | 219 | Governance | 113 |
GIS | 216 | Climate | 111 |
Patterns | 216 | Forest | 109 |
Biodiversity | 212 | Expansion | 108 |
Growth | 205 | United States | 107 |
Landscape | 204 | Land Cover | 105 |
Land | 196 | Ecology | 104 |
Conservation | 190 | Region | 101 |
Areas | 177 | Scale | 99 |
Vegetation | 168 | Systems | 98 |
Policy | 167 | Runoff | 96 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sheng, S.; Song, W.; Lian, H.; Ning, L. Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics. Land 2022, 11, 1968. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11111968
Sheng S, Song W, Lian H, Ning L. Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics. Land. 2022; 11(11):1968. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11111968
Chicago/Turabian StyleSheng, Shuangqing, Wei Song, Hua Lian, and Lei Ning. 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics" Land 11, no. 11: 1968. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11111968