Next Article in Journal
A Geospatial Decision Support System for Supporting the Assessment of Land Degradation in Europe
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluating Urban Green Space Inequity to Promote Distributional Justice in Portland, Oregon
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Land Transfer-In on Crop Planting Structure and Its Heterogeneity among Farmers: Evidence from China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evolution Pattern and Spatial Mismatch of Urban Greenspace and Its Impact Mechanism: Evidence from Parkland of Hunan Province
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Participatory Design of Urban Green Spaces to Improve Residents’ Health

1
Maastricht Sustainability Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
2
Department of Environmental Sciences, Open Universiteit, 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands
3
Unit Medische Milieukunde, GGD Zuid Limburg, Het Overloon 2, 6411 TE Heerlen, The Netherlands
4
University College Venlo, System Earth Science Institute, Maastricht University, Nassaustraat 36, 5911 BV Venlo, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2024, 13(1), 88; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13010088
Submission received: 19 November 2023 / Revised: 21 December 2023 / Accepted: 4 January 2024 / Published: 11 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Urban Greenspace Planning, Design and Management)

Highlights

  • Spatial model assessment with a participatory process were combined in one approach;
  • Both ecosystem services and disservices for human health were considered;
  • Participant-generated green space designs result in a considerable self-assessed increase in use;
  • Model-assessed positive and negative health effects of green space designs are limited;
  • The combined approach produces clear outcomes regarding health benefits and use of designs.

Abstract

Urban green space (UGS) has important impacts on human health, but an integrated participatory approach to UGS design for improved residents’ health has been lacking to date. The aim of our study was to develop and evaluate such a novel approach to address this gap. The approach was developed following guiding principles from the literature and tested with groups of children and elderly as participants in two neighborhoods of Maastricht (The Netherlands) with a low score in economic and health indicators. The novel aspects of the approach are the inclusion of both positive and negative health effects, the combination of resident self-assessment and model-based assessment of the health effects of UGS designs, and the use of maps to visualize UGS designs and health effects. The participant-generated UGS designs resulted in a considerable (up to fourfold) self-assessed increase in the use of the UGSs for meeting, stress reduction, and leisure-based physical activity as compared to the current situation. The model-assessed positive and negative health effects of the participant-generated UGS designs were limited: heat stress slightly decreased (by 0.1 °C), active transport slightly increased (by 30 m per day), and the perceived unsafety slightly increased (8%). The effects on unattractive views, air pollution, tick bite risk, and traffic unsafety were negligible. The major strength of this approach is that it combines active participation of residents in UGS (re)design with assessment of the health effects of these UGS designs. While in other participatory approaches to UGS design, it often remains unclear whether the resulting designs represent an improvement in terms of health, our combination of computer model-based assessment and a participatory process produced clear outcomes regarding the health benefits and use of UGS designs. A major recommendation for improvement is to involve decision makers already in the initial steps of the approach.
Keywords: spatial model; urban green space; human health; ecosystem services; ecosystem disservices; participatory design; GIS; quantitative assessment spatial model; urban green space; human health; ecosystem services; ecosystem disservices; participatory design; GIS; quantitative assessment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oosterbroek, B.; de Kraker, J.; Akkermans, S.; Esser, P.; Martens, P. Participatory Design of Urban Green Spaces to Improve Residents’ Health. Land 2024, 13, 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13010088

AMA Style

Oosterbroek B, de Kraker J, Akkermans S, Esser P, Martens P. Participatory Design of Urban Green Spaces to Improve Residents’ Health. Land. 2024; 13(1):88. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13010088

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oosterbroek, Bram, Joop de Kraker, Sandra Akkermans, Paola Esser, and Pim Martens. 2024. "Participatory Design of Urban Green Spaces to Improve Residents’ Health" Land 13, no. 1: 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13010088

APA Style

Oosterbroek, B., de Kraker, J., Akkermans, S., Esser, P., & Martens, P. (2024). Participatory Design of Urban Green Spaces to Improve Residents’ Health. Land, 13(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13010088

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop