This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
How to Use Evidence Rules Reasonably to Resolve Land Disputes: Analysis of Typical Land Dispute Cases from China
by
Lingling Li
Lingling Li 1,
Haoran Gao
Haoran Gao 1,
Bingjie Song
Bingjie Song 2 and
Caixian Cui
Caixian Cui 1,*
1
School of Humanities and Social Development, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China
2
Centre for Regional Economies and Supply Chains, Central Queensland University, Mackay, QLD 4740, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2024, 13(8), 1187; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081187 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 5 June 2024
/
Revised: 19 July 2024
/
Accepted: 30 July 2024
/
Published: 1 August 2024
Abstract
Against the background of the integrated development of urban and rural areas in China, land disputes are gradually increasing and becoming a prominent focus of interest in current Chinese society. In the process of dispute settlement, it is challenging for land disputes to reconstruct the evidence chain with the help of systematic land evidence, and the information asymmetry between parties intensifies social contradictions. Currently, in the context of several research practices concerning evidence, China lacks a comprehensive and traditional system of integrated land evidence theory. Specific applicable rules for different types of land evidence can only be summarized by judicial referees. The challenge in the field of land evidence lies in establishing specific rules and addressing the issue of scattered individual rules. To overcome the challenges posed by various land evidence types and the difficulties in applying traditional evidence rules, we employ the land case analysis method to examine judicial judgment documents related to land disputes. This approach allows us to summarize the facts of land dispute cases, compare the judgments made in these cases and further highlight the similarities and differences in the land evidence considered by the referees. Through this process, this paper aims to establish a legally significant practical framework for the classification of land evidence, filling the theoretical gap in the operational mechanism of land evidence and unlocking the potential for applying evidence methods in land dispute resolution.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Li, L.; Gao, H.; Song, B.; Cui, C.
How to Use Evidence Rules Reasonably to Resolve Land Disputes: Analysis of Typical Land Dispute Cases from China. Land 2024, 13, 1187.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081187
AMA Style
Li L, Gao H, Song B, Cui C.
How to Use Evidence Rules Reasonably to Resolve Land Disputes: Analysis of Typical Land Dispute Cases from China. Land. 2024; 13(8):1187.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081187
Chicago/Turabian Style
Li, Lingling, Haoran Gao, Bingjie Song, and Caixian Cui.
2024. "How to Use Evidence Rules Reasonably to Resolve Land Disputes: Analysis of Typical Land Dispute Cases from China" Land 13, no. 8: 1187.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081187
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.