Spatial Distribution of the Fertility Parameters in Sericulture Soil: A Case Study of Dimapur District, Nagaland
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Lithology of the Study Area
2.3. Soil Sampling and Analysis
2.4. Nutrient Index
- Nt = total number of samples analysed for a nutrient in given area;
- Nl = number of samples falling in the low category of nutrient status;
- Nm = number of samples falling in the medium category of nutrient status;
- Nh = number of samples falling in the high category of nutrient status.
2.5. Data Interpretation in GIS Environment
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Soil pH and Organic Carbon Content
3.2. Electrical Conductivity
3.3. Macronutrients
3.4. Micronutrients
3.5. Multinutrient Deficiencies
3.6. Correlation Analysis of Available Nutrients in Muga and Eri Farms in Dimapur of Nagaland
3.7. Nutrient Index and Sulphur Availability Index
3.8. Contribution of Muga and Eri Silk Production to Soil Conservation
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kumar, A.; Vinodakumar, S.N.; Tamuly, B.; Krishna, G.; Rai, A.; Shabnam, A.A.; Jigyasu, D.K.; Luikham, R.; Hazarika, U.; Ahmed, S.A.; et al. Assessment of Nutritional Status of the Acidic Soils of Manipur Vanya Sericulture: Levels and Spatial Distributions. J. Soil Salin. Water Qual. 2021, 13, 204–213. [Google Scholar]
- Anonymous. Seri-States of India 2019—A Profile; Central Silk Board Ministry of Textiles—Government of India BTM Layout: Bengaluru, India, 2019; p. 180.
- Choudhury, B.U.; Fiyaz, A.R.; Mohapatra, K.P.; Ngachan, S. Impact of land uses, agro-physical variables and altitudinal gradient of soil organic carbon concentration of north-eastern Himalayan region of India. Land Degrad. Dev. 2016, 27, 1163–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choudhury, B.U.; Ansari, M.A.; Chakraborty, M.; Meetei, T.T. Effect of land-use change along altitudinal gradients on soil micronutrients in the mountain ecosystem of Indian (Eastern) Himalaya. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 14279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Seitinthang, L.H. Cropping pattern of north east India: An appraisal. Am. Res. Thoughts 2014, 1, 488–498. [Google Scholar]
- Bandyopadhyay, B.; Ray, P.; Padua, S.; Ramachandran, S.; Jena, R.K.; Roy, D.P.; Dutta, D.P.; Ray, S.K. Priority Zoning of Available Micronutrients in the Soils of Agroecological Sub-regions of North-East India Using Geo-spatial Techniques. Agric. Res. 2018, 7, 200–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarmah, M.C.; Neog, K.; Das, A.; Phukan, J.C.D. Impact of soil fertility and leaf nutrients status on cocoon production of Muga silkworm, Antheraeaassamensis (Helfer) in potential muga growing areas of Assam, India. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2013, 2, 25–38. [Google Scholar]
- Devi, S.A.; Sakthivel, N. Impact of Repeated Applications of Chemical Fertilizers in Mulberry Cropping System on Soil Health, Leaf Production and Rearing Parameters of Silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 2018, 23, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.K.; Kumar, K.S.; Aier, B.; Kanduri, V.P.; Ahirwar, S. Plant community characteristics and soil status in different land use systemsin Dimapur district, Nagaland, India. Leoene Pract. Badaw. For. Res. Pap. 2012, 73, 305–312. [Google Scholar]
- Government of Nagaland. Nagaland State Action Plan on Climate Change: Achieving a Low Carbon Development Trajectory, Version 2012.2; 2012; p. 187. Available online: https://moef.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Nagaland.pdf (accessed on 16 April 2023).
- Jackson, M.L. Soil Chemical Analysis; Prentice Hall of Indian (Pvt.) Limited: New Delhi, India, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Walkley, A.; Black, I.A. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934, 37, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subbiah, B.V.; Asija, G.L. A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Curr. Sci. 1956, 25, 259–260. [Google Scholar]
- Bray, H.R.; Kurtz, L.T. Determination of total organic and available forms of phosphorus in soil. Soil Sci. 1945, 59, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chesmin, L.; Yien, C.H. Turbidometric determination of available sulphate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 1951, 15, 149–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, C.H.; Steinbergs, A. Soil sulphur fractions as chemical indices of available sulphur in some Australian soils. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1959, 10, 340–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.W.; Cao, Z.H.; Hu, Z.Y.; Xu, C.K. Status of Sulfur in Mulberry Leaves–Silkworm Cocoon System of Typical Mulberry Gardens in the Lower to Middle Reaches of the Yangtse River. J. Plant Nutr. 2005, 28, 1801–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindsay, W.L.; Norvell, W.A. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1978, 42, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donahue, R.L.; Miller, R.W.; Shiklune, J.C. Soils—An Introduction to Soil and Plant Growth; University of Wisconsin Madison: Madison, WI, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Takkar, P.N. Soil fertility, fertilizer and integrated nutrient use. In Hand Book of Agriculture, 6th revised ed.; Rai, M., Agarwal, D.K., Sharma, R.P., Verma, S.A., Kumar, A.T., Prahan, S., Eds.; Indian Council of Agriculture: New Delhi, India, 2009; p. 516. [Google Scholar]
- Motsara, M.R.; Singh, J.; Verma, K.P.S. Nutrients indexing system in soil fertility evaluation and fertilizer use in India. Fertil. News 1982, 27, 92–99. [Google Scholar]
- Jena, R.K.; Duraisami, V.P.; Sivasamy, R.; Shanmugasundaram, R.; Krishnan, R.; Padua, S.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Ramachandran, S.; Ray, P.; Roy, D.P.; et al. Spatial variability of soil fertility parameters in Jirang Block of Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. Clay Res. 2015, 34, 35–45. [Google Scholar]
- Padua, S.; Chattopadhyay, T.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Ramachandran, S.; Jena, R.K.; Ray, P.; Roy, D.P.; Baruah, U.; Sah, K.D.; Singh, S.K.; et al. A simplified soil nutrient information system: Study from the North East Region of India. Curr. Sci. 2018, 114, 1241–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandyopadhyay, S.; Baruah, U.; Das, T.H.; Dutta, D.; Reza, S.K.; Padua, S.; Sarkar, D.; Sah, K.D.; Singh, S.K. Assessment and Mapping of Some Important Soil Parameters Including Macro and Micronutrients for the State of Nagaland towards Optimum Utilization of Land Resources for Integrated and Sustainable Development; NBSS Publication: Nagpur, India, 2014; p. 287. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, R.; Rawat, K.S.; Singh, J.; Singh, A.; Rai, A. Soil aggregation dynamics and carbon sequestration. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2013, 5, 250–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GirijaVeni, V.; Srinivasarao, C.H.; Sammi, R.K.; Sharma, K.L.; Ashish, R. Soil Health and Climate Change. In Climate Change and Soil Interactions; Prasad, M.N.V., Pietrzykowski, M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baruah, R.; Medh, I.B.K.; Patgiri, D.K.; Bhattacharyya, D.; Deka, C.R. Soil organic carbon stock in agricultural land of Jorhat district of Assam. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2017, 16, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, J.L. Soil pH and the Availability of Plant Nutrients. IPNI Plant Nutr. Today 2010, 2, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Miller, F.C. Minimizing odor generation. In Science and Engineering of Composting: Design, Environmental, Microbiological, and Utilization Aspects; Hoitink, H.A.J., Keener, H.M., Eds.; Renaissance Publications: Worthington, OH, USA, 1993; pp. 219–241. [Google Scholar]
- Venkatesh, M.S.; Majumdar, B.; Kumar, K. Status of Micronutrient Cations under Various Land Use Systems of Meghalaya. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 2003, 51, 60–64. [Google Scholar]
- Havlin, J.L.; Beaton, J.D.; Tisdale, S.L.; Nelson, W.L. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers, 6th ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1999; p. 499. [Google Scholar]
- Smaling, E.M.A.; Braun, A.R. Soil fertility research in Sub-Saharan Africa: New dimensions, new challenges. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1996, 27, 365–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rai, A.; Singh, S. Available nutrients status in black soils of Varanasi district of eastern part of Uttar Pradesh. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2018, 10, 1238–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakal, R.; Singh, A.P. Sulphur in Balanced Fertilisation in Eastern India. In Proceedings of the Suphur Institute (TSI)/Fertiliser Association of India (FAI)/International Fertiliser Industry Association (IFA) Symp on Sulphur in Balanced Fertilisation, New Delhi, India, 13–14 February 1997; Volume SI-2, pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Tandon, H.L.S.; Messick, D.L. Practical Sulphur Guide; The Sulphur Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2002; p. 20. [Google Scholar]
- Trivedi, S.K.; Bansal, K.N.; Tomar, R.A.S.; Verma, R.S. Vertical distribution of forms of sulphurinsome profiles of Morena and Bhind district of Madhya Pradesh. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 2000, 48, 238–241. [Google Scholar]
- Saha, R.; Chaudhary, R.S.; Somasundaram, J. Soil Health Management under Hill Agroecosystem of North East India. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2012, 2012, 696174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Temjen, W.; Singh, M.R.; Ajungla, T. Effect of shifting cultivation and fallow on soil quality index in Mokokchung district, Nagaland, India. Ecol. Process. 2022, 11, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, P.; Chattaraj, S.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Jena, R.K.; Singh, S.K.; Ray, S.K. Shifting cultivation, soil degradation, and agricultural land-use planning in the northeastern hill region of India using geo-spatial techniques. Land Degrad. Dev. 2021, 32, 3870–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Parameters | Categories | ||
---|---|---|---|
Low | Medium | High | |
OC (%) | <0.4 | 0.4–0.75 | >0.75 |
N (kg ha−1) | <280 | 280–560 | >560 |
P (kg ha−1) | <34 | 34–68 | >68 |
K (kg ha−1) | <110 | 110–280 | >280 |
S (mg kg−1) | <10 | 10–20 | >20 |
Zn (mg kg−1) | <0.6 | 0.6–1.2 | >1.2 |
B (mg kg−1) | <0.5 | 0.5–1.0 | >1.0 |
Fe (mg kg−1) | <4.5 | 4.5–9.0 | >9.0 |
Cu (mg kg−1) | <0.2 | 0.2–0.4 | >0.4 |
IF | All the Layers Have Value of 1 | High Priority Area |
---|---|---|
ELSE IF | Two layers have value of 1 and one layer has value of 2 | High priority area |
ELSE IF | Two layers have value of 2 and one layer has value of 1 | High priority area |
ELSE IF | All the layers have value of 2 | Medium priority area |
ELSE IF | One layer has value of 1, one layer has value of 2 and one layer has value of 3 | Medium priority area |
ELSE IF | Two layers have value of 2 and one layer has value of 3 | Medium priority area |
ELSE IF | All the layers have value of 3 | Low priority area |
ELSE IF | Two layers have value of 3 and one layer has value of 2 | Low priority area |
Statistical Parameters | pH | EC | OC | Available N | Available P | Available K | Available S | Available Zn | Available B | Available Fe | Available Mn | Available Cu | SAI | SNI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(kg ha−1) | (kg ha−1) | (kg ha−1) | (mg kg−1) | (mg kg−1) | (mg kg−1) | (mg kg−1) | (mg kg−1) | (mg kg−1) | ||||||
Min | 3.06 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 179.80 | 2.68 | 6.24 | 0.00 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 10.20 | 4.50 | 2.71 | 0.26 | 1.66 |
Max | 6.84 | 0.30 | 1.98 | 612.50 | 154.60 | 315.50 | 26.00 | 7.39 | 6.44 | 34.30 | 33.20 | 33.00 | 11.81 | 2.89 |
Mean | 5.11 | 0.13 | 0.95 | 356.32 | 51.70 | 146.39 | 13.67 | 2.77 | 2.70 | 23.47 | 15.95 | 18.23 | 6.42 | 2.01 |
Median | 5.09 | 0.13 | 0.91 | 347.15 | 42.50 | 138.35 | 13.50 | 2.45 | 2.57 | 23.10 | 15.70 | 17.80 | 6.36 | 1.86 |
SD | 0.81 | 0.06 | 0.39 | 96.75 | 36.50 | 66.92 | 4.99 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 5.32 | 5.02 | 5.66 | 0.17 | 0.45 |
Kurtosis | −0.33 | −0.25 | −0.41 | −0.38 | −0.22 | 0.04 | −0.14 | 0.62 | −0.44 | −0.69 | 0.37 | −0.05 | −0.16 | 0.92 |
Skewness | −0.10 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.75 | 0.51 | 0.24 | 0.69 | 0.36 | −0.04 | 0.47 | 0.34 | 0.14 | 1.52 |
CV | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 15.94 | 6.01 | 11.02 | 0.82 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.93 | 0.34 | 0.32 |
pH | EC | OC | N | P | K | S | Zn | B | Fe | Mn | Cu | SAI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 1 | ||||||||||||
EC | 0.15 | 1 | |||||||||||
OC | 0.13 | 0.51 ** | 1 | ||||||||||
N | 0.13 | 0.51 ** | 0.98 ** | 1 | |||||||||
P | 0.17 * | −0.14 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 1 | ||||||||
K | −0.00 | 0.19 * | 0.14 | 0.16 * | −0.16 | 1 | |||||||
S | 0.06 | 0.17 * | 0.15 | 0.14 | −0.02 | 0.03 | 1 | ||||||
Zn | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.21 * | −0.05 | −0.08 | 1 | |||||
B | 0.08 | −0.06 | 0.19 * | 0.19 * | 0.31 ** | −0.07 | 0.03 | 0.37 ** | 1 | ||||
Fe | −0.02 | −0.03 | −0.10 | −0.11 | −0.05 | −0.13 | −0.06 | −0.06 | 0.06 | 1 | |||
Mn | −0.03 | 0.10 | 0.21 * | 0.23 ** | 0.12 | −0.09 | −0.016 | 0.19 * | 0.17 * | −0.09 | 1 | ||
Cu | 0.07 | −0.08 | −0.03 | −0.06 | −0.03 | −0.06 | 0.03 | 0.19 * | −0.13 | −0.12 | 0.09 | 1 | |
SAI | 0.08 | 0.26 ** | 0.33 ** | 0.32 ** | −0.01 | 0.05 | 0.98 ** | −0.05 | 0.06 | −0.08 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jigyasu, D.K.; Kumar, A.; Shabnam, A.A.; Sharma, G.K.; Jena, R.K.; Das, B.; Naik, V.S.; Ahmed, S.A.; Kumari, K.M.V. Spatial Distribution of the Fertility Parameters in Sericulture Soil: A Case Study of Dimapur District, Nagaland. Land 2023, 12, 956. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12050956
Jigyasu DK, Kumar A, Shabnam AA, Sharma GK, Jena RK, Das B, Naik VS, Ahmed SA, Kumari KMV. Spatial Distribution of the Fertility Parameters in Sericulture Soil: A Case Study of Dimapur District, Nagaland. Land. 2023; 12(5):956. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12050956
Chicago/Turabian StyleJigyasu, Dharmendra Kumar, Amit Kumar, Aftab Ahmad Shabnam, Gulshan Kumar Sharma, Roomesh Kumar Jena, Bachaspati Das, Vinodakumar Somashing Naik, Siddique Ali Ahmed, and Kasthala Mary Vijaya Kumari. 2023. "Spatial Distribution of the Fertility Parameters in Sericulture Soil: A Case Study of Dimapur District, Nagaland" Land 12, no. 5: 956. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12050956
APA StyleJigyasu, D. K., Kumar, A., Shabnam, A. A., Sharma, G. K., Jena, R. K., Das, B., Naik, V. S., Ahmed, S. A., & Kumari, K. M. V. (2023). Spatial Distribution of the Fertility Parameters in Sericulture Soil: A Case Study of Dimapur District, Nagaland. Land, 12(5), 956. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12050956