Next Article in Journal
Future Role of Exotic Tree Species in Hungarian Built Heritage Environments
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Distribution and Driving Forces of the Vegetable Industry in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

How Are Historical Villages Changed? A Systematic Literature Review on European and Chinese Cultural Heritage Preservation Practices in Rural Areas

1
Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning, Polytechnic University of Turin, Viale Pier Andrea Mattioli 39, 10125 Turin, Italy
2
Department of Architecture and Engineering, Faculty of Architecture and Design, Polis University, Rr. Bylis 12, 1051 Tirana, Albania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2022, 11(7), 982; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11070982
Submission received: 23 May 2022 / Revised: 16 June 2022 / Accepted: 22 June 2022 / Published: 28 June 2022

Abstract

Background: In the past century, the importance of historical villages has been highly recognized, as they serve aesthetic, functional, and environmental values and can foster local socioeconomic development through the heritagization process. The purpose of this paper is to outline the core features of the preservation and management of historical villages in the European and Chinese contexts. Methods: Using a qualitative systematic literature review, the research was based on international academic papers covering 73 case studies from the two contexts, addressing the fact that little work has been carried out comparing European and Chinese realities. Results: Similarities and differences in rural cultural heritage preservation and management between Europe and China were compared and discussed, paying particular attention to historical villages in both contexts. Using this method, rural heritage preservation in China can be better framed and analyzed for scholars engaged in both the Chinese and international contexts. Conclusions: Inspired by the European case studies, the research suggests that capacity building of different types of stakeholders, contextualized financial mechanism and multiple values the civic society perceived and recognized during the Chinese rural heritage preservation and management process should be further studied and implemented case by case based on a historical-sensitive approach. In addition, the issue of the lack of social capital and policy arrangements in rural areas should be further addressed to stimulate community resilience.
Keywords: rural heritage preservation; historical villages; literature review; community engagement; Europe; China rural heritage preservation; historical villages; literature review; community engagement; Europe; China

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mu, Q.; Aimar, F. How Are Historical Villages Changed? A Systematic Literature Review on European and Chinese Cultural Heritage Preservation Practices in Rural Areas. Land 2022, 11, 982. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11070982

AMA Style

Mu Q, Aimar F. How Are Historical Villages Changed? A Systematic Literature Review on European and Chinese Cultural Heritage Preservation Practices in Rural Areas. Land. 2022; 11(7):982. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11070982

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mu, Qi, and Fabrizio Aimar. 2022. "How Are Historical Villages Changed? A Systematic Literature Review on European and Chinese Cultural Heritage Preservation Practices in Rural Areas" Land 11, no. 7: 982. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11070982

APA Style

Mu, Q., & Aimar, F. (2022). How Are Historical Villages Changed? A Systematic Literature Review on European and Chinese Cultural Heritage Preservation Practices in Rural Areas. Land, 11(7), 982. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11070982

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop