Next Article in Journal
Unified Integrals of Generalized Mittag–Leffler Functions and Their Graphical Numerical Investigation
Next Article in Special Issue
Certain Generalizations of Quadratic Transformations of Hypergeometric and Generalized Hypergeometric Functions
Previous Article in Journal
Josephson-like Oscillations in Toroidal Spinor Bose–Einstein Condensates: A Prospective Symmetry Probe
Previous Article in Special Issue
Certain Integral Formulae Associated with the Product of Generalized Hypergeometric Series and Several Elementary Functions Derived from Formulas for the Beta Function
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Another Method for Proving Certain Reduction Formulas for the Humbert Function ψ2 Due to Brychkov et al. with an Application

1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, El-Sheik Zayed 41522, Ismailia, Egypt
2
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Institute of Mathematical Research, University Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
3
Department of Mathematics, College of Sciences and Humanities in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Mathematics, Vedant College of Engineering & Technology, Rajasthan Technical University, Tulsi, Jakhmund, Bundi 323021, Rajasthan State, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2022, 14(5), 868; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14050868
Submission received: 15 February 2022 / Revised: 13 March 2022 / Accepted: 15 March 2022 / Published: 23 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Special Functions and Their Applications)

Abstract

:
Recently, Brychkov et al. established several new and interesting reduction formulas for the Humbert functions (the confluent hypergeometric functions of two variables). The primary objective of this study was to provide an alternative and simple approach for proving four reduction formulas for the Humbert function ψ 2 . We construct intriguing series comprising the product of two confluent hypergeometric functions as an application. Numerous intriguing new and previously known outcomes are also achieved as specific instances of our primary discoveries. It is well-known that the hypergeometric functions in one and two variables and their confluent forms occur naturally in a wide variety of problems in applied mathematics, statistics, operations research, physics (theoretical and mathematical) and engineering mathematics, so the results established in this paper may be potentially useful in the above fields. Symmetry arises spontaneously in the abovementioned functions.

1. Introduction

The generalized hyper geometric function p F q is defined by [1,2]:
p F q a 1 , , a p ; z b 1 , , b q = n = 0 a 1 n a p n b 1 n b q n z n n !
where ( a ) n denotes the well known Pochhammer symbol (or the shifted or the raised factorial, since ( 1 ) n = n ! ) defined for any complex number ( a 0 ) by
( a ) n : = Γ ( a + n ) Γ ( a ) = a ( a + 1 ) ( a + n 1 ) ; n N 1 ; n = 0
It is interesting to mention here that symmetry occurs in the numerator parameters a 1 , a 2 , , a p and also symmetry occurs in the denominator parameters b 1 , b 2 , , b q of the generalized hypergeometric function
p F q a 1 , , a p ; z b 1 , , b q .
That means that every reordering of the numerator parameters a 1 , a 2 , , a p of the generalized hypergeometric function provides the same function, and every reordering of the denominator parameters b 1 , b 2 , , b q of the generalized hypergeometric function produces the same function.
Additionally, the Humbert function ψ 2 (confluent form of the well-known Appell function of two variables) is defined by the following series [3,4]:
ψ 2 ( α 1 ; β 1 , β 2 ; z 1 , z 2 ) = k = 0 m = 0 ( α 1 ) k + m z 1 k z 2 m ( β 1 ) k ( β 2 ) m m ! k ! ,
which converges absolutely at any z 1 , z 2 C .
For some elementary relations between the Humbert function ψ 2 and the generalized hypergeometric function, we refer to [5,6]. Additionally, it is to be noted here that the symmetry occurs naturally in the denominator parameters β 1 and β 2 .
The integral representation of the Humbert function ψ 2 is given by:
ψ 2 ( a ; c , c ; x , y ) = 1 Γ ( a ) 0 e t t a 1 0 F 1 ; x t c 0 F 1 ; y t c d t .
The following expression for the Humbert function ψ 2 is given by Makano [7]:
ψ 2 ( a ; c , c ; ω , z ) = m = 0 ( a ) m ω m ( c ) m m ! 2 F 1 m , m c + 1 ; z ω c .
On the other hand, the classical Kummer summation theorem for the series 2 F 1 is given by [1,2]:
2 F 1 a , b ; 1 1 + a b = Γ 1 + 1 2 a Γ ( 1 + a b ) Γ ( 1 + a ) Γ 1 + 1 2 a b .
By employing (6), Bailey [8] obtained the following two interesting results involving the product of two generalized hypergeometric functions viz.
0 F 1 ; x c 0 F 1 ; x c = 0 F 3 ; x 2 4 c , 1 2 c , 1 2 c + 1 2 ,
and
0 F 1 ; x c 0 F 1 ; x 2 c = 0 F 3 ; x 2 4 1 2 , 1 2 c + 1 2 , 3 2 1 2 c + 2 ( 1 c ) x c ( 2 c ) 0 F 3 ; x 2 4 3 2 , 1 2 c + 1 , 2 1 2 c .
In 2011, Rakha and Rathie [9] established the following generalizations of the classical Kummer summation theorem (6) in the most general form for any i Z 0 viz.
2 F 1 a , b ; 1 1 + a b + i = 2 a Γ 1 2 Γ ( b i ) Γ ( 1 + a b + i ) Γ ( b ) Γ 1 2 a b + 1 2 i + 1 2 Γ 1 2 a b + 1 2 i + 1 × r = 0 i i r ( 1 ) r Γ 1 2 a b + 1 2 i + 1 2 r + 1 2 Γ 1 2 a 1 2 i + 1 2 r + 1 2 ,
and
2 F 1 a , b ; 1 1 + a b i = 2 a Γ 1 2 Γ ( 1 + a b + i ) Γ 1 2 a b + 1 2 i + 1 2 Γ 1 2 a b + 1 2 i + 1 × r = 0 i i r ( 1 ) r Γ 1 2 a b 1 2 i + 1 2 r + 1 2 Γ 1 2 a 1 2 i + 1 2 r + 1 2 .
Clearly, for i = 0 , the results (9) and (10) reduce to (6).
Very recently, by employing (9) and (10), Rathie et al. [10] established the following general results involving product of generalized hypergeometric functions viz.
0 F 1 ; x c 0 F 1 ; x c + i = k 1 r = 0 i i r ( 1 ) r Γ c + 1 2 i + 1 2 r 1 2 Γ 1 2 + 1 2 r 1 2 i × 2 F 5 c + 1 2 r + 1 2 i 1 2 , 1 2 1 2 r + 1 2 i ; x 2 4 1 2 , 1 2 c + 1 2 i , 1 2 c + 1 2 i + 1 2 , c + 1 2 i 1 2 , c + 1 2 i + k 2 x r = 0 i i r ( 1 ) r Γ c + 1 2 i + 1 2 r Γ 1 2 r 1 2 i × 2 F 5 c + 1 2 r + 1 2 i , 1 1 2 r + 1 2 i ; x 2 4 3 2 , 1 2 c + 1 2 i + 1 2 , 1 2 c + 1 2 i + 1 , c + 1 2 i , c + 1 2 i + 1 2 ,
where
k 1 = Γ 1 2 Γ ( c + i ) Γ ( 1 c i ) Γ ( 1 c ) Γ c + 1 2 i Γ c + 1 2 1 2 ,
and
k 2 = 2 Γ 1 2 Γ ( c + i ) Γ ( c i ) x Γ ( 1 c ) Γ c + 1 2 i Γ c + 1 2 + 1 2 ,
0 F 1 ; x c 0 F 1 ; x c i = k 3 r = 0 i i r Γ c + 1 2 r 1 2 i 1 2 Γ 1 2 r 1 2 i + 1 2 × 2 F 5 c + 1 2 r 1 2 i 1 2 , 1 2 1 2 r + 1 2 i ; x 2 4 1 2 , 1 2 c , 1 2 c + 1 2 , c 1 2 i , c 1 2 i 1 2 + k 4 x r = 0 i i r ( 1 ) r Γ c + 1 2 r 1 2 i Γ 1 2 r 1 2 i × 2 F 5 c + 1 2 r 1 2 i , 1 1 2 r + 1 2 i ; x 2 4 3 2 , 1 2 c + 1 2 , 1 2 c + 1 , c 1 2 i , c 1 2 i + 1 2 ,
where
k 3 = Γ 1 2 Γ ( c i ) Γ c 1 2 i Γ c 1 2 i 1 2 ,
and
k 4 = 2 Γ 1 2 Γ ( c i ) c Γ c 1 2 i Γ c 1 2 i + 1 2 .
0 F 1 ; x c 0 F 1 ; x 2 c + i = ( 2 ) i i ! r = 0 i ( 1 ) r i r Γ 1 1 2 c + 1 2 r + 1 2 i Γ 1 1 2 c + 1 2 r 1 2 i × 3 F 6 1 , 1 1 2 c + 1 2 i + 1 2 r , 1 2 c + 1 2 i 1 2 r ; x 2 4 1 2 c , 1 2 c + 1 2 , 1 2 i + 1 2 , 1 2 i + 1 , 1 1 2 c + 1 2 i , 3 2 1 2 c + 1 2 i + 4 ( 2 ) i x ( i + 1 ) ! c ( 2 c + i ) r = 0 i ( 1 ) r i r Γ 1 2 c + 1 2 r + 1 2 i + 3 2 Γ 1 2 c + 1 2 r 1 2 i + 1 2 × 3 F 6 1 , 1 2 c + 1 2 i + 1 2 r + 3 2 , 1 2 c + 1 2 i 1 2 r + 1 2 ; x 2 4 1 2 c + 1 2 , 1 2 c + 1 , 1 2 i + 1 , 1 2 i + 3 2 , 3 2 1 2 c + 1 2 i , 2 1 2 c + 1 2 i ,
0 F 1 ; x c 0 F 1 ; x 2 c i = ( 2 ) i r = 0 i i r × 2 F 5 1 2 c + 1 2 i 1 2 r , 1 1 2 c 1 2 i + 1 2 r ; x 2 4 1 2 , 1 2 c , 1 2 c + 1 2 , 1 1 2 c 1 2 i , 3 2 1 2 c 1 2 i + ( 2 ) 1 i x c ( 2 c i ) r = 0 i i r ( 1 + r i c ) × 2 F 5 3 2 1 2 c 1 2 i + 1 2 r , 1 2 + 1 2 c + 1 2 i 1 2 r ; x 2 4 3 2 , 1 2 c + 1 2 , 1 2 c + 1 , 3 2 1 2 c 1 2 i , 2 1 2 c 1 2 i .
Remark 1.
For i = 0 , the results (11) or (12) reduce to (7) and the results (13) or (14) reduce to (8).
In 2017, by employing result (5) and with the help of (9) and (10), Brychkov, et al. [5] established the following four interesting and general reduction formulas for the Humbert function ψ 2 .
1.
For c 0 , 1 , 2 , and n = 0 , 1 , 2 , , the following result holds true:
ψ 2 ( a ; c , c + n ; z , z ) = ( 1 ) n 2 2 c + n 2 Γ ( c ) Γ ( 2 c + n ) k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k × ( 2 c + n 1 ) Γ c + k + n 1 2 Γ k n + 1 2 4 F 5 a 2 , a + 1 2 , n k + 1 2 , n + k 1 2 ; z 2 1 2 , c + n 2 , c + n + 1 2 , c + n 1 2 , c + n 2 + 4 a z Γ c + k + n 2 ( c + n ) Γ k n 2 4 F 5 a + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 , n k 2 + 1 , c + n + k 2 ; z 2 3 2 , c + n + 1 2 , c + n 2 + 1 , c + n 2 , c + n + 1 2 = Δ 1 .
2.
For c , c n 0 , 1 , 2 , and n = 0 , 1 , 2 , , the following result holds true:
ψ 2 ( a ; c , c n ; z , z ) = 2 2 c n 2 Γ ( c n ) Γ ( 2 c n ) k = 0 n n k × ( 2 c n 1 ) Γ c + k n 1 2 Γ k n + 1 2 4 F 5 a 2 , a + 1 2 , n k + 1 2 , k n 1 2 ; z 2 1 2 , c 2 , c + 1 2 , c n 2 , c + n + 1 2 + 4 a z Γ c + k n 2 c Γ k n 2 4 F 5 a + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 , n k 2 + 1 , c + k n 2 ; z 2 3 2 , c + 1 2 , c 2 + 1 , c n 2 , c n 1 2 = Δ 2 .
3.
For c 0 , 1 , 2 , and n = 0 , 1 , 2 , , the following result holds true:
ψ 2 ( a ; c , 2 c + n ; z , z ) = ( 2 ) n n ! k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k × ( 2 c + n 1 ) Γ k c + n 2 + 1 Γ k c n 2 + 1 5 F 6 1 , a 2 , a + 1 2 , c + n k 2 , n c + k 2 + 1 ; z 2 n + 1 2 , n 2 + 1 , c 2 , c + 1 2 , n c 2 + 1 , n c + 3 2 + 4 a z Γ n c + k + 3 2 c ( n + 1 ) ( 2 c + n ) Γ k c n + 1 2 × 5 F 6 1 , a + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 , c + n k + 1 2 , n c + k + 3 2 ; z 2 n 2 + 1 , n + 3 2 , c + 1 2 , c 2 + 1 , n c + 3 2 , n c 2 + 2 = Δ 3 .
4.
For c , 2 c n 0 , 1 , 2 , and n = 0 , 1 , 2 , , the following result holds true:
ψ 2 ( a ; c , 2 c n ; z , z ) = 2 n k = 0 n n k 4 F 5 a 2 , a + 1 2 , c + n k 2 , k n c 2 + 1 ; z 2 1 2 , c 2 , c + 1 2 , 1 c + n 2 , 3 c n 2 + 2 a ( c k + n 1 ) z c ( c + n 2 ) 4 F 5 a + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 , c + n k + 1 2 , k n c + 3 2 ; z 2 3 2 , c + 1 2 , c 2 + 1 , 3 c n 2 , 2 c + n 2 = Δ 4 .
If c = 0 , the result (15) or (16) reduces to:
ψ 2 ( a ; c , c ; x , x ) = 2 F 3 a 2 , a + 1 2 ; x 2 c , c 2 , c + 1 2 .
Moreover, the following interesting series containing the product of a confluent hypergeometric function available in the literature [2] can be obtained by (19):
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k = 2 F 3 a 2 , a + 1 2 ; x 2 b , b 2 , b + 1 2 .
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we provide another method for proving the results (15) to (18). As an application of these results, in Section 3, we shall establish the explicit expressions of the following general series identities containing product of confluent hypergeometric functions of the form for any i Z 0 viz.
(a)
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( b + i ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k + i
(b)
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( b i ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k i
(c)
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( 2 b + i ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b 2 + k + i
(d)
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( 2 b i ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b 2 + k i
And, in Section 4, we shall discuss several interesting special cases of our main findings.

2. Derivations of the Results (15) to (18) by Another Method

In this section, we shall establish results (15) to (18) by another method. In order to reach result (15), we proceed as follows. In result (15), we replace x by x t and then multiply both sides by e t t a 1 and, interesting with respect to t in the interval [ 0 , ) , we have:
0 e t t a 1 0 F 1 ; x t c 0 F 1 ; x t c + i d t = k 1 r = 0 i ( 1 ) r i r Γ c + 1 2 r + 1 2 i 1 2 Γ 1 2 + 1 2 r 1 2 i 0 e t t a 1 × 2 F 5 c + 1 2 r + 1 2 i 1 2 , 1 2 1 2 r + 1 2 i ; x 2 t 2 4 1 2 , 1 2 c + 1 2 i , 1 2 c + 1 2 i + 1 2 , c + 1 2 i 1 2 , c + 1 2 i d t + k 2 x r = 0 i ( 1 ) r i r Γ c + 1 2 r + 1 2 i Γ 1 2 r 1 2 i 0 e t t a × 2 F 5 c + 1 2 r + 1 2 i , 1 1 2 r + 1 2 i ; x 2 t 2 4 3 2 , 1 2 c + 1 2 i + 1 2 , 1 2 c + 1 2 i + 1 , c + 1 2 i , c + 1 2 i + 1 2 d t
Now, if we denote the left-hand side of (21) by S 1 , then:
S 1 = 0 e t t a 1 0 F 1 ; x t c 0 F 1 ; x t c + i d t
Expressing both 0 F 1 as series, we change the order of integration and series (which is easily seen to be justified due to the uniform convergence of the series in the interval [ 0 , ) ; evaluating the gamma integral and making use of identity (2) and finally summing up the double series, we have:
S 1 = Γ ( a ) ψ 2 ( a ; c , c + i ; x , x ) .
Next, if we denote the right-hand side of (21) by S 2 , and then we have:
S 2 = A I 1 + B I 2 ,
where
A = k 1 r = 0 i ( 1 ) r i r Γ c + 1 2 r + 1 2 i 1 2 Γ 1 2 + 1 2 r 1 2 i , B = k 2 x r = 0 i ( 1 ) r i r Γ c + 1 2 r + 1 2 i Γ 1 2 r 1 2 i , I 1 = 0 e t t a 1 × 2 F 5 c + 1 2 r + 1 2 i 1 2 , 1 2 1 2 r + 1 2 i ; x 2 t 2 4 1 2 , 1 2 c + 1 2 i , 1 2 c + 1 2 i + 1 2 , c + 1 2 i 1 2 , c + 1 2 i d t ,
and
I 2 = 0 e t t a × 2 F 5 c + 1 2 r + 1 2 i , 1 1 2 r + 1 2 i ; x 2 t 2 4 3 2 , 1 2 c + 1 2 i + 1 2 , 1 2 c + 1 2 i + 1 , c + 1 2 i , c + 1 2 i + 1 2 d t
Evaluation of I 1 : Expressing 2 F 1 as a series, changing the order of integration and summation, evaluating the gamma integral and using the identities (2) and
( a ) 2 n = 2 2 n 1 2 a n 1 2 a + 1 2 n
then, after some simplification, summing up the series, we obtain:
I 1 = Γ ( a ) 4 F 5 1 2 a , 1 2 a + 1 2 , c + 1 2 r + 1 2 i 1 2 , 1 2 1 2 r + 1 2 i ; x 2 1 2 , 1 2 c + 1 2 i , 1 2 c + 1 2 i + 1 2 , c + 1 2 i 1 2 , c + 1 2 i
Evaluation of I 2 : Proceeding on similar lines as in the case of evaluation of I 1 , it is not difficult to see that:
I 2 = a Γ ( a ) 4 F 5 1 2 a + 1 2 , 1 2 a + 1 , c + 1 2 i + 1 2 , 1 2 1 2 r + 1 2 i ; x 2 3 2 , 1 2 c + 1 2 i + 1 2 , 1 2 c + 1 2 i + 1 , c + 1 2 i , c + 1 2 i + 1 2
Finally, upon substituting the expressions for A , B , I 1 and I 2 in (23) and equating (22) and (23), we obtain our first result, (15). In exactly the same manner, results (16) to (18) can be established. We, however, prefer to omit the details. We conclude this section by remarking that the application of results (15) to (18) is given in the next section.

3. General Series Identities Containing the Product of Confluent Hypergeometric Functions

In this section, we shall establish the following four general series identities containing the product of confluent hypergeometric functions asserted in the following theorem.
Theorem 1.
For any i Z 0 , the following results hold true.
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( b + i ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k + i = Δ 1 ,
where Δ 1 is the same as the right-hand side of (15).
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( b i ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k i = Δ 2 ,
where Δ 2 is the same as the right-hand side of (16).
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( 2 b + i ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x 2 b + k + i = Δ 3 ,
where Δ 3 is the same as the right-hand side of (17).
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( 2 b i ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x 2 b + k i = Δ 4 ,
where Δ 4 is the same as the right-hand side of (18).
Proof. 
In order to establish the first general series identity (24) asserted in the theorem, we proceed as follows. Denoting the left-hand side of (24) by S, we have:
S = k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( b + i ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k + i
Expressing both confluent hypergeometric functions as series, we have after some arrangement:
S = m = 0 n = 0 k = 0 ( 1 ) k + n ( a ) k ( a + k ) m ( a ) k ( a + k ) n x 2 k + m + n ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( b + k ) m ( b + i ) k ( b + k + i ) n m ! n !
using the identity
( a ) k ( a + k ) m = ( a ) k + m ,
we have:
S = m = 0 n = 0 k = 0 ( 1 ) k + n ( a ) k + m ( a ) k + n x 2 k + m + n ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k + m ( b + i ) k + n m ! n !
Now replacing m by m k and n by n k and using the result [[9], equ.(1), p.56]
n = 0 k = 0 A ( n , k ) = n = 0 k = 0 n A ( k , n k ) ,
we have
S = m = 0 n = 0 k = 0 m i n ( m , n ) ( 1 ) n ( a ) m ( a ) n x m + n ( a ) k k ! ( b ) m ( b + i ) n ( m k ) ! ( n k ) !
Now if we use the identities
( α ) m n = ( 1 ) n ( α ) m ( 1 α m ) n ,
and
( m n ) ! = ( 1 ) n m ! ( m ) n ,
we have, after some simplification:
S = m = 0 n = 0 ( 1 ) n ( a ) m ( a ) n x m + n ( b ) m ( b + i ) n m ! n ! k = 0 m i n ( m , n ) ( m ) k ( n ) k ( a ) k k !
Summing up the inner series, we have:
S = m = 0 n = 0 ( 1 ) n ( a ) m ( a ) n x m + n ( b ) m ( b + i ) n m ! n ! 2 F 1 m , n ; 1 a .
Using Gauss’s summation theorem
2 F 1 a , b ; 1 c = Γ ( c ) Γ ( c a b ) Γ ( c a ) Γ ( c b ) ,
provided R e ( c a b ) > 0 , and using identity (2), we have:
S = m = 0 n = 0 ( 1 ) n ( a ) m + n ( a ) n x m + n ( b ) m ( b + i ) n m ! n !
and, using definition (3), we have:
S = ψ 2 ( a ; c , c + i ; x , x )
Finally, using result (15), we easily arrive at the right-hand side of our first general series identity (24).
In exactly the same manner, the other series identities (25) to (27) can be established. □

4. Corollaries

In this section, we shall mention some of the very interesting special cases of our four general series identities (24) to (27).
Corollary 1.
In (24) or (25), if we set i = 0 , we obtain a known series identity (20) available in the literature.
Corollary 2.
In (24), if we take i = 1 , 2 ; we obtain the following results:
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( b + 1 ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k + 1 = 2 F 3 a 2 , a + 1 2 ; x 2 b , b 2 + 1 2 , b 2 + 1 + a x b ( b + 1 ) 2 F 3 a + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 ; x 2 b + 1 , b 2 + 1 , b + 3 2 ,
and
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( b + 2 ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k + 2 = 2 F 3 a 2 , a + 1 2 ; x 2 b + 1 , b 2 + 1 , b 2 + 3 2 + 2 a x b ( b + 2 ) 2 F 3 a + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 ; x 2 b + 1 , b 2 + 3 2 , b 2 + 2 .
Similarly, other results can be obtained.
Corollary 3.
In (25), if we take i = 1 , 2 ; we obtain the following results:
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( b 1 ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 = 2 F 3 a 2 , a + 1 2 ; x 2 b 1 , b 2 , b 2 + 1 2 a x b ( b 1 ) 2 F 3 a + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 ; x 2 b , b 2 , b 2 + 1 2 ,
and
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( b 2 ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 2 = 2 F 3 a 2 , a + 1 2 ; x 2 b 1 , b 2 , b 2 + 1 2 2 a x b ( b 2 ) 2 F 3 a + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 ; x 2 b 1 , b 2 + 1 2 , b 2 + 1 .
Similarly, other results can be obtained.
Corollary 4.
In (26) or (27), if we set i = 0 , we obtain the following results:
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( 2 b ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x 2 b + k = 2 F 3 a 2 , a + 1 2 ; x 2 1 2 , b 2 + 1 2 , 3 2 1 2 b + 2 a x ( 1 b ) b ( 2 b ) 2 F 3 a + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 ; x 2 3 2 , b 2 + 1 , 2 b 2 .
Corollary 5.
In (26), if we take i = 1 , 2 , we obtain the following results:
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( 3 b ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x 3 b + k = ( 2 b ) 2 F 3 a 2 , a + 1 2 ; x 2 3 2 , b 2 + 1 2 , 3 2 1 2 b ( 1 b ) 2 F 3 a 2 , a 2 + 1 2 ; x 2 3 2 , b 2 , 2 b 2 + a ( 2 b ) x ( 3 b ) 3 F 4 1 , a 2 + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 ; x 2 2 , 3 2 , b 2 + 1 2 , 5 2 b 2 + a ( 1 b ) x b 3 F 4 1 , a 2 + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 ; x 2 2 , 3 2 , b 2 + 1 , 2 b 2 ,
and
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( 4 b ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x 4 b + k = ( 2 b ) 2 3 F 4 1 , a 2 , a + 1 2 ; x 2 2 , 3 2 , b 2 + 1 2 , 5 2 1 2 b ( 1 b ( 3 b ) ) 3 F 4 1 , a 2 , a + 1 2 ; x 2 2 , 3 2 , b 2 , 2 1 2 b + 2 ( 1 b ) ( 2 b ) ( 3 b ) a x 3 b ( 4 b ) 3 F 4 1 , a 2 + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 ; x 2 2 , 5 2 , b 2 + 1 , 3 b 2 + 2 a ( 2 b ) x b 3 F 4 1 , a 2 + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 ; x 2 2 , 5 2 , b 2 + 1 2 , 5 2 b 2 .
Similarly, other results can be obtained.
Corollary 6.
In (27), if we take i = 1 , 2 , we obtain the following results:
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( 1 b ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x 1 b + k = 1 2 2 F 3 a 2 , a + 1 2 ; x 2 1 2 , b 2 , 1 b 2 + 1 2 2 F 3 a 2 , a 2 + 1 2 ; x 2 1 2 , b 2 + 1 2 , 1 2 b 2 a x 1 b 2 F 3 a 2 + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 ; x 2 3 2 , b 2 + 1 2 , 3 2 b 2 + a x b 2 F 3 a 2 + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 ; x 2 3 2 , b 2 + 1 , 1 b 2 ,
and
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( a ) k k ! ( b ) k ( b ) k x 2 k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k 1 F 1 a + k ; x b + k = 1 2 2 F 3 a 2 , a + 1 2 ; x 2 1 2 , b 2 + 1 2 , 1 2 b 2 + 1 2 2 F 3 a 2 , a 2 + 1 2 ; x 2 1 2 , b 2 , b 2 + a x b 2 F 3 a 2 + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 ; x 2 3 2 , b 2 + 1 2 , 1 2 b 2 + a x b 2 F 3 a 2 + 1 2 , a 2 + 1 ; x 2 3 2 , b 2 + 1 , 1 b 2 .
Similarly, other results can be obtained.

5. Concluding Remark

In the beginning of the paper, we have provided another method for the derivation of the four reduction formulas for the Humbert functions obtained recently by Brychkov et al. Our method of derivation is simpler than the method given by Brychkov et al. Next, we applied these results to obtain four general results for the series involving the product of two confluent hypergeometric functions. In the end we mentioned known as well as new special cases of our main findings. The hypergeometric functions in one and two variables and their confluent forms occur naturally in a wide variety of problems in applied mathematics, statistics, operations research, theoretical and mathematical physics and engineering mathematics, as well as applications in such diverse fields as mechanics of deformable media, communications engineering, perturbation theory, theory of heat conduction, integral equations, theory of Lie algebra and Lie groups, decision theory, theory of elasticity and statistical distributions theory. Therefore, the results established in this paper may be potentially useful in the abovementioned areas.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft: A.O.M., A.K., M.M.A., A.K.R. and M.A.R.; writing—review and editing: A.O.M., A.K., M.M.A., A.K.R. and M.A.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (grant number FRGS/2/2014/SG04/UPM/01/1) for the financial support in this research. Funding: Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia grant number FRGS/2/2014/SG04/UPM/01/1.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bailey, W.N. Generalized Hypergeometric Series, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics and Mathematical Physics; Stechert-Hafner, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rainville, E.D. Special Functions; Macmillan Company: New York, NY, USA, 1960; Reprinted by Chelsea Publishing Company: New York, NY, USA, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  3. Humbert, P. The confluent hypergeometric functions of two variables. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 1922, 41, 73–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Appell, A.; Kampé de Fériet, J. Fonctions hypergeometrique. In Polynomes d’Hermite; Gauthier-Villars: Paris, France, 1926. [Google Scholar]
  5. Brychkov, Y.A.; Kim, Y.S.; Rathie, A.K. On new reduction formulas for the Humbert functions Ψ2, Φ2 and Φ3. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2017, 28, 350–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Prudnikov, A.P.; Brychkov, Y.A.; Marichev, O.I. Integrals and Series, Vol. 3, More Special Functions; Gordon and Breach Science: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  7. Makano, V.V. A connection formula between double hypergeometric series Ψ2 and Φ3. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2012, 23, 503–508. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bailey, W.N. Products of generalized hypergeometric series. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1928, 2, 242–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rakha, M.A.; Rathie, A.K. Generalizations of classical summation theorems for the series 2F1 and 3F2 with applications. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2011, 22, 823–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rathie, A.K.; Kim, Y.S.; Paris, R.B. On Some New Results Involving Product of Generalized Hypergeometric Series with Applications. 2021; submitted for publication. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohammed, A.O.; Kilicman, A.; Awad, M.M.; Rathie, A.K.; Rakha, M.A. Another Method for Proving Certain Reduction Formulas for the Humbert Function ψ2 Due to Brychkov et al. with an Application. Symmetry 2022, 14, 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14050868

AMA Style

Mohammed AO, Kilicman A, Awad MM, Rathie AK, Rakha MA. Another Method for Proving Certain Reduction Formulas for the Humbert Function ψ2 Due to Brychkov et al. with an Application. Symmetry. 2022; 14(5):868. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14050868

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohammed, Asmaa O., Adem Kilicman, Mohamed M. Awad, Arjun K. Rathie, and Medhat A. Rakha. 2022. "Another Method for Proving Certain Reduction Formulas for the Humbert Function ψ2 Due to Brychkov et al. with an Application" Symmetry 14, no. 5: 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14050868

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop