Next Article in Journal
Comparing Quantum Gravity Models: String Theory, Loop Quantum Gravity, and Entanglement Gravity versus SU(∞)-QGR
Next Article in Special Issue
A Qualitative Study on Second-Order Nonlinear Fractional Differential Evolution Equations with Generalized ABC Operator
Previous Article in Journal
Execution Time Prediction for Cypher Queries in the Neo4j Database Using a Learning Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Solution of the Sine-Gordon Equation by the Daftardar-Gejji and Jafari Method

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, Jadara University, Irbid 21110, Jordan
Symmetry 2022, 14(1), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14010057
Submission received: 27 November 2021 / Revised: 5 December 2021 / Accepted: 7 December 2021 / Published: 2 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry in Nonlinear and Convex Analysis)

Abstract

:
In this article, the Daftardar-Gejji and Jafari method (DJM) is used to obtain an approximate analytical solution of the sine-Gordon equation. Some examples are solved to demonstrate the accuracy of DJM. A comparison study between DJM, the variational iteration method (VIM), and the exact solution are presented. The comparison of the present symmetrical results with the existing literature is satisfactory.

1. Introduction

Differential equations are highly effective tools used to describe real-life phenomena; in most cases, the numerical or theoretical solutions are difficult to find. In recent years, searching for new methods to solve nonlinear differential equations has received increased attention, see [1,2,3].
In this paper, we will apply the Daftardar-Gejji and Jafari method (DJM) to find the solution of the sine-Gordon nonlinear equation:
u t t u x x + sin ( u ) = 0 .
In [4] Herbst et al. used an explicit symplectic method to find numerical results of the sine-Gordon equation. (Wazwaz, 2005) [5] Found new exact solutions to the sine-Gordon equation by using the tanh method. (Kaya, 2003) [6] presented the approximate analytical solution of the sine-Gordon equation by means of the modified decomposition method. (Ray, 2006) [7] applied the modified decomposition method to obtain the solution of coupled sine-Gordon equations. (Batiha et al., 2007) [8] applied the variational iteration method (VIM) to obtain an approximate analytical solution of the sine-Gordon equation.
The Daftardar–Gejji and Jafari method (DJM) was presented by Daftardar-Gejji and Jafari [9]; the DJM was used successfully for solving nonlinear differential equations, see references [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. DJM has been used to create a new predictor–corrector method [23,24]. In [25,26,27,28,29] Noor et al applied DJM to solve algebraic equations.
In this article, the analytical solution of the sine-Gordon Equation (1) is found by using the DJM. Comparisons with the variational iteration method (VIM) and the exact solution will be presented. The results obtained are symmetrical with VIM and exact solution results.

2. The Daftardar-Gejji and Jafari Method

In this paper, we will discuss the Daftardar-Gejji and Jafari method, and how to use it for solving nonlinear differential equations in the form:
y = f + L ( y ) + N ( y ) ,
where L, N are linear and non-linear operators, f is an arbitrary function. The above equation has a solution in the form:
y = i = 0 y i .
Suppose we have,
H 0 = N ( y 0 ) ,
H m = N i = 0 m y i N i = 0 m 1 y i .
Then we obtain,
H 0 = N ( y 0 ) ,
H 1 = N ( y 0 + y 1 ) N ( y 0 ) ,
H 2 = N ( y 0 + y 1 + y 2 ) N ( y 0 + y 1 ) ,
H 3 = N ( y 0 + y 1 + y 2 + y 3 ) N ( y 0 + y 1 + y 2 ) + .
Thus, N ( y ) is decomposed as:
N i = 0 y i = N ( y 0 ) + N ( y 0 + y 1 ) N ( y 0 ) + N ( y 0 + y 1 + y 2 ) N ( y 0 + y 1 ) + N ( y 0 + y 1 + y 2 + y 3 ) N ( y 0 + y 1 + y 2 ) + .
So, the recurrence relation is as the following form:
y 0 = f y 1 = L ( y 0 ) + H 0 y m + 1 = L ( y m ) + H m , m = 1 , 2 , .
Since L is linear, then:
i = 0 m L ( y i ) = L i = 0 m y i .
So,
i = 0 m + 1 y i = i = 0 m L ( y i ) + N i = 0 m y i . = L i = 0 m y i + N i = 0 m y i , m = 1 , 2 ,
Thus,
i = 0 y i = f + L i = 0 y i + N i = 0 y i .
We can form the solution in the k -term as follows:
y = i = 0 k 1 y i .

3. The Method Convergence

Theorem 1.
If N is C ( ) in a neighborhood of u 0 and | | N ( n ) ( u 0 ) | | L , for any n and for some real L > 0 and | | u i | | M < 1 e , i = 1 , 2 , , then n = 0 H n is convergent absolutely, | | H n | | L M n e n 1 ( e 1 ) , n = 1 , 2 , .
Proof. 
You can find the detailed proof in [14]. □
Theorem 2.
If N is C ( ) and | | N ( n ) ( u 0 ) | | M e 1 , n , then n = 0 H n is convergent absolutely.
Proof. 
You can find the detailed proof in [14]. □

4. Numerical Applications

Here, we will use DJM to find the solution of the sine-Gordon Equation (1).

4.1. Example 1

Example 1.
We will examine the pendulum-like equation in the form:
d 2 u d t 2 = sin u ,
u ( 0 ) = π , d u d t ( 0 ) = 2 .
The Equation (16) with initial conditions (17) arises from the sine-Gordon Equation (1) [30].
The implicit solution of Equations (16) and (17) was found to be [30]:
sin 1 2 u = sech t .
To solve Equation (16) by DJM, we integrate Equation (16) and use Equation (17) to obtain:
u = π 2 t + 0 t 0 t sin ( u ) d t d t .
By using algorithm (11) we obtain:
u 0 = π 2 t , u 1 = t / 2 1 / 4 sin 2 t ,
Thus,
i = 0 1 u i = π 3 t 2 sin ( 2 t ) 4 .
Which is the same result as [8] obtained by VIM.

4.2. Example 2

Example 2.
Here, consider the sine-Gordon Equation (1) with ICs: Note, we used Maple 18 with 16 digits.
u ( x , 0 ) = π + γ cos ( β x ) , u t ( x , 0 ) = 0 ,
where γ is any constant and β = 2 / 2 = 0.7071067811865475 .
The sine-Gordon Equation (1) with initial condition (21) is equivalent to the following integral equation:
u = π + γ cos β x + 0 t 0 t u x x sin ( u ) d t d t .
In view of the algorithm (11) we find:
u 0 = π + γ cos β x , u 1 = 1 / 2 γ cos β x β 2 + sin γ cos β x t 2 ,
Thus,
i = 0 1 u i = π + γ cos β x 1 / 2 γ cos β x β 2 sin γ cos β x t 2 .
Which is exactly the same result as [8] found by VIM.
To prove the stability of the DJM, we choose four γ values ( γ = 0.001 , γ = 0.05 , γ = 0.1 and γ = 1.0 ); these values were chosen by Batiha et al. [8]. Here, Equation (24) was used to draw the graphs in Figure 1.
Figure 1 shows the stability of DJM for different γ values, and the accuracy of DJM for solving the sine-Gordon equation.

4.3. Example 3

Example 3.
Here, obtain the solution of the sine-Gordon Equation (1) with ICs:
u ( x , 0 ) = 0 , u t ( x , 0 ) = 4 sech ( x ) .
The exact solution is:
u ( x , t ) = 4 tan 1 [ t sech ( x ) ] .
For solving Equation (1) by DJM, we integrate Equation (1) and use Equation (25) to obtain:
u = 4 t sech x + 0 t 0 t u x x sin ( u ) d t d t .
By using algorithm (11) we find:
u 0 = 4 t s u 1 = 64 t 3 s 3 tanh x 2 32 t 3 s 3 12 cosh x s 2 t + 3 sin 4 t s 48 s 2 .
where s = sech ( x ) , thus:
i = 0 1 u i = 4 t s + 64 t 3 s 3 tanh x 2 32 t 3 s 3 12 cosh x s 2 t + 3 sin 4 t s 48 s 2 .
This is exactly the same result as Batiha et al. [8] obtained by VIM. In Figure 2 we show the comparisons between one iteration DJM and the exact solution (26). Figure 2 clearly shows the excellent accuracy of DJM compared to the exact solution.

5. Conclusions

In this article, the DJM was used to obtain the solutions of the sine-Gordon equation with remarkable success. Comparisons with the variation iteration method (VIM) and the exact solution show that DJM is a very promising technique for solving nonlinear partial differential equations. In future research, DJM should be used to solve fractional differential equations.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, X.Y. Exact and explicit solitary wave solutions for the generalized Fisher equation. J. Phys. Lett. A 1988, 131, 277–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wadati, M. The exact solution of the modified Korteweg-de Vries equation. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1972, 32, 1681–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nayak, M.K.; Wakif, A.; Animasaun, I.L.; Alaoui, M.S.H. Numerical Differential Quadrature Examination of Steady Mixed Convection Nanofluid Flows over an Isothermal Thin Needle Conveying Metallic and Metallic Oxide Nanomaterials: A Comparative Investigation. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2020, 45, 5331–5346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Herbst, B.M.; Ablowitz, M.J. Numerical homoclinic instabilities in the sine-Gordon equation. Quaest. Math. 1992, 15, 345–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wazwaz, A.M. The tanh method: Exact solutions of the sine-Gordon and the sinh-Gordon equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2005, 167, 1196–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kaya, D. A numerical solution of the sine-Gordon equation using the modified decomposition method. Appl. Math. Comput. 2003, 143, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ray, S.S. A numerical solution of the coupled sine-Gordon equation using the modified decomposition method. Appl. Math. Comput. 2006, 175, 1046–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Batiha, B.; Noorani, M.S.M.; Hashim, I. Numerical solution of sine-Gordon equation by variational iteration method. Phys. Lett. A 2007, 370, 437–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Daftardar-Gejji, V.; Jafari, H. An iterative method for solving nonlinear functional equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2006, 316, 753–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Daftardar-Gejji, V.; Bhalekar, S. An Iterative method for solving fractional differential equations. PAMM Proc. Appl. Math. 2007, 7, 2050017–2050018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bhalekar, S.; Daftardar-Gejji, V. New iterative method: Application to partial differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2008, 203, 778–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Daftardar-Gejji, V.; Bhalekar, S. Solving Fractional Diffusion-Wave Equations Using a New Iterative Method. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2008, 11, 193–202. [Google Scholar]
  13. Daftardar-Gejji, V.; Bhalekar, S. Solving fractional boundary value problems with Dirichlet boundary conditions using a new iterative method. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 59, 1801–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Bhalekar, S.; Daftardar-Gejji, V. Convergence of the New Iterative Method. Int. J. Differ. Equ. 2011, 2011, 989065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mohyud-Din, S.T.; Yildirim, A. Syed Mohammad Mahdi Hosseini, Numerical Comparison of Methods for Hirota-Satsuma Model. Appl. Appl. Math. 2010, 5, 1558–1567. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mohyud-Din, S.T.; Yildirim, A.; Hosseini, M.M. An Iterative Algorithm for Fifth-order Boundary Value Problems. World Appl. Sci. J. 2010, 8, 531–535. [Google Scholar]
  17. Srivastava, V.; Rai, K.N. A multi-term fractional diffusion equation for oxygen delivery through a capillary to tissues. Math. Comput. Model. 2010, 51, 616–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fard, O.S.; Sanchooli, M. Two Successive Schemes for Numerical Solution of Linear Fuzzy Fredholm Integral Equations of the Second Kind. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2010, 4, 817–825. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bhalekar, S.; Daftardar-Gejji, V. Solving evolution equations using a new iterative method. Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 2010, 26, 906–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghori, M.B.; Usman, M.; Mohyud-Din, S.T. Numerical studies for solving a predictive microbial growth model using a new iterative Method. Int. J. Mod. Biol. Med. 2014, 5, 33–39. [Google Scholar]
  21. Patade, J.; Bhalekar, S. A new numerical method based on Daftardar-Gejji and Jafari technique for solving differential equations. World J. Model. Simul. 2015, 11, 256–271. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bakodah, H.O.; Ebaid, A. Exact solution of Ambartsumian delay differential equation and comparison with Daftardar-Gejji and Jafari approximate method. Mathematics 2018, 6, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Daftardar-Gejji, V.; Sukale, Y.; Bhalekar, S. A new predictor-corrector method for fractional differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2014, 244, 158–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Daftardar-Gejji, V.; Sukale, Y.; Bhalekar, S. Solving fractional delay differential equations: A new approach. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2015, 16, 400–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Noor, M.A.; Noor, K.I. Three-step iterative methods for nonlinear equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2006, 183, 322–327. [Google Scholar]
  26. Noor, M.A. New iterative schemes for nonlinear equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 187, 937–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Noor, K.I.; Noor, M.A. Iterative methods with fourth-order convergence for nonlinear equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 189, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Noor, M.A.; Mohyud-Din, S.T. An Iterative Method for Solving Helmholtz Equations. Arab. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2007, 1, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
  29. Noor, M.A.; Noor, K.I.; Al-Said, E.; Waseem, M. Some New Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations. Math. Probl. Eng. 2010, 2010, 198943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Deeba, E.Y.; Khuri, S.A. A Decomposition Method for Solving the Nonlinear Klein–Gordon Equation. J. Comput. Phys. 1996, 124, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The numerical results for the sine-Gordon Equation (1) by means of one iteration DJM for (a) γ = 0.001 , (b) γ = 0.05 , (c) γ = 0.1 and (d) γ = 1.0 .
Figure 1. The numerical results for the sine-Gordon Equation (1) by means of one iteration DJM for (a) γ = 0.001 , (b) γ = 0.05 , (c) γ = 0.1 and (d) γ = 1.0 .
Symmetry 14 00057 g001aSymmetry 14 00057 g001b
Figure 2. (a) One iteration of DJM and (b) The exact solution.
Figure 2. (a) One iteration of DJM and (b) The exact solution.
Symmetry 14 00057 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Batiha, B. New Solution of the Sine-Gordon Equation by the Daftardar-Gejji and Jafari Method. Symmetry 2022, 14, 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14010057

AMA Style

Batiha B. New Solution of the Sine-Gordon Equation by the Daftardar-Gejji and Jafari Method. Symmetry. 2022; 14(1):57. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14010057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Batiha, Belal. 2022. "New Solution of the Sine-Gordon Equation by the Daftardar-Gejji and Jafari Method" Symmetry 14, no. 1: 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14010057

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop