Next Article in Journal
Disturbance and Response Strategies of Carbon Sinks in Forest Land Due to Land Use Change: Taking Liushahe Town of Ningxiang as an Example
Previous Article in Journal
Impacts of Climate Change in China: Northward Migration of Isohyets and Reduction in Cropland
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Spatiotemporal Distribution of Cultural Heritage in Relation to Population and Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from the Ming-Qing Yangtze River Basin

College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2025, 14(7), 1416; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071416 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 9 June 2025 / Revised: 30 June 2025 / Accepted: 4 July 2025 / Published: 5 July 2025

Abstract

As a carrier of civilization, cultural heritage reflects the dynamic relationship between humans and their environment within specific historical contexts. During the Ming and Qing Dynasties (1368–1912 CE), the Yangtze River Basin was one of the most prominent regions for economic and cultural activities in ancient China. The cultural heritage of this period was characterized by its dense distribution and continuous evolution. Considering the applicability bias of modern data in historical interpretation, this study selected four characteristic variables: population density, agricultural productivity, technological level, and temperature anomaly. A hierarchical Bayesian model was constructed and change points were detected to quantitatively analyze the driving mechanisms behind the spatiotemporal distribution of cultural heritage. The results show the following: (1) The distribution of cultural heritage exhibited a multipolar trend by the mid-period in both Dynasties, with high-density areas contracting in the later period. (2) Agricultural productivity consistently had a significant positive impact, while population density also had a significant positive impact, except during the mid-Ming period. (3) The cultural calibration terms, which account for observational differences resulting from the interaction between cultural systems and environmental variables, exhibited slight variations. (4) The change point for population density was 364.83 people/km2, and for agricultural productivity it was 2.86 × 109 kJ/km2. This study confirms that the differentiation in the spatiotemporal distribution of cultural heritage is driven by the synergistic effects of population and resources. This provides a new perspective for researching human–land relations in a cross-cultural context.
Keywords: human–land relations; Bayesian model; machine learning; kernel density estimation; change point detection human–land relations; Bayesian model; machine learning; kernel density estimation; change point detection

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Bai, Y.; Li, W.; Chen, Q.; Du, X. Spatiotemporal Distribution of Cultural Heritage in Relation to Population and Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from the Ming-Qing Yangtze River Basin. Land 2025, 14, 1416. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071416

AMA Style

Liu Y, Bai Y, Li W, Chen Q, Du X. Spatiotemporal Distribution of Cultural Heritage in Relation to Population and Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from the Ming-Qing Yangtze River Basin. Land. 2025; 14(7):1416. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071416

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yuxi, Yu Bai, Wushuang Li, Qibing Chen, and Xinyu Du. 2025. "Spatiotemporal Distribution of Cultural Heritage in Relation to Population and Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from the Ming-Qing Yangtze River Basin" Land 14, no. 7: 1416. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071416

APA Style

Liu, Y., Bai, Y., Li, W., Chen, Q., & Du, X. (2025). Spatiotemporal Distribution of Cultural Heritage in Relation to Population and Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from the Ming-Qing Yangtze River Basin. Land, 14(7), 1416. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071416

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop